How Houses Could Float

[@AlexanderTurke]

The effects of the downturn are beginning to sink in. People are being impacted by the long-term decline in property prices and the housing market. I recently sold my house in the Sacramento area, and I want to invest my lump-sum profit in the stock market before prices start to rise again. Is now the right moment to buy, or not?

[@ArthurLedgeeer]

Stocks with yields that outperform the market should be on your radar, as should shares that at least lag the market over the long term. But if you want a long-term strategy that works, I advise you to consult a broker or financial advisor.

[@JaykeTurner]

Don't depend your market assessments and decisions on hearsay and rumors; I did it in 2020 and ended up with worthless market holdings. Before I started noticing any notable improvements in my portfolio, Heather and I had to completely rebuild it. I've been using the same advisor ever then, and in just two years I've scaled up to $876k. Depending on where you look, a bullish or down market might both produce good profits.

[@AngelsEyes-ny1pc]

@@JaykeTurner Thats a good one. I know a lot of folks that made fortunes from the Dotcom crash as well as the 08’ crash and I’ve been looking into similar opportunities in this present market. Could this coach that guides you help?

[@JaykeTurner]

@@AngelsEyes-ny1pc She should. Having a counselor is quite imperative for portfolio diversification. My advisor is ''HEATHER ANN CHRISTENSEN''. She is easily looked up and has extensive knowledge of the financial markets.

[@AngelsEyes-ny1pc]

@@JaykeTurner Found her webpage, I wrote her an email and scheduled a call. Hopefully she responds. Thank you.

[@madmachanicest9955]

I just like to point out that Florida has had 3 once in a hundred year hurricanes in my lifetime and I'm only 30. That means on a local scale we're dealing with once A hundred Year situations every decade. So they really should call it once every 10 years not once every 100.

[@c567591]

Are the 1 in 100 year storms poorly named? (yes) Are the actual historical trends going back centuries known? (almost never) We are using insufficient data and making poor extrapolations from it. Depending where you start the graph, they can show increasing and decreasing trends with the same data, just different starting points. The truth is far more complex than it is made out to be.

[@madmachanicest9955]

@@c567591 yes you're right they're poorly named. However we've seen an almost continuous increase in the severity of storms and the number of storms being produced every single year for at least the last three soon to be for decades. That means that our records we have now from recent data points so that the scale is dramatically off on our estimates are wrong. We need to use and adjust the scale based on modern data. they haven't done that yet.

[@diane774]

It sounds better on the news to say once every 100 years

[@mikelewis1166]

Once in a hundred sounds scary tho. $

[@peterslegers6121]

The scales are off, because of global warming. The earth is getting hotter kzbin.info/www/bejne/nXvXgHaJnsaknrM and that causes more extreme weather patterns. Only fossile fuel industry propaganda says it's something else, but they're false. The once in x amount of time events are used by policy makers to prepare for disaster. Governments are simply not prepared for those larger disasters to happen as often as they're going to be. Is that scary? Yes. But it's more scary to deny it and make things worse.

[@tholam4791]

RED FLAG: when you CEO relies in name dropping Tesla, who manufactures cars, to validate their company.

[@madmachanicest9955]

Finally 8 minutes in I get to something that doesn't fill me with foaming rage. The floating foundation concept for housing in Louisiana is actually brilliant and a version of it should be implemented just about everywhere. Modifying existing infrastructures also always an easier sell.

[@c567591]

It is a interesting concept. We need a full scale test to see how it performs and what drawbacks it will have. Then it can be properly evaluated.

[@CrunchyBaguette]

It’s interesting but like what we saw in NJ/NY the question is whether it makes sense to add these retrofits/lifts vs rebuilding a poor quality house. Anyone who has renovated a poorly built house and noticed the issues with code compliance will know that touching those is a can of worms that may be more expensive than a fresh builder grade house.

[@madmachanicest9955]

@@CrunchyBaguette you're right but that's still no reason to do tests and a few renovations full scale to see how this project works. And based on what I'm seeing it should be come part of the standard building code in areas that can flood especially Louisiana.

[@seeranos]

I’m with you, this focus on building new cities and abandoning current ones is infuriating in how boneheaded, wasteful, and heartless it is.

[@GetMyNoteLowered]

🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮

[@didalouchui2154]

We already have floating cities, they are called cruise ships. Instead of dismantling those giant ones, just tie three of them together, and retrofit them: one for lodging, one for living, and one for research, and you got a floating city. This design is modular just like the one discussed in 2:17. I just hope they are really tighten down, and don't crash in land during one of those 1000 years events.

[@saynotop2w]

Cruise ships stay operational because people pay millions per trip. They are incredibly expensive to operate in general.

[@seanwalters1977]

@@saynotop2w And you think these floating houses are going to be affordable to the common person?

[@Ahmad-ww4ue]

@@saynotop2w Not only to operate but to build in the first place. Last time I checked, the cheapest was several hundreds million dollars and many cost $1 billion to build. Still, I like the cruise ship idea and it would be great if their cost could somehow be brought down.

[@emirgonul9027]

who knew Kevin Constner's Waterworld was ahead of it's time😀

[@pongop]

Very true! Also Armageddon with the DART mission lol

[@StephenSmith304]

If they make modular islands, imo they should be more like super blocks with mixed use development to reduce the need to commute between them instead of doing single purpose zoning.

[@hikosaemon]

Looking at 0:22 I now fear this project will fail because project team members failed to locate Busan properly on a map…

[@pastorcoreyadams]

Interesting video. I am wondering about tsunamis. Will the floating cities float above the waves? I am thinking of the December 26, 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami and March 11, 2011 Japan tsunami. If they were further out to sea they would mitigate some of those issues. The closer to the shore the more risk for tsunamis. It would be interesting to see both a compute model and a physical tank model of a “floating city” next to a shore and how they would handle a large wave. Interesting new industry to watch as well as the retrofitting of houses to float in place.

[@Stylez-13]

You ever heard of Atlantis?

[@marcozolo3536]

Yes they can be tsunami proof, although the architectural requirements would be much more intensive

[@jeretso]

No you cant surf a tsunami. Tsunami would destroy this city but its better than nothing. When the water retracts or the tsunami warning blows better move to high ground like our ancestors did.

[@HTV-2_Hypersonic_Glide_Vehicle]

Busan has sea walls located to where they would reduce the tsunami waves power in the bay area where these modular islands will be built

[@aarontaylor1040]

Only if they are positioned in a way that the building follow the receding tide out to see before the Tsunami gathers momentum. The structures won't be very comfortable to live on if they are far out at sea, as it will be no different than a cruise ship I imagine.

[@Pau_Pau9]

*Water World,* *Here we come!*

[@kineticstar]

I'm not buying any of this. This is not affordable for all economic levels. What economic advantage or businesses that could be sustained on these platforms? How do you transport the working class into the city with all kind of weather events? This is a 1% utopia that provides no benefits to the general public.

[@moneyobsessed]

the first phones were for the rich only, then by scaling up it became affordable to a lot of people

[@madmachanicest9955]

Yeah the floating city concept feels new with murderous rage. But the amphibious foundation are floating foundation project from later in the video that's something I can get behind that has some legitimate good simple engineering behind it. And it's theoretically cheap enough of a retrofit to become standardized code for a new construction and a required code retrofit for old construction or it can be applied. Namely places like Louisiana and Florida that are guaranteed to flood in warm weather.

[@adamlreid]

@@moneyobsessed are we just supposed to rebuild all our coastal cities from scratch? talk about pollution

[@karld1791]

Yeah it’s probably really expensive. There are diagrams of ocean farms growing shellfish and seaweed below and tidal electric generators. People could work in those industries to help pay for the place. It’s hard to see those covering the expense though.

[@sergiodelatorre7356]

I like the idea but what I think the biggest issue is that is not addressed is utilities. How are the gas and water lines going to move up and down? That's a big thing that's not addressed in this video.

[@tuanx]

Why would they have gas lines?

[@sn5301679]

Drinking water and gas is plausible with flexible pipe. The bigger issue is the toilet waste.

[@LewisJGreyson]

Water distillation stations that are likely part of the islands design.

[@peterslegers6121]

@@sn5301679 Sewerage is again done with flexible pipes. On board all waste water is passed through a grinder that breaks down all waste into small pieces that won't block the conduits down the line. Then there's a waste water tank and a pump with a backflow stop that pushes the waste water ashore (persleiding = pressure conduit).

[@captainhickey2608]

Aztecs did it, chinampas. Worth looking at the example for food growing.

[@saynotop2w]

Floating infrastructure is by far the coolest, but that also means the most expensive maintenance. I think we should go with earthships.

[@madmachanicest9955]

You know as a Floridian I could think of only one theoretical upside to a floating city. And that is if the platform can be towed it can be moved out of the way of major storms. Granted if given the option I just head up River in a houseboat but I'm a sensible person not trying to build a 100 trillion dollar problem to fix a billion dollar one.

[@ph11p3540]

Do you have a clue how hard it is to move a half million ton floating structure. It's doable but it takes weeks just to safely maneuver a few hundred miles. It's physically impossible for a half dozen of the worlds most powerful tugs to move such massive structures inside of a few days.

[@madmachanicest9955]

@@ph11p3540 yes I do understand how impossibly hard moving in entire floating city would be. I think the entire floating city concept is an incredibly stupid egotistical elitist waste of money. if you make it too big to move it all you're doing is creating debris that can be thrown around by a storm surge except this time it the size of a city block. Practically speaking you would need a nuclear powered engine and some kind of variable thrust guided system in an advanced computer system just to be able to control it and the number of places you would be able to park the floating structure itself is extremely limited. But if they can't move these individual building structures they're talking about all they're doing is creating a minimum several hundred ton floating battery ram to crush entire city blocks during a storm surge.

[@jaydibernardo4320]

Me:Great idea! Typhoon: Let's chat,

[@karld1791]

There are examples of amphibious buildings. Riverboat casinos in the Mississippi River around Vicksburg sit in the river on the bottom in low water and they float held in place by chains in high water.

[@spooky.-]

This might be plausible for places like the Netherlands and Singapore who are highly dense and rising sea levels are affecting them but at that point land reclamation is just a much better choice.

[@gamh03]

Yes until its not economic viable. we are getting closer to where sand is much more valuable resources than to make land in the sea.

[@HTV-2_Hypersonic_Glide_Vehicle]

@@gamh03 isn't makin land in the sea what sand will be used for?

[@MrHav1k]

I love it!!! Innovation at it's purest.

[@thewiseperson8748]

House boats have been known for years. What's new in this innovation ? Does this mean that sewage is directly injected into the water; it will become an open sewer around the settlement.

[@madmachanicest9955]

I actually kind of find this very ironic you see traditionally before air conditioning houses in FLorida were built on high ground and where they couldn't be built on a high ground they were built on stilt foundations so that even if the entire area flooded it would have to get to 220 ft of water to get into your house. So the principal the floating foundation house actually makes a lot of sense and is good engineering it's just hilarious because we already had a solution to the problem and up until like the 1940s.

[@KRYMauL]

Post WWII housing was a horrible idea, and we never should’ve done it. They literally went away from 10,000 years of trial and error and are blaming Millennials for wanting to do a bunch of ctrl + Z.

[@TheGruntski]

In the Florida keys I saw a lot of houses that consisted of a concrete pad with steel posts that supported a house. The house is accessed by a steel spiral staircase, the car is parked underneath on the concrete pad. The steel posts are long enough to be higher than hurricane swell is ever likely to be. It's not complicated and appears to work well.

[@michaelchristensen2621]

BROAD Group manufactures something they call a B-Core slab. It's a steel panel with very thin steel cylinders inside it. It is used in skycrapers etc. due to its strength whilst using a lot less steel. Each B-core slab contains a lot of air so it can float. Their product brochure shows floating cities. Worth checking out.

[@tkidd250]

The interesting part will be the utilities and the foundation with how it deals with erosion

[@esportsnewstv9554]

We'll, It is a useful, realistic solution and innovation for areas suffering the damage of climate change. As far as I know, this model helps houses stay away from the flood, houses will be higher as the sea level rises, thus protecting people's possessions

[@ericpham7773]

This help reduce transportation affect on agriculture so no hunger or drought or out of season rhythm of season..because the train and truck hurt agriculture too much could threaten from the potential of disruption

[@louislesch3878]

Um, what about sewer, water supply, and most other utilities buried underground that tie into the house? You didn’t mention any of that stuff?

[@karld1791]

Probably have to use tidal electric power generation, composting toilet systems and water desalination. These all exist though are rare so many issues would have to be worked out at expense. Though I think this projects purpose is to work out all the issues to build floating cities.

[@louislesch3878]

@@karld1791 you are right but I was referring to the idea of retrofitting existing houses to make them able to float.

[@TomNook.]

Yes. Not by choice though 😅

[@TheOak12345]

How do you deal with waves? I have a possible Category 4 heading towards me on the Florida West Coast - would something like this survive?

[@4040-w1u]

if you want natural ones then mangroves, and if its not possible you can build a post or tetrapods that somewhat make the waves weak

[@futeramonfuturamet4830]

I could see at least a few of those towns in international waters where people can experiment with different governance systems that are not based on coercion.

[@tuanx]

Except no, international waters are often extremely deep & the costs would be astronomical that it would only realistically become havens for the rich to do & get away with things they'd likely be unable to within a governed nation.

[@warrentoles3127]

@@tuanx that part of the architecture was a joke lol

[@jasonkoroma4323]

@@tuanx They've already gotten away with a lot shady stuff already. Being in International waters won't male a difference except for more competitive governance by honest market participants.

[@amazon4716]

There goes the sunlight for all the plants and creatures underneath those floating structures.

[@Its-Just-Gizmo]

It's like the prequel to Water World

[@drmodestoesq]

How come as sea levels rose...the inhabitants of Earth didn't all go to the Himalayas? Did they forget where the Himalayas were? In the future they don't have access to Google maps? They have to rely on a girl's tattooed back?

[@FedJimSmith]

@@drmodestoesq maybe some escaped to the outer space , ie Mars for all we know, and those the couples that's on top of the Everest didn't get the memo

[@cfltheman]

If a billionaire invests in something like this, it will be as a tax dodge.

[@futeramonfuturamet4830]

Taxation is extortion!

[@ronkirk5099]

Much more cost effective to just move to high ground. We don't need the 'Waterworld' option.

[@Student0Toucher]

Wouldn’t a strong hurricane completely destroy a floating house lol or sweep it away into the ocean or something

[@teddymoon3744]

great idea and COMMON sense.

[@navajyotichetia8968]

Angrier and angrier and angrier as the flooding lifted me higher and higher and higher

[@madmachanicest9955]

So basically the first 10 seconds of this video are they all companies going FYGM is a tune of 84 billion dollars in flood damage a year.

[@ph11p3540]

You can make concrete structures float. We have successfully built concrete boats, and floating oil platforms from concrete. This big issue is marine concrete construction is very expensive, high maintenance and short lived compared to their land based structures. Such structures only make sense for residential construction when land prices are hyper expensive and everyone is working in high paying high end jobs. These are pipe dream projects much like Palm and World Islands in Dubai.

[@madmachanicest9955]

Hey guess what's technically wetlands, the district of Columbia AKA DC the Capitol building of the United States. Miami Florida is a man-made Sandbar built into wetlands. Disney World in Orlando Florida are built on wetlands. The entire freaking state of Louisiana. Most of New Jersey and Long Island were originally wetlands. And several parts of what is now in New York City. Oh also St Petersburg Russia and Moscow are all built on wetlands and technically part of London is also wetlands.

[@podsmpsg1]

Back to the Future Part II said we'd have hoverboards by 2015. It's 2022, we still don't.

[@e.h.4933]

But they did invent a Star Wars style speeder.

[@seanwalters1977]

Hell, we barely even have consistent electricity anymore

[@boomboominroom]

Those city islands sound good in nature but it will be little cities for the rich.

[@IdOfFanin]

It's gotta withstand rising sea level, flood, hurricanes, and zombie apocalypse since it's near Busan.

[@TM-tw1py]

I'll stick with boats or houseboats - problem solved.

[@anonguerdoojennifer91]

Most intelligent words I’ve heard

[@omnizen]

I like the idea of "floating homes" along existing coastal areas, but something tells me there could be problems with extending coastal cities into waveless areas such as bays, harbors, deltas, wetlands, marshes, and rivers. To disrupt existing waterways by filling them up with more human habitations does not seem to me a likely beneficial endeavor. Our waterways are already experiencing irreversible destruction. What has happened to the UN recognition of population proliferation as an unhealthy imbalance to earth's resources, organisms, and plant life? I am suspect that there is no mention of sewage treatment or management in this video. Adding nitrogen to the oceans and especially to largely stagnant water collections has deleterious effects, such as blue algae. Nevertheless, I share the excitement about scientifically exploring all these possibilities.

[@chriskim7123]

I'm Korean and didn't know this grand planning was going in action rn 😳

[@edwardtobiasen3386]

What is to protect these islands from storm surge, strong winds, heavy downpours, and simply big waves

[@omnigeddon]

The wizard of Oz much? Be in California and get hit with a storm and wake up in Australia lmaoooo

[@tyisamess]

I think it’s okay to let Florida sink. Sometimes nature knows best.

[@aziris7257]

If Florida Man is any indication, maybe you're right.

[@TristanSamuel]

Theme parks: Are we jokes to you

[@dQ-sl6uy]

Love it so much there is a lot of material roof membrain tpo can be welded or make new bags that can be inflate under any house traila any city can be flowting high as a big wave allways playin with calm water

[@aarononeal9830]

Cnbc needs to talk about Ecosia they are a search engine that plants trees

[@adamlreid]

Floating cities are kinda a scam (on a large scale anyway). What impact will this have on the coastal ecosystem? Nevermind the logistics of city services. We should just consider moving away from the coast. And also be trying to reverse climate change.

[@MRTOWELRACK]

I know right. I can appreciate the desire to accommodate existing infrastructure (Coastal Netherlands, Miami, New Orleans), but we should avoid building out in flood plains.

[@meejinhuang]

This won't deal with storm surges. Storm gates need to be built for all coastal port cities.

[@Dwaynekdclarke876]

Why is the audio on most CNBC video so low

[@JobPWN]

"You can't stop the rising sea" as someone from the Netherlands I would disagree with this statement, for now, but it was only after the trauma of the 'Watersnoodramp' of 1953 we understood the need to invest in coastal protection. You would think the US would have responded the same way after Katrina, but your stagnant politics seem to have doomed you to fail

[@intheuniversekey]

What we should do instead is make floating gardens like the mayans did non water waste Farming. And have fishes in there. chinampa, also called floating garden, small, stationary, artificial island built on a freshwater lake for agricultural purposes. Chinampan was the ancient name for the southwestern region of the Valley of Mexico, the region of Xochimilco, and it was there that the technique was-and is still-most widely used.

[@pongop]

Chinampas are amazing!

[@lordjael]

Incredible how floating cities are the topic of conversation when governments can’t even manage money properly for their citizens. 💀 One step at a time, guys. 😂

[@warrentoles3127]

Have you ever heard the phrase "Platforms are stronger than governments "??? It's literally built on a platform 😭😭😭😭😭

[@seanwalters1977]

Yeah I'm more concerned about our failed and failing infrastructure and electric grid than I am building a play pen for wealthy people that want to have a floating house.

[@w2385-i2s]

They never watch waterworld? It failed.

[@davidkuitunen5286]

Buy a million dollar condo that depreciates like a boat. Great idea.

[@lowify1]

This floating city concept reminds me of Volume 3 episode 1 of Love, Death and Robots. Human still end up killing themselves in floating cities.

[@Regularcael]

I laughed so hard when she said they jack the house up a little and the house floats away

[@lanceluna9781]

So we can more directly pollute the ocean right?

[@madmachanicest9955]

3,000 people on four acres of space hell no. I've been much rather be crushed by a tidal wave. Are drowned by the rising sea levels that have to live with that many freaking people crammed into a 4 acre sardine can. I grew up in a 4 acre private lot in a small town in Baldwin it's not that big.

[@TransportSimulatorNationTSN]

This looks better than that "The Line" city 😆

[@user-uc9fx4ru7p]

Sad that the human race is failing to solve climate change. And that ideas and plan like this are needed

[@YM-ix8uw]

Dumb concept, if you cared so much about your valuables. Just build another floor. From 1 floor to 2-floor single family house unit. Property value will increase. Whether the dumb idea of "floating" island or retrofitting houses. The end result is the same as you were to be building another floor to your single family house. Some guy in the beginning of the video telling us that he's the next elon musk... Rather than spending money on renewable energy and others to combat climate change. We will rely on some rich guy's land. that island is next to the home country (United States, South Korea, Taiwan, etc...) because no way they are going to build it with no protection from government. Literally 1984. With all of that aside, highly doubt it would survive an actual disaster. Maybe some light stuff like small flood that is 2 inch high or earthquake magnitude of 1.0 - 3.0 max. Note: To the people living in the "floating" island in the future, what jobs are they going to work? The only thing I could think of is Software developer and other high paying remote working jobs. So it's going to be expensive, Why? Upcharge for “amazing” view.

[@blackbelt2000]

So when the floating house retrofits start to float in a flooding situation, are the plumbing, electrical, gas designed to break off? Still better than losing your entire house, I guess.

[@edwincoval]

As an architect in nyc..great concept but it has limitations and may not be all that economically feasible.

[@birdstwin1186]

Too many goals trying to be achieved with this project. Ways too many people with their fingers in the pie, just let the chef cook the pie and everyone else get their fingers OUT! Unfortunately, the project will fail because of that. I like this idea because I like engineering, construction and architecture especially. Hopefully someone in the future will take this idea and understand the concept of Minimal Product Viability and stop trying to be all things for all people.

[@madmachanicest9955]

I think their project is going to fail because it's built on the same greed that required floating architecture to be built in the first place. It will collapse like an expensive house of cards or the people who built it and live on it will face the consequences of screwing everyone else over.

[@madmachanicest9955]

Also the myth of the genius inventor or the lead designer of a project being with omnipotent God who can see every single solitary aspect of how it's supposed to be designed and directed. It has probably resulted in more failed projects and then just about anything else.

[@willcookmakeup]

3 acres for 3,000 people? That seems kind of small

[@woltews]

no one is talking about water and sewer - those pipes do not move well at all and the angel the pipes are at is extremely critical

[@Ebotoman79]

Waterworld in the house! 😂👏🏾👍🏾

[@madmachanicest9955]

We basically known that building on wetlands has been a stupid idea since we were still making buildings out of stone. We've known what the actual scale ramifications of destroying wetlands for housing was at least since the 1960s. They're going to develop it anyway no matter what we do. Short of making this area Federal property under the national Park service large areas of wetlands will be bulldozed and developed and result in flooding and what used to not be wetlands. Saying there's an incentive to prevent areas from retrofitting buildings to float in an emergency because it will lead the development of pre-existing wetlands is probably one of the stupidest excuses I've ever heard in my life. They're just going to do it anyway. Tell everyone new bulldozing the freaking barrier Islands to convert them into Fancy pants expensive condos was a stupid idea decades before hurricane Katrina destroyed the entire city of New Orleans.

[@robertagren9360]

Wetlands absorb carbon and prevent dehydration of the land. Reducing dust and pollution.

[@madmachanicest9955]

@@robertagren9360 yes they also wetlands contribute to the local water cycle having a dramatic effect on microclimates. They're actually far better at storing and filtering water then most of our pre-existing systems and they're critically important for blocking storms from hurricanes. All of this is true and all of it has been true basically forever and it essentially known about it since the 1960s. The problem is all the people making the decisions care about is number go up. The rich and land developers will continue to destroy wetlands as rapidly as possible to replace them with whatever will make them the most money. No matter what we do. So to me using that as an excuse to not develop the amphibious slash floating foundation project is asinine. AKA painfully stupid.

[@robertagren9360]

@@madmachanicest9955 These previous wetlands becomes wastelands and people just move their operation elsewhere because the government work by panicking solving tasks and give smaller tasks to states. As an example is the interest rate who should had already been increased in 2020 when the unemployment rised. They knew, they had people who know how things work but they don't do it. Because it's easier to give money to states than solving them on your own. Money solve everything is our generation of corruption where everything is solved with Maslow's hammer which is the concept of the Sovjet and the symbol.

[@unknown9227]

HOW CAN I MESSAGE YOU?? I HAVE SOMETHING TO ASK ABOUT AN APPLICATION, PLEASE REPLY

[@melisboregard]

Is it not easier to move inlands instead? How is plumbing supposed to work in a house that rises and sinks with the ocean? Will all movable parts not be clogged by mussels. I'm not an engineer so maybe these ar all easy to fix...

[@karld1791]

It’d probably have use composting toilets and ocean farms of mussels , clams and oysters below to filter water effluent. I’ve seen some diagrams with ocean farms and tidal electric generators below and solar desalination above so it isn’t tightly connected to the shore.

[@TalynWuff]

Wow, i'm amazed at how out of options we are for mitigating climate change. Lets just go "waterworld", here we go.

[@leathomsen3884]

Seems this woman is good at work. How do I get in contact with her

[@thesilentone4024]

Just tell us already go watch water world and thats basically what where doing living on boats like not difficult to say. Also thirsty concrete and cement are a thing it lets water run through it not over it so it lets groundwater recharge not just deplete and dry up to nothing.

[@mendesleiteyuri]

"Busan, South Korea", proceeds to show a spot close to Hong Kong instead.

[@1985toyotacamry]

I can see this happening

[@auro1986]

will cities that float survive oceanic storms with those big waves?

[@robertagren9360]

No, it won't and the weather in the future will be unpredictable. The only way this work is that you build the city in a lake. When the lake expand the city will float on the lake instead of being sunk into the ground. The idea of putting a city at the atlantic ocean is stupid but you can do it at an inland ocean. The idea of putting the city near the sea shore is stupid while we need logistics we should try to improve railroads by building it on a bridge. Rome managed to transport water but we can't figure out how to build a rail on a bridge. As the city expand people will start to settle at the land and the center of the city is a lifeboat. If a disaster would occur only half of the citizens will die.

[@thevoyagerguide7183]

How will these houses manage if there is tsunami?

[@faraivalentine5440]

You are welcome to come to Africa. We have plenty of land for everyone.

[@Ckoudous]

No way that these cities won't be a have and have not scenario. There absolutely will be rich ones and poor ones.

[@pareshpaul001]

Please balance weight onto expensive platforms...

[@dQ-sl6uy]

Yall can do high floating concrete high wys to floating citys high

[@kaleem9185]

0:23 That's definitely not South Korea.

[@gladcs]

Yes it is

[@kaleem9185]

@@gladcs they have updated their video now. Earlier it was showing near Hong Kong.

[@LoveHandle4890]

We already have garbage island’s out there tho.

[@drmodestoesq]

This concept would be better applied to open ocean fish farms.....which it is. This has no economically viable reason for existing. Have you ever driven through Utah? Or Saskatchewan? Hundreds of kilometers of empty highway as far as the eye can see. What's the point of spending these billions on floating cities that are going to be wiped out by the first category 5 hurricane? And what about fresh water delivery and sewage disposal? Is the garbage boat going to come every other Thursday?

[@sarak4418]

Oh wow

[@sindisophood4319]

Wat a good idea for us to dirty the ocean that we’ve already polluted

[@dQ-sl6uy]

Amazing green lands green roof green wals for the middle hose all the houses sealed couted

[@ericphantri96734]

It need wave breaker fence that break large wave and generate electricity

[@jackforshaw4439]

If this is a UN project and costs over $100B how much of that is out of the UK budget?

[@iSucrose]

Isn’t that part of world always dealing with tsunamis?

[@edwincoval]

All building problems are solvable...if you have enough money!

[@killlamas57]

Just like flying cars, im confused. Isn’t a floating house a boat? Just like a flying car is a plane?

[@Vip__honey]

Claim your : Here within an hour : ticket here 🙌😀

[@jermainec2462]

Lol they may not have a choice but to float 😂

[@4040-w1u]

then we pollute the water that we also use to drink? 🤔