You know, if Hitler has an obsession with seeing American cities destroyed. He sure as hell would have loved Michael Bay films.
@Brian-om2hh4 жыл бұрын
Hitler did actually order a viability study into whether a V2 could be fired from modified U Boats off the US coast. As far as I'm aware, it didn't get past the drawing board.
@BaseDeltaZero19724 жыл бұрын
@@Brian-om2hh Watch a bit of Mark Felton do we? :)
@nathanstroud22234 жыл бұрын
He would've loved most current mayors of major American cities, frankly, especially the antisemitic one in New York.
@Brian-om2hh4 жыл бұрын
@@BaseDeltaZero1972 Not as such. I have a fairly small but informative collection of books here, some of which I think are now out of print. One in particular deals with the last few months of the Nazis plans to attempt an attack on the US, New York in particular. A few schemes and plans were considered, one of which was to launch V1's or V2's from submarines. Not that easy, as you might imagine. The Germans did shell the Eastern US coast from U Boats though, along with sinking some coastal shipping.
@WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs4 жыл бұрын
If Hitler had an obsession with seeing US cities destroyed the Me 264 would have been funded. It wasn’t. The Me 264 V1 with Jumo 211 engines flew in 1941, it languished with insufficient hangers space, draughtsman and engineers being provided by Erhardt Milch. The Me 262 V2 with BMW 801 would have had the range to reach the east coast but lightly armed. It was fast at 340mph and suitable for reconnaissance and perhaps a nighttime mine laying raid or the occasional nuisance raid at night. The takeoff run was a probelm, nearly 2500m of sealed runway was needed. It wasn’t till 1945 till the DB603H with 2400hp or DB603L would have allowed heavy remote controlled canon armament and a descent takeoff run, range and bomb load. If they were serious the Luftwaffe would have funded the Me 264/6m, a 6 engine stretch (also known as the Me 364) , which could have done the job with plain Jumo 211 engines as early as 1942/43 with the range, takeoff, bomb load and armament (b24 liberator Style tail turret with twin 20mm guns). The reality is the Germans, including Hitler, didn’t put the money into it. Goering flatly told American journalists before the war that the idea of bombing the USA was absurd due to the costs, the minimal effect and the provocation it would be seen as by America.
@go2mikerenzi4 жыл бұрын
Germany holds the record for "what if" and "almost" videos.
@lb71444 жыл бұрын
I know, right!
@-Zevin-4 жыл бұрын
1,000 year Reich! Laughs in Russian: "almost"
@pesthizid4 жыл бұрын
@@-Zevin- At least we tried and had the courage. It took not less than the whole world to bring us down. What about the russian party in Afghanistan? Wasn`t a big win, was it?
@-Zevin-4 жыл бұрын
@@pesthizid Take your literal Nazi apologetics somewhere else. Disgusting. Also what an incredible comparison, the Russian party of Afghanistan? You are considering that an equal failure as compared to the Germans loosing WW2 and getting 8 million of their own people killed in the process?
@pesthizid4 жыл бұрын
@@-Zevin- I don`t apologize, for what, i have no reason. But i strucked the cord. Russians laughing about germans, afghanis laughing about russians, i`m laughing about you. Btw. Stalin killed a lot more of his own people than little shitler did.
@michaelf70934 жыл бұрын
"The Nazis entered this war under the rather childish delusion that they were going to bomb everyone else, and nobody was going to bomb them." - Sir Arthur Harris
@cantbanme7924 жыл бұрын
lol no, they knew it was possible, they just thought theyd be able to overcome any issues with air superiority, which they did, until they lost their air superiority, even then, from the start till the very end, they were occupied with preventing and then attacking allied bombing runs. in fact, they were more prepared for air attacks than they were ground attacks, they turned their 88 flak into an anti tank gun, not the other way around.
@quadroshfu23284 жыл бұрын
"Don't fight a battle if you don't gain anything by winning." - Erwin Rommel
@quadroshfu23284 жыл бұрын
I mean they didn't do too bad considering they were fighting half the world at the same time.
@quadroshfu23284 жыл бұрын
@RDLONG500 @Michael F
@quadroshfu23284 жыл бұрын
@RDLONG500 "they" were outnumbered 5:1 whats your point?
@chegeny4 жыл бұрын
The closest production run of the Amerika Bomber was by Revell in 1:72 scale.
@El_Presidente_53374 жыл бұрын
xD
@JW-xj1yf4 жыл бұрын
LOL
@steveperreira58504 жыл бұрын
Thanks Cheggy: I was wondering where I could get my hands on one of them. I would just take it on a joy ride, looks like New York has destroyed itself, no real bombers needed, ha ha!
@dh98pr164 жыл бұрын
@@argumasch663 The bomber existed, but Felton does not say it reached NYC- he say there is a hotly disputed claim about that. Anecdotal evidence, but no documents, including squadron logs, support that.
@tubaraofeio10534 жыл бұрын
@@argumasch663 nice! love mark felton videos :D
@topgeardel4 жыл бұрын
That was a very tall order to expect a plane in the 40s to fly across the Atlantic and back. It would also have to face air defense before it made it to America.
@miamijules21494 жыл бұрын
Germans had 3 operational Junkers JU390’s stripped down and loaded with extra fuel which had enough range to get from Europe to South America; I’m not sure about air defenses and such but they could and did do it (flight to New York & South America).
@natedog35423 жыл бұрын
A lot of variables. Considering German engineering, it’s not really out of question. As for the aaa and defensive capabilities of their targets, that’s just war games.
@eddyheredia81943 жыл бұрын
They were lucky to have never attacked America's homeland. U see what happened with Japan for hitting Pearl Harbor.. how much worse do you think America would have taken revenge on Germany
@topgeardel3 жыл бұрын
@@eddyheredia8194 I understand your thinking but I don't think it was relevant to the situation. Hitler didn't make any sense in his strategy to attack both the Eastern & Western fronts....as well as Africa. I don't think retaliation meant anything to him.
@timlewis98733 жыл бұрын
If 911 is any indication of our air defense, they more than likely would have bombed us.
@TheWeatherbuff4 жыл бұрын
If Hermann Göring was to accompany the first mission, there wouldn't have been enough room for his cake and bread requirements. On a serious note, I love this channel!
@thorerikkarlsen3 жыл бұрын
Actually, there wouldn't have been enough room for HIM :)
@zorngottes17783 жыл бұрын
@@thorerikkarlsen plenty of room, in the bomb bay. New York would have been destroyed completly with one Göring. The ultimate G-Bomb
@kmaterne3 жыл бұрын
Goering was a very rotund man. He looks like a character from a Mel Brooks movie. Lol.
@patrickstewart34463 жыл бұрын
Sure you’re joking… what about his opium paraphernalia? 😁
@randyrobertson61163 жыл бұрын
LMFAO
@hi-fidude66704 жыл бұрын
It`s such a Germany WW2 sound name. The AMERIKABOMBER!
@Brian-om2hh4 жыл бұрын
That was, I believe, the code name of the project while it was being developed.
@redbluesome28294 жыл бұрын
@Hi-Fidude66 there never was an “Amerikabomber” project, that’s just more made up bullshit that the allies concocted to villainize the Germans in the eyes of the American public.
@Brian-om2hh4 жыл бұрын
@@redbluesome2829 I'm afraid you are misinformed. Prototypes were built by the companies who were competing for the contract, but both shortages of materials and supplies, brought about by the advancing allied army, brought the project to a halt. Photographs of both the construction and flight testing do exist. There was little need to villanize the Nazis. They managed that quite successfully unaided............
@wcsii4 жыл бұрын
Hitler’s, before the war.... Armored train was called “Amerika”
@bushmanPMRR4 жыл бұрын
Rammstein should use it as a name for an album, maybe including a cover of the MOTORHEAD classic 'Bomber'
@deaustin40183 жыл бұрын
Hermon Goering wanted a six engine heavy lift aircraft just in case he decided to attempt an escape at the end of the war. He never thought he'd loose so much weight by the end of the war.
@vthegoose2 жыл бұрын
Fun fact, when the western Allie’s captured him they put him on a strict diet and a rehab program so he would live to be at Nuremberg, but he committed self forever sleep :/
@oasis12822 жыл бұрын
@D R He didnt get executed
@cubismo852 жыл бұрын
@D R Goering was cremated after his execution, ashes scattered in order for neo-nazis not to make his grave a martyr place.
@oldsklteg4 жыл бұрын
"BMW engines"? better bring a damn good OBD scanner for that transatlantic flight.
@deadfreightwest59564 жыл бұрын
Make sure they don't operate when it's raining.
@vintagetintrader10624 жыл бұрын
You will need to spend a lot of time on the OBD2 scanner killing all the warning codes lol
@cooldloop23814 жыл бұрын
I have an old BMW aircraft engine from 1939. Doesn’t work tho. It also has almost the entire back half missing. Including most of the cylinders.
@artemborisov88074 жыл бұрын
I think that they were as big of assholes in the sky as they were on the road.
@Johannes_Brahms654 жыл бұрын
These were made in Germany!
@deadfreightwest59564 жыл бұрын
So Goering's boast that "they'll never bomb this place!" referred to the Luftwaffe and the United States. Got it.
@carmium4 жыл бұрын
The V-2 (or A-4) rocket was never designed to reach America. It had nowhere near the range. The A-9 project had America in mind, but never got very far in development.
@warrengreen5274 жыл бұрын
Was also never referred to as the America bomb......
@hawkeyeten24503 жыл бұрын
Was that the 2-stage V-2 rocket? I heard there were plans for a longer range rocket to smack places like New York, Boston and Buffalo.
@thomashaeyen69423 жыл бұрын
@@hawkeyeten2450 the v2 was not designed to reach the US, and the A-9 wasn't called the america bomb, but the america rocket. Duh.
@Tbonyandsteak2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, but it would be their best choice to make one that could.
@williamzk9083 Жыл бұрын
@@thomashaeyen6942 The A9 would have worked, eventually, but there was major work to complete in guidance. The Germans had the beginning of inertial navigation in platforms such as SG-66 with schuler loop tuning and radio becon navigation but a lot of work. They had an option for a manned version with the pilot parachuting out.
@lt_darkseekerantique39113 жыл бұрын
Meanwhile in war thunder~ Me264: I have better flight characteristics than the B-17s, B-24 and lancasters
@Potayto03 жыл бұрын
Lol yeeeees
@hansthegermansoldier75503 жыл бұрын
Fckin German bias
@hansthegermansoldier75503 жыл бұрын
@Prestallar they have a way too low br
@noelblack81593 жыл бұрын
@@hansthegermansoldier7550 They’re doesn’t exist any Bias
@hansthegermansoldier75503 жыл бұрын
@@noelblack8159 bruh I mean seriously twin mustang in rank 4???
@rysi0k1104 жыл бұрын
This Channel is Underrated
@johntechwriter4 жыл бұрын
Well, this episode is sheer speculation and failed to impress me. I will be wary of future productions from this outfit.
@nerino_chan4 жыл бұрын
Nah, he was pretty spot on
@nerino_chan4 жыл бұрын
John Techwriter except for the part of about fascination of burning cities
@nerino_chan4 жыл бұрын
Dragomir Ronilac Not Really. It was a totally real event that was close to happening. If the Japanese had reached the US pacific coast and had even sent men to bombard it, It won’t give me a hard time to believe this videos title.
@rucco28984 жыл бұрын
uh wot he has a PhD on history I think
@MrDK00104 жыл бұрын
If it hadn't been for Captain Steven Rogers in 1945, the Walküre would have obliterated the eastern seaboard in just mere minutes.
@DEPARTMENTOFREDUNDANCYDEPT4 жыл бұрын
Are you serious? Any so-called "Amerika bomber" would have been detected and intercepted over the Atlantic Ocean and blown out of the sky before it ever got to the coast of America.
@JimmyEatDirt4 жыл бұрын
It appears some people haven't crawled out from under their rock for a decade or so. Captain America: The First Avenger
@dkgamez29854 жыл бұрын
Everyone r/woosh
@282919734 жыл бұрын
@@DEPARTMENTOFREDUNDANCYDEPT are you special? Or do you live under a rock? Imma go with both
@DEPARTMENTOFREDUNDANCYDEPT4 жыл бұрын
Ken Kaneki “Imma go with both?” Really? Is English your second language or do you just make up words? I’m not “special” but it seems you might be, as in “Special Education” and “short bus!” You need a better hobby than annoying adults on the Internet with silly, inarticulate, meaningless questions.
@DawnOfTheDead9914 жыл бұрын
The RAF and the USAAF had enough trouble burning German cities to the ground and they were only 600 miles away and had 1000s of planes.
@johndumont31144 жыл бұрын
Germany might have been able to afford an Amerika Bomber if they didn't waste so much money on the V-2 rocket. The V-2 rocket was more expensive than the Manhattan Project but did very did little damage for the price tag. Great video as always, keep up the good work!
@HappyBeezerStudios Жыл бұрын
And yet it's technology has been continued to bring people to the moon
@williamzk9083 Жыл бұрын
-The V2 was not more expensive than the B-29 or atomic bomb project. As a percentage of military expenditure however it was about the same proportion but still 15% or so the cost since German military expenditures were much less. The V2 would have been a success within about 6 months. It was launched using the interim LEV-3 system that offered a CEP accuracy of 4.5km. However the SG-66 system with a stable platform and additional cross range accelerometer was testing and designed to achieve an accuracy of 500M CEP. There was a beam riding system called vollzirkel that should have achieved 300m CEP and the winged A4b with accuracy of 80m using "Wasserspiegel" radar guidance. -The numbers are also misleading. The Most V2 that were built were never launched and costs were going down from 16000 hours per missile to 4000 hours. -It has to be remembered a V2 didn't require a crew of 7-10 that was trained at great expensive of which half would die. The V2 didn't require escort fighters. The V2 didn't require an airfield that needed defending. The V2 didn't require a ground crew bigger than the air crew. -The Germans could produce 6-7 V2 for the same cost as producing a Lancaster but they could operate the V2 for much cheaper than the Lancaster. The 20 ground, air and airfield crew needed to keep an telecaster operating provide enough man hours in themselves to produce a V2 every month. -The other thing is the Lancaster or B-17 couldn't operate over over German except in large numbers to saturate German defenses and even then needed escorts. There is no way Germany could put 500 aircraft and 500 escorts over the UK. They could put 1000-4000 V2 a month.
@michaelmarler70164 жыл бұрын
So a bomber that was NEVER built "almost" reached America? Do you watch Ancient Aliens often?
@Frank1198114 жыл бұрын
This guy is high on something.
@apple222sickly4 жыл бұрын
@@Frank119811 Mr.bigbrain he meant the range of the bomber was so close for reaching the US
@paulcrumley97564 жыл бұрын
@@apple222sickly Almost reached means. . . wait for it. . .ALMOST REACHED! None of the few prototypes ever came to the production stage, and anecdotes don't prove anyone ever came close to "reaching" the US, even with prototype patrol aircraft, much less with a non-existent Nazi nuke. . .The title is way overexaggerated, but hey, it got our attention, didn't it?
@apple222sickly4 жыл бұрын
@@paulcrumley9756 Even tho i was jugging you have really good points
@chrisstarring29913 жыл бұрын
I'm not saying it was Nazis...... But it was Nazis!
@mrwideboy4 жыл бұрын
Is the narrator on speed?
@paboooj14 жыл бұрын
Yes
@blue_k.78994 жыл бұрын
*yes*
@blue_k.78994 жыл бұрын
How has somebody already liked my reply to this comment
@justingoldstein52694 жыл бұрын
lol
@dx14504 жыл бұрын
It's a robot.
@mikeh78604 жыл бұрын
Just when I think I’ve seen or heard of every cool German plane from ww2 I stumble upon a new one
@tierone47614 жыл бұрын
The front of the one bomber in the video ironically resembled the Boeing B29, along with a view of the cockpit as well. Good Day Everyone!
@SeannoG14 жыл бұрын
There's actually a really good historical book about this call "Impossible Target"
@kirkjohnson93534 жыл бұрын
Sounds interesting . Thanks
@notforgetful49264 жыл бұрын
Fitting name
@rsears783 жыл бұрын
Had Hitler kept his agreement with Stalin and directed the Nazis towards America, can you imagine the havoc they would have caused?
@adamkowalski95594 жыл бұрын
The BV 238 was also regarded to be used as "America bomber" for some time. But it become destroyed by british air strike just before it started for his first intercontinental flight. Being a flying boat, BV 238 would be refueled on high sea by U-boats. This conception of using bomber flying boats with submarine supply help was operationally used by Japan in II WW and in soviets conceptions in 1960's.
@williamzk9083 Жыл бұрын
I don't think the BV-238 had the range. 4110 miles is only half the range needed and refueling a flying boat in the middle of the Atlantic not realistically possible due to both weather and allied patrols.
@epikmanthe3rd4 жыл бұрын
The USA had a similar program in the late 30s for a super long range bomber. Two of the designs were actually built, the XB-15 and XB-19. The latter being the biggest bomber the US fielded until the B36.
@epikmanthe3rd4 жыл бұрын
Oh, and the XB-19 had the coolest nickname; The Hemisphere Defender.
@stevemc012 жыл бұрын
“Sir? The Germans are building a new bomber. Our intelligence reports are confirming the Luftwaffe is building something codenamed ‘AMERIKA’.” “…so a new bomber to hit Ottawa?” “Idk, man. Maybe for Canada? Maybe for Moscow? London again?”
@shaider19824 жыл бұрын
Intresringly enough, Hitler's personal train was previously named Amerika.
@dontneedtoknowmyname.68284 жыл бұрын
@David Parry Should have called it Russia then.
@casinodelonge4 жыл бұрын
He later changed its name to "Trainy McTrainface"
@kurtwpg4 жыл бұрын
Was it wunderbar?
@blakena49074 жыл бұрын
Your channel is amazing. Thanks for the awesome content, man.
@InfiltrateIndustries4 жыл бұрын
13:17 Doktor Merkwürdigliebe / Dr. Strangelove
@davecrupel28174 жыл бұрын
Holy sh*t!!!
@lorensims48464 жыл бұрын
At the same time, America had its own plans for a trans-Atlantic bomber. The B-36 wasn't ready until after the war was over but it became the backbone of the Strategic Air Command at the beginning of the Cold War.
@jshepard152 Жыл бұрын
Yes. It was predicated on the idea that Britain could fall and the US would have to bomb Europe from North American bases.
@franktreppiedi2208 Жыл бұрын
Wasn't the B 36 built in case Britian fell and we had to bomb Germany from the US?
@lorensims4846 Жыл бұрын
@@franktreppiedi2208 Yup. It was to be our first transatlantic bomber. But WWII was over before it was ready for the Air Corps. It did manage to come into its own in the early years of the Cold War.
@williamzk9083 Жыл бұрын
The XB-15 and XB-19 were started and completed well before the Me 264 and could have bombed Europe from at least Labrador. The Me 264 was started after the American Lend Lease Act was signed. Both the B-29 and B-36 program started before the Me 264.
@GTP2-zg9tn8 ай бұрын
Only one plane met the Amerika bomber requirements: the Horten flying wing XVIII six jet engine proposal. It was approved, but the war ended.
@steveee49572 жыл бұрын
Even if Germany was successful in producing an Amerika bomber, they would have been shot down in droves because they would have made the trip without fighter escort.
@KAG22034 жыл бұрын
Could you please talk a little faster, there is still a fragment of a little paus between the words.
@michaelawford73253 жыл бұрын
Such a tense staccato speech pattern is quite off putting. Take a break ! relax.
@sski4 жыл бұрын
I'm pressing X to Doubt on that "Hitler watching cities on fire porn". I'll need a citation for that.
@DerUfo4 жыл бұрын
The winner writes history... and things are then quite one sided afterwards.. remember... power corrupts all things.. including the truth
@yowbeatup72594 жыл бұрын
A facist have a mental breakdown in Berlín city
@somethinglikethat21764 жыл бұрын
@@DerUfo the first proper historian (Thucydides) was on the losing side. In fact if you look beyond that cheap throw away line you'll see it's not really the case at all. Eg. How many Germans wrote books after the war.
@culturallyawake73994 жыл бұрын
Could of sworn it would of been Churchill and FDR. Anyone remember Dresden? The allies COMPLETLY LEVELED Germany. Hitler didn't want any of this. People need to read what the leaders wrote, and watch the speeches instead of being told by people who weren't there. Even Churchill said "the air opened paths along which death and terror could be carried far behind the lines of the actual enemy; to women, children, the aged, the sick, who in earlier struggles would perforce have been left untouched" - The Great War Vol 3. Page 1602 Many more quotes as well. People need to realize the truth.
@michaelf70934 жыл бұрын
Hitler also liked to watch films of political prisoners being hanged.
@alexiszorbec-legras82324 жыл бұрын
This aircraft had actually started to be built in an aircraft factory requisitioned in France. I even think he did a few flights just after the war and was curving dangerously.
@jjmerrow80624 жыл бұрын
The Me 264 is basically just a young B-29
@packr723 жыл бұрын
The B-29 came first.
@jjmerrow80623 жыл бұрын
@@apis_aculei I meant it as a joke because the cockpit looked similar
@MartinMizner3 жыл бұрын
@@packr72 fun fact good to know
@michaeldunne3383 жыл бұрын
The Me 264 was basically a failed strategic bomber prototype and development program. The B-29 gave some serious headaches, but the experience and supporting industry was there - Boeing had already brought into service the B-17 (in 1938).
@liamgavinwells3 жыл бұрын
Goeing G-29 Süpër-förtrëss
@badstimpy4 жыл бұрын
Love your content but reckon you can end the videos a tad better. They just seem to end promptly without a sense of closure !! Keep up the great work .
@PeteCourtier4 жыл бұрын
A slowing of the delivery would also help. It is improving though👍 Mind you, I would probably be shit at making a KZbin video😂👍👍
@adammiller34184 жыл бұрын
thats kinda his thing
@Idahoguy101574 жыл бұрын
The Third Reich and their too little, too late wonder weapons... Even when they had a V1 and V2
@ozzy77634 жыл бұрын
Don’t forget Hitler wanting the Me 262 to carry bombs ! Lol
@joeg54144 жыл бұрын
more like too big, too late. They were obsessed with making everything the biggest.
@deadfreightwest59564 жыл бұрын
And thus was born the History Channel to apologize for the Third Reich's shortcomings and explain away the lucky breaks the Allies had.
@anthonygarcia18464 жыл бұрын
They had a u boat that they say could have turned the war if produced in mass numbers
@deadfreightwest59564 жыл бұрын
@@anthonygarcia1846 - But of course, due to limited resources, bad planning and general incompetence, they didn't.
@Jumpy-xv7gk4 жыл бұрын
Hey dark docs your awesome
@FireAngelZero4 жыл бұрын
All the “Dark” series are awesome, “Dark Skies” and “Dark footage” are my favorites...
@Commander8004 жыл бұрын
This
@FireAngelZero4 жыл бұрын
Trump Super Majority 2020 yes... I wonder that constantly... they do a very good job at staying “dark”
@koukimonzta3 жыл бұрын
In todays day and age, this is the job of an ICBM
@deezem52943 жыл бұрын
Very important information. Totally would have never known
@Colonel_Obvious3 жыл бұрын
Germany did reach America. With U-boats. The waters along North America’s eastern coast is littered with ships sunk by U-boats. And with sunken U-boats. Allied countermeasures turned the tide, just as they would have done in the air if needed. A relative few German long range bombers would not have been decisive.
@austin18394 жыл бұрын
Hitler promised his own military that he would NOT declare war until at least 1946. If he'd only have waited then we might all be eating bratwurst and sauerkraut today.
@genes.32854 жыл бұрын
Nah, Hitler knew the limitations of Germany. He wasn't even that enthusiastic about attacking Britain.
@greenmtroamer334 жыл бұрын
If he hadn’t invaded Russia it might have been a different outcome. Luckily he was foolish enough to think he could defend two fronts.
@alganhar14 жыл бұрын
The problem with this kind of statement is that it assumes everyone would have sat back and watched without doing anything themselves. Which is a pretty lazy way of looking at things. Let us take Britain for example, what do you think Britain would have done had Hitler instituted the Z Plan for the Kreigsmarine? You think that a nation that lived and died on the strength of its Navy would have done NOTHING? Not by a long shot! They would have enacted the escalation clause of the Naval Treatie and started an expansion of the Royal Navy, including the planned N3 and G3 Battlecruiser and battleships. They would have massively expanded their destroyer program to include far, far more Tribal Class, and give the timescale may have brought in the Battle and Daring Class by the start of a 1946 war. Unlike Germany, Britain had the Naval Construction infrastructure required to comprehensively outbuild the proposed Z Plan in both quantity and quality. Then you have the Royal Air Force, which by a start date of 1946 would be seeing aircraft such as the de Haviland Hornet, the Hawker Fury, and other late war aircraft designs entering service at the start of the war. As for the army, the mid war saw the major problem with British Tank design solved, lack of a decent engine, with the advent of the Meteor engine, a de rated merlin specifically designed for tanks. That led by 1944 to the Comet, and by 1945 the first Centurions were entering service, albeit with the 17 pounder rather than the planned 20 pounder. You see the problem? Fact is other nations would NOT have stood idly by and watched Hitler ramp up his forces to the extent he had planned. They WOULD have reacted. The Royal Navy had literally decided that 1944 - 1946 was the most likely period for a major war to start and had plans for a full 12 Fleet Carriers and fully replacing all current RN Battleships with modern designs by 1945. Not to mention a quadrupling of the Tribal Destroyer Force from 28 to over a hundred of those superb ships.
@coachhannah24034 жыл бұрын
austin1839 - The arms race and Hitler's insistence on autarky, both set in stone, meant the timetable was forced on Hitler. Things would have REALLY been impossible (but reallygood for everyone else) had Hitler waited.
@steve51234567894 жыл бұрын
@@greenmtroamer33 There was no waiting. If the russians invaded Romania to take the oil fields the germans would of lost before the battle even began. He stayed neutral in finnish war for guaranteeing the soviets wouldn't invade romania.
@lafeelabriel4 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: If anyone here, other than me of course, has watched Konpeki No Kantai, the TA-400 is clearly where they got the inspiration for the Germans' Jormungand (apt name must be said) heavy bomber in that show.
@coachhannah24034 жыл бұрын
A-bomb: $2+ billion B-29: $3+ billion. Amerika bomber: not in this universe...
@Ebolter14 жыл бұрын
the Amerika bomber was very true
@coachhannah24034 жыл бұрын
Joseph Heaney - What would it have done?
@Ebolter14 жыл бұрын
@@coachhannah2403 I know , but they were close to developing their own weapons of mass destruction with a bomber that could deliver them
@coachhannah24034 жыл бұрын
Joseph Heaney - What WMD might that be? And, no, they were nowhere close to developing, let alone producing, the Amerika.
@RedOrm684 жыл бұрын
@@coachhannah2403 well, the Third Reich did try to develop its own nuclear weapons, using dideuteriumoxide, or heavy water, from the Hydro-plant in Norway.
@dansotelo2284 жыл бұрын
To those looking for tangible evidence of this Amerikan airplane, I know where one of the engines exist, and it's massive. For some reason, several rare WW-II German machines and artifacts ended up at LA's Griffith Park train museum in the late 40s and early 50s. I can remember in the late 70s & mid-80s they had a flying Buzz bomb outside rotting away. Also next to a vintage LA Fire ladder truck they had this massive Amerika engine, with a simple plack saying how this engine was captured after WW-II and was to fit on a Massive bomber to drop a nuclear bomb on New York. I'm sure the museum is gone by now so I would check with Griffith Park Museum officials to track down this engine which I think belongs in the Smithsonian.
@funroll-loops60694 жыл бұрын
Awesome video as always!! I was kind of hoping there might have been a mention of the Horten brother's proposal too.
@Onmyfacepls4 жыл бұрын
Nazi Germany was nowhere near close to making atomic weapons. It had some concepts down but it would have been years before they could achieve nuclear arms.
@dave_h_87424 жыл бұрын
@michael Dinneweth fire bombing Tokyo killed more than the first Atomic bomb. Japan started total war and so America did the same back to them so what's your problem with that ?
@BB-gr9hq4 жыл бұрын
They knew there was a deliverable atomic bomb design out there somewhere. But they were barking up several wrong trees. I guess they should not have run off all the Jewish scientists that finally figured it out (for the allies).
@mcnudde4 жыл бұрын
@formless777 Sources please?
@jamesricker39974 жыл бұрын
If they had tried they would have had a huge factory complex conveniently in range of allied bombers
@Ron52G4 жыл бұрын
@michael Dinneweth How many people did the Japanese slaughter during the Rape of Nanking and the Nanking Massacre?
@slojoe584 жыл бұрын
I'm confused, when did the alien spacecraft come into play?
@tonycerino96453 жыл бұрын
They didn't understand the UFO tech at the time, it worked like magic..
@RottenFlesh-we6nu4 жыл бұрын
This is almost a german b-29 on the outside
@aljayrankin83534 жыл бұрын
Actually this came first so the b29 would be the American B29 ahhaha
@victoregley53594 жыл бұрын
design follows function
@Helperbot-20004 жыл бұрын
@@aljayrankin8353 i guess it is the americaN bomber then?
@packr723 жыл бұрын
@@aljayrankin8353 Came first? The XB-29 flew first and was already in production before the 264 flew. The B-29 was ready for combat first too.
@geraldtrudeau32234 жыл бұрын
No this is more like it. This is the quality that dark skies can be up to. Congratulations.
@smithchanning30053 жыл бұрын
This was my favorite video you’ve done yet. Thank you. Keep up the great work
@bongwelll2 жыл бұрын
Man I love this channel. Even the name is great.
@rudolfabelin3834 жыл бұрын
EDIT!!!!!!!!!!!! 7:56 I was writing the text below as I listened to your video. I hear you mention Hans Pancherz at this time point . I am not aware of Capetown, but if Hans said so, you should take it very seriously. He was a living legend, only one to have flown the JU 248. When I was Chairman of the Malmö Division of the Swedish Society of Aeronautics ans Astronautics I persuaded onkel Hans to hold a lecture of the JU 248. If things had been different at the wars end, the record books would not say Chuck Yeager, but Hans Pancherz instead. Here is where I started to write parallel to watching the video: Hi! A man I grew up with a man who was the chief test pilot (German: Versuchfliger) of the JU 390. He worked for my father after the war at MFI, Malmö Flygindustri in Sweden. Some of the test flight he made started in Germany, went down to Central Africa and back again (nonstop). As far as I know one of the few uses of it was to fly to South America and back with rare alloy metals. The chief test pilot's name was Flugkapitän Hans Pancherz, he was also an engineer. At the end of the was he was put in charge for the development of all jet and rocket aircraft. It was he who made the Heinkel He 162, Volksjäger, a flyable aircraft after it's problems that killed his predecessor. The flights of JU 390 are not fiction. BTW Flugkapitän Hans Pancherz made the worlds second catapult ejection in a JU 290, not planned. Tail broke in a world record attempt.
@rudolfabelin3834 жыл бұрын
@Mark Gaiennie Yep! What I wrote here is only a small percentage of the people I grew up with. Today, most of these people has passed away.
@bjrnnordgarden12494 жыл бұрын
Great as always
@weirdbritishperson95424 жыл бұрын
Bjørn Nordgarden it was posted a minute ago
@bjrnnordgarden12494 жыл бұрын
@@weirdbritishperson9542 still great tho
@weirdbritishperson95424 жыл бұрын
Yea I was just saying sorry
@silvertalon0074 жыл бұрын
There was even a Heavy Bomber Version of the Horton-229 conceived, but like the P-1000 Ratte, it never made it off the paper it was drawn on.
@marrvynswillames49754 жыл бұрын
@RoughneckMP didn't they tested with an radar that was obsolete by 1942?
@marrvynswillames49754 жыл бұрын
besides, the test was with a fully wood model, the actual aircraft would be less stealth due of the steel components
@silvertalon0074 жыл бұрын
@@marrvynswillames4975 Perhaps... But if the Germans had more time and resources they probably could have worked around that somehow. Its Germany for cryin' out loud.
@modelm773 жыл бұрын
The Germans had. a real talent for drawing cool-looking airplanes.
@bert8373 Жыл бұрын
Also a great read-Luftwaffe Over Americ by Manfred Griehl
@DudeKentucky4 жыл бұрын
Great work!! The research on this doc must have been tremendous!!
@dushooter4 жыл бұрын
Great job on the research and presentation!!! Keep it coming.
@_Patton_Was_Right4 жыл бұрын
"WE DEFEATED THE WRONG ENEMY!" They killed Patton for speaking the truth
@barrierodliffe41554 жыл бұрын
Patton got himself in the way of a vehicle. He died and he was not exactly very intelligent.
@patalinghugjosephmarkkent60824 жыл бұрын
Yeay another vid! Keep em coming
@Gonzalouchikari4 жыл бұрын
When I see "Amerika" instead of "America", I think in the Rammstein song.
@BladeScraper4 жыл бұрын
same
@senorpepper34054 жыл бұрын
Amerika ist wunderbar.
@bennoakes24774 жыл бұрын
@@senorpepper3405 nein
@laurencethornblade11954 жыл бұрын
@@senorpepper3405 America is underbar
@senorpepper34054 жыл бұрын
@@laurencethornblade1195 Ist es nicht unterbar? Ich denke. Das ist der text zum lied.
@blackbuttecruizr3 жыл бұрын
Love the "Ford Aircraft" logo on the lab coat at 16:33.
@semperfidelis98962 жыл бұрын
I Love all that Videos Form all "Dark" Channels good job. Neutral talking and interisting sry me German and my english ist not good greetz from Berlin Germany 🤗😍😘
@gotanon89584 жыл бұрын
Oh Amerika bomber did exist and went into service except it goes in the other direction to germany its know as the B-36 convair
@zapfanzapfan4 жыл бұрын
Six turning, four burning :-)
@redbluesome28294 жыл бұрын
@Anon We are no relation to any German plane. The B-36 reflected the engineering trends of its time, jet/piston hybrid was the only way to meet performance demands before jet technology (and reliability) had advanced to the point of allowing a full jet bomber like the B-52.
@gort82034 жыл бұрын
@@redbluesome2829 Actually the B-36 met is requirements and was in service with just the R-4360s. The jets were added later, mostly to boost speed over the target area and give the Russian jet interceptors a somewhat tougher target.
@failing2improve174 жыл бұрын
very epic video thanks
@mrman40034 жыл бұрын
Very informative, keep up the good work.
@S1lverspike2 жыл бұрын
This channel is seriously underrated.
@ethan8661 Жыл бұрын
In 9:33 scenes, Kurt Tank designed Ta 400 mixed-powered(six BMW 801E radial piston engines, two Junkers Juno 004 turbojet engines) strategic bomber is fantasy and nice pretty good, Ta 400 use powerplant by BMW 801E engines(deploying about at 1,975hp) and Junkers Juno 004 turbojet engines(deploying about at 9.7 kN), They originally planned for BMW 802 or DB 604 or Jumo 223 engine, But three new and over 2,000hp engine has tested to fail and no massive production, They have use BMW 801E radial piston engine and Juno 004 turbojet engine to give Ta 400, And that try to use BMW 801Q(turbocharger) or 801R(two stage four speed supercharger) give Ta 400 more flying high speed and high altitude to deporting Ta 400 strategic bomber version, But it is never exists upgrade project.
@22vx4 жыл бұрын
This failure saved Germany from nuclear obliteration.
@billdewahl70074 жыл бұрын
Or...time did.
@GodKing_Guts4 жыл бұрын
@@oem42 bro they had no idea about that stuff at the time. Legit just yeeted a new bomb on japan amd tested them for years after. That's why we understand radiation and its dangers
@ElGrandoCaymano4 жыл бұрын
What?? The FW-TA 400 was to carry 53,000lbs in bombs? vs 14k for a Lancaster or 16k for a B-29 Superfortress (or 4.8k for a B-17) A FW TA-400 would carry as much bombs as 11 B-17s - across the Atlantic!
@Helperbot-20004 жыл бұрын
Now thats alota damage! Of course it would have been way to easy to shoot down over the atlantic
@modelm773 жыл бұрын
A lot of these imaginary planes have spectacular specifications. They take the same horsepower as a B-29 and purport to fly a heavier plane further, higher and faster with a heavier payload, as if they had the ability to produce those powerful engines or scrounge up the fuel to fly them.
@kurtwpg4 жыл бұрын
He came so close. If only it had been engineered, tested, flown, and had enough fuel in the country to get it to America.
@paulcrumley97564 жыл бұрын
three more words. . . "and mass-produced." It would take hundreds if not thousands of these dream machines to "reach" the US. A significant percentage likely would have simply crashed into the North Atlantic from glitches in the newly introduced technical stuff; another large percentage would have had to fight their way through the coastal defenses, and if the US could produce enough fighters to use in Europe, diverting a small percentage to homeland defense would have been trivial.
@modelm773 жыл бұрын
@@paulcrumley9756 Yes, and after the first attack with 10 of the 24 bombers dispatched getting to the target and having managed to drop a combined 20 tons of bombs, many of which would have exploded, over the greater NYC metropolitan area, any future raids would have been met with swarms of Corsairs and Hellcats from hastily-redeployed escort carriers starting about 1,500 miles offshore and shot into the Atlantic in droves. That's assuming the Germans had the capability to produce hundreds of bombers, which they didn't, or to provide them with trained aircrew, which they couldn't, or to provide the fuel for them, which they couldn't either. Several of these prototypes were destroyed in Allied air attacks; why would anyone think they could produce a strategically important bombing force unmolested? They'd be bombed into dust.
@Zhoolik Жыл бұрын
@@modelm77 Yep, it would have been an ineffective one-and-done. Besides starting a genocidal, unjustified war of aggression upon millions of innocent people, the second mistake was expending one's air force with insufficient resources to replace in the Battle of Britain in 1940. Putin is experiencing a similar fate with his tank army in the Ukraine. "Where are my T-90's!?"
@KG-li7kg4 жыл бұрын
Zum einen: Diese ME264 war zwar als Langstreckenbomber geplant und sogar mit 1 Exemplar fertig Gebaut. Diese einzige maschine wurde aber während eines Luftangriffes, zerbomt und eine neue Maschine wurde nicht mehr gebaut. Abgesehen davon, soweit war man damals noch nicht, das ein Flugzeug von Deutschland oder einen anderen Punkt von Europa aus, den Flug bis zu den USA und zurück geschafft hätte. Dazu hätte man eine Base als Zwischenstation zum Auftanken haben müssen, was Deutschland aber nicht hatte. Es gab ja auch noch andere Mitbewerber, die einen sogenannten "America-Bomber" konstruierten, wie z.B. Junkers mit der JU 390 (6-Motor) . Der kühnste Entwurf stammte ja von den Gebrüdern Horten, die einen "Nurflügler" mit gewaltigen Ausmassen auf dem Papier hatten, doch alle diese Entwürfe waren nur "Heisse Luft". Inzwischen war mit in der Raketenentwicklung sehr weit fortgeschritten, so das man ein Raketenprojekt in Angriff nahm, dies war eine 2-stufige Rakete, die man A9 nannte. Auch von dem Österreichischen Konstrukteur Sänger war ein Entwurf auf dem Zeichenbrett fertig, aber zur Produktion solcher Fluggeräte kam es aus Gründen der Kriegslage nicht mehr.
@crownprincesebastianjohano70693 жыл бұрын
When played at .75 speed it almost sounds like professional voice over work by Richard Kiley. Which is a God-send. My dear fellow speaks so quickly and haltingly that it is somewhat distracting.
@wynterr78624 жыл бұрын
Ah yes, Germany managed to forget about the concept of stealing
@5777Whatup4 жыл бұрын
I think they did it well. Our bomb sights and all.
@lairdcummings90924 жыл бұрын
When they could, they did. They copied from observation, too. Bottom line, though, is that until mid-war, the Germans had little practical need to swipe much. Their technology was mature, and roughly comparable to their foes, where it wasn't actually superior. By the time the Germans *needed* to start swiping ideas, it was already much too late.
@5777Whatup4 жыл бұрын
Laird Cummings well everyone of Hitlers commanders told him not to move until 1945. He didn’t listen. Oh boy if he had of... they might of been able to do something hmm 🤔
@5777Whatup4 жыл бұрын
Barbarossa was really what fucked them. Dunkirk and not rolling on the BEF was a big mistake. Hindsight is 20/20
@lairdcummings90924 жыл бұрын
@@5777Whatup that's what happens when you let a corporal run your wars.
@tegunn4 жыл бұрын
They still had to worry about fighter escort..
@jamesricker39974 жыл бұрын
Someone in Germany actually did the math Figured the cost of materials and fuel and potential damage then came to the conclusion that shorter range bombers gave them a better return on investment
@harryplummer63564 жыл бұрын
And of course getting back! Cheers!
@Veldtian14 жыл бұрын
"Ahh the Luftwaffe, the Washington Generals of the History Channel." ~ Homer J Simpson. 'Lisa the Tree Hugger' Season 12.
@bengale70543 жыл бұрын
Could you do a video on the BV 238 I’m amazed with how it worked and it’s overall life. I can find little information about the one prototype that was completed and it’s very minemal.
@MoveAhead1014 жыл бұрын
A Focke Wulf Fw 200 V1 „Condor“ flew on the 10. of August 1938 non-stop from Berlin to New York. You make it sound, that this was impossible to fly those distances at that time. Such a plane is currently undergoing restoration in Bremen and Hamburg and will be on display in Berlin.
@Zerzayar4 жыл бұрын
Well, it had to land and be refueled, hadn't it?
@MoveAhead1014 жыл бұрын
Zerzayar yes, but some people were so fanatic, they would have died if „necessary“
@modelm773 жыл бұрын
Cool. Now turn around and fly back after having carried 4,000 lbs of bombs on the outward journey.
@Soildus4 жыл бұрын
Great video as always. But I thought the Horten 18 was the only bomber Germany planned to bomb America with. Anyways, please do a video on it and the Horten 229!
@puremaga174 жыл бұрын
Horten 229?.. Horten 229.. oh you mean the prototype for Jack Northrop's YB-49 and the B-2. Yup!
@farmazoniarz4 жыл бұрын
@@puremaga17 no he means Ho 229 you stoopid freeaboo
@puremaga174 жыл бұрын
@@farmazoniarz Joking sarcasm sometimes does not come across via text.. just like your post.. But how the heck did you know I was a freeaboo.. that's classified 😜
@mmandershied57034 жыл бұрын
Deliberately sped up audio is annoying.
@Blackwolf-of5kx4 жыл бұрын
Mark Felton beat you to it
@kirkjohnson93534 жыл бұрын
I hope we don't run short on war stories.
@markrozenberg79594 жыл бұрын
Kirk Johnson let’s hope we do.
@bernardedwards84614 жыл бұрын
Without s nuclear weapon the Amerkabomber was a waste of time and resources. When the war ended, Germany was about 2 years away from producing a nuclear weapon, which it couldn't have used anyway for fear of retaliation in kind. And had Germany had a vast fleet of these bombers, where would the fuel they needed have come from?
@michaelmoon57004 жыл бұрын
I agree with the need to take look at the lack of any heavy four engine bomber. Being able to bomb the munitions factories the Soviets set up East of the Ural Mountains would have had a greater impact than bombing New York.
@deadfreightwest59564 жыл бұрын
14:04 - What the hell is a shoulder mount on a bomber?!
@jackt61124 жыл бұрын
It's not real clear but with aircraft it normally refers to the mounting position of the wing.
@kimchipig4 жыл бұрын
Ahhh, WW2 bombing in one of the clips. Most of the bombs dropped blew up dirt in fields.
@Lenoch_4 жыл бұрын
1:10 “Official plans for a long-range bomber officially didn’t commence...” redundant writing asf
@Helperbot-20004 жыл бұрын
When you writing an essay like:
@randomsomeone16174 жыл бұрын
Great video as usual 👌
@SanderAnderon4 жыл бұрын
learned a lot here...your research, production & narration are always TV/doc broadcast quality
@deadfreightwest59564 жыл бұрын
For a bot
@JohnDoe-pv2iu4 жыл бұрын
For as technically advanced as the Germans were, they didn't have the foresight to build aircraft carriers!
@randomlyentertaining82874 жыл бұрын
They did. The Graf Zeppelin. Construction was stopped when the war started, then started again after the showings of aircraft in the attacks on Pearl Habor and Taranto, the sinking of Bismarck, and the Battle of Midway before being permeantly stopped after Hitler became disillusioned with the Kriegsmarine's surface ships. But Germany never would've really had a use for it any as they had no carrier capable aircraft and the moment it was completed, it would've been destroyed by RAF planes or RN ships. There were also many plans to build carriers, even as early as WWI. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_carriers_of_Germany
@JohnDoe-pv2iu4 жыл бұрын
@@randomlyentertaining8287 I got you on that. My point was in the 30s, they should have had a couple under construction. In other words, they should have had at least two prior to the start of the war. Working out a suitable carrier plane would have been a piece of cake compared to developing this bomber. Yall take Care and be safe.
@peterson70824 жыл бұрын
They weren't technologically advanced over any other nation.
@YUSKHAN4 жыл бұрын
They did the graf zeppelin unfinished project, by 1941 the entire German war machine was stuck in the Soviet Union, if they had missed the Russian winter they would have defeated the Soviet Union and brought AmeriKKKa down without using a single aircraft carrier
@JohnDoe-pv2iu4 жыл бұрын
@@peterson7082 sorry buddy but Yes they were. Why do you think the Soviet Union and America were grabbing up Germans, not for war trials but for weapons development after WW2? Operation Paperclip was a great success!
@tapio834 жыл бұрын
Btw I prefer playing this at 0.75 speed - makes it somehow easier listening
@debbiewilliamson32864 жыл бұрын
6:16 why is that Engineer wearing a FORD School coat?
@RobertGarcia-wv8vx4 жыл бұрын
@Debbie Williamson , Um, "You can afford a Ford" ? Leave it to a woman to notice clothes. Hahahahaha
@debbiewilliamson32864 жыл бұрын
@@RobertGarcia-wv8vx I work for Ford, hence my interest and yes I can afford one
@RobertGarcia-wv8vx4 жыл бұрын
@@debbiewilliamson3286 , Hahahaha. Do you eat Little Debbies? They are great with coffee in the morning.
@jshepard152 Жыл бұрын
I can't speak to the specific footage, but Ford had factories in Germany during WW2. If memory serves, Ford even made the US Congress compensate it for bombing one of them.
@DajjalAbulahabov4 жыл бұрын
9:00 what´s the ugly pyramid skyscraper on the foreground, please?
@twoguysandavan844 жыл бұрын
Love your hard work, always an enjoyable watch.
@cesarebeccaria76414 жыл бұрын
From everything I've read, Germany and Japan took opposite extreme wrong approaches to weapons. Germany devoted too much effort into research and development of new designs in aircraft and submarines. Japan spent the war manufacturing essentially the same aircraft, subs and ships they had at the beginning of the war. Both methods failed. Germany never had enough working planes, with the miracle plane coming; Japan was woefully obsolete by 1944. American approach was to develop to a point, then go to manufacture, allowing incremental improvements afterward. The Mustang and B17 are great examples of aircraft from that approach. The Gato and Balao class submarines won the war in the Pacific, in spite of BurOrd's galactic failure in torpedo design. Germany's only hope for a New York bombing would have to have been some variation on the Doolittle raid of Tokyo, except Germany's planes would have no place to go afterward, and would have to plan to ditch at some predetermined U-boat pickup point, assuming a U-boat could survive long enough.
@HappyBeezerStudios Жыл бұрын
Germany was basically developing their war equipment for the 1950s. All great projects in theory, that would work amazingly well, in theory. From long range bombers to jet fighters to intercontinental missiles to properly armed submarines to the modern assault rifle. All stuff that would come around in the 1950s & 60s. But not stuff needed at that point in a war that was full of wrong decisions to begin with. The only real point in directly attacking the US mainland would be after Europe is secured as a message to stay away. A bit like a mirror to the Monroe doctrine.
@davidweber58334 жыл бұрын
They never really pursued the atom bomb. They considered it “jewish physics.”
@thomaschilcott4 жыл бұрын
Nazi Germany most certainly did pursue the atom bomb! Nazi scientists (including Heisenberg) were working on producing heavy water (Deuterium) in occupied Norway, in a town called Rjukan. There were various saboteur efforts, culminating in an explosives raid on the heavily defended belly of the Vermork Power Plant itself. These attacks were instrumental in denying the Nazis access to Deuterium and thus a nuclear weapon. See "The Heroes of Telemark" for further reference.
@muysli.y18554 жыл бұрын
Jewish physics ? What a bs u read
@nathanhatfield87904 жыл бұрын
I’ve never heard f this Hitler guy but he seems driven.
@bruceghent87764 жыл бұрын
Where have you been living and not heard of Adolph Hitler?
@opoxious15924 жыл бұрын
Me neither. Seems like an inpressive fellow.
@marksides97574 жыл бұрын
The fact that there are two people who have never heard of Hitler is freakin scary. The fact that Education has neglected or deleted this is also freakin scary. To forget, or in this case be ignorant of, history is to repeat it.
@nathanhatfield87904 жыл бұрын
opoXIous and what’s with all the anger that I haven’t heard of him?? So now I need to know every person that ever lived. I’m not saying I agree with everything he did, just that he seemed really motivated
@opoxious15924 жыл бұрын
@@nathanhatfield8790 I don't understand your reply. Why so angry? I'm just confirming your statement. I also never hear about that Hitler guy. I looked him up, and i just said "Hitler"" seems to be quite an impressvie fellow. Nothing More.
@harveydenver83484 жыл бұрын
Fascinating! Great information. I learned a lot from this video. Thank you.
@partygrove53214 жыл бұрын
It took a 1000+ planes to start the Hamburg firestorm and they only had to fly 500 miles. A few of these making cross Atlantic bombing raid on NYC would do squat.
@partygrove53214 жыл бұрын
Though if they did even manage to drop a couple of bombs on Manhattan, that would have caused the US to divert 100s of planes and AA guns to NYC and tied up the City for weeks
@ianmacfarlane12414 жыл бұрын
"the V-2 or America rocket..." What? When was the V-2 referred to as the America rocket?
@NielsC684 жыл бұрын
It wasn't?
@zapfanzapfan4 жыл бұрын
No, the V2 was not the Amerika rocket but there were plans for a two stage rocket where the second stage was a V2. That might have reached across the Atlantic. V2 could reach London if launched from France/Belgium/Netherlands.
@barrierodliffe41554 жыл бұрын
@@zapfanzapfan About 200 miles for the V 2 but terrible accuracy, imagine over 3,000 miles and how far off target it would be.
@modelm773 жыл бұрын
@@barrierodliffe4155 Amerika is pretty big tho. You may drop your V-2 into a lake in Maine but at least it hit Amerika
@hellohun73314 жыл бұрын
In retrospect burning NYC to the ground might have been a good thing.
@theduck38764 жыл бұрын
when you consider what it is now absolutely
@theenglishmajor11984 жыл бұрын
Well I think Seattle would have been a better choice considering the things going on in America today.
@DunedinMultimedia24 жыл бұрын
Nazi much? LOL
@theduck38764 жыл бұрын
@@DunedinMultimedia2 bruh you best be joking
@williamlin20764 жыл бұрын
6:14 is that an American flag I see?
@daveblock40614 жыл бұрын
I thoroughly enjoy your channel, however at 6:16 the engineer's lab coat specifically says "FORD SCHOOL" in FORD script. Thinking many of these old films are from the Consolidated factory.
@grahambell53403 жыл бұрын
The V2 was never an Amerika Rocket .(15.15 into the programme) He must be thinking of the A9/A10 project , This is generally an excellent series