How Charles Darwin FUELED the Murdering of Disabled People

A recent LifeSiteNews.com article outlines how Charles Darwin led the West into a dark age of eugenics. In this episode of Answers News, our hosts Bryan Osborne, Avery Foley, and Dr. Tim Chaffey share their perspectives on this topic as Bible-believing Christians.
Subscribe to us for more biblical content every week.
“For you formed my inward parts; you knitted me together in my mother’s womb.” (Psalm 139:13 ESV)
0:00 - How atheistic Darwinism led the West into a dark age of eugenics
www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/ho...
9:02 - Researchers reveal true crabs' epic ancient odyssey from sea to land and back again
phys.org/news/2023-11-reveal-...
12:42 - Seeing the unseen: How butterflies can help scientists detect cancer
phys.org/news/2023-11-unseen-...
16:21 - Did you hear about speaker Mike and the Dinosaurs on the ark?
www.victoriaadvocate.com/opin...
15:32 - Canada not systemically racist after all, study shows
tnc.news/2023/11/03/canada-no...
19:33 - CAN EVOLUTION CREATE FREE WILL? A NEUROLOGIST SAYS YES
mindmatters.ai/2023/11/can-ev...

[@DeNRCS]

I have a 13 yo with Down syndrome. I can tell you, she has made each member of our family better than we would have been without her. God has used her to change us & change others. Her young life has already had great impact for the kingdom of God.

[@abelflores3752]

My wife is a secretary for a school for students like your child and she always tells me that they are special like an Angel

[@raysearch-iu3fr]

I am a nursing assistant working in Canada. I work in long-term care. People with Down's syndrome are the most beautiful souls I've ever taken care of. Open, loving, trusting and sweet. When I am with them I truly feel the Lord's presence all around me. A priceless blessing!

[@sids5002]

You are literally saying you are pleased that your god gave your daughter an awful illness!!! Wow. That's how warped religion can make a parent. It's utterly disgusting. No comment about the morality of that or the effect on your daughter. Truly disgraceful.

[@rofishy2]

One of my best friends and brother in the Lord had bad Down syndrome. He had to be cared for by his older brother, but he faithfully ushered for our church for over 10 years and I tell you that scripture where it says the dumb speak and the lame leap like a deer, and this who are humble will be exalted are for him and others like him. I look forward to the day where many people will honor him. I always loved talking to him and he would always tease me if I couldn’t make out what he said. I try to be humble in my work to honor people like him because they need love more than the rest of us.

[@fohrum4757]

God has used her? You're okay with a god that can give your kid a mental disability...just to use that disability to make each of you better? Are you serious right now? Seriously? That's awful

[@clintpospichal6498]

Let's celebrate Thanksgiving and give God thanks for our blessings

[@Vernon-Chitlen]

@@Moist._Robot Everyday for the Godly, who can quote confidently: Psalm 139:14 I will praise You, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made; marvelous are Your works, and that my soul knows very well. All 37 trillion cells in my body bearing witness to Him, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Ex 3: 15

[@SK-bw2cv]

Romans 5:12 Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned-

[@StudentDad-mc3pu]

Yes, and since we know this did not happen, Christinity needs a rethink.

[@denvan3143]

So because you have a different opinion, Christianity should rethink things? It appears you’re the one who needs to have a rethink. 😄 😅​@@StudentDad-mc3pu

[@deborahelwoodrealtor8524]

I wish you had made a comment about the deliberate obfuscation in the article you read where it used the words "freedom of worship" when referring to our enshrined freedom of religion. By reducing freedom of religion to "freedom of worship," the secularists are reenforcing the erroneous idea that Christianity has no place in the public square.

[@SK-bw2cv]

12:20 "crabs evolved into crabs" 😂😂😂

[@johncaulfield8935]

Everything evolves into crabs! 🦀🦀🦀

[@ironore1000]

It’s worrying that the people holding such beliefs and with the power to bring such atrocities no longer even know something as simple as the difference between a man and a woman.

[@SK-bw2cv]

11:20 God also filled the seas and rivers with living things on the fifth day of creation. Not just fish but every creature living in the water was created.

[@multivitamin425]

Did god create foraminifera?

[@EternalEmperorofZakuul]

​@@multivitamin425and HIV

[@avafury4584]

When sin becomes utterly sinful, then God brings his judgement.

[@multivitamin425]

Where is the god's eternal love and forgivness then? I dont want to believe in your god, id like to believe in christian god

[@avafury4584]

@@multivitamin425 apparently you don't know anything about the Christian God because he is also a God who judges sin.

[@lindajohnson4204]

​​@@multivitamin425The judgment is against people who have contempt for rhe mercy God has provided them. Jesus came to g9ve His life to save sinners. But people who will not have it, finally will have to be judged, because if God took them to heaven, they'd turn it into a hell, being allied with the devil who so often turns life on earth into hell on earth. God loves them, but He hates the way they have chosen to reject His love, and eventually that rebellion will have to be put down. But many people who have fallen into that rebellion and were almost destroyed by it, have been brought out of it, their hearts cleansed, and in their right minds. Jesus gave his human life to bear their sin, so that they could live with Him forever, and they don't want His mercy or love! So He loves them enough to die for them, but if they will not receive His gift, He will have to judge them, rather than to let them destroy everything throughout all eternity.

[@denvan3143]

@@multivitamin425 the Christian God, namely, the only God there is, has warned us about the consequences of sin, and not repenting towards God, which is eternal punishment. I know that God personally.

[@AdventureUncharted]

Great work as always !

[@SK-bw2cv]

20:30 observational science vs historical science Historical science is not observable and full of assumptions on the past. Wrong assumptions will lead to wrong conclusions

[@sciencerules8525]

Science makes no distinction between "observational" and "historical" science. That is a canard dreamed up by creationists as an excuse to ignore scientific findings they don't like. There is one, count 'em *ONE* scientific method used for scientific investigations. It doesn't matter if the phenomenon being studied occurred one millisecond ago or one billion years ago.

[@stevebert2936]

That's a nonexistent distinction made by AIG in an attempt to split hairs

[@multivitamin425]

They say that god created the world in 7 days, I mean, were they there to confirm it? 😅😅

[@denvan3143]

@@multivitamin425 who said God, created the world in seven days other than you? It states in genesis God created the world in six days and rested on the seventh; you’re not familiar with the subject matter. In defiance of the truth of creation, some scientist claim that the universe began in a hot, dense state, and an infinitely small singularity. Were they there to confirm it? Evidently logic is not your forte. The Bible says “in the beginning“; Edwin Hubble‘s discovery of the red shift confirms the universe had a beginning: science catches up with the Bible. The Bible states, God created all living things; the fossil evidence shows the sudden appearance of life forms, with no ancestral forms as predicted by evolution: science catches up with the Bible. The Bible states, God stretched out the heavens like a garment; astronomical observations confirm the universe is expanding ever more rapidly every second: science catches up with a Bible. The Bible states, the waters were gathered into one place, and the dry land appeared; the sides of plate tectonics has found. There was originally one giant continent, and one giant ocean: science catches up with the Bible. The Bible states, the mountains were thrust up, and the valleys were cast down; play, tectonics, demonstrates strike zones, doing deeds, rest up mountains, subduction zones, create rifts, and valleys: science catches up with the Bible The Bible states, the world in the universe are wearing out like a garment; the second law of thermodynamics states that the level of energy in the universe is going from high to low, and that complexity is degenerating into chaos: science catches up with the Bible. The Bible states that as sin entered the world, it was followed by corruption and death; the fossil record shows the extinction of more than 90% of all life that ever existed on the Earth: science catches up with the Bible. The Bible states, the Earth hangs suspended in nothingness; astronomical observations confirmed the Earth hangs and supported in space: science catches up with the Bible The Bible states, all things are upheld by Jesus Christ, and by him all things consist; the fine-tuning of the universe displays that the laws of physics are tuned exactly so the life as possible, evidence of a supreme being: science catches up with the Bible. Science confirms by observation what we have understood by revelation. Contrawise: evolution is not supported by fossil evidence, it is not supported by genetic science, and it is in contradiction to the second law of thermodynamics.

[@iwkaoy8758]

​@@multivitamin425Creationist never ca11 that science,day ca11 it faith. Ate Theist and Evolutionist ca11 their faith science.

[@avafury4584]

Thank you AIG. This shows us the end result of depraved thinking and the absence of God. Eventually it leads to a reprobate mind and a mind that is so far gone that it is incurable.

[@falloutthewindowcrazy7608]

Nothing is impossible for God

[@sids5002]

This shows that humanism has evolved. We no longer treat sick or deprived people harshly. It literally proves Darwinism works wonderfully!!! Thanks for doing that so clearly. Religions, on the other hand, cause wars and hatred still, as they can't evolve for the better. They are stuck with trying to explain away awful stuff from their nonsensical scripture.

[@falloutthewindowcrazy7608]

@@zealousboar450 you can't get me that easily deceived one

[@falloutthewindowcrazy7608]

@@zealousboar450 only those blinded by the devil would say that

[@denvan3143]

@@zealousboar450 all the years Noah, build the ark he preached to the people to repent, turn from sin to God, or they would be judged. They made their choice. If you claim to “believe in evolution” then you are a hypocrite. You don’t really believe in the survival of the fittest; if you, a family, member, or a loved, one, was seriously ill, you would seek medical attention for them. That’s in contradiction to evolution; according to Darwin, if they can’t resist disease, if they aren’t adept enough to avoid serious injury, then they are not the fittest, and should not survive. But you won’t do that. You are a hypocrite.

[@Grace-nt9cc]

Everyone has genes that are bad or not healthy! 😔 There's hope because God made our bodies with ability to heal. 😪

[@robinlindberg6339]

God made our bodies, the world, everything perfect. We were to be stewards of these gifts. We failed here too, as we allowed the powers of governments and it's big business corrupt the soil, water, and air from almost the beginning. And it's still going on today. Because we have allowed ...the powers of this world, to have their way with our world, we now have the many problems with health, etc. today. Not only that, this unclean earth that we have today has also compounded our health issues...such as the introduction of PHARMAKEIA (A Greek word found in the Bible meaning SORCERY) witch we poison ourselves, the elderly, and children with. Compounding further, we now have elders who have entered into a willful suicide program known as HOSPICE. These pharmaceuticals are given in the end under the guys of "comfort care,"(to put someone down, out of their misery). -Im not a sadist, but it would be nice if people were able to back up their thinking and start asking where we went wrong and how to hold the powers that poisoned our earth responsible. To get our asses up and start acting like the old boycotting hippies minus the free love, and drugs the government brought in to distract them. The example of the old farmer's who gave their children something called chores, gathered together and studied the Bible, and parented the children rather than being their "friend." There was a reason, our parents uttered "the good old days." With each successive generation, our world, and moral decay sinks deeper and deeper.

[@EternalEmperorofZakuul]

Cancer and appendicitis : allow us to introduce ourselves

[@cs5250]

Got gave kids bone cancer

[@imspiker3645]

Unfortunately illness are part of the human condition since this fallen creation is plagued by the corruption of sin. ‭‭ [20] For the creation was subjected to frustration, not by its own choice, but by the will of the one who subjected it, in hope [21] that the creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay and brought into the freedom and glory of the children of God. [22] We know that the whole creation has been groaning as in the pains of childbirth right up to the present time. [23] Not only so, but we ourselves, who have the firstfruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for our adoption to sonship, the redemption of our bodies. Romans‬ ‭8v20‭-‬23‬ But miracles still happen for those who have faith on God's promises and I'm thankful that God healed my lungs.

[@sids5002]

​@@imspiker3645A loving god wouldn't have made up "sin". He's awful.

[@SK-bw2cv]

22:50 people have double standards when it comes to allowing the Christian worldview to be voiced. Everyone has a worldview and bias.

[@settledown444]

Young earth Creationism isn't a Christian worldview. It's held by a small minority of scientifically not educated Fundamental Christians.

[@SK-bw2cv]

14:30 amazing how human beings often mimic the things they find in creation and how Gods creation is so efficient

[@richardgregory3684]

It is not "creation" and it's efficient because evolution through natural selection weeded out all the less efficient versions. But of course, nature is also frequently very INEFFICIENT and flawed.

[@joeg8186]

How many people have died over religion

[@toni4729]

Millions and millions.

[@Trees24310]

your point is? if people die because of "religion" then they arent following that religion, it literally says in the ten commandments thou shall not kill? please do not put the blame on religion as a whole

[@joeg8186]

@@Trees24310 what rubbish that do not kill in most religions is, not your "kind" anyone else you can,

[@VincentMigwi-jy7oi]

What did Hitler Lenin Stalin Pol pot believe?

[@joeg8186]

You are going to say that they were atheists

[@inthelightofhisglory9614]

Love these videos AIG but can you do a few on astronomy and archaeology? 😁 Just a thought

[@toni4729]

Yes, I'd like to hear their fairy stories about that.

[@inthelightofhisglory9614]

@@toni4729 if you don't like it then why listen?

[@toni4729]

Do you like everything you hear? Or do you just close you mind and eyes to things that frighten you? @@inthelightofhisglory9614

[@paulspence7600]

Don't you mean astrology and alchemy?

[@alexandrevaliquette3883]

PLEASE INVITE MATT DILLAHUNTY to your next debate.

[@bpljlb]

He wouldn't waste his time with this lot, to far into the deep end

[@christopherlynass2416]

Glad you good people are highlighting bad evil things in this world God bless you guys

[@terryriley7490]

Sounds like Bill Gates?!?!

[@christinedenton8949]

Love this and making me crack up while learning is a true Blessing!!! 😂

[@rebeckahaubertin3637]

theres lots of wrong assumptions..thinking we can limit God is the primary one

[@toni4729]

Only if you believe in it.

[@noneyabidness9644]

Atheism, and it isn't even close.

[@jonasmlgaard-asmussen9844]

The question of who/what killed more people (atheism or Christianity) is profoundly stupid and simpleminded. It's basically the reverse of the 'my father is stronger than your father' type of argument that 5-year olds make, and it ignores a wide range of issues such as political motivations and basic human greed and cruelty. As such we learn nothing from history if we reduce the mass murders of people who happen to be atheists or Christians to a simple question of their religion or lack thereof.

[@tbccamera1]

Got the calendar by doing your survey in August

[@briancisco1176]

I highly recommend the movie CONSPIRACY (2001), recounting the infamous Wannsee Conference of 1942. "Let us astonish Charles Darwin", is the conclusion of one Nazi as he and his co-conspirators agree to the extermination of the Jews.

[@someguy5438]

Darwin was a jew.

[@Sam-fp8zm]

evidence he was synagogue of satan religion? @@someguy5438

[@user-nt6cs5lg6d]

​@@someguy5438I don't know if that's true or not but even if it's true it would not be relevant.

[@Vernon-Chitlen]

@@someguy5438 Judas was Jew.

[@Vernon-Chitlen]

@@razark9 You do know the title of Darwin's book is: On The Origin of the Species by Means of Natural Selection or THE PRESERVATION OF THE FAVOURED RACES in the Struggle for Life? This encouraged, justified many that there was no God. Survival of the fittest, might makes right.. Abortions increasing exponentially, STD's. God denying communism, socialism, 100+ million deaths from civil wars and genocide. Blaming the Bible for people doing what it doesn't tell them to do is moronic. Like anti gun nuts blaming the gun for it's use in a crime?

[@cherylcatterson4102]

Evilness kills. Righteous does not kill. So there is your answer.

[@Tinesthia]

Evolution actually provides the means to argue against Eugenics, since a population with a high variation of traits best survives changing environments. It is not survival of the strongest, it is survival of the most environmentally fit, and in our environment, cooperation and inclusivity is typically a positively selected for trait. Not to mention in the modern age of technology, while one tries to treat one disability or another we almost always find useful insights and technologies that help the greater population.

[@jackripper5270]

Actually... modern science making it possible for these ppl to pass the bad genes on.... causing a larger amount of the population to be unhealthy. Thanks science

[@stephenolan5539]

Star Trek TNG dealt with this with Geordi a couple of times. He saves people who would have not let him live because of his blindness.

[@denvan3143]

In the first season of Star Trek TNG, the crew finds out their DNA, has been sampled by the dying population of a colony, who are cloning the crewmembers. When it is discovered, the crew of the enterprise pull out their phasers and destroy the clones. Rikers statement was “We have rights over our own bodies.” But the clones were not their bodies, they were new human beings. Technology has allowed society to murder more than 63 million unborn babies since 1972. Technology is neither good nor evil, it is a resource that can be used either for good offer for evil. Evolution has justified the murder of more than 200 million people in the last 100 years. The justification has been “survival of the fittest”, where tyrants determined who were the fittest. Neither statistics, nor history are on your side.​@@stephenolan5539

[@Gabby-bot]

Another vote for videos related to astronomy, astrophyics, and archeology. Also, wondering if you or anyone watching these videos are familiar with Mike Winger, a strong proponent of scriptural thinking. Right here on KZbin!

[@imjustagerl261]

⁠@@Moist._RobotI’m willing to bet that you searched google\ KZbin for other like minded people that share your same belief system for what you would perceive as a contradiction in the Bible to use it as material to prove “ There is no God” , rather than pray to God to reveal the Truth, study it out, read in context, and search the scriptures for the true meaning and your misunderstanding. I’ve seen you comment before on Christian sites, I find it a strange thing that you are so passionate about disproving something that you believe does not exist. Please leave a link to your tearing down Mike Wingers video , So the ones who actually study the Bible can , “ know the truth”. Thanks Bud.

[@denvan3143]

@@Moist._Robot inconveniently, you can’t remember even one of these contradictions? Nice try. 😄

[@denvan3143]

⁠@@Moist._Robot sure ya did, buddy. Did I ever tell you about the time I thought Darth Vader? Cut his hand off. 😄

[@alexandrevaliquette3883]

Can you please invite Aron Ra, a well known atheist that surely can bring more facts in any of your "Answers News".

[@justanotheropinion5832]

Ya these gaslighters need to be confronted with reality. There are some people that actually take them seriously.

[@s3v3n3]

Aron Ra is level 99 Atheist, level 1 philosophy. He's been debunked many times, I doubt anyone is expecting any kind of sophisticated answers from him, only the same argument he brings up in every interview. He's not going to change his mind even if you show him genuine evidence for God, he's not interested in philosophy.

[@s3v3n3]

@@justanotheropinion5832Any other Atheist but Aron Ra, he's not interested in basic philosophy and he only repeats fallacies.

[@HS-zk5nn]

Aron the atheist named after a god 🤡🤡

[@alexandrevaliquette3883]

@@s3v3n3 Can you please give me 2-3 citations of theses fallacies?

[@John-qu8zv]

How many inosent people were tortured and murdered in the name of god for being witches when there is no such thing and consorting with the Devil when there is no such thing and no evidence

[@denvan3143]

Provide the statistics yourself. Here are some statistics to consider: “Between 1917 and 1987, Lenin, Josef Stalin and their successors murdered and were otherwise responsible for the deaths of 62 million of their own people. Between 1949 and 1987, China's communists, led by Mao Zedong and his successors, murdered and were otherwise responsible for the deaths of 76 million Chinese.” Nazi deaths: “An estimated total of 70-85 million people perished” Whatever deaths you made a tribute to religion, it is nothing compared to these hundreds of millions who have been murdered within the last 100 years on the basis of “survival of the fittest”, fascism, the logical outworking of Darwinism.

[@colbullsigh6823]

Really NITHE RAINBOW LIGHTING in the picture you showed at the end of the video! Looked thorta like the Obummer White Houth!

[@SK-bw2cv]

25:40 Canada not racist after all, poll says

[@SK-bw2cv]

09:20 crabs are a creation of God like all creatures

[@toni4729]

Then why don't they go to heaven?

[@davewickizer4506]

I've been saying for a while I'm waiting on my extra arms and legs. I hate the thinking behind evolution and find it as a way for the enemy to cause harm. I have watched Hugh Ross and his buddies dismantle many evolutionarily theories. Reason to believe is a great resource. I also like many other new scientists disproving evolution in recent times. Ken Ham is also another that helps disprove evolution.

[@EternalEmperorofZakuul]

Come back when he removes his rib and asks Yahweh to turn it to a female

[@richardgregory3684]

Why would you grow extra arms and legs?

[@StudentDad-mc3pu]

There is no 'thinking BEHIND evolution' - you have been brain washed. Evolution is a theory that fits the available facts and it has never been 'debunked' by anyone without recourse to one fallacy or another.

[@denvan3143]

Ask at octopus, a squid, a cuddle fish, a spider, a centipede, or a Millipede. ​@@richardgregory3684

[@timokkhan9020]

My comment disapeared. What a surprise...

[@EternalEmperorofZakuul]

Blame this site

[@toni4729]

Every time. I tend to wonder what side Google is on. But I think I know. i would have thought they'd be a bit more broad minded. It seems we hurt too many feelings.

[@denvan3143]

@@toni4729 I have tried several times to quote, Thomas Huxley, Charles Darwins, colleague, and publisher, and I’ve had my comment automatically deleted by Google. Charles Darwins statements are racist, but Huxleys, or apparently intolerable to the Google robots.

[@toni4729]

@@denvan3143 Back in those days people only ever laid eyes on white Europeans. Remember what we did to the others? It wasn't Darwin, it was the Christian world, we were all the same then.

[@jezzamobile]

1940's Germany, 2020's Canada...

[@settledown444]

1850's scientific understanding.

[@EternalEmperorofZakuul]

It wasn't Hitler who snubbed me, it was FDR Jesse Owens

[@denvan3143]

You are aware, Hitler killed, blacks, right? The African holocaust preceded the Jewish holocaust.​@@EternalEmperorofZakuul

[@jameswebb2856]

Crabs walk sideways and Lobster walk straight. Be like Mike.

[@salvadoralvarado8685]

evolution explains that we, humans, share 99.9 percent of our dna, that at a fundamental level we all are the same, homo sapiens, the ones that have invented that we are different are politics and religion

[@denvan3143]

Evolution is a non-scientific. Victorian era notion based on the racist worldview of Charles Darwin. Darwin in his own words: "I could show fight on natural selection [survival of the fittest, natural selection] having done and doing more for the progress of civilization than you seem inclined to admit.... The more civilized so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world." Life and Letters, I, letter to W. Graham, July 3, 1881, p. 316; cited in Darwin and the Darwinian Revolution, by Gertrude Himmelfarb (London, Chatto and Windus, 1959), p. 343. Perhaps you missed the political aspect in the title of Darwin‘s book: “On the origin of species by means of natural selection, _or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life.“_ Evolution is a religion of death. Thomas

[@noble-exploits]

I never di , i always suspexted he was the worst of the cranks.

[@RedCrimson_v2]

Incredible how 2 fools in the 19th century have caused so much damage (CD and KM)

[@katamas832]

They didn't cause any damage, they furthered scientific understanding

[@EternalEmperorofZakuul]

The only damage Darwin was is destroying your faith

[@denvan3143]

@@katamas832 Charles Darwin: "I could show fight on natural selection [survival of the fittest, natural selection] having done and doing more for the progress of civilization than you seem inclined to admit.... The more civilized so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world." Life and Letters, I, letter to W. Graham, July 3, 1881, p. 316; cited in Darwin and the Darwinian Revolution, by Gertrude Himmelfarb (London, Chatto and Windus, 1959), p. 343. Sir Arthur Keith, one of the leading evolutionary anthropologists of our century, said: "The German Fuhrer … has consciously sought to make the practice of Germany conform to the theory of evolution.” Arthur Keith: Evolution and Ethics (New York, G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1949), p. 230. Evil German Mustache Man was certainly attentive to the “science” of evolution. With respect to the question of race struggle, as exemplified especially in Germany, Sir Arthur also observed: "Christianity makes no distinction of race or of colour: it seeks to break down all racial barriers. In this respect, the hand of Christianity is against that of Nature, for are not the races of mankind the evolutionary harvest which Nature has toiled through long ages to produce?" I evolution is a Victorian era pseudoscience based on the racist worldview of Charles Darwin and his peers. It was the basis for Nietzsche’s ideology of the Ubermench, the upper“master races“ and the Untermench, the lower, slave” races. Evolution, survival of the fittest, what is the roadmap for the African Holocaust and after that the Jewish holocaust.

[@StudentDad-mc3pu]

Evolution has exposed the truth that religion is false - think of all the harm religions has done, especially Christianity, over the years.

[@JesusistheonetrueGod]

How does crab evolve into crab cakes and crab rangoon?

[@iveseen1]

By a creative chef?

[@JesusistheonetrueGod]

@@iveseen1 Indeed

[@cptrikester2671]

Sure wish YT would stop deleting good discussion comments. This platform is getting really disgusting. Perhaps it's time to change.

[@EternalEmperorofZakuul]

They won't. You'll be forced to write correctly against your will.

[@cptrikester2671]

@@EternalEmperorofZakuul 'correctly' as in using euphemisms instead of direct language that everyone will understand? Being blunt and to the point is not unacceptable for the weak.

[@EternalEmperorofZakuul]

@@cptrikester2671 yes

[@SK-bw2cv]

17:30 if you believe the bible the secular world sees you as "dangerous"

[@stephenolan5539]

Striving to make Armageddon a reality is dangerous.

[@imspiker3645]

​@@stephenolan5539 Nobody has a say on that, it could be avoided if people accept Jesus but unfortunately we're not heading to that direction. [1] But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: [2] For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, [3] unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, [4] traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God. ‭‭2 Timothy‬ ‭3v1‭-‬4‬

[@stephenolan5539]

@@imspiker3645 There are people who don't want to avoid it. Reagan and Bush talked about Gog and Magog when sending troops to the Middle East. Do you really helieve every Christian group but yours is wrong? Not all just all but one?

[@imspiker3645]

@@stephenolan5539 Hmm, people often use religious rhetorics in politics to hide their true motives for instance the control of ressources in the middle east. Do you believe Lenin who used atheism and created group of militant atheists to persecute their political opponents represents all of atheists?

[@kevinhank17]

People who righteously believe in something that is obviously false are dangerous. Take Hitler for an example, he righteously believed he was doing the right thing the whole time and was closed to rational thought, like most who follow organized religion.

[@marionkerby1154]

What about the Behemoth and the Leviathan - very like dinosaurs as explained by God to Job. 🙏🏼🙏🏼💕

[@valerieprice1745]

How did whaling ships fit the weighty whale oil and bones of multiple whales on whaling ships? There seems to be a limited appreciation for the capacity of wooden cargo ships. Before iron and steel ships, wooden ships were how goods moved.

[@richardgregory3684]

But the wooden ships never reached the siz eof steel ships. They could not.

[@valerieprice1745]

@@richardgregory3684 wooden ships didn't have to reach the size of steel ships. The Ark was about as big as a medium sized container ship. The Chinese also built wooden ships of that size or a little bigger. People today are too used to industrial processes, metals, and plastics. People in the past had skills and knowledge that would blow your mind.

[@richardgregory3684]

@@valerieprice1745 _wooden ships didn't have to reach the size of steel ships_ They couldn;t reach that size. If peopel could have built wooden ships that big, they would have (in fact they tried anf failed) _The Ark was about as big as a medium sized container ship. The Chinese also built wooden ships of that size or a little bigger_ Yes, and they weren;t practical ocean going vessels. They were effectively floating palaces, intended to show off wealth an dpower, and they stayed on lakes and rivers. How many do you think went out on the open ocean for a whole year? lol _People in the past had skills and knowledge that would blow your mind_ But they could not build a workable ship the size the bible claims the ark was. Someone built a replca of that, an dit is sto usntable a 2-meter wave would capsize it. It is therefore not allowed on th eopen esea, but restricted ot inland waterways. And of course this is just one of the hundreds of problems with this deeply silly story.

[@denvan3143]

Yours is a cursory and superficial observation. The ark did not navigate the ocean, it’s simply floated on it. The arc has the same proportions as container ships, which are designed to be the most stable in an ocean environment. Had you lived in 1903 you likely would’ve thought reports about the Wright brothers and their flying machine to be “a silly story.” ​@@richardgregory3684

[@gerardmoloney433]

​@@richardgregory3684 You are deceived in your thinking about the Ark. The Ark dimensions were used in modern ship building because of its stability. And this will be a shock to your deceived mind, Ron Wyatt found Noah's Ark and it was exactly where the Bible said it landed. On the mountains of Ararat in Turkey. It's now a tourist attraction. Don't pay any heed to Atheists because by their own admission they are not intelligently designed. They talk nonsense. Maranatha

[@user-kv3rn4gb5c]

I thought Darwin was a dude since I was 8 years old. I believe it so much that I used to get in trouble in class and get sent to the principal's office because I would debate the teachers

[@montychiton]

Thou shalt not debate thy teachers, even if they try to teach you nonsense! 😂

[@GenericYoutubeGuy]

um, he is a man… why would you get sent to the principals office for saying that if most of the school workers are evolutionists?

[@stephenolan5539]

He was a guy. He made no real difference to history. If he had not existed the Theory of Evolution would have been published a few months later.

[@multivitamin425]

Wait, you sayin he was a girl?

[@jackripper5270]

If a teacher pushes evolution down a child's throat... (as fact) that child will more than likely grow to be an atheist? He was taught early and often that God wasn't needed, God doesn't exist etc.... that's not a good thing, actually close to child abuse imo....

[@SK-bw2cv]

For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. Romans 6:23

[@JoeHTX]

It's very telling that as evil and wicked as charles darwin was and all the damage he did with his theory of evolution, the "church of england" honored him and buried him in the Westminster Abby in London. It's a shame and a disgrace but what more can be expected from a false church anyway?

[@montychiton]

And you belong to the only true church I suppose?!

[@flyingtime5501]

​@@montychitonyes n to understand that you first have to understand what church means. Hint, it's not any particular religion!

[@stephenolan5539]

If he had not existed then the Theory of Evolution would have been published a few months later. And the Theory has advanced since his time and he is not followed.

[@RealHooksy]

They’re all false

[@stephenolan5539]

@@RealHooksy All but one is false doesn't fit their beliefs but that is what they believe anyway. They never consider the possibility that they are all false.

[@adelinomorte7421]

***IS THAT SO ?***

[@GamingWithSpoons]

They are still doing it today or trying to

[@abelflores3752]

Where is Charles Darwin at now?

[@settledown444]

He's buried at Westminster Abbey in London, a place of tremendous honor and prestige as befitting his status as one of the top three scientists of all time.

[@AaronNeedGodNet]

Heaven or Hell, don’t know exactly. Good question tho

[@denvan3143]

@@settledown444 Charles Darwin certainly was admired by Evil German Mustache Man. “The Fuhrer … has consciously sought to make the practice of Germany conform to the theory of evolution.” Arthur Keith: Evolution and Ethics (New York, G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1949), p. 230. With respect to the question of race struggle, as exemplified especially in Germany, Sir Arthur also observed: "Christianity makes no distinction of race or of colour: it seeks to break down all racial barriers. In this respect, the hand of Christianity is against that of Nature, for are not the races of mankind the evolutionary harvest which Nature has toiled through long ages to produce?" Ibid, p. 72 Have you ever read the full title of Darwins book on evolution? Quote on the origin of species by means of natural selection, _or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life.“_ To be an evolutionist is to be a racist and a party to genocide.

[@sgt.grinch3299]

When I discuss these points with people, I’m am labeled as ignorant and wrong. Oh well, I’m off to the next conversation.

[@katamas832]

Well, for a reason. Darwin is no prophet, just a scientist, and we don't take his words for things. And the harm attributed to him here were people misapplying the science he did.

[@denvan3143]

@@katamas832 what science did Darwin do? He promised the fossil record would support his theory of evolution; 160 years later that evidence has never been found, rather the contrary: more than a dozen new body plans have been found, which, along with the rest, have no ancestral forms to justify believing in evolution. It is it misapplying Darwins science that has led to catastrophe for millions of people, it is what he plainly stated concerning his theory of evolution. Charles Darwin: "I could show fight on natural selection [survival of the fittest, natural selection] having done and doing more for the progress of civilization than you seem inclined to admit.... The more civilized so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world." Life and Letters, I, letter to W. Graham, July 3, 1881, p. 316; cited in Darwin and the Darwinian Revolution, by Gertrude Himmelfarb (London, Chatto and Windus, 1959), p. 343. Evolution is a Victorian era pseudo science based on the racist worldview of Charles Darwin and his peers. I can’t even reproduce hear the statements made by his colleague, Thomas Huxley, because I have found by experience KZbin auto deletes the continent because it is so abominably racist, specifically towards Africans. Nietzsche based his ideology of the Ubermench, the upper, superior “master“ races, and the untermench, the lower “slave“ races on Charles Darwins theory. Evil German Mustache Man integrated the ideology of evolution into his German society; it was the roadmap for the African holocaust, and after that the Jewish holocaust.

[@StudentDad-mc3pu]

@@denvan3143 Well that's a load of B. First of all, he never promised anything of the sort, in fact he was worried that the gaps in the fossil record were a problem. We now know that fossilisation is extremely rare, however we do have shelves full of transitional fossils.

[@EternalEmperorofZakuul]

​@@denvan3143let's bring up the Jewish role in the Bolshevik revolution. I'm sure you can blame evolution for their role in mass murder and untold suffering in the Soviet union

[@denvan3143]

You have been lied to; there are no “shelves of transitional forms.“ There does not exist the case for claiming the transition of even one life form into another, not one, for plant, animal or human being. If there was even that one books would be filled with it, TV, specials, videos, and movies will be made about it in the evolutionists would make sure you knew the name of the species. But you don’t because it doesn’t exist. And yes, Darwins theory depended entirely upon the eventual uncovering of the fossil evidence he described in his book on evolution. He did, indeed, outline the problems of this required fossil evidence, and that he did not see gradations of species within the Cambrian layer, nor ancestral forms in the pre-Cambrian That would result in what was found in the Cambrian later. It is a pathetic excuse to say that fossilization just didn’t happen; it’s Darwin, saying yes, these creatures existed. We just don’t have the evidence. That isn’t science, that’s philosophy. “Science is the culture of doubt.” Richard Feynman. Evolution is not science, it is a religion that one is not allowed to doubt. ​@@StudentDad-mc3pu

[@DarkMando20]

Who would have though a Speaker of the House in a country that was founded on biblical standards would be in the wrong for believing the Bible? On what planet does that make sense?

[@richardgregory3684]

"biblical standards"?

[@pj87iam]

Survival of the fittest I support that law of nature. Humans try to fight nature and see what happened? All sorts of problems

[@denvan3143]

So in light of “survival of the fittest” if your wife or child had a serious illness, and they could be saved my medical treatment you would refuse it, right? Literally billions of COVID-19 vaccinations have been administered in the past three years; statistically, nobody believes in survival of the fittest, because they want to survive whether they are fit or not to do so. What you believe is expressed in your actions. You don’t believe survival of the fittest, you don’t believe evolution.

[@MartinAsh785]

The pure evil going on.

[@alexandrevaliquette3883]

0.00 "Which kills more people: atheism or Christianity?" It seem like you are afraid to get a fair debate on that great question... Maybe you could have bring an agnostic historian to get the other side of the medal? I'm sure there is plenty of agnostic historian on KZbin that will love to be on your show. Thumbs down for your lack of fairness in this video.

[@katamas832]

That's just gonna devolve into the Christian conflating Communism with atheism, and the actions of atheist with atheism regardless of what it was actually based on, they just fabricate motivation. It's a frustrating conversation I recommend you avoid 😅

[@denvan3143]

“Between 1917 and 1987, Lenin, Josef Stalin and their successors murdered and were otherwise responsible for the deaths of 62 million of their own people. Between 1949 and 1987, China's communists, led by Mao Zedong and his successors, murdered and were otherwise responsible for the deaths of 76 million Chinese.” Nazi deaths: “An estimated total of 70-85 million people perished”

[@marcywilson207]

Sea turtles go on land and back to he sea several times in their lives.

[@truthwithbaba777]

The poor were actually more prolific than the wealthy, which led to many laws.

[@mclovinit8639]

I absolutely love watching Darwin Awards.

[@solideomusical]

Love the show idea but I will need you guys to talk in turn to earn my listenership. The cross-talking was pretty bad and does the listener no favors. Thank you

[@timetraveler0002]

do one on flat earth

[@Alien1375]

Already debunked on Gutsick Gibbon's channel.

[@marcj3682]

He was a freemason. Check out what that really means.

[@gissie391]

He wS doing "projection"claiming natursl selection which fails to take account of motive.

[@poliincredible770]

No doubt darwinism has deadly consequences and deserves to be expelled from the classroom! Statistics show students perform much better in environments where they are taught to love our neighbors as ourselves, as opposed to survival of the fittest.

[@poliincredible770]

@@globalcoupledances sure we can. Our physical attributes and capabilities are the results of DNA. What is DNA? It is highly coded information. Anytime we see a code we know it came from a code maker, not random natural occurrences. We are bipedal because the code for bipedalism was input into our DNA by our Creator. No scientist has observed a code that can transition a knuckle walking organism into a bipedal organism. Please accept observable science and documented history; proclaim Jesus as your Lord, believe in your heart that God raised him from death and you will be saved (Romans 10:9).

[@globalcoupledances]

No. The first human was also a knuckle walker. Bipedalism is the result of natural selection. Explain why that was selected!

[@sciencerules8525]

@@poliincredible770 _Anytime we see a code we know it came from a code maker, not random natural occurrences_ That is simply not true. We know of many natural processes which encode information. Tree ring widths encode information about the local growing conditions. Spectral lines in starlight encode information about the chemical composition of the star. Similarly DNA encodes information about an organism's local environment.

[@EternalEmperorofZakuul]

​@@poliincredible770because if I went to a school filled with different races, some who are more violent, I have to say love thy neighbor as myself when they assault me

[@poliincredible770]

@@EternalEmperorofZakuul would you care to name the races you consider more violent?

[@TheRealRomansThirteen]

In Wolves the biblical allegory for evil, the sick lead the pack. Evolution can take out their relatives, and loved ones first. They won't.

[@enricoabrahams5061]

I love that point about 15 minutes in regarding the Scientific Method...Evolution doesn't follow the scientific method either, so what makes Evolution more "scientific" than Creation?

[@katamas832]

It does follow the scientific method

[@enricoabrahams5061]

@@katamas832 how?

[@katamas832]

@@enricoabrahams5061 It does do observation, hypothesis formation, testing the hypothesis and refining the hypothesis depending on the result.

[@enricoabrahams5061]

@@katamas832 how does it test something that is supposed to happen over millions of years?

[@katamas832]

@@enricoabrahams5061 Testing just mean going out in the wild or into a laboratory to experiment with something. It also includes creating predictions. You form a hypothesis, and instead of doing an experiment, you just make predictions based off of it, and whether those predictions become true or false is the test. It's basically what we do in labs or in the wild, but in a less direct manner. Instead of an experiment having a predicted outcome, we have future findings having predicted outcomes. And this isn't special to Evolution, this is done with Einstein's relativity as well. With gravitional lensing being a predicted observation. Black holes were also never observed up until recently, but were very much predicted based on immense gravitional pulls, and we predicted it so well that what we found matched simulations of what we should be seeing perfectly. It's also likely done in many other fields I am just not aware of them.

[@heinpereboom5521]

These disturbing stories are unfortunately also known in my country (the Netherlands). Older people and disabled people are already less important here in shelter and healthcare. The law also stipulates when someone is dead and their organs can be removed without anesthesia. People who have a different opinion are always accused of a conspiracy theory and not based on their opinion, but always personally attacked. The story of the crab is really laughable, but in the Netherlands too, many scientists are paid for nonsensical research that should confirm the atheistic view of our government. Scientists come up with research here for which they know they will be paid for in the long term. If people wanted to understand that evolution is impossible because no information can be added and that there are different species from creation, then there would most likely be far fewer atheists. Unfortunately, people are led to believe that everything happens by chance, so it is very strange that they do trust their brains. People only believe in evolution because then there is no need for God, they prefer to deceive themselves by believing things that are not possible. A large part of our population, mostly atheists, believe everything that is presented several times in the media, just indoctrinated people. It is also mandatory in schools to teach evolution as the only way in which life originated. You can convince children of all kinds of things and it will be very difficult for them to get rid of it later. Atheism is being cultivated here and thinking about it is forbidden. "If you repeat a lie a lot, it will automatically become the truth." That was a statement by Dr. Joseph Goebels, Hitler's propaganda minister. He was more than right, I can still see his face, when he continued to tell his lies at the end of the war and knew for a long time that it was a lost cause. He could no longer go back on his statements and money and social position were the main motivations for his atheist actions, as with all other NAZIs. Atheists are not interested in the truth, only in self-made truth.

[@richardgregory3684]

How do you anaesthetise a corpse? Evolution does not require "information to be added" any more than you need to addletters to the alphabet to make new words. But of course "information" IS added...all the time. Evolution does function "by chance".

[@jackripper5270]

I agree... I have lots of young ppl argue with me in the comment section. And almost 100% of the time, they treat evolution as fact. They mock God for being a stupid theory of creation... cause there is no proof, yet, they will believe in evolution.... which has no proof??? But they "act" like it's been proven true... its very disheartening.... I try and tell them, evolution makes No sense... but thay don't want to hear it. In their mind they're "right" .... but it couldn't be further from the truth. Non life will never create life (why would it) all life has purpose... yet, it started by accident? And yes, like you said... we actually lose info in our DNA over time, we don't gain "new" info.... i would advise all atheist to watch Dr. Jason Lisle "how science proves biblical creation " on youtube....

[@wim907]

evolution has a lot of evidence, you can see it happening in many things like microbes and viruses, denying evolution is just stupid @@jackripper5270

[@richardgregory3684]

@@jackripper5270 _they treat evolution as fact_ Because it is. _Non life will never create life (why would it) all life has purpose... yet, it started by accident_ Evolution never sought to explain the origin of life, that's abiogenesis.

[@manthanoepignosis1560]

@@richardgregory3684 Genetics has it's limits. There is only a finite amount of genetic material (nucleotides) to work with in any given generation. Depending on the environmental factors, certain hereditary traits may be favorable for an organism's survival and thus, reproduction of offspring to continue passing down these favorable traits (natural selection). The organisms that do not possess these favorable traits, suitable for the environmental conditions, will not be "selected" and will eventually perish, thereby limiting the gene pool for that population. In order for any organism, otherwise unfit for survival, to survive, it would need additional genetic information that it did not originally possess and that genetic coding would have to be specifically oriented to allow for favorable traits to emerge, thereby increasing its chances for adaptation and survival. This means that natural selection is an ineffective mechanism for evolution in terms of increasing the variety of species. it actually limits and bottlenecks the gene pool. This is one of the main reasons Neo-Darwinism, and it's core belief of mutations leading to the assumed novel genetic information necessary to allow for more favorable or fitting traits to emerge within an organism, is considered. However, mutations are deleterious almost always, and in some cases unharmful. In very rare cases are mutations beneficial and the detected benefits come at a trade off with side effects. Neither process of natural selection or point mutations leads to novel information being introduced to the genetic code. The genes passed from generation to the next are finite and the sequences that arise from them can only use the limited coding provided. The genetic studies involved in tracing back the human genome demonstrates that the farther back in time we trace our genes, the more complete the coding was. This is because of deleterious mutations slowly erasing our genetic blueprint over time. Increasing entropy applies to everything in our natural universe. For instance, all dog breeds are traced back to wolves. Wolves have the most complete genetic material available to breed other dog breeds. The other dog breeds are literally lesser, in a genetic sense, than a wolf. Nothing in nature could ever select or mutate a poodle back into a wolf, even in millions of years. time is not the hero of the plot. It is the backdrop upon which increasing entropy occurs. Each successive generation of an organism is losing genetic material...its a net loss, not a net gain. If left to only natural processes, separated from any modern medical interventions and nutritional advances, we humans would certainly show what overall genetic deleterious mutations accomplish. So although change does occur, it doesn't mean that there is overall improvement in morphology and health/fitness. The extinct organisms, some of which are demonstrated in the fossil record buried in a mass cataclysm ages ago, are not a record of genetically inferior or unevolved organisms from the past. More so they are a record of some very superior genetic specimens, extremely fit for survival in their once thriving ecosystems that just couldn't survive the cataclysm of their day. We are devolving.

[@RussellGrantAppling]

Is it not the times of judgement?

[@rickallen9167]

Let us try and apply in situ. In 1883, one year after Darwin's death, his half- cousin Francis Galton gave his research a name:Eugenics. Galton had read his half-cousin Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, which sought to explain the natural development of plant and animal species, and desired to apply it to humans. Based on his biographical studies, Galton believed that desirable human qualities were hereditary traits, although Darwin strongly disagreed with this elaboration of his theory. Charles Darwin was not an Atheist in the true sense, he was atheistic of the monotheistic Christian God. He was however, a Deist(empirical reason of nature in a supreme being who does not necessarily intervene). If you or I were responsible for writing an explanation on how any tree grows well, does it follow therefore we are also responsible for anyone who suggests you should begin pruning any tree? No, of course not. The go-to tool from the Creationist tool box is Retrospective Evidentialism...monotheistic belief based on faith alone alongside claimed scientific support.

[@SK-bw2cv]

19:00 dinosaurs on the ark were likely smaller (babies)

[@montychiton]

Anything to fit them in... toddler dinos?

[@SK-bw2cv]

@@montychiton I'm sure God is wise enough to know what can fit inside of an ark that He gave the dimensions for. 🤔🤔🤔🤔

[@RealHooksy]

There was no ark

[@montychiton]

@@SK-bw2cv He gave nothing, as god does not exist. But even presuming that he exists, the ark is impossible, even if you rebuild it like Ken Ham did, the numbers do not add up. It is just impossible. You might wish it to be true, but it isn't. Unless god used a miraculous trick to achieve it, but that is nowhere stated in the bible...

[@montychiton]

@@SK-bw2cv If such a god existed he would be wise enough, and if so he would need many arks to fit all in. But here we are talking about scriptures written by people at least 2000 years ago. Their understanding of basic biology, hydrology and geology was almost non-existing, so what remains is an interesting story. Why do you (and quite a few christians) have to believe that everything in the bible is literally true? Without that your faith would crumble?

[@RussellGrantAppling]

I am the authority between life and death. .

[@toni4729]

Merry Christmas Sunshine.

[@ProlifeOvovetarian]

I support the invidual choice to volunteer to have your tubes removes like I did it was only my choice originally for health reasons by to Tatrterus with Eugenics. Jewish and black folk were targeteted according to some soures and that was wrong to to do them to any person.

[@RussellGrantAppling]

Period and no one can say different

[@HS-zk5nn]

chuck misled so many. only if he knew science

[@HS-zk5nn]

@@Moist._Robot chucki dee

[@appaloosa42]

This must be generated by a computer troll. Ignore it.

[@HS-zk5nn]

@@appaloosa42 yes moist is a bot

[@StudentDad-mc3pu]

The sheer nonsense of your comment is breathtaking. You certainly don't know science.

[@samburns3329]

@John-kj5wh You've never take a college level science class in your life, right?

[@alexandrevaliquette3883]

In the thumbnail you wrote: "We must stop listening to Him. How charles Darwin fueled the murdering of disable..." If most of what Darwin's work make sense and some of it doesn't. Why should we discard 100% of what he said? Should we just take the useful side of his work and be caution to avoid the bad side of it? Your team seem to lack critical thinking. BEWARE: Maybe read on cognitive bias before answering my comment.

[@denvan3143]

Charles Darwin: "I could show fight on natural selection [survival of the fittest, natural selection] having done and doing more for the progress of civilization than you seem inclined to admit.... The more civilized so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world." Life and Letters, I, letter to W. Graham, July 3, 1881, p. 316; cited in Darwin and the Darwinian Revolution, by Gertrude Himmelfarb (London, Chatto and Windus, 1959), p. 343. Evolution is a Victorian era pseudoscience based on the racist worldview of Charles Darwin. He’s promised that the fossil record would confirm his theory of origin of species never materialized; 160 years of phylogeny does not support Darwins theory. 60 years of genetic science does not support Darwins theory. Evolution is in contradiction to the second law of thermodynamics. Darwins observation of descent with modification, and the production of phenotypes was neither new nor groundbreaking; breeders of domestic animals knew about this, and exploited it for centuries. Darwin observed the results of selective breeding, and how markedly different phenotypes could be from their progenitors; that is why he called his theory, natural selection, as opposed to selective breeding. But Darwin either ignored or ignorant of the findings of the breeders. Breeding phenotypes passed a certain point has one of three results: (1) the offspring are sterile, do not reproduce, and this, or a roadblock to evolution. (2) the offspring, diet birth, or do not survive to adulthood to reproduce, another roadblock to Evolution. (3) the offspring, revert to type, display all the characteristics of the progenitors rather than the phenotypical elements, the third roadblock to evolution. Descent with modification is observed in nature, and as stated above before exploded by breeders; descent with modification or micro evolution does not accrue to macro evolution; the fossil record bears this out. Lifeforms appear suddenly in the fossil record with no ancestral forms. Darwin was aware of this, and admitted as much in chapter 9 of his book on evolution. In it, he stated there was no evidence of gradations of species within the Cambrian layer no evidence of ancestral forms in the pre-Cambrian layer, that would explain the lifeforms found in the Cambrian. Darwin explained this in terms of the need for more sampling, i.e., more digging in the dirt, more chipping at the rocks to find those “missing fossils“. 160 years later, there are no ancestral fossils. Additionally, 17 new body plans have been found with new ancestral forms, which place is even more weight on Darwins shoulders - or rather, on his coffin. Darwins theory of evolution has added nothing to scientific knowledge; anything you can attribute to medicine is research into life as it exist on earth. Now, it has nothing to do with extinct life forms. The legacy of evolution is that “survival of the fittest” has provided the alibi for tyrants and psychopaths to murder more than 200 million people in the past 100 years. In discussions with evolutionist over the past four decades, I have found a little or no recognition in evolutionist, that they understood anything of what they were told; cognitive dissonance, and the lack of critical, thinking, indeed.

[@alexandrevaliquette3883]

Hi @@denvan3143​, I'm not an expert on Darwin, so I've ask ChatGPT about your comment. It's faster to debunk weirdo and seem quite good analysis overall. Chat GPT enter the chat, lol: The comment you provided contains a mix of statements that are true, false, or need clarification. Let's break down some key points: Charles Darwin's Quote: True: The quote from Charles Darwin appears to be accurate, and it reflects some of the social views prevalent during the Victorian era, including notions of racial superiority. Evolution as a Pseudoscience: False: Evolution is not considered a pseudoscience. It is a well-established scientific theory supported by a vast body of evidence from various fields, including paleontology, genetics, and comparative anatomy. Fossil Record and Phylogeny: False: The claim that the fossil record and phylogeny do not support Darwin's theory is inaccurate. The fossil record shows a pattern of descent with modification, and phylogenetic analyses support the relatedness of different species. Genetic Science and Darwin's Theory: False: The statement that 60 years of genetic science does not support Darwin's theory is incorrect. Genetics has provided substantial evidence supporting the principles of natural selection and common descent. Evolution and the Second Law of Thermodynamics: False: The assertion that evolution contradicts the second law of thermodynamics is a misunderstanding. Evolution does not violate the second law, as Earth is not a closed system. The second law applies to isolated systems, and Earth receives energy from the sun. Selective Breeding and Darwin's Theory: True: Darwin did observe the principles of selective breeding in domestic animals, but he extended these ideas to propose a natural mechanism (natural selection) for the evolution of species over time. Sterility, Survival, and Reversion in Breeding: Needs Clarification: While the comment mentions potential roadblocks to evolution in breeding (sterility, survival issues, reversion to type), it doesn't accurately represent the complexity of biological evolution. Macroevolution and Microevolution: False: The claim that macroevolution does not accrue from microevolution is not supported by current scientific understanding. Macroevolution is considered the cumulative result of microevolutionary processes over extended periods. Darwin's Recognition of Gaps in Fossil Record: True: Darwin did acknowledge gaps in the fossil record in his works. However, subsequent discoveries have filled in many gaps, and the fossil record provides substantial evidence of evolutionary transitions. Evolution's Contribution to Scientific Knowledge: False: The claim that Darwin's theory has added nothing to scientific knowledge is unfounded. Evolutionary theory has significantly contributed to understanding the diversity of life, genetics, and various biological processes. Survival of the Fittest and Historical Atrocities: True: The statement linking "survival of the fittest" to historical atrocities is a perspective held by some, but it's a matter of interpretation rather than a direct consequence of the scientific theory of evolution. In summary, while the comment includes some accurate historical quotes from Charles Darwin, many of the subsequent assertions are either misleading, inaccurate, or reflect a misunderstanding of current scientific knowledge about evolution. Alex is back in the chat: Sure, you can argue that Chat GPT is BS and all, but I invite you to debate with him, not me! Stop wasting people's time. Get properly educated on science and ditch pseudoscience and unreliable sources.

[@frosted1030]

Do you expect lieing to people like this is somehow going to miseducate them? There are better sources than your superstition.

[@frosted1030]

@@zealousboar450 " theres a big problem there, your using critical thinking skills." Control? Child-like attachment to doctrine? Attacking Darwin has no affect on evolutionary biology, not sure they get this.

[@denvan3143]

The Bible states “in the beginning, God created the heavens and the Earth”; Edwin Hubble’s discovery of the red shift demonstrated the universe had a beginning: science catches up with the Bible. The Bible states, God stretched out the heavens like a garment; astronomical observations confirm the universe is expanding and evermore rapidly every second: science catches up with the Bible The Bible states God created all living things; the fossil record confirms lifeforms appeared suddenly, with no ancestral forms that would indicate evolution: science catches up with the Bible. The Bible states that with sin, corruption, and death, enter the universe; the second law of thermodynamics states that energy in the universe is descending to a low level, and that complexity is the king into chaos: science catches up with the Bible The Bible states, the waters were gathered into one place in the dry land appear that; geologist determine there was once one giant continent, and one giant ocean: science catches up with the Bible The Bible states, the mountains were thrust up in the valleys were cast down; plate tectonics confirms that strike zones, reduce mountain ranges, subduction, zones, produce, deep valleys, and rift: science catches up with the Bible. The Bible states, the Earth hangs suspended in nothingness; astronomy caught up with the Bible. The Bible states that Jesus Christ of holds all of creation and buy him all things consist; Frederick Hoyles, discovery of fine-tuning, that the laws of physics must be exactly as they are for life to exist, is evidence of a supreme being so design, those laws of physics: science catches up with the Bible. Charles Darwin stated the origin of species by means of natural selection; no evidence has been found in the fossil record to support this in 160 years, genetic science does not support evolution, and it is in contradiction to the second law of thermodynamics. The Bible for 5000 years has told us things that science confirmed, Darwin has taught us nothing other than the Fascism of survival of the fittest; that is not science, that is ideology.

[@denvan3143]

@@zealousboar450 critical thinking skills, depend on having actual information, of which both of you appear to exhibit a paucity.

[@gissie391]

Problem is Im not disabled mentally i was above average untrlligence ,cdlling people mrntally ill is devious form denial of abuse etc .nhs drs socisl servicesdo this odd how thicker people fdll for this claiming they are more intrlligrnt thsn us sah we mentally ill.itsalso part of gorced adoption calling mothersstupid taking out children to do better job .odd as if my son is brightest in class his mother might also be

[@denvan3143]

Those of us who have been labeled “the uneducated“ have closely observed these people; the academics can’t answer the question “what is a woman“?“ Nor can their students; products of this college education, who become the heads of corporations, like Bud Light, target, and Disney have suffered a financial disaster. You can tell a tree by the kind of fruit it produces. Those who have labeled us “uneducated” have proven to be an orchard of stupid fruit.

[@tbccamera1]

How Dare Speaker Johnson send money to Israel our ally by not funding more IRS agents to give us a hard time

[@mikebosler7516]

Repent and believe the gospel. Everybody needs Jesus. Only Jesus can save lost sinners. Jesus wins the devil loses be on Jesus's side.

[@--..-...-..-.--....]

🧟‍♂️🧟‍♀️

[@luish1498]

Repent and believe the gospel. Everybody needs flying spaghetti monster. Only flying spaghetti monster can save lost sinners. flying spaghetti monster wins the devil loses be on flying spaghetti monster's side.

[@RussellGrantAppling]

Period.

[@katamas832]

Typical aig, conflating Social Darwinism with Darwinian Evolution, when Social Darwinism was a gross misrepresentation of Evolution. It's like critizicing the average Christian for Jehova's Witnesses.

[@stephenolan5539]

The bigger problem is using appeal to authority and thinking Science does the same. No one believes something because Darwin said it.

[@denvan3143]

Darwinism and social Darwinism are one and the same; in Darwins own words: "I could show fight on natural selection [survival of the fittest, natural selection] having done and doing more for the progress of civilization than you seem inclined to admit.... The more civilized so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world." Life and Letters, I, letter to W. Graham, July 3, 1881, p. 316; cited in Darwin and the Darwinian Revolution, by Gertrude Himmelfarb (London, Chatto and Windus, 1959), p. 343. If you have not researched, Darwin, somebody told you that Darwinism and social Darwinism we’re not the same thing; they lied to you, and you believed them.

[@denvan3143]

Millions of people believe evolution, because Darwin said it. And science doesn’t “do“ anything; science is not a sentient entity, capable of expressing thought, science is a process in which people engage. Science never told anybody anything and not every statement by a scientist is a statement of science. Charles Darwin stated vast numbers of the “Lower“ races would be eliminated by the “upper“ civilized races. That was a particularly bloodthirsty opinion concerning race, struggle and yes, he was most definitely talking about human beings. ​@@stephenolan5539

[@stephenolan5539]

@@denvan3143 You are the one listening to liars. Scientists do not follow appeal to authority. Anything that Darwin said doesn't matter to them. What matters is evidence.

[@stephenolan5539]

@@denvan3143 If anyone told you that Darwin is held up as an authority, they lied to you. Science doesn't work that way.

[@RussellGrantAppling]

Good bye

[@timlist4173]

I never listened to him or his disciples. Darwin was a fool.

[@jackbeckley5513]

What do you say about the smart people that buy jeans that barely have enough thread left to cover their butts

[@devasharma5478]

capitalism

[@user-nt6cs5lg6d]

Evolution will eventually be used to deceive the world during the great tribulation. That we can "evolve" into a higher level of thinking.

[@user-nt6cs5lg6d]

@@razark9 I guess you've never read exactly what will happen during the great tribulation and you think I want to be a part of that? Not a chance.

[@stephenolan5539]

​@user-nt6cs5lg6d Why is the Bible so ineffective? How many people total understand it accurately? Divide that by the World population.

[@denvan3143]

@@razark9 men of the Christian faith like Galileo Galilei, Johann Kepler, Isaac newton, John Maxwell, and Michael Faraday were foundational to modern science; they looked for laws of nature, knowing that God is the law giver: God made moral laws to keep life for being chaotic, and he also made a physical laws to keep the universe from being chaotic. That is why they are called “laws of nature” and “laws of science.” Others of the Christian faith, who were influential, scientist, and philosophers: Nicholas Copernicus (1473-1 543) Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1627) Johannes Kepler (1571-1630) Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) Rene Descartes (1596-1 650) Blaise Pascal (1623-1662) Gregor Mendel (1822-1884) William Thomson Kelvin (1824-1907) Max Planck (1858-1947)

[@johnsandoz-nb5xk]

Im the 667th person to like this video.

[@toni4729]

Why? It's rubbish.

[@toni4729]

But of course you are saying the exact same thing by putting yourselves at the top because you only believe the human being will go to heaven. Other creatures miss out on God.

[@zorot3876]

Darwin also encouraged racism. The clue is in the title of his book.

[@katamas832]

How about instead of reading the title of the book, you read the book? You know, the book that is talking about races of CABBAGES, as Darwin used race in it like we use subspecies and never mentioned human races in the book?

[@zorot3876]

@@katamas832 Races of cabbages? That's a good one 🤣 Talk about being naive. I have read his book where he, like those who came after him, completely failed to explain the origin of species.

[@katamas832]

@@zorot3876 Origin of species, page 12 "the several races, for instance, of the cabbage" You clearly didn't read his book. Or you paid zero attention. Because he never mentioned human races. And it explains the origin of species pretty well. Of course, modern evolutioniary theory does it waaaay better.

[@zorot3876]

@@katamas832 Very good, it was a while ago. I meant to mention his second book The Descent of Man. In it, he theorized that man, having evolved from apes, had continued evolving as various races, with some races more developed than others. Darwin classified his own white race as more advanced than those “lower organisms” such as pygmies, and he called different people groups “savage,” “low,” and “degraded.”

[@katamas832]

@@zorot3876 Now The Descent of Man. most certainly fits that However he didn't encourage racism as far as I know. He was describing his ideas. Darwin was most definitely racist, but his ideas were still kind of progressive for the time, since race to him was what is subspecies to us today. So he believed that every race was still the same specie, just different populations within that specie. But him being racist in his time isn't exactly surprising.

[@RussellGrantAppling]

How dare meunkamof do such evil

[@toni4729]

Funny how the Bible never told you about any of these things.

[@denvan3143]

The Bible told us there was a beginning to creation; Edwin Hubble’s discovery of the red shift, demonstrates the universe, had a beginning: science catches up with the Bible. The Bible tells us God stretch forth, they heavens, like a garment; astronomical observations confirm that the universe is expanding evermore rapidly every moment: science catches up with the Bible. The Bible tells us the waters. We are gathered into one place in the dry land appeared; geologist have determines there was once one giant continents on the Earth, and one giant ocean: science catches up with the Bible. The Bible tells us God created all living things; the fossil record shows the sudden appearance of lifeforms, with no ancestral forms, which precludes evolution: science catches up with the Bible. The Bible says the mountains were thrust up, and the valleys were cast down; plate, tectonics, demonstrates that strike zones produce, mountain ranges, subduction, zones, produce rift, and valleys: science catches up with the Bible. The Bible says that through sin corruption entered the universe; the second law of thermodynamics states that the energy level in the universe is going from high to a uniform, low level, and that complexity is degenerating into chaos: science catches up with the Bible. The Bible tells us a Jesus Christ, a Paul‘s all things and buy him all things consist; sir Frederick Hoyle, discovered fine-tuning, the fact that the laws of physics must be exactly as they are for life to be possible, and he concluded this was accomplished by a supreme being; we know his name, it is Jesus Christ: science catches up with the Bible. Funny how science had to catch up with what the Bible has told us for 5000 years.

[@toni4729]

The Bible is mans word. God didn't write that book.

[@denvan3143]

The Bible is the word of God, and is filled with truth that science took centuries to catch up with. The Bible states, God created the heavens and the Earth; having Hubble’s discovery of the red shift demonstrated do universe is expanding, therefore, had a beginning: science catches up with the Bible. The Bible states that God stretched out the heavens like a garment; astronomical observations confirm the universe is expanding evermore rapidly every moment: science catches up with the Bible. The Bible states, the waters were gathered into one place, and the dry land appeared; geologist have determined that it one time the Earth had a single giant continent and a single giant ocean: science catches up with the Bible. The Bible says that God created all living things; the fossil record shows the sudden appearance of lifeforms and no ancestral forms, as would be necessary for evolution: science catches up with the Bible. The Bible states, that because of sin corruption entered the universe; the second law of thermodynamics states that the energy level of the universe is going from high to a low, even level, and that complexity is degenerating into chaos: science catches up with the Bible The Bible states that the mountains were thrust up in the valleys, Caslow; plate, tectonics, demonstrates Shrek zones, produce, mountain ranges, subduction, zones, produce, valleys, and Rich: science catches up with the Bible. The Bible states that the Earth hangs suspended in space on nothing; astronomical observations confirm the Earth orbits the sun with no supporting structure, is ancient people site: science catches up with the Bible. The Bible states that by Jesus Christ, all things consist and hold together; sir Frederick Hoyle’s discovery of fine-tuning demonstrates that the laws of physics, or exactly as they are to make life possible, and there’s evidence of the supreme being who said his laws of physics as they are: science catches up with the Bible. Science has found to be true with the Bible, has to say about the world and creation, because the Bible was written by God, not by men.

[@denvan3143]

I chance to see your remark again, and my reply to you; do you have no answer, as there was nothing behind your words. I backed up mine with evidence. Yours were Dagma, mine was the scientific method. And two weeks later, you have no reply.

[@toni4729]

@@denvan3143 If you have a specific question; what is it? I don't see one, just the accusation that I haven't replied.

[@RealHooksy]

An example interesting subject, but of course you are conflating different issues as usual. I look forward to your next discussion about how the Bible has been used to justify slavery for millennia. I won’t hold my breath.

[@denvan3143]

It is evident you are mired in the slavery system of the antebellum, southern United States or perhaps in that of the fascist regimes of Germany of the 1940s or imperialist Japan. Slavery and ancient times was bad, but it was not on the industrial scale of Germany and Japan - or for that matter, present day, China. My Jews took slaves from among The Amalekites, it a man to rescue from a death cult that sacrificed babies and young women. Slavery among the Jews was a kind of debtors prison, people working off unpaid debts with labor means of release: years of the celebration of Jubilee, or by a kinsman Redeemer, a member of their tribe, who would pay off their debt. progress.” “Early Christians liberate slaves at their own expense. In the second and third centuries after Christ, tens of thousands of slaves were freed by people who converted the Christ, and then understood the inherent wrongness of the slave condition. Melania is said to have freed 8,000 slaves, Ovidus 5,000, Chromatius 1400, and Hermes 1200.” Slavery had existed since at least the time of the ancient Mesopotamians, it existed in the Americas among the 200 warring tribes of Native Americans. The United States for a Civil War to free its slaves, as Abraham Lincoln said “ dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” The United States fought a revolutionary war against Great Britain to be free from slavery, America fought a Civil War to free black slaves from slavery, and Americans fought in World War II to prevent the slavery of fascism.

[@toni4729]

Sorry dear but the crabs can't tell you how they did it. So your answer is how did they evolve? They didn't. Very clever.

[@denvan3143]

I have been told repeatedly by people who believe in evolution that “science tells us…” when in point of fact, science doesn’t tell us anything. Science is not an entity that can think or express itself, nor is science a compendium of knowledge. Science is a proces. 160 years of phylogeny does not support evolution; 60 years of genetic research does not support evolution. It is in contradiction to the second law of thermodynamics. Science is what is observable, testable, and verifiable. Evolution is not observed in nature, it is not observed in the fossil record. Evolution is not science. It is a belief system.

[@biker38297]

Darwin was used of the devil.

[@jessebryant9233]

Darwin will be canceled the moment the "scientists" come up with an idea that can replace him.

[@markduell2468]

You really don't understand science. I know you think you do, but you don't.

[@HS-zk5nn]

like alchemy?

[@StudentDad-mc3pu]

Evolution is here to stay.

[@jessebryant9233]

@@StudentDad-mc3pu So the dumb idea they have now is the best the naturalists can do? ...

[@HS-zk5nn]

@@StudentDad-mc3pu lol

[@edwardwicks304]

Atheism, no doubt.

[@denvan3143]

“Science is the culture of doubt.” Richard Feynman. In atheism/evolution no doubt is allowed.

[@toni4729]

Of course your main argument is God all for God. Admit it. That's what this is all about. Turning the whole world again atheism. Or trying to.

[@quijybojanklebits8750]

Too bad evolution is a fact.

[@toni4729]

Yes, how could people have turned blacks into millions of slaves. All these wonderful Christians that whipped the skin off the backs of these poor people. I can't understand it. And now you're blaming Darwin for it who was a GOD FEARING CHRISTIAN. He never left his religion.

[@stephenolan5539]

His wife feared for his immortal soul but still edited his book as best she could. He started looking because he could not believe a benevolent God would purposely create parasitic wasps.

[@toni4729]

@@stephenolan5539 Imagine his surprise then when he first saw a two headed kangaroo.

[@denvan3143]

Evidently you never heard of the American Civil War, in which 600,000 people died, most of them union soldiers, who gave their lives to free the black slaves. Why? As Abraham Lincoln said in his Gettysburg address, including the declaration of independence: “We hold these truths to be self evident that all men are created equal“. That, as Lincoln said, was why we fought that great Civil War. Charles Darwin, in his own words: "I could show fight on natural selection [survival of the fittest, natural selection] having done and doing more for the progress of civilization than you seem inclined to admit.... The more civilized so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world." Life and Letters, I, letter to W. Graham, July 3, 1881, p. 316; cited in Darwin and the Darwinian Revolution, by Gertrude Himmelfarb (London, Chatto and Windus, 1959), p. 343. "The German Fuhrer … has consciously sought to make the practice of Germany conform to the theory of evolution.” Sir Arthur Keith: Evolution and Ethics (New York, G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1949), p. 230. With respect to the question of race struggle, as exemplified especially in Germany, Sir Arthur also observed: "Christianity makes no distinction of race or of colour: it seeks to break down all racial barriers. In this respect, the hand of Christianity is against that of Nature, for are not the races of mankind the evolutionary harvest which Nature has toiled through long ages to produce?" Ibid, p. 72 Germany’s African holocaust preceded the Jewish holocaust. Nazi deaths were between 70 and 85 million people.

[@stephenolan5539]

@@denvan3143 Still cherry picking. And appeal to authority.