How Does SpaceX Get These Amazing Camera Shots?

Have you ever wondered how SpaceX gets such smooth tracking shots of rockets moving at incredibly fast speeds? In this video, I talk about the camera equipment that's used now and how it was used in the past.
This is Primal Space's very first video. If you enjoyed it, let me know and be sure to subscribe to learn more.
References:
primalnebula.c...
Support Primal Space by becoming a Patron!
/ primalspace
Follow Primal Space on Social Media.
Twitter: / theprimalspace
Facebook: / theprimalspace
#PrimalSpace #SpaceX

[@HakmanTim]

Isn’t it obvious? They build another rocket and strap a GoPro to it

[@nilsliebrand8294]

That would be an amazing perspective to watch

[@nishant_thite]

😂😂😂

[@p4uli]

Nah, would be a Supra

[@zachprouty8595]

@@nilsliebrand8294 yeah just watching 10 rockets taking off and the 9 others circling one with cameras

[@hoghogwild]

@@nilsliebrand8294 There are some amazing shots of the space shuttle Solid Rocket Boosters(SRB) separating from the shuttle stack, viewed from the orbiter. Here are the NASA ascent highlight videos from the last 3 STS(Space Transportation System) missions in 2011. STS-133 kzbin.info/www/bejne/oZLcdH-ZlpaMg8U STS-134-kzbin.info/www/bejne/eoCai3Wmaa2Lh6M and STS-135 kzbin.info/www/bejne/qIetdYx_ZqeEd5Y These videos are some of the best available. HUNDREDs of millions of dollars worth of equipment dedicated to capturing ascent/entry video for NASA/AirForce/NRO etc..

[@TheSpiderJem]

1:23 My friends when I tell them to record something for me with my phone.

[@rayhib]

100th like

[@exhale7873]

HAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAH HAHAHAHA R u CoMeDiAn?

[@SGprooo]

MJ gay

[@lordadams5762]

😂

[@slothymango]

@@exhale7873 you literally sound like the saddest person alive 😂😂 who tf comments that to a little joke😂😂😂

[@calamantegroup]

1:18 laughed so hard lol

[@gtsyptr3708]

same lol

[@aqimjulayhi8798]

Same here. Hahahaha

[@steph77491]

"SpaceX intensifies"

[@anttica1798]

How hard?

[@Ilman01]

Rescue Crew - Oficial yea lol

[@Jonathan-ru9zl]

You have a professional voice.

[@Forgan_Mreeman]

YOU should hear my professional farts

[@awiseseal7559]

Sir, your farts are deadly.

[@jalene150]

SEAGULL POLICE more like “godly” 😂

[@gavingynert2455]

@@Forgan_Mreeman I'd love to create a scent of them!

[@Rhyme905]

he uses a professional voice manipulator to change it so it sounds perfect

[@cubfan]

Great video and cinematography. Looking forward to more.

[@rwj1313]

Skipping Stones "why are there no support ships around the barges during the landings" This past Tuesday (Feb 6th, 2018) the center core of the Falcon Heavy had 2 of the 3 engines fail to operate during the landing phase. The core of a Falcon 9 is about 140 feet (42.67 m) tall and 12 feet (3.66 m) in diameter and weighs about 45,000 lbs (20,411.66 kg) when it lands. It's landing speed just prior to touchdown is normally about 1.47 m/s which is about 3.29 mph. The engine failure resulted in the core slamming into the ocean at over 300 mph (482.80 kph). There is very little incentive to risk putting any other watercraft in the imediate landing area due to the risk of being hit by a 45,000 lb missile traveling at 300 mph.

[@rwj1313]

Skipping Stones stated "I guess you meant to write that 1 of the 3 rockets failed to operate correctly on February 6. The 2 boosters landed safely on land." No, that is NOT what a meant. The Falcon Heavy is made up of 3 cores. There are a center core and a left and a right core. Each core has 9 engines. During the landing phase, only 3 of the 9 engines are fired. In the case of the left and right cores, the ones that everybody saw land, the 3 engines fired properly. I stated, "the center core of the Falcon Heavy had 2 of the 3 engines fail to operate during the landing phase." That statement was and is correct. Skipping Stones also stated "Your response is weird, though; it's almost like you are trying to find some lame-ass excuse for there not being a support fleet for the barge. The risk is too high? Do you think so? Spectators were able to watch the take off of Falcon Heavy and the landings of the 2 boosters on land from areas that were considered to be located at a safe distance." You may not like my response but it is accurate. According to "Google Earth" launch pad 39A is 3.16 miles East of the viewing area. All rockets leaving Cape Canaveral execute a "roll program" as soon as they clear the launch tower. The maneuver is used to place the spacecraft on a proper heading toward its intended orbit. The proper heading is, for the most part, East, which is away from land and spectators. There are 2 primary reasons for launching to the East of the Cape. The first is pretty obvious. Safety. The second is not so obvious. The Earth rotates at 1,000 mph. Rockets that leave the Cape on an Easterly heading gain a 1,000 mph of speed. That is a huge and free increase in velocity. During the launch, multiple "range safety officers" have the ability to destroy an off-course rocket. The Falcon 9 also has a thing called the Flight Termination System or FTS. The FTS can command the remote destruction of the vehicle. During a launch, any rocket that deviates even slightly to the West will be destroyed by the range safety officers or the FTS. The landings take place 9.37 miles South-East of the viewing area. The Falcon Heavy cores fly a very precise course when returning to the landing areas. Once again, any deviation from the pre-programmed course will result in range safety officers or the FTS destroying the rocket. The landing barge or ASDS (Autonomous Spaceport Drone Ship) is an entirely different matter. The ASDS is in the ocean and it moves. Rockets landing on the ASDS are allowed to deviate from the pre-programmed course by a significant amount. The ASDS can accurately locate itself with GPS but the pitching and rolling cannot be controlled. Rockets landing on the ASDS have been observed making very radical moves to orient properly during landing. There are numerous reasons why the center core can end up "long" or "short" of its preplanned flight-path. A core returning from a path that deviated "long" or "short" can cause the rocket to fly over a much larger area of the ocean during its landing approach. It is just NOT safe to put humans anywhere near a rocket returning from space on a course that is not exact. The FTS program for Falcon 9's returning to the ASDS is vastly different than the FTS for the F9's that land on land. NASA had the entire US Navy at their disposal during Apollo and during the Space Shuttle era. SpaceX does not. Supporting the emplacement of the ASDS are two vessels: the 82-foot-long (25-meter) Elsbeth III tug and the 164-foot-long (50-meter) Go Quest support boat. With a maximum speed of around 5.6 knots, the Elsbeth III is responsible for bringing the gigantic ASDS to its oceanic position, whilst the faster Go Quest-capable of up to 12.1 knots-takes up a support position, laden with communications and tracking equipment. Not having to pay the US Navy for support vehicles is one of the many ways that SpaceX keeps their cost down. "Super Genius Elon Musk" does, in fact, have commercially available GoPros on the recovery barge. And they do record the landings. The videos are on KZbin. No sane engineer is going to risk their lives to record a rocket landing just to satisfy a flat-Earther or some other variation of someone that thinks SpaceX is a hoax.

[@rwj1313]

bee zap stated "shit is all fake wake up you fools" Well, I guess if you say so, it must be true! You could drink a million cans of Red Bull and it wouldn't wake you up. Maybe you and your genius flat-earth experts can explain to the fine citizens of Olcott, New York what it is that they see when they look across Lake Ontario towards Toronto. This video takes a mere 13 seconds to show just how stupid flat-earthers really are. kzbin.info/www/bejne/r2O9ZmmZqrKZrLc I eagerly await your reply.

[@rwj1313]

Skipping Stones stated "BTW: Sane engineers don't need to satisfy Flat Earthers; they need to satisfy their own high demands for understanding what exactly happened. I guess you are not an engineer, Rick Jones." A sane engineer will understand exactly what happened by studying the data from instrumentation.

[@quantum3472]

Omg cub, i watch you why are you here

[@TheBluRayCritic]

Easy, humans film from ground and aliens in space. Collaboration folks.

[@emmanuelekondu]

this comment is so underrated 😂

[@johnvistica6146]

Thanks for the video. I've always wondered about the equipment that gives us the great launch shots. My favorite shots are the F9 boosters dropping through the atmosphere just prior to the landing burn (0:10)...you get a sense of the insane engineering necessary to pull off landing a booster engines first.

[@kenduwins]

Another subscriber here. Amazing production quality and a great voice. My significant other asked questions about the camera tracking during the last launch, which this video explains better than I would. Thanks a lot, appreciate your efforts and look forward to more.

[@zombielover317able]

Primal Space why did you say that the Columbia was destroyed on reentry clearly the rocket was going up and when I was a child watching it in high school we watched it on TVs and guess what it blew up on its way up and not on reentry it's a simple lie like that or not doing your detective work on your information

[@8eightP]

Columbia =/= Challenger

[@Woah595]

@@zombielover317able you are probably thinking of challenger which exploded shortly into its flight, Columbia exploded on reentry. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Columbia

[@bailey125]

*beware of incoming conspiracy theorists that are gonna use this as evidence of faking the launch*

[@kevikella221]

Yes spaceX is the real thing baby! All those other space happenings were faked but this is the real deal...

[@esaudiarabia4676]

@@kevikella221 you're a real idiot

[@ameladamasco5298]

@@kevikella221 So you didn't appreciate the last predecessors did? What a shame are you..

[@KaykyG018]

i hope you are joking, because i can't handle the level of stupidity also don't get offended this is the internet since 90s

[@kooljawss]

Johnston Steiner do u not remember space shuttle Columbia?

[@AndriusDyrikis]

Seriously where are the views and the subscribers??, great video.

[@blackkissi]

This account was created 29 January 2018, and this is the first video.

[@zombielover317able]

Andrius Dyrikis will because he's lying the Columbia blew up on entry into space notri entry back towards Earth

[@gokickme1369]

please let me kick you in the nuts you moron.

[@tuncaydemirtepe7978]

Good video about ground cameras, could you make another one to explain cameras on the rockets? ie: 2 cameras that show stage separation on Falcon9.

[@DoktorIgnaz]

I would love to know that too!

[@nolsp7240]

Tuncay Demirtepe Yup. Also, do you have any info on the cameras they mounted on the Tesla payload?

[@myfrequencies1912]

& why they couldn't/wouldn't/didn't show us the car leaving the payload bay....

[@LukeNbuchanan]

I would love to see this. The stability of those camera feeds is remarkable.

[@SeedlingNL]

The car didn't leave the payload bay, only the fairings were expelled. It remains firmly attached to the final stage. An actual satellite would be seperated and do the final orbital corrections using it's own fuel.

[@peterwmdavis]

Very well done video. Looking forward to more

[@guilhermeantao9875]

1:18 This was actually pretty hilarious, the only thing we hear is the rocket and everything is shaking :D

[@Danny_Ambarita]

I can’t stop laughing at the handheld tracking shots 🤣. That is insane comparison. Awesome review my friend. Even your voice recording sounds pro! Looking forward to the next video.

[@RakibHasan-455]

Plot twist: They use After Effects to reduce the trembling camera shot.

[@Tradingpassion]

This channel cleared my question of How does spaceX get clear views of camera shots. Thank you Primal space. 💖

[@ubayyd]

Wow you need 100 times more subscribers and views. This was a *great* video, even more so seeing as this is your first video. Really looking forward to your content!👍👍

[@ubayyd]

I'm your 1854th subscriber!😅

[@jalene150]

If they make more videos of this quality, they will quickly grow

[@AdariousMistdancer]

count me in too

[@sylvilaguscunicularius3155]

Very well done video and great cinematography. Looking forward to more.

[@ZamanS.]

Can these cameras film something that is about to re-enter the earth's atmosphere?

[@matrix9452]

they would need to know the exatc position of the object in order to do that

[@MichaelOrtega]

Yes they do it all the time with SpaceX’s boosters when they come back. I fact there is a video that doesn’t stop that filmed the rocket, the separation of the booster, and the re-entry to earth all the way down to landing. Some of the clips were used in this very same video here 0:07 the shot of the rocket going down is part of this same video I’m talking about.

[@jessiebullock]

Only one video?!? It’s so good! You’ve earned a subscription from me.

[@CodeCely]

They used Nikon P900

[@yetihassyphilis5095]

*Nikon P90X

[@CodeCely]

Yeti Has Syphilis nope its 900

[@yetihassyphilis5095]

Mauz Shaikh the joke flew over your head

[@zachj3483]

Yeti Has Syphilis lol

[@mikkokormann6814]

Mauz Shaikh r/wooosh

[@JGAN]

the narration was relaxing and awesome. keep the good work!

[@turdsandwich7648]

Nice editing dude.

[@angelofmandalaypadlock9704]

The whole things is fake

[@fotosniper]

Angel of Mandalay Padlock nope. Just your education

[@GMoney-B]

Angel of Mandalay Padlock don’t you know that if you must insist on putting your head in a microwave, that it can reduce your brain damage by 70% if you first take off your tin foil hat? Duh. 🙄

[@dr4t]

Always wondered how they take those shots, and your vid answered the question perfectly. Very well done! Subbed.

[@NightmaresBTW]

I subscribed yesterday when you were at 1900 subscribers and now you're over 4K. Still waiting for new videos! 🔥

[@NightmaresBTW]

You're welcome, can't wait! 👍🏻

[@DEADB33F]

It's always funny to me how these awesome HD cameras SpaceX use always without fail seem to mysteriously fail if the craft crashes on landing. I love SpaceX, but would love them even more if we got to see the failures in as much detail as we see the successes. Explosions are cool, I just wanna see more!

[@mattmorrismedia]

1:03 The camera needs to 'Tilt' up. Pan = left to right Tilt = up and down

[@Alucard-gt1zf]

It does also need to pan as rockets don't ascend in a straight vertical direction but yeah

[@MAHDEO]

Sir, i like your voice ...... Your tone and style is simply amazing ... May god bless you !!!!

[@SuprAtheAceofSpades]

Wow, I didn't realize this was the first video on the channel. Surprisingly great quality and editing! Looking forward to more.

[@Sham9909]

As a cameraman I have always wondered what made getting these shots possible. Now I know.

[@My-Pal-Hal]

Camera Shots are Easy. Making the Rocket to film,.. That's Hard lol.

[@wolfie_studio1082]

That's what she said!! *Slaps my knee*

[@daviddehaan6182]

True... I had a Polaroid Land Camera....

[@tonyactudiversesenfrance8007]

Whaoo Amazing vidéo 👍

[@ThePikachuGaming3978]

The start of a great channel

[@primalspace]

🙏🙏🙏

[@neoexplains]

Great Video! I am curious, do you know why NASA still uses some analog Film cameras? I was quite suprised to hear that. What advantage does it give them over using a digital one?

[@agildehaus]

This video autoplayed for me after watching a SpaceX webcast. Subbed! Keep it up.

[@benglassop]

Did you make this video? Insane where are all the subscribers! Thank you sir

[@edrosie24]

You pan left and right, you tilt up and down. YOU DO NOT PAN UP.

[@Sammyv17]

Maybe he uses 3D programs where panning is left, right, up, and down and just mixed it up a little.

[@yobuddy2920]

He was holding the camera sideways :p

[@tom_something]

What is the concise nomenclature for panning the camera to the right while also tilting up?

[@tom_something]

Lol, wow.

[@bobsagget823]

Cry about it you fucking moron. Nobody cares.

[@severussnape5171]

Awesome video, been wondering about the exact their methods of obtaining those cool shots

[@FictualKyle]

Their shots are actually garbage compared to nasa's

[@laserfloyd]

I agree. I mean, I think they're 'good' but NASA had shuttle launches jam packed with cameras. Mostly for engineering purposes but for space nerds it's all amazing to watch. I'd love to see as many cameras in place for SpaceX.

[@sebatsituab3955]

laserfloyd Im waiting for the flat earth comments

[@FnD4212]

I know right, SpaceX camera make surface look curvature, while Nasa camera make surface look flat. So NASA camera shot better than SpaceX.

[@Ivarinjs]

Very pleasant video. Good job and hurry up with next one!

[@flightsoul6148]

idk why but i died when he explained how a person would record it with a tripod

[@TheZacdes]

yehh, you would use a very stable computer controlled mount at least,lol

[@stcrussman]

"very difficult" Maybe not, f*cking amazing, yeah. Great piece man.

[@benferm150]

AND they have Benjamin Higginbotham. :)

[@kenfolked]

Greetings from Norway. Very impressed by your video, particularly since this was your first. Subscribed and looking forward to your next production.

[@CUBETechie]

Why they shoot a car in space? I know it was a carry load why they don't shoot flat earther in the rocket? For example that guy with the steam powered rocket which go only 500m or so

[@grendelum]

CUBETechie - who do you think is in the Starman space suit? Best disposal of a body *_ever._*

[@realulli]

No use, they're too lightweight. Spacex needed something solit to really test the rocket... ;-)

[@Harry-is6vn]

How about all of the flat earthers

[@neutronstar6739]

Nah, their brain is too lightweight for it to be used as a dummy payload.

[@theultimatereductionist7592]

As badly as I would love to see all flatties shot into space, I am DESPERATE to shoot all Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) deniers shot into space.

[@AnaheimElectronicsInc.]

Very educational and professional! Subbed! :D

[@alexlo7708]

Untold part of the story is they knew object trajectory they know equation of that motion then they put it to kalmann filter program put in estimated noise and then the camera will control automatically lock on to the rocket. So the picture is fine and still.

[@DeathValleyDazed]

Your excellent videos bring depth and texture to an already stimulating space age. Thanks!

[@addisonmartin730]

Just subscribed!

[@wildwombat]

wow, nice video. I am not sure why in my head, I had explained it to myself that the extreme closeup camera on take off, were in fact some kind of 'heat register cam'. Where it would track the hottest part of the rocket/ engines.

[@elonmusk6631]

Because we’re the best

[@robb5828]

Hurry up witht the Big Focking Rocket ( BFR )

[@wolfie_studio1082]

Hope your able to back up the hype your talking. #daretodream

[@GuyInc0gnit0]

Great video! Awesome topic! Soothing voice! More please!

[@Jonathan-ru9zl]

Great video! How much time it took you to edit the video?

[@knegarkarlsson1275]

jonatan jonathan, är det du? Hej!

[@markusgrabherr6125]

Very nice video, you definetly will get more subscribers very fast! Also I have two questions: First, how are the high-fps cameras which are directly at the launchpad shielded agains the heat? Especially the Saturn V ones, where the grass around the launchpad got roasted. And secondly, how are the SpaceX top mounted cameras protected against the enormous heat range in leo? Would be great if you could answer that.

[@makara]

Pans are left-right, not up-down. You tilt a camera up-down.

[@Mp57navy]

What if you rotate the camera 90 degrees in the lens bracket?

[@makara]

It doesn't change anything

[@hammad8954]

Imagine if a rocket vehicle was developed just to film the main launch while being launched simultaneously to capture footage HOW COOL WOULD THAT BE!

[@TembotKerefov]

Great video! What's the launch on 00:10? Looks really amazing

[@Martinit0]

That's a Falcon 9 landing - you can see only the center thruster is operating.

[@89tin]

Amazon is showing three of those cameras for sale right now. Looks like they are merchant filled and listed in good condition/used.

[@ThePRIORexistence]

GPS tracking, remember for under $500 bucks a drone can follow you on your mountain bike through a trail

[@Yumemaru.]

Recovered Tracks that's badass

[@mittfh]

Except the civilian GPS algorithm automatically shuts down above a certain speed and above a certain altitude to ensure it can't be used by miscreants to build a guided missile.

[@skepticmoderate5790]

mittfh It's just a limitation built into the chips. There's nothing preventing you from re-flashing the firmware and removing the limitation. GPS satellites work by broadcasting the signal anyway. There is no actual two-way communication between satellite and receiver.

[@wolfie_studio1082]

This comment is so out of place, what's with the irrelevant topic!?

[@gokickme1369]

Great video. but you didn't talk about how they get the landing shots! especially out to sea. we need a part 2!

[@robybabe4461]

Can someone please explain why the tyres on the car haven't exploded in the vacuum of space?

[@cogoid]

Why should they? Regular tires explode at about 200 psi. Which means when the pressure inside the tire is by 200 psi greater than the pressure outside the tire. Since they were not inflated to 200 psi, changing outside pressure from the normal 14.7 psi to 0 psi would not make a significant difference. Temperature variations could probably be more damaging. But if you noticed, the rocket was made to slowly rotate, such that heating from the sunlight would be compensated by cooling in the shadow, so that the average temperature would not get too extreme. (Incidentally, this also provides the great views.) Also, SpaceX mechanics did a good bit of work to prepare the car for the trip -- they removed everything that would not survive the launch, or can be a hazard to the rocket. The car looks good, but is no longer a road worthy vehicle. So we cannot even assume that the tires are inflated in the regular way -- the people who prepared the car for the trip would have certainly thought about all this.

[@mcfjk3]

Maybe they didn't put any air in them?

[@tumenihits5438]

Maybe they thought that they should open the air valves, or remove the air valves, or drill holes in the non-visible parts of the tyres, such that any residual air in them would equalise with the vacuum of its own accord as the craft ascended. I'm not a rocket scientist. That's what I would do. What would you have done?

[@nasanchez964]

Tumeni Hits are taking into account that they're not puny and fragile balloons? The pressure a tire must handle is waaaaaaaaay greater than the atmosphere around it. Also, they could even be out of any air, ever thought about that simple fact? But even if they did put air in them, the difference in pressure from the inside earth's atmosphere compared to the pressure inside the tires is negligible. Use your fucking brain.

[@tumenihits5438]

I think you're agreeing with me, but I can't figure why you're being so rude about it

[@canyonoverland5003]

You have an excellent command of the English language. Well done, sir!

[@UshasRides]

Amazing! Would like more technical info about the cameras and the programs used to control them. Also who supplies them. Thanks - love this kind of stuff :)

[@JBA512]

2:59 i want space x to do shots like this too ... sooo good

[@n.vdhooven7437]

great video, I enjoyed watching it and learned something, looking forward for more.

[@corb.6837]

Those "Canito" tracking mounts are actually laser weapon systems.

[@miked3723]

Wow the camera's have come so far in technology and quality! Why have the rockets they record become less capable?

[@tinkageorgewilliam871]

We really have come along way indeed.

[@donkoh5738]

Was this a real voice, or some kind of next-gen automated voice capability? Either way, was a very interesting vid to view!

[@mypicturesbox]

Am I the only one who noticed the KZbin Premiere music in the background?

[@yeyeite]

wow! great work! keep it up!

[@kenshirotakamura7860]

dude you need more subs man! you are so good!

[@sztrapesz]

It was always a big question for me. Thank you for the proper answer!!!

[@RSpudieD]

Such a good video that explained it so well!

[@foxmccloud7055]

These types of cameras and film cameras also came in handy to find where the joint in the solid rocket boosters failed on Challenger before the accident killing seven astronauts including Christa McAuliffe.

[@tranquangthai6764]

thank you. This is amazing video

[@王雷-m1l]

Very nice for this job thanks you and I thinking about what a little problem you just so seriously do it , respect to you.

[@nathanieljonathan4275]

I'm laughing so hard when it comes with manual panning 😂 great video btw

[@pauldelcour]

Brilliant, great to understand how this is done.

[@RawSpaceVideos]

500k views and 8k+ subscribers in 1 month from your first video? Good heavens. Excellent video, incidentally. Did it simply go viral, or do you have another popular channel from which you referred people over here? You certainly appear to have experience in video production and narration from somewhere. :-)

[@tobiasyoder]

so this is what my wildlife photography has been missing....

[@MozTS]

2:34 has the sickest looking xbox controller ive ever seen

[@NFA80731]

Amazing video !!!

[@AgnostosGnostos]

Simply cameras are mounted on telescopes which have gyroscopes and precise and programmable stepping motors. The trajectory of a rocket after launch is predicted and the movement and zoom can be partly programmed. Ordinary lenses for photography permit shallow depth of field which give a 3D effect to the photos and make objects to differentiate from the surroundings.

[@fernandomacias7680]

Great video!

[@Dj3ndo]

Wonderful content!

[@notAvn]

talking about cameras i like how spacex r still streaming in 720 p in 2020

[@AndySnap]

Fascinating!

[@justinb9271]

Lol most of those shots of the white ‘camera’ is actually the navy’s high energy frikkin’ Laser Weapon System (LaWS).

[@ruzainiroosfa6543]

Well done. Here before 1000 views and 100 subscribers

[@besenwagenjager5140]

Thanks for this video, amazing compilation of launch-shots an technical information, but when I search in KZbin, there are many people, who argue, - that the earth is flat - and all the video-stuff is CGI. What are You going to tell them?

[@renecardoir7553]

Solid vid, was semi dissapointed tho. Came to learn how, like, the actual technology and techniques behind the tracking. Only really learned "this is why it is difficult for average Joe" and "they use fancy stuff, thats how." Nextime delve at least a little into the technical that makes their fancy stuff fancier. Mirrors? Radar? Electrophysics? Dat stuff.

[@krisraps]

The Original Musks Video On SpaceX Chanel Is ALTERED !!

[@SamiJumppanen]

Thank you! Interesting gear explained well! I may be able to fit one more sub somewhere here ;)

[@jeenyus720]

2:35 bruh they use an xbox controller

[@lightflix]

If you continue making these kinds of videos, you'll hit a million subs by the end of this year! Subscribed

[@shaunak9782]

Which is the strongest and most accurate cmamera on moon...answer is OHRC orbiter high resolution camera onboard the chandrayaan -2 moon orbiter

[@radiobikini6429]

Just a summary. No real technical information but still informative.

[@jmm1233]

Be nice if someone at ksp squad team made tracking cameras at the kerbals launch pads

[@yazgidemirbas7008]

thanks for feeding my brain.