How Fast Can Women Name 100 Women? - A Statistical Analysis

[@Xenoxygene]

This challenge was originally meant for men, but a few women actually streamed themselves participating so I thought it'd be nice to compare their performance to the men's! I also added a lot of streamers that people suggested! Enjoy more stats

[@idkyet9458]

what about instead of just naming women, name 100 people

[@dieucondorimperial2509]

That’s not even taking into consideration the fact that these women have way longer hair ! We’ve seen people with shorter hair get better time, a bald woman would completely wreck the leaderboard !

[@glowco.717]

Maya has shaved her head before for a charity thing so that could be where her power comes from

[@Marshall.R]

CONCLUSION: It doesn't matter whether men or women are better at this because everyone got clowned on by Fantano either way

[@yeszoplusfriends]

He is the Internet's busiest woman fan

[@rickybobbylarge1059]

Why are bald men so cracked at this

[@IlIlIlIlIlIlIllIlIII]

I tried Fantano's version, got 10:53. Turns out he basically only did American and Brittish musicians, while most of mine were European.

[@NeedForMadnessSVK]

@@rickybobbylarge1059 Because we have to have actual interests and personality to get them to like us. You hairy mfers have it too easy.

[@SomeGalNamedEve]

As a woman, I'm honestly surprised the women's times were so much faster than the men's. This seemed like much more of a test on your knowledge of celebrities than your knowledge of women lol

[@Xenoxygene]

The sample size is pretty small but their performances were quite impressive!

[@blearkob]

Fully agree on the celebrities thing, I don't think I could name 100 googleable people period

[@dmarsub]

​@@blearkobthe question is how men and women would do in the name 100 men category. My prediction is men would do significantly better while women would have an on average rather similar performance, compared to their name 100 women performance As a woman who is terrible with any names, and is not into celeb culture, the dame would likely be true just slower in both categories.

[@devastatheseeker9967]

It's probably because (I assume) the list is of notable women. Like you ask me to name 100 women and I can't pick my mother, my sister my 2 cousins, my 2 room mates, several friends?

[@LiveOutLoud321]

@@dmarsubThat would be a super interesting comparison!! I think it’s possible men might just do equally better if swapped but I’m not sure. It’s not impossible that other factors could exist that would skew results in favor of women generally speaking or on average when it comes to naming public figures. For example, maybe women are more aware of people/names due to societal expectations or other factors or it’s even possible that (again I’m not sure) women’s brains are generally wired in a way that is advantageous to some level or degree. Or maybe it would just work out like you’re theorizing which is possible too.

[@JosaxJaz]

after doing this data analysis, this guy has got to know the most women's names out of anyone in the whole world

[@casslago7614]

0:24 so close doug is actually bald but I love the point you’re going for!

[@SomeGalNamedEve]

Woah, genderfae flag spotted in the wild :3

[@pialba]

and ludwig is not

[@ProclaimingProductions]

I was coming to the comments to say this

[@Nen_niN]

​@@pialbawdym?

[@velbutvel]

@@pialba have u seen how bad his hairline is receding? its on his back at this point

[@idontneedaname318]

ive heard a lot of criticism of xqc but nothing has damaged my esteem of him more than him GIVING UP after 9 minutes

[@hugogieles4816]

Can't believe nl lost by 1second

[@MangroveLord]

He was our last hope

[@lukes.3679]

I didn't watch Maya's attempt but I can say NL was also listing the job of the women he named and generally doing things that wasted time. It was entertaining. I do wonder how he'd do if he wasn't streaming. The same could be said about most entries, though.

[@GolfcuBebe]

Nl retimed it actually he could easily get sub 3 with limiting himself anyway. Dont forget he didnt name a streamer or internet personality

[@tim..indeed]

Nl limited himself to not name internet personalities. In the end they're both insanely good at this.

[@WhatIsTheHeat]

⁠@@GolfcuBebewhy did he retime was it just because he wanted to it without streamers

[@TeamBuster]

So, obviously the reason why so many streamers were named was that the participants were, themselves streamers. Since they were friends with other streamers, they could simply name their friends which is much easier than coming up with actresses or historical figures. I would be interested to see how the results would change with non-streamer participants, I imagine streamers would be a less popular category and times would go up overall.

[@peytonsawyer562]

We should make historical figures to take this test and see if they name more historical figures than others

[@jonathannash8471]

I hardly named any streamers. My most popular categories were Musicians (63 total, I am one), Politicians, and Actresses. Historical figures would probably have overtaken actresses for me but I didn't realise until after that you can name dead people.

[@vince8901]

I'd hardly know any streamers and would probably name mostly comedians, politicians and historical figures

[@baintreachas]

Times would go up? Ive done this with some people ik and they all got around 10 minutes, i think stage fright makes times go up

[@sovdee]

thank you james acaster these videos are great

[@Xenoxygene]

I started watching Taskmaster a few weeks ago and am now on the season James Acaster is on, this guy is hilarious

[@sovdee]

@@Xenoxygene he's probably one of my top 3 or so contestants brilliant guy

[@zirkereuler5242]

So that's who is face reminds me of, I was going insane

[@ohno-wi1vb]

I thought that too!

[@redumptious2544]

Suck it, bebee!!!

[@adamperdue3178]

I think I'd struggle to name 100 people in general, if I was only allowed to use Googleable names.

[@ohmyyyy]

Well theyre all like 30 and im gonna assume youre probably a lot younger

[@adamperdue3178]

@@ohmyyyy If you can call 29 a lot younger than 30... The game makes it so that you can only really name celebrities/influencers, and historical figures. Except a large percentage of widely known historical figures are men, so unless you're well-versed in a rather niche topic that has a lot of women in it (such as say, poetry or art) then it's essentially just a test of how much you keep up with celebrities, rather than a commentary on how much the person taking the test knows/cares about women.

[@benrex7775]

@@adamperdue3178 Some of the people I know are googleable, but their names would also make me doxable. For example the university I currently go to has a few women I could list.

[@oh.sorry.dont.mind.meeeee]

​@@adamperdue3178😅 it's the patriarchy's fault, but that's also partially your fault for not learning about more women politicians or historical figures or public figures that aren't celebrities. that's the whole point of the test, and you're explaining why the test is hard, as if that isn't the entire point. same with naming athletes over pornstars, seeing people's lists tells you a lot about how they spend their time and what they think about women.

[@CLaw-tb5gg]

as a scientist it bothers me to an inordinate degree people aren't being asked to also name 100 men as a control. being asked to name 100 women on its own doesn't really prove anything other than a basic memory test (or simply how many celebrities you know overall, and you're filtering out the men). but if people were better at naming men than women, which i suspect they would be, that would be significant

[@FeeshUnofficial]

That's exactly why I decided not to suggest to my friends to do this challenge. I don't even think I can name a hundred people regardless of gender

[@FeeshUnofficial]

That's exactly why I decided not to suggest to my friends to do this challenge. I don't even think I can name a hundred people regardless of gender

[@Korinengamecorp]

I mean, it's not SUPPOSED to be a scientifically rigorous experiment. It's an evolution of the "name a woman to prove you're not misogynistic". It's a J O K E This challenge was only done for shits and giggles, not to prove anything I think it's also VERY obvious that people on average, would be able to name 100 men faster

[@paulo25740]

I honestly think the part about it being just women is to throw people off from the get-go. This isn't a hard task, regardless of the gender of the guesser / guessee. Some streamers lack the skill of connecting a face to a name or don't understand the strategies to do so ...

[@DROGGELBECHERd]

I mean another part is definitely the sample size here xd

[@glassea4820]

"are women better than men… at naming women?" me, out loud: YES!

[@Nine-gf2hd]

Yeah thats about it tho

[@Echinacae]

@@troveionno?

[@proxility8981]

@@Nine-gf2hdNo bro I can beat ur ass in a roblox obby trust me

[@eriklarsen6790]

@@whatdoievenputhere11 How's that sexist? It's kinda just true.

[@eriklarsen6790]

@@whatdoievenputhere11 I don't understand what you mean by that. You are saying that this commenter is being sexist, right?

[@handoverthestromboli6715]

NL and Fantano have pioneered the "specific skip," a speedrunning strat where you intentionally restrict yourself to a topic in order to keep your brain on track

[@IntuitiveBackpacker]

Not sure if you saw it, but Toast tweeted out a twist on QT’s challenge of challenging people to name as many Asian public figures as possible since May is Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month. Depending on the results, maybe there’s video/data analysis potential there!

[@badaboum2]

Having just tried my hand at that, I feel like this is going to end up in debates over who counts and who doesn't count as Asian. Do Middle-Easterners count? Even Israelis? How about Russians, do they have to originate from east of the Ural mountains? Does someone like Auli'i Carvalho (4.6% Chinese) count?

[@IntuitiveBackpacker]

@@badaboum2 I tried it too just counting on my hands and I got to 68 before I had to get back to something else I was taking a break from but I thought about that too! As I was doing it, I was thinking that maybe the easiest rule of thumb might just be that if you either know or it’s highly reasonable to assume they identify as fully or partly asian, then it’s reasonable to include and count them. For example, naming Hailee Steinfeld (actress) would count since she’s 1/8 Filipino. That could still get tricky but at least it applies some kind of structure while still having wiggle room.

[@Cpt.Stickerno0dle-iu3ok]

Emiru naming the most corn actresses out of all the women makes sense but is till really funny

[@modprog]

they sure are, I'm gonna hand in my resignation on tomorrow

[@peperoni_pepino]

Now I really want to see all of these people name 100 men so we can see whether it is symmetric. Will men be better at naming women? Or will they once again lose by %240 percent?

[@18puppies91]

It's probably a mixture and would be hard to measure, but I would likely to know what causes it. - There are more well-known famous men - Men are more likely to consume content by men - Women have better name recognition - Women know more famous people Etc.

[@SomeGalNamedEve]

@@18puppies91 The first two are very valid points, but where did the last two come from...? I'm a woman, but I'm very bad at names, and not at all interested in celebrities I get that there's a stereotype of women being more into celebrities than men, but that's only a stereotype. And just look at NL's performance, the individual differences between people are WAY bigger than a possible trend of women being better at names lol (Which has to be a really small trend, because I've never even heard of that before)

[@18puppies91]

@@SomeGalNamedEve Oh sorry I wasn't meaning to say that those were causes, I was just trying to think of any possibilities. Like for example if women did better on both, then the difference would be based off their overall viewing / remembering habits, not their's for each gender.

[@themysteriousturtleneck]

Fuslie did both. More historical figures were named in the men's category than in the women's. She included all Kings name Henry Before Henry the 8th though

[@themysteriousturtleneck]

Same. I think more historical figures and less celebrities will be named in the men category. With men having faster times than naming all women and women having semi faster or comparable (difference of 3 mins more or less) results naming With men. Also I think all the straight men will name 0 porn actors

[@DanDN_]

0:25 incorrect Doug Doug is CLEARLY bald

[@cyn7928]

supertf with an hour, THATS MY STREAMER

[@alexlund2125]

its insane someone beat NL he was flying through them.

[@zeyface6366]

He lost time naming their occupation

[@nullhumorexception9960]

Got totally jumpscared by seeing Étoiles here, I just love that guy.

[@destitution25]

I think that using the arithmetic mean is kinda a poor choice given this dataset and the variance that lies within it. I think that using the median for the average would be a more fair and better representation of the data. This would put the overall average as 17:14, the male average as 17:17, and the female average as 15:19

[@benrex7775]

It would have been worth to point out at least.

[@moonpalace.mp3]

I tried this after the first video and got a time of 10:38, which isn't bad but also like 90% of my names were kpop idols lmao

[@angelelelelalalalalelae]

REALL, loona and twice carried

[@alexandrebertone4351]

The video is amazing in quality and rythm, you definetly deserve more subs !

[@richard8670]

I'm only at 0:53 but theres no way fantano doesnt just name 100 female artists in 20 seconds. All of the streamers could probably name 100 fictional women but real woman? nah

[@18puppies91]

Both the videos you have done on this are really well made! Often people who do videos on streamers struggle to keep the subs interested as they only watched the video due to the people it was about, but your personality, editing, and thumbnail skills make me think anything you post will be popular. Im definitely interested in watching more videos from you!

[@LunaLamperouge]

I'm not surprised about Tubbo having the least actresses, he knows NO ONE, he literally has asked who tf is Brad Pitt, Tom Cruise is, and many other A/S list celebrities. And of course, he had a lot of streamers, that's the only thing he knows lmaooo

[@benrex7775]

A little while ago a female friend of mine asked me how many female actresses' I could name. I could only name Amber Heart, but only because of the trial. When it comes to men I can name Johnny Depp, The Rock, Morgan Freeman and Budd Spencer and Terrenes Hill and the Legolas guy (I forgot the name). There is probably one or two actors I would also know. I don't count names which I've heard but wouldn't recognize in a picture if it were in front of me, like Brad Pitt or Magan Fox (I think she is also an actor). I also don't count names where I know the image from a movie but I have no clue who the actor is. Of course, the number of names I can say when I ignore that I know nothing about them besides their name would rise. But then I could also just say random plausible sounding names in the hopes that they exist somewhere.

[@Waltimate]

The sequel I didn't know I wanted, but was oh so happy to have seen. Incredible work!

[@oblivi8games808]

I tried the challenge, but I don't really know Musicians, actresses, or streamers (men or women really, I just don't keep up on music and movies), so this challenge was HARD ngl

[@filipm133]

What about sports, history, politics, science, art, literature... You definitely know 100 women

[@oblivi8games808]

@@filipm133 I know nothing about sports, did get about 10 historical figures, like 4 politicians, the only female scientist I can think of easily is Marie Curie, no interest in art, and I'm fairly certain the challenge specifies real women, not book characters. If it was book characters, it would be remarkably easy.

[@ghost-hk3oi]

​@@oblivi8games808 if you don't mind me asking, what are you interested/knowledgeable in, if not those categories? Genuinely curious

[@MellonVegan]

@@filipm133 There is a difference between knowing 100 women and remembering their full names on the spot.

[@oblivi8games808]

@@ghost-hk3oi When it comes to people not all that much to be honest. I read quite a bit but the sci-fi and fantasy genres in particular which are what I primarily read, don't have very many prolific female authors compared to other genres. I'm also quite a big fan of Japanese animated works, but I really only focus on the studios involved in production and the characters, I don't know much about the specific voice talent. I also have a rather large interest in mathematics but... that's not very helpful when it comes to naming women.

[@shamanite]

thank you for including Etoiles

[@Bloodlf]

C'est pas le même temps que celui calculé par etoile c'est bizarre

[@benji37]

j'ai regardé sa vidéo et il a fait 10:30 d'ou sort le 13 min ?

[@ortsheidi]

0:26 that makes no sense everybody knows that Doug Doug is the baldest of them all

[@p0p4]

I would have liked to see all of them name 100 men as well in comparison, because i think that the people who did good and bad would stay the same. It's just a difference in visual or literal brains

[@yurisei6732]

Why is Sydney Sweeney the most named woman by these test subjects? I don't recognise the name at all so I'm surprised it was apparently easier to think of for these people than movie stars like Margot Robbie who have been talked about a ton.

[@Zestrayswede]

Probably because Madame Web recently got released which Sydney Sweeney is in so her name was front of mind, would be my guess.

[@LiveOutLoud321]

Sydney Sweeney is an actress that is kind of having a moment right now it terms of people talking about her and crushing on her

[@panner11]

I was surprised too. Been watching movies all my life, but never came across that name before.

[@um8650]

​@@panner11 I think she is mlre well known for being in some popular TV shows than from movies

[@idontneedaname318]

sydney sweeney is sort of a 'new' actor who is having like, her moment right now

[@badaboum2]

I think it's pretty telling that female athletes were so underrepresented in women's list, pretty representative of the female sports audience even with such a small sample.

[@panner11]

though, we would have to do a men's list to compare. The other factor is that since these are all streamers, sports fandom might be quite underrepresented in general.

[@badaboum2]

@@panner11 I'm saying they're underrepresented compared to the men's (who are also streamers) lists, which are shown in this very video and the previous video on this topic.

[@ethantemple8068]

I died at the bald part holy

[@LiveOutLoud321]

Awesome vid and insights!! It looks like so much work but it’s so cool to see! You noted that Maya (who crushed it) got a better time on another try but just for consideration, QT also got a 06.26 time on her 3rd try when she spent a few minutes on a strategy and threw spelling more out the window since she’s dyslexic. Since she made the rules/challenge and said multiple runs were good, I think she also sorta treated her first run of 14.10 like a practice/test run of sorts which might be noteworthy for her time especially and possibly others with a plan to do more than one run. She also had the disadvantage of going first before anyone else whereas others may have watched people doing it or been motivated by existing times to beat. Just some interesting thoughts.

[@ioioi_prx4639]

He looks exactly like the type of people who would seriously analyze this

[@IdkOrange]

Name a 100 women? Whitney Huston Done.

[@benrex7775]

Are there 100 women who share the named Whitney Huston? That's a nice strategy.

[@GolfcuBebe]

NL still holding that record. My man is unbeatable

[@asheep7797]

9:16 Strangely relevant subtitles.

[@galacticcat8464]

Guess it’s been decided. According to Xenoxygene’s math, Doug has hair

[@brize3452]

not surprised by etoiles, the guy's a knowledge fanatic lol

[@Bloodlf]

Il aurait pu faire tellement mieux!

[@elliekelley8758]

Maya Higa never disappoints. Great vid!

[@18puppies91]

😮 I thought non-human animals was her strong suit!

[@gr.4380]

going off the point that this seems more like a celebrity naming contest, could it be that women follow more celebrities than men? seems like a test for the future, maybe just name 100 famous people...

[@kirouac666]

Good job man and great video

[@anotherKyle]

i just did this and it took me about 40 minutes, then tried to name 100 men and that took me about 30 minutes, which is still faster, but compared to women naming women is atrocious.

[@alexdavis665]

fantano’s performance was pretty impressive by limiting himself so much

[@rsotuyo15]

I tried the challenge and got the exact same time as Dougdoug lol, at least I got some game developers, comicbook artists and writers.

[@alvinip9128]

I'm not gonna be able to name 100 people let alone women

[@TheAmazingHuman-Man]

Fudge dude that was hard. Took me 27:11. Only watched the first minute before deciding to do myself. Wasn’t sure about rules, but decided to use personal family and friends since they were allowed to use themselves. Only used people I knew their first and last name if they didn’t have like a stage alias. Could probably picture 100 faces in my mind in like 60 seconds, but terrible with names. Also found it interesting that I only used maybe a dozen actresses and musicians combined. Don’t hardly watch any film and my music is often random recommendations from yt with no memorable repeats. It took me like a minute just to remember my Aunt’s name! Like I only have 4 and it’s not like I don’t see her maybe once or twice every year.

[@knackigbrot]

Alright. I'm going to do the challenge myself now.

[@deltamico]

If you want to do naming 100 men then consider contacting the same test subjects so the comparison is more direct

[@flippanties]

XQC blaming ADHD for not knowing 100 women is so funny. I have unmedicated ADHD and when I tried the challenge myself I managed it in about 13 mins without naming any streamers.

[@FeeshUnofficial]

Maybe you just have a special interest in women. We all know XQC's special interest is collecting trash

[@yuvibitter]

As if we needed more proof the guy is a douche

[@karnewarrior]

Yeah, plus it seemed like the other guys who gave up did so because it was part of a challenge, whereas with XQC he just got frustrated by his own lack of knowledge, lol. Common XQC L, tbh

[@Ondemas]

To be fair, ADHD can really mess you up when you went to school and learned about all the women who contributed to science, political rights and other important fields. /s

[@FeeshUnofficial]

@@Ondemas I'm pretty confident the reason xQc can't name 100 women is because he's just stupid. Just look up videos of him naming animals

[@sheepox573]

Really good video like last time ! That would be interesting to do the same task with 100 men to see the difference in time and jobs too ;)

[@scottmillor]

Naming 100 men is so easy sports if you follow it at all. Obviously, women’s sports exist, but aren’t well known.

[@felixthelemon978]

Did this challenge after watching the first video and I only got to 26 women before I gave up. Did it again for men to see if I'd do better, and I did, but only up to 32 😭

[@ArnarF]

When I read the title I tried doing it in my head I go only one, Marie Currie and then I gave up

[@miskeenamina]

So good bro. i love this

[@manfrombc5162]

I tried this with baseball players (my one real trivia strength). It took about 14 minutes. I did do the typing on my phone, so that slowed me down a bit, but naming 100 famous people period in less than 10 minutes is seriously impressive.

[@ilovekokolato]

Thank you for the time you spent on this ahah ! Awesome

[@totej39]

i am interested if they were to name 100 men how different the times would be.

[@TheDanishGuyReviews]

I am a man, and I managed to name over 100 Women in 25 minutes. I named like 8 Princesses among them.

[@bezka3545]

I took a look at the spreadsheet and am disappointed no one used Maria Skłodowska-Curie's full name

[@technikchaot]

Now the question is are men faster in case of name 100 men or are women always faster. Because if men are faster in case of naming men there would be a case of they know best people of the same gender. If women are always faster than the conclusion would be more like men care less about "well known persons names"

[@phitc4242]

this gotta evolve to "name 100 men challenge"

[@ToxicSnowflake]

i think that if Etoiles used streamers, he would have got around 5 min before

[@midnattsol6207]

i'm predicting women would also be faster than men at naming 100 men

[@thechosenone5644]

Took me 15:32 but I think I could have been quicker if I added celebrities or artists, because I wasn’t thinking in that direction. I also didn’t allow myself to add biblical figures who aren’t at least pretty well verified. Also I briefly started one time but then stopped to do something else. Men took me a bit over 11 minutes so I think I just have slow recall. Give me time with both and I could name a lot more.

[@Ondemas]

I didn't see anyone mentioning Susan B Anthony. If you don't know about her, check her out! She did tons of work in the US for women's right to speak in public, and to give women and afro-americans the right to vote.

[@macaronsucre]

OUAIIS ETOILES

[@Banondax]

I misread the rules on my first try very wrong, and thought that streamers and dead people do not count. Honestly, it'd be better if it was this way, naming just streamers makes this even easier than it already is, especially for streamers.

[@ferrisffalcis]

this is a very real showcase of the very real "invisible" sexism on day to day life tbh; even if each of these men individually isn't sexist, the environment that led to these results kinda speaks volumes to the communities fostered online

[@benrex7775]

Not necessarily. There is the possibility that men just care less about names in general. Or there is the possibility that men care about topics which have mostly men in them. For example I like devlogs. A devlog is when someone makes videos on a game which they develop as a hobby. This is a small enough scene that there is no societal pressure to push or restrict anyone. And women are about 5% of the people there. So if I watch 20 devloggers, then one of them is likely to be a woman. Also the chance of a man having that as a hobby is 20 times higher. I also like other topics with similar ratios of men to women. Since most of my interests happen to be niche topics that mostly only men participate in, I know a lot more men. This also applies into the other direction. Let's take a person who has sewing as a hobby. I have no clue what the man-woman ratio is there, but are they sexist for knowing more women? If you have a somewhat representative study you should do three things. 1) Also do the same test with the same people, but ask for 100 men. If the male average time is still lower then that shows they are just worse at remembering names in general. 2) Make the participants more diverse. Currently they are all streamers. If you want to have a statistic that means anything then you should have random participants. 3) Do some proper statistical analysis. To make that point I will copy another comment from this comment section: _@destitution5700_ _I think that using the arithmetic mean is kinda a poor choice given this dataset and the variance that lies within it. I think that using the median for the average would be a more fair and better representation of the data. This would put the overall average as __17:14__, the male average as __17:17__, and the female average as __15:19_

[@MB-og3dw]

vtuber skip goes crazy, when i tried i got stuck and then rapidfire to the end i named all the vtubers i could think of lol

[@numberhaver7795]

I didn't think they counted, since I thought of them as fictional characters played by real people.

[@MB-og3dw]

@@numberhaver7795 its finicky but i counted anyone who's primary identity is as that vtuber e.g. ironmouse and doesnt adhere heavily to kayfabe

[@Charlie-hv3dh]

Love these videos lol!! Also I like your profile picture, melia's the best!

[@gobbo_girl]

because of the way you intreduced them ,and the title of the video, i legit for a second thought anthony fantano transitioned lmao

[@icelored1]

I gave up. Got a lot of athletes(from wrestling, cycling, and soccer) and some historic figures, but I sucked at Celebrities because I knew a lot of faces but couldn't remember any of their names.

[@benrex7775]

I don't think I could pass this challenge. I'm bad at memorizing, I'm bad at memorizing names and my hobbies are mostly male dominated fields. For example I don't care about musicians, actors, sports, tv personalities and politicians. I guess I could score a few points by going into religious figures, but the female devloging scene on youtube is not that grand. Similar thing with the worldview conversation or historical youtubers. Even at work, I usually have to hear a persons name several times, as well as seeing it written down, until I can memorize it. Since the youtuber names are written down, they at least have that going for them, but it also requires that I need to follow them for a while to remember them.

[@prosandcons-fl2cc]

Im also interested how this changes between streamers and non streamers

[@rasmusgeo5759]

I think you should do a breakdown of the nationality of the named women

[@Clarissa_M]

I tried it and got 12.06, it's horrible honestly... somehow I just forgot every name I've ever knew

[@aTypicalGabriel]

as a man i feel that i would fair as well in naming 100 women as i would 100 men, it'd take me fucking hours

[@ruriva4931]

I was doing a naming 100 Asians challenge and got tired at like 50 but over 80% were women. Naming 100 women sounds so easy.

[@weareafteryou3975]

I did this but I was doing both men and women at the same time with a friend and together we got 33 women and 113 men in like a 30 minute timespan

[@shangis929]

my time for woman was 1 hour, and 13 minutes for men as an astute gentleman

[@benrex7775]

It would be similar to me and if you know what type of content I watch that is obvious.

[@lulumakaronie3182]

Before watching this I tried to do the challenge too. As a woman, I had a time of 36:53 minutes. Pure pain and suffering, Ill never do that to myself again

[@genericname8727]

I laughed out loud at your joke at the end. I enjoyed this video

[@esrohm6460]

yoh only naming musicians, that would be what i would do, but only because i do not know any streamers or actors names

[@valsonder]

me and a friend tried at different times, i got about 15:35 and they got somewhere around 53 minutes. we're both nonbinary so i think the moral there is nonbinary people will either be pretty good or pretty bad and there is zero middle ground /j

[@zoefezius6615]

I think quite a challenge would be just knowing 100 of those 2200 women 🤨

[@ApfersPL]

this video made me try this challenge. and then made me realize that i don't watch tv and twitch at all 😅 that was awkward. took me about 17 minutes so not great and not terrible.

[@benrex7775]

What types of professions did your women have?

[@AltraHapi]

​@@benrex7775I personally ended up just naming up a ton of politicians because of my lack of celebrity knowledge

[@benrex7775]

@@AltraHapi If you know politicians then that is great, as by now it is pretty common to have plenty of female politicians.

[@PsDnK]

I mean, if they named 100 women that weren't musicians nor streamers, then the women would be 200% slower. Prove me wrong

[@lilycosette]

ok now YOU name 100 women

[@kevinseraphin5456]

he literaly did it in the first video dude...

[@anna-fx7fl]

Tried it myself and managed 8:30 (on my phone), so I feel pretty accomplished now 😅

[@sampower90]

I would be impressed if I was even able to name 100 people in general bro 💀. How are you supposed to remember anybodies name.

[@benrex7775]

I could name more than 100 people in general, but a bunch of them are small youtubers with less than 10'000 subscribers and another bunch would be people I know personally but you can still google them thanks to the "about us" section on their company or university websites. But due to my interest the percentage of women among those people is low.

[@christhis9597]

I dont even think i can name 100people

[@cr0wnoss]

just did it and it took me a little over 20minutes lmao

[@shyampadmanabhan4171]

It looks like this quickly turned into a "Name 100 celebrities" challenge

[@Zanador]

Kinda always was, considering the rules specify that you can't name anyone who isn't easily googleable i.e. a celebrity.

[@g.b.9799]

how else would this challenge work???

[@benrex7775]

@@g.b.9799 historical figures, contributors to science, authors. There are many googleable people who are not celebrities. I could also name a bunch of people who I work for or who were professors at my university. They are googleable, especially if you allow linkedIn. But since streamers took up that challenge it is obvious that celebrities were the most popular people.

[@chrisiscool]

my time was 15:03 so ig not bad???? I did mostly name kpop idols tho

[@ethanrabbitts9906]

I never knew there was that many

[@MissDarknSpooky]

It's so crazy that Hillary Clinton was on the men's lists but not on the women's lists, I wonder why the male streamers more readily named her, while the women named Our former first lady. Kinda interesting!