I miss the Art Deco style of sky scrapers. Yeah glass is cool and all but when every new building is glass it starts to become boring.
@dobitastic04394 жыл бұрын
I never thought anyone actually like how all glass skyscrapers look
@lovelycity15044 жыл бұрын
@@dobitastic0439 They look cool at first, especially when looking at them from far away but after a while the designs get really repetitive.
@fluffysharkdatazz94604 жыл бұрын
Fartbig Smelly i really like Seattle style. It’s dark, black, and sometimes they add these colored streams to them. There’s also a mirror building there that tripped me out. I had no idea it was there until i moved my eyes because its shape bends the light to not focus or look shiny like chrome, but just enough to giver that illusion of real color. But had i not seen that city i probably would consider glass to be boring, and had i not seen cities outside of Seattle the only glass buildings i would see were theirs and also consider it boring. I think Singapore is doing a good job at using its glass while also making nature part of it and making it less about the aesthetic and more so a compliment. But they are transferring to wood skyscrapers anyway. Maybe one day we can look at Singapores modern architecture and consider it influential and get out of this glass addiction.
@graham10344 жыл бұрын
@Jakonate I worked in a 100+ year old art deco "skyscraper" (17 stories) in Vancouver and while the building is beautiful (e.g. had a marble faced stairway that wrapped around the central elevators) it wasn't the best place to work. I had a desk right beside a window and even then the natural lighting wasn't great. Constant maintenance to keep it from falling apart, tIny elevators, etc. So while it's a great looking building, it isn't practical.
@NatureShy4 жыл бұрын
FluffyShark Datazz I agree. I’m from Portland, but I’ve always recognized how beautiful Seattle’s skyline is. It has no doubt the most beautiful skyline in the entire USA, and that isn’t even taking into account the natural beauty (mountains, volcanoes, and water) around it, or the Space Needle adding that unique recognizable feature.
@latrace19864 жыл бұрын
"The father of the skyscraper" referred to Louis Sullivan, the architect, not the building itself
@josiahzimmer31284 жыл бұрын
That building is in St. Louis, MO
@WuvPain4 жыл бұрын
Lol
@WuvPain4 жыл бұрын
I thought the building had children
@imnotbase3 жыл бұрын
Would’ve been cooler if it was the name of the building
@BigCroca3 жыл бұрын
Frankenstein is the scientist not the monster
@Masood18104 жыл бұрын
The London incident where the car melted was due to the shape of the building, not necessarily due to the glass facade. It still has the glass facade even now, but don't melt objects as they've realigned the panels to not concentrate the sun's rays. There is new glass technology that allows to control amount of heating in a building. Heating can also be controlled with good design in ventilation, shadowing, etc. Regular masonry buildings heat up too and release the heat lateron in the night contributing to the heating effect. Here the primary focus was on AC systems using energy. Tall buildings that's aren't made of glass use the same too. Rather than banning glass, each building, based on its size and type of use should be given a target of energy use in pre design phase. Let the owner, architects and engineers design on the material. Don't enforce stupid views.
@deus_ex_machina_4 жыл бұрын
Well argued. I agree that regulation should aim to set forth targets of performance and safety and prevent negative externalities rather that prescribe how those targets are to be met.
@benjaminkho57444 жыл бұрын
I actually agree to this argument.
@planefan0824 жыл бұрын
New tech like “dimmable glass” should be used too.
@makatron4 жыл бұрын
Completely agree mate, focus on the target consumption and let the design team take whichever direction works for them.
@Enafa6664 жыл бұрын
Couldn't have said it better myself
@charleslombard44324 жыл бұрын
I am surprised aesthetic appeal is barely mentioned. Madame Halsband briefly mentions aesthetics but dismisses bricks without real argumentation. Having a good looking building that inspires the people that walk, work, and live around them is one of the most important aspects of architecture.
@campkira4 жыл бұрын
i prefer some green... glass just too 90's// which all those guy come from...
@bana4544 жыл бұрын
Skyscrapers and the appeal is the only reason why i wanna move to a city
@ritwikreddy56704 жыл бұрын
Making a building look good is gping to make it expensive, and investors are not going to like it.
@charleslombard44324 жыл бұрын
@@ritwikreddy5670 I wonder how they managed to make such beautiful buildings pre WW2 while staying profitable.
@ritwikreddy56704 жыл бұрын
@@charleslombard4432 because before the modern industrial production made glass skyscrapers cheaper, everything was expensive and skyscrapers were seen as pride of the country as opposed to cramping large office spaces in small plots and People didn't expect them to be profitable just by commercial space but by a luxury factor, they were statements of wealth kinda like Rolls Royce and people were willing to pay the premium to buy a part of them.
@SupremeLeaderKimJong-un4 жыл бұрын
Pyramid skyscrapers is the way, I have spoken. I mean you just can’t beat the Ryugyong
@aoaoaaoaoao8894 жыл бұрын
Kim Jong-un agreed
@glebsokolov99594 жыл бұрын
Kim Jong-un just ignore those western propaganda idiots
@Scaro.s4 жыл бұрын
Kim Jong-un can’t wait till the insides actually completed
@Sk0lzky4 жыл бұрын
Tbh dude's right. I really like the idea of stepped pyramids with "floating garden" type parks and stuff like that on every level with all the stores and whatnot inside. If you have to take up space and cover the sun at least give people an ability to rest in a place where you can actually see the sky...
@kshitijtiwari34264 жыл бұрын
I find you under every video I watch Kimmy boy
@wintrparkgrl4 жыл бұрын
"no-one builds with brick anymore" :(
@jana314154 жыл бұрын
No
@quizzicalgaming49254 жыл бұрын
There are plenty of brick buildings still being built, but they’ll typically be residential or commercial (small stores), not skyscrapers anymore.
@timbehrens96784 жыл бұрын
Too expensive for any large scale construction. Wasn't a big problem in the past when manual labor was cheap and abundant.
@alaedine21724 жыл бұрын
We build :')
@wolfy19874 жыл бұрын
That infuriated me. I love brick, and most people like brick. They might be getting away from less environmentally friendly buildings, but good Lord they still need to improve the appearance of these buildings.
@lambda65644 жыл бұрын
Maybe just change the architectural style of the towers then. We already had neo-classicist and art deco skyscrapers. They had ornamentation, wich made them prettier anyways. Just having a blank glass box is not really an enjoyable envivroment anyways.
@Sk0lzky4 жыл бұрын
This. The problem is that they're not meant to be enjoyable for us common folk down here. It's for the people that get corner offices so big they can make miniature jungles inside. Also why are hanging gardens still not a basic concern of architects, I'm far from an ecoterrorist but plants just make everything so much better
@sanjaymatsuda45044 жыл бұрын
@@Sk0lzky Plants attract bugs, bugs attract wildlife, wildlife poops all over the place and transmits disease and gets stuck in the least convenient crevices. Gardening above ground level is kind of expensive.
@thekoalakingdomshow63194 жыл бұрын
@@sanjaymatsuda4504 is there no parks, lawns, trees, and green areas in your city? No one catches diseases from plants or...bees i guess? That plants attract to them. And the most common wild life is angry geese and ducks.
@Ahzealion4 жыл бұрын
@Lambda I'm from seattle, and some of the new amazon HQ sky scrapers down here have these colorful decorations on the side of each glass panel that combined the pretty reflective glass create a super cool look. I'd recommend checking some of it out on good maps. (Specifically areound the amazon spheres in seattle)
@Sk0lzky4 жыл бұрын
@@sanjaymatsuda4504 we have elevators now
@user-vn7ce5ig1z4 жыл бұрын
0:12 - The worst part is that the architect, Rafael Viñoly had created the exact same concave-mirror-torch problem six years earlier with the Vdara in Las Vegas. He learned nothing. 🤦 I'm amazed anyone still hires him. 😒
@donnk4 жыл бұрын
not to mention the building looks ugly AF....
@pedroSilesia4 жыл бұрын
bullshit. It is well documented that Vinoly said that his design was so many times changed by the developer he stated this is not his design anymore. I was in Walkie Talkie multiple times it is a great building with massive garden and viewing platform but obviously with some design problems.
@JohnMoseley4 жыл бұрын
@@pedroSilesia It's widely loathed, though, so Vinoly could possibly just be trying to cover his arse, poor bastard.
@MatthewCaban4 жыл бұрын
That's what I thought of when hearing that. Think it comes down to more of the design and utilizing new solutions rather than dictating building materials. Promote the goal not how to achieve it
@maugustyniak4 жыл бұрын
He must have a winning, sunny dispostion.
@Otter-Destruction4 жыл бұрын
Definitely love the new trend in NYC, these class buildings are so boring on the skyline, they're just blue and with a couple of LEDs and the architects think it looks appealing. The new copper and stone buildings are much better in terms of aesthetic appeal. It returns us back to the good ol' days of Art Deco.
@joseg.castillo12734 жыл бұрын
As an architecture student, they have thought us about how inefficient glass facades are IDK why people keep building glass skyscrapers. Edit: There are ways to shade the glass. So it’s more efficient in terms of lighting and thermodynamics. So don’t get all upset at my comment. I guess I should clarify that there is also ways to insulate the glass and ways of creating thermal breaks to avoid thermal bridges in the facade. The problem is that the demand is too low therefore the production of such design elements is expensive. Anyone with credentials, feel free to clarify or disprove my point.
@andyb23394 жыл бұрын
I'm moving to a big city soon and one of the benefits I see is maximizing light when only a small fraction of your wall space is facing the exterior. In my current apartment I have windows in 3 directions, but in a large apartment complex only 1 wall faces outward. This can cause units to feel dark and restricted. I do see the benefits of lower glass use though. At my work we frequently obscure our beautiful view with curtains due to excessive sunlight.
@kazedcat4 жыл бұрын
Glass is cheap. It is strong fireproof material that is heavily mass produce. Also installing large glass panels is very fast and easy. So really if not glass constructors will just switch to large metal panels or plywood. Imagine a tall skyscraper clad in plywood.
@livethefuture24924 жыл бұрын
the Burj khalifa is glass. so clearly glass has something to it...
@augustovasconcellos71734 жыл бұрын
Because glass is cheap and building with anything other than glass is seen as "pastiching" older styles, which is a big no-no in the architectural world
@limeyprat4 жыл бұрын
@@livethefuture2492 Still an ugly building.
@macprice7774 жыл бұрын
Them pesky deadly killscrapers.
@lordraj3654 жыл бұрын
😂😂
@michaelesposito26294 жыл бұрын
Eh. They are only deadly if you’re alive
@israelmendoza44354 жыл бұрын
Bruh
@SirLucian4 жыл бұрын
Glass buildings have temperature problems. Yo have you ever heard of greenhouse?
@lynxb83004 жыл бұрын
you know how green house works?
@palody_en-ja4 жыл бұрын
Yeah, it gets crazy hot. They should call it the greenhouse problem, or effect, something like that
@ruoyan98634 жыл бұрын
Greenhouse effect is something else it’s basic climate change and global warming basically how it’s happening so yeah Free info here!
@michaelkelly73793 жыл бұрын
@@ruoyan9863 Your attempt to sound intellectually superior without even taking a moment to google and realize that a green house is an actual (common) thing is pretty hilarious.
@ncuco3 жыл бұрын
@@michaelkelly7379 was gonna say exactly this. Didn't know people weren't aware of what a greenhouse is. And that it is called greenhouse effect because... Of greenhouses 🤔*mindblown*? lol
@Chrischi45984 жыл бұрын
My precious.... : me while I play cities Skylines and now fear for my glass and lights skyline
@weareorigin4 жыл бұрын
Get the don't melt my car mod. I love building a city of endless skyscrapers 🤣
@chickeninabox4 жыл бұрын
More IT Districts!
@alexevert54574 жыл бұрын
As someone who works for a glassmaking company, I don't like this.
@JonJon-du9ne3 жыл бұрын
Get a job fixing belt buckles
@jheanelltabana87133 жыл бұрын
The window washers too I bet. But the buildings will still have windows for you guys.
@leogobbi104 жыл бұрын
I heard that when the IBM building in Rio de Janeiro was been finished a few years ago, they’ve installed the glass facade before the a/c system, and the result was that the workers couldn’t work anymore because of the temperature inside it
@timpauwels37344 жыл бұрын
When high rise building started in the Netherlands (outside Rotterdam, which already had a lot of towers) some 15 years ago, many were built with brick facades. Recently I have even seen some new taller buildings being built in a style reminiscent of 1890s/1900s American high rise. Brick is not out of fashion everywhere! Then again, in the Netherlands even the roads are brick...
@xavierdomenico3 жыл бұрын
Yes I’m happy because traditional architecture is becoming more in demand
@anthonydelfino61714 жыл бұрын
The problem with the skyscraper you talked about in London isn't that it's glass. It's that it was made of a reflective material and has a bowed surface that is able to concentrate the light it reflects, similar to a magnifying glass. If the building had flat sides, as the vast majority of skycrapers do, then the melting car would not have happened.
@mermaidman70694 жыл бұрын
Today: glass is bad, wood is good and eco friendly plus brick is old fashion. 40 years later: Reports coming in of massive fires from many skyscrapers and invasions of cockroaches dubbed by many as "office roaches".
@r3d0c4 жыл бұрын
those wood panels for construction are treated for fire, they might even be more resistant to fire damage than steel; the people who build those buildings are much smarter than the common moron on youtube and much more aware of the challenges that face them
@mermaidman70694 жыл бұрын
@@r3d0c right, like they predicted glass would reflect sun heat and cost a ton to keep buildings cool?
@andyb23394 жыл бұрын
@@r3d0c I talked to an expert lumber dealer once and they mentioned rot as another potential problem with CLT construction. I think wooden skyscrapers would be awesome but they are still experimental.
@andyb23394 жыл бұрын
@@mermaidman7069 It's fascinating to see how these technologies shift in hindsight! I'm excited by massive wooden construction but applaud your skepticism :)
@fjellyo32614 жыл бұрын
They should put greenery on the roof and façade.
@MythicalFable4 жыл бұрын
Did anyone notice at 5:58 the dude was about to stab his cooler?
@EllTheBob4 жыл бұрын
Aditl they were just cooling their knife off!
@user-vl8bv5jt9m4 жыл бұрын
Or breaking ice
@MichaelRockfez4 жыл бұрын
Cold-blooded murder
@oiltoast37234 жыл бұрын
@@MichaelRockfez Ice hearted.
@shiva_6894 жыл бұрын
Lmao
@breakingborders4 жыл бұрын
That’s why I love my brick building. Don’t have heating or AC. The brick keeps my place nice all year :)
@njott10214 жыл бұрын
Yeaaa climate is an enormous part of that, not just the brick..
@jiujitsuboxer4 жыл бұрын
My first home was brick and it was drafty as hell.
@breakingborders4 жыл бұрын
Weather plays a big part, of course, but I bet most buildings in my city have climate control.
@KarimElhoussami4 жыл бұрын
@Phillipenis Barbalooch Same here in London
@jamesharden3timedpoy4664 жыл бұрын
I live in a brick house in Houston and no you need a AC if you want to survive
@oberonoberon92884 жыл бұрын
I remember when glass was tauthe as Eco-friendly. Because huge glass front + insolation => huge reduction in heating costs. (which was the largest concern back then) Ideally (at least when i learned mechanical engineering/building) you want is a window that lets in as much sun as possible during the winter, and less during summer. A static approach for this is an overhang (since the suns path is lower during the winter.), dynamic are movable blinds.
@Alimanggo3 жыл бұрын
0:00 never have i seen a map so detailed yet simple
@TheCaptainSplatter4 жыл бұрын
The ban on all glass skyscrapers also killed the super skinny skyscrapers as a result. Also I imagine any new buildings currently under construction can finish with their all glass design. But not new buildings.
@benjaminkho57444 жыл бұрын
I know helping the environment is a Important but I think people are slowly forgetting that asthetics is a major part of a building , nice looking buildings are motivating for people and really shows the amazing engineering of humans.
@uniqhnd234 жыл бұрын
Just put some curtains on them Edit: Oh wow they actually do that haha
@davejohn36004 жыл бұрын
I used to work making eye glasses. I wonder if any of the technology used in that industry would help? Transition, UV, and AR coating for example. I know AR coating was expensive for glasses though. I have seen someone made windows that have adjustable tinting by remote.
@AnthonyBrusca4 жыл бұрын
I bet it would but seeing the price of those technologies on small eyeglasses makes me cringe at what the price would be on large skyscrapers
@davejohn36004 жыл бұрын
@@AnthonyBrusca Possibly but I used to do AR coating. A lot of it got waisted because you were doing a bunch of little lenses. Large sheets would be cheaper per volume at least.
@AnthonyBrusca4 жыл бұрын
@@davejohn3600 I'm sure there could be more crude coatings that can be scaled.
@Bob_Lob_Law4 жыл бұрын
The adjustable electronic tinting will save incredible amounts of energy, however it is currently still prohibitively expensive.
@livethefuture24924 жыл бұрын
i'm pretty sure glass panes are designed to be reflective and already have that coating.
@Mister__Jey3 жыл бұрын
You could replace roughly every second glass element with a solar panel. That would not only look very cool, it would also produce energy and thus of course prevent the buildings from heating up so extremely
@thegalacticgalaxy20784 жыл бұрын
One of the reasons I like Europe so much is because most of their cities aren’t steel/glass mazes
@10gamer644 жыл бұрын
yes
@konradklukowski10094 жыл бұрын
I disagree. Most cities in Europe are old,ugly and braking down. For example In Warsaw most stuff is old and gross, whit occasional Skyscraper or good looking apartment buildings. Stone and brick are outdated and are not the way to go
@thegalacticgalaxy20784 жыл бұрын
Sirscorpiok20 fair enough I guess. I was referring more to Western Europe though
@andresvillanueva54214 жыл бұрын
@@konradklukowski1009 Western European architecture looks beautiful.
@greaterbritannia57454 жыл бұрын
Where I live we have a skyscraper and since construction started, 2 glass panels have fallen off You get hit on the head by one of them and u ded
@thomasbarlow42234 жыл бұрын
Thats pretty scary
@greaterbritannia57454 жыл бұрын
Each panel is between 5-10 inches thick
@livethefuture24924 жыл бұрын
yeah like brick and wood buildings would protect you...
@chrisjohn954 жыл бұрын
those new Wood Skyscrapers makes me think about Minecraft Griefing by Flint and Steel
@startrek03364 жыл бұрын
Wood is actually more resistent to fire than steel at a certain degree.
@anbuvelsankar4 жыл бұрын
After 3 years News channels: Amazon forest disappeared
@nathanjohnpalaogaming48724 жыл бұрын
@@anbuvelsankar no-
@Mae_Dastardly3 жыл бұрын
@@anbuvelsankar amazon isnt bein deforested for lumber ya silly goose its getting cleared for farmland. Most wood in construction is plantation pine.
@anbuvelsankar3 жыл бұрын
@@Mae_Dastardly have you ever heard about joke?
@luisescamadonhamue41174 жыл бұрын
I didnt know there was sunshine in london
@deus_ex_machina_4 жыл бұрын
The architect didn't know either. That's why he designed a parabolic mirror /s
@thatmarchingarrow3 жыл бұрын
There is, but only if you don't want it to be there
@brooke83624 жыл бұрын
The best skyscrapers have plants growing on the sides though, you can’t tell me that doesn’t look sick
@augustsiverskog24584 жыл бұрын
That is noice👌
@adiabd14 жыл бұрын
It has its own drawbacks, especially the water distribution and growth control
@martaborkowska81684 жыл бұрын
And brings the temperatures down! Vertical gardens are actually a great AC system!
@sanjaymatsuda45044 жыл бұрын
@@martaborkowska8168 Plants have a cooling effect if you live directly underneath them, however the effect is not scalable to skyscrapers: if you want the shade to do most of the cooling, you have to completely cover the south-, east- and west-facing sides of the building with plants. That can get expensive. Then you have to deal with the moisture problem: the evaporation gives you air that is slightly cooler than ambient, but full of water, and that's no good for electronics, perishable goods, paper, metal, basically anything except plants and earthware. So maybe you dehumidify the air: then it's air conditioning with extra steps, extra bugs, and a lot more bird poop and dead rats.
@neenimee4 жыл бұрын
Yes! I'd have loved some info on garden opportunities, especially using the "glassier" parts for growing edible vegetables. Also, I heard a while back about solar conversing glass panels that are still see through, but otherwise work as normal solar panels.
@sohopedeco4 жыл бұрын
I know there are always suicide concerns, but I find it so much more pleasant to have a window I can open wide.
@leeriches88413 жыл бұрын
Totally. I used to live on 14th floor of a residential tower and I would have felt so claustrophobic without being able to open the windows. All the hallways had locked windows though.
@juanalbichu3 жыл бұрын
Cheddar has taken 2021 by storm
@phillylove72904 жыл бұрын
Architect- look at my wood skyscraper, it's renewable!!! *Surrounding glass sky scrapers reflect super ray's onto wood....
@sadiqahmed41434 жыл бұрын
Wood skyscraper = ahh I am burning Glass skyscraper= sorry it's. Just my body
@AverytheCubanAmerican4 жыл бұрын
A fried egg turns it into an eggscellent street
@aoaoaaoaoao8894 жыл бұрын
ur a Cuban American
@zaidshah34674 жыл бұрын
@truck-king 78 wut
@theenzoferrari4584 жыл бұрын
Newegg is that you?
@theenzoferrari4584 жыл бұрын
@truck-king 78 buh?
@kxm78024 жыл бұрын
Maria Rai same
@RealMattHaney4 жыл бұрын
Can you please do a video on how much crowding skyscrapers add and the effect on people’s health (besides blocking out the sun) vs non-tall cities (ie European cities that were established before skyscrapers became a thing)?
@elizabeth555johnson4 жыл бұрын
The narration (Antonella?) was outstanding! I appreciate you clear, non-affected delivery.
@antonellacrescimbeni93154 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much Elizabeth!!
@Liusila4 жыл бұрын
I grew up in a small crappy town so I adore the glistening skyscraper skyline of central London. And wood for office space! I don't want to work in a matchbox from the 70s!
@Justin.Martyr4 жыл бұрын
*Lots of Pretty, but dumb, but Nice Ladies come from small Crapy Towns!!!!*
@iambestever4 жыл бұрын
Excellent content backed up with reputable sources and interviews to boot. Keep it up guys.
@Saiyukimot4 жыл бұрын
2nd video in a row that is 10.01 long.......we notice.
@hemangkeswani4 жыл бұрын
Maybe _you_ do...
@vrantschesko19124 жыл бұрын
Videos don't need to be over 10 Minutes for them to add additional ads anymore. It was changed to ~8Minutes a few weeks ago.
@ville72134 жыл бұрын
its hardly a bad thing, they get paid more. They need to pay the bills bro, you get free videos.
@vrantschesko19124 жыл бұрын
@Phillipenis Barbalooch .
@ville72134 жыл бұрын
@Phillipenis Barbalooch how so? I really don't get it. Unless they massively compromise the video I don't see why you would ever care. They make more money which possibly even helps them make more and better videos which you get to watch. It is unbelievable to me that people complain about this. Let's say they make the video 30 seconds longer than otherwise, who fucking cares? You are so entitled its tragic.
@stafonvoncamron3 жыл бұрын
Glass can be energy efficient if its uv protected and double/triple pane.
@GeographyWorld4 жыл бұрын
0:00 Why is Ireland there? We are a free, independent country.
@AndrewGeierMelons4 жыл бұрын
I don't know, but I think it looks better unified.... And people just really aren't ready for a UK without Ireland to make GB look less ugly
@jadenmolloy48304 жыл бұрын
Noone said you're not. It was just talking about London... what was the point of including anything beside London? To make it look pretty I guess. I cant imagine this channel was trying to make any geopolitical statements on the independence of certain countries... I think you're just looking for something to get wound up about.
@kamX-rz4uy4 жыл бұрын
British Isles, not the UK.
@gempai-o5u4 жыл бұрын
kam2244 X the term British Isles is not recognised in Ireland
@genghisthegreat20344 жыл бұрын
It's a bloody cheek to include Ireland 🇮🇪 in your map. Separate, sovereign country where high rise glass fronted construction is not a factor, at all.
@1joshjosh14 жыл бұрын
I live in Calgary where we have many skyscrapers in comparison to our population. Every building in the last 10 years has been boring glass. They used to use things like granite and stuff but that's too expensive.
@lgdsyugdsfhj42804 жыл бұрын
One thing they forgot to mention. Even with all of the improvements in glass. The best window is worst than a Code minimum wall for insulating a building. 40% glass should be the most amount of glass in a typical office building. When you go past that everyone sitting near the window is uncomfortable, even with the oversized HVAC system to handle all of that glass. I'd recommend 30% glass for walls. plenty of views, daylight, and comfort.
@MrBibi862 жыл бұрын
*I couldn't live without aircon in the summer here in Australia*
@EBProductions4 жыл бұрын
Glass skyscrapers are a thorn in everyones eye. We should go back to actual beautifull architecture
@molly.dog8brooke7924 жыл бұрын
Yeah, recreate the old buildings with statues and decorations around the edges. Grand and breath taking. Go back to stone or brick for houses and smaller buildings. In my area there’s a mix of modern houses mixed with houses made out of old local stone. The stone buildings are beautiful and fit into the landscape much better. In cities, brick may work better, but it would still look nice.
@LEFT4BASS4 жыл бұрын
I don’t mind them aesthetically. I just wish there was more variety.
@UltimateAlgorithm4 жыл бұрын
Glass looks lean and clean. Old architecture feels bulky and oppressive. Although you need combination of these to make a city that feels vibrant.
@livethefuture24924 жыл бұрын
i think the Burj Khalifa looks rather impressive! ;)
@jensenraylight80114 жыл бұрын
Glass skyscrapper is so yesterday, let's build a skyscrapper using lego
@sonarmik12304 жыл бұрын
Eh can’t wait for there to be a full wooden buildings
@Mike-7394 жыл бұрын
Yea, same (But seriously, imagine how weak it would be)
@Lopaaz4 жыл бұрын
@@Mike-739 9/11 attacks planned intensives
@Sk0lzky4 жыл бұрын
Meanwhile in bamboo composite manufacturers' board meetings: See this man on youtube? Find him. Protect him. Pay for his architecture studies. We cannot fail.
@Mike-7394 жыл бұрын
RealEdibleOnion compared to for example steel buildings
@sanjaymatsuda45044 жыл бұрын
@@Mike-739 Look up cross-laminated timber. It's fire retardant even before any treatment, it captures carbon rather than releasing it, and it's stronger than concrete by weight.
@RedheadLady Жыл бұрын
They really didn’t think about the placement of some of them. The shard is the one that kills me. Placed right over a terminal London train station. A giant sun reflector which does blind train drivers heading into the station. It’s not like it’s only at certain angles. It’s a straight run towards the shard. I do like the light show they do at the top of it in the night every now and then.
@chump39474 жыл бұрын
Architects always seem to be 20 years behind the times. It's 2020 and 99% of architects can't even design a cost affective house, that doesn't require airconditioning. Can I have a piece of paper and a structural engineer?
@agisler874 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure architects are to blame but the people paying to have the buildings designed and built. New houses are built to be cheapest as possible rather than energy efficient. They are more energy efficient than 30+ year old houses but can still be improved a lot. IMO we would be better having houses cost $30k - $50k more to have high energy efficiency than pushing solar on every new roof.
@petrapewpew4 жыл бұрын
Funny you say that, I'm going to architecture school to do exactly this. Time for a rehaul of our buildings and communities
@Joesolo134 жыл бұрын
Engineers and Architects can do that easily The problem is, people want what they want, and they often want things that aren't efficient.
@AUTISTICLYCAN2 жыл бұрын
I LOVE GLASS SKYSCRAPERS PERIOD... NO REMORSE!
@gamer148324 жыл бұрын
I work in the window industry and I think banning glass skyscrapers is a bad idea. This totally ignores the innovations that have taken place in the glazing industry to make windows vastly more efficient. I would not doubt that in 20 years we will be building with glass again using a technology that already exists, but is currently too expensive to be economically viable--Vacuum insulated glass. Vacuum insulated glass is when you have two pieces of glass with a void in the middle that would normally contain air, but instead contains literally nothing (vacuum). This type of glass is extremely energy efficient and if you combine that technology with coatings that already exist, you can reduce the heating and cooling requirements for an all glass building dramatically. So to circle back to my original point, it's kind of silly to ban the use of a particular type of building material, just raise the bar for the energy efficiency that you require to meet NYC building codes.
@asdkotable4 жыл бұрын
My favorite building in the city of Montreal is the Sun Life Building, which has a white stone facade. Glass towers can be beautiful, but we can't go wrong with some variety in materials and design.
@MildMisanthropeMaybeMassive4 жыл бұрын
I appreciate the Jurassic Park reference behind Mark Chambers.
@gidlesbird78204 жыл бұрын
Reaching for 10 mins arnt we
@gman830904 жыл бұрын
We are lucky because in Victoria we’ve got the first environmentally friendly shopping centre it’s called the Burwood brickworks and it’s all environmentally friendly
@JRodizAwesome4 жыл бұрын
Hear me out... You can have your glass curtain wall skyscrapers, just cover them in cool parametric facades to provide both shade and aesthetic appeal.
@rerun32833 жыл бұрын
I liked the hand gestures in front of the little model. I've never seen that in 20 years of designing buildings.
@olbradley4 жыл бұрын
Remind me, what happened last time a large city (Chicago) decided to make all of its infrastructure out of wood?
@keeganharris1864 жыл бұрын
Yeah but the Chicago fire was a special case. I mean today you don’t see news of every large town in America burning down. Today we have better fire departments and the materials are treated to be fire resistant.
@swagwanpiffting87964 жыл бұрын
Don't forget about half of London burning
@BeefyWalrus4 жыл бұрын
Cross laminated timber is specially treated to be mostly fire resistant. Supposedly, the worst that will happen during a fire is it will char and lose a little bit of weight, but that is about it. Research has found that CLT is just as if not more resistant to seismic activity than steel and, because it's wood, it absorbs CO2 like (similarly to trees), which can actually help the environment. It is no longer a question of "if" as much as it is a question of "when" CLT will become popular.
@pedroSilesia4 жыл бұрын
Few points raised here are very very stretched and data manipulated. 1. Walkie Talkie melted that car not because of the glass but because of the design of the building's south side. 2. Glass cladding that is used in all skyscrapers is very energy efficient and well insulates interior of the building from heat or cold. 3. Acs unit is increasing because number of new buildings around the world increasing not because buildings are getting warmer.
@fundanitin69004 жыл бұрын
Somehow I believe- new innovations like - Solar Glass and new ways to produce green energy is more viable and practical solution than just doing politics on it and doing nothing solid . 🙏
@sbernhard834 жыл бұрын
You should do more research about building science. The reason your house stays a fairly consistent temperature is mostly due to air sealing and insulation, both things that have been improving over time by changing the building codes. It’s not politics, it’s science. There are decades of improvements to building science that could be better applied to sky scrapers. It doesn’t require some future invention like “solar glass”.
@stormysamreen70624 жыл бұрын
6:43 But the main problem with wood is deforestation. Building a whole skyscraper, even one, will require thousands of acres of forest to be cleared, and that will surely be a more significant hit to the ecosystem than any amount of glass.
@JuanCarlosNeria4 жыл бұрын
Not really, look up for CLT, it’s laminated timber made with 3 year old farmed trees, quite promising.
@AdamSmith-gs2dv4 жыл бұрын
@@JuanCarlosNeria That means its pine aka crap wood. Want to know the trees that always fall over in my neighborhood? Pine. Want to know the trees that constantly catch fire in the west? Pine again. So unless you want skyscrapers falling over or catching fire we will still need concrete and steel
@michaelr12864 жыл бұрын
Also, glass buildings kill tens of thousands of birds every year.
@lucasvanvuuren56194 жыл бұрын
you mean they destroy tens of thousands of government surveillance drones every year.
@akoiya63004 жыл бұрын
Too much Windex
@tanveer33844 жыл бұрын
Give reference
@michaelr12864 жыл бұрын
@@tanveer3384 Hi, try this link. www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/apr/07/how-many-birds-killed-by-skyscrapers-american-cities-report
@michaelr12864 жыл бұрын
@@tanveer3384can also Google "glass buildings kill birds" for lots of articles about it.
@fififinance74694 жыл бұрын
Newbie to YT. Instructional videos are so helpful and informative when there is so much to learn. Thank you!👍👍
@djchinchula4 жыл бұрын
Hmmm Y don’t engineers and scientists make solar glass so glass skyscrapers scrapers instead of reflecting the sun we absorb its energy it will benefit ALOT
@wilsoncg4 жыл бұрын
You should do a follow up video on the Bloomberg building in London, it has some interesting features which use natural airflow to reduce energy consumption for AC. The downside however is that these custom features required specialized materials to be produced offsite, some argue that the raw materials (stone & bronze) greatly increase the carbon footprint of the building due to production and transport.
@cheungch19904 жыл бұрын
"YOU DIDN'T SAY THE MAGIC WORD!"
@fjellyo32614 жыл бұрын
China?
@hermask8154 жыл бұрын
Please!
@AJ-xm4xc4 жыл бұрын
Build skyscraper with glass facade. Install blinds to block out sunlight. Install fluorescent lights because it’s too dark inside.
@GeekyMedia4 жыл бұрын
"No one builds with bricks"... *New London Vernacular has entered the room*
@yilmanbabilonia4 жыл бұрын
In some part of NYC there are no shadows anymore. The sun hits you from there back and the glass building hits you from the from... It sucks in the summer.
@utubemally4 жыл бұрын
also, the average lifespan of a glass skyscraper is 30-50 years, so they are incredibly non-sustainable, unlike stone structures that last a millennium.
@myreadingmapped4 жыл бұрын
This video is a great reason why commercial visibly transparent roller shade systems with computerized control provide high building and worker performance. The shades help reduce the size of the chiller needed to cool the building, reduce its fossil fuel consumption, reduce the solar heat build up on objects in the room, reduce the contrast problem on computer screens, increase personal comfort, reduce eye strain due to brightness and glare, and aide in worker productivity increases. All while allowing views of the outdoors and daylighting to impact the psychological aspects of the indoor working environment. Especially when those energy efficient dark green and blue glass systems allow as much light in as clear glass.
@CZsWorld4 жыл бұрын
They obviously never saw The Dark Knight.
@imcarlosjr48984 жыл бұрын
CZsWorld ikr
@alphaxion4 жыл бұрын
Leeds had a great glass-alternative tower built in 2008/2009 called Broadcasting Tower, even winning an award for its quality back in 2010. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadcasting_Tower,_Leeds
@girlsdrinkfeck4 жыл бұрын
looks fugly YUCK
@wolfy19874 жыл бұрын
Lol, still hideous though
@Werbespanner4 жыл бұрын
YIKES
@Chichi-sl2mq4 жыл бұрын
please educate me.....how does the use of wood ...as in wood ....(deforestation) become sustainable...............
@keeganharris1864 жыл бұрын
Because you replant the forests
@trinidad174 жыл бұрын
Sustainable in that context just means that is in fashion for people that like to feel superior by pretending to care about the environment. Said that, wood is a 100% renewable resource. The problem is building a huge structure out of it that is destroying that parcel of land certainly pollution in of itself.
@j-bird17784 жыл бұрын
I like how frying an egg on the sidewalk is a novelty. That's possible in your car where I live.
@AluminumOxide4 жыл бұрын
The WTC twin towers were mostly clad in metal : lots of glass was objected due to the architect’s fear of heights
@JohnnyArtPavlou3 жыл бұрын
I have a feeling there’s more to the story than that. The exterior walls of the World Trade Center were structural. Which makes them different than many buildings that employ a “curtainwall.“
@ralphchery99674 жыл бұрын
On 5:56 we can clearly see some 🇭🇹 Prestige beers and some séjourné Water bottles. But why blur them? Do you have a policy on not showing product brands in your videos
@starwarfan83424 жыл бұрын
Can we just replace all that glass with solar panels?
@iwrotethis47124 жыл бұрын
We need daylight
@khagemann74624 жыл бұрын
How about one pice glass and the next is a solar panel and repeat
@rylpace4 жыл бұрын
Solar panels need to face the sun as directly as possible to be efficient, placing them vertical would be a waste of panels. On top of the less than ideal angle, Skyscrapers often shade each other, and at least 2 sides aren't facing the sun at all at any given time. Better off using those solar panels where they can more efficiently provide for the power needs of a glass structure
@livethefuture24924 жыл бұрын
there is research into solar glass. tesla's working on a solar roof.
@lucasgog4 жыл бұрын
The actual first tower with a glass curtain is the Gustavo Capanema Palace (Ministry of Education and Health Building) from 1943 in Rio de Janeiro. Both projects are Niemeyer's with the collaboration of Le Corbusier.
@Feynman9814 жыл бұрын
Then stop building identity-robbed hamster cages at all!
@ritwikreddy56704 жыл бұрын
Then be ready to pay more for the area.
@Feynman9814 жыл бұрын
@@ritwikreddy5670 There is no area without hamster-cages anymore. They build them now even in the middle of most classy neighborhoods because some entities want to maximize their profits. What happens? Long building times annoy everyone around and the utterly ugly buildings drag down prices for all other houses around. Those get sold, more hamster cages get built. In the end, there's not that much of aesthetic quality of your surrounding left anymore. And green areas around those cages are built to be uncomfortable to avoid anyone using them extensively. High-pay tenants move out. Criminality starts to rise. The downward spiral keeps turning. Building anything is always a trade between taking (natural) space from the public and giving (artificial) space back. If you take beauty and give beauty, the deal is fair. Nowadays many just take beauty and don't give any in return because of incomplete profitability calculation on paper. That's cheating and unsustainable. Therefore banning hamster-cages is in some countries is already a thing to force builders to fulfill their part of the social contract. Take space and give something good and uplifting back. For a better living for everyone.
@ritwikreddy56704 жыл бұрын
@@Feynman981 wait until they replace glass with some opaque material and people will protest that the glass buildings were beautiful and new building are ugly. It's a cycle and nobody can satisfy everyone.
@Feynman9814 жыл бұрын
@@ritwikreddy5670 Nobody really cries if governments tear down buildings from the Brutalistic era. But look what happens if they attempt the same to a Renaissance Building. In the end it's called taste. People have a natural instinct for aesthetitcs. Glas by the way is seen quite aesthetic from many because it reflects the sky and changes color. On the other hand those concrete-framed windows which look and feel like hamster cages are instantly hated by most because they violate all rules of aesthetics directly.
@ritwikreddy56704 жыл бұрын
@@Feynman981 from what I'm gathering, you want beautiful and expensive homes in the city. That's what they did in Hudson yards and people are calling it playground for the rich.
@AB-qo2xq4 жыл бұрын
4:51 what building is this please? it looks spectacular
@Werbespanner4 жыл бұрын
I think it's the London City Hall
@nelhuiliztli29264 жыл бұрын
I miss regionals architecture, styles that belongs to certain countries or places, they pop out more.
@cactus37964 жыл бұрын
actually the first building to use modern skyscraper technology was the *Oriel Chambers* building in the 1860's 1:23
@tescomealdeals46134 жыл бұрын
Lucky for you, Tesco won’t melt your car.
@majkl48014 жыл бұрын
penny market as well
@tescomealdeals46134 жыл бұрын
Don’t speak of such things
@tescomealdeals46134 жыл бұрын
They burn all cars
@majkl48014 жыл бұрын
i like hot dogs
@frenchjr254 жыл бұрын
The explosion in Lebanon shows how dangerous glass buildings can be. All that flying glass caused serious injuries, aside from the injuries caused by the explosion itself.
@michaelarrington86294 жыл бұрын
Triple pane glass can have an R value of 10. All I heard was a lot of anecdotal opinions, no figures.
@VictoriousGardenosaurus4 жыл бұрын
For real, no discussion on spandrel, sunshades or other architectural options. I live in the Southwest where reducing cooling costs is imperative
@camadams91493 жыл бұрын
8:12 Sounds like you just need thin films on the glass instead of a ban. You can modify the thermal and optical properties of glass 7 ways to Sunday with films and chemical treatments. Just look at transition lenses. They go from clear to black based on sunlight
@donotlike4anonymus5944 жыл бұрын
BTW Cheddar u might wanna checked about you're sub's i'm pretty sure I was subscribed before and now I'm not... KZbin often seems to unsubscribe me from "controversial" channels like China uncensored for example where I've been unsubscribed more then a few times ... I often watch videos lived out and then open my phone and like/....
@tanveer33844 жыл бұрын
Glass skyscraper made Western megacities amazing. Love from Bangladesh 🇧🇩
@didierpuzenat72803 жыл бұрын
Bangladesh is very exposed to climate change, especially water level rising because of ice melting and oceans dilatation. And glass skyscrapers are definitively not helping.
@tanveer33843 жыл бұрын
@@didierpuzenat7280 True indeed. Climate change will make our life horrible, for instance, Today is April 27. Last year we got 5 rain at this time. This year there has none. Last year highest temperature was 36°C, this year 42°C. We can't imagine what our life will be within next 50 years. Bangladesh is at High risk. Pray for us brother
@Peizxcv4 жыл бұрын
Come on, de Blasio is famous for flip-flopping and don't have real polices
@lucasdomakoski4 жыл бұрын
This video looks like an ad for that idiot de Blasio
@trinidad174 жыл бұрын
He does have a policy, do whatever it favors him and his friends. It doesn't necessarily involve telling the truth, that's just your misunderstanding.
@cosmo99254 жыл бұрын
I think architecture has lost its heart, you can look back at all of the beautiful cities that were built back in the day and they seem so much more interesting. Think of the Art Deco style of NYC, or London or Paris in the 1800’s, Roman/Greek architecture, oriental architecture from a few centuries ago, Spanish architecture in Mexico, cathedrals and mosques all across Europe and the Middle East. What happened to culturally unique architecture? Everything looks samey now. You can go anywhere in the world that’s at least semi-developed and see a glass skyscraper. Architecture used to be a symbol of a country/culture’s achievements, and they were proud of it. I wish people went back to creating culturally unique buildings, gives a society something to be proud of.
@TheGreatGopib4 жыл бұрын
Did this woman just say wood sky scraper I swear she finna be the exact one to pass out w the kettle on and bun te whole ting down
@emedicao15034 жыл бұрын
This topic has been on the table for many years now. And the tech is really advanced by now , but still has to go an extra mile.
@BradThePitts4 жыл бұрын
Read up on Oakwood Tower in London.
@mog75014 жыл бұрын
I predict this video will be just informational enough to kinda explain the history of glass towers, but then poses a lot more questions regarding building glass towers that are left unanswered. Then the video will explain the current problem with them, but not clearly enough to see why we have to remove them, nor will we see good examples of solutions/ replacements to the glass towers. That's my experience with Cheddar currently
@WalkerReddignton4 жыл бұрын
Also the more glass we use is the less sand we have to work with so we are probably use more sand to make glass that is actually made
@sanjaymatsuda45044 жыл бұрын
The world will never run out of sand (except the specific kind of sand needed to make concrete: that one is in fact running out already). There are whole deserts full of it, and weathering processes produce millions of tons more every other week. And at any rate, if it should run out, glass can be ground to make a very decent substitute for sand.
@Cumulo94 жыл бұрын
@@sanjaymatsuda4504 under socialism, even sand becomes scarce (Milton Friedman)
@destructoau75263 жыл бұрын
I completed an install an clean of a 200m 6 star green rated building 3 years ago. The sun facing curtain wall was 56mm thick DGU’s to repel the sun
@TigerPrawn_4 жыл бұрын
5 seconds in and already they're mispronouncing things😂
@crazy808ish4 жыл бұрын
Regional difference: www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/jaguar Check how it's pronounced in the US vs the UK.
@furfoxsake11754 жыл бұрын
Congrats, your comment is the equivalent of Americans saying "centre" is "center" spelt wrong.
@ewthmatth3 жыл бұрын
The word "jaguar" is borrowed from Spanish. The American pronunciation of "jaguar" is much closer to the Spanish pronunciation. (yes, I'm aware that the word originally came from an indigenous American language)
@eugenetrollip7514 жыл бұрын
in South Africa, part of the design documentation to be submitted for building approval, are the energy efficiency calculations for fenestrations in the building.