How atoms bond - George Zaidan and Charles Morton

[@AstronAnimations]

This was far more informative, explained much better and more easier to understand than the classes in school.

[@Sankethskibidi]

Exactly

[@Sankethskibidi]

It's because of animation

[@brassfish13]

yep

[@satyampandey890]

Yessssss, because of that Animation

[@cyipha]

Generally speaking as a parent, school really has progressed tremendously. Content like this is key. The idea that learning must be painful and boring is outdated. History and science are incredibly interesting and dramatic. We shouldn't be ashamed of that.

[@Amir-mh7mw]

When I was in 8th grade I remember studying for a physical science class in which we mentioned nearly everything in this video from how atoms bond to even more complex information on the dynamics of an atom. I remember when I would read my book and study, I could recite the information like I memorized a verse from the Bible, surely my memory did me well when it came to test, however I could not understand or develop a mental model of what I was actually reading. This video creates such a beautiful representation on the actual nature of bonds reassuring my faith in understanding the nature of atoms. Thank you.

[@Pg3d-n5e]

How old are u now?

[@MohammedMohammedgamalabdelazim]

I'm in 8 grade now and we are in the same country 🇪🇬

[@MohammedMohammedgamalabdelazim]

​@@Pg3d-n5e18 maybe

[@abilenevespa]

My son loved this, they are studying ionic,covalent, metallic, and hydrogen bonding in school right now. He said he got more out of this than the power points his teacher uses.

[@kieranmccormack2536]

I really enjoy the animation of the atoms, very clean and understandable.

[@abitgeekie]

You guys are just wonderful. Pictures and animations are great ways to facilitate learning if properly made. Great works.

[@zeeshanAli-no1zx]

@astroferox883 lol bc this comment 10 years old

[@menosproblemos6993]

Analogies like "...and never getting the toy back" and "Like a potluck" makes it SO much easier to visualise the concept! It's things that I've experienced myself and can relate to. Very well! 👌

[@syrup-]

Yes, using analogies can be super helpful.

[@Lovingchannel-f2p]

Hello Ted ED. I am 11 and your videos have made me ace my science classes. My science teacher thinks that I am cheating or something. LOL

[@phucaonguyenhong6275]

Quetzalcoatlus, we share the same fate then, must admit Ted Ed is pretty fun and educational

[@phucaonguyenhong6275]

Good name by the way, Hatzegopteryx is my favorite, although Dimorphodon is a very close second.

[@DCLGposting]

Quetzalcoatlus well you are actually cheating

[@alexwang982]

How?

[@Titanic-wo6bq]

oof is she mad at you?

[@Pendoza84]

This is something i got 16 years ago. Thanks for reminding. Very good explaining. One of your best movies imo.

[@sasser6055]

our teachers try to explain that for us about 4 years and this dude explained it in 3 min and I get it thanks pro I think it is about the animations.

[@_Rick_Astley_]

All i can say is that i have never understood bonds, these gods just described it in 3 minutes, i wish I could like the video twice, actually scratch that i wanna like it infinite times, because you, you have infinitely helped me.

[@ibrahimahmed4008]

Will be in touch with a couple in a week and a bit of time

[@myneus]

This is the 2nd great video from George Zaidan and Charles Morton I have seen this week. Need more teachers like this.

[@sapphire3799]

This is the only way I can understand anything Apart from maybe my History teacher, she's amazing and actually understands that students are people

[@13Gibson87]

This is great coincidence ... We've learned this on chemistry lecture yesterday. But that one took about 1,5 hour and this takes only 3,5 minutes :-)

[@pixius9624]

as a 7th grade, this was still MUCH more helpful than our teachers at school, thanks!

[@Spoods17]

Lewis’s notation explains that more simply

[@angu4878]

Mindddd blown. You have cleared some of my questions of this study session in just minutes. I was losing interest by not getting right help, thankfully, finally the right video.

[@sefron6207]

you taught me in 3 minutes what my teacher couldnt do in 4 weeks

[@LiborTinka]

extremely simplified but yeah - if this were taught this way in school I would get interested in chemistry way sooner

[@fbabka]

best animation on youtube. thank you!

[@msokiedokie123]

Where have you been all my chem life!!! Things feel a lot more clear seeing after seeing this!

[@susanhellmuth3840]

I just love how you use so many different styles of animation 💓 I do have my favorites, but I like all of them

[@fikruazka817]

i still can't picture them with the model of atom in quantum mechanics

[@MrDerhanswurst]

right? how do these both models fit together?

[@locke8847]

Because we cannot see atoms and only their imprint on scanning technology these models are wrong and primitive. Think of it like this.. a giant field of energy that is and isn't at the same time as well as flickering back and fourth between states. All throughout this field membrane are pinches, tweaks, flips, and twists. Because this all is all then it is also parts in retrospection and opposition to being all. To all is part and to part is all. Each atom is and isn't within its own. Each atom is created and exists in relationship to each other atom and vice versa. You define yourself by comparing or sizing yourself up to others or things-situations. This "outside" "other" things define you and help make you be what you see yourself to be. Atoms are the same.. we only know metal by comparing it to water. Water to wood and air to rock.. we learn more about something when we see what it is not and then by deduction and reduction come to a conclusion. Atoms are intersecting waves making waves that intersect and make waves. The center of an atom cannot be seen and the electron signature is the only mystery expression we have of the geni inside. Your mind picks things apart as it's functions are to split energy (ideas-functions) and connect/combined energy. Splitters and or lumpers. If reality is created by our perception and will and reality is atoms and we are atoms then we are conscious atomic reality being funneled down through a human body so that we may do whatever. When dealing with atoms and reality remember.. you ONLY have YOUR perception and or the belief in other's perceptions which is still your perception of their perception. All atoms are one and connected as a single whole. Our minds split and divide in relation to how we feel, think, want or need. Our human specimen of a body does aromatically set some perimeters in perception and application capabilities.. for example we cannot fly by flapping our arms etc. Atoms are also functions too. For example an atom "dancing" becomes and is the dancing. The singing atom literally is only the sound singing. This is how you become what you do and what you do is what you become. Some people like to name things... Some people like to know how things function. Thus things have been named things just because or named things in which they do like a hammer or a screwdriver. Take any thing or idea (all things are ideas and all ideas are things - both are buzzing energy on diff frequencies) and try to define it. Look at the dictionary. Now that word uses other words to explain and de-scribe that word so you gotta go define those words and so on. You will find that words used to explain a word don't have anything to do with that word and those words are made up of other words that only have meaning by bringing in more words without a meaning in theirself. You will deviate far from the original word or even come right back to it! In fact the word you tried to define will end up defining itself by using itself. This is insanity. So when it comes to someone really knowing you or where you are coming from... That is very rare and special. Hope this ramble sum up helps someone. RESEARCH! CORRELATE! LOVE!

[@gamingwithtrikku2371]

Hmm.. Search for Valence bond theory and hybridization. also VSEPR

[@pesti_ja1]

Really excellent video. Could you do one on metallic bonds, please?

[@dncmi1436]

That a very good request

[@bryanturnbow8189]

2:49 Do all molecules of explosive materials have this characteristic? Bonds that break given a burst of extra energy?

[@blazenetwork3749]

This is an excellent visualization of bonding.

[@0olong]

Really excellent stuff - nicely explained and beautifully visualised. My only quibble would be that the tug-of-war in the ionic bonding bit is almost entirely mythical - usually the two ions have already gained or lost electrons long before they meet - but the myth is still a part of standard chemistry teaching, for whatever reason, so, fair enough. :) At least you went straight from there to ionic lattices! Far too many sources stop with 'an ionic bond' forming, as if there was then a molecule of NaCl floating around...

[@angu4878]

Could you elaborate more please? About ionic bonding. Thankyou.

[@0olong]

@@angu4878 I recommend the Royal Society of Chemistry's 'Chemical Misconceptions' on this. If you have any specific questions, though, I'm happy to try and answer them here.

[@wiikia]

woah, still responding after 8 years :O props to u dude

[@osvaldoneto1491]

Incredible animations!

[@TH__TranPhuongQuynh]

Amazing lesson ☺️

[@giuliapasquini979]

Grazie, uso spesso i tuoi video in classe, le animazioni sono stupende e le spiegazioni chiarissime! Sei il mio salvatore!

[@dtf2pgaming982]

Just loved the explanation , thank you sir 😍😍😍💖💖💖

[@confiscator]

Brilliant. Produce more just like this.

[@FewVidsJustComments]

Showed this to my chemistry teacher to show the class one time in high school when they got to the part where they started teaching us about chemical bonds and stuff

[@KimAtkins60]

This explanation is so totally easy to understand! Thank you for your creativity!

[@spandanbarsagade6785]

Thank you this really helpfed me a lot😊

[@abdom.abdellatif4807]

continue simplifying such concepts please

[@gregorymccue5003]

There is no such thing as a pure ionic bond ( unless you count ions dissolved in water or another substance ). Even in Cesium Fluoride, Cesium's outermost electron spends 95% of it's time in the vicinity of the fluorine nucleus, and 5% of it's time in the vicinity of the Cesium nucleus, but not 100% of it's time in either location. Ionic versus covalent bonding is a matter of degree.

[@ajmumbai]

Thank you for this lovely video!

[@hans-jurgenvogel6789]

Great video! Only the depiction of a DNA molecule at 1:33 as an example of covalent bonds feels very confusing or misleading to me because the most prominent bonds seen in this image are the hydrogen bonds between complementary bases...

[@finesseandstyle]

Wish my chemistry teacher could explain like that.

[@whipcram6743]

Hello ted ed this is my homework and this helps so much ty

[@ruddey8488]

At 2:08 you explained how only the outermost electrons would participate in bonding, however for transition metals if the outermost electrons are removed som from other energy levels may participate in bonding as well.

[@kaviruperera6703]

thanks you teach better than even our textbook

[@logan6463]

TED-Ed is AMAZING

[@ferika81]

Thank you so much, I like how you described the bonds.

[@mihaleben6051]

0:56 hey, notice anything? Na is 11th element Neon is a noble gas with 10 electrons Chlorine tries to get to argon, also an noble gas. A lot of molecules wanna be like this. Maybe. I do have data. But there will be exceptions.

[@handsome_potato]

Can you do a video on mainly on Ionic bond and how bonding work with more than 2 atoms

[@NthPortal]

Amazing video!

[@simpsonizer]

This was explained So well that I literally was trippin out! :-P Thanks bunches! Came here for wanting to learn this and you hit the nail on the head, TED-ed!

[@nothat2202]

Great video

[@vinitachaudhary472]

really nice !## please do a video on dot structure and # redox reactions

[@adamjames0710]

i'm doing a university degree in physics and you just described bonds in a much clearer way then my course material lol.

[@ismaelvale4907]

No momento certo Deus fará acontecer ❤❤❤🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@rayzorray4151]

Just luv the way you explain things un this is my favoutite,,In some cases atoms could form more bonds than you would expect but they better have a really gud reason to do so,, . A masterpiece lol .

[@ellifontanilla1520]

Thanks for making this video. It helps me.

[@gert-janroodehal7368]

Nice visuals

[@pigun6960]

How do electrons behave in covalent bond though? Are they trapped in one place and don't orbit own atom nucleus anymore or do they orbit both atoms nuclei?

[@paysonkeown2960]

They orbit both in a shared orbital.

[@miamendez2]

This video taught me so much in 4 minutes than my science teacher did in 50 minutes

[@sapristi455]

I still don't understand everything... If electrons orbit around the nucleus, how can atoms share one ?

[@randomaccount6146]

What the heck that's actually a good question. I'm also extremely confused on how exactly the electrons even orbit the atom since the current observations are that the don't even have a fixed path but have a superposition like wtf is happening ??????

[@paysonkeown2960]

It’s difficult to explain, but when atoms get close, their orbitals can overlap and form molecular orbitals. These molecular orbitals are usually lower in energy than individual atomic orbitals, so every orbital combination forms what we call a bond.

[@TheDanorte]

Really good video, just awesome. But isn't it missing the metallic bonds?

[@haridasmahato4325]

On what basis do elements combine with other elements like in HCl + H2O → H3O+ + Cl- why the reaction doesn't look like HCl + H2O → H3ClO

[@paysonkeown2960]

H3ClO is energetically unstable, so if the atoms were in the position to form this or H3O+/Cl-, they would form the lower energy H3O+/Cl-.

[@scottseptember1992]

How is it wrong? You just said my statement about hydrogen forces vs covalents bonds is true, which implies that covalent bonds are the most abundant type of bonds in DNA. What's in question here isn't about why electrostatic interactions like hydrogen forces and covalent bonds are important, but about which bond is the most abundant and I think I was clear about that. However, you are right about hydrogen forces being important, it's why we have A base pairing with T and G with C.

[@HigherPlanes]

If I had 1 dollar for every atom in a molecule money would be completely meaningless to me. Must be how the 1% feels

[@CLEANDrumCovers]

This was excellent.

[@HeberTisdale]

Great analysis, thank you! I have a quick question: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How should I go about transferring them to Binance?

[@KawaiiiCat]

Thank you for providing such an awesome lecture!

[@manasishivakumar9203]

Thank You so Much !

[@hasanchoukeir2465]

in 3 minutes i learned what my teachers could not properly explain to me in 3 weeks.

[@JBulsa]

The pull of the nucleus keeps them attracted in a different location at all times. good question. watch quantum mechanics for a visual display.

[@Amna-hu6dl]

This was so useful

[@laranjajefessor]

Entao , na ligaçao covalente, o atomo rouba o eletron do outro, assim um ficando positivo e outro negativo, o negativo, para se neutralizar, rouba devolta o eletron, ai ficando infinitamente aleatoriamente?

[@RickyRider35]

forgot to mention that an atom can give away more than one electron to a single atom

[@saradha9567]

RickyRider35. U brilliant

[@DCLGposting]

RickyRider35 Wrong pay more attention

[@stella-pj8wm]

they did in the beginning

[@physicsphysics1956]

The "mettalic bond" term was not claimed until 2014.

[@cimiv]

The entire phosphodiester backbone and the purine or pyrimidine bases are held together with covalent bonds. Hydrogen bonding only enables base pairing between two strands. Without the H-bonds, double-stranded DNA wouldn't form (nor would interesting secondary structures in ssDNA or ssRNA, but that's another story), so they are critical, but you only get 2 per A-T pair or 3 per G-C pair, while each nucleotide comprises more than 30 covalent bonds.

[@TonyMobily]

About 2:43 --- why would they ever bond, if they have the right number of electrons...? Why do the atoms end up "sharing" the two electrons?

[@Eduludwig1]

PERFEITO!

[@salahdaoud9368]

One question: is the pull force exerted by the electron on the proton the same as the force exerted by the proton on the electron

[@frankortiz5404]

Last year my 8th grade science teacher mr pencille always showed us your videos

[@jankopp6005]

i get why two water atoms do a covalent bond, the have the same amount of electrons&protons, but why is the O of h2o not taking away the electrons of the water atoms, it has a stronger "magnetic" force? what am I missing? :D

[@jankopp6005]

figured it out already ^^

[@cybercatcat1696]

awesome bro

[@IstasPumaNevada]

To my knowledge there is no material that completely resists erosion/abrasion. And yes, you can wear through the skin on your hands by rubbing them together enough.

[@noisywan]

Is a scaled up model, a human sized mechanical working simulation of this ever made? I still can't understand how a very small ball rotating around a large ball can attach to another small ball rotating around another a big ball.

[@Sage-bc7iw]

Because of how orbitals and electrons work I'm not sure somebody would be able to make one of those since electrons move so fast and orbitals are so complex and mind bending

[@ruthl9854]

It’s good to learn 🤘🏽🥰

[@SaraKhan-zi6be]

SO GOOD

[@afmartins666]

It's good to be the first one!! Not only to comment, but to watch as well!!

[@lalitasharma6687]

Wrong picture in reality the picture is much different this is just theortical explanation of practical results

[@GlitchedBlox]

Of course it's a theoretical model, what'd you think everything is?

[@kubermazumder7780]

after giving an electron sodium get positively and chlorine get negatively charged .then one negatively charged chlorine and one sodium should eliminate the negative-positive charge. but why sodium ion or chlorine ion paired with six other as mentioned in the video?

[@juwaria4262]

i love this explIaning and tht its fast thanks!

[@SenulD]

Thanks very useful

[@rukhsanakitchenkitchen7745]

Thank you

[@AnniNazhat]

I really appreciate your efforts! A bit off-topic, but I wanted to ask: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (air carpet target dish off jeans toilet sweet piano spoil fruit essay). How can I transfer them to Binance?

[@ahamedakmal7104]

so do electron pair in covalent bonds rotate the nuclei (like other electrons)

[@ShadowKick32]

eletrons dont rotate or orbit at all, it's just a way to represent atoms but it's innacurate. It's just made this way to be easier to explain without using quantum physics.

[@lireggieil5646]

(( quantum physics )) almost as good as the evolution got a question you can't answer that ok just say evolution for example but how sir evolution my boy evolution and if there still and happy smack em with quantum physics and if there familiar with the concept bash them with special relativity basically what im getting at is you will never catch out the author of a story wich is exactly what all of this is starting to look like fiction

[@Zionazism_Is_Bad_Mmkay]

@Reggie Science is hard. You should stick to things like believing in something for no reason, or better yet, in spite of reasons against it. Everything becomes soo simple when you just believe whatever you want. Congratulations, you're well on your way to knowing and understanding nothing, instead of settling for the lesser- only knowing some things (which are verifiable), like dumb science. Remember, the sheep doesn't need Math or Science to be useful to the shepherd.

[@vipxpert]

If we cut matter, why does it doesn't re-bond ://

[@FERCODE-zo3og]

Hello, I'm thinking about doing a huge project on chemistry. I would like to use these animations and give you the credits. would you give me permission?

[@johndoe2]

What if you compiled your code and deleted your project files? It's too difficult to reverse-engineer it!

[@Raantas]

How is ionic bond a bond when its just apart

[@mahendirandamodaran3734]

For once I wished this Chemistry lesson to continue beyond 3 & half mins

[@professionalplus5219]

Anyone in 2024???

[@Randa17]

Yeah 😂👋

[@Pg3d-n5e]

Yeah😂

[@ibrahimahmed4008]

Me

[@EXQCmoi]

How can electrons form pairs within an orbital when both have negative a charge?

[@aprimoramentopessoal9065]

XQCmoi Because of spin. One electron has spin +1/2, an the other -1/2

[@Collins1dan]

lol. Yes. This is due to Quantum Mechanics. Just accept it and move on haha....

[@SchoolTV92]

great. zabrdast... video