Dr McLaughlin, thank you for investing your valuable time in creating these lectures and for sharing your knowledge with us.
@raptiformica96454 жыл бұрын
High quality content. As always from this channel..
@RonJohn634 жыл бұрын
These ships look to be a lot bigger than the Niña, Pinta, and Santa Maria.
@drraoulmclaughlin74234 жыл бұрын
Yes, Roman cargo ships were significantly larger with a cargo capacity two or three times greater than some later vessels (over 200 tons). But Roman ships had relatively simple sails and rigging. Modern scholars often call them ‘floating tubs’. It’s worth reading Lionel Casson, ‘Ships and Seamanship in the Ancient World’.
@drraoulmclaughlin74234 жыл бұрын
I wrote a section for 'The Great Trade Routes' which also considers the Age of Discovery www.amazon.co.uk/Great-Trade-Routes-History-Commerce/dp/1591143357
@Muhammad-sx7wr4 жыл бұрын
I'm impressed by historical documentaries.
@us3rG6 ай бұрын
Axum, rome, Persia and China
@perro49964 жыл бұрын
I have heard the Ethiopians claim to have the Ark of the covenant. It is in a church there. It is said that it was brougth by exile jews to Axum. I wonder if that is true.
@ibnyahud4 жыл бұрын
unlikely, Jewish sources (religious and historical) already have the Ark of Covenant lost in the aftermath of the sacking of Jerusalem and the Temple by the Nebuchadnezzar... when the Temple was rebuilt, it was with out such original regalia
@mussie123414 жыл бұрын
The ark history before axum empire
@eritreanhabesha20954 жыл бұрын
@@mussie12341 king solomun who he has child with queen of axumite empire saba was the 3rd king of Israel while queen saba was the 42nd queen of axum. How com you say that Dmit was away older than israelite empire
@gedamnagran16563 жыл бұрын
The ark was taken from the jews who came to our land in the arabian peninsula to fet protection. After they revolted against our king king caleb killed their king called dhu nwas(sharhabeel ). And he took the ark with him.
@perro49963 жыл бұрын
@ኢትዮ ኒጲኤል no some book by Graham hancock.
@ludigomhagama40232 жыл бұрын
Aksum back days was called abbysinia. Aksum empire did not extended to east Africa (Kenya, Tanzania, southern somalia uganda, Rwanda, Burundi and northern Mozambique, eastern congo. These countries are used to be called AZANIA. Big tortoise shells, ivory , gold are used to be available at somalia, Kenya , Tanzania and Mozambique. There is ancient town in Tanzania called Kilwa kisiwani , is the place or center for business between sofala (great Zimbabwe) and India, china, and Egypt. This town ruins still there. You can get history of" Kilwa kisiwani" from ancient books of china. It is an small island in Tanzania. Zanzibar is not an ancient city than Kilwa kisiwani. Do research. They used to have coins too.
@StopTheLiess Жыл бұрын
No Axum was Axum. We never claimed Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda etc as a part of Axum.
@simoneagle34 жыл бұрын
God bless you Dr!! You are the real person,you tell the world about our real history of Eritrea.Adulis was not just city it was a kingdom and it was still there before Axum. But let me correct you Zoskales was the king of Adulis. peoplepill.com/people/zoskales/ I prefer you to make video about MEDRI BAHRI Kingom(the first democratic kingdom). Thank you very much for telling the truth. Our history has been hijacked by Ethiopian but now it is time to speak the truth. Long live Eritrea 🇪🇷🇪🇷🇪🇷🇪🇷🇪🇷🇪🇷🇪🇷🇪🇷
@ahata72454 жыл бұрын
There were no Eritrea back then. We are talking about Axum.
@axumitedessalegn35494 жыл бұрын
You do know that all three habesha ethnic groups emerged out of axum right? Genetic studies shows Ahmara, gurage and tigray ethnic groups are genetically almost the same and share a Semitic language. They emerged out of Axum. There was no such thing as Ertiriea or Ethiopia back then. When axum fell the people of axum started migrating south and after some time segregated. All three groups can claim axum ancestory to a certain degree
@kevinhayes69334 жыл бұрын
Axumite Dessalegn do you happen to know how far back does this civilisation went
@axumitedessalegn35494 жыл бұрын
@@kevinhayes6933 If you mean Axum over 2000 years ago. It became prominent around 80bc but it probably was further back than that. The "habesha" people are a fairly new group that emerged out of this kingdom. Each one absorbed many cushtic tribes as they migrated south which is why you see the deviation in the languages.
@bircruz5554 жыл бұрын
Why do not you light a candle instead of complaining about the darkness? All that talk about Eritrea, Adulis, borders, the first democratic kingdom (oxymoron) and all that is in your head. Move on. You are stuck. Show vision.
@happyhealthy77864 жыл бұрын
Maybe we should aksum
@teddyissak27203 жыл бұрын
Completely misleading narration, what's your source for all those claims ? Is this your own interpretation or do you have legitimate written source for all these things you said here concerning ( the beginning and the end of the empire ) ?
@yordanostafla45572 жыл бұрын
There was a Coin that had been printed before 5he one you are showing. Do your Study throughly.
@tesfayberhe21833 жыл бұрын
The name ethiopia has nothing to do with Axumites but Agaezi tigray r the direct descendants of the former Axumite Aegazian . Axumite King Ezana him self wrote stated that the invaded ethiopia (Nubia) and became the 8th colony of his empire. No Axumite empire call him self as Ethiopian rather they called ethiopia to Nubians today’s Sudan. Please try to read history Axumites called them selves As Ageazian . They have nothing to do with the so called Solomon . It was 13 Egypt Coptic church fabricated story which has no connection with the reality on the ground . There is no any arecheological evidence out of Today’s Tigray highland eritrea . No Axumite findings in today’s ethiopia except in tigray please try to read the reality . Today’s ethiopia was made by Theodros just 170 ago0
@AMR_k4003 жыл бұрын
Its actually the opposite ezana mentioned defeating the agaz in akale guzay (eritrea) so what ure saying is gibberish
@StopTheLiess Жыл бұрын
@@AMR_k400 No that is our king and thats a name in our language. Stop the lies.
@SYLAR67132 жыл бұрын
Askum in somali means from the beginning or the birth place in Arabic means Aqsum the place they swear on it in Amharic it means the place of the king . This was the birt place of many kushitic and non kushitic speaking people back in days when Egypt was taken over by the romans this was the new kingdom of the Kushites who left from Mero in Present day sudan so they all moved here to safe guard their wealth and power . But Askum/Aqsum is far from the red sea and the Indian Ocean or any coast. So the question is who were the coastal people at that time from the red sea to the horn ? 🤔 they are the somalis of today read the Roman books of the red and Indian Ocean books the only kushitic speaking people who had ships and cities all across the red sea to the Indian Ocean were the somalis which the romans used to called them ( Berbers ) the Greeks used to called them ( Ethiopians ) even the arabs used to called them ( habasha ) the name samaale or somali was a new name that they took around from Irir Samaale ( Sac maale ) who was their founding father 4000 bce means the cow milkers like the name of Somali stands for ( so maal ) means go and milk it ( cows. Camels or goats) their ancient and pre-historic tradition was a Nomadic tribes who settle the coastal area of the red se back in 3100 bce according to the first ancient egyptian trips to the land of punt from the time of king sahuuraz of the old kingdom. So somalis were always in these coastal regions next to the red sea by 3100BCe .they were once called by the Greeks the ( sea people ) went to land cannan isreal today around 600BCe
@AMR_k4002 жыл бұрын
Interesting theory but ultimately false axum developed as one of the many trade outpost of the d'mt kingdom (ethiosabaean kingdom from1000bc-400/300bc) it became an independent kingdom most likely in 300bc when d'mt disappeared and split into many city states like matara,qohaito,millea,adulis,... While the rest were dependent on the trade of frankincense and myrrh and therefore suffered financial difficulties when ptolemaic Egypt issued heavy taxs on the product and when arabia/redsea were infested by pirates thus making trade difficult axum which had a diverse set of products(ivory,gold,emeralds,..) and a proximity to the interior of Ethiopia which made access to these products easy they survived and absorbed the other city states and made an empire for themselfs. The inhabitants of axum were semites and agaws who arrived in Ethiopia from 1000bc to 1ad (from 2000bc in case of the agaws),they spoke a semitic language called ge'ez and they payed no respects to sabaeans nor were they dominated by them in culture,language or anything else they were more similar to the himyarites ,axum and himyar had a shared distinct religion from the rest ,which in addition to the common semitic god athar featured other unique gods like mahrem and beher. Somalis never inhabited that part of Ethiopia the only cushitic people who lived around there were agaw(which at the time were multiple tribes) and beja who were mentioned by axumite inscriptions as distinct people from axumites and as subjects of the axumite from the 2nd century onward , between 200 and 360 ad they had conquered much of Ethiopia, eritrea,Djibouti, sudan southern egypt,small parts of yemen and saudiarabia plus northern parts of somalia, they weren't subjects or descendants of the kush as they would be the ones to finally conquer and destroy kush ending the ancient kingdom once and forall.
@StopTheLiess Жыл бұрын
Somali are Cush. You have to stop lying.
@StopTheLiess Жыл бұрын
Aksum is in Tigray. it is a Ge'ez word. Stop trying to connect to our history. You have your own.
@StopTheLiess Жыл бұрын
no Abyssinia means two words. Habesh is, arabic pronunciation of Abyss.. T @@AMR_k400
@BF-bb5us Жыл бұрын
@@AMR_k400 Axum was endegenous no evidence of significant influence from outside and there are no semitic people it is a language family
@headdragondavidaustinsimmo40252 жыл бұрын
2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 years ago I said you don't slave people or you have to pay them 4 gold 20 silver they crucified me Ishmael
@Puritan19854 жыл бұрын
How did he gain his power? Through Jihad of course.
@ribbitgoesthedoglastnamehe46814 жыл бұрын
I guess you think its awfully funny and are real proud of yourself, but you are mistaken by some 1000 years, and misrepresent both the functionality of jihad and the nature of local religion and the people.
@fuferito3 жыл бұрын
So, you think Axumite Kings were Muslim? You thought you were so clever with your joke.
@Puritan19853 жыл бұрын
@@fuferito You are not even worthy to be taste my shoe. You are less than a plastic shower flip flop. worn by America.
@Zeyede_Seyum2 жыл бұрын
@@fuferito it's a joke dummy.
@gedamnagran16563 жыл бұрын
Garabage full of lies. First of all the aksum kingdom were included the halve saudi Arabia, yemen, Oman halve Sudan and the northern part of Somalia and northern part of ethiopia up to the lake of tsana and the semien mauntain. Even though it is inhabited now by some different tribes called now amhara this were our territory. The different tribes (amhara) were came to this area to Get protection from the islamic invention or they werer brought from Sudan by king ezana and giving the a plot of land in begemdir(biga midr).
@kukulu38903 жыл бұрын
Brought by Ezana?😂😂 the amhara are the descendants of the agazians aka axumites the empire extends to shewa that's why washa Michael is in current day Addis Ababa the axumites were settling on the lands that they conquered that's why there were Christian abyssinians in zaila even after it's fall according to arab travelers that visited zaila during those times and cus yodit's destruction and bejas invasion the royalties and the military were displaced to shewa/wollo that's why the throne was claimed by amharas and not tigrays
@gedamnagran16563 жыл бұрын
@@kukulu3890 first of all amhara have no right to claim the throne. If you blieve the history fabricated by the coptic orthodox fary tale you will miss. The fabrication of the solomolnian daynasty is Simply rabish. There were no any jews civilization in our area. There were no any king called minelik in the aksum. The jews were not ancient people in our area like arabs. They are Booth armenian(assyrian). Our kingdom were much ancient and vast. Even extended to the three continents. Secondly what i want to say is you to differntiate between amhara and amara. Amhara as you said they r tigrians. But amara are not. This amhara tribe are very very few in number. But amara are different tribes But forcefully amharanized people. For example gaffat, argoba, sinnsha, weyto, kufit, agew, kemant, minjar and others in which they more than 20 different tribes. Out all this tribes in which it has its own local languages Only a very few are amhara(tigrians). Why they called amhara and why they go there We will tell you. The problem in our area are this amara not amhara. This different tribes called amhara are the main problem to ethiopia and east africa. Because they r to much confused because they were dittached from their original identity and they think as if they own every thing. Once you confronted with all the evidence they tried to hide Only We know We r ethiopians.
@gedamnagran16563 жыл бұрын
@@kukulu3890 yes they were brought by ezana like the people living in begemdir(biga midr) in our language were brought to this area by king ezana. Know they called amhara. This is historical fact and well recorded. The name it self biga midr is the evidence that support our history. This area is our area But given to the by ezana. All most all the names in amhara region are tigrinja names. But the amhara corrupted it name for example to the lake tsana( they call it Tana) if you Ask what is the meaning of Tana no one explain it. Tsegede to tegede, biga midr to begemdir exct....
@kukulu38903 жыл бұрын
@@gedamnagran1656 dedeb😂😂 it doesn't matter if the solomon story was true or fairytale yekuno-amlak claimed the throne by saying he was the descendant of Dilnaod the last king of axum an amhara prince from shewa/wollo wouldn't claim the throne if the story of the royalties and major population of the axumites fleeing south wasn't known during that time that's why none of the komalats from tigray didn't claim to be one and didn't confront him cus he was the descendant of the last king of axum. And for the assimilation thing amharas are agews plus agazians that's where we got our African dna from just like the tigrayans are they got their African dna from an indigenous cushtic tribe maybe agew or whatever.. and for all the tribes you mentioned exist this is just like saying tigray people are a combination of irob, beja, kunama, tembien, enderta, agame,.. and the like lol
@kukulu38903 жыл бұрын
@@gedamnagran1656 dude there was no tigringna during axum time😂😂😂 in fact amharic existed even the many of the names of the royalty of axum has names that don't categorize in any of the current Ethiosemitic languages except amharic lol but Tigrigna was created after axums fall after 10th C so what you are saying doesn't even make sense and Ezana wasn't tigray he was a geez speaker not tigrinya meaning the ancestor of amhara