Honda WR-V Malaysia review: Is this Proton X50 rival actually good?

[@syazanadiah87]

I know a lot of people find the interior too simple for the price, but i actually like the simple interior. not too busy like Ativa's.

[@ChrisBird1]

I agree

[@shahtub]

Very good review. I like this guy. Brief and punchy.😊

[@soyacincautv]

Glad you enjoyed it.

[@eljackolito]

awesome vid man! keep it up!

[@nareshsindhwal314]

Thank you for making video in english. Keep going. Love from INDIA❤

[@mahadhirisabinabdullah]

Nice looking on the outside but cheap cheap on the inside... Haiz... City or OMADA 5 lower spec might be a better choice for around the same price?

[@vinodc156]

Very honest review Really impartial Helps a lot for one who aim for purchasing a compact car

[@soyacincautv]

Thank you! It makes what we do worth it. 🙏

[@LexEvans90]

If Honda found Ativa as an opponent... This means Perodua really stepped up their game.... Glad I bought Alza 2022❤

[@mergistribu]

Tapi Alza x pick up. Kurang power :(

[@yu4236]

​@@mergistribu dah nama kereta keluarga, buat apa nak power2.. sedang2 pun cukup..

[@Consoneer]

​@@mergistribuNak pickup beli Ferrari

[@ktwei]

No parcel shelf?? Honda didn't charge enough for some cardboard?? Come on Honda it's basic stuff for NVH.

[@InnerFire6213]

Segment wise it’s a rival to ativa. Just doesn’t have the same tax advantages. X50 rival is hrv

[@rizuan8547]

Wrv less tech gives less headache in future. That's it.

[@raziackzing]

i found out in India its from MYR 45k to 80k. Malaysia toooo expensive then. By Malaysian for Malaysian, Cut throat price.

[@Ibnusaud-f6u]

Due to tax..but our petrol is much cheaper

[@augustineandingwilliamlang7694]

I really like this SUV model, V variant it's good enough & prefer grey colour❤👍😘

[@loserman007]

Personally think Ativa is way more worth it, and Honda City is much refined and comfortable than WRV.

[@0megalul309]

ativa is a tin can if you hit it from the side

[@guestleather9442]

Good video making, thanks bro

[@nhaixin69]

Nice. Better than buying X50. Wrv is less techy but hey, its a Honda. Logo brand plays the biggest role.

[@tengkuhussein3715]

Ativa with 3 cylinders may vibrate a lot after few years

[@anotation2669]

This smaller than vezel?

[@SafianTV]

X50 rival? The seat definitely not same with city. Ayo..

[@idawan09]

personally i will go for Ativa and given the same price WRV , City is the best choice

[@amirnazhan]

For that price? No, it’s not worth it.

[@snociloL]

Bro idk if it's the terrible Langkawi roads OR that car has the stiffest suspension OR he drove pretty darn fast OR the camera stabilization is off/garbage *or even* the mix of everything, the driving part is nothing but wobbly lmao. Like it's so damn much to the point I no longer pay attention to what he's saying.

[@nabillarif]

i had a headache halfway through the video..even the footage from the lead car has some sort of Parkinsons...you go all the way to Langkawi you wd think you will be more prepared

[@coolandcalm131]

Yes I must say the driving part is terrible.

[@Mugenstylo]

For this price might as well get BYD

[@ronaldcapa9195]

waiting from philippines

[@aimanfitri0iv]

it's a very good car and there's nothing wrong it the wrv it's a fantastic car but there's a problem pricing (but some people saying outdated interiors or whatever the reasons of it but come on it's your own choice) 💖😄

[@1on1withthegreatone1]

😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@aimanfitri0iv]

@@1on1withthegreatone1 bruh you know what i don't really care about it to be honest 😒😝

[@yu4236]

Idk about the basic interior.. but i saw that car for the first time in black color, it look good i must say.. i wish i could buy one with cash

[@sobri4928]

X50 : B segment Wrv: compact a segment

[@syukrir.robert8994]

Oh wow, only 160kmh top speed? Ativa managed more with 1.0 Turbocharged...

[@soyacincautv]

Fast, fast go where? But...160km/h top-speed is sad for a Honda.

[@syukrir.robert8994]

@@soyacincautv More like shocked. The fact that wrv have a bit more torque and hp over ativa and yet only manages 160kmh really baffling

[@farisariffin8188]

the interior is a big letdown .. it looks cheap .. tacky .. and nowhere near the x50 if we were to compare ..

[@Commodore_heavywave]

Bring it to ph. I will get one.

[@feyfey88]

10k cheaper I will consider it.

[@DJHiroProductions]

Cx3 for sure

[@don_6996]

To be honest, I'd rather get the FULL SPEC Ativa than any of this WRV models & definitely wouldn't even think of X50 or X70. 🤷🏾‍♂️

[@DemoNinja79]

Me too but the Ativa is kinda ugly looking.

[@don_6996]

@@DemoNinja79 , ada wang so can "make-up" ma & point being is WAY BETTER option than the WRV in all aspect especially on the "value for money" aspect. 🤷🏾‍♂️

[@mojakhaha]

but its not a Honda

[@fazliabdullah5875]

By the way..ativa is small..that's why most of people prefer wrv..also depends on money

[@DemoNinja79]

@@fazliabdullah5875 i agree.

[@sara.cbc92]

Not cheap. Not good.

[@sallehasamad9543]

Interior is too el cheapo. Like a viva. What a let down

[@lcwin1]

For diehard honda fans.

[@moffynaga921]

Terrible terrible soundproofing. And super noisy tyre.

[@insfree]

lol cheap he says

[@whitepolar1127]

expensive, not worth it hoenesyly just like enlarge Myvi. for Safety features please dont touch only electronic system , what about the safety structure , any test report etc, this is way more important when come to collision, this will work to safe live.

[@beingsolo80]

This guy is acting like he's reviewing a BMW. Common. It's a budget mini-SUV.

[@tommykaira8775]

In conclusion, another crap product from Honda.

[@malanirmala3647]

People come out with a product is not that ease but you reviewer easily commenting only that bad side 🙄😡