How Dobbs v. Jackson Was Decided | Criminalizing Abortion

A brief look at how Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health that overturned the constitutional right to an abortion was decided and how it could have turned out differently.
• When Does Life (Person... When Does Life (Personhood) Begin? (Criminalizing Abortion)
Support My Work: ko-fi.com/drbs...
Subscribe: bit.ly/drbsullyyt
www.DrBSully.com
#abortion #womensrights #roe

[@DrBSully]

When Does Life (Personhood) Begin?kzbin.info/www/bejne/on3cgn-ErJJrptU (Criminalizing Abortion)

[@_Chuck]

Exactly what amendment said abortion was legal?

[@gopher7691]

A human beings life begins at conception as the sciences of embryology and genetics tell us. Killing it for convenience at any point after that is murder

[@gopher7691]

Personhood as used by prochoicers is shorthand for the developmental stage of a human being at which it deserves legal protection from being killed. It is never clear exactly what they mean. Some say viability. Others say birth. Others say brain development. Peter Singer would say a month or so after birth (talk about pro choice!). It is used by pro choicers to delude themselves and others into thinking abortion for convenience isn’t murder. Pro choicers abuse language in other ways to keep up the delusion. Abortion is described imprecisely as “termination of pregnancy”. Of course birth terminates pregnancy. So does a miscarriage. A caesarean section also terminates pregnancy. So why do pro choicers use this phrase to describe killing of an unborn human being? To ask the question is to answer it. Laws banning abortion for convenience are described as “forced birth”. Laws against infanticide could be described as “forced fatherhood” I suppose.

[@gopher7691]

Yes choiceland is an Orwellian world where language is not used to express the truth but to hide a crime.

[@denniswakabayashi9000]

​@@gopher7691 Simple biology destroys the belief that the conception is already a human being Since 2 or more human beings can come from the same conception/zygote cell. Educate yourself!

[@kburd67]

Theocracy is Fascism

[@stes_]

Such a shame

[@hwd71]

As long as women can order through the mail abortion pills , abortion is still legal in all 50 States. #abolitionistsrising #sethgruber #secularprolife

[@fungamesonly6521]

I'm so happy about this

[@denverbeek]

'Til it affects you or, God forbid, grow a conscience.

[@someman7]

The child is not the woman's body of course. Your right to wave your fist ends where another's face begins. Come on you know this. Thank God murder is finally not protected under the law

[@denverbeek]

It's not a living being, it's an unconscious collection of cells. You don't feel guilty of murdering bacteria when you wash your hands, do you?

[@fungamesonly6521]

@@denverbeek same argument people would use for slaves - "it's not a real human, it's inferior!". Humans make humans. The fetus is alive, and is human. It is young, therefore is a baby. It does not matter that people that in the early stages it's unconscious, there's unconscious people every day, it would still be wrong to kill them.

[@someman7]

@@denverbeek I do not feel guilty murdering bacteria, no. I would feel guilty murdering people, however. Whether they're conscious or not, whether big or small, whether fully developed or not is irrelevant. What matters is that these few cells are a whole human organism, so you're not killing bacteria-equivalent life. You are killing human life, a human being. And of course it is living, if it weren't it wouldn't be growing and developing. Biology teaches that life begins at conception. Human life begins at human conception.

[@andredunbar3773]

Does someone have the right to take/use any of your organs without your permission?

[@Faint366]

If the right to wave your fist ends at another’s face then a fetus’s right to life ends when it requires the use of someone else’s body. In case you didn’t know, a uterus is part of a woman’s body, not part of a fetus.