More Harry Potter Documentaries! kzbin.info/aero/PLB5djWCQq2_e0UCOmVbhRP8HkxetpzXUV
@WolverineMRD6 ай бұрын
I know this isn't related to this video but I have a question if you don't mind. We all know that the Quill Of Acceptance and The Book Of Admittance are responsible for registering students into hogwarts, in Tom Riddle's case (an orphan) his mother gave birth to him in the orphanage and gave him a name which was known to the people who worked there (Tom Marvolo Riddle), but what if we were talking about an orphan who's origins are not really known? An orphan given a name at the orphanage but no surname, will the Quill or the Book be able to figure out the surname? What would be even written in the book? Will the Quill or the Book be able to know the origins of this orphan? Their true family or lineage? What would happen in this case? Please answer me, I'm really dying to know, and if you don't have an answer based on the lore just tell me what you think would happen, I would love to hear your opinions and thank you in advance for your answers, personally I think that the Quill will be able to know what the orphan's surname is or to which family they belong. What do you think?
@OrdinaryMan1999-tn4hhАй бұрын
To me the "Cop-out" theory is likely the most plausible all things considered. Voldemort used his full abilities with the Elder Wand and even he with all of his cunning and understanding he did not know for certain if he was it's true master. Grindlewald will likely not realize that flaw in the Wand's power until after his defeat at the hands of Dumbledore.
@kaywire60996 ай бұрын
I don’t get why they didn’t just make fantastic beasts a standalone movie and then make a dumbledore trilogy so you can focus on that story without it being bogged down by unnecessary characters and plot lines.
@Weathernerd276 ай бұрын
The real problem with fantastic beasts is poor plot/lack of character development. They didn't take the time to write a good script, they just used the small pieces of information in the Deathly Hallows book added a bunch of special effects and hoped the Harry Potter reputation would carry it. I liked the Harry Potter series alot but Fantastic Beasts bored me so I didn't bother to see the whole series. You can make one movie based on special effects but for a series you need a good story.
@piusdoe89846 ай бұрын
There is no one way this should have been done. Anything works with great writing and great writing is not easy.
@rickywebb18036 ай бұрын
Me and my gf say this all the time like fantastic beasts could be a trilogy maybe for people who just want to see cute little creatures or even for people who aren’t major fans And the Dumbledore movies could be for the bigger Harry Potter fans with a lot more action scenes
Love the video man. Your really good at finding things in this story to tear apart and pick out the most minuet details and making the fantastic theories.
@BenjaminKeenan-y3u6 ай бұрын
I like how you gave a classification system of 0 to 100 for Grindelwald, Dumbledore, and Voldemort. I am extremely interested in hearing a video on your taking this line of thinking further. What would Severus Snape score? Since he was creating spells, and was an extremely talented wizard. Minerva McGonnagal? Mad Eye Moody? Bellatrix Lestrange? Etc. hope to see this in the near future! Thank you for your continued content!
@Dragondan19876 ай бұрын
I’m from the category he pulled a good old Godrick Griffindor move, and mid duel just threw a punch, kick, or a good old English headbutt (which could explain albus’ broken nose, because that is a risky move at the best of times) and it was such a muggle move old grindy just got thrown off his game completely and lost.
@megaham15526 ай бұрын
That would work tbf
@jp_eight36 ай бұрын
Albus had his nose broken by Aberforth at Ariana’s funeral.
@katiebugg70186 ай бұрын
I love this idea so much. I’m not even gonna point out. We already know how we got the broken nose. OK fine I did. I’m just that much of a nerd though.😂 nothing wrong with a little Muggle dueling. That’s what I was most upset to see didn’t get put in the movies Harry, and one of the twins, jumping Draco, Mr. Weasley and Mr. Malfoy, fighting in the bookstore ,Neville Trying to attack Draco, kreture bashing dung over the head to make him talk😂
@electricheartpony6 ай бұрын
Johnny Depp's grindelwald is best
@le_Malicieux6 ай бұрын
That's True but Mads Mikkelsen is not bad 👌
@Mr.NorwegianMarcus6 ай бұрын
@@le_Malicieux 100%, Mads is fine and worked with what he got, and can't be blamed for the execs pushing out Johnny Either way it doesn't break the lore seeing as good old Waldy seems to change his looks every time we see him I just like to imagine his true form is what Dumbledore saw in the mirror (Johnny)
@manonthemoon6926 ай бұрын
It’s such a shame that we will never see this duel between Dumbledore and Grindelwald on the big screen
@Jamesbull466 ай бұрын
One might say almost criminal
@Poggy6 ай бұрын
they only would have screwed it up, anyway.
@velocityhdx_6 ай бұрын
Why? Did it get canceled?
@spi64556 ай бұрын
Amanda Heard caused them to recast Johnny Depp's character, so some boycotted for that reason. Some boycotted because JK Rowling made statements that hurt the LGBT narrative and they found offensive. In short, viewership was down and Hollywood decided to screw over all the fans ... just like they do on most good series.
@tobiasgregori38426 ай бұрын
Probably for the best.
@Kitz4196 ай бұрын
Death is the true owner of the Elder wand. Notice how all it’s “owners” die… 😂 the true owner of the Wand will never know defeat… that is Death my friends. Only death will never know defeat. It’s doesn’t matter who has the wand, death is always the winner of your duel. Your own death or your opponent’s.
@AustynSN6 ай бұрын
I've thought for a long while that was the reason Harry truly earned the wand's loyalty. When he got up in the forest after willingly taking Voldemort's "Avada Kedavra", the wand saw that Harry had actually defeated its true master, Death.
@alberthaystowniiijd28216 ай бұрын
One must accept death to own it. Tom could not accept death. Hence, the horcruxs were in play until Harry, and Company found them subsequently destroying them. If Tom was a 90; then is Harry a 91, 92, 93, 94, or a 95?
@andrasylvan99156 ай бұрын
I honestly think Dumbledore won over Grindelwald because not only he was skilled enough, but also because, at that time, he would be filled with feelings of remorse for his sister's death. Combine that with his love for her and the will to perhaps make things right. That lead him to victory.
@Mackedo56 ай бұрын
I think Skeeter got it partially correct. I think Grindelwald did surrender, but only after a prolonged and brutal fight. My head canon (supported by Grindelwald showing remorse in prison) is that he actually did overpower Dumbledore, but rather than kill a man he still loved, he surrendered. He realized what he had become, who he was about to kill, and stopped himself at the brink of no return. Just my thoughts.
@warrengouldthorpe50916 ай бұрын
I do wish they make the 4th and 5th fantastic beasts films but one can dream
@Masterjediwizard6 ай бұрын
I'm right behind you on that
@megaham15524 ай бұрын
Might happen someday, it's only put on hold for now
@SM0RN1246 ай бұрын
I think this deserves a whole movie to itself
@davidkennedy89296 ай бұрын
The first cop out scenario is what I’ve always thought. How could Grindlewald be master of the Elder wand when he had stolen it in the first place!
@richardgoreilly47066 ай бұрын
A combo of first and last. Thanks for pointing out the "I never had it" reference - I have pointed that out to others for quite some time.
@eliasthienpont63306 ай бұрын
It is clear to me at least that Grindelwald surrendered to Dumbledore, and let us mark that one up to love.
@jenothemississippianofmand52025 ай бұрын
I think that Grindelwald was more unwilling to hurt/kill Dumbledore, than Dumbledore was willing to stop him. Dumbledore was literally Grindelwald’s weakness. Not because of their magical abilities but because he loved Dumbledore. In the fight we see in Secrets of Dumbledore, Grindelwald easily overpowers him in a prior incantatum, but his expression says it all. Id also like to think that Aberforth also participated in this duel and contributed to Grindelwald’s defeat. But was forgotten.
@badslime64533 ай бұрын
I hope they truly give the Fantastic Beasts series the love it deserves, there is still 13 years from Secrets of Dumbledore to this Legendary Duel in 1945, we still have Albus meeting Tom Riddle, the Basilisk attacks and 5 years of Albus procrastinating on fighting Grindelwald.
@itsyaboidragon6 ай бұрын
I have always thought that the reason people call it the power of "Love" is because magic comes from a person's will and it is the most powerful set of emotions. Will is defined as "the capability of conscious choice and decision and intention". So this would make sense as to why "Love" is the most powerful magic.
@user-me7iw6ft8z6 ай бұрын
None of the deathly hollows as strong as they say, including the elder wand. Dumbledore was simply more skilled.
@BWBDCan6 ай бұрын
The invisibility cloke seems to be the best of the 3. It hasn't worn down like all others.
@elijahyoung81166 ай бұрын
It’s sad that we won’t get to see the duel since the Fantastic beasts franchise was canceled
@lewa95756 ай бұрын
I never watched any of those movies but I was still waiting to see that duel. Honestly a huge shame. I heard the first one was good though so I need to watch it sometime.
@kaywire60996 ай бұрын
the first fantastic beasts movies is definitely worth the watch, I wouldn’t bother with the other two though unless you just want to see the cool visual effects.
@elijahyoung81166 ай бұрын
In my personal opinion the main reason I’ve grown to love the movies is because the actors blend so well with their characters
@Dragondan19876 ай бұрын
@@lewa9575they are pretty good. I feel if WB hadn’t pulled that crap with Johnny Depp, it would of made enough money for the last 1 or 2 movies.
@soph.studios216 ай бұрын
And they didn’t even make a whole lot of money off of it in the trilogy because I think everyone’s mad with Johnny Depp being gone in the franchise.
@ethans93796 ай бұрын
I think the "love" and "outclassed" theories hold the most water, tbh
@AustynSN6 ай бұрын
My head canon is sort of a combination of multiple of these. I think that while they started the duel in earnest, the love between them caused them both to falter in their attacks on each other. Grindelwald dropped his wand hand, (with the wand still in it) and the elder wand, sensing Grindelwald's "weakness" and the presence of a power greater than itself (love), went wild, attacking both wizards in some way. Dumbledore turned against the wand, trying to capture it while Hagrid dragged an injured Grindelwald to safety. Dumbledore managed to take hold of the wand and will it down, earning its loyalty. Hagrid's saving of Grindelwald is what earned him Dumbledore's eternal trust.
@doubleupload56206 ай бұрын
Since grindwld had the elderwand and couldn’t lose I think dumbledore just brought a gun and shot him then picked up the wand when he was crying in the floor
@FallenDcd6 ай бұрын
you should do an episode with how muggles throughout the wizarding worlds history came across or some how found out in some way that the wizarding world exists or a witch or wizard revealed to a muggle that the world exists, idk it's just something that seems really interesting to ponder.
@bailatwerski29516 ай бұрын
Very Very Detailed and Interesting theories 😊
@rickywebb18036 ай бұрын
I’ve always figured theory 1 was what happened but if you think about it the wand maker (I can’t spell his name) most likely wasn’t the master either he didn’t seem like the dueling type so he most likely obtained the wand by just buying it from someone who didn’t know what they had or stole it too
@BjornV19946 ай бұрын
I think it is combination of being outclassed and the Elder Wand's possible tendency to constantly be looking for better witches and wizards to be wield by, acting on this when this better candidate presents themselves. When Dumbledore and Grindelwald met for their duel, the Elder Wand might have instinctively known that Dumbledore's potential is higher than Grindelwald, who might already have reached his ceiling at this point. So it became curious who would win without its extra help. Hence it attuned itself to Dumbledore's wand potential so the victor would be truely the more powerful wizard and worthy of wielding it. I believe the Elder Wand allows it master to be conquered if they are either at the end of their life, having reached their maximum potential or if they are up against someone who has more potential to reach greater magical heights. Being careless, like allowing the wand to be stolen or being disarmed in simple ways, however does sever the wands loyality completely as an unforgivable sign of weakness and the only thing the new owner have to do, is show the bare minimum of being better by punishing the previous owner (defeating them in whatever way, death certainly is a possibility but the wand doesn't demand it).
@kmk210896 ай бұрын
Please take a longer pause after punctuations. Loving these vids and they are otherwise perfect to fall asleep to but the lack of a break between sentences is really jarring.
@rolfgunnemann51726 ай бұрын
I've always thought of the Duel between Dumbledore and Grindelwald being a bit like a Wizarding World version of Anakin and Obi Wan's duel on Mustafar. They knew each other so well that they were able to counter each other and predict each other's moves. Maybe Dumbledore got the high ground?
@Weathernerd276 ай бұрын
I think Dumbledoor was more powerful and Grindewald knew it. Dumbledoor might not know as much dark magic but there were ways for Grindewald to defeat Dumbledoor without dark magic. The blood pact was a strategic move by Grindewald to keep a more powerful adversary out of the picture. Grindewald was counting on getting a big following behind him. Dumbledoor went along with the blood pact because Grindewald wasn't pure evil and at first Dumbledoor just saw Grindewalds good side.
@headstrongbachelor31526 ай бұрын
Dumbledore defeated Grindelwald simply because he was more skilled. Grindelwald became owner of the elder wand because he stunned Gregorovitch.
@chimmyinfernape91896 ай бұрын
My theory is the elder wand works similarly to the mirror of eriset in philosophers stone. That it’s true power can only by someone who wants to own the elder want but not use it. Like it’s a fail safe put into the wand so then someone seeking to be the strongest can gain power but cannot use it against others. It has the power to cast defensive magic and other great feats but cannot use its true power with offensive/dark magic
@garyalfrey10026 ай бұрын
you wrongly equate power and skill. Case in point dumbledore displays more "skill" in his duel with voldemort in the MoM, Voldemort goes for pure power where as Dumbledore uses a very wide variety of magic to protect himself and harry, while also working to subdue voldemort. Dumbledore while evidently "powerful" is also highly skilled and skill in turn can make up for a lack in raw power (and vice versa, like a person who only has a hammer in their bag of tricks).
@芦白龙6 ай бұрын
It was proven in wizarding theory that Dumblydoor and Grindlywald that their two final d-d-d-d-duel, that eventually sent the pale ape to the shadow realm took place at ground zero at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, it was a ploy constructed by the non-non-mage in America and Britain to exploit the world war and the wizarding war, to manipulate the hoomans to think that Atom bombs are a thing when it was simply just wizards playing with their extending rods that magik splurges out of, facts
@Kris2005isMine6 ай бұрын
I was thinking something along the lines of the last theory, rather akin to the Majin Vegeta effect. The Elder Wand enabled Grindelwald to fight on a comparable level, but he was too far behind Dumbledore, who had spent the last twenty years studying, while Grindelwald had been searching for the Elder Wand and consolidating his base.
@Harry-Hartmann6 ай бұрын
A very Good Video 👍🏻
@brandonperkins28776 ай бұрын
The Dumbledore Grindelwald Duel never really fascinated me. I’ve always felt the duel between Slytherin and Gryffindor Is the Duel that played the most significant role in wizarding history and is the greatest duel in history.
@katiebugg70186 ай бұрын
By replacing Johnny Depp, they completely rode out the fact that Dumbledore and Grindelwald are supposed to be the same age, and brought in an actor that looks a decade older than him😂
@Circleupfl4 ай бұрын
True. But I actually prefer the new grindlewald more. That’s probably the only opinion I have that is different than most peoples on the issue
@katiebugg70184 ай бұрын
@@Circleupfl most movie fans agree with you it’s just the book fans that take issue with rage Dumbledore 😂 I think if I wasn’t book obsessed I’d probably like that Dumbledore gets more unhinged as the plot thickens because , accurate.
@indatube5 ай бұрын
I always said he beat the Elder Wand by Expeliarmus or pickpocketing while distracting him with a discussion or Accio wand or Dumbledore evoked old magic putting himself in harm’s way out of love hoping Grindelvvald loved him enough not to kill him with Avada Kedavra in a gambit that paid off. Either way I’m sure it was anti climatic. The wand is unbeatable head to head or was the instrument used to cast the first Killing curse and Dumbledore is probably the only Wizard in history to not boast and broadcast what he possesses, avoiding conflict and covetousness altogether.
@bobbynolastname31196 ай бұрын
i would love a book series of albus dumblore's life or a book version of the Fantastic Beasts saga and what wasnt shown.
@eranshachar99546 ай бұрын
I do not support the first theory. Since we saw Grindelwald was able to control it quite well. I think he was lying to Voldemort when he said that. May I remind you that Harry stole it from Draco in a similar fashion? It worked for him. The love and surrender theories sit well with me the most. In terms of surrender- Super Carlin Brothers theorized that Dumbledore's original wand and the elder wand were twins in core. They think so because Dumbledore is familiar with Priori Incantatem, so much as if it already happened to him before for example in his duel with Grindelwald possibly. So if it's true maybe Grindelwald understood fighting is pointless and surrendered.
@chikowashere5 ай бұрын
I think that they had the same and cores, which would explain why Dumbledore knew about it in book 4 after Harry described what his and Voldemort's wands did. And that's why Dumbledore avoided the duel with him, because he was afraid that he'd see his sister again and have to face her. He blamed himself for her death, and he was afraid that she might come out of his wand. Revealing that not only was her death Dumbledore's fault, but also his own doing.
@UnclePlaysBadly6 ай бұрын
Dumbledore distracted Grindelwald by doing a striptease while dueling.
@WolverineMRD6 ай бұрын
I know this is not related to this video but I have a question if you don't mind. We all know that the Quill Of Acceptance and The Book Of Admittance are responsible for registering students into hogwarts, in Tom Riddle's case (an orphan) his mother gave birth to him in the orphanage and gave him a name which was known to the people who worked there (Tom Marvolo Riddle), but what if we were talking about an orphan who's origins are not really known? An orphan given a name at the orphanage but no surname, will the Quill or the Book be able to figure out the surname? What would be even written in the book? Will the Quill or the Book be able to know the origins of this orphan? Their true family or lineage? What would happen in this case? Please answer me, I'm really dying to know, and if you don't have an answer based on the lore just tell me what you think would happen, I would love to hear your opinions and thank you in advance for your answers, personally I think that the Quill will be able to know what the orphan's surname is or to which family they belong. What do you think?
@MountainFisher6 ай бұрын
I'm over 70 years old and orphanages give surnames to children was the practice before the foster programs began in earnest. If picked for Hogwarts before they are adopted the quill of acceptance would simply change their surname before their Letter is sent out.
@WolverineMRD6 ай бұрын
@@MountainFisher I see, thank you:)
@Enigmatic216 ай бұрын
I had never considered that Grindelwald was not the true master of the elder wand because Dumbledore clearly became the master of the wand but this makes total sense in how Dumbledore was able to defeat Grindelwald. The question now is how Dumbledore became the master of the elder wand. Disarming Gregorovich at a later date is as good a theory as any.
@Rnerdy1976 ай бұрын
Maybe it's just if you aren't the wands true master it doesn't give a witch or wizard more power
@marcoh7036 ай бұрын
I think a combination your combinations. If there comes a duel it will be a emotional one for both characters. Maybe the last spell of Grindlewald will be a patronus in the form of a phoenix. But if hope for a karaoke sing off..
@Srinidhi007266 ай бұрын
I always think Dumbledore is resourceful, smart and cunning enough to have been in Slytherin
@donnyh34976 ай бұрын
I wish someone would make an animated account of that legendary duel and put it on KZbin
@mecahhannah6 ай бұрын
❤ Awesome as always thanks
@Crashburn711TeamXtinction6 ай бұрын
You could even go farther and say Dumbledore asked Grigorafitch for ownership before going to confront Grindelwald.
@calvincoolidge57953 ай бұрын
this battle happened in 1945. So obviously the battle was interrupted by a nuclear explosion test, that Dumbledore managed to shield himself against but Grindelwald lost the wand in the explosive blast.
@charlienylin99786 ай бұрын
Could you maybe do a video about what was happening in the wizarding world during ww1
@grandmyotismon6 ай бұрын
Either he was more skilled so the power boost of the wnad didnt matter while its owner was being Outmanoeuvred or he was more skilled and the elder wand refused its full power to an inferior combatant. Either way i think ultimately dumbledore won because he was a better duelist.
@AceJoker726 ай бұрын
Would love to see your take on whether or not Snape knew that Lockhart was a phony adventurer bc he could easily look into his mind and see the truth. Dumbledore should've been able to see it as well yet Lockhart was still allowed to teach at the school.
@HarryPotterTheory6 ай бұрын
According to canon, Dumbledore DID know that Lockhart was a fraud. Snape probably suspected it but couldn't confirm. The following passage is from Wizarding World!: "Albus Dumbledore’s plans, however, ran deep. He happened to have known two of the wizards for whose life’s work Gilderoy Lockhart had taken credit, and was one of the only people in the world who thought he knew what Lockhart was up to. Dumbledore was convinced that Lockhart needed only to be put back into an ordinary school setting to be revealed as a charlatan and a fraud. Professor McGonagall, who had never liked Lockhart, asked Dumbledore what he thought students would learn from such a vain, celebrity-hungry man. Dumbledore replied that ‘there is plenty to be learned even from a bad teacher: what not to do, how not to be"
@nathanielmartinez25516 ай бұрын
Wait! November? of 1945! I thought J.K. Rowling didn't reveal the month that Dumbledore defeated Grindelvald (Grindelwald)? Only the year?
@aleksaknezevic3723Ай бұрын
3:28 I'm hearing this for the first time, though I have studied the Elder Wand and its path through history for quite some time now - Dumbledore had a duel against Gregorovitch as well, in which he disarmed him respectively?
@rustysm80806 ай бұрын
My theory is based on what Olivander states; the wand CHOOSES the wizard. And he says that has ALWAYS been true. So, the Elder Wand, the best of all wands, has greater control over who it CHOOSES to be its owner. Grendelwald was never chosen. Gregorovich also...was never chosen. In fact, the string of loses by the owners of the elder wand tells me something else: NONE of the previous owners were chosen, except the original maker of the wand, who was murdered in his sleep if Beedle is remotely true. So, the wand searched for it's next owner, someone truly worthy. And, Grendelwald may have POSSESSED it, but as soon as it came in contact with Dumbledore, it made its decision then and there. So, while certainly powerful in anyone's hands, it would seek out that worthy owner leaving the possesser an achilles heel. Based on this, ownership went from the Brother...to Dumbledore. . To Harry...with no owners in between. And, the wand would not, could not, best it's new owner, no matter how gifted the user is...or was.
@jakeroberts30706 ай бұрын
I dont think a minor stat point bump would warrant Harry destroying the wand. I would wager its power scales with its allegiance. If youre fighting someone the wand would prefer as an owner, it backs off the power to ensure it finds its way to the other witch/wizard.
@brucevernon58275 ай бұрын
The elder wand always betrayed its owner , and returned the owner back to the Reaper Death
@Colin13ify6 ай бұрын
Johnny Depp will always be Grindelwald to me. It’s such bs to be fired over unfounded accusations, until proven guilty.
@nategraham69462 ай бұрын
The ownership question is tricky. What makes us think Gregoravich was a legitimate owner?
@velcity41906 ай бұрын
Actually albus was older than grindelwald
@grokeffer62266 ай бұрын
These theories all make good sense.
@monkey391286 ай бұрын
Good old fashioned fisticuffs.
@Dragondan19876 ай бұрын
That’s my theory. It explains Albus broken nose and would be a very griffindor thing to do since griffindor carried a sword to fight muggles.
@francisgrizzlysmit47156 ай бұрын
I believe Dumbledore was more powerful and just out classed Grindalvald
@Mr.NorwegianMarcus6 ай бұрын
What about the seer theory?? I heard a theory while back that Grindlewald foresaw Voldemort and the carnage he would cause to the wizarding world And as we know he don't want wizards dead In addition he didn't foresee that Tom is Voldemort, just that some dark wizard would emerge and probably that Dumbledore would need the elderwand That would at least make the quarter of truth thing with Rita be right in this case, too
@Svensk71195 ай бұрын
Dumbledore was a shade better. Or if they were equals, Dumbledore never took shortcuts. Grindelwald certainly would have. The Dark Arts are nothing but shortcuts. "IS the Dark Side stronger?" "No! No. Quicker. Easier. More seductive." Like Master Yoda, Dumbledore put in the work. Grindelwald would if he must, but was not obey being lazy. Thus, he came to rely too much upon the wand's power. So Dumbledore won, because his old friend had become sloppy.
@Demonoicgamer6666 ай бұрын
Last theory you read a quote the implied the are equally powerful
@fishandjam53836 ай бұрын
9:10 The first part of the biography was published a year before that. 😂
@jkent99155 ай бұрын
I don’t think the elder wand (or any wand) has to have a master. Just because Gregorovitch had the wand doesn’t mean he was the master. He likely bought it from someone who stole it and also didn’t win its allegiance. I think it’s by design. The elder wand is often acquired by means that wouldn’t win allegiance and Dumbledore may not have even been the master of it and not known its true power.
@TacticalPower886 ай бұрын
This unbeatable wand seems to keep getting beaten. Its more like a trophy if anything.
@terakhanthis6 ай бұрын
As of the Fantastic Beasts movies, Grindelwald shouldn't be the master of the wand, so it s out of play. Movie 1, he was disarmed, established as enough to take it. Movie 3, Dumbledore basically beat him and forced his retreat.
@aimblackbird6 ай бұрын
I think i like this version
@ChattieGrayParker3 ай бұрын
Love is wonderful magic what we have💕💕💕🤗
@joebonanno91456 ай бұрын
I guess you can say he was taken from behind 😂
@MarioA_6 ай бұрын
I still have the hope we could get the 2 last movies in the saga :/
@gunzandgodz6 ай бұрын
He blew him so hard he exploded.
@jp_eight36 ай бұрын
Wtf
@Auto_Learning6 ай бұрын
Lol
@summerweetman74416 ай бұрын
They say Voldemort is the darkest wizard of all time and he has supposedly done far more dark magic than grindalwald. So I would say Voldemort is more powerful and Dumbeldoor could Atleast draw even with Voldemort so I support the albus is more advanced and skillful theory
@thomasdavies27016 ай бұрын
I think if a wand any wand that is can channel the will of its user then its not to far fetched to say if the users will is broken during a duel that could be considered a win for the opposition maybe the fault is the user
@andrewweber99306 ай бұрын
Grindlewald❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@newhybrid1016 ай бұрын
Wasn't it confirmed that Grindelwald wasn't the wands true owner? I remember hearing that when the last movie was released. Anyways,at that point in time Dumbledore was simply better Its stated they were equal in power but Dumbledore was more skilled. Without the Elder Wand they wouldn't have been equal in power,Dumbledore would be clearly stronger Grindelwald isnt as powerful as Voldemort. This is confirmed. As while Dumbledores defences are the greatest and overall the greatest,Voldemort had the most powerful offence ever. In attack potency he was the strongest ever,just not the greatest ever and that due to his mentality of ignoring aspects aside from the dark ones. In potential and talent he is stated to be probably number 1. Dumbledore and Grindelwald being equal younger doesnt mean they will be equal later We dont all develop at the same rate in anything. Like how some kids are the same height young but as adults one is much taller The Elder Wand isnt stated to make you unbeatable. It is a considerable amp due to how powerful it is but thats about it.
@EllisR.6 ай бұрын
Except for the Rita Skeeter fake news (which you magnanimously included even though we all know it's just flamboyant Skeeter trash), I think that the other four are not only valid theories but also simultaneous reasons that combine for an overall multi-factor explanation. Nothing about any of the non-Skeeter explanations contradicts the others, and all ring true.
@johnedwards62086 ай бұрын
Grindewald: At the time, the leader of the wizarding world's equivalent of muggle conservatives.
@richewilson63946 ай бұрын
I know everybody's like why this is such a dumb idea by having a physical removal of the want to consider the ownership AKA how Harry takes away Draco's wand and becomes the master. But I think of it as this is that it's a power of wills; The stronger the willl to take it is going to win when it comes to a physical theft of the wand. Magically it's a given that whoever wins is going to own it but if a person takes it through other means like that as a daring and strong will of character.
@phoneguy46376 ай бұрын
with a kiss
@grudgematch66536 ай бұрын
If this was considered the best duel in history, then what was the 2nd best?
@pavanachar93586 ай бұрын
11:30 BGM?
@bigg75056 ай бұрын
The only true grindelwald is Johnny Depp... i refuse to watch this movie without him.
@baraka4906 ай бұрын
You may have stolen in a cowardly fashion but he still used his wits therefore he beat him in real life chess game of the mind because he managed to get the wand therefore he at least used some kind of brain to be able to get it
@leviwilliams96016 ай бұрын
Its simple. Dumbledore is just incredibly over powered.
@timz42176 ай бұрын
No every has it wrong every weirder to own wand loses it on purpose it is curssed to be the most powerful but always betray it owner
@raghavparanjpe95566 ай бұрын
A wand is as good as the wizard
@melanievetter62116 ай бұрын
😊🎉🦁
@That_dude916 ай бұрын
Please use accurate Grindelwald depiction and not this knock off stand in dude 🥺
@RajaPea-ni4zs6 ай бұрын
There was absolutely nothing twisted or incorrect about Grindelwald’s perspectives. The United Kingdom and the United States are falling apart at the seams because we are letting in people who don’t have a shared agenda of a Christian European ancestry to tear these countries and try to make them everything except for what they are. If other groups were the same, they would be able to also likewise build their own nations in their respective continents to the same degree of success that Europe has. These people have not been able to do so, but want to come to all the white European countries and exploit them for their resources and affluency. Grindelwald is essentially doing what needs to be done to preserve merit-based achievement and accomplishments, and not bending the knee to ineptitude. I hate to bring this up, but in certain instances Dolores Umbridge was absolutely correct. Certain types of progress for the sake of progress to be discouraged.