How Did Russia Seize a U.S.-Supplied M2 Bradley in Ukraine

The conflict between Ukraine and Russia has seen both sides seizing and repurposing military hardware on multiple occasions. A recent and notable event in this series involves the capture of a U.S.-supplied M2 Bradley Infantry fighting vehicle or IFV by Russian forces in Ukraine. Footage shown on Russian television purportedly portrayed the IFV taken on the front line in Ukraine's Luhansk region, reportedly immobilized by Russian fire and abandoned by its Ukrainian crew.
During the news, the presenter suggested that the seizure of a functional Bradley, one among several dozen supplied by Washington to Ukraine this year, could offer Russian forces insights into its vulnerabilities. This prompts a critical examination of the Bradley's effectiveness in the ongoing conflict and raises questions about the potential insights Russia might gain from this seizure. Consequently, the question arises: should Russia's adversaries, especially the United States, be alarmed by this development?
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv

[@josue_kay]

M1 Abrams has left the chat. 😂

[@DanielBritoist]

This is not fight Talibans!

[@gtpflug2987]

Spin the wheel or buy a vowel, because I don't know what the f u talking about!

[@pirate8847]

it's a fight against Russian orcs who impose their rule on everyone. and their war with the Ukrainians showed that their second army in the world, but at the bottom of the list.😂

[@DanielBritoist]

@@pirate8847 You are wrong! US and NATO are criminals organisations: invade and millions of people in Iraque, Afeganistan, Siria... And stealing their resources. The major terrorists country in the world. Ask Noam Chomsky. Maybe you can learn something and not tell bullshit propaganda!

[@user-mo9og6kg8g]

@@pirate8847 Russian orcs...? This is called Nazism!! You seem to be Ukrainian?

[@user-ej2gd6hr9n]

​@@pirate8847американский солдат обосрался от Талиба в сандалях

[@ph1785]

All tanks , are vulnerable on the battlefield, including the Bradley, from mines, artillery, aircraft, anti tank guns etc, it doesn’t surprise me of # of losses, I read a book on eastern front , most tanks only 1- 3 days on the battlefield, from attrition, mechanical breakdown , and fire power !

[@JustinStLouis-xz7ut]

​@@PORSCHE_COUNTRY.Russians EMP glide drones scramble the digital battlefield and stay aloft for days on end. Not to much advanced tech is being used in Ukraine. Still just conventional weapons because of their integrity. You can build an EMP gun in your garage to better familiarize yourself with how easy the technology is to produce. If you have a fly-by-wire aircraft, Oof! But if it's a hydraulic controlled aircraft using independent pitot static instrumentation, non glass cockpit like the Soviet MiG-31, not much to worry about under an EMP threat.

[@tomcat6735]

EMP home kit? Does that mean I have to sacrifice my kitchen 1500 watt microwave oven?@@JustinStLouis-xz7ut

[@kerbrainbrain9174]

​@@PORSCHE_COUNTRY.u r watching too much terminators 😂

[@ph1785]

@@kerbrainbrain9174 maybe you read some books !!!

[@kerbrainbrain9174]

@@ph1785 and?

[@_Tony.Montana]

Nato Thought Russia is still using the old 80s weapons, and Bradley fighting vehicles are good enough. Then they discovered leopard tanks are not much use as well. They refuse to send in the Abrms tanks in case they get captured.

[@VelikayaRusia]

Абрамс хорош против пастухов в Ираке 😂

[@user-ne2xv3dh2y]

Первый Абрамс уже сгорел 😂

[@hoahoe7554]

Nato ingat yang dia hadapi adalah peternak onta di timur tengah.. mereka lupa bahwa itu rusia😂😂

[@SB-qm5wg]

So, where are those Abrams?

[@greenboyson6897]

Back order

[@blehbleh5095]

In Kyiv just sitting pretty

[@user-xe5pt1or7v]

Не подвезли еще😂

[@psychoaztecs]

i guess US don't trust the Ukrainians yet for the Abrams tanks.

[@user-v10TDI]

Сгорели уже ваши Абрамсы😂

[@user-qy4jd5ss7t]

В принципе, в этом есть положительный момент и это хорошо, что испытывают русское оружие на западной технике.

[@fredfred2363]

As a designer, I have to mention that every military vehicle solution is always a compromise. Light weight and vulnerable or a heavily armoured fortress. Slow and dependable or fast and nimble. Efficient and slow or fast and a gas guzzler. Etc etc...

[@dannyzero692]

The gas turbine on the Abram runs almost as efficiently on higher speed as the diesel while being lighter and quieter at longer distances, but horrible consumption at idling or low speed. Somethings are just not built equal.

[@user-yf8rz8ym8m]

One very important issue has been overlooked here, the issue of the price of weapons. Give me a lot of money and I'll make good weapons, but for a big war you need a lot of inexpensive and maintainable equipment. Bradley is more than 10 tons heavier than the BMP-3. The BMP-3 can float.The Bradley 25 mm cannon, with good sub-caliber projectiles, is more suitable for destroying lightly armored vehicles than for undermining infantry. The 100mm BMP-3 cannon fires powerful high-explosive shells, and a paired 30mm cannon fights well with lightly armored vehicles. The BMP-3 has much better cross-country terrain, on wet Ukrainian chernozems, which are more difficult than wet clay. Unfortunately, due to the collapse of our defense industry after the collapse of the USSR, armor-piercing feathered projectiles, like those of the 25mm Bradley cannon, were not developed (or rather implemented) for the 30mm cannon. Obviously, this is an unused reserve of our 30mm guns. In general, there should be a lot of technology in a real war, and learning how to use it should be easy! I hope that Ukraine's stocks of equipment will run out soon, and Russian factories will produce it in large quantities. At least the output of military equipment is increasing in Russia every month and there are still reserves.

[@user-os1kt2wb6k]

Отличный комментарий! Всё по делу сказано!

[@user-yf8rz8ym8m]

@@user-os1kt2wb6k Спасибо товарищ)

[@249170mac1]

Все верно!

[@TheAns51]

One thing you forgot is that expensive stuff tend to be more safe for the crew. I know russia doesn't care of their soldiers, it's has been noted since ww1 and mastered in ww2 so they make them fast, cheat and weak. Yes russia produces a shitload of cheap stuff that kills their crews most of the time too. I would take quality over quantity everyday. But you are correct in that russian vehicles are better suited to fight in this kind of territory where land is wet and muddy as they don't sink in nearly as much. NATO vehicles are developed to use mostly for terrain found in central europe and USA and this shows as main battle tanks are not that good in open, muddy fields in Ukraine as they would be in forestry terrain of Europe,which hardens the use of drones. Armored vehicles overall in this senseless invasion has proved to have lived their best times as aerial attacks from drones and missiles eat them day by day from both sides.

[@jokerlom]

It looks like there is no advanced technology in Bradley to begin with. So, there are no risks for the american army.

[@sinisadabic5371]

It is still steel coffin, no amout of tech can save it

[@gazh4984]

You misunderstood most tech been taken out just a bit of broken steel

[@karimlerbheley8553]

Et aucun risque pour l'armée russe non plus mdrr

[@fx4g172]

What are you talking about? Its 80's/90's technology will be a massive upgrade for the Russian military. It's now their most advanced battle tank, far beyond the Armata tank. The Bradley will spearhead their next offensive.

[@pooferfish2850]

@@fx4g172 😂

[@alexcronin41]

I believe it is not the fist Bradley got captured

[@IgorSinitsky]

you also believe in aliens I see

[@kimness7796]

The video said this was the first "upgraded" Bradley captured. @@IgorSinitsky

[@robinhoodhimself]

@@IgorSinitsky Yes we've met them. They are working with us.

[@ragincajun2446]

@@kimness7796 thats the thing even b4 they didn't, they captured a CV90, this is there first Bradley, but it doesn't matter tbh equipment is replaceable, human lives r not.

[@banta-pd8zj]

Any losses of supplied IVF's and current model tanks aren't a Russian state secret are they? Otherwise you lose armoured vehicles by shooting at them. Is that right?

[@sadus5415]

re upload, but no information as to why, great channel as always

[@anoni81b4u]

Oh no ... they might see all the insight into an early 80s design

[@purple_dinosaur]

This channel is so dramatic. Lol

[@ioDeveloper]

Leopard was upgraded to 2A6 in 2005. This is definitely not an 80s design.

[@webkeeper]

Things have changed. From "Russians will run at the sight..." to "Pfff it is an old junk". All this, while Abrams with all their advertising is nowhere to be seen and the German tanks with equal advertising have joined Bradleys on the fields that Russians have named "Bradley Alley".

[@dannyzero692]

@@ioDeveloper the hull was from the late 70s/early 80s, under all that extra armor is still a design from the late 70s. Which is still better than what most design philosophy Russia uses which is from the T-64/72 with their notoriously combustible autoloaders.

[@samsudinudin1563]

This mean that US Bradley's are of no match for Russian Weapons for being successfully disabled by Russian Ammo.

[@user-uv1ql2fc1m]

Их даже грязь и мороз выводят из строя !

[@Adam-ss9do]

It's a M2A2 ODS SA, not the latest version. Basically 1990's tech.

[@marianpopelas]

A čo si myslíte že Američania pošlú to najnovšie.Budte radi že vám poslali aspoň to. Keby to bolo na mne nedostali by ani náboj.

[@ZenTeT]

serious? Tank T90 was taken out by 2 bradleys! get out of here its to late for anything.

[@tomcat6735]

Without the ATGMs.

[@dcimedic]

Well the crew of that T90 didn’t gain anything that’s for sure 😂

[@tingleblade4274]

the crew survived

[@corychallice7705]

​@@tingleblade4274and was disabled by an IFV 🤣

[@africa...foodandlifestyle5511]

​@@corychallice7705even an American tank can be dissambled. Nothing superior about it.a lot were burnt in Iraq but your media is so strong to still push for it's superiority.whata desperate way of pushing your propaganda 😀😀😂

[@Nero-Caesar]

​@corychallice7705 the Bradley didn't disable the T-90M in the video you can see it driving under it's own power then it runs into a tree then a fpv drone knocks it out then the crew flees

[@marco-ro6cl]

ok buddy@@Nero-Caesar

[@g1998k]

Being trained on a BMP-3 I can only say that its a hell of an armored vehicle.

[@user-nx1xz6fy9l]

🇷🇺🇷🇺

[@TxChristopher]

Ford thought the Pinto was great too when they designed, built, and sold it.

[@ViTeK9]

Мы и хорошие машины отправляем в ад😈

[@Ghosy01]

Too bad it’s weak rear armour . It wasn’t designed for a war with drones constantly flying around you with shaped charges . Hopefully Russia upgrade them .

[@g1998k]

@Ghosy01 I agree, but its competitor, the Bradley has similar issues with a minor rear armor advantage . The automatic loader of the BMP3, the large canon caliber, burst fire and missile launch capabilities i believe give it an advantage over the Bradley and can even pose serious threat to the M1. L

[@robertsedlar5733]

Finally, those Russian fools saw what a proper vehicle looks like

[@user-uo1tr5kh6x]

Interesting that my historical observation of the redundant tank warfare tactic disappeared on this site!

[@PickledShark]

Man seeing all those destroyed tanks and Bradley’s in one frame is depressing

[@MoonlightVKV]

Why?

[@ViTeK9]

Напротив, очень даже радует 😁

[@webkeeper]

Shouldn't it be more depressing that these machines were used to invade other countries, using trumped-up evidence, and destroy the lives of millions?

[@user-yf8rz8ym8m]

I should note that these shots greatly inspired our soldiers and citizens after Ukraine launched its widely publicized counteroffensive and the first attack ended in such an embarrassment... Ukrainians boasted that they were trained according to NATO standards, but NATO's "standards" envisage absolute air supremacy!!! And Russia has absolute air supremacy, so NATO tactics in this case are not only useless, but also deadly! Everyone understands this except modern Western politicians. However....

[@BP7624]

@@ViTeK9приятно радует глаз 🤣

[@Makbo.]

В любом в кофликте, трофейная техника идёт на изучение и разбор, дабы знать как её уничтожать.

[@Peter-xg5fq]

This is why Russia is winning. Analyze the missile, Tank or any vehicle to intercept.

[@Titanis-qe1yb]

У Ребекки Клод из Pearl TV тоже очень красивые ноги.

[@kennethforsythe8182]

@@Peter-xg5fq They are not winning. Russia is playing the old Stalingrad games.. sending young men into the grinder for a few meters. Nobody is winning.

[@hohol777]

​@@Peter-xg5fq😂😂 лол

[@forevernomad1766]

It’s an IFV noy rocket science boys you don’t need to study it just use your common sense tops sides and backs of any tank are the vulnerable spots if you can hit the engine with a drone or rpg or artillery or tracks and immobilize it it will be a sitting duck not matter what it is then you finish it off with artillery direct hit on the catapula of any tank will knock it out with the crew if they would just use common sense they wouldn’t have to study anything lol

[@Crendermin]

Weird how an IFV doesn't have armor to face against MBTs... almost like it's a support and recon vehicle with crew safety as the top priority

[@sinisadabic5371]

Man hahahaha, IFV cant stand any MBT

[@knowahnosenothing4862]

@@sinisadabic5371 That's the point of his comment.

[@marco-ro6cl]

weird how it isnt, and an IFV is a troop transport with TOW roof crushers to annhialate t90s

[@user-pw5jr1qq4k]

ЕСЛИ-БЫ У БАБУШКИ БЫЛ-БЫ ХУЙ, ОНА БЫЛА-БЫ ДЕДУШКОЙ...(В ДАННОМ СЛУЧАЕ ТАНКОМ)..

[@williamt.sherman2573]

@@marco-ro6cl dude ODed on stupid juice

[@dl-ce3so]

Many BMP3s have been captured as well. Capturing equipment on both sides should be a given. It all comes down which side has the better expertise and resources to quickly exploit the finds.

[@kirill36732]

Только почему то украинцы их не показывают на видео, что говорит о их лжи, нет у них ничего! ВСУ отступает по всем фронтам и поле боя всегда за Россией, и как украинцы захватывают бмп-3 если поле боя всегда за Россией, мозги включи клоун!

[@Polkovalski]

Ты их видел, эксперт диванный

[@kirill36732]

@@Polkovalski У них девиз, ври больше вдруг поверят..

[@dannyzero692]

I could only shutter at the thought of Russia acquiring 30 years old vehicles instead of 40.

[@mattieyo]

I like how Russian is saying bmp is better. How ever you never see someone walk away from a destroyed bmp.

[@user-qw1bi1mk8s]

Поверь,БМП лучше,знаю что говорю,у нас парни и по три раза были подбиты и все живые😅

[@michaeld1170]

No doubt Russia will study it to improve their own vehicles

[@NoName-md5zb]

Well they knew what to do - make their own vehicles better. They still didnt. This wont change anything.

[@PCZ21]

@@NoName-md5zbthey dont Need the US scrap

[@ssaini5028]

@@NoName-md5zb Russia already better weapons

[@zeusandathena4094]

😂😂😂 yeah right.. Thats laughable ​@@ssaini5028

[@-Ya-Russkiy-]

​@@NoName-md5zbRussia has the best weapons , it proved this in the war , and American technology fought only against shepherds and Indians

[@whiskey_tango_foxtrot__]

They bought it...intact. Slightly used.

[@bubamaranovichok4901]

Yeah with luxurious interior, including hot and cold feet under one thousand miles driven by my Granny.

[@MoonlightVKV]

It's perforated everywhere, wtf are you smoking...

[@corychallice7705]

ALL Russian armour is just an eventual casket

[@terrycarter1137]

It would stand to reason that if a potential enemy gets their hands on your equipment they could figure it out. Maybe incorporate a erase button to completely erase all computer programming and "brick" the electronics.

[@anthonysaponaro6318]

they're wasting their time if theyre lookin for secrets . . . .

[@Ghosy01]

The only thing they can really get of value is its optics . I Can certainly see it being shipped to a Chinese lab .

[@terrycarter1137]

@@Ghosy01 they can investigate the engine, and 25mm gun and see where they can make improvements.

[@ansokol]

you Anglo-Saxons didn't know it would be like this?

[@temmy9]

Buddy, it ain't th Anglo-Saxons running this war

[@sinisadabic5371]

Zionist mate in every western country, anglo saxons are also opressed

[@victorong9772]

Russians are more interested in heavier tanks like leopards or American tanks !

[@user-hc8es6cu4t]

Бредли нечего не решит и не поможет ...😢от выстрела из птура или танка толку от него небудет и мины его сожгут на раз...😊

[@zatoichiable]

The Ukrainian crew must have abandon the bradley without fighting...

[@gandalfgreyhame3425]

Right, like after they hit a mine and they were unable to move any further. We know this happened to a number of Bradleys during the initial Ukrainian counterattacks through the Russian minefields, a tactic which did not work too well.

[@LloydTaray-bt7ho]

The Bradley penetrated by a t80 while the 2 Bradley didn't penetrated a t90 lol

[@luisbrayllebelo4973]

Rusia waiting Abraham tank in avdivkha, but havent deploy yet to the area

[@Happy.Viewer]

Bmp-3 can not be survived against 30 mm Bullets and RPG-7 like the Bradley!

[@paulstrollo3187]

they finally have a replacement for the t-90 main battle tanks... LMFAO

[@VVV85650]

2022: Western tanks are a game changer. They are designed to resist Soviet weapons. 2023: Anyone else remember what an unexploded Leopard and Bradley look like? 2025: Two tickets to Bradley square please.

[@TheDude50447]

Never heard anyone say that they are resistant to soviet weapons. It was always about improved capability and crew survival. A single soldier with an rpg can knock out the best tanks in the world under the right circumstances and a 203mm artillery shell leaves nothing but a crater.

[@VVV85650]

@@TheDude50447 Before the counter offencive I was told this by one guy on the history legends channel, he believed that Western tanks could not be destroyed just because they were made in the WEST. I don’t know what propaganda they fed him, but I quoted him here verbatim.

[@jamessouza7065]

Hey what do you feel is happening seeing my belly button move closer to then further away..closer/further over and over many times

[@TheDude50447]

@@VVV85650 Yeah some idiot is gonna believe something like that. And youll find idiots making videos like that since anyone can do it. But reputable sources wont

[@stephenang499]

Send to China to copy

[@davidhauk4163]

I believe the Bradley was developed during a period where the US was involved in counter insurgency. Designed to over power low funded insurgencies. Hence not really designed to go up against a formidable well funded adversary. Thanks.

[@ivan200804]

It was designed as US answer to BMP-1. Unlike M113, which is essentially just a troop carrier, M2 Bradley has 25mm auto cannon and AT TOW missiles.

[@Chris-yg6lo]

Don't let these clowns fool you, that piece of crap just took out their best tank without using anti tank missile

[@davidhauk4163]

Okay, Thanks. @@ivan200804

[@pooferfish2850]

They did pretty well against T-72 in iraq and they have decent armor + ease of maintenance I don’t see how they don’t do well against a well funded adversary wouldnt that mean the same thing for other infantry fight vechiles none of them have something that makes them special from eachother

[@cipher88101]

They are using the Bradley to very good effect in Ukraine, there are going to be losses, it's combat. It was designed for what it's being used for, not for insurgencies. That's the MRAPs.

[@DM1072]

Would've thought they would have fitted a electronic kill switch that would fry the sensatve electronics or remotely destroy the tank after it's been taking?

[@Salazar_]

Well after 2 bradley destroys the most powerful russian tank in the battlefield, the T-90M

[@ryanj610]

We ignore that and only speak of doom and gloom, here. Nearly all Bradleys taken out have been hit by mines..... that's not a weakness, IMO.

[@aled845]

The T-90 was alone in Stepove, without infantry or drones covering/guiding it, contrary to the 3 Bradleys being guided by a drone. The T-90 got hit by a drone first, and the stunned crew then got ambushed. Mind you the T-90 couldn't return effectively fire due to the constant strafing stunning the crew and the optics/turret ring being broken. The Bradleys just damaged the T-90 which then voluntarily crashes into a tree to jam its spinning broken turret to let the crew out. The T-90 is thus a highly survivable tank, and in a different setting would have most likely taken the W as all odds were stacked against it in this fight. It then got brown up by a drone

[@canemcave]

@@aled845 exactly, 2 Bradley on their own without TOW weaponry, can wipe out a tank just by firing their gun, that's not bad at all I would think

[@MetalPanic]

They didnt couse ran out of ammo.Just the reactive plate blows up.

[@canemcave]

@@MetalPanic sure, the Bradley only used the 25mm gun, it didn't have any TOW to use or the tank would have been toast with one single shot

[@remlapwc]

Have to question Ukrainians tactics to have so many Bradleys hit within yards of each other.

[@tomcat6735]

Yes, it look like a refueling or resupply point where the artillery strike happened. Many times the enemies know when you are going to the rear to take care of logistics and maintenance.

[@h0plite996]

Maybe it was an old school ex Soviet in charge

[@paulwilson915]

i wouldnt be surprise if china and north korea will soon to have theire own bradley replica...just like US drone it will be feature in theire parade...

[@h0plite996]

@@paulwilson915 Like tanks, it is how you use it.

[@d-4073]

Stuck in a minefield where you can't go anywhere

[@frednel4326]

As a ex South African defense force Ratel gunner myself the bradly is only a lightly armourd vehicle much like the Ratel and is not invincible, its desighned to quickly transport troops into battle and support them and get them out again and there will be casualties, its called war you know !!!, theres not one single military vehicle i now of that cant be destroyed ever, some just take more punnishment than others deppending on whats used against it, so anything can get a single hit to get destroyed even if its the toughest tank in the world by using more powerfull or the right weapons, what makes a bradly or a ratel so good is its speed ability making for a difficult target as long as it keeps moving and certainly a better option than having troops deployed to battle on foot or with trucks, many soldiers lives have been spared because of these troop carriers so imo they get the job done right ??? ✌

[@borali26]

They will study how a Bradley could destroy T90 modern russian tank.

[@user-xf4nd9tj4z]

так и будет. хотите драться.

[@xCR4NKEDx]

And listen.. The Bradley IS ONLY A BATTLE BUS! ITS JUST AN ARMOURED SCHOOL BUS TO FERRY TROOPS! And yet it took OUT A RUSSIAN T90!!! Stop talking smack about it.. It saves LIFES!

[@Evgeniy199]

На войне и Абрамсы горят от картонки, но это все таки исключение. Нужно помнить, что железо, это железо, а погибших ( ради чего?) украинцев уже ничто не вернёт...

[@duilawyr]

lives

[@xCR4NKEDx]

Yeah and middel finger to u cus i didnt care to redo it so what mr perfect? Did you take that name or did your mom spell it wrong too? 😂

[@comments.cuestionsandconcerns]

war......war never changes.

[@legion6277]

Was that one of the Bradley's that shredded those T-90's

[@shouleewang4131]

Russian just wants to put the Bradly as its war trophy and displays it for the people to look at.

[@ragincajun2446]

ngl patriot par was very very scare, ruSSia has said to capture Challengers and Leopards yet none r there

[@tekpic04]

​@@ragincajun2446I have seen two videos of those in the military museum in Moscow and it's on display.

[@user-sk5in4ps1p]

Ты хорошо учил историю. Кто к нам с мечом приходит, тот меч потом мы показываем в наших музеях вашим (european) детям

[@ragincajun2446]

@@tekpic04 where

[@denkravtsov6009]

It’s funny that this technology is more than 20 years old, how backward Russia is, that for it it’s a meme of unknown technologies.

[@brianrasmussen2956]

The real question should be, how did the 2nd army of the world ONLY seize ONE Bradley!!

[@user-ge2vw9pl5g]

Остальные просто сгорели 😂😂😂

[@w.loczykij5354]

Because they destroyed the rest.

[@user-ge2vw9pl5g]

Они самоубились об российские снаряды )))​@@w.loczykij5354

[@brianrasmussen2956]

@@user-ge2vw9pl5gSo hows taking Kiev in three days going recently 😂

[@TxChristopher]

You meant 2nd best army in Ukraine 😂

[@olov87]

The combination of deep mud, mines, and hidden long range Anti-tank weapons. and its a verry bad day for Armored units.

[@user-nw4jh6yc2x]

Что такой грустный ? Поплачь еще , диктор

[@NAFO_MythicPlague]

Funny part is the optics were destroyed and the computers wrecked.

[@Dirty_Dumb_NAFO_Scum]

BMP-T's are superior.

[@tomcat6735]

When you abandon a tank or IFV thats what you do (SOP), but sometimes since Russians and Ukraines are the same blood the prize can be used to negotiate a deal like the treatment of POWs.

[@wolfgangemmerich7552]

Russian authorothys didn´t allow the international red cross to take contakt with ukrainians in russian captivity ; nobody know how the RF treats the UAF folks .@@tomcat6735

[@mastercooper743]

How do you know that? do you have source of information, if yes please provide it!

[@redemsion2020]

Технике НАТО одно применение.... Гореть!

[@Rambo7445]

Russie grande merdé 💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩

[@oksiyarull1701]

👍👍👍

[@drakekoefoed1642]

general bradley would be disgusted with these things

[@devil40548]

Be careful of tracking device inside

[@reginaldlagrone5082]

The Bradley, is a modified M113, that all it is. Look at a Bradley and M113 side-by-side. This is a lazy man's way of making an IFV. That's why the Bradley can not sustain direct hits. Be honest it's a fraud

[@layneparker7408]

The survivability of the Bradley is significantly higher then any bmp. At least when a Bradley hits a mine the entire crew and infantry squad don't instantly die unlike the bmp lol. Russians started riding on top of BMP to increase survivability 😂😂

[@d-4073]

The bradley has incredible survivability I don't know what you're on about

[@samanths8898]

What abt the ukrain captured vehicles, they have moved to US to do the same.

[@zeusandathena4094]

Including the helicopter that the Russian pilot defected. I'm sure it is going to be studied

[@alexcronin41]

@@zeusandathena4094That was Cold War piece which was studied a decade ago

[@Chris-yg6lo]

Both sides realize Intel is always to be found.

[@f-35lightningii6]

Was Ukraine captured T-90 in kharkiv transfer to American spot in New Orleans..

[@denkravtsov6009]

Ukraine transferred the newest Russian T-90 tank to the United States at the beginning of the Russian invasion. And we did not make of these sensations the way the Russians do. The Ukrainians captured 450 Russian tanks, including the latest designs.

[@Dweller415]

They wanted to get a look at an Infantry fighting vehicle.

[@Benz2533]

when large number of equipment went into battlefield, some of them get damage and some of them survive the damage. sometime those abandon vehicle is still functioning but it was abandon. It happen in wars.

[@kaamelott0847]

If the Ulrainian use it to move infantry on the front line, high rate of destruction seem normal. It would be unlikely to see Russian avoid attempt to destruction any Bradley.

[@iceman6705]

America has no hope in general regarding military equipment productions its capabilities. It is too expensive and short falls. Basically a gigantic $840 billions Vs $70 billions of Russia per year defense budgets Vs Chinese's $ 128 billions. Too much undercuts no accountabilities, no hope.

[@kimness7796]

I'll bet we knew some would be lost to mines, attacks, running out of gas. That sort of shit.

[@MarkosValerii]

Hello beautiful it's nice meeting you here how are you doing today hope you're having a blissful day so far today?

[@68rus41]

Украина громко плачет,Потеряла всех кто скачет,Гривну,землю,лес и газ,Севастополь,Крым,Донбасс,Совесть,честь,друзей,активы,Урожай и перспективы,Еврозону,членство в НАТО.Скоро трибунал ребята!!!😊😃😂

[@evo2girl]

Well, considering the fact that US advanced technologies are not so advanced against Russia, chances are they will NOT be replicated by Russia. Tested, yes.

[@mistersmacky]

Likely Russia won't have to components to try to replicate them, unless washing machine controller chips can be converted to do the job.

[@extraterrestrialfascisti7625]

The Bradley, like the M1, the Leopard, the Challenger are combined arms weapons. They are designed for use with air and artillery support with a well trained crews. In Ukraine they have no air support; indifferent artillery support and poorly trained crews. Bradley is a great weapon but very vulnerable without support. In Desert Storm (my war) the Bradley performed very well but it had tons of support.

[@gilbhedy1]

They save lives...and they took down T90...Nuff said.

[@kurtkesters6043]

During the battle of the bulge, a M8 greyhound attacked a Tiger1 and won the engagement. The move was as stupid as the outcome was lucky...

[@valkry007]

Ukrainian army reminds me of Italian army of WWII, and the Bradley is just a toaster with a gun on top. Leopards, Challengers, Bradleys - all game changers, until they go up against a modern army.

[@Chris-yg6lo]

Some how an IFV took out the best Russian tank. Russia should be embarrassed that such a piece of crap bested its best tank.

[@otmardomainko8801]

The are gamechangers for true! They had changed the war to russians favour. 😁😆

[@whitefalcon630]

@@Chris-yg6lo Lancet and other FPV took out more than one Leopard tanks How about that?

[@thatrandomguy8124]

"modern army" yeah ok you clearly huff russian copium properganda.

[@luigipasta9496]

​@@Chris-yg6lohollywood propaganda..... awesome!!

[@paulighalo5541]

Exactly what your question suggested is what it is.

[@tomak79]

My father was an RAF fighter pilot, (WWII) he did his OTU, operational training unit on Hurricanes, then flew bomber escort for a period, flying the American Tomahawk, a tachometer, a compass, a fuel gauge, no radio, and very large fuel tanks. He told me that on his last bomber escort operation on Tomahawks out of twelve pilots/aircraft, only two returned, himself and another pilot. They both were moved to the 165 squadrons, flying Supermarine Spitfires with an RR Merlin powerplant, where he remained until the end of the war, accumulating just under 1,000 hours of flight operations from the south coasts of England, too and including over France, Belgium, Netherlands, Germany, Denmark, Poland, Luxemburg, and Norway. Just like the US Bradleys the attrition rate of pilots and their aircraft, was so high that they were not able to replace the aircraft and new pilots fast enough, just like in Ukraine today! 22 01 2024 UK Glory to Ukraine, Godspeed!

[@ruslanpesterev1207]

😂Твой отец добивал уже полумертвых нацыстов, которых вовсю уничтожала красная армия а вы островитяне приткнулись в конце войны, позорища🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@denkravtsov6009]

@@AlexAndr-pb3uu Russian Ivan, this slogan was used by the OUN and UPA, who also fought against the Nazis. You can read about this in the documents of the Nuremberg Tribunal, and there is not a word there that they were Nazi collaborators. They fought for a free and independent Ukraine.

[@denkravtsov6009]

@@AlexAndr-pb3uu Neither Stepan Bandera, nor Roman Shukhevych personally, nor the OUN or UPA as organizations were convicted by the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg. The materials of the Nuremberg Tribunal provide an exhaustive list of individuals and organizations recognized as criminal.

[@denkravtsov6009]

@@AlexAndr-pb3uu Document 014-USSR - secret circular on Einsatzgruppe S-5, dated November 25, 1941. It stated as a reliably established fact that the “Bandera movement” (OUN(b)) was preparing an anti-German uprising in the occupied territories with the aim of creating an independent Ukrainian state. In this regard, the Einsatzgruppen was ordered to shoot all identified Banderaites after a thorough interrogation. And all interrogation protocols should be immediately sent to superiors.

[@denkravtsov6009]

@@AlexAndr-pb3uu Spring-autumn 1943 was the period of the most intense battles between the UPA and the Germans on Wolin (the main period of the “anti-German front”). The UPA secured settlements on the territory of Western Ukraine, creating a powerful administration (for example, the “Kolka Republic”), trying to protect the sovereign independence of the Germans, conducting defensive battles (anti-partisan actions of Eri) and von dem Bach-Zalewski and Hans Prützmann).

[@zeusandathena4094]

Good video and information. Im sure most of us have seen the Bradley go head to head with the T90 and the resulting damage to the tank afterwards😊

[@user-ib4wh2yq8d]

Ошибка выжившего. Почему не берёшь в пример остальные случаи когда танк спокойно взрывал Бредли. А точно неудобно пропаганда сыпется.

[@mobilelegend1458]

Ahahhaahhahaha pretend you are a tank operator and guess carefully if other vehicles come in front of u and shot what is wrong with your tank or you are a crazy ?

[@user-sf1ow5ui1k]

единственный случай. есть чем гордиться?

[@case8987]

A greyhound also took out a tiger tank in ww2. Doesn’t mean you’d wanna be fighting tanks in a greyhound lol

[@luka2298]

And did absolutely nothing lol

[@danobrien3601]

well its an upgraded but old vehicle so no surprises ..impressive cannon against light infantry but from what I can see its lucky to take out a heavy tank ..

[@986najes8]

The Bradley seems to be a lightly armoured vehicle no better than WW2 tanks

[@MrZlocktar]

There is no doubt that BMP-3 is better. You don't even need inside knowledge to understand this. The firepower isn't even comparable to say the least. Just as it's mobility and ease of use. But most importantly profile of vehicle. When BMP-3 is only 2 meter height, Bradley is a god damn three-meter barn. Bradley was just a better vehicle for Ukraine which was using mostly BMP-1 and BMP-2 at best. Hell, even Marder seemed like a good deal. Or even CV-90 which were also captured by Russia. Bradley is just good enough to be a better version of BMP-2. Although, the upgraded version of BMP-2 can be just as good.

[@Dirty_Dumb_NAFO_Scum]

The terminator is unequivocally better.

[@ajc5479]

That's ok buddy, you just keep being DUMB with your beliefs lol

[@ragincajun2446]

not really between the 2 one was designed for easy to use and can make a lot the other was made for crew survivability and quality, between the 2 BMP is a death trap we see soldiers riding on the top while the Bradleys can be inside which that alone shows us they have more trust in Bradleys than BMPs for crew survivability which is highly wanted due to the fact u can replace equipment not crew.

[@ImBigFloppa]

And in turn for being so short and light, it has paper thin armor that results in 50 BMG being capable of penetrating the sides and rear from a good distance away, and more importantly, artillery fragments from shells that land just 10 meters from the vehicle being able to penetrate the hull. That in and of itself more than quadruples the area of destruction for an artillery shell when compared to a Bradley that would require a direct hit. You also have zero survivability as having 48 small artillery shells and 500 autocannons in a vehicle with paper thin armor is just a recipe for disaster. You also don't have a thermal imager for the commander at all, and the thermal imager for the gunner is extremely lackluster. It doesn't matter how fast you can go on asphalt roads and how much firepower you have when in fields where most vehicles would be lucky to reach 40kph, and when that firepower cannot be effectively aimed at a target, and when their pathetic armor makes them susceptible to a strong gust of wind.

[@eliseomoreno5894]

La óptica fue destuida por un dron lo que no dejo operar el tanque a linertad....el t 90 intacto prácticamente....los dos Bradley no le hicieron prácticamente nada 😂

[@eddypan8]

The optics were destroyed by the Bradley otherwise the t90 would have toasted to 2 Bradleys. Can't shoot what you can't see.

[@eliseomoreno5894]

@@eddypan8 la óptica fue destruída primero por un dron...después los 2 Bradley atacaron posteriormente otro dron fue lanzado pero falló....el t 90 recuperado sin más daño que en la óptica

[@user-pb1mc4ex5x]

0:01 без Советской МТ-ЛБ (Мотолыга) никуда ))) Теперь только в России их производят ... Раньше в Харькове ещё производили

[@psychoaztecs]

in before those bradleys were decoys that has trackers in them.

[@FlashBack-nk4ju]

I have the short where the soldiers were captured just a few hours after the clip.

[@NAFO_MythicPlague]

I can see the russian skilled Mechanics doing the work. Literally a barrel of monkeys since all their skilled labor is at the front. I have to ask this. If you send the only dependable skilled people to the front. Then replace them with drunks and lazy people who are not dependable. What do you expect your production to be like? What benefit are they to you and how do you expect to accomplish anything?

[@Dirty_Dumb_NAFO_Scum]

That's CIA cope, there's a picture of an entire field of them but they're not merely take out by mines, they're entirely blasted apart and burned, and the proximity of the IFVs are way too close, maybe a few of them but the rest of them were definitely hit with ATGM fire and cooked. Don't buy the lies of that fat CIA paid queer McBeth. Also the BMP-T is superior regardless.

[@NathanDean79]

The Bradley is extremely capable. Just ask a Ukrainian soldier who has used one. Just ask an American soldier who has used one. Well hey that’s me!! I am former US Army Mechanized Infantry. And I would certainly rather be in a Bradley than any BMP. The Bradley can take a direct hit from a T-72 tank. It will probably knock it out of Commision but most importantly the people inside will walk away from it. And be back to fight another day. The Bradley is very survivable it’s TOW missiles can destroy any tank on Earth and it’s 25 mm cannon is no slouch either. It can turn a BMP into Swiss cheese.

[@evigrace8149]

then why can’t Ukraine win if they have such powerful weapons?)

[@avegromek]

@@evigrace8149 Ukraine is a poor 40 mln, former soviet republic country that facing former superpower right at its borders. the fact that they made it this far into almost a 2nd year without loosing a country amazes me. kudos to them

[@SRB.4S]

There is no doubt that Bradley is capable IFV. But against whom?! Taliban carrier with AK-47, in slippers?! Or some similar wars, in the invasions that the US and NATO carried out on various countries, against small and weak countries and armies with poor and outdated military training and military equipment. Against such countries, Bradley can be effective. In Ukraine, we saw that it is not quite so capable, when for the first time Western military equipment is at war against a serious military power, such as Russia. A direct hit from the T-72, Bradley certainly cannot withstand if it is APFSDS, even when it is the oldest variant of the old Soviet missiles, the kind used by Iraq at one time, and the penetration is about 350 mm of homogeneous steel.Bradley has better armor protection than the BMP-2, but it is much worse than the BMP3, and it is at least 3 times more expensive than the Russian IFV?! The problem with Bradley, like most western military equipment, is poor mobility, lack of agility, poorly solved track suspension not adequate for the terrain in Ukraine, as well as the weight of the vehicles themselves, especially when tanks are out of the question, as soon as the season of mud, later snow and ice begins in Ukraine, western tanks and IFVs can be thrown into the garbage by Ukrainians. Because they cannot, or can be used in limited numbers, in such conditions precisely because of the above-mentioned facts... Also on top of all that, poorly resolved complicated and expensive maintenance , for this type of conflict, overcrowding with,electronics and opto-electronics, which also proved to be very bad when it comes to durability and maintenance...Equipment that often breaks down and requires constant maintenance ... This applies to everything, Western self-propelled howitzers, tanks, IFV ... It really seems to me that this channel has been covered in detail with that topic... That's why the old Soviet or newer Russian towed, and self-propelled howitzers, and tanks than Western, so-called "game changer" tanks, and howitzers... Western military equipment is effective against the Taliban, various rebels... But not exactly in the first real war for them, and against military power such as Russia. Also to make matters worse, Western military equipment is more expensive, not twice but from 5 to 10 times for purchase and maintenance, and in Ukraine, the biggest conflict after World War II, it mostly proved to be bad. To make matters worse, this is the first real war for the US and NATO and their modern military equipment... Which leads to the fact that the military industrial complex of the US and NATO governs the US state first and foremost, and robs its citizens and the army, selling them military equipment that is the same or worse than Russian or, say, Chinese at a price 5 to 10 times higher than what the equipment is really worth?! While promoting in the media, which he also owns, the military industrial complex, as incredible "game changers, which are 100 times better than Russian or Chinese military equipment"?! Well, if someone believed in it until the war in Ukraine, they certainly don't believe in it anymore! Unlike the US, the Russians and Chinese get their military equipment at the most favorable possible prices for their army. Because neither in Russia nor in China, in the political sense, let alone in the media, does the military-industrial complex ask absolutely nothing, let alone set or change the presidents of the state or politicians in the country, as is the case in the US hegemony. But he can only sit in the corner and listen to what the political and military leaders order and do according to their orders.

[@GoranStanic-nt8gp]

Bravo!!!!

[@dutchdna]

I like Swiss cheese.

[@user-bz7fl7if9c]

Горят милые. Горят.

[@DaveFrags]

You don’t give or sell away tech you consider to precious for you’re enemies to seize :)

[@0neKingD0wn]

Well shit , guess bradleys fighting something else then flipflop sheperd with aks and rpg is destroyable after all huh? Who would have guessed.

[@ragincajun2446]

Should note 2 Bradley crews made a ruSSian T-90M crew pussy foot out of there, they penetrated the tank due to the fact its spun uncontrollably, and then made the T-90M crash into a tree....

[@LloydTaray-bt7ho]

I've seen a footage the Bradley failed and embarrassed for a moment he can't penetrated or destroyed a tank but the drone did it😂​@@ragincajun2446

[@Kenny-bj2zq]

I have a bad feeling that there is going to be a video "How did Terrorist get there hands on U.S made Stinger Missile sold to Ukraine"...

[@Dirty_Dumb_NAFO_Scum]

Those weapons are already being found in africa.

[@ajc5479]

I'm sure you have a lot of stupid feelings

[@pvtj0cker]

Using violent means would be my guess.

[@eliseomoreno5894]

Los Bradley han ardido por todo el campo de batalla...podrías sacar un vídeo de eso ???

[@Kawa2021]

Il n’y a pas de vidéo car c’est de la propagande

[@user-wj5hi5bj5u]

Victoire victoire pour vous les gars 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺✊en vous souhaitant fort depuis le Gabon 🇬🇦💪

[@jameslawrentz1152]

They have only had the M2s for around a year now. We've had them longer. Experience and training does alot on showing capabilities. It's like driving a car. A new driver, or newer driver doesn't have the experience of a person that's been driving for 20 hrs or so on. There's a lot you have to look at to determine if something is not working properly or effectively before you make a judgment call.

[@denkravtsov6009]

This looks like propaganda and custom material. They didn’t even ask for the assessment of the Ukrainian Bradley tankers, who praise it more in comparison with Soviet/Russian equipment.

[@slick_96]

Catured the Bradley but what about the crew?

[@katyushatman5187]

bradley is an old vehicle so in theory the capture by russia should not concern usa and nato, BUT since they still heavily use it, and the vehicle is currenty in combat against russia the capture of any vehicle should be concerning, because the opposing force can study the vehicle in and out throughfuly and find the best way to destroy them, lowering the effectiveness even more and it may or may not be true that bmp-3 outclass bradley in almost every aspect even russia should admot bradley is better protected than bmp-3, but its not amphibious like the russian IFV what is limited to a certain weight to keep its buoyancy

[@Dirty_Dumb_NAFO_Scum]

It was a bounty placed to humiliate the United States, the bounty was a year old already, there have been videos of plenty of Bradleys being completely smoked by Russian weapons.

[@abdouj7116]

Excuses 😅😅😅

[@andread5560]

The USA and Nato are not worried fron the capture of equipment. Remember how many veichle have been left in Afghanistan ? It is quite easy to buy a Bradley or any Nato veichle there. The problem is to copy them and to bild them . The Nato and Usa veichle are very expendive. That make them uncopiable. A T90 cost about 2 million an Abram 10 million. The Usa has the money . Russia not.

[@johnq8792]

Billions available for foreign wars butvery little for your own people

[@brandonc5965]

Its a huge mine field where they screwed up going up

[@cinorikese5890]

I bet some ukrainian dude is selling them to Russia and now lives in Monaco.

[@Lady_in_blackMsk]

В конце концов мы русские победим потому, что наши мужчины сильные.

[@user-nf2le3xt7y]

завалите безымянным мясом как обычно, всегда воевали количеством

[@adamburns2452]

Remember when property of the USA Meant something lol

[@thomasjhenniganw]

Get a bit of cmmon sense. Your country sends these vehicles to Ukraine with the intention of killing Russians. You complain about the Russians defending themselves from these attempts kill them. The whole purpose behind war was to harm Russia. This is what the US wanted to do but failed. Of course, many young Russians were killed and American Senators such as Lindsey Graham considered the proxy war a cheap operation for the US

[@thomasjones1496]

Well they got a hold of one of our top Drones, That would and does worry me.

[@TellySavalas-or5hf]

Bradley , Patton , Pershing! When generals become Tanks.

[@ichimonjiguy]

1991 American technology shocked Russian to the core.

[@bubamaranovichok4901]

Effectiveness? What works in warm and dry environments, is not necessarily working in four season temperatures. And vice versa. But as comparison, very few Russian tanks were captured by any forces on the Earth.

[@lordphullautosear]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@cubed0724]

No, plenty of Russian steel death traps or tanks especially their T90 have been seized in Ukraine. But no ones anxious to capture Russian tanks given how the tanks have been found to be horribly outdated and inferior.

[@eddypan8]

You can't really capture scrap metal.

[@user-nf2le3xt7y]

просто их в основном уничтожают, нечего в них смотреть

[@ahmedmusa9821]

Based on the picture you posted on 2:40 it should be one truckter not two.

[@drcover6632]

Let's be reasonable; had the Bradley anything unknown to the Russians, it wouldn't had been in the frontline.

[@raizel2601]

Yes from what I know, it a older Bradley and it doesn’t have a critical component