How lucky is too lucky?: The Minecraft Speedrunning Dream Controversy Explained

[@standupmaths]

I’m not commenting on how many takes that took. But feel free to guess! (And if you must know: the complete footage of every attempt will be uploaded to Patreon. patreon.com/standupmaths )

[@hammer313]

I would of had a green screen as a background and rendered a background with a dartboard in post. ;)

[@dogruinsmoor]

I’m impressed that you didn’t screw it up by smiling when it eventually happened... very cool head!

[@somerandomweeb4836]

I've send you an attempted proof of the collatz conjecture mind checking it out? I need your help with part of the proof.

[@TBH_Inc]

It was just one take right? You just got lucky!

[@jovaraszigmantas]

i assume it is close to 0010(in binary) multiplied by cubic root of parkers square. Right?

[@WalkingTaako42]

The missing bracket just means that the rest of the paper, and indeed the rest of all existence after you started reading the formula, is now part of the formula.

[@EebstertheGreat]

)

[@nevs0917]

@@EebstertheGreat THANK YOU

[@pvic6959]

@@nevs0917 _FINALLY_ i can die in peace

[@WalkingTaako42]

@@EebstertheGreat (

[@QPUNeptune]

@@WalkingTaako42 ) no

[@toycat]

I love when you see a Minecraft event so big it hits the wider KZbin world, including educational content

[@khoonmane]

not expecting to see you here man

[@tuple5982]

It's cool isn't it?

[@Guillaume_Paczek]

I love to see my fav maths ytbers getting into Minecraft theory 😁

[@dixoncider8372]

Yeah but... this ain’t good for the game at all

[@tylerdurden629]

@@dixoncider8372 negative publicity is good publicity

[@yonko_Z]

This reminds me of a quote I saw online from a journalism class. “If one source says it’s sunny outside and another says it’s pouring. Your job is not to cite both sources, it’s to look out the f*cking window and find out which is right.”

[@penguins4284]

This is a pretty good quote

[@iDeLaYeD_o]

@@penguins4284 It's an old joke. Not a bad joke as it will always be useful to get a point across but still a joke not a quote (unless someone can put a name to who said it)

[@iDeLaYeD_o]

From the weather I had driving home my answer would be, Yes.

[@Alistair]

@@iDeLaYeD_o technically it's a quote from whoever created the joke

[@lambchop3014]

and now a new favourite quote! :D

[@hoi-polloi1863]

My probability class did an exercise... they had one student flip a coin 100 times, and another student was told to just write down H&T randomly, without any props. Professor claimed that he could tell which was the true random series from the coin, because the student doing it by hand would be too shy to put in appropriate-length strings of heads (or tails) in a row. It was a neat game!

[@lanachiu793]

ZzZzz

[@baritonesax245]

thats really interesting!

[@hoi-polloi1863]

@@baritonesax245 It's been a while, but as I remember, you expect a string of log base 2(# flips) of heads or tails in a row somewhere in the sequence. The fake random sequences never had more than 2 or 3 HHH or TTT, even for 100 flips.

[@helderboymh]

Numberphile did a video on this called randomness is random. Where the host does 20 flips in his head and writes the down and the other person tries to predict what he picked.

[@Posiman]

Yeah, human brains suck at randomness. Our brains are amazing at finding patters in everything, so true randomness never seem random enough...

[@PracticalEngineeringChannel]

Obviously, the talking head scenes were shot in reverse and dubbed.

[@standupmaths]

No comment.

[@reddragon3132]

Dubbed? Pretty sure Matt just learnt to speak backwards

[@awpmerst]

@@standupmaths commenting 'no comment' :O

[@Tom_Tom_Klondike]

No reply

[@WhoWatchesVideos]

I guess this is why you're Practical Engineering, not Practical Performance Art

[@RealEngineering]

Okay, I played minecraft in like 2009-2010 and I did not understand how someone could possibly speed run that game.......turns out it has changed a lot in 10 years

[@d3vitron779]

You are now a boomer

[@evmc1857]

Believe it or not, a lot of circuits in Minecraft like or and and gates are very similar to circuits in real life.

[@samsunguser3148]

wow

[@God-ec8ni]

everything can be speed runned some even speed run life

[@bluecrab2]

Woah that's awesome @Real Engineering, not many people played that far back. Actually, many versions from those years are missing! There's an entire community seeking lost versions of Minecraft mostly from 2009-2010 so if you could find one in you folders that'd be incredible!

[@whatdamath]

If only this video came out about 8 years ago when I was trying to present my thesis on "Teaching Math with Minecraft"

[@thefacethatstares]

hi anton :)

[@kebeiwjwgseywgw5590]

hello wonderful person

[@Sipwipbip]

Hiii

[@hahaplease97]

Lol Anton, you're here too. I actually like watching your astronomy videos alot.

[@livintolearn7053]

Woah didn't expect to see you here, Mr. Universe Guide

[@Sparts17]

"So you're saying there's a chance!" is basically Dream's entire defense, btw. Which is hilarious.

[@eldritchbeluga9277]

he's got a better chance at winning the lottery everyday than being innocent

[@thenoobypro790]

Well… there’s always a chance. Theres a chance that a 1 in 10^1000000000009 will happen to me right now. But it’s not likly to happen

[@vwlz8637]

there's a achance that every particle in my body will quantum tunnel to jupiter but hey

[@Sparts17]

@@vwlz8637 BUT IT COULD HAPPEN

[@rickysmyth]

Dream is not a Minecraft developer so cant manipulate RNG. He could not change the RNG even if he wanted to. You just don't know the story and how Minecraft works.

[@_WhiteMage]

'I'm not saying he's cheating. I'm just saying if the _entire population of Earth played an entire game of minecraft every second for a hundred years,_ he's still many orders of magnitude luckier than any of them would probably have gotten.'

[@XCC23]

actually, you're *still kind of understating it* . If the entire population of Earth played *33* games of minecraft every second for a hundred years...

[@squibble311]

@@XCC23 why 33?

[@XCC23]

@@squibble311 dream had 33 runs in which he started killing blazes.

[@XCC23]

@Aquaintence Buddy Yeah. That's mostly just a rounding up to make a better upper limit + making the math nicer, but the speedrun vs series of six streams is an actual difference.

[@ghifari77]

"Well, dream is a god then" - Dream stans

[@Adderkleet]

I can't tell if the book-toss was: 1) Good enough to count, no more takes, just move on. 2) Better than intended, since it didn't slot into the others but it's upright and fully visible. 3) Exactly as intended.

[@tbpotn]

I was wondering the same, im gonna go with 2 haha!

[@tttITA10]

1. Definitely. It almost sloted perfectly: should that not be the objective, it should have had become the objective.

[@spusho]

Its always 3

[@thomdendk4478]

@@spusho Exactly

[@LadyPelikan]

17:16 if you missed it (like I did...)

[@faithnfire4769]

And this friends is why you trust mathematicians who will put their name on their papers, rather than random, unnamed, and unknown astrophysicists. Cause only one of them will willingly admit/defend when they bodge a paper.

[@mellamojeff458]

this was a reason i gave to his rabid fans when i told them how research and finding reliable sources to work with is the best chance of dream being right however it turned out dream literally just hired someone to do incredibly bad math and came from a wix website made a couple weeks prior to this event that still had its watermark of wix on it

[@MrEdrftgyuji]

Wrong. Never trust authority. Trust the rules of mathematics and read what they write, not who they are. Putting blind trust in people just because some university said they can put letters after their name is just stupid. And a cause of a lot of the issues we see in the world. In the dream case , the mathematics is simple. You can work it out yourself with a calculator.

[@diekritischestimme]

It's not enough for the scientist to put his name, considering all the potential conflict of interests in the real world, when it is not about Minecraft, but medical statistic justifying lockdowns or the lethality of a virus. In fact, I would say that only independend scientists are real scientists, everyone else is a scientific prostitute creating the numbers which are wanted by his clients. (the people who order the study to prove their ideology correctly)

[@Lo33y_]

Funnily enough, the scientist did redact the initial paper saying that there were alot of mistakes, mainly due to not understanding the game. Which makes sense. And btw he didn't want to put his name on the paper cause he didn't want to get public backlash from it, and lets face even if dream was innocent and the paper just proved it, he still would get alot of backlash. And in a time where having a job is so important and finding work is incredibly difficult think it's fair to want to stay anonymous to stop people calling for you to get fired, which does happen.

[@MrEdrftgyuji]

@@diekritischestimme That is certainly the case with "computer modelling", especially when modelling large-scale problems (like how a virus spreads worldwide). The problem is so complex, that you need to make lots of assumptions in order to make the problem calculable. And the trouble with assumptions is, people have a tendency to pick numbers that give the answers they want to see. Which is why computer modelling of these types of problems are infamous for being inaccurate, or just plain wrong. However, that doesn't stop the doom-mongers from telling everyone they are going to die of covid or the planet is going to explode in five years.

[@AlKohaiMusic]

Fun fact; one of the guys who noticed this statical unlikeliness and called dream out got caught cheating by also futsing with the games probability. I guess cheaters recognize cheaters

[@m0llux]

It's all about experience, huh.

[@bettercalldelta]

Since he's a cheater he has in-depth knowledge of the probability stuff so he knows when others do the same

[@Spacegirl-l9q]

Birds of a feather flock together

[@pastashack3517]

"He just like me fr"

[@jimmyjamespwnysux]

Takes a cheater to know a cheater

[@somedudeok1451]

The fact that he definitely played on an altered version and then paid a mathematician to create a biased paper, is such a disgusting move.

[@deadlock852]

Probably not a mathematician just a person who understands a lot of math

[@jarvis6253]

This man?

[@wonderpunch4984]

Dream really doesnt deserve all those subs he has

[@sam5992]

That astrophysicist/astrostatistician is probably responsible for a rocket or two blowing up.

[@Sampopankki]

I just find it very human xD I find it more disgusting that people need this video to even get close to making sense of the truth while it IS very clear. As we see the math show. I would LOVE for this video to be completely unnecessary proof-wise (nothing against Matt of course), but unfortunately it is not. Cheers.

[@duckface1038]

The fact that this man actually went to the lengths to understand minecraft is just wonderful

[@sakikogookheng]

I dont think he went out and "understood" minecraft in the sense you're suggesting. It's a childs game with a simple premise, not too difficult of a concept to grasp. Not only that he seemed to have only examined the loot tables thoroughly, as that was what was in question. Understanding minecraft, as you seem to mean, isn't as easy as knowing it involves gathering resources and killing a dragon

[@acezaro7927]

I think it's ironic because the dude understands so much about math XD

[@cylvanus8765]

@@sakikogookheng I getcha... but Minecraft wasn't intended to be a kids game. It's a game for everyone. Not even Notch expected so many kids to be constantly playing the game.

[@VisionThing]

Eh... I don’t play it but “get pearls, kill dragon” isn’t exactly the hardest thing to grasp. A quick look at the loot tables and you are set. Come on.

[@saintpoli6800]

@@sakikogookheng You clearly have never gotten into redstone, automatic farms, nor sorting machines. Minecraft, on the surface, is simple... Factorio, is simple on its’ surface- you crash landed on a foreign planet, build factories, build a rocket, then you win. But when you actually get into, it’s incredibly complex and requires math.

[@doggobind]

To put that kind of "luck" in perspective, flip a penny 13 times, and if it lands on heads on all 13 times, go buy 3 lottery tickets with 1/1000000 chances of winning, if you win all 3 lottery tickets, that's the kind of luck dream would have had to have to pull that off legitimately.

[@ccf3294]

This comment needs more love. Jesus Christ the maths there.

[@acxesta2]

@@binomial3837 No. 1 in 7.5 trillion was actually the upper bound on the chance that ANYONE would ever get Dream's luck on any set of runs. For just a random session of 6 livestreams, to get Dream's luck, it's closer to 1 in 10^22.

[@kingofgrim4761]

@@acxesta2 yeah they made it much “better” luck wise for dream and it was still no where near probable LMAO glad he finally admitted

[@leadmaxwellarco2574]

In a row i assume?

[@kingofgrim4761]

@@leadmaxwellarco2574 yes that’s what it was saying.

[@priestofsyrinx4931]

Fun fact: 1 in 2.0x10^22 is like 1 millimetre in 2000 light-years.

[@reddd-77]

@@threemetreydog cringe

[@DragoX25]

Thanks for the enlightenment

[@yourfavoritezoomer9104]

DAMN. That really put that in perspective. For reference, the diameter of our solar system from one side of the oort cloud to the other is about 1.5 light years. Basically, you could select a millimeter at any point on a line drawn between the surface of the earth and another point hundreds, if not thousands of star systems away, leave a marker on it, and the odds of randomly picking that point out of any other point would be dream's luck.

[@bt-a4622]

is that a green day reference

[@fbiagentmiyakohoshino8223]

jesus 1 millimeter in 2000 lyrs. thats like the visible spectrum visualized as a strand of hair compared to the distance from new york to los angeles

[@jes3788]

I feel bad for dream, he can't even go for a 5 minute walk without getting struck by lightning ten times

[@imhafzee]

He struck himself

[@mobiusone6994]

If you think that's lucky, wait until you see the five runs that were even luckier than he was by entire minutes

[@501thtrooper4]

Dont worry he will win the lottery 10 times in a row to pay for his hospital bills

[@semicolon2599]

@@mobiusone6994 which ones?

[@mobiusone6994]

@@semicolon2599 The top six for the current version of minecraft

[@ChiralCentre3366]

I feel like the Venn diagram of "People who watch Matt" and "People who have played Minecraft" has a larger overlap than you might think...

[@hellomynameisjoenl]

I wanted to say …

[@christophstahl8169]

yea... its probably a circle :)

[@Talaxianer]

*people who have played and/or still are playing Minecraft

[@Hoolahups]

Its a circle inside of a bigger circle

[@SushiElemental]

I was playing it while watching the video. How likely was that? Well, very.. I was playing while browsing my YT subscriptions.

[@PrimerBlobs]

My level of excitement when seeing a 40-minute video is a testament to how much I love your stuff.

[@youtubeuniversity3638]

Primer!!!

[@alexismandelias]

You should upload stuff after 3b1b brought you 1M subs

[@Cleath78]

Hey love your videos!

[@georgecantu856]

Yo!

[@elijahbuchanan2368]

Well, your videos are pretty similar. Mathematics and computers applied to strange real world systems.

[@charlesboudreau5350]

I love the unspoken fact throughout the video that so many shots were filmed in order to get those perfect odds-defying results, like the book throw, the consecutive ball hoops, the dice pairs falling in the results in the right order. Subtle, yet entertainingly on point.

[@XCC23]

It's a beautiful illustration of the question. Because I note that no one sees this and thinks matt legitimately did all that in one go. But it's way more believable that matt did that than Dream's result.

[@Jaburu]

how is that subtle? lol

[@TheB3]

"154 dice rolls in a row without getting a 7" Whenever the stupid robber is on my bricks in Catan, it feels like we've broken this record...

[@GDColon]

LOL i can totally relate to this one

[@Twigpi]

I feel your pain 😂

[@drachenhexer]

that's so true

[@mcvibing2785]

@@GDColon hello

[@elie_]

so glad I read your comment! You're not alone...

[@Kredige]

Given my watch history of countless Minecraft videos, and every video on both yours and Numberphile's channels, I'm sure the KZbin algorithm positively pissed itself with excitement when recommending this video to me.

[@bruciex4574]

same

[@texasranger7687]

same !

[@3Ppaatt]

Well put! I love picturing the YT algorithm as an excited little kid handing out videos at random.

[@marklemoine1634]

"WE THINK YOU'LL LIKE THIS ONE"

[@brooksbryant2478]

Same

[@RareEarthSeries]

Amazing that you got all of those on the first try

[@tracefleemangarcia8816]

Rare Earth? What kind of insane crossover episode are we in?

[@idonystudios]

I’m sorting by newest comment... Just finished your video on pyramid schemes. Can someone calculate the chances of that ahaha

[@riograndedosulball248]

Now i never imagined i would see Rare Earth commenting on a film about the probabilities of a minecraft youtuber be cheating on his speedruns

[@catleaf]

it was probably not first try...

[@SumeaBizarro]

He will be in the next GDQ!

[@AstrumG2V]

This is my 4th time watching this, and I'm now noticing how hard Matt has to keep down his excitement every time he nailed one of his trick shots 😂

[@caspervandenakker]

glad to know I'm not the only one constantly rewatching this

[@ArDeeMee]

Well, that‘s the exact feeling why we even bother with trickshots. The endorphin rush when it finally works. It‘s sooo good. =)

[@SuperYoonHo]

@@caspervandenakker me 2

[@nikolozgilles]

360 NOSCOPE

[@bhaskar08]

I thought they were two different videos rotascoped together. Because you never see his complete arm. Both are hiding below the frame and then bam, a trick shot.

[@rafigoghimarfirman3480]

"After considering this, I ended up finding out that I HAD actually been using a disallowed modification during ~6 of my live streams on Twitch.." -Dream

[@luk4aaaa]

I like how he can’t just straight up admit he fucked up and has to victimise himself a little too lmao

[@dermathze700]

@Are You Going To Do The 'Ora Ora' Thing? Yeah it takes a 50 paragraph document for him to say "Oops, I used a mod after all".

[@Ladylubber]

@@dermathze700 I just hope not too many kids fall for the “oops.” There’s no way it wasn’t intentional

[@KonoGufo]

@@Ladylubber It already happened. Look at any comment section on videos that Dream fans watch and you'll see them ALL excusing his actions because he's funny. Or trying to say that things were biased to make him look bad and that it was an honest mistake, even though it's logically impossible for him to pay for a mod that boosts his luck and then forget about it when being accused of having impossible high luck.

[@badateverything2931]

@@KonoGufo tbh im pretty sure he wrote the mod himself gotta give him credit for that

[@keyboardstalker4784]

Dream when he’s walking down the street and suddenly wins the lottery while simultaneously getting struck by lightning and then is eaten by a shark:

[@davidpark2854]

Funnily enough this has similar odds to what dream accomplished in his "speedruns"

[@jasonlewis4438]

Odds of Winning the Lottery: 1 in 302.5 Million Odds of Getting killed by a Shark: 1 in 264.1 Million Odds of Being struck by Lightning: 1 in 500,000 Multiplied Together: 1 in 2.5 * 10^23, which is just 1 order of Magnitude less likely than Dream's luck.

[@keyboardstalker4784]

@arrsea not by much, it’s actually pretty damn close.

[@DennisEldrup]

@@jasonlewis4438 Winning the lottery is definitely not "just" 1 in 302.5 Million, so you could easily pick a lottery with a more favorable chance of winning, making the original statement true. By doing that you would have made the joke better, instead of trying to ruin it :-(

[@jasonlewis4438]

@@moa-wg3bo What if he scratches a lottery ticket out while he's swimming when there's a storm going on?

[@RenatoAndrade144]

The "10 Billion Human Second Century" is one of the funniest things I've ever heard in mathematics. Also genius in how easy it is to convey to the public at large.

[@scientia4866]

totally agree :D it's a pretty good way to gain intuition!

[@jacobburr3570]

What's that mean :o

[@javierantoniosilva8477]

Hell, I'm a mathematician and it's really conveying to me.

[@Living_Murphys_Law]

As a Minecraft lover, hearing you describe the process to beat the game made me realize just how strange this game is.

[@CaptainCuttlefish74]

It's like listening to your parents try to explain your hobbies to their friends

[@notakirakarakaza2118]

To be fair, as far as video games go, "get gear, go to hell, get item, make item, go to weird hell, kill dragon" is pretty straight forward. But i do get what you mean.

[@ravingtac0896]

I remember trying to explain the plot of xenoblade to a friend, very difficult

[@eldritchomen]

​@@notakirakarakaza2118 errrrm akshually the end is probably heaven 🤓 Say that as a joke since it's up to interpretation but like if you think of it as an interpretation of a barren kinda heaven that can only support strange life truly alien to our dimension it feels way more sensible, especially bc man have you seen the MC Dungeons ender creatures??? Biblically accurate angel lookin asses one of them mfs has a FLAMING HEAD and another is COVERED IN EYES

[@NoriMori1992]

@@notakirakarakaza2118 The _details_ are weird though. Anything can sound normal if you describe it in the broadest possible way.

[@whyme943]

I actually think it's really neat that a community-run speedrunning website published a competent (at worst 'Undergrad lab paper') mathematical paper on this.

[@benjaminoechsli1941]

The care that they took with this shows how seriously they take the job, even though it's unpaid (right? I know nothing about the speedrunning community). Well done to them, and may their future endeavors flourish under that work ethic.

[@benjaminoechsli1941]

@@hammurabii.3173 Sure, I can see the speedrunners making a living off of popular games (like Minecraft!), but the mods that oversee the leaderboards don't get a share of that pot, right?

[@josejimenez896]

Speed runners are something else and I admire it. They often delve DEEP into the technical aspects of the game, in order to break certain parts of it. When I say break, I of course mean break the vanilla game so everyone is on the same and fair starting point mind you, not mods. Point is, they're often very skilled and nerdy homies. I also thought the paper was neat

[@loganmcvey3339]

@@benjaminoechsli1941 Mods don't typically get paid, but are almost always made up of people who stream themselves. For 99% of games, modding is a side hobby for streamers in the community to help continue to build the speedrunning scene.

[@TheSpecialJ11]

I've noticed this happening more and more. I think the Internet and public schools get a bad rap for making us dumber by misinforming them, and there's probably some truth to this, but I think when used for good we're seeing more and more "citizen science" by people who would have just been farmhands 150 years ago.

[@LittleFifth]

I was kinda on dream's side. But then I saw the parenthesis wasn't closed in the papers that sided with him. Unforgivable.

[@erronblack308]

I kinda think he’s stupid

[@tiredboard]

To be fair, even though in this specific context the missing parenthesis doesn't matter, a misplaced parenthesis could result in completely different equations.

[@caferace8418]

@@tiredboard I would assume a professional doing analysis for a paying customer would be more focused on details like that when dealing with math. That's ignoring someone not willing to putting their name on their work.

[@kylea.s.5544]

@@erronblack308 who? Dream?

[@brianlam5847]

You saying that a world-renowned mathematician would seriously not remember to close a parenthesis? I mean if you dedicated your life to math you would pretty much not make this kind of mistake. Face it; Dream himself wrote it to look better or the "mathematician" does not know what he is talking about.

[@Nick-78]

Dude holy crap. Like, I look at “getting 42/262 when 12/262 is the drop rate” and think “eh that’s lucky but doesn’t seem insane” until you actually do the math on it. That’s bonkers.

[@XCC23]

Yeah. The intuition that's important to have is that doubling the amount of trials obviously doubles the mean, but it doesn't double the standard deviation (how much we expect something to vary) It only multiplies that by the *square root* of two. So when if you have *four* times the amount of trials, you only get twice the deviation, even though the mean is four times as big. So suddenly this relatively small deviation (in absolute terms) becomes a completely unsurmountable mountain.

[@androsp9105]

@@XCC23 I know you're right but intuitively it still feels like the odds should be similar to getting 4/26 when you expect 1/26.

[@polendri4812]

Funny thing is, that same intuition is why we know about the cheating: the hacker knew they couldn't make things TOO lucky, but they used their intuition instead of crunching the numbers and they inadvertently made a change drastic enough to expose them. What this makes me wonder about is how many other, smarter cheaters may be out there, manipulating game probabilities just by a standard deviation here and there, gaining an edge while maintaining plausible deniability.

[@XCC23]

@@Alec____ how many heads do you expect to get if you flip a coin once? 0.5 If you flip a coin 100 times? 50.

[@nyahnyahson523]

@@polendri4812 Well, you do have to keep in mind that for every game they play they need to make sure the standard deviation is going to even out. If Dream had used the hack for a small amount of runs, it easily could've been chalked down to luck.

[@FuneFox]

that mathematician dream hired is the equivalent of a lawyer having to defend someone who committed murder in front of the judge.

[@flouride]

not really

[@gyanprakash7445]

@@flouride technoblade is burning in hell btw

[@nubs2234]

@@gyanprakash7445 nice bot

[@skipelen]

@@gyanprakash7445 fr

[@gyanprakash7445]

@@nubs2234 cope

[@samtarver8446]

It's interesting that he probably only increased his odds by a little bit, thinking it wouldn't be noticed, but forgetting that when you do things a lot of times, even a small increase in chances has a large statistical impact

[@bruschetta7711]

Excel and taking simple data is so useful, it does make you see how incredibly impossible is what Dream has done

[@Packbat]

The funny thing is, the situation in which it *wouldn't* have a large statistical impact is ... the situation in which it wouldn't have any noticeable impact at all. Which, if Dream intentionally modified the game, would make that act of cheating kind of a waste of time - why bother if you can't even tell the difference?

[@boiledelephant]

I strongly recommend Karl Jobst's video on Dream's semi-confession. It's fascinating. There's a plausible theory that he had modified his Minecraft for practise and didn't know he was *still* using a modified version when he streamed. It raises an eyebrow but honestly he makes a compelling (and very nuanced) argument on the possible interpretations of what is now known.

[@zomgneedaname]

Thanks for summarising this video for me

[@supernova743]

A slight increase in odds wont go noticed in a single run, the problem he had here was he kept using the mods run after run. In an unmodded game you're going to end up with extremely good luck and extremely bad luck in games. He effectively removed the bad luck games getting to his perfect game much faster and with less effort.

[@SKFSTETSHT]

Imagine getting odds better then if ever human for a century speedran the game and only getting 4th fastest run in the world

[@danielf.7151]

Tbf, he had some bad luck with the end portal. Before that, he was on WR pace.

[@xdjrockstar]

@@danielf.7151 that's a shame, he should've set the portal's spawn to be closer

[@cheesylasagna823]

@@danielf.7151 He couldn't have gotten world record even if the eye didn't break, would've been like a 15 or 16 min time

[@allesiao]

Thats probably what he wanted, the cheating would be obvious if he would have set the WR

[@hunterdog4365]

Lol true

[@burnttoast6974]

I was never very invested in the drama, but I used to believe it really was just some insane luck. The “Ten Billion Human Second Century” changed that

[@tanvirss8814]

What's that?

[@burnttoast6974]

@@tanvirss8814 he talks about it at 29:00

[@bruhpolice3463]

@@moodymud it doesn't really matter if its just been invented, in the same way if I use a light Eon as a unit of measurement, it may not be recognized as a unit of measurement but you are able of extracting actual information from that unit, its the same with the 10 Billion human second century, it's just a way of putting something into perspective

[@adlhrtzucgfh1325]

The huge sample biase is never resolved though. I could go to the family of the smartest person alive (similar ridiculous likelihood) and then say I chose 1 person out of 5 that were there at the family meeting. If I consider all 5 its not less ridiculous, so this person cannot exist, even if he is in front of you. similar youd have to pick all the minecraft runs there ever were.

[@googleuser7771]

@@adlhrtzucgfh1325 ok let's do it. Roughly how many runs do you think there have been? 3 × 10^19 maybe?

[@krisdoesart9643]

I love the concept of the 10 billion human second century, it's a really great way to put kind of abstract seeming, difficult to comprehend odds into perspective

[@qwertyTRiG]

I did a search to see whether this is being discussed elsewhere, and found that there's a singer called Matt Parker who has a song called "Dream".

[@Olegach21]

Talk about piggybacking on success

[@qwertyTRiG]

@@Olegach21 Eh, I've also found three musicians called Tom Scott.

[@ashleycrow8867]

WOW what are the odds?

[@stewartzayat7526]

@@ashleycrow8867 like 1 in 10^19 or something

[@audreyrasmussen540]

Oh yeah, CCM producer/songwriter Matt Parker. Makes me laugh, sometimes.

[@GBloxers]

"What I'm saying is, if every single human in existence was doing a speedrun of Minecraft every single second around the clock-- every human doing it!-- for a century, the odds are still you would never see a result anywhere near what Dream got." That settles it then.

[@MCXL1140]

It would take a thousand centuries for us to be pretty reasonably confident that it would happen.

[@MCXL1140]

@@Lowdian welcome to purgatory.

[@DemonixTB]

@@Lowdian only if they completed each speedrun attempt in 1 second

[@Anzuo]

It's even crazier, because every human would have to produce 6 Livestreams every second too

[@chrism45]

@@DemonixTB The fastest current time to leave the nether after completing all trades is 8:45 by Pluginl. It could be improved but that's a bit longer than 1 second.

[@samuelwolfe]

As a person who has played Minecraft from basically the very beginning, and also a regular viewer who has a deep amateur interest in math(s), this video is twice as good for me as usual.

[@SlimyDash]

I KNOW RIGHT

[@d2factotum]

Ah, the very beginning, the days when if you wanted to mine for resources you wanted to be darned sure to do it on one side of the (0,0) point, because the map generation was bugged and put fewer resources on the other side...

[@herscher1297]

Which version is 'from the beginning'

[@potatoonastick2239]

Alpha gang

[@sponge1234ify]

F o r u m g a n g

[@guildmenu9697]

just for perspective, for the 10 billion human second century thing, it would have to take roughly 650.22 centuries for just a SINGLE occurrence of what happened to dream.

[@actually_tes1]

How did you work that out? (just curious have yet to take a class in statistics)

[@XCC23]

@@actually_tes1 it's actually just almost straight arithmetic at that point. The probability of getting Dream's result is about 1:2*10^22. The 10BHSC is about 3*10^19 By multiplying these two numbers (raw probability and number of attempts) you get a new expected value, which is something along the lines of 1:650 (1:666 with the numbers I just provided) So you're going to need 650 of those centuries to expect it to happen once. Or alternately for attempts to be even faster. Or the population to be higher.

[@Skorpyotnt]

Well and if we factor in that it takes more than 1 second to do all the accounted livestreams it would take a couple trillion years for a single occurence. Considering the age of universe we still have a couple of trillion years to go.

[@gladosbutstupid8807]

@@XCC23 🤓🤓🤓 Nah i’m joking but still kinda sounds nerdy

[@stinkopung2914]

@@gladosbutstupid8807 so you mean someone doing maths is sounding nerdy? What are the odds of that?

[@Klockorino]

This controversy has spawned some of the most interesting crossovers I’ve ever watched

[@ifyoureplytomeyouregay4293]

Next person is Neil degrass Tyson blabbering over it

[@jeypi__]

u seem familiar

[@abrahamlincoln9758]

If it please the court, I would like to admit into evidence, exhibit A: Timothy Dexter read about him. he was the living proof.

[@Justaguywholikes69]

Why did I read that how yoda talks 🤦

[@geckoguy4141]

It's so cool to see! It honestly reminds me of that time when a bunch of history youtubers dunked on Matpat and his inaccurate For Honor video.

[@VeritasGames]

I'm so glad someone finally did a proper, clear, succinct, and entertaining explanation of this. Props mate!

[@TRW4.0]

its so obv fake same with his man hunt vids ffs i dont hate on him i just enjoy his vids but its obv fake and yall dont want to belive that.

[@nikolessard6860]

hi bud just watched all your hot guns vids

[@c1a046]

@@TRW4.0 so probability is fake? It was really just pure math, how can it be fake?

[@TRW4.0]

@@c1a046 he ajusted the probability in the scripts of minecraft?? bit obv

[@itsjustleo3371]

@@TRW4.0 Dream has literally said that they take multiple tries to get the most exciting manhunt, it's not scripted. It's literally left up to probability of about how many tries it takes to get a good take lmao.

[@Belial-jv5tq]

Thank you Dream for cheating and letting me find this incredible channel which also made Numberphile and Sixty Symbols pop up on my recommended, and now I can't stop watching and learning.

[@EmilyYebananapie]

This is the best comment I read today. WELCOME TO THE BEST SIDE OF KZbin

[@CaseyShontz]

Gotta love a good math communicator

[@aji_jacobson]

I found Matt through numberphile a couple years ago and love them both! Would also recommend Steve Mold for more general science vids in a similar style to Matt's. PS Careful about numberphile's video on why 1+2+3...=-1/12, that video has caused more controversy in the math world than Dream could ever hope to.

[@mikew1990hello]

Fantastic channels

[@TheSuperKingLP]

Cry about it.

[@expensivecrayon]

The 10 billion human second century is brilliant. Really illustrated the point so clearly and made it possible to conceptualist such extreme odds

[@The_Horizon]

Lol, he recently admitted he faked it

[@elusivepotato7922]

Lmao

[@yehwat527]

Lmao I just saw that on google too

[@aswinkrishna5042]

Yo Go make more dupes

[@aidan7913]

hello gamer, glad to see you here!

[@austindurkin8974]

Well it took long enough, but better late than never I suppose

[@Cream147player]

The analogy of hitting a target with a randomly thrown dart vs drawing a target around a dart that has already been thrown is a very useful one for discussing probabilities, I will definitely be using it myself.

[@digitig]

Known as the "Texas sharpshooter fallacy", in case you want to look up more detail.

[@Cream147player]

@@digitig wow, that is also a great name!

[@Chlorate299]

The ten billion human second century needs a much better name, how about "Parker's limit"?

[@NoName-zn1sb]

!!

[@FunnyAnimatoFilms]

YES

[@kenosando]

As long as it doesn't carry the same hex as Parker's Square.

[@daveschroeter]

Parker's Limit Can't Lose

[@ZayulRasco]

Someone make the Wikipedia article

[@GaidinBDJ]

Just a note on the odds on those craps runs because your math ends up off because of it. The 154 roll streak was without crapping out (losing) *not* without rolling a 7. There could (almost certainly were) 7's in that run. It could have even been literally all 7's. The number for the losing roll varies depending on the phase of the game you're in. One "game" of craps consists of one or two phases. You start with a "coming out" roll. If you roll a 7 or 11 you win immediately. If you roll a 2, 3, or 12, you lose immediately. If you roll 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, or 10 that becomes your "point" and you enter the second phase. In the second phase, you win if you roll your point number before rolling a 7 and lose if you roll a 7.

[@villyintheflesh]

Thanks for clearing that up. I remember trying to learn how to play craps once and couldnt get my head around it, but it definitely was more complex than how it was described in the video

[@ekki1993]

Wait, so they were counted as 154 rolls, which would be less than 154 rounds, right? And it sounds like every roll has a smaller chance of making you lose immediately than just "not rolling 7", so the real chances would be slightly higher than what Matt calculated.

[@EebstertheGreat]

Correction: a shooter's hand in craps doesn't end until the shooter sevens out. If they crap out, pass bets lose and don't pass bets win (except that don't pass pushes on a 12), but the hand continues. The actual probability of rolling at least 154 times in a single hand works out to be about 1.788 824 26 × 10⁻¹⁰, or 1 in 5 590 264 100. If crapping out ended the hand immediately, the odds would be closer to those calculated in the video, since every roll would have either a 1/6 or 5/36 chance of ending the hand. Instead, it's either 1/6 or 0. *Reference* Ethier, S. N. & Hoppe, F. (2010). A world record in Atlantic City and the length of the shooter’s hand at craps. The Mathematics Intelligencer, 32(4), 44-48.

[@alexfall862]

"As an expert in getting things wrong" The Parker Square will follow this man to his grave.

[@olik136]

a grave that is almost a perfect rectangle... almost (*not sure what a perfect rectangle actually would be...)

[@brendanmccabe8373]

@@olik136 a square

[@ViliamF.]

pretty sure he'll have it on gravestone. either engraved or graffiti-ed.

[@Frahamen]

@@olik136 I'll say it's a plane figure with four perfectly straight sides and four perfectly right angles.

[@lichansan1750]

And also made him (more) famous

[@mtndew314]

I just wanna know how many times he successfully did one of those "lucky shots" but flubbed the voice line and had to redo it.

[@akshaydalvi1534]

Long enough to grow a beard apparently 😂😂

[@insane_troll]

Well he did call a binomial distribution normal in the last part.

[@bentroyer1]

It's dubbing.

[@dustyoverstreet648]

patreon bro

[@fuckugplus]

after effect.....

[@jonathanjavier7555]

I know I am a bit late. But I love how, Matt gave Dream, the highest benefit of the doubt, by giving him 10 billion instead of the *calculated* 7.9 billion population (in 2021) and still Dream was orders of magnituted luckier than all of them.

[@nathandts3401]

Wouldn't have made a difference. The two billion extra wouldn't have changed the numbers in any meaningful way.

[@ddillybar1]

More than a benefit of the doubt, these numbers are ridiculously in Dream's favor. If 10 billion people each killed 305 blazes and made 262 barters every second of every day for 100 years, there is still only a 1/1000 chance that even a single person would have matched or beaten Dream's luck. Dream is but a single person playing over maybe a couple of dozen hours at most.

[@B3Band]

The population of the world is estimated. Maybe the estimate uses a calculation. But it's a bit misleading to say we calculated the actual population of the world and somehow got exactly 7,900,000,000

[@MorganDade]

@@B3Band 7.9 billion and exactly 7,900,000,000 are completely different levels of precision. 7,900,000,000 plus or minus almost 50,000,000 is still 7.9 billion, but it is not 7,900,000,000.

[@deepdowndistortion]

That is because you guys haven't factored in the population of the lost city of Atlantis.

[@AMac8311]

Fun fact: assuming there are 7.5e^18 grains of sand in the world (google), it is more likely that two people would randomly pick the exact same grain of sand out of every one on earth than what Dream did.

[@jacobp8294]

I handed my dumbass cousin the same grain of sand what's that mean genius?

[@AshifKhan-sn6jx]

Idk if the above commenter is saying truth but its more like this Imagine two aliens on space looking at earth The first alien closes his eyes And the second alien lands in a random spot in earth in his spaceship and marks it The second alien comes back and blinds himself and the first alien picks the same grain of from the entire earth and mark it

[@lord_ozymandias]

@@jacobp8294op specified randomly

[@ih21180]

@@jacobp8294 he talked about this principle of what youve said in the video, with the dart out of the plane

[@Dwight511]

But... what if it does happen?

[@scottdriggers8400]

As a long time dream and matt parker viewer, "Don't brigade me Dream stans" is a sentence I never expected to hear out of Matt Parker's mouth

[@tomaszrasolomampionona5609]

Timestamps for all lucky shots: 0:12 Dart 1 6:39 Basket 1.1 6:45 Basket 1.2 9:42 Basket 2.1 9:47 Basket 2.2 9:53 Basket 2.3 10:10 Basket 2.4 17:16 Book 23:30 Dice 31:51 Pins 36:20 Dart 2 38:05 Basket

[@thereaperandthesheep9186]

Thanks, also u forgot the book one at 17:16

[@amaze2n]

@@thereaperandthesheep9186 the book one is just crazy.

[@raulf.duarte1856]

23:30 dice

[@lerdodetejada]

This needs to get to the top!

[@joelhoeve]

36:20 Dart

[@thehoodedteddy1335]

This is why you get a disinterested expert. They can explain it in a way that is simplified and not tripping over himself trying to justify himself.

[@Mswordx23]

And it helps that they aren't literally paid to pick a side like a certain astrophysicist.

[@Rpahut1]

Except there wouldn't be material for a video, and half a million views, if he went with "Dream just got lucky" theory. No internet figure feeding of this drama is truly disenterested.

[@originalrice7004]

@@Rpahut1 he just said in the video that of course he is interested in the controversy, but he is disinterested in who is right

[@CraftsmanOfAwsomenes]

@@Rpahut1 Are we at the "constructing conspiracy theories for why people who know what they're talking about would lie to make dream look bad" stage of bargaining at this point?

[@huunterr]

@bobin the boggart The issue is that the Speedrun mods offered to hire a statistician to review their paper, but Dream said no specifically *because* the statistician would be biased in favor of their client. After the mods offered to choose a statistician that Dream agreed on, Dream declined. And then hired his own anonymous statistician. From a website that was created just months prior. With no page listing their employees, or even verifying their existence. So it’s not simply that Dream hired his own statistician. The point is that he hired them *after* stating they would be biased.

[@oliknight2223]

This video is now mentioned on Dream's wikipedia page!

[@PersonMan000]

Hearing Matt say the words "Ender Pearl" and "Blaze Rods" is a strange phenomenon.

[@areh3918]

Gamer grandpa

[@theairaccumulator7144]

@@areh3918 Stand-up gaming

[@Fedico7000]

I don't know who this is and even I can tell that it sounds weird when he talks about games.

[@Eclipsed_Archon]

what are the chances XD

[@JobroskiSwaqqman]

If you check the description, he has a Minecraft consultant lol.

[@kelvinw.1423]

Respect for the MC Speedrunning Team for making a 29 page formal investigation

[@eekee6034]

Yes, and Matt for understanding why instead of just complaining.

[@euanstokes2828]

Yeah it may not be the perfect paper, but man they put the effort in, and that's incredibly admirable.

[@ahmednishaal9432]

Tbh that first paper was better than what most of us could have provided

[@mayo4507]

That's kinda what you have to do when a KZbinr has actual stans

[@fort809]

@@mayo4507 lol the paper didn’t matter to Dream’s fans, he just said “their math is wrong and they’re evil clout chasers” and the 10 year olds believed him. Facts don’t matter to DSMP fans

[@brunnomenxa]

10:12 The smile of someone who won't need to record the lines again.

[@Papaconstantopoulos]

My exact thought

[@N.Nocturne]

My exact thought

[@dontklickme6455]

My exact thought

[@eden7537]

My exact thought

[@Nonartrach]

I love potatos

[@hungrybox]

One of the best videos on all of KZbin

[@DrowningKraken]

Not someone I expected to see here at all. Love you Hungrybox!

[@snspi1]

yea

[@WhirlwindHeatAndFlash]

JIGGLY! 💮

[@CasuallyShadow]

Truly, one of THE videos of all time

[@Bub98]

YOOOO no way

[@-42-47]

Dream: Damn those odds are really unlikely *googles "astronomical odds expert"*

[@zh9664]

What?

[@VideoMask93]

@@zh9664 He's supposing Dream found his unnamed mathematician by searching for an expert in "astronomical odds," expecting to get someone who specialized in odds that are astronomical in the sense of being very high, but instead getting a guy who's into odds related to astronomy...because.

[@tuxedosteve9556]

@@VideoMask93 but the guy only had like two mistakes from what I heard

[@him6008]

@@tuxedosteve9556 2 mistakes is too much

[@Terrik240]

@@tuxedosteve9556 Mistakes aren't acceptable, and aren't the same as margin of error. Margin of error covers how much your number could differ from reality due to everything from cosmic interference to human error. A mistake is an incorrect calculation, and has no place in a paper.

[@TeaDrinkingGuy]

As a guy doing a maths degree who has played Minecraft for over a decade, I’ve never found a video more fitting to my interests

[@guillaume6373]

Check out Matthew Bolan if you're interested in both - he goes in-depth into the maths behind minecraft eg. how is terrain generated

[@briano9397]

Lol

[@duckcluck123]

mafs*

[@DinnerForkTongue]

@@guillaume6373 I wonder, did he help with finding the pack.png or title screen worlds?

[@terryrexford6335]

That slight smile he gives when he realizes he got the take.

[@cameronvalencia6023]

No no as a S-U M stan, I can 100% with certainty confirm that was his first try attempt, he is simply that lucky. Ur a negative h8r looking for clout. It's possible among millions of ppl to throw a dart at a board that one will get it on their first try. Have u not seen endgame? Its possible. (Wow that felt terrible, this is just a joke)

[@user-cm1mc4qv1e]

@@cameronvalencia6023 had me in the first half.. haha.

[@ez_is_bloo]

@@cameronvalencia6023 I can literally see a 12 year old typing that lmao

[@gfehk2528]

well its a magnet so

[@MrSayines]

Maybe there is a second person off camera grabbing the ball he throw when it goes offcam and drop a second ball off cam in the basket :D.

[@vampire-riley]

this video is older now but having the book land when you flip it behind you at 17:15 is SUCH a great touch when you just finished debunking the incredibly low possibilities of this being an honest speedrun lmaooo

[@pangalactictuber]

And he continues with another minute of commentary without even a microexpression of excitement that he got the book to land.

[@hahhah42speedruns]

As someone brought here through the speedrunning side of things, I've gotta say that I can always appreciate anyone who knows the difference between "disinterested" and "uninterested".

[@suicideistheanswer369]

you made me notice the difference

[@Mr_Doogz]

I feel kinda stupid. What is the dif actually?

[@Mr_Doogz]

Does disinterested mean you were interested and lost interest and uninterested mean you just were never interested?

[@hahhah42speedruns]

​@@Mr_Doogz "Disinterested" means impartial, free of bias. It's derived from "interest" in the sense of having a financial stake in something. So if you're disinterested in some dispute, it means you have no stake in the outcome, no ties to either party. You're a neutral observer.

[@Mr_Doogz]

@@hahhah42speedruns wow that's a subtle difference. Thanks for telling me

[@tweedyburd007]

My Data class in University recommended this video for us to watch as to how to detect cheating. This entire story is hilarious, especially since he fought back against actual professors and used misleading data. He's such a textbook example of cheating, lmfao.

[@seinfan9]

You should watch Karl Jobst's recent investigation into the digital papertrail of communication between Dream, the mods, the person he reached out to to make an analysis, the company that made the mod for his casual streams... There is a strong case that given the circumstances, he actually may be genuinely telling the truth about his fundamental defense of not knowingly using a mod that altered the drop rates. The guy's behavior isn't "textbook." The amount of hours and money he poured into fighting the allegations, eventually caving in to try and stop the bleeding of his already tarnished irreparable reputation. The facts of the story lining up to the surface level depiction of the situation is mathematically impossible in and of itself. It's really a fascinating piece of journalism by Karl.

[@matthewbertrand4139]

@@seinfan9 imagine being dreampilled smh couldn't be me

[@TheRealZeke2003]

@@matthewbertrand4139 Lol he's just bringing nuance into the convo. You should actually watch the video it's really good.

[@Zezam_]

Aunt may does and everyone forgets peter in the end. Andrew Garfield saves MJ and the post credit scene is a doctor strange trailer. And venom goes back to his universe leaving a bit of symbiote behind.

[@ibuyfriends4467]

@@Zezam_ Are you okay?

[@soranuareane]

Here's a kicker I haven't seen mentioned (probably because I haven't looked hard enough): modifying the loot tables is trivially easy. Minecraft natively supports datapacks and it's very easy to masquerade a datapack as vanilla (or, original to the game). People who have spent time writing Minecraft mods (myself included) have modified these configuration files quite a bit. It's more than the odds being practically impossible, it's the ease of which such cheating could have occurred.

[@ceruchi2084]

But Minecraft's naïvety is part of its charm :D . It wasn't a game designed to be speedrun or played competitively. It's a sandbox, and so I'm glad they make modding so easy! (This coming from a vanilla player who doesn't even have Optifine haha.)

[@Steph-3979]

This is true. Especially when you consider that a lot of Dream's content has been based around Minecraft But... challenges that either he or his best friend coded themselves. He's familiar enough with Minecraft code to easily hide something that trivial.

[@Muhsigbokz]

Up you go good person, it's very important to keep this in mind.

[@kugelblitzingularity304]

Just saying, if it is dream, he would go above and beyond to achieve sth. Even if it's hard, he would have found a way to modify the game lol.

[@mynameis7062]

He proved that there weren’t even any data packs

[@szilvianagy2410]

I can't believe whilst procrastinating on tomorrow's advanced math exam I accidentally come across a video that helped me actually learn binomial distribution and probability calculations 😅 a topic which I skipped cause I didn't attend the classes where it was taught LOL Thanks. Will definitely come back for more videos maybe i'll learn some stuff whilst procrastinating 😅😂

[@GodZefir]

There we go, the cheating actually made something good happen.

[@warmike]

how did you do on the exam?

[@RajasPoorna]

What was the probability of that happening? 😂

[@WJS774]

@@RajasPoorna Depends on what other videos he was watching to make the algorithm feed him this one.

[@GSPV33]

There's something heartwarming about knowing you from Numberphile content 10 years ago, and still seeing you popping up with relevant content now. Feels like old friends from my childhood that inspired a lot of my passions growing up.

[@Burbie]

He is from numberphile ? I did not know that !

[@trashmouse0524]

I love his Parker square video XD

[@sirploom]

@@trashmouse0524 loooooool the Parker Square

[@siggelindell1931]

He inspired you to becoming a drug kingpin?

[@ManoleitorArg]

Get a life

[@neku2741]

This video is basically a "Dude Perfect" video with less yelling.

[@benp.865]

an more math

[@a17waysJackinn]

*Binomial Distribution*

[@duckface1038]

I came into the comments to see all the dream stans arguing before I watched the video and I was very confused when I saw this comment

[@Mirolp7]

Just imagine Dude perfect got his perfect shot... AND THEN start doing the maths how likley the stunt whatsoever was to happen. lmao.

[@dr.doppeldecker3832]

And without the obnoxious music...

[@etymologynerd.]

Theory: This video was just an excuse for Matt to film a Dude Perfect video.

[@Notheggerwarsauber]

I calculated the probability of this to around 99.99999899939993999909998889988899779001%

[@JamilKhan-hk1wl]

Dude perfect are not because of being lucky but skill and taking many many attempts

[@macbookpro3098]

@O.W.I what u refer to?

[@VUO4E]

@@JamilKhan-hk1wl skill? LOL. Time to waste, and lot's of it.

[@ari_wastaken]

@@JamilKhan-hk1wl many many attempts because they need to get lucky

[@Paul-et7wt]

I think this video is up for ‘most complete content on KZbin’ awards. It’s beautiful. It’s funny. It’s clever. It’s magnificent. Congratulations Matt.

[@claypage1089]

A mathematician who knows the difference between "uninterested" and "disinterested." That alone is impressive.

[@menopriezvisko94]

hmm what is the difference? sorry i am not native speaker

[@augur8261]

Why should that even matter?

[@mavenYGO]

@@menopriezvisko94 uninterested means your don’t care/not interested. Disinterested means you have no stakes in it, as in he’s not involved in the community whatsoever. Which is why he says he’s disinterested but also interested

[@claypage1089]

@@augur8261 In my experience, most math teachers have poor English skills, and most English teachers are bad at math. Not always the case, but more times than not.

[@matthewjohnson5191]

@@claypage1089 They might not get structure correct at the same level, but specific words and roots are still essential regardless. Un and Dis are simply useful prefixes rather than anything to do with structure.

[@Makzul78]

Can we agree that "10 Billion Human Second Century" should instead be called Parker Odds?

[@zidanez21]

I think we have enough power as an audience to do that

[@shambhav9534]

Yeah, let's do that. Who will make a Wikipedia page?

[@squelchedotter]

@@shambhav9534 We'd need someone to publish it in a paper or some other publication

[@davidgustavsson4000]

@@squelchedotter I suggest that someone takes the opportunity to make it one of those one-word articles: ``` \title{How unlikely would an event have to be to have a 50/50 chance if occuring if every human tried for it once a second for a century?} \subtitle{A new method for judging likelihoods of human accomplishments} \subsubtitle{The Parker probability} \begin{document} \maketitle \begin{equation}\label{p} ... \end{equation} Very (see eq. ef{p}). \end{document}

[@davidgustavsson4000]

@James R It felt natural. I skipped the actual math though because I'm on my phone.

[@B3Band]

"I wasn't cheating" "Well, I was cheating, but I didn't know I was cheating" "Well, I knew I was cheating, but I thought someone else set up the cheats for me"

[@domenpodlesnik7599]

And people still forgave him.

[@mikimosky4109]

🤢

[@mhelvens]

@@domenpodlesnik7599 Sure, it's fine to forgive him, and to enjoy his content. Just from now on, don't trust him to be honest about stuff like this. 🤷‍♂️

[@noxXxnocti]

@@mhelvens Dream also has accused another speed runner of cheating. He was proven wrong but to this day has refused to retract his accusation or admit he was wrong.

[@ThePenisMan]

@@crypt5129 I really don’t think that video is as definitive as it presented itself to be. Don’t get me wrong, love karl and his work, but this topic is still heavily up for debate. It shed a lot of light on stuff not talked about often, but a lot of the evidence was FROM the guy being accused, hearsay, and inferences. Which is valid pieces of evidence, but there’s still room for plausible doubt I think my biggest problem though is the defense of his reaction to the problem near the end. There is no excuse for how much of a manchild dream was, and the amount of neglect he had for the moderators well being and his fan base’s rabid attacks. He has way too much influence than he knows what to do with and he can’t responsibly handle it

[@vonriel1822]

I enjoy coming back to this one every so often because of how evergreen this video is. Despite being focused on what is now a years-old, and largely resolved, controversy, the core of what he's teaching us about throughout the entire thing is just as relevant today as it was then. The inherently suspicious nature of maths chaff, a simple tool of comparison for how likely a thing is in our universe, even simple things like how to understand scientific notation. It's a true masterpiece of a video, and the level of effort that must have gone into it really shines through. And not just because of the impossible shots he made in the background - though, every time I come back, I do wonder how the probabilities of the various shots he took match up to Dream's theoretical odds.

[@ScoRPy22]

You know I was trying to understand why I keep coming back to this video. Now I know.

[@jaideepshekhar4621]

Same. :)

[@JenkinsJimmy]

Well said

[@Zexx4]

So using Math, he basically "confirmed" everyones suspicion...the odds of Dream getting pearls and rods that fast are not 0, but boy it's the closest thing to 0

[@angelodc1652]

Basically, not zero, but it might as well be

[@paulsd9255]

As close to the asymptote as possible

[@MCXL1140]

If every person on the planet lived for a thousand centuries, (that's like pre-development of homo sapiens, to 500,000 ad?) And all those billions of vampires did, in a constant purgatory, was speed running Minecraft over and over. we would expect that one of them would have the experience that dream did... Probably. Lol.

[@wilandren65]

I think this is a lot like intelligent life. It is incredibly rare (by what we know) so it would be extremely unlikely for us to be here. But since we ARE here that kind of messes everything up. If the odds are 1/100000000 then that would mean that us being here could look like “cheating” but since we are here no math could dispute the fact.

[@Anankin12]

ε>0 is the closest thing to 0

[@schishwah3754]

A little bit of extra context: that 4th place run that Dream had was actually ON PACE for world record. He got to the end portal and, ironically, had bad luck with the number of pearls that were already in the portal. He then had to spend a few minutes scavenging the area for additional pearls. Good video Matt.

[@bruciex4574]

this seems like very important information, because why would you fake a failed run

[@schishwah3754]

@@bruciex4574 yeah so the idea is, with modified weighted totals for these drops, he was set to get the world record at the time (I don’t know the specific details however it was by a significant margin). But when the time came to solidify the run, since these speedruns have so many factors and randomness involved, he was stopped by the randomness of the end portal itself since it included less than average pearls. Edit: it didn’t contain less than average pearls, but it did take awhile to find the extra pearl needed to complete the portal

[@schishwah3754]

@@bruciex4574 it’s also important to note for anyone not familiar with the process, the 6 streams identified included dozens of runs. It’s not just a one-and-done process. The pearls and rod drops are notorious as being run killers, taking up so much time doing something that requires no skill and all luck where the goal is to just be lucky. But obviously if you keep rolling a loaded die over and over again, it becomes more apparent.

[@bruciex4574]

@@schishwah3754 just to be clear, with "loaded die" you're talking about the change in ender pearl drop rates because of pearl stopping, right?

[@schishwah3754]

@@bruciex4574 assuming the actual rates were changed or manipulated, it becomes more apparent the more you call on that same event. If you rolled a 6 sided die 600 times, for a fair die you would expect to roll a ‘6’ about 100 times. If instead you rolled it 600 times and had gotten ‘6’ 300 times, it would call into question the fairness of the die. If the die was indeed loaded, then that fact becomes more apparent.

[@rickyrico80]

I'm following this channel for so long now I've actually seen your hair doing a 180 on camera.

[@emmata98]

relateable :D

[@cykwan8534]

been here since the domino computer babeeee

[@kaustubhh8466]

Wait for the 360 no looker

[@atomiccritter6492]

LOL

[@RandyHawkeye]

This video is especially fun to watch after seeing the one with Hannah Fry on Bayesian statistics where Matt repeatedly fails to throw a ball onto a table. But now, he *very mysteriously* cannot miss a target! Also, the explanation of the math is superb.

[@SadeN_0]

26:00 I dunno man, 6 craps per hour sounds like something you should discuss with your doctor

[@Rre-u1k]

Omg this is so stupid , but why am I laughing ;-;. Get outta here

[@catfort.dragon]

I remember when I had diarrhea and I had to go to the loo 6 times within an hour

[@bushmg1061]

MissScribbles same

[@cuckoo_head]

_what even is this comment thread_

[@nameconflicted7489]

im dying

[@Klick404]

This controversy deserves to be in "Humble Pi" with how its been handled by everyone else. I'm glad you could get into it and clear it up (Also, your beard looks awesome)

[@Iwasneverevenhere]

my favorite thing about the dream controversy is seeing a bunch of non-minecraft youtubers with non-minecraft audiences explain just enough about minecraft to somewhat understand the speedrun

[@ryanjansen3229]

hahahaha i also love this aspect of it

[@Torrild]

Yes, being a cross between the math and Minecraft community this was a was interesting video

[@jonny_sm884]

is that a fellow dragoon fan? :)

[@BlueCyann]

Same! I wanna see him take on bastion strats now. Gimme an analysis of the new manhunt route for housing and why it's better than the dip route on bridge pls.

[@farshnuke]

I failed maths GCSE in secondary school and had to redo it in college where I barely passed. I understand on an intellectual level that maths is genuinely beautiful in its order and magical in its ability to be strange and chaotic. It is the backbone of science that I love and the lore behind scifi sometimes relies upon maths to backfill the details from the stuff made up on the fly to suit stories. I am talking here about how nerds know how warp drive works, how fast the different ships go in different eras and how many shuttles and torpedoes Voyager had and used. The maths isn't what you do but it's there as a background. Then there's the maths of how games like Minecraft are coded. How you can enter the same seed and the world will generate in the same way (at least to a certain extent. I'm not sure if there comes a point where the generation has built on generation enough that two worlds with the same seed are different). I have been watching videos from James Hoffman this past Christmas about coffee and that involves maths, videos about chemistry from Nile red and that involves maths. On a more practical level I've been playing Fallout 4 with mods and had to come up against the mathematical limitations of the code and my machine. All this to say I am bad at maths and while I respect its role in the things I love I hate it because I suck st it. The first time I can remember having a panic attack it was because I was in an advanced GCSE class about some kind of maths and my impression was that we were being told to divide in a way that made numbers bigger and my brain could not cope. In hindsight it was probably phrasing i.e. that if you cut a log in half say you end up with two bits of wood so it's phrasing as dividing but was actually multiplication. At the time my brain just melted down. I came to this video for the Minecraft but not knowing or caring who Dream is and not liking maths. I loved the video and you explained it well. Though my idiot brain still says that it doesn't seem that unlikely to get drops that to my idiot brain don't feel that egregious. I am bad at maths so I know I am wrong but it's interesting that even after my video my brain is going "I don't know though..." Lol i like what you said about it being the difference between deliberately throwing a dart from a plane to hit a bullseye and throwing a dart from the plane, it landing point down and you then drawing a bullseye around it because as someone bad about maths I only know about probability when it's improbable. Stories are not written about the predictable. Videos are not made talking about the usual so to my brain a once in a lifetime occurrence feels like it happens regularly. I've watched ocean liner and engineering disaster videos where the videos are made because the metaphorical dart from the plane landed face down where a bullseye could be drawn. They were random spikes in the broth of chaos that happens all the time but were singled out as different from the broth and my perception of plausibility comes from seeing so many of these rare spikes. Tldr great video subscribed

[@gaminggeckos4388]

Soooo... 10 billion times luckier than the luckiest gambler ever recorded, huh?

[@1088lol]

i must be dreaming forsenCD

[@thisuserdoesnotexist478]

@@1088lol I had a dream forsenCD , welcome to the champion club

[@John.Diaper]

YES

[@jameshollingsworth3005]

Nah, just extremely cracked at the craft. Definitely no cheating here ;)

[@technomage6736]

Lol 🤣 It's terrible!

[@lfchjort]

Matt: "If you're here for the Minecraft, I'll explain the math clearly. If you're here for the math, I'll explain the Minecraft clearly." Me: I'm only here for the beard

[@ijones36]

The one thing not explained clearly

[@asamenechbayissa553]

And u can see it clearly :)

[@Lord_Phoenix95]

It's a beautiful beard and I only just got recommend this vid.

[@thegamematt7536]

Then he’ll explain- oh wait

[@mble]

Me: I'm here for Minecraft and for the math, what then?

[@paulabunions]

"I absolutely agree with their point that 'probability calculations are hard'" Absolutely incredible burn

[@sanjivinsmoke2719]

Gonna need the entire ocean for that..

[@robertwiesner6825]

i don't think it's a burn as they totally are insanely hard since when you make a mistake it's almost impossible to figure out what the mistake was

[@jongyon7192p]

@@robertwiesner6825 Is Probability not a mandatory middle school topic in the west? It's something every child can learn intuitively with some guidance

[@wx7fm]

@@jongyon7192p probably is very hard. I think everyone agrees with that. It's very cool though if you specifically find it intuitive. That's not the case for most people

[@jongyon7192p]

@@wx7fm my classmates when i was a kid all said they preferred when classes were teaching probability over other math things

[@LeoTheDarkAngel]

The fact that a physicist did the math for Dream should tell you everything you need to know. The number of arguments I (mostly jokingly) had with physicists about how to do maths because they couldn't be bothered to do it correctly is _high_ 😂

[@jager8148]

He literally admitted to cheating.

[@LeoTheDarkAngel]

@@jager8148 Basically.

[@jordanbell4736]

For something like forensic statistics/probability, you would indeed want a statistician/mathematician. There are possible subtleties that their training is entirely focused on. A more serious issue is that they didn't want their name on it. If I were hired to write a report as devil's advocate, I'd either decline if there is nothing I could say in their defense or accept and write things that are true but selectively in the client's favor and make the conclusions qualified

[@VoltisArt]

@@LeoTheDarkAngel I think this is not a "basically," but an "actually.' Another comment marked for a year previous to yours said Dream admitted cheating months before that. (As in shortly after this video was released.) In regards to physicists, when an entire category of scientists like to begin sentences with "Assume..." they're going to ruffle math people's feathers, lol.

[@badlydrawnturtle8484]

A reminder to people who might still be defending Dream after he admitted it was modded... even if it was actually an accident at the time of the run, he not only lied about it for three months, but went so far as to pay a professional mathematician to write a bogus paper defending him. And for anybody who tries to take the "final stand" of these sorts of things that it's not a big deal because it was just a game or whatever... someone who cheats and lies rarely does it just once. He's not worthy of trust, and if you keep giving it to him going forward, you're duping yourself.

[@mesaplayer9636]

I want to know at what point he noticed he had a mod on, because if he didn't notice the whole time he was speed running then its likely he might not have noticed it until after he had already had the mathematician write the paper. That would explain why he deleted his video about the subject and didn't say anything about it till just recently where he admitted to his fault. Usually people that lie don't come out and admit the truth especially if there is a large audience already defending them. The fact is he did not have to admit the truth people were still watching his content, he admitted because he wanted to. Frequent liars don't do that.

[@badlydrawnturtle8484]

​@@mesaplayer9636 "because if he didn't notice the whole time he was speed running then its likely he might not have noticed it until after he had already had the mathematician write the paper." No, it really isn't likely. If he hadn't noticed by the time that paper was written, there's no reason to think he would suddenly notice going forward; it's not like he still has the settings he used and is sitting there, staring at them. No: If, and this is a big if, he genuinely made an initial mistake, he would have noticed, at the latest, when the formal accusation had been levelled. "The fact is he did not have to admit the truth people were still watching his content, he admitted because he wanted to. Frequent liars don't do that." That's utterly backwards. Only frequent liars think that admitting the truth is a matter of transactional value, rather than basic morality. As for a motivation for admitting it now: When the dust settled and everybody had spoken their piece, the consensus outside of his fanbase was that he was a cheater, and even if that doesn't effect the numbers immediately, he has to consider his reputation going forward. This was a final attempt to save face when he realized the lie wasn't working well enough.

[@nathanhernandez7173]

@@badlydrawnturtle8484 The speedrun moderators asked for his mod folder back when the controversy was still fresh and he gave excuses as to why he couldn’t give it to them. I’m sure he’s known for a good while now

[@tangyonions]

@@mesaplayer9636 If he didn't know he had a mod, then why would he get someone to write a bogus paper? And you can say that the mathematician made a mistake, but then why would he remain anonymous? Every single person who takes pride in their work will put their name all over it, so he obviously knew he had a mod

[@Ashuowl]

@@badlydrawnturtle8484 The main reason he knew it was due to the mods was because the coder told him about it way after. At least according to Dream's statements.

[@guardingdark2860]

When he was talking about craps tables and how unlikely the records are, I kinda forgot that this was about Dream and was just enjoying the math.

[@Johnwilliams-th9hq]

It was really inetresting how he was able to justify the math of something THAT lucky.

[@decentish8546]

I always enjoy math when someone else is doing it :D

[@Kawdek]

This is all of Matt’s content basically, so you’re in for a treat if you ever feel up for more mathematics content!

[@sinom_00]

Joke's on you Matt, I'm here for the maths AND the minecraft

[@zidanez21]

Exactly

[@Xnoob545]

same

[@root42]

I am here for the Matts and the maths! And a bit minecraft...

[@fillthedao]

haha! you got him! ^^

[@Humulator]

same. i watch both a lot of minecrafters and this channel

[@NoriMori1992]

Making this video might be the single smartest thing Matt's ever done on his KZbin channel. It's only a year and a half old but it's his second-most popular video, second only to his Dr. Nim video which is 5 years older. And I'm sure it attracted a ton of newcomers from the Minecraft community.

[@tomboomeronacrv]

It’s also perfectly placed in the timeline of events that happened, adding in a purely mathematical perspective to the equation. It served its purpose of helping explain the numbers further, and thats where it shall stay in history

[@Noah-kd6lq]

This was very well done. I never realized he was more likely to get NO ender pearls than that many.

[@ScubaShark--8964]

*_They calculate every speedruns of Dream including those aren't top ones, (I didn't mean Dream DID IT) but Dream can actually equal it out with the higher drop rate on the top speedruns and low drop rate on fun speedruns to equal the percentage out._*_ (Sorry if I have any grammatical mistakes here, since I'm not a native English speaker.)_

[@Joe-nh8eq]

I think this needs to be said because good sir you have done it. This is quite literally the perfect youtube video. It's trick shots X video games X Celebrity streamer X drama X cheating X educational content X comedy. I have no idea what the probability of this exact video coming together or how much work had to go into this, but if aliens' came down and wanted to understand what youtube was, this is the video I would show them.

[@garethbaus5471]

It needs cats.

[@HughMahnnn]

Cats and someone failing painfully.... and a dramatic hamster.....and a talking dog.... and a Charlie bit my finger. Other than that, it is pretty damn perfect, statistically speaking.

[@EddieBurke]

@@HughMahnnn >Charlie but my finger Found the boomer

[@saintburnsy2468]

@@EddieBurke Eddie.

[@Joe1729]

the only things its missing is cats and food porn

[@andykeskimaki5409]

So what your saying is Dream should "probably" get a refund on that argument paper he had made

[@adriking4272]

Dream probably changed some of the Numbers in his paper, thats why the publisher off Dreams paper is anonymous.

[@kaitudhope9122]

lolol i see what u did there

[@peterkirk8510]

I mean, it’s a little difficult to create a case in such a short time when there’s none to be had

[@Black-Dawg-Jesus]

He should, yes. "Anonymous expert" already says a lot about the quality of the paper. Normally you know who releases a scientific paper because they're released under a name. With being anonymous, everyone can claim that they are an "expert" and you have no proof of who actually did this research. This paper is on the same level as a random YT comment claiming to be an expert.

[@greenapplemonkey]

Honestly, for an actual researcher to not want to stick their name on a paper but instead publish anonymous is either a) incredibly unlikely, b) they don´t believe that the contents of the paper are correct or c) somebody just pulled it out of their behind. Honestly, for every decent scientific paper (not just mathematics), there should be a person you can contact if you have any further questions on it. If nobody is willing to be that contact, it´s very propable that nobody did any proper scientific work on it.

[@mimumi3723]

Just the fact that Dream has paid someone to protect him instead of accepting the low chance raises questions

[@Princex69]

This video randomly showed up in my feed can you explain what all this drama is/was?

[@WJS774]

@@Princex69 Didn't you watch the video? It explains exactly what the drama was.

[@Princex69]

@@WJS774 I didn't understand that's why I'm asking 😔

[@jheris]

​@Princex69 Disclaimer: Not a MC player, I've just watched a few videos. Dream submitted a speedrun, speedrun was considered pretty lucky due to the drops needed to finish a run (Blaze Rods & Ender Pearls). People then started wandering if there was any foul play, countless MC players calculate the odds, astronomically high luck was needed for the speedrun. Dream hires a "mathematician" to disprove the accusations, he was asked to show his MC folders to show that he had no add-ons or mods installed, he was not able to show them due to some circumstances. Time passes and he "admits" that the run he submitted actually had mods installed to increase drop chances (Blaze Rods and Ender Pearls) but he did not know they were active. Plausible alibi, since he has said that he uses those for his other videos (Manhunt?). His run was then removed from the leaderboard. Apologies for any mistakes.

[@jonathandavies1716]

Having warmed up with elections, now Matt is dealing with the real important issues.

[@gunar.kroeger]

hahahahha

[@woowooNeedsFaith]

LOL.

[@MrCrashDavi]

+

[@johanrojassoderman5590]

Reminds me of a 3blue1brown quote: "It is a possibility, but the probability is zero". Edit: regarding a specific number in a continuous space. From a video on multidemensional darts if I recall correctly.

[@anch95]

The probability of all the molecules in my room arranging in the way they should is practically 0, but it still happened the way it did, because of the inf no. of outcomes with a 1/inf probability each, one must come to exist, and others not. So, compensation for unlikeliness comes from how we select the way outcomes occur to be reasonable.

[@RebelKeithy]

@@anch95 The probability is practically 0, but mathematically non-zero just extremely small. Picking any particular number between 0 and 1 is mathematically 0.

[@prototypeinheritance515]

that's exactly what matt meant by "throwing a dart out of an airplane"

[@RealTwistedTwin]

@@RebelKeithy it's only non-zero if you assume space and time are discretized though

[@WooperSlim]

"You can have events that are possible, it's just probability zero." Nice quote. kzbin.info/www/bejne/bJDchmybf5WBrqM

[@timseguine2]

The ten billion human second century is such a great and intuitive mental aid.

[@AnasHart]

Rename it to the Mattsecond for easier use?

[@danielyuan9862]

@@AnasHart It's just a constant number, so we can name it Parker's number or the Parker number.

[@ehsan_kia]

Absolutely. At first I was a little confused, but his strategy is so clever. Instead of trying to get rid of biases on Dream's number and bring it down by using complicated analysis and modeling, he approaches the problem the other way around, instead he assumes what if everyone in the world was trying to hit a number that high, could *anyone* do it. And since no one can, then neither could have Dream. It's almost a proof by contradiction. So much simpler than whatever the long PDFs were trying to do, you can explain this in basically a minute to anyone.

[@timseguine2]

@@ehsan_kia Retrospectively it makes sense, and seems like an easy insight to have. It reminds me of the approach of cryptographic security in some cases. One common method there is to assume there is a computer the mass of the earth that can process information at Bremermann's limit and then to calculate how long it would take to crack the security. If a computer the size of the earth processing as fast as is possible based on the laws of physics can't crack the security, then neither can you.

[@platinummyrr]

it's very similar to the kilo-google from 2blue1brown's video about SHA256 as well :)