"How do you Administer an Oath of Office to Eknath Shinde?"- Sibal ⚖️

Supreme Court of India
Maharashtra Crisis
AM Singhvi
Shiv Sena
CJI DY Chandrchud
Kapil Sibal
Uddhav Thackerey
Eknath Shinde
Tushar Mehta
The ‘real’ Shiv Sena
Law Role
📚 This Video is strictly for Legal Awareness & Education Purpose only
📚 Video Topic :
🔥 In the Shiv Sena crisis and Eknath Shinde's role, Kapil Sibal's question, "How do you administer an oath of office to Eknath Shinde?" refers to the controversy surrounding Shinde's leadership claim and the constitutional and legal issues regarding his position.
1. Shiv Sena Split and Leadership Dispute: Eknath Shinde led a faction of the Shiv Sena, which caused a split within the party. Shinde's group claimed to be the real Shiv Sena, while the other faction, led by Uddhav Thackeray, argued against this claim. The crisis centered on which faction held legitimate control over the party.
2. Kapil Sibal's Legal Challenge: Sibal, a senior advocate and politician, represented the Uddhav Thackeray faction in legal proceedings. His question likely highlights the perceived lack of constitutional or procedural legitimacy in administering the oath of office to Shinde. This could be due to questions about whether Shinde's claim to leadership followed the due process or whether he had the majority support required to take on such a role.
3. Oath of Office and Legal Questions: Administering the oath of office generally involves a formal process where a person assumes a government position. In this case, Sibal may be questioning the legal and ethical grounds under which Shinde was being considered for or had already taken an oath to a significant position, such as Chief Minister, after the political crisis.
📑 Fair Use Policy
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
Subscribe our Channel : / @lawroletv
Watch Latest Post : / @lawroletv
🎥 : Queries Solved :
law today, indian supreme court, abhinav chandrachud, electoral bonds, friday group supreme court, legal, live supreme court, cji chandrachud son, indian news live, sibal, kapil sibal supreme court live, caa hearing, live, article 370, cji on caa live, bond scam, court, supreme court hindi, supreme court videos, what is caa in india, rohit arya judge, cji chandrachud live court, citizenship in indian constitution, kapil sibbal, tushar mehta, prasant bhushan, attorney general, harish salve, vijay hansaria, shyam divan, am singhv, uddhav thackerey, eknath shinde, shivsena, caa, citizenship act, prashant bhushan, cji chandrachud, attorney general, cji dy chandrachud, supreme court,
🔗 Relevant Hashtags:
#supremecourt #bhfyp #india #follow #indianconstitution #ambedkar #mahatmagandhi #law #lawofattraction #supremecourtofindia #lawofattraction #judge #lawyers #maharashtra #lawyer #lawget #lawenforcement #legal #legaladvice #subscribetomychannel #subscribers #subscriber #sub #legaleducation #legalservices #legalnews #legalknowledge #highcourt #patnahighcourt #gujarathighcourt #kolkatahighcourt #bombayhighcourt #courtlive #barcouncil #barcouncilofindia #lawstudent #freedom #babasahebambedkar #indianlawyer #kapilsibal #shyamdivan #prashantbhushan #tusharmehta #singhvi #singhvi #indianlaw #chandrachud #cji #electoralbonds #learnlaw #argument #ias #ips #police #judiciary #motivation #2024 #criminaljustice
👍 Remember to like, comment, and share if you found this video helpful!
🙌 Thanks for watching!

[@1959dilip]

The issue is not Eknnath, Why Shiv Sena alliance with BJP broke, and all should have gone to President rule, till both come together. Or fresh elections . Political parties defied people's mandate to alliance. SC should lay down law..pre poll alliance can't be broken...

[@happyhome2071]

Why you are arguing that government time going to be completed in a month are you still believe our court when the judgement come after complainant death no use of that judgement the government should implement a law certain time line otherwise citizens of India not trust the judiciary system.even now nobody's trusted judiciary system in our country.