How Capablanca Missed The winning Move Badly: Capablanca vs Holman Brooke (1919)

Jose Raul Capablanca
Holman Linnell Brooke
Simul, 40b (1919) (exhibition), Bradford ENG, Oct-07
Queen's Gambit Declined Traditional Variation
Thanks for watching.

[@justinnscanlon]

Always glad for HCV. Thanks from Michigan USA!

[@rodrigoapache2146]

very good ❣

[@briaryos1]

It's hard enough to speak for 11 minutes on a topic you know. But then, to do so in a second language, that's very impressive. Fine job, sir.

[@jeffjones6951]

I'm guessing that English is the Professor's 3d or 4th language!

[@Luckey900]

Thanks Jim Canada

[@zarron221]

Have you heard of this guy? Mikenas vs Schmitt 1931... Mikenas vs Zinner 1931 - Mikenas vs Lebedev 1941... Tks bro!

[@historicalchessvideos8017]

Ok, I will check it out, thanks for the suggestion. 👍

[@Veritifiy]

Solid video please try to talk louder into the microphone because I had to put my volume up and then when I played the next video it was very loud

[@megamuslimchad]

I got the knight check move! However, moves leading upto that is play terribly. Great video!

[@alexisperez4100]

It seems to me that after Capablanca misses the knight check move, his opponent also missed winning the game by not playing rook d8 check and after black queen take and white bishop cover, then black bishop to h3 would have won for black, correct?

[@ytmndman]

Assuming that you mean Re1+ Rxe1 Qxe1+ Bf1, then Bh3 doesn't do anything, white just takes the bishop.