have you seen the cnc kitchen video about printing clear prints with petg? those settings also made the print a lot stronger, would be cool to see if that would increase the pressure it could hold
@Dartheomus9 ай бұрын
Did I miss it, or did you not include video of the actual testing/failures?
@mattw79499 ай бұрын
I can't emphasize enough the difference between pressurized water and air/gas in relation to the likelihood of losing eyes, fingers and generally eating shrapnel. Consider it like this... pull on a 50' chain with all your might and let it go... not a dramatic show. Now pull on a 50' spring with the same force and let go... and observe the drama.
@shiphorns4 ай бұрын
Indeed. For this kind of hydrostatic testing, the normal setup is to also have the part itself under water, rather than in an air enclosure. This is particularly important with metal parts and with higher pressures, because even though water is not very compressible, at thousands of PSI it still stores enough energy to create very dangeous shrapnel. Having the test piece under water quickly slows down the shrapnel to safe speeds within just a few cm.
@commandingsteel18 күн бұрын
no one ever got anywhere in life by being safe...
@ngDetecter7 күн бұрын
@@commandingsteel OK boomer
@commandingsteel7 күн бұрын
@@ngDetecter i don't think you have the slightest understanding of how that should be used...lol
@mrnlce79399 ай бұрын
Would love to see more on this concept to see how far you can take it. I think tpu might do better or it would blow up like a balloon. Also don't forget to film the tests. We all like energetic failures. Great video. Keep up the good work.
@andrewadams96869 ай бұрын
I wonder what TPU would do?
@sweetgumnyc779422 күн бұрын
i have been fleshing out an idea for a 3d printed rocket propelled grenade launcher that uses propane and oxygen to initiate the rockets ejection from the barrel in order to increase the distance from the shooter before the rocket fires, to prevent burns. sort of how the javelin missile works. Based on your experiments do you think that its feasible to try printing small pressure vessels that can hold a small amount of compressed propane and oxygen? i imagine it wouldn't need on ton of pressure to just hold enough gas for a couple firings or would steel canisters be the only way to go? being able to 3d print these small vessels would certainly allow the design to be much nicer and easier to fabricate.
@diamonddogie9 ай бұрын
you can also coat insides/outsides of 3d printed tanks to strengthen and leakproof them
@kevinsmart21659 ай бұрын
Interesting and well made video! Not sure I can currently use these findings, but certainly good to know. Especially that compressing water (or trying to) is safer than compressing air. 👍🏼
@CaptainSeamus9 ай бұрын
You talking about use of water instead of air reminds me: NEVER use White pvc for air lines. Seeing the printed parts standing up to this is interesting.
@robertgaudet7407Ай бұрын
I’ve seen whole shops with white pvc air lines 0.0
@sweetgumnyc779422 күн бұрын
wouldnt TPU be the best option since you would in theory expand with pressure rather than cracking?
@gnks76039 ай бұрын
IMPORTANT!! ‼️‼️!!! SET WALLS INSIDE->OUTSIDE most presets are outside to inside Inside to outside helps minimizing possible gaps
@davidwensboposaric54989 ай бұрын
Regarding leakage: What about inserting a condom before filling with water (and making sure the threads are sanded and lubricated)? Initially the air would fizzle out through the pores, and then the wall would serve as armor. I've probably forgot something essential... or not.
@autonoob9 ай бұрын
Came here to suggest this :)
@aware2action9 ай бұрын
The manner in which the part was printed, will also decide how strong the parts are. It is not about number of walls alone, it is also about how high a temperature was used, amount of overlap between walls(overextrusion could be beneficial-which was covered👍) and even the nozzle size, should have to be atleast 0.8mm or more (not sure if all sl8cers allow for higher layer height). Also a staggered thinwalled honeycomb grid structure holding on to inner walls will do much better. Apart from that, there are plastics, that could be annealed further for increased strength. Just some suggestions...
@glowpon39 ай бұрын
I've been thinking of doing something similar, but for vacuum instead of pressure. Also, you can get better seals from PVB as long as you don't soften the infill.
@LTLC9 ай бұрын
Next time try to randomize the seams instead of using aligned. That way you can eliminate a failure point and increase it's overall strength.
@DRCK-sp2gt9 ай бұрын
id be interested to see if you thickened the walls slightly, made them into spheres and annealed the parts.
@Tsnafu9 ай бұрын
Good job on filling your vessels with water - I used to make stainless steel boilers and pipelines, and that's how we used to test them to 45bar. You really don't want a large pressure vessel letting go with that kind of pressure behind it. BTW, how's the joule thief getting on? Mine has just passed the 3 year mark
@mentallychallengedpokemon579 ай бұрын
Those are great results. Have you heard about Filament Winding? In short, the process of winding for example carbon, or glassfibres, drenched in resin, around a vessel, to increase its capability to resist preasure and keep it comparitively light?
@ShreddinSleds3 ай бұрын
Have you messed with different shapes? Maybe try just a sphere?
@nachgebaut41765 ай бұрын
Another way to make them air/waterthight is by anneling or remelting. Theres many ways to do it, the most effective one is salt anneling. By burying your part in salt you basically make a mold of the part, inwhich it gets re melted. With the melting tempreture of the part shieved, it starts catalyzing creating a solid part. Not only should it be air/water thight, it may be even stronger;)
@roboman24449 ай бұрын
I wonder if filling/encasing it in salt and "re-melting" would help with leak strength. Also carbon fiber nylon may work even better.
@OffGridOverLander9 ай бұрын
Thank you for this info! I was looking for similar information but not for a tank. I posted a question on Reddit but never got a response. I have a 300psi pump for water/methanol and I need a manifold for 2 hydraulic circuits with 12 outputs, all based around the Cummins 6CTA8.3 intake bolt pattern. Now that I know that PLA/PETG can handle those pressures I feel better about testing further. Actually I would’ve been working on it already but my printer has been broken for 3 weeks, I’m still waiting on a replacement ribbon cable for the controller.
@Xailow9 ай бұрын
Composite overwrap. Could go lower wall thickness and way more strength.
@davidwensboposaric54989 ай бұрын
If I'm correct in my calculation (and the leakage problem could be solved), you could potentially 3D-print a small submarine with a diving capability in the range of 300m below the surface?
@smellycat2499 ай бұрын
This is amazing. What pressures can you get with a fiberglass and resin wrap???
@patrickradcliffe38379 ай бұрын
You should try an acetone vapor treatment to seal up the leaks in vessel.
@maneki360nekodude59 ай бұрын
Put balloon inside mabe?
@erroneousbosch9 ай бұрын
3d prints are going to be inherently leaky off the bed. Some kind of sealing layer may help, maybe some thin epoxy run around the inside and left to cure. Otherwise, you could salt bake them to get them air tight.
@stevendunn2649 ай бұрын
I think 3D printing a custom shape is a great idea. What if that shape after printing was wrapped in a carbon fiber / glass coat after… I bet it would hold.
@secretagb9 ай бұрын
Wow that's surprising! I really was also thinking less than 200psi, way less.
@JustinBuildsThings9 ай бұрын
how was your initial thought not....3d printed super soaker?
@1supertec9 ай бұрын
Yes it would have been cool to see the video of the failures but still a very surprising result considering most commercial pressure vessels are rated at about 10-12 bar or 140-170 psi so that's way below the pressure you got to 👍
@EmotionalTree9 ай бұрын
They look to have failed at the z seam. If you can solve the leaking problem try it again with better z seam settings.
@AKAtheA9 ай бұрын
so, do you feel brave enough to crisscross wrap them in glass or carbon fiber rowing and epoxy (like composite pressure vessels) and test? :D
@derekmitchell2099 ай бұрын
Very interesting stuff, but you have to give us some burst footage.
@rynait9 ай бұрын
not expert in fluid dynamics, but know a few things. as other comments stated; design need to be tested based on three points of operational consideration. first point is the max rapid fail (that is done with reserve pressure, fill design up so fast, allowing the vibration of the pressure to reveal shatter or weak points. thus revealing engineering exploits). second point is standard fill to max (usually start the test method in order to find design's capability based on standard pressure making equipment). third is "safety / operational" point. most design 1/3 or 1/4 of the maximum capability. I am told, thus not expert in such dynamics. If device "stays together" after breaking or shattering is "best" safe design. Shatters into small pieces but not staying together is considered dangerous design. then the reduced specification aka safe/operational specification is based on handling "surprises" such as extreme weather example fast freezes, heat waves. same with fire and "external" crash crush (ex roof falling down on it). Those do change the device capability. the disappointment here, you did not specify water temperature in your test. cold water, luke warm and boiling water all behaves differently in a designed vessel. I understand, you dont want to "experiment" like a engineer would, I respect that. Thank you for providing some discovery detail regarding the pressure vessel you experimented on. Would you release your "model" for someone else to test if other want to dare?
@gman95439 ай бұрын
You should look a annealing your prints to see if that makes a difference (I would think it would if you're seeing failures along layer lines.)
@rishabhgupta96199 ай бұрын
Hey It's quite interesting work, I might use this to make a bb shooter 🤣. I have a small design suggestion, you can try adding ribs inside the tank to hold the pressure better and Maybe put epoxy resin to make it water tight ( would love to see the results in the next video), on more thing me be you make a bounding box around tank and pour resin in between the cavity to make it even more air tight and withstand the pressure better.
@rishabhgupta96199 ай бұрын
Let me know if I can help with design of this new tank. More than happy to help
@mecharc9 ай бұрын
Idk cause ima newb, but would electroplating help tank integrity?
@adamcarson15169 ай бұрын
Maybe pour some paint inside to seal the pin holes maybe ?
@giuseppebonatici71699 ай бұрын
I was thinking about something similar: resin, but you also pump a bit of air pressure to force it to get into the pores. but the results depends on the geometry of the pore: if it acts a as perpedicular plug (unlikely), you just made a bullet.
@SeanTaffert9 ай бұрын
How did you set your seams in the slice settings?
@mitchellhowell93809 ай бұрын
I also wondered this. I would figure that random alignment with staggered seams would be best.
@thechannel8x9 ай бұрын
you are so awkward that I had to upvote your video. Love it ❤❤ Please make more!
@rewop129 ай бұрын
I didn't think he was awkward at all
@mattw79499 ай бұрын
Nerds secretly run the world. At least that's what I tell myself.
@SilentShiba9 ай бұрын
BROOOOO don't do my mans dirty like that
@kevinpezzi67779 ай бұрын
Good job! Surprising strength of the tank.
@abluh129 ай бұрын
what if this was done in vase mode with no seams
@SilentShiba9 ай бұрын
~~I get 3D printed water-tight parts by over extruding the PETG~~. Although on this new printer I have, I havent had to use that trick as long as nothing weird happens in the print, the walls are solid. E: Beat me to it, at the end of the video.
@InsanityOnWheels9 ай бұрын
This is great information. I've been considering a 3D printed pneumatic nerf gun but I was questioning the pressure holding capabilities of FDM.
@jtjames799 ай бұрын
Carbon fiber's gotten really cheap these days. It's even competitive with fiberglass. Just wrap your pressure vessel.
@nachgebaut41765 ай бұрын
@@jtjames79 Or just use a crabon fiber tube as the air tank, they do that with air guns.
@nachgebaut41765 ай бұрын
You can use anneling, salt anneling will give the best results. By burying your part in fine salt powder you basically make a mold of the part, in which it gets remelted. With the melting tempreture of the part shieved, it starts catalyzing creating a solid part. Not only should it be air/water thight, it may be even stronger;)
@ZoomtronicBlogspot9 ай бұрын
Lack of metric units just made me watch video just half way
@robottwrecks52369 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing your experiment!
@Eilaithen19 ай бұрын
Flex seal the inside lol
@JohnByrneLSM9 ай бұрын
DIY Super Soaker? :)
@joedoe36889 ай бұрын
you really put those boring graphics into the focus of this video instead of bursting pressure tanks? are you kidding me, don't you know the Hydraulic Press Channel? Those with almost 9 million subscribers. You could have easily getting trending with a video showing bursting 3d-prints.