How does the new LiteVNA64 compare to the NanoVNA?

Get yours from a trusted source like R and L Electronics: store2.rlham.com/shop/catalog...
Click the 👍 Like Button, 🤡 Leave a Comment, ❤️ Subscribe
👉 Support The Channel 👈
❤️ Patreon: / temporarilyoffline
📺 KZbin Memberships: kzbin.info...
💸 Tip Jar: paypal.me/temporarilyoffline
👕 Merch: shop.spreadshirt.com/temporar...
🧰 Gear I Use: kit.co/TemporarilyOffline
🛒 Amazon Link: www.amazon.com/shop/temporari...
📻 $15 off at Radioddity: radioddity.refr.cc/temporarily...
👉 Fun Stuff 👈
👉 TOADs Discord: / discord
🕊️ Twitter: / kilomike9golf
😸 Github: github.com/TemporarilyOffline
Where possible, all links are affiliate links, this youtube thing is an expensive endeavor and every little bit helps.

[@stevethibodeauxn4sfc257]

Nice review Steve. Thanks for the info.

[@vaunsphotography6820]

Nice that it's got a larger screen and better test leads. I might order one in the future.

[@ke4est]

Nice review Steve. Would like to see more testing with it, especially in the higher ranges.

[@ParedCheese]

Small calibration point: "open" isn't the same as "no load" when calibrating. The "open" load calibrates for the connector which the "short" and "50Ω" loads also have.

[@DonzLockz]

Bigger screens are better for OM's. :)

[@DonDegidio]

Hi Steve,

[@briandonaldson612stringgui8]

With a lot of comments, I am sure it was mentioned, but for accuracy one would calibrate after each frequency change. However, I do the same as you when just looking to get a general feel of what my antenna(s) are doing. I might go for the LiteVNA64. Thanks es 73 KF6BL

[@PowderMill]

Very nice video. I only use my NanoVNA as a simple antenna (really only VHF/UHF/700.800) analyzer and duplexer/filter quick checking device. The larger screen of the LiteVNA makes it a worthwhile purchase for me. You can never have enough gadgets in your toolbox. Thanks!

[@brentjohnson6654]

Good review, Steve. I am enjoying the cooler weather in northern Minnesota visiting family at our cabin. Next week is back to Texas. This looks a lot like the H4 I purchased from R&L. Does this product have a PC application like nanoVNA saver?

[@marcindyba4774]

Thank you.

[@ssaa66oo]

Hey, thanks for the reivew! I have a similar LiteVNA at home but it i almost unusable as there are huge fluctuations when measuring. I noticed the same kind of unstability shows on your screen. do you have any idea how that can be reduced?

[@ozone385]

Can you use this with the computer like the smaller one? Great video. Thanks, N9TDE

[@LB0FI]

Is the screen just bigger, or is it brighter as well?

[@Inkling777]

My aging eyes would like the larger screen. Here are some specs from the link: Frequency stability <0.5ppm. Sweep rate >550 points/s Avg=1. Sweep points (on device) 10 ~ 1001 points, adjustable. Sweep points (USB) 1 ~ 1024 points, adjustable -

[@kubectlgetpo]

How is nothing on the same as open? I thought you need the open sma calibration because it takes into account the tiny air gap.

[@alklapaxida850]

i need a fooskotira for that vna

[@barrybogart5436]

But is it worth upgrading? I don't need any more freq coverage!

[@kubectlgetpo]

The calibration did not take into account the pigtail you connected so the calibration plane is wrong.

[@Tjita1]

In fairness, the NanoVNA is available in the same two screen sizes as the LiteVNA.

[@Mr_ASIC]

LiteVNA64 or Nanovna-F V3