How does Tank Armor and Ammunition work?

  Рет қаралды 1,883,464

Matsimus

Matsimus

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 1 200
@_Matsimus_
@_Matsimus_ 5 жыл бұрын
Wanna hang out for future live stream interactions, gaming and chats with me!! Come to Twitch and remember to follow! 🎮 Twitch: www.twitch.tv/matsimus_9033
@ronwhittaker6317
@ronwhittaker6317 5 жыл бұрын
Americans say this in not a war this is a stick up. fork it over.
@tintintonker1105
@tintintonker1105 4 жыл бұрын
does the T14 also have this heavily sloped layout?
@rinoradulovic5370
@rinoradulovic5370 3 жыл бұрын
3:49 MAUSCHEN?
@johnboscogatsimbanyi3852
@johnboscogatsimbanyi3852 3 жыл бұрын
What's the name and artist of the instrumental soundtrack in this video, please?
@mrcolddrink2763
@mrcolddrink2763 5 жыл бұрын
How does Tank Armor and Ammunition work? A10:They Don’t
@roceye
@roceye 5 жыл бұрын
A10's 30mm can't penetrate the frontal armor of any modern MBT that's why they attack armor from behind and obviously above.
@hansvonmannschaft9062
@hansvonmannschaft9062 5 жыл бұрын
@@roceye I knew it! There *had* to be some anti-A-10 mysoginist patriarchist pig out there that thinks that A-10's exist just to BRRRRT around things! Well, nope! They can also carry things below their wings! Things dangerous to AFB's! There! hah. Amazing, so disgusted to have read that comment...
@roceye
@roceye 5 жыл бұрын
@@hansvonmannschaft9062 lol- go take your meds and sit down
@TheGuyThatsNotFunny
@TheGuyThatsNotFunny 5 жыл бұрын
@@roceye don't, he's hans
@TheGuyThatsNotFunny
@TheGuyThatsNotFunny 5 жыл бұрын
@@hansvonmannschaft9062 why does everyone think the A-10 only brrrt, they has bombs and missile
@aaronseet2738
@aaronseet2738 5 жыл бұрын
Modern tank warfare: long range dart matches.
@NickariusSN
@NickariusSN 4 жыл бұрын
Practically they cant even penetrate each other from long range Edit: i am very sorry for my 1 year ago self's statements, he is an idiot
@thomasmacdonough288
@thomasmacdonough288 4 жыл бұрын
@@NickariusSN What? At this point in armored warfare any tank can punch through each other's armor at over 2000m. Practically they can penetrate each other from long range.
@weouthere6902
@weouthere6902 4 жыл бұрын
Some darts can liquidify the crew inside
@BearAnkles
@BearAnkles 4 жыл бұрын
@@weouthere6902 mmm goo
@weouthere6902
@weouthere6902 4 жыл бұрын
@@BearAnkles probably more like slush
@theScottishKoala
@theScottishKoala 6 жыл бұрын
4:05 Just to elaborate: the word "melt" was used more to paraphrase the act which actually happens, in which the copper lining does not actually melt, but ACTS as though it were a liquid (despite remaining below its melting point), due to the force that is being put upon it by the explosive charge, and the speed at which it deforms and penetrates the target material
@30LayersOfKevlar
@30LayersOfKevlar 6 жыл бұрын
Yes, but it's also not "cooling down" as you said at 7:09. Because it's not "superheated", it's in the state of superplasticity, due to pressure. Also I'm not sure where you got your info on ceramics in Chobham and Burlington.
@jonny2954
@jonny2954 6 жыл бұрын
As far as i remember spaced armor of low thickness can actually increase shaped charge penetration in the main armor by giving the shaped charge more standoff.
@drakko26
@drakko26 6 жыл бұрын
As far as I understood it, the jet actually displaces and forces itself between the armor molecules. That's why it's veeery important where it actually detonates vs. the armor facing it's supposed to penetrate (hence being readily defeated by a simple cage/spaced armor layout).
@jonny2954
@jonny2954 6 жыл бұрын
@@drakko26 Cage/slat and spaced armor don't work the same way. It's a common misconception that slat armor works by prematurely triggering the shaped charge warhead, because that would potentially even increase penetration in the main armor (as explained above). Slat armor works by sqashing/crushing the shaped charge warhead before it detonates. That's also why it isn't 100% safe, because if a warhead hits a bar head on, it's oof.
@fi4re
@fi4re 6 жыл бұрын
@@jonny2954 Thanks for explaining that! For the longest time, I've looked at the slats and thought "how could that possibly trigger a HEAT warhead? Wouldn't the tip of the warhead pass between the slats 95% of the time?"
@jasonstandlea1784
@jasonstandlea1784 6 жыл бұрын
As a man whose studied military science and technology for decades, and especially armored warfare, I actually LEARNED NEW THINGS watching this video. *claps* Bravo gentlemen. Bravo!
@exnbcnco
@exnbcnco 6 жыл бұрын
Are you gay?
@empire-classfirenationbatt2691
@empire-classfirenationbatt2691 5 жыл бұрын
Are you sure you studied well lol?
@RoboPutinPresidentinCE
@RoboPutinPresidentinCE 5 жыл бұрын
What die you learn?
@christopherhampton8364
@christopherhampton8364 4 жыл бұрын
In highly hostile environments, What material is best for thin armor? I’m not sure about the cons to consider with armoring metals
@mariolisa2832
@mariolisa2832 2 жыл бұрын
This is all basic stuff bro
@Masukutonkatsu
@Masukutonkatsu 5 жыл бұрын
Meanwhile in War Thunder: *RICOCHET*
@aiyaia_
@aiyaia_ 4 жыл бұрын
do you play wt?
@meerrb1
@meerrb1 4 жыл бұрын
I hate it when you calculate and ricochet bruh
@mlekoguy1119
@mlekoguy1119 3 жыл бұрын
Target undamaged
@cb235
@cb235 3 жыл бұрын
ENEMY KILL ASSIST
@Billy-bn1rp
@Billy-bn1rp 3 жыл бұрын
"Hull break"
@imperialstardestroyer712
@imperialstardestroyer712 4 жыл бұрын
"Tank armor stops shells" WoT premium ammo: no it doesn't
@eggman8053
@eggman8053 4 жыл бұрын
CZECH SLAV TF2 medic: no they don’t
@matteusgreyling7074
@matteusgreyling7074 4 жыл бұрын
Panzer tanks: aim I a joke to you
@ok88warrior
@ok88warrior 4 жыл бұрын
Is that game actually good?
@thegamingcat3202
@thegamingcat3202 4 жыл бұрын
ricky bear no, its shit
@marylanebergrok4971
@marylanebergrok4971 4 жыл бұрын
PLAY WAR THUNDER cuz wot is HOT STEAMING DOG SHIT
@Reynevan100
@Reynevan100 5 жыл бұрын
This video is probably the single most comprehensive and well-research all-in-one piece with detailed explanations of various types of tank armor and ammunition. Really well presented and easy to understand. Especially when you talked about the APSFDS shells and explained how NATO and Russian differ, but also most importantly - WHY it differs (blocky vs slope-y tanks!). Wish watching this was required before posting on WT reddit about ammunition - so many misconceptions clarified in under 30 minutes!
@theScottishKoala
@theScottishKoala 5 жыл бұрын
So glad you enjoyed and found it informative. The War Thunder reddit is pretty autistic to be honest, even the developers treat it as a meme these days, they're so sick of filtering through the stupidity
@deathdragon2283
@deathdragon2283 6 жыл бұрын
24:20 “a way of hacking into guided munitions” *shows an unguided RPG getting blown to bits*
@peterjones6945
@peterjones6945 5 жыл бұрын
NASA uses 'space(d) armour' on the International Space Station. Even a paint fleck at 17,000 mph has a lot of energy that needs dissipating ;o)
@cryptic3675
@cryptic3675 4 жыл бұрын
@robert proctor you make me think that *you* are the Idiot...
@CatAdvantage
@CatAdvantage 4 жыл бұрын
robert proctor you’re*
@lemonaid8678
@lemonaid8678 4 жыл бұрын
@@CatAdvantage he wasn’t sure what your, you’re to use😂🤣 so just spell it out.
@CatAdvantage
@CatAdvantage 4 жыл бұрын
@@lemonaid8678 I don’t remember the content but it looks like the guy I was talking to deleted his comment.
@zakiranderson722
@zakiranderson722 4 жыл бұрын
I came here to say this👍
@irishspitfire
@irishspitfire 6 жыл бұрын
This is the most entertaining tank education video I've ever seen. Bravo to both of you!
@CastilloDelDiablo
@CastilloDelDiablo 5 жыл бұрын
Many years ago I visited an old fortified house (16th century) in scotland and found it had cavity walls, when researching this I found it was to reduce the capabilities of cannon and shot.
@waltsears
@waltsears 4 жыл бұрын
Hey guys, Very informative video. I learned a lot. One point...shells don’t penetrate. Shells don’t go down range. Projectiles do. Shells stay in the tank once the round is fired. Just sayin’. Thanks for your work!
@thatoneanimator8574
@thatoneanimator8574 3 жыл бұрын
"man I'm always absent for online class" me at 1:25 AM:
@theScottishKoala
@theScottishKoala 6 жыл бұрын
Sees upload - gets excited
@theScottishKoala
@theScottishKoala 6 жыл бұрын
Appreciate it Mat, was a pleasure to be involved. Cheers! :D
@Bull_10RR
@Bull_10RR 6 жыл бұрын
i had to go like this video on both channels.. its THAT good... new sub for the both of you, hope to see more collabs in the future
@echozy1292
@echozy1292 6 жыл бұрын
Man I could talk about this topic for days. Its kinda fascinating in its own way
@danmurray1143
@danmurray1143 5 жыл бұрын
Fast-forward 1,000 years, our descendants will be studying such topics as the "pre-robotic militaristic times." When Mankind figured out that it's better to have machines do the fighting and dying. As a self-taught Military Historian, I'd argue it began in the mid-1910s. But, what's a few decades between friends?
@monetum1392
@monetum1392 4 жыл бұрын
@@danmurray1143 wut
@LetsSeeYourKungFu
@LetsSeeYourKungFu 5 жыл бұрын
Love learning awesome info. 7 years ago,World of Tanks made me an armor enthusiast. I really like the War Thunder clips simulating the narrative. Great job!
@ogog9816
@ogog9816 6 жыл бұрын
Could you do a similiar type of video talking about how the armor on tanks are repaired after they had been hit? It really interests me to know what they do to these tanks and how they do it. This video was very great :)
@LazySillyDog
@LazySillyDog 9 ай бұрын
That's a good question, I'm curious as well
@RuggedCoyote69
@RuggedCoyote69 6 жыл бұрын
Honestly, Republic Commando deserves a remaster
@jamesgornall5731
@jamesgornall5731 5 жыл бұрын
Oh baby does it ever.
@TexanTemplar
@TexanTemplar 5 жыл бұрын
Just got that game for my xbox one lol
@NA-ck6cz
@NA-ck6cz 4 жыл бұрын
Kote! Kandosii sa ka'rota, Vode An Coruscanta a'den mhi, Vode An Bal kote, darasuum kote Jorso'ran kando a tome Sa kyr'am nau tracyn kad, Vode an Kandosii sa ka'rota, Vode An Coruscanta a'den mhi, Vode An Bal... Motir ca'tra nau tracinya Gra'tua cuun hett su dralshy'a Aruetyc runi solus cet o'r Motir ca'tra nau tracinya Gra'tua cuun hett su dralshy'a Aruetyc runi'la trattok'o Sa kyr'am nau tracyn kad, Vode an
@theScottishKoala
@theScottishKoala 6 жыл бұрын
Holy hell the amount of views on this video! INSANITY! Looks like we need to do another one of these Mat! :D
@_Matsimus_
@_Matsimus_ 6 жыл бұрын
theScottishKoala roger that brother! 👍👍
@waynebyerly9681
@waynebyerly9681 6 жыл бұрын
If you do another video ... TURN THE MUSIC OFF!!!
@dwayne7201
@dwayne7201 5 жыл бұрын
yes
@MrBirdonawire
@MrBirdonawire 6 жыл бұрын
Awesome video guys. Extremely well done. Easy to understand and entertaining.
@woltews
@woltews 6 жыл бұрын
1- shaped charges dont melt the armor they punch through it with the velocity f the explosively formed penitratore at like mach 9 or more 2- spaced armor may not only cause premature detonation but also normalisation at angals that are poorly suited to penetrating the main armor 3- mono block long penitratores do not bend well 4- ceramic reinforced metal armor can also significantly increase he effectiveness of a given thickness of conventional armor
@MarcinP2
@MarcinP2 6 жыл бұрын
The armor flows under extreme pressure. Same way as when metal is cold forged, sheet formed, rolled or pulled. The whole "burn trough" or "melt trough" is a close enough metaphor for a layman.
@major_kukri2430
@major_kukri2430 6 жыл бұрын
TOP 10 ANIME CROSSOVERS THAT NO ONE COULD HAVE PREDICTED.
@Aintence
@Aintence 6 жыл бұрын
Wasnt the super pershing at 6:45 a one off modification during war? The crew cut up found panther and added its armour to help the tank.
@rcaygumicabk8072
@rcaygumicabk8072 3 жыл бұрын
That's actually what the super Pershing was pretty much it was a failed project that has only 2 total kills neither of which were king tigers
@billwilson3609
@billwilson3609 2 жыл бұрын
The Army wasn't interested in using the Super Pershing so Ordnance allowed Lt. Belton Cooper to add armor where he felt it needed more. Cooper complained during the war about the thin armor on US tanks so also grumbled the M26's. Cooper stacked layers on the hull glacis and added more to the front of the turret that added 5 tons of weight that made the tank nose heavy. Cooper was going to add more in the back to "balance" the tank but was told to stop since the engineers feared additional weight would ruin the transmission. It crawled off to the front where it hit 2 targets 1500 meters away that resembled tanks before being knocked out by a Panzer 4 that put a shot thru the side of the hull. The tank was last seen at a salvage yard waiting to be cut up for scrap.
@DeetexSeraphine
@DeetexSeraphine 5 жыл бұрын
Nice video guys, I love the levity and banter, and enjoyed it's informative values!
@purplemonkey4442
@purplemonkey4442 6 жыл бұрын
one thing ive always wondered when it comes to spaced armour, in a case with small arms fire would compressed gas or liquid create a more effective armour before its penetrated and rendering it less effective
@ph11p3540
@ph11p3540 6 жыл бұрын
Glad to listen to ScottishKoala. Hope your friendship is long lasting.
@dansanders173
@dansanders173 6 жыл бұрын
Really great video! Great to know this too! Thanks Matt!
@ok88warrior
@ok88warrior 4 жыл бұрын
I'll keep this Info in mind when I'm fitting my lawn mower for the apocalypse
@whya2ndaccount
@whya2ndaccount 6 жыл бұрын
Part of the difference between Soviet and NATO ammunition is due to the single piece NATO ammo (except the CR2) and its ability to include a longer penetrator. Soviet / Russian, two piece ammunition (required for their auto-loader systems), can't include that due to the projectile's size. Also NATO ammunition is more resource intensive as NATO can afford the resource / machining allocation.
@lyleslaton3086
@lyleslaton3086 4 жыл бұрын
Very good video, thanks for increasing my tank neardyness.
@sxleong
@sxleong 6 жыл бұрын
I read somewhere that Chobham Research had found out that their Burlington/Dorchester Ceramic-Composite Armour works best when hit perpendicularly rather than at an angle by a KE penetrator.
@danmurray1143
@danmurray1143 5 жыл бұрын
I have no idea of what you just said, yet I completely agree with it.
@kevinmclean4820
@kevinmclean4820 2 жыл бұрын
1.1 million views!! Congratulations Matt! Keep up the awesome work, we love ya 🇨🇦
@Je3perscre3pers
@Je3perscre3pers 5 жыл бұрын
8:15 When I was on the Syrian/ Iraqi border ive seen EFPs cut clean through Abrams armor (when they didnt have explosive reactive armor plating on) but ive seen bullet proof glass stop an EFP. When the humvee came back the driver side window was smoking on the outside but the inside the driver was okay. The inner glass was cracked from the heat but no penetration.
@Verradonairun
@Verradonairun 2 жыл бұрын
Very interesting. Are you sure that the failure of the EFP can't be attributed to the Humvee being slightly out of range?
@mrgreyman3358
@mrgreyman3358 Жыл бұрын
Ex tankie here. appreciate your videos on tanks, they are fun to watch. shells are freaking heavy and you throw your back out regularly as a loader, which is why auto load has been a back saver for many a man. Whilst fun as hell to drive, being a tankie is a hot, smelly, dirty unenjoyable job for the majority of the time.
@minisaur6814
@minisaur6814 6 жыл бұрын
Very good video! Very detailed but easy to understand :) Im pretty sure the people who has just found armoured fighting vehicles interesting will get most of it. Looking forward to the next one.. as always :D
@danmurray1143
@danmurray1143 5 жыл бұрын
Yes, armored fighting vehicles are interesting, until you have to crawl in a corner of one of them and attempt to get a few hours of sleep on a rainy night, with metal objects trying to penetrate you like a rogue GrindR date as you toss & turn. LOL, thanks for your interest in mechanized warfare. Peace, Love, and all that good stuff, Lieutenant, Dan.
@ItalianRain2
@ItalianRain2 6 жыл бұрын
I was looking forward to the HE shell explanation/evolution..
@alexlucas9535
@alexlucas9535 6 жыл бұрын
I vote for Matsimii.
@PUBHEAD1
@PUBHEAD1 6 жыл бұрын
I like the team work putting video together. Great job gentleman
@PytonPagom
@PytonPagom 6 жыл бұрын
Wonderful co-work here, looking forward for some more of this Matt ! Also, what i remember from Alkonafter´s side on this topic, he greatly expressed the limitation of the soviet school auto-loader, as the round cant exceed a certain length, in witch hand-loaded guns have a big advantage, having a great impact on soviet munitions potential especially in modernization terms and into the future. P.S.: What was that at 11:19 ? I want some more of that ... from both of you ! :D :D
@flinchfu
@flinchfu 3 жыл бұрын
Just that partial penetration in the thumb would ruin the crew's day. All of those blazing hot armor chucks in front of that shell had a hayday in that tank.
@perdaboy
@perdaboy 5 жыл бұрын
I'll keep this in mind next time I'm buying my tank shells.
@MihzvolWuriar
@MihzvolWuriar 6 жыл бұрын
Sharing this video with my tank aficionado friends, this is definitely the best video about tank armor out there, thanks for that
@bradleyanderson4315
@bradleyanderson4315 6 жыл бұрын
Then there is steel foam armor which acts sort of as a cross between rolled homogenous armor and spaced armor. It is three times as thick for the same weight and is particularly effective against heat and hesh while having at least as much effectiveness against apds as the same weight of rha. Very effective against mines when used as belly armor on vehicles.
@ianian8022
@ianian8022 6 жыл бұрын
this is gonna be bloody good, I can tell......
@Limescale12
@Limescale12 6 жыл бұрын
YEAH! love that opening - ah the slow motion glory
@tilendobnikar
@tilendobnikar 5 жыл бұрын
name of the song?
@chrisspencer6502
@chrisspencer6502 6 жыл бұрын
Strange question, what happens to spent shells are they retained where ever possible to be reused? Or just discarded? Does the army care about spent brass?
@p51mustang24
@p51mustang24 6 жыл бұрын
tossed most likely. Perhaps they sweep the firing ranges and pick it up for recycling. Doubt they reload.
@Bert2368
@Bert2368 6 жыл бұрын
@@Drikkerbadevand Yup. The US military does auction or sell lots of empty 1X fired small arms brass and other such materials. Look online. Also, the USA Dept. of Defense sells surplus or past use by date complete rounds of small arms ammo. The US buyers are not allowed to resell this inside USA as the functional ammunition it was received as, but there is a thriving business in taking down the ammunition to components and selling these components (brass cases, projectiles, propellants) in bulk to reloaders or smaller ammunition manufacturers. At one point durimg the Obama administration, the administration ordered DOD to render the fired military small arms cartridge cases sold inside USA at auction UNUSEABLE for reloading and fit only for sale as recycled scrap brass by crushing them under armored vehicle treads or similar means. HUGE publicity problem as they moved towards driving numerous small businesses dependant on that brass supply into bankruptcy, plus conspiracy theorists screaming.
@somedude3448
@somedude3448 6 жыл бұрын
The spaced armor on the leo2a5 and up looks to actually be NERA. A close look shows what looks to be a rubber layer and another steel plate on the inside before the hollow space begins
@cat_clan_leader
@cat_clan_leader 5 жыл бұрын
Pz IV - [Upgrade] Tiger I - [Go back] Tiger II - [I said go back] Maus - [I SAID GO BACK!]
@heavylifter315
@heavylifter315 6 жыл бұрын
Brilliant video. I actually learned something and I'm huge tank nerd.
@wntu4
@wntu4 5 жыл бұрын
Maraging steels (a portmanteau of "martensitic" and "aging") are steels (iron alloys) that are known for possessing superior strength and toughness without losing malleability, although they cannot hold a good cutting edge. Aging refers to the extended heat-treatment process.
@Chaps_Jr
@Chaps_Jr 6 жыл бұрын
I'm a bit late to this video, but I'd like to add an inconsequential bit of info. I was a nuclear Machinist Mate in the US Navy, so I had to learn every imaginable aspect of Uranium and its isotopes-- even on the theoretical quantum level. Uranium (U-92) is actually the most dense naturally-occurring metal that we can produce in significant quantities. It has a very unique atomic structure, unlike other metals. When most metals experience a large force (such as a bullet impacting armor), they deform into a mushroom shape as the material is pushed out of the way from the point of impact. However, when Uranium experiences the same force, it acts very differently. It tends to have a "sharpening" behavior, where the material that has expended its energy begins to chip away, allowing the remaining Uranium to continue on its path relatively unhindered. This helps the depleted Uranium penetrators retain their penetrative ability more efficiently, compared to more traditional steel or Tungsten penetrators. This, coupled with the extreme density of the metal, is what makes DU APFS-DS rounds so potent.
@qbenalzaeen2052
@qbenalzaeen2052 6 жыл бұрын
Another quality of DU is that it is pyrophoric ie. it ignitesspontaneously in air at low temperature
@98integraGSR
@98integraGSR 6 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣 way to try to create a false equivalency, Seaman Shmuckatelli. I WENT to NNPTC. That school is a JOKE. It's nothing more than a minimum competency course to appease the DOE... and guess what? Ballistics ISN'T part of the curriculum. You want to brag about completing Prototype? Cool beans, nobody is stopping you... But going around KZbin trying to portray yourself as an expert in completely unrelated fields because you completed a fundamentally flawed community college Associate's-level crash course on BASIC chemistry and physics? That just makes you look like a pompous ass. The physics model you were taught? It doesn't even include reaction forces.
@Chaps_Jr
@Chaps_Jr 6 жыл бұрын
@@awashburn6944 I mean all you need to earn a degree or certificate at a state university is the minimum requirements. My point is, minimum competency is a flawed logic as an insult because it can be applied to nearly everything. How many times do we see complete idiots earning the same rewards as their hard-working counterparts?
@Chaps_Jr
@Chaps_Jr 6 жыл бұрын
@@awashburn6944 That's exactly my point. He claimed NNPTC is trash because it's "minimum competency", but that really means nothing. Entrance is based on intelligence levels rather than GPA, and the instructors all have many years of practical experience in the field. Also, I never claimed to be a nuclear physicist or engineer-- only that I have knowledge of Uranium isotopes. No idea what that guy's problem is, but he seems to have some things he needs to work out with himself.
@cuisinierMB
@cuisinierMB 6 жыл бұрын
AWESOME!!!! Thx, it was really interesting and even funny!!! So, at Koala (you got a Abo since a while) and at Matsimus (You get it now), keep on and it would be interesting, to see more of your collaboration! Even from you both alone! Well, THX a lot!!! :)
@lukekelly9070
@lukekelly9070 4 жыл бұрын
I can’t be the only one who thought of the “silver bullet”
@allgood6760
@allgood6760 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks... I never thought about that with sloped armour... a round has to go a bit further to penetrate 👍
@jankukura6744
@jankukura6744 6 жыл бұрын
If I am not mistaken,the thumbnail id from Museum In czech rebublic in Lešany...i was there and tey had a thick "plate" with the shell in it
@Kramerthetroll
@Kramerthetroll 6 жыл бұрын
Brilliant! Thanks for pointing out his channel! Cheers!
@CraftyCohorts
@CraftyCohorts 4 жыл бұрын
Amazing machines!! Feel like these are becoming obsolete, think they would have a version that's half or quarter the size since there is so much urban wars nowadays
@laurensvandenhoven2805
@laurensvandenhoven2805 6 жыл бұрын
Love the vid. Great work !
@typicalperson8206
@typicalperson8206 6 жыл бұрын
4:03 that was so satisfying to watch
@Lebensgott
@Lebensgott 6 жыл бұрын
its from the video from the slow mo guys... i think it is called "massive explosive chain reaction" or something like that
@jakenshake7998
@jakenshake7998 6 жыл бұрын
Optimist: glass is half full Pessimist: glass is half empty M4 Sherman Commander: *_That one bounced!_*
@thomasborgsmidt9801
@thomasborgsmidt9801 6 жыл бұрын
Well don't underestimate the budget brutes. Denmark has just gathered money for update of 8 more Leopard 2's. Typical end of year budget cleaning. There are situations, where 8 such tanks can be mighty handy.
@thomasborgsmidt9801
@thomasborgsmidt9801 6 жыл бұрын
Actually - and that is a technicality: When you don't spend all the money in a fiscal year - you can carry it over to next year. Only problem is: It tends to become a personal slush fund for generals - gets their mistresses promoted really fast too. So... there was a Chief of the Army that got himself an early retirement. What some don't really get is: A budget is supposed to be spend doing the job. If you do it better - well there might be room for expanding a programme, that was cut a bit to thin to pass the review process. So if you are smart as a commander you allways have a wishlist (It is Christmas - after all) - of sensible investments that make economic and operational sense. The airforce had 3 Challengers for North Atlantic Patrol - and VIP transport. So when they smashed an engine and the delivery time was somewhere in the distant future - VERY distant. The mechanics went on the internet and found a repossed Challenger in a remote place. The price for the engine was actually the same as for the whole aeroplan - VERY posh interior. So one of our navy ships picked the plane up - and the technicians got to overhaul it. So now there is actually 4 Challengers - and they avoid the cost of pulling the VIP interior in and out for the PM. And the PM has an Air Force 0.1 and the crews can absolve their training and do something usefull - plus it saves airline tickets.
@pbr-streetgang
@pbr-streetgang 6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the vid. Like the mix up! Will check out Scott’s channel.
@qileyang1476
@qileyang1476 6 жыл бұрын
Yay! Finally another Matsimus vid! Can you please do a video about the chinese mbt ZTZ99A2? Thank youu!
@julianceballos8795
@julianceballos8795 5 жыл бұрын
Very informative. Thank you for your time and work.
@markfryer9880
@markfryer9880 6 жыл бұрын
On the subject of trigonometry as it relates to the penetrative capability of a round hitting the armour it is worth considering that the targeted tank is not always sitting in a level plane as witnessed by the game play video and the tanks out on the firing range. A tank as it is moving over terrain will pitch and roll in the positive and negative aspects often in combinations of both which will influence the force vectors being applied to the armour by any penetrators. What this all means is that while a theoretical presentation of a round hitting a target tank as it is presented when sitting on a horizontal surface, when it comes to hitting the real tank out on the real uneven ground of a battlefield just what the result will be is open to the variables of just how that tank is presented as a target and just where your round hits the tank.
@danmurray1143
@danmurray1143 5 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure if you are an Engineer, a Software nerd, or a Veteran. But you write immaculately. In any and all cases, well done.
@jackbanton1226
@jackbanton1226 5 жыл бұрын
Thanks guys, that was great and really informative!
@blackdeath4eternity
@blackdeath4eternity 6 жыл бұрын
don't mind me i'm just sitting here thinking about how a few wwII time travelers would love to have their hands on this video to bring it back to their own time....
@danmurray1143
@danmurray1143 5 жыл бұрын
blackdeath, I accidentally time traveled from the year 200000019 back to what you call "now." Can't believe our species survived the Obama Administration... funny and you all know it!. Yes, believe it or not, it was Trump who saved humanity. lol, ok, just funning with you guys. But, admit it, that was kinda funny, right?
@noided4230
@noided4230 3 жыл бұрын
@@danmurray1143 cheers Dan the man
@LeRoacher
@LeRoacher 6 жыл бұрын
Love the vid, keep up the good contents Mat
@xYottabyte
@xYottabyte 5 жыл бұрын
13:38 when you fire on a Tiger and it didn't penetrate.
@johnekare8376
@johnekare8376 2 жыл бұрын
1:32 Is that hip-thrust part of normal procedure when loading a round?
@cocopud
@cocopud 6 жыл бұрын
We just need to equip all tanks with PlOt ArmOuR, then they will be invincible 😜
@SteveBrownRocks2023
@SteveBrownRocks2023 Жыл бұрын
Very good info in this video! 👏🏼😎
@jamesc.5734
@jamesc.5734 6 жыл бұрын
interesting info BUT If I'm ever caught on the wrong end of a firing tank, I hope the shells are as far over my head as your explanation of tank ammunition. ;o)
@theenzoferrari458
@theenzoferrari458 5 жыл бұрын
If you are just call a A10 Warthog. It's your best friend and warthogs go Kyle angry when they see tank and smash it like drywall.
@davidodonovan1699
@davidodonovan1699 6 жыл бұрын
German WW1/WW2 21cm mortor... ...fired from a very big, self-propelled gun platform... ...because you sometimes just need to be sure that the tank is dead (if you can hit it, modern computer controlled aiming) first time. (water cool the gun barrel and have robots reload and blast fresh air threw the barrel for cooling, keeping the crew completely appart from the guns toxic gasses, if you want to have any hope of a decent rate of fire. I'm not an expert. I'm just a guy in the comment section that thinks that this would be a really cool idea.) God bless and Merry Christmas. Keep up the great context guys. Well done. :)
@davidodonovan1699
@davidodonovan1699 6 жыл бұрын
If shell had a rocket-booster that fired once the shell started off on its downward trajectory, to give it a some extra speed, and a split-second, delayed fuse, that would be good too.
@davidodonovan1699
@davidodonovan1699 6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the like Maximus. :) Your awesome. :) Merry Christmas. :)
@andrewlee-do3rf
@andrewlee-do3rf 6 жыл бұрын
4:12 "As these chemical warheads don'r rely on kinetic energy....." me: LIES!!!!! LIES!!!!! LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLIEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!! *RRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!* lol ;D
@DefinitelyNotAnAddict
@DefinitelyNotAnAddict 4 жыл бұрын
Lmfao
@MrSquiggl3s
@MrSquiggl3s 6 жыл бұрын
Very informative video. Keep up the good work.
@andrewgillis3073
@andrewgillis3073 6 жыл бұрын
Something that I've never seen mentioned on You tube is the fact that the Sabot petals can be extremely deadly to friendly troops in front of the tank. OUCH!
@DavidFMayerPhD
@DavidFMayerPhD 6 жыл бұрын
Hell, yes!
@armyreservist0
@armyreservist0 6 жыл бұрын
Not really an issue as tanks would drive ahead of their troops when engaging the enemy. Else they would be firing through their own troops 🤪🤪
@DavidFMayerPhD
@DavidFMayerPhD 6 жыл бұрын
@@armyreservist0 They tend to move together, with troops on the watch for anti-tank weapons while tank fires machine-guns over their heads. Troops look around and behind obstacles that may conceal enemies with missile launchers.
@MrWizardjr9
@MrWizardjr9 6 жыл бұрын
@@armyreservist0 depends on the country. some country's doctrines have the troops scout in front of the tank
@XtreeM_FaiL
@XtreeM_FaiL 5 жыл бұрын
Andrew Gillis The muzzle blast itself is a reason not to stand front of a gun.
@dwmaddawgs
@dwmaddawgs 5 жыл бұрын
Lots of good information for my tank build thanks
@thedinochromecommand
@thedinochromecommand 6 жыл бұрын
Yeah tanks are fun, until its time for maintenance. Sooooo much maintenance. Btw congrats on joining the rca. Its my uncles old regiment. I was a strat myself.
@thedinochromecommand
@thedinochromecommand 6 жыл бұрын
@@HanSolo__ you sound like you might be in procurement lmao!!!!
@danmurray1143
@danmurray1143 5 жыл бұрын
In my time with the tankers, as a field artillery officer, they spent 90% of their time working on those iron chariots... Mid to late 1990s anyway. Sincerely, thank you for your service my brother-in-arms. [Assumes the ridged position of attention and salutes].
@willandrews9741
@willandrews9741 5 жыл бұрын
Can you shoot explosive reactive armor with small arms and cause it to go off? Then just shoot it with a tank shell? Or would it require a really significant strike to make the e.r.a. go off?
@brumby92
@brumby92 6 жыл бұрын
How have you not done this video yet!?
@molaroismorais1955
@molaroismorais1955 3 жыл бұрын
Great video, guys keep bringing it ...
@offtemp5733
@offtemp5733 6 жыл бұрын
He didn’t say Mission Failed We’ll Get Em Next Time :(
@_Matsimus_
@_Matsimus_ 6 жыл бұрын
Bacon Dom lol
@mantia39
@mantia39 2 жыл бұрын
WOW....Lotta information coming at you here!
@phoboskittym8500
@phoboskittym8500 6 жыл бұрын
A new technology called electric reactive armour (also termed electromagnetic reactive armour, or colloquially as electric armour) is in development. This armour is made up of two or more conductive plates separated by an air gap or by an insulating material, creating a high-power capacitor.[5][6][7][8][9] In operation, a high-voltage power source charges the armour. When an incoming body penetrates the plates, it closes the circuit to discharge the capacitor, dumping a great deal of energy into the penetrator, which may vaporize it or even turn it into a plasma, significantly diffusing the attack. It is not public knowledge whether this is supposed to function against both kinetic energy penetrators and shaped charge jets, or only the latter. This technology has not yet been introduced on any known operational platform. Another electromagnetic alternative to ERA uses layers of plates of electromagnetic metal with silicone spacers on alternate sides. The damage to the exterior of the armour passes electricity into the plates causing them to magnetically move together. As the process is completed at the speed of electricity the plates are moving when struck by the projectile causing the projectile energy to be deflected whilst the energy is also dissipated in parting the magnetically attracted plates.
@danmurray1143
@danmurray1143 5 жыл бұрын
Damned. In my day, we just tried to squeeze off a nice shot at heads poking up a distance with M16s. You younger warriors have really thought things through! But seriously, thank you for your service. Continue to be the total bad-ass I suspect you are.
@T.H.E.O.2024
@T.H.E.O.2024 5 жыл бұрын
First of your videos I've seen,.. i insta subbed due to the quality of presentation and the amount of information,..
@essexclass8168
@essexclass8168 6 жыл бұрын
TL:DR: Everything's a shopping cart to an atgm
@DeepSpaceIndustriesLOL
@DeepSpaceIndustriesLOL 2 жыл бұрын
What about putting highly compressed air between armor so when it penetrates the air will be forced out and ontop of it
@02091992able
@02091992able 6 жыл бұрын
I thought the thing was with the M1 was that the tank originally had the 105mm gun but by the time the Gulf War came around they had already refitted a good deal of them with the M256 120mm gun which is still used on it today.
@pandabuttonftw745
@pandabuttonftw745 6 жыл бұрын
isn't this identical to the video on TSKs channel?
@Ross665
@Ross665 6 жыл бұрын
I think it is. But nothing wrong with watching it again, right?
@xjboy550
@xjboy550 6 жыл бұрын
Excellent Video guys look forward to more in this line
@hellboy6507
@hellboy6507 6 жыл бұрын
You should talk about NERA (non explosive reactive armor)
@jonny2954
@jonny2954 6 жыл бұрын
That would be NxRA. NERA is non energetic reactive armor.
@AverageJoe8686
@AverageJoe8686 6 жыл бұрын
@@jonny2954 'Energetic' by definition is 'Explosive' when talking about armor. NERA is just a special HDPE-RHA sandwich.
@jonny2954
@jonny2954 6 жыл бұрын
@@AverageJoe8686 NERA and NxRA work differently.
@AverageJoe8686
@AverageJoe8686 6 жыл бұрын
@@jonny2954 They don't work differently according to the Patent. NxRA is just NERA with a special filler instead of plain rubber. But they are basically the same thing. C. Non-Explosive Reactive Armor (NxRA): [0011] Non-Explosive Reactive Armor provides a comparable efficiency to SLERA, comparable survivability to NERA (see below), and excellent multiple-hit capability against hollow charge warheads. NxRA's advantages over other reactive armor technologies are that it is totally passive and has substantially better efficiency than NERA.Energetic materials for NxRA are disclosed for example in [bla bla bla]. D. Non-Energetic Reactive Armor (NERA): [0012] Non-Energetic Reactive Armor has limited efficiency against hollow charges. NERA's advantage is that it is totally passive and thus provides excellent survivability and maximal multiple-hit capability, comparable to NxRA. [0013] It is an object of the present invention to provide a non-explosive energetic material suitable for NxRA which does not contain explosive material and fulfills its protective function (high efficiency and high survivability of the armor), whilst the non-explosive energetic material lowers the requirements of transportation and logistics according to various standards e.g. UN regulations as appearing in the Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods. [0014] It is a further object of the present invention to provide an armor element fitted for such an energetic material and where the armor is of comparable efficiency to SLERA and of comparable survivability to NERA.
@jonny2954
@jonny2954 6 жыл бұрын
@@AverageJoe8686 The part you cited literally says nothing about how the armors work respectively. Yes, NxRA has a different filler, and this filler is changing how the armor behaves when hit, meaning how it works. In NERA, you have layers which 'transfer' energy from front plate to backplate -and this backplate is moving and damaging the SC jet or penetrator rod. In NERA armour this layer is passive, not active - it only transfer energy between metal layers. In NxRA, you have layers which are non explosive but reactive. This layer changes its volume during transfer of energy from first to second metal layer of the array -so BOTH thin metal plates start to move and both metal plates are damaging the SC jet or penetrator. The movement is much faster in NxRA.
@aaronseet2738
@aaronseet2738 6 жыл бұрын
Why does the Abrams have their sprocket wheel unguarded? Wouldn't it be better for side armour to also cover it (at least partially like the other wheels) ?
@spearton-1912
@spearton-1912 6 жыл бұрын
11:36 putting all the ammo in the front with no additional protection great job Germany
@cc-bk3tx
@cc-bk3tx 6 жыл бұрын
Explains how they lost two world wars :P
@spearton-1912
@spearton-1912 6 жыл бұрын
@@komradearti9935 #1) lower plate #2) high pen ammunition
@Mrgamer7281
@Mrgamer7281 4 жыл бұрын
4:02 is a clip from The Slo Mo Guys on KZbin if people are interested. They experiment with det cord in that vid.
@CZ350tuner
@CZ350tuner 6 жыл бұрын
In 1917 the British Royal Armouries tested captured German anti-tank weapons and ammunition versus the Harveyised rolled steel armour being used on the British and French tanks in WW1. Harveyised armour (1865) was a process of burying red hot steel plates in carbon granules and leaving it to cool over a long period of time, which allowed the carbon to be absorbed into the surfaces of the steel plates and increasing the hardness. On the downside it is very prone to spalling. It also cannot be drilled or punched so all holes have to be created before the process takes place. In 1921, when rolled and cast homogenous armour first appeared, they revisited these weapons again in tests for a comparison and measure of improvements in this armour protection advancement. (Vertical test targets at 100 yards range). Harveyised plate Rolled Homogenous plate Mauser 7.92mm. rifle AP K bullet: Up to 19mm. Up to 13mm. Mauser 13mm. anti-tank rifle AP bullet: Up to 30mm. Up to 21mm.
@brendanngin9939
@brendanngin9939 6 жыл бұрын
Andy Reid I don’t get it
@markfryer9880
@markfryer9880 6 жыл бұрын
vVv shaggy Neither do I. The information was very interesting but I didn't understand the presentation of the results. I also found the information to be very helpful as I am interested in welding and blacksmithing.
@CZ350tuner
@CZ350tuner 6 жыл бұрын
@@brendanngin9939 I was demonstrating that a change in the technology of the AFV armour material has already confronted anti-armour weapons developers in the 1920's with the invention of very high nickel content rolled homogeneous armour. RHA gives more protection for the same thickness as WW1 era Harveyised armour (invented 1871). Modern day armour materials give considerable increases in protection compared to WW2 FHRHA. Progress is measured against what preceded an improvement.
@hintixmotivation5852
@hintixmotivation5852 5 жыл бұрын
That face appearing on the top right hand corner after the explosion is too funny
@jorge8596
@jorge8596 6 жыл бұрын
"Longer rods penetrate more armor" Hehe
@danielpeirson3071
@danielpeirson3071 3 жыл бұрын
Great colab guys.
Knock Out: The Evolution of Tank Ammunition
19:29
The Tank Museum
Рет қаралды 630 М.
How Strong Is Tape?
00:24
Stokes Twins
Рет қаралды 96 МЛН
Tuna 🍣 ​⁠@patrickzeinali ​⁠@ChefRush
00:48
albert_cancook
Рет қаралды 148 МЛН
HYDRAULIC PRESS VS ARMOR, USA AND RUSSIA
10:16
Crazy Hydraulic Press
Рет қаралды 2,1 МЛН
When a B-17 Tail Fell With a Gunner Inside
14:08
Yarnhub
Рет қаралды 4,8 МЛН
What Tank Armour Can (& Can't) Do | Evolution of Armour
24:01
The Tank Museum
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
Why Protecting Tanks is Getting Much More Difficult
12:36
Not What You Think
Рет қаралды 15 МЛН
TANK vs GUN SAFES!!!
11:12
DemolitionRanch
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН
The Insane Engineering of the Javelin
15:12
Real Engineering
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Tanks Size Comparison
5:36
Gravity
Рет қаралды 1,7 МЛН