"... having a pool - at least, intentionally." LOL
@StarFury22 жыл бұрын
The joke itself sounded a bit unintentional, which made it even better! Good Lol
@Fortunes.Fool.2 жыл бұрын
Your unscripted work is better than most others’ scripted and edited work. Love it.
@oliversmith92002 жыл бұрын
I was about to write the same thing. The man knows and is comfortable expositing his knowledge ad hoc.
@daszieher2 жыл бұрын
@@oliversmith9200 unscripted is the only way to see one's real knowledge.
@TrojanHell Жыл бұрын
The self crits on fabulous unscripted lectures and amazing self made infographics in bloody paint of all things are kinda sweet and humble to be honest. I hope H I knows hes doing extremely well and that its mostly a warning to first time viewers who will soon grow to appreciate him for his qualities.
@chanman8192 жыл бұрын
I often forget the Typhoon displaces about as much as an Iowa-class at standard load. That's absolutely nuts.
@samuel59162 жыл бұрын
Yeah it is, the thing that makes comparisons odd is that most Soviet subs were a double-hull design which means they had a lot of unusable space inside compared to their western counterparts. I’d be curious to know what the usable interior space of a Typhoon was compared to say an Ohio. Greater diving depth and potentially better able to take battle-damage but also much bigger and more expensive to build. 🤔
@chanman8192 жыл бұрын
@@samuel5916 Diplomacy is sometimes a straight up dick measuring contest. In that regard, the Typhoons could be partly meant to show off both engineering capabilities (look at what we can build!) and as conspicuous consumption (look at what we can afford to waste resources on!). I mean, that's a big part of the job of aircraft carriers, but the Typhoon showed off a Soviet capability the Americans couldn't match, unlike any feasible carrier they could have made. Boomers also don't come with the expensive extras carriers need - the rest of the battle group, an airwing, thousands of sailors... in that respect, the Typhoon is way cheaper.
@daszieher2 жыл бұрын
@@chanman819 and boomers bind a lot of resources trailing and countering them because you really don't want one of those things sneaking up your cracks unbeknownst to you.
@samuel59162 жыл бұрын
@@chanman819 Aircraft Carriers are also the most potent offensive weapon in modern warfare. Nothing can project that level of firepower on a moments notice to virtually any part of the planet. Except nukes but those are useless for obvious reasons.
@Maverick9662 жыл бұрын
But remember that 48.000 tons is the displacement when the ballast tanks are fully flooded with water to submerge, the real displacement of the hull is 22.800 tons when the ballast tanks are empty when surfaced, so I wouldn't compare it to an Iowa which is 48.500 tons of steel.
@andrewgalvin8442 жыл бұрын
Tour guide for a Typhoon: "To get to the swimming pool...make a right at the Ferris wheel...pass 'Build-A-Torpedo', left at the bowling alley...escalator down...".
@Alex-cw3rz2 жыл бұрын
Broadside torpedoes is such a novel idea I imagine the space they take up is their main issue rather than anything particularly bad about them in terms of usefulness.
@jurgenschuler83892 жыл бұрын
I really appreciate you updating your videos instead of fire and forget. Thanks!
@Garnish4Zombies2 жыл бұрын
"at least an intentional one..." funniest dark submarine joke ever
@philkipnis7402 жыл бұрын
Mr. Sutton, you do such good work. Sir, you provide a wonderful service in your videos. You're most educational, you teaches all about not just the history of the Submarine by The goings-on and why they did it. All in all sir, I really respect your knowledge and enjoy your presentations. Please keep them coming, we really really need somebody of your caliber on KZbin.
@1952jjp2 жыл бұрын
I have actually been on the USS Triton, (she was laid up not in service), because we were looking for older sonar and comm equipment that could be used to support the other 585 class subs. She was converted, for a brief period, into a Presidential escape sub and had double wide ladders (stairs for some people) and everything that went with that, was in semi-preservation in St Juliens Creek Annex in Portsmouth, Va. In her day she was a grand boat.
@darthrex3542 жыл бұрын
So apparently that NECPA conversion was never officially confirmed, and she was scrapped without it being documented. I doubt it's classified information but it might be worth formally documenting your observations if it's not classified, since Triton was never on the list as a NEPCA platform and people might appreciate the confirmation of a direct witness to the conversions in documenting her history.
@malakov52 жыл бұрын
I have no idea how my KZbin got here but I love this content.
@stefanusloloanpieterhutaba27448 ай бұрын
the thing i can be amazed in every video you make is not the topics you talk about (although those topics are amazing still) its the fact thats its unscripted, because you must have one hell of a memory to remember all of these things on the go! cheers to you mate
@AnonymousAlcoholic7722 жыл бұрын
Man, your stuff is most enjoyable. Before i found this channel, its hard to think of something i cared less about than subs. Now im binge watching
@brotomann2 жыл бұрын
I really enjoy the unscripted videos. There is something that is immensely enjoyable about listening to someoen with obvious years of experience and expertise talk freely about the subject they are most interested in. I foresee your channel getting a lot more subscribers in the coming year now that The Algorithm is picking you up!
@GeoPoliticsCommentry Жыл бұрын
TY a sub talk about sub history that was perfectly narrated
@WildBillCox132 жыл бұрын
Excellent coverage, well tailored to the intent. Also, some nice drawings here, Mr. Sutton. I especially appreciated the Surcouf armament schematic.
@WildBillCox132 жыл бұрын
Rewatching this I googled the Gyroplane and found your Covert Shores coverage. Thumbs up.
@jameshusband33022 жыл бұрын
The unscripted-ness made this video great. Both the spontaneity and your command of the English language make it wonderful.
@Wallyworld302 жыл бұрын
I found this channel a few weeks ago and I adore it. H I Sutton is the Drachinifel with a specialty in Submarines.
@michaeldy31572 жыл бұрын
You can see the japanese sub launched seiren plane on display , at the smithsonian udvar h center. That place is incredible. A must see for anyone. Even non plane fans leave it amazed
@MisteriosGloriosos9222 жыл бұрын
*Thank you for posting all of your videos. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!*
@adamfrazer5150 Жыл бұрын
Recent subscriber : really enjoying your diagnostic approach to these complex beasts, helps fill in many blanks in my knowledge 👍🍻🇨🇦
@submarineautist2 жыл бұрын
Just a small correction: The K-class was (in terms of displacement) the largest submarine only until 1918, which was when SM U142 was built and commissioned one day before the end of WW1. It displaced 2785 tons. de.wikipedia.org/wiki/SM_U_142 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SM_U-142
@adamfrazer5150 Жыл бұрын
0:43 👌 Nicely done man 👍 The man was correct, Montana is beautiful.
@BeKindToBirds2 жыл бұрын
I adore Surcouf, what a fascinating ship. X-1 is beautiful too, I am much more interested in it and the K-class now.
@thomasdobson89782 жыл бұрын
Tracking Typhoons in th "Sea of O" was the cool op for an American fast attack in the '80s. My boat was too old and broken down, so we didn't get such ops.
@lqr8242 жыл бұрын
One thing I love in your approach is just a couple second pause on the more interesting slides to really take in what we're looking at, or have just learned. All other channels motormouth their way through, making it hard to take in. One constructive criticism is that I personally don't want to do all the calendar math in my head, nor care about the date. "It was the biggest from Feb 2016 for two years eight months." Haven't gotten to the end but a timeline and/or a side-to-side photo would be cool, though maybe you do exactly that. Just trifling matters, though, carry on good sir.
@Daimo832 жыл бұрын
Respect to you for not being stingy with your graphics
@Arhiman932 жыл бұрын
So, technically speaking, the second largest (by displacement) ship in the russian navy is the Dmitriy Donskoi, the last typhoon operative, only second to the Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft carrier?
@anuvisraa57862 жыл бұрын
yes and they where the largest from a time the soviet aircraft carriers onli take the lead in the mid 80
@ranekeisenkralle82652 жыл бұрын
Fun factoid: The hulls were designated as TK-[number] - which was the Soviet designation for heavy cruisers.
@dchiab8182 жыл бұрын
@@ranekeisenkralle8265 I thought that is for counter intelligent purpose, so other will think they are building cruisers.
@ranekeisenkralle82652 жыл бұрын
@@dchiab818 maybe in part, but given the sheer tonnage of those things, it does make sense regardless. Their regular subs are also classified as K-(number] - so basically cruisers
@dchiab8182 жыл бұрын
@@ranekeisenkralle8265 ahh, understood
@Mrbobinge Жыл бұрын
Navy UK for 11 years. Nobody during the 60's ever mentioned such monsters lurking beneath our little frigates/destroyers. Submariners forbidden to mention such stuff, explains their smirk distain of us sun bathed fish-heads lounging on deck.
@Josh-hr5mc2 жыл бұрын
I'm a simple man HI Sutton or Subbrief posts a video and I watch
@danielmartin78382 жыл бұрын
I enjoy the unscripted aspect of your vids. It makes for a genuine experience, Thank you
@huebdoo2 жыл бұрын
My Dad was on the HMCS Saskatoon / MooseJaw in WWII and worked the Radio / Radar room and was convinced that they chased down and sank the Surcouf and sank it by PEI as something / someone was sinking ships in the St. Lawrence and they believed whatever was doing it was around St. Pierre - Michelon ... He believed it was the Surcouf because it was the biggest ping he had ever seen when they were eco locating it and when they arrived at Halifax they were told it was an "exercise" and were not to talk about it. its believed the Surcouf went Vichy
@joka73162 жыл бұрын
What does vichy mean?
@huebdoo2 жыл бұрын
@@joka7316 French who switched sides
@shaider19822 жыл бұрын
15:04 I thought this would be SSN-571 (Nautilus). Amazing, the I-400 was even larger than some early nuclear subs.
@AsbestosMuffins2 жыл бұрын
kind of makes sense when you think about it though, without the need for all the diesel fuel, you can make a sub that goes 2x as far, does 2x the work, for less size, plus nautilus was as much a test of nuclear tech as it was new hullforms so its not as big as it could have been built
@NoBullNate2 жыл бұрын
With all of the powers bestowed upon me by the youtubes, I am officially changing the name of the typhoon class to "the swimming pool class"
@Arsenic712 жыл бұрын
I haven't finished watching yet but I know... it'll be good! Thanks H I Sutton for your incredible videos!
@misterthemad994 Жыл бұрын
12:58 "mysterious circumstances" is an other way of saying that it was most likely accidentally rammed by an american cargo ship or bombed by mistake by an american flying boat and then sunk to the bottom of the sea, in the Caribbean. (Surcouf was one of the subs that served with the French free forces, the FFL.)
@elanthys Жыл бұрын
Yeah it’s the speculation as I read it too, but really the only thing we know for sure is it just vanished with all hands. Unless the wreck is found (and even then that’s not a given) we’ll never know for sure.
@YensR2 жыл бұрын
13:44 Wow! How many other submarines are there that are not left/right symmetric? The bridge/sail is offset quite a bit, that must create a turning force when submerged, surely? Can somebody expand on this, please?
@karm42yn2 жыл бұрын
I'm curious as to why was this video removed initially.
@heinrichb2 жыл бұрын
A bunch of typos in dates (such as 2016 instead of 1916)
@GixxerZilla2 жыл бұрын
Fascinating
@jjbeast88232 жыл бұрын
cool vid! didnt know about most of these
@shadowmihaiu2 жыл бұрын
On steam submarines, didn't you report in another video that there are no actual reports of steam-submarine disasters related to that design? Or did I misunderstand? Because here, you say there probably were several serious issues. Thanks for your presentations, they are very informative and interesting.
@petethebastard2 жыл бұрын
@18:04 ...Bloody hell! The absolute complexity of a sub, in one image!! Great vid!! I've just discovered this channel, via Sub Brief...
@rameezahmed3863 Жыл бұрын
How do the submarines keep water out, the shaft is connected to the engine and it is a rotating mass, any gasket would wear out over time and when the submarine is subjected to high pressures while diving wouldn't that leak water into the interior? How do they manage to pull that off? Awesome content, got interested in this stuff after the TITAN submersible fiasco.
@EFCasual Жыл бұрын
There are many more high performance types of bearing/seal systems. Labyrinth seals, metal on metal seals, etc.
@hanspetergerber22482 жыл бұрын
Thanks….👍
@DAClarkism2 жыл бұрын
Excellent video, even if it was "unscripted" as you say. I've had the privilege of being on board an Ohio, and when you mentioned that the Typhoon was TWICE the size, my eye caught one of the little drawings of a 3-high rack (sleeping bunk for the folks following along), I about lost it dude! That thing is big! It's a shame all we ever see of it is that old nasty rusted pool and the Soviet sauna, because man, they must have built an incredible piece of equipment. Also, hats off to the Soviets for giving their boys a sauna and a swimming pool (though I doubt very seriously that's the reason they made the thing so large). If the US made a sub that large, I stagger to think how much firepower and capability we would cram into something that massive.
@smaikzorin4492 Жыл бұрын
The author did not say that each Typhoon missile carried 10 individually targetable warheads, and their number is 200! The typhoon was called the killer of continents and its firepower is unsurpassed by anyone !!!!
@SimonWallwork Жыл бұрын
Top quality content.
@zacharyamory83422 жыл бұрын
Once again great video! Thanks
@fugamundi59632 жыл бұрын
Typhoon was first with "intentional swimming pool" Thats my quote of 2021 :D
@LegendaryPatMan2 жыл бұрын
Didn't this drop before Christmas?
@HISuttonCovertShores2 жыл бұрын
I made some tweaks (typos in dates, added USS Argonaut). KZbin doesn't allow much in the way of improvements so had to re-upload
@Allan_aka_RocKITEman2 жыл бұрын
*Great video...👍👍*
@trey15312 жыл бұрын
What was the purpose of a tanker/transport submarine?
@darkelf2x12 жыл бұрын
To get past naval blockades / resupply other submarines, For example the Germans during WWI had transport submarines to get past the RN blockades and transport valuable German dyes/chemicals to the US (when it was neutral) in exchange for US goods/resources. In WWII, Germany had transport submarines to resupply other submarines
@lqr8242 жыл бұрын
14:20 "One of the big what-ifs." Obviously the Panama is such a nice-to-have that all US battleships are Panamax, but what is the realistic strategic win from shutting it down? I don't think the US IN PRACTICE shipped that many ships from Pacific to Atlantic or vice versa, did it? And if it took an extra... how long? Three weeks? to go around Tierra del Fuego, was there any actual battle that would have turned out a bit different?
@bruh53612 жыл бұрын
Did I miss something or is this a re-upload?
@heinrichb2 жыл бұрын
Reupload due to typos in dates in the previous version
@mupdyke2 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely AWESOME video....but hearing the first US nuclear missile sub named Ethan Allen class STILL has me roaring laughing!!!!
@76dg152 жыл бұрын
Pretty cool video overall
@TheStowAway594 Жыл бұрын
"the only submarine I know of of with a swimming pool...well and intentional one" lol
@realvanman12 жыл бұрын
The irony of a swimming pool on a ship has always been something to chuckle at.... But that of a swimming pool on a submarine is to comical to bear!!
@garynew9637 Жыл бұрын
Pretty good . Typhoon is amazing.
@jfdesignsinc.innovationsid15832 жыл бұрын
Thank u, Really enjoyed this info ..well done sir
@bottomhat2534 Жыл бұрын
"The only submarine with a swimming pool. At least an intentional one." Ha!
@alistairclarke67262 жыл бұрын
could a submarine survive a collision with the MV Estonia (1994) ?
@jannegrey5932 жыл бұрын
Didn't I see this video already?
@chrisb1777 Жыл бұрын
In fear of repeating the obvious and previously stated; you do very good work sir.
@ranekeisenkralle82652 жыл бұрын
1:00 I see you added a Red-October reference there.
@ardeladimwit Жыл бұрын
please don't apologize for being unscripted-- it indicates that you know your stuff and not copying from Wikipedia or Military Factory, etc.
@smaikzorin4492 Жыл бұрын
The author did not say one important thing, each Typhoon missile carried 6 individually targetable warheads and their total number is 120 on 20 missiles! Typhoon was called the killer of continents!!!
@shaider19822 жыл бұрын
I wonder if a large SSBN can be converted to a modern "milk cow" for AIP subs for fuel
@daszieher2 жыл бұрын
I wonder why smaller subs are going through the pains of lugging fuel around and aren't powered by smaller reactors.
@ricktoconnor2 жыл бұрын
@@daszieher small reactor tech is only becoming feasible recently with the development of small modular reactors. That being said, most non-big powers will prefer AIP or diesel simply as it is cheaper and because they dont have any ambition to do anything but defend at most their EEZs. So lugging around some fuel and AIP cells is enough.
@daszieher2 жыл бұрын
@@ricktoconnor probably. But one sees how many states strive for an at least minimal involvement with nuclear power. So I believe cost only to be a side note with submarines.
@ianmcsherry52542 жыл бұрын
@@daszieher bear in mind that many nations still prefer not to dabble with militarised nuclear power. Japan being one long standing example. The recent advent of Australian involvement is causing a different kind of anxiety, that lack of preparedness, and nuclear support infrastructure, which cannot be built overnight. I know that the first generation of Australian nuclear propulsion specialists are currently in training, some here in Britain, some in the US, but it will be years before they are 100% ready to take charge on their own. Then, of course, the boat design is yet to be finalised. Amongst other things..
@johnnycab89862 жыл бұрын
"Typhoon only had 20 missile tubes due to political reasons" How would this be possible given these were developed at the same time? Given how much development is needed, there's no way the Soviets saw the Ohio and based design considerations on that because Typhoon was in development in 1976, and Ohio class was commissioned in 1981...
@colhammer12 жыл бұрын
No script ftw.
@atunleashed2 жыл бұрын
Wait is this a repost? Thought I saw this a few weeks ago. Edit: Disregard, I read the comments 😂👌🏼👍🏼
@longhaulblue2 жыл бұрын
I'm curious about the gun turrets. How do they shoot after being submerged underwater? I would think if they are constantly flooded with water that it would cause all sorts of problems to make them operational on the surface.
@smaikzorin4492 Жыл бұрын
They are filled with water just before launching rockets!
@jonaslippert69632 жыл бұрын
why is the reupload? or is something different?
@foowashere2 жыл бұрын
Corrected and improved, I think. :)
@HISuttonCovertShores2 жыл бұрын
I made some tweaks (typos in dates, added USS Argonaut). KZbin doesn't allow much in the way of improvements so had to re-upload
@jonaslippert69632 жыл бұрын
@@HISuttonCovertShores okay thanks, I'll watch the New Part now, allways nice to see that some still care about there content and then improve it
@rajonesi2 жыл бұрын
@@HISuttonCovertShores Good information in the video. One small issue, you have the Typhoon start date as April 1979 instead of September 1979.
@bellator112 жыл бұрын
Hello Mr. Sutton. Based on your own opinion, what two submarine classes do you believe are accoustically the quietest in the world atm?
@kevlarburrito6693 Жыл бұрын
What's the difference between a "High Angle" gun and a howitzer? They seem to imply the same thing, no?
@Slippindisc2 жыл бұрын
When I saw the first photo of the Surcouf I thought it was a submersible aircraft carrier. Has there ever been any talk of making one? How amazing would that be. I’d imagine size constraints might make it impossible for fixed wing, but the idea gets my noggin joggin
@edwardstables51532 жыл бұрын
Check out the Japanese type I-400. Each carried 3 floatplanes and were intended for attacks on the Panama canal and US West Coast. However they came about too late in the war to see any effective use.
@Slippindisc2 жыл бұрын
Thanks guys I am realizing I shoulda just kept watching lol
@darthrex3542 жыл бұрын
In addition to the I-400 there were a number of design studies made for potential post war submarine carriers (kzbin.info/www/bejne/r2KnhquDYqunkJo) The US also basically used the lessons learned from the I-400 to build the Regulus cruise missile firing submarines. The largest carried 5 regulus missiles, each roughly the size of a F-86 when fully assembled.
@Svartalf142 жыл бұрын
excuse me if this come completely out of nowhere. I've heard that recent submarines were prone to using some kind of hydropropulsion instead of screws, because it's more silent. Have you made a vid about this, so I can jump there right away? Were Typhoons actually equipped with such a device? (Ghosts of Red October, eat your heart out)
@ianmcsherry52542 жыл бұрын
He has made a video on the subject, if you check the list. Screws v. propulsors basically. There is nothing on the horizon like the fictional Red October.
@HRODable Жыл бұрын
Love the videos and the information BUT the lip smacking is a lil annoying and distracting
@trevortaylor55012 жыл бұрын
Fun fact, the kirov class cruisers have a pool with waterfalls. Watched it on combat approved.
@kiiiisu2 жыл бұрын
yhx! good video as always
@jebise11262 жыл бұрын
i wonder why external torpedo tubes are not used any more?
@Eruthian2 жыл бұрын
Probably aquadynamic reasons to prevent avoidable noise sources.
@jebise11262 жыл бұрын
@@Eruthian cant be... i mean they were nicely integrated into double hulls. similar like oscar 2 has missiles on side
@MH5XXXX Жыл бұрын
that is a BIG SUB but the pool is a nice idea.
@randyhavard6084 Жыл бұрын
I got to walk around an Ohio class sub back in the year 2000 and the thing that surprised me the most was just how large it actually was.
@Deamon93IT2 жыл бұрын
Some of the names are surprising indeed. Anyway I wonder whether will see anything bigger than Typhoon, as it would require something truly enormous. Hell Typhoon herself displaces as much if not more than most of WWII battleships 😅
@GIGABACHI2 жыл бұрын
I been told there's a point when making a Sub big starts to work against it. The magnetic signature of such a large metal object makes it easier to detect. Someone with more knowledge please chime in a explain facts from educated opinions.
@TheFirebird1234562 жыл бұрын
There have been plans for submarine cargo ships and oil tankers as mentioned in the episode which would be equal to the typhoons. Those plans went nowhere but maybe in the future? I agree it probably won't be military.
@vonfaustien3957 Жыл бұрын
@@TheFirebird123456unless your having to ship under say an ice cap or are say smuggling stuff like the cartels transport would be cheaper with a surface ship. There's a reason no ones building large submarine transports
@fidem158932 жыл бұрын
The Sourcof looks like a Jules Verne machine. Really steampunk.
@mupdyke2 Жыл бұрын
I'm very curious to understand why modern submarines stopped implementing perpendicular and rear torpedo tubes? To me that seems like an obvious advantage, but I'm obviously not a submarine expert..... anyone care to enlighten my ignorance?
@vonfaustien3957 Жыл бұрын
I'd say largely because sub are now more or less just cruise missle transports and they proably want the space for vertical launch tubes.
@Walkercolt1 Жыл бұрын
You forgot the BRAND NEW SSB WISCONSIN CLASS! Too long (1125") and too wide (165') to pass through the locks in the Panama Canal!!! My Cousin is a Master Chief Petty Officer in charge of Environmental Control. I toured his "boat" and it is AMAZING!!! "Sherwood Forest" is about 7-8 STORIES tall with 48 silos. "Boystown" and "Girlstown", the enlisted quarters are privacy roomettes and luxurious, the PO and Chiefs and Quarter Masters (and the four Warrants) rooms are cruise ship type while "Officer's Country" is palatial. The Captain is a nice man and the XO a nice woman. Four Lt. Commanders for each watch, three men, one woman-I'd guess a compliment of 500+ total. THEY WEAR BELL BOTTOMS (Enlisted) from the uniform store in New Orleans with 27" bells like the 1922 Naval Uniform and piped Pinafores and look like a MILLION DOLLARS lined-up for inspection with GOB hats! Dickies dungarees (bell-bottom pants) for work details with blue GOB hats! The six "Super-Boomers" are old-school Navy. ALL officers are "SIR". The families were fed a LAVIOUS buffet-I ate at the XO's table. The "Supers" NEVER come with-in sight of land. Timmy is the "Gold" crew. He earns 6 figures or very close to it. 100% titanium hulls...mike speed at below cavitation depth (about 250 meters) 77 knots (85 MPH) mike depth CLASSIFED but DEEPER than ANY normal part of the Atlantic (at LEAST 400 meters) she has "several" thrusters, little outboard motors, totally silent that can move her SIDEWAYS if needed WITHOUT the reactor running for a LONG time. Quote the XO "Wanna find us? Find the quietest place in the ocean, and THAT'S US!" "We hide in schools of shrimp or whales or sardines."
@petervonfroster8i3 ай бұрын
i only miss the SM U-142 Class from WW1 in this List
@Ironpancakemoose2 жыл бұрын
Was this video re uploaded? I've seen this video like a few weeks ago.
@yunassaxer7119 Жыл бұрын
@darkprose3 ай бұрын
Mustard has a great video on Japan’s I-4OO.
@Brettmlyons2 жыл бұрын
Any combat kills recorded with broadside torpedoes?
@iainwalker87012 жыл бұрын
i like the videos being unscripted. Think audio would be a bit clearer if you used a pop-filter in-front of you microphone, I am no expert its just a thought.
@ramanjindal86692 жыл бұрын
Recently found your gem channel by navel news website . Please 🙏 explain french barracuda class SSN if possible ( becz after cancellation of aukus deal , India comes in into equation to get this sub in future also french defence minister recently visit India to push this sub deal) Thankyou for this amazing content.
@horsetowater Жыл бұрын
@3:00 is a white elephant heavier than a pink elephant?
@merafirewing65919 ай бұрын
Only your mom.
@adanedwardspencer6891 Жыл бұрын
I built a Typhoon class submarine, & it was known as the "Red October", & I landed up putting it in a fish tank, & I also built a German "U-Boat",& also the "Titanic 🚢", & I gave it to a mate. It looked awesome!
@jaymeseaston81172 жыл бұрын
Like J M, same, same here. If you hadn't said they were unscripted I wouldn't have known. If this is all off the top of your head, without notes, it is quite impressive. I would suggest anyone studying Communications in university could benefit by listening to your features, and take free-association notes. Communication is more than just information, as humans were attuned to how we feel when hearing it.
@黃鑫和 Жыл бұрын
I recognized your British accent.😊
@Stroopwaffe12 жыл бұрын
Is this the guy who has the gun videos ??
@Biden_is_demented2 жыл бұрын
I always thought displacement was a measure of volume, rather than weight. A balloon full of air weighs mere grams, but it displaces several kilograms/litres of water if submersed. The measure is about how big a sub is in volume, not its weight, since you can have lots of empty space inside a hull. The more cramped and stuffed with machinery a sub is, the more it weighs. But it still displaces the same as a similar class sub carrying less machinery, torpedoes, food, water, etc, as what really counts is the size/volume of the hull, and the amount of water it displaces if submersed.
@zkwip81002 жыл бұрын
Yes but in order to have control over the depth of your submarine, the buoyancy and gravity need to roughly cancel each other out, so the submarine's density has to very close to that of water it's in. Therefore it is very closely related to weight of the submarine. This means that for a submerged submarine displacement works both as a measure of volume and weight. If it's lighter than the water it displaces, the submarine will float up. Also, on the surface the displaced volume applies only to the part below water level, so it does not tell you much about the size of the submarine (or any ship) above the water, just the weight.
@Biden_is_demented2 жыл бұрын
@@zkwip8100 "Yes but in order to have control over the depth of your submarine, the buoyancy and gravity need to roughly cancel each other out, so the submarine's density has to very close to that of water it's in. " That´s what ballast tanks are for. Bigger tanks, more weight in water. You can technically remove most of the machinery, and still achieve neutral buoyancy if the tanks are big enough. The point is that "displacement" was a measure invented to convey the size of the boat, rather than the weight of the boat. Because they knew the mere weight was subject to interpretation when accessing how big it was, since you can pack a hull with heavier machinery/less open spaces vs. the same hull with plenty of open spaces and composite materials. Subs need permanent ballast at the keel, and lead can be used, occupying a lesser volume but still weighing the same as stone/iron/sand ballast (which was used back when the term was coined). The batteries were often used as such, but battery tech evolved, meaning the ballast had to be re-calculated and added or removed.
@CanadaJarod2 жыл бұрын
Displacement is a measure of weight because weight is a measure of gravitational force and gravitational force is what is displacing the weight of the water being displaced. The displaced water is the volume of the ship under the water, for a submerged submarine this happens to be the whole vessel volume, for surface ships it is more clear that displacement is a measure of weight
@daszieher2 жыл бұрын
@@CanadaJarod It is only a measure of weight through the calculation of the density of the water that it displaces.
@drawingboard82 Жыл бұрын
For any static floating object displacement and mass are identical and measured in kg. The balloon you described will not be static, it will rise until the air is thin enough that the mass of displaced air is equal to the mass of the balloon. The balloon may pop prior to this. With ships the displacement is identical to mass aka archenemies. In a submarine the displacement is essentially as mass give or take a few tens of tons which is compensated for by the control surfaces. It's tricky to balance a sub so a sub without forward movement will tend to rise or fall slowly.
@ShornDunlevy11 ай бұрын
H I Sutton clearly should be working as a researcher for a large media outlet like the BBC. Apparently the BBC has over 1 million hours of video and audio recordings 99% of which will NEVER be used. Adam Curtis has made a good stab at using them to explain quirks of history but I for one would tune in BB4 4 11.30 PM every Tuesday for a H I Sutton 'chat'. About as British as it's possible to get.
@rcwagon2 жыл бұрын
Great comment: only one with a swimming pool - - intentionally.