How NEW Scientific Discoveries Are Pointing To GOD | Epic FULL Podcast With @DrStephenMeyer

[@brando3342]

Fun fact: Several years ago I read that Wikipedia description on Dr. Meyer’s page. Subsequently I made an account specifically so I could change that false attribution of “pseudoscience” to just regular old “science”. After I did this, a few minutes later, I reloaded the page; looking at it again, I noticed it had been reverted back to “pseudoscience” again. So, I attempted to change it again, only for the same thing to happen. I tried 3 more times without success. Finally, I ended up speaking to a moderator of the site, and to my surprise (at the time), this person was a STAUNCH new-atheist. I mean, to an insane degree. He was Jesus Mythicist levels of cringe new-atheism. This being the case, I could see no amount of reason would have done any good, so I let it go. Moral of the story? Wikipedia is completely untrustworthy to present any theistic argument in a fair manner, or any theist in a fair manner, and they will not stand for anyone who dares change that. Don’t take Wikipedia seriously, it’s garbage 👍

[@kos-mos1127]

Theistic arguments are presented in a fair manner as a dogmatic belief system which it is.

[@brando3342]

@@kos-mos1127 Materialist arguments are presented in a fair manner as a dogmatic belief system which it is. See, I can do that too.

[@ob2249]

@brand03342 but what he said is IargeIy accurate what y0u said is n0t what is a materiaIist argument ? there is n0 wiki page f0r materiaIsm

[@jamescurtis1226]

@@kos-mos1127 I can help...puts on SUPERMAN cape... What is the brain? Well according to atheist/evolutionist, it is the end result of a mindless unguided process...And atheist/evolutionist base their ENTIRE theory on their "Thought" How strange is that? Their "Theory" declares that their brain is a "happy accident" and yet they can say that their thoughts are factual? Dogmatic belief based on an accident...interesting

[@BeachandHills-hb2pq]

@@ob2249 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Materialism ?

[@carldali8530]

Dr. Meyer has been such a blessing to me for many years. I'm so glad he's getting more mainstream exposure. God is using him to help gather his people. Amen!

[@HarryNicNicholas]

yes you must love the BS that confirms what you ought to know is BS. just look up the dover trials, creationism should be buried it's been dead for so long, it's just a cheap excuse to get god into schools for another hour, meyer knows this. ID, creationism and irreducible complexity should be an embarrassment to religion it's so badly thought out. it's DESPERATION on religions part keeps it going. and you can't prove god exists anyway, all meyer could do (if he were an actual scientist) is show that NATURE did it, your god hides so i can have free will, there CANNOT be evidence of god anywhere can there you banana.

[@Doriesep6622]

LOL.

[@TboneWTF]

This is absurd. No true scientist would ever make such a ridiculous claim unless they were prejudice. Scientist make answers based on study and tests. When they discover an answer they allow other knowledgeable scientists to study it and input their thoughts. Evolution was studied extensively for many years by learned and intelligent people. It didn't just appear because one person said it was true. I suspect this "Doctor" Stephen is a paid actor or biased towards Christianity.

[@zzycatch]

​@@Doriesep6622I can't imagine being so alone, so unloved, so bitter, and empty as to trawl KZbin videos you disagree with, just to ridicule people who find value where you cannot. Get some sun, make some friends, call your parents, learn a craft. Your wasting your life looking to feel good by placing yourself above others, but you still have nowhere better to be than with people you hate. Just sad.

[@ramonortiz7462]

Outer space i.e. an INFINITE VACUUM UNIVERSE cannot exist along side a pressurized system without the pressurized system filling the vacuum or VACANT space. Therefore outer "space" is fake!! It is part of the great DECEPTION

[@bozmerz4358]

Yes after all is said and done concerning the debates of our beginnings.... I too ultimately desire for all humans to not only accept there is a designer/creator... But to also have a faith relationship with him. After all it is the most important step we must take... to profit our destination of a loving peaceful eternity with God. When we leave these bodies so beautifully made, we will understand EVERYTHING. And I wish for no one to understand, that it's too late.

[@amberpennuto7986]

Thank you, Dr. Meyer, for applying your brilliance to the acknowledgement of God ❤

[@histreeonics7770]

He makes so many errors of logic and fact that "brilliance" is an inappropriate adjective. Read the reviews of his books, how easy it is to point out where he gets the actual science very wrong. All he ever disproves is his own erroneous ideas of what he claims actual scientists state. That he continues to put forth soundly refuted arguments marks him as dishonest.

[@garyfonseca3035]

@histreeonics7770 can you point us to which reviews of his book you have in mind?

[@histreeonics7770]

@@garyfonseca3035 Find any of them. None of his books have valid science in them to any significant degree. The wikipedia article on "Signature in the Cell" has links to such. The Panda's Thumb website and talkorigins as well usually have articles on psuedoscience and plain old BS such as Meyer's sells (and he does sell it, writing such lies is his vocation). -- Edit: there are now quite a few broken links and down servers. ID is not a well formed hypothesis much less a theory, it makes no testable predictions that are distinct from non-supernatural hypotheses. It does not explain anything other than how credulous people can be. It denies being "god of the gaps", but until such time as its promoters provide some data on its mechanisms it has not met the minimal standard for a valid hypothesis and indeed is "nameless god of the gaps".

[@ageeibc6029]

It's good Dr works hand in hand with the Creator. He gives life & wisdom & He takes them away 2. Octogenarian.

[@tylerreed3754]

Do you have an example? All you currently have is words with 0 evidence to back them up.@@histreeonics7770

[@joshua2707]

Yes, the full interview with Stephen Meyer! Excellent, I was really hoping this would come up soon. There's so much I wanted to hear from Meyer for a long time now since I've read his books (I hope he would publish another one in the near future with any updates on the ID front). I'm super envious that you had the opportunity to have such a prolonged and thorough discussion with him!

[@Daily_Dose_Of_Wisdom]

Thanks Joshua! I hope you enjoy! Let me k ow any additional questions you have that we didn’t get into here and I’ll hope to include them in an another conversation in the future.

[@michaelbrickley2443]

It’s good to see Dr. Stephen Meyer in a context more attuned to regular peoples, i.e.=laymen, way of thinking. Sad the way scientists who are God skeptics make him out to be “fringe” thinker when he is more in line with theists of which there is a large number in the science field as revealed during the ecology roundtable at Lanier Theological. Shalom

[@derhafi]

@@michaelbrickley2443 It is the fact that he continously lies about scientific research, deliberately misleads his scientifically illiterate audience and that he has formulated and signed the Wedge Document for his employer, the ill-named Discovery Institute where they do no research at all, none, and of which one of its founders Howard F. Ahmanson, Jr. openly wants to replace democracy with a fundamentalist theocracy....That's why acual scientists use the term "fringe" in regards to him. They could justifiably use much stronger terms than that.

[@HarryNicNicholas]

just look up the dover trials, creationism should be buried it's been dead for so long, it's just a cheap excuse to get god into schools for another hour, meyer knows this. ID, creationism and irreducible complexity should be an embarrassment to religion it's so badly thought out. it's DESPERATION on religions part keeps it going. and you can't prove god exists anyway, all meyer could do (if he were an actual scientist) is show that NATURE did it, your god hides so i can have free will, there CANNOT be evidence of god anywhere can there you banana.

[@HarryNicNicholas]

@@Daily_Dose_Of_Wisdom here's a question, how can i have free will if god has written morality on my heart? i want to steal and lie but i can't, my free will is compromised.

[@CoreySr301]

All glory and praise to God! Thank you again, brother. Your videos are incredibly inspiring. I go out in my community to share the gospel's good news and testify of the love God continues to show me. Your channel has played a massive part in pushing me to tell EVERYONE about the glory of God.

[@Daily_Dose_Of_Wisdom]

That's so awesome to hear! Keep up the good work brother! And be blessed!

[@alisherxolmirzayev4203]

​@@Daily_Dose_Of_Wisdom Hello man, could you look for scientific miracles in the Quran?

[@CelticSpiritsCoven]

@@alisherxolmirzayev4203 There are no scientific miracles in the Quran. The Quran says that the sperm of a woman comes from her breastbone. Everybody knows this is flatly wrong. The Quran is wrong, therefore it is not from God.

[@corning1]

Oh shut up. I’m a Christian I’m so tired of this take.

[@corning1]

Grow up.

[@Yellowstonetim]

Thank you both for a wonderful conversation that was such a pleasure to listen too and provided a number of clear points I can use in my discussions. And thank you Dr Stephen C Meyer for your work and focus on intelligent design while leaving the who question to others.

[@michaelarojas]

It's amazing that we get to listen to these intellectual conversations for free!

[@jentinanaude2659]

I know right!!

[@saintmalaclypse3217]

I agree…it was free. But it was almost painful listening to the desperate attempts to fit god into science.

[@jerrylong6238]

Horses**t is always free. Just go out in any pasture and take a bucket with you.

[@jerrylong6238]

@@saintmalaclypse3217 Praise Zeus and amen.

[@conspiracy1914]

@@jerrylong6238 do you hate the idea of a creator that much? its kind of comical to see people hurt over someone claiming a talk was intellectual

[@hapennysparrow]

I loved every moment of this interview. God is seen in everything He has made. It all points to Him. The only response is to lift up our hands in worship and awe. What a great and mighty Creator who loves His creation, so much so that He came down to the world we broke in order to redeem us and reorient us back to Him. I am not positing the idea that Jesus is the Father, but that the Father sent Himself in His Son, by the agency of the Holy Spirit, in order to give us that visual, tangible, knowable expression of who He is. Jesus is the express image if the Father. When we see Him, we see the essence of the Father. The agency of the Holy Spirit draws us to the Son, and the Son, to the Father. The three are one. So beautiful. I love nature because He speaks deep truths through His creation if our eyes and ears are opened. What an amazing God.

[@jaflenbond7854]

The WORTH, VALUE, and IMPORTANCE of the CREATOR and JESUS CHRIST to HUMAN BEINGS The Creator KNOWS that all persons on earth who honor and obey his Christ as their Heavenly Master and King and believe his teachings about the "Kingdom of God" and "Resurrection of the Dead" are his Worshippers and Followers of Jesus Christ on earth who can be trusted with anything and are worthy and deserving of his favor and reward of ETERNAL LIFE and EXISTENCE without sufferings, pains, griefs, sickness and death on a safe and peaceful earth without arrogant, cruel, and merciless persons, without liars, traitors, deceivers, slanderers, perverts, and murderers. The CREATOR is WORTHLESS and USELESS to ATHEISTS and EVOLUTIONISTS Jesus Christ KNOWS that all Atheists and Evolutionists are NOT and will never ever be Worshippers of the Creator simply because the Creator is offensive and unacceptable to them.... worthless, useless, and undeserving to be honored and respected as the True and Sovereign God JESUS CHRIST is WORTHLESS and USELESS to CHRISTIANS and ALL RELIGIONS The Creator KNOWS that Jehovah's Witnesses, SDAs, Mormons, Catholics, Baptists, Methodists, Born Again Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, and fanatics of all kinds of Religions in the world are NOT and will never ever be Followers of Jesus Christ simply because Jesus Christ is offensive and unacceptable to them... worthless, useless, and undeserving to be honored and respected as his Chosen King and Ruler of the heavens and the earth. The WORTH, VALUE, and IMPORTANCE of the teachings of JESUS CHRIST about the "KINGDOM of GOD" and "RESURRECTION of the DEAD" Worshippers of the Creator and Followers of Jesus Christ KNOW and are fully aware that all human beings have no immortal souls and will just become worthless and useless dusts on earth after their deaths just like the animals but all worshippers of the loving, kind, and merciful Creator who died recently and thousands of years ago like Abel, Noah, Abraham, Sarah, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, Job, Naomi, Ruth, King David, Jesus Christ's disciples and followers, and many others will not remain as worthless and useless dusts on earth forever, instead, in the Creator's right and proper time, the loving, kind, and merciful Jesus Christ will freely, happily, and willingly RESURRECT them back to life so they can all happily and abundantly live and exist on earth forever as submissive and obedient subjects of the "KINGDOM of GOD" and fully enjoy his and the Creator's eternal love, kindness, goodness, compassions, generosities, favors, and blessings for eternity under his loving and kind rulership, guidance, and protection as the Creator's Chosen King and Ruler of the heavens and the earth.

[@alexanderrigby6917]

Beautiful conversation and praise be to the one true God, the Father who gives life to all living as the Scripture says. The question is..who is Jesus Christ's God? HalleluYah.

[@rikardotsamsiyu]

evidence of intelligent design: 0

[@joshpotter9261]

The heavens themselves declare God's glory - Ps. 19:1

[@justin10292000]

​@@rikardotsamsiyuEVERYTHING points to God. You are blind to Truth.

[@winstonsmiths2449]

I repeat: once DNA was found to contain information, science nailed the coffin shut on spontaneous creation of life and evolution.

[@Jwarrior123]

What? 🤔 What is it that science nailed the coffin on---- spontaneous creation or evolution? You mean to say it's one or the other right?

[@cabindatimmy2451]

DNA, doesn't have information in it. We have found a sequence of microscopic structures in DNA. This sequence can be found in diverse areas of matter in science and isn't necessary only in humans. We just choose to call it data because it's not the same for all humans.

[@Papa-dopoulos]

@@cabindatimmy2451This just boils down to semantics without really addressing the issue. Call it data, shmata, microscopic structures, or whatever. It meets the criteria for linguistic information. Specified complexity. Coding. More often than not, if you change one nucleotide in the sequence, things change. Specified complexity is the point - not whatever you want to call it.

[@doublev1454]

@@Papa-dopoulos BOOM 💥 You nailed it!!

[@cabindatimmy2451]

@@Papa-dopoulos Please, for the love of God tell me what or why the human DNA is specified for?

[@ScreamingatWhispers]

The fact that the multiverse is an accepted hypothesis and this isn't, reveals the current bias..men loved darkness rather than light because their deeds were evil. I am so blessed since God's light has shined into my life❤🎉❤

[@williamfuentes876]

This video has made me believe in God more than any religious video I’ve ever seen on KZbin. Thank you for it.

[@sunwheel01]

Stephen Myer is an unsung hero in my view (as is the interviewer) because he brings such calm, well-considered and powerful logic to question of origins.

[@derhafi]

He also is a demonstrable liar and fraud

[@ZeroG]

Problem is, he's lying. Science is not defined to be limited to materialistic explanations, as he claims it is. That's just bullshit.

[@jerrylong6238]

Unsung ain't the dam word for that dumba**. And hero is not even in the dam neighborhood. I would go with something more a-kin to braindead idiot myself. But of course that's my personal opinion.

[@rstevewarmorycom]

He's a complete shit brain with NO credentials in Evolutionary Bio. He would flunk any first year course!!

[@majm9309]

Yeah, but he didn't provide evidence indicating the cause of DNA was a god, right? Well that's god of the gaps. We don't know the cause of DNA (we don't have evidence), so the only rational position is 'we don't know'. But that's not what's being said here, they're basically saying 'we don't know, so that proves we do know [it was a god].'

[@giggitygoo675]

we live in a world where people are taught what to think, not how to think.

[@OrthodoxJourney359]

You stole the words right out of my mouth

[@sids5002]

Were you?

[@kos-mos1127]

Just like you were taught to believe in a near eastern myth.

[@giggitygoo675]

@@kos-mos1127 it's crazy that I made a neutral comment and it hurt your feelings lmao

[@iloveyoursnottyattitude6137]

And yet people here seem to believe every word said in the video like proned drones for some reason.

[@fancypants6382]

I came to faith through studying biology for my HSC(end of high school in Aus) no way could all that happen by accident. I never had that much ‘Faith’

[@corning1]

Could you explain in basic terms ?

[@jannenreuben7398]

Look up the fallacy of incredulity.

[@fxtimamubarak]

@@jannenreuben7398 he clearly said it his own reason of faith, he isn’t making an argument to someone or anything.

[@Angela-qs4cz]

I felt the same way when I studied cleavage during the embryology section. How could the division and differentiation of these cells be so perfectly timed? Who put those laws into place so that the same pattern is followed?

[@jannenreuben7398]

@@fxtimamubarak Believing something because you can't see how it could be different is not a smart move, especially for someone trained in the scientific method.

[@blackswan7568]

Brandon, your clips of Dr. Meyer's arguments (particularly the one on how math leads to God) are some of my favorite videos of yours. Thanks a bunch for this interview!

[@evanbrooks8737]

Great video. I appreciate what you're doing here. Praise Jesus!

[@Daily_Dose_Of_Wisdom]

Thanks! Praise Jesus!

[@gabrieledupres]

Donald Duck bless you♥

[@mcfarvo]

Creation itself testifies to the intelligent mind of a Creator

[@mcfarvo]

We know it is our God because He came to live among us, die for us, and rose from the grave!!!

[@ob2249]

@@mcfarvo if he r0se he didn`t die f0r any0ne

[@Lol_Pig]

Even from a coding perspective, all code is written by a programmer. I look at the universe and wonder how someone _can't_ see a Creator's hand at work.

[@grimreaper337]

​@ob2249 What part of , he rose FROM THE DEAD did you not understand ? You willfully ignore that ? He died .according to Eyewitness testimony

[@degaussingatmosphericcharg575]

You have to prove that something was created first, next, that intelligence was involved, after that who or what was the intelligence.... You cannot even prove that anything was created, rather than some things always existing.

[@klegs79]

Darwin's dead. God and His Son are fully and wonderfully alive. Dr. Meyer is awesome. Love everything he does. Such a great ambassador.

[@ob2249]

@kIegs and if he`s aIive he didn`t die, and if he didn`t die what did he sacrifice ? three days ?

[@jamescurtis1226]

@@ob2249 Have you died yet? Then how can you make the statement of what occurs after this Earthly Life ends? What evidence do you hold that states when life ends there is nothing more?

[@jamescurtis1226]

@ThoseCowardsDeleteMyReply I am not having a conversation with the guy on the cross. I am asking you a question and you are hiding from an answer. How can you make the statement of what occurs after this Earthly Life ends? What evidence do you hold that states when life ends there is nothing more? But because of your reply...another question...What evidence do you have that Jesus was NOT the Son of God? We put people in prison based on eyewitness testimony and in the case of Jesus we have 12 eyewitnesses.

[@jamescurtis1226]

@ThoseCowardsDeleteMyReply btw Jesus himself said...Before he was even arrested "No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father." John 10:18

[@jamescurtis1226]

@ThoseCowardsDeleteMyReply Ohh just one more question- Do you believe in evolution? Careful there is a worm on this hook...

[@johnbullard902]

Best Stephen Myer interview I’ve heard! Excellent

[@jennifermurphy5215]

You are a wonderful host! God bless you both.

[@Daily_Dose_Of_Wisdom]

Thanks so much!

[@aaronsearcy3536]

These are the arguments that led me to belief in God. It’s not blind faith when the evidence God has given of Himself and the best explanation for existence is verifiable in His creation and reliability of the word He has given to us. If your a truth seeker and are willing to be honest and rational, intellectually God and ultimately the God of the Bible is the most logical conclusion. “But men love darkness rather than light.”

[@kos-mos1127]

These arguments lead me to belief that God is imaginary. There was no creation and last I check God is silent. Saying that it is the God of the Bible is a massive jump not supported by any evidence. Let's say there was a creator of the universe it could be some kid in their mothers basement working on a science project.

[@muxion]

@@kos-mos1127 that's a valid conclusion, keep it and enjoy it, you don't need to argue against other's beliefs to validate yours do you? Nobody can take it away from you unless you let them, even God Almighty won't force Himself on you, but a lot of us want Him in charge, and He reveals Himself to people who want Him.

[@kos-mos1127]

@deadbytacticsYT There is no word of God. It is just men making idols. In the end you will see that God is not real. It will be in settling at first then you will accept it. At some point everyone realizes that God was a near eastern fairytale. That is the plain hard fact.

[@dustinmurphy82]

Exactly! It takes much more faith in my opinion to be an atheist.

[@saintmalaclypse3217]

Even if the evidence slightly suggested a god (which it doesn’t) how do you decide WHICH god?

[@andrewame9530]

Stephen Myer a humble man with a big brain soldering for the all mighty Creator.

[@ob1coyote]

I took a biology course for my Medical Coding and Billing classes. When we spent a chapter on DNA I could not imagine how anyone could learn that and still be an atheist. It's too complex, and intelligent to be an accident of time. During that class we were show a youtube video (I wish I could link it here) of the mechanics of transcription, the enzyme RNA polymerase uses DNA as a template to produce a pre-mRNA transcript. The pre-mRNA is processed to form a mature mRNA molecule that can be translated to build the protein molecule (polypeptide) encoded by the original gene. It's so amazing, and that's long before you start trying to explain the complexity of the rest of life like eyes, puppy dogs, circulatory systems, digestion, respiration, etc.

[@Radrook353]

Not surprising at all. That is the normal reaction to becoming familiar with DNA. The fanatically stubbornly irrational reaction is the atheistic one.

[@elguapo2831]

“Man thinks he can become God. But infinitely greater than that is the fact that God thought of becoming human.”

[@Daily_Dose_Of_Wisdom]

Love this 🙌

[@CatfishSlimeSoFine]

It genuinely saddens me that some people think they are Gods, it really puts into perspective how far we have fallen. The worldly need Gods love, forgiveness, and grace just as much as us however; emulate Christ and that’s the one thing they cannot deny, he lives through us. Let him shine.

[@alisherxolmirzayev4203]

​@@CatfishSlimeSoFine Could you search for Bart Ehrman, he is a great scholar on this topic.

[@perserverance333]

Well, only one scenario is possible.

[@kos-mos1127]

Man can become God. The term God is a title not a name and certainly not being.

[@brob368]

Fantastic channel. Keep it up brother. Praise to God.

[@Daily_Dose_Of_Wisdom]

Thank you! Yes, all Glory to God!

[@janetgarcia3273]

I believe we were created. I believe the Bible is God's Word. I cannot keep up with Dr. Meyers but I really appreciate and respect him.

[@gabrieledupres]

stupid

[@Pancakegr8]

How do you worship your god who created Satan? How do you worship a guy who punished Adam & Eve for sinning when they didn’t know what good and evil was before they sinned? How are you buying all this BS?

[@davidarbogast37]

Yeah well too bad your beliefs do not dictate reality just like any other theist.

[@bennyredpilled5455]

@@davidarbogast37 Very insightful

[@mefobills279]

The Bible was morphed and changed. The first Bible is the Marcione, read that and notice how it differs from today. Before Marcione there was the Arian controversy. Constantine settled that by giving the lands of the pagan church to the newly formed Roman Catholic.

[@lwiimbokasweshi]

Excellent interview. I learn so much from Stephen Meyer. His combination of philosophy and science is something to behold. Thanks for bringing him on.

[@Daily_Dose_Of_Wisdom]

You're so welcome! It was a great honor to be able to do so!

[@semosancus5506]

Awesome thanks for doing this interview. Can't wait to read some of his books.

[@BlakeSmith-eg3yq]

Love listening to intellectuals with tons of vocabulary talk. Dr. Meyer inspires me.

[@derhafi]

Dr. Meyer is a professional liar working for a right wing christian propaganda mill....where no research at all is done, none. They employ several demonstrable liars with a degree and no scientific integrity to misrepresent scientific research. Not to mention that one of its founders Howard F. Ahmanson, Jr. openly wants to replace democracy with a fundamentalist theocracy.

[@olav8490]

i live stephen meyer, he is very thorough with his explanation..you could sit down with him and he could go on for a day with just one question.. very informative

[@brianpetersen1179]

Doctor Meyer is a brilliant mind we are blessed to have him in our generation

[@SeanFabien]

Fantastic! Thank you Dr Meyer for your intellect and humility on a complex issue. Inspiring. All makes sense in a confused world.

[@histreeonics7770]

Somebody whose claims of knowing vastly more science than can ever be known is hardly humble. His claims of bits of biology being too unlikely to have occurred without sentient intervention presume a knowledge of biology greater than that of his God. Such probability estimates require that you either have many universes to compare, tallying up which have life and which do not, or that you have a proven technique for in this case the origin of life from which you can show how often that technique will result in life. It actually takes more than that, you have to show that you are aware of all possible techniques for forming life and that in itself appears to be impossible, you cannot know that there is nothing that you don't know. As such the man is flat out lying every time he quotes a probability number. He is not humble and his intellect is shallow. He makes his living as an entertainer of the gullible.

[@fish7678]

This discussion is sheds light to so many topics I found confusing. Thank you!

[@carolspencer6915]

Good afternoon to you both Exactly all of this. Super grateful. Thankyou for your work. 💜

[@christabor7636]

Love how the tension in Doc's face slowly faded away throughout the interview, you can tell he thoroughly enjoyed the interaction. God bless you both, and anyone coming here seeking answers.

[@Crosses3]

I was happy to hear about Alan Sandage. He was my father’s college roommate at Miami University. My dad spoke of him and his parents fondly.

[@callumclarke1733]

Dr Myers God bless you, love your work pointing out intelligent design, and Pointing to the Existence of God. As a Christian it makes your faith in God Even Stronger.

[@jaflenbond7854]

ETERNAL LIFE and EXISTENCE for FOLLOWERS of JESUS CHRIST The Creator KNOWS that he is the True and Sovereign God and he knows too that his favor and reward for Followers of his Christ and believers of his teachings about the "Kingdom of God" and "Resurrection of the Dead" as written in Luke 4: 43 and John 11: 25, 26 is ETERNAL LIFE and EXISTENCE without sufferings, pains, griefs, sickness and death on a safe and peaceful earth without liars, traitors, deceivers, slanderers, perverts, and murderers as written in Revelation 21: 3, 4, 8. ATHEISTS and EVOLUTIONISTS BRING THEMSELVES DISHONOR and ETERNAL DEATHS Jesus Christ KNOWS that all Atheists and Evolutionists who are mocking and degrading the Creator as worthless, useless, and undeserving to be honored and respected as the True and Sovereign God in their deliberate opposition and defiance of what were written in Matthew 22: 37 and John 17: 3 are obviously the haters and mockers of the Creator on earth who don't value their own lives, dignities, and existence... not bothered at all and just don't care even if their willful and Satanic hatred, mockeries, opposition, and defiance of the Creator's Sovereignty, will, and instructions result in their own dishonor, disgrace, downfall and ETERNAL DEATHS, just worthless and useless dusts on earth forever. CHRISTIANS and ALL RELIGIONS BRING THEMSELVES DISHONOR and ETERNAL DEATHS The Creator KNOWS that Jehovah's Witnesses, SDAs, Mormons, Catholics, Baptists, Methodists, Born Again Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, and fanatics of all kinds of Religions in the world who are mocking and degrading Jesus Christ as worthless, useless, and undeserving to be honored and respected as the One he has given all authority, his Chosen King and Ruler of the heavens and the earth in their deliberate opposition and defiance of what's written in Matthew 28: 18 and Revelation 11: 15 are obviously the haters and mockers of Jesus Christ on earth who don't value their own lives, dignities, and existence... not bothered at all and just don't care even if their willful and Satanic hatred, mockeries, opposition, and defiance of Jesus Christ's authority and teachings result in their own dishonor, disgrace, downfall and ETERNAL DEATHS, just worthless and useless dusts on earth forever. WORSHIPPERS of the CREATOR and FOLLOWERS of JESUS CHRIST WILL LIVE and EXIST on EARTH FOREVER. The Creator KNOWS that all human beings have no immortal souls and will just become worthless and useless dusts on earth after their deaths just like the animals as written in Ecclesiastes 3: 19, 20 ; 9: 5, 6 but all his worshippers who died recently and thousands of years ago like Abel, Noah, Abraham, Sarah, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, Job, Naomi, Ruth, King David, Jesus Christ's disciples and followers, and many others will not remain as worthless and useless dusts on earth forever, instead, in the right and proper time and as written in John 11: 25, 26, he will let Jesus Christ RESURRECT them back to life so they can all happily and abundantly live and exist on earth forever as submissive and obedient subjects of the "KINGDOM of GOD" or His Kingdom and fully enjoy his and his Christ's eternal love, kindness, goodness, compassions, generosities, favors, and blessings for eternity under the loving and kind rulership, guidance, and protection of Jesus Christ as his Chosen King and Ruler of the heavens and the earth as written in Revelation 11: 15.

[@NobodyAtAll56]

Quite interesting that every hypothesis postulated to deny a supernatural explanation for the universe relies on a premise at least as improbable and untestable as the existence of God. What great leaps of imagination were required to devise multiverse theory!

[@nitsujism]

At a minimum the same leaps of imagination required to invent the Christian God. Except, we may be able to derive experiments to empirically test if there is a multiverse or not. The Christian God has so far been evasive.

[@NobodyAtAll56]

@@nitsujism whatever you say little bro. Glad to have you interacting on this channel. Jesus loves you whether you like it or not

[@CelticSpiritsCoven]

@@nitsujism Multiple universe theory is one of the most ridiculous things ever muttered. "Universe" means "Everything". If there were different universes, then they would all be part of the entire universe. Thus a paradox. Multiple universes are therefore logically impossible. So why did you bring it up when there is not a shred of evidence for it, and is actually impossible? Talk about a leap of the imagination! There is more evidence for God than you can even imagine. But you not liking the evidence and denying it doesn't mean there is no evidence. It just means that you hate God, don't want him to exist, and could not emotionally accept that you are just wrong. Atheism is a very dumb cult religion.

[@markh1011]

@@CelticSpiritsCoven _""Universe" means "Everything"_ Are you not aware that language evolves? _"There is more evidence for God than you can even imagine. "_ Oh really? Lets see it then. _"Atheism is a very dumb cult religion."_ ...and with that comment you lose all credibility.

[@jannenreuben7398]

The big difference is that scientists don't accept multiverses as fact unlike theists who assert that their God explanation is the correct one without any evidence beyond ancient scriptures or personal revelation.

[@patriciadbjones1]

Excellent interview. Very informative. Thank you both.

[@cottonclubstudio]

I could listen you guys talk for days man. Loved the Rogan podcast but wanted more from this guy and you gave it to us. Thank you

[@Daily_Dose_Of_Wisdom]

You bet! I had the same feeling after Rogan.

[@mommadeb49]

Signature in the Cell, one of SCMeyer's books is amazing. It is Huge, but Very Readable.

[@MartTLS]

@@mommadeb49 A lot of fiction is .

[@justin10292000]

​@@MartTLSatheism is silly, toddler-tantrumish nonsense.

[@MartTLS]

@@justin10292000 Prove it

[@psalm421]

Exciting! Thanks for sharing this with us!

[@Daily_Dose_Of_Wisdom]

You bet! 🙏

[@johannaquinones7473]

This was incredible. Such complex topics exposed so clearly to a non scientific person such as myself. Greatly appreciated

[@LogosInsula]

They literally said nothing important, he just mentioned aspects of theories that are unproved and the people who still haven't proved them. He doesn't prove god, he just rambles on. There cannot be more than one universe. If you think you are in another universe, you are really just somewhere else in this universe. Uni-verse = one-verse. There can be only one. This guy is a sleep inducing medication that is all

[@dottie3166]

​​@@LogosInsulaIt is now being called multiverse for more than one. Look up Gregg Braden he's a respected scientist he can explains all of this, he's very credible.

[@NA-nc5dg]

You could search scientific videos on the subject, rather than having someone force a false equivalence to make a shady unfounded point..

[@LogosInsula]

@@dottie3166 Ok so the one universe is defined as all of existence. Nothingness does not exist according the Kiri kins law of metaphysics. Therefore ALL of existence is infinite and has no border. Infinity is the Universe and the Universe is infinite, correct?

[@dottie3166]

@@LogosInsula I hear what you're saying and it does make sense but if you start getting into quantum physics etc. they explain things much better than I can. Bruce Lipton is a quantum physicist and they are discovering there's more than one universe and there's also parallel universes. Actually if you go back in history you'll see how science keeps changing as they learn more also a lot is just theories. They used to think that the earth was flat and that our solar system was all there was. Maybe we are all just part of some video game that some entity is playing (lol)

[@wa1gon]

This was a great interview!!! Congrats! I am a computer software engineer. I was working on a crypto project that used BIG NUMBERS. When I say big I mean numbers that can count the number of atoms in the Universe. After that, I was watching a show on DNA. Hold the fort, DNA is much too complex to have happened by random mutations and natural selection. Then later I started watching Dr Behee's talks and learned that the complexity of DNA was just the tip of the iceberg. I wasn't a practicing Christian at the time, but this was an eye-opener for me. Anyone who believes that evolution works are people who are really bad at math. For me to accept Christianity as my faith 3 things had to be true: 1. God had to create the Universe 2. God had to create life 3. The Gospel had to be true. The answers I got were: 1. We live in a finely-tuned Universe 2. Life is so complex that it could never have occurred by chance. 3. J. Warning Wallace makes a compelling case that the NT of the Bible is faithful to the word of Jesus!

[@chrispark2698]

The more scientific discoveries we make, the more it leads to the need for a designing intelligence behind it all. There is no "God of the Gaps" when it comes to the conclusion that God exists.

[@cabindatimmy2451]

Once again, you are claiming to have newly scientific evidence for the existence of god that has not been scientifically accepted or researched by the science community. If you claims are real or proven true, everyone from all science sectors like mathematicians, physicist, biologist would be declaring your discovery to the world because of it profound effect to everything we know. But instead you are making many problematic claims for the god of the bible.

[@nudsh]

What scientific evidence can you point to that "leads to the need for a designing intelligence behind it all". Please demonstrate that ALL OTHER explanations are not valid as well. With data.

[@chrispark2698]

@@cabindatimmy2451 Genuinely curious - what are the "many problematic claims for the god of the bible" that I am making? "you are claiming to have newly scientific evidence for the existence of god that has not been scientifically accepted or researched by the science community" I don't think you understand the scientific arguments for God. Literally ALL of the scientific evidence used to support the arguments for God are widely accepted, mainstream scientific views & theories. The cosmic fine tuning, the beginning of the universe, and the specified, instructional (functional) information in life are but three examples of scientific evidence which is nearly universally recognized & accepted, for which the conclusion "God exists" is the best explanation. The secular scientists are so desperate to avoid God that they have to invent all kinds of alternative, fanciful explanations to explain the origin of these scientific facts, but none of them work - unless you have a theory that I am unaware of?

[@joshua2707]

Completely agree. "God of the Gaps" closes while "Time of the Gaps" opens.

[@chrispark2698]

@@nudsh 1. The beginning of the universe. Virtually all of our scientific evidence suggests that all spacetime/matter/energy had a beginning at a finite point in the past, before which, nothing existed. Since the universe began to exist, it must have had a cause. That cause would have to exist outside the universe itself, be immaterial, spaceless, timeless, powerful, intelligent, and have a freedom of the will - which is what everyone calls God. Every alternative naturalistic theory proposed so far to account for the cause and origin of our universe has failed. No satisfactory model exists. 2. The Fine Tuning of the Universe. There is no plausible, naturalistic explanation for why the universe contains the exact, perfect initial conditions and universal constants & laws pre-programmed into the fabric of reality itself, which allows the entire universe to even exist, apart from an intelligent mind which designed it that way. Every alternative naturalistic theory proposed so far to account for the cause and origin of the fine tuning of our universe has failed. No satisfactory model exists. 3. The specified, instructional (functional) information found in life (DNA, RNA, dGRNs). In all of human experience, the only way that data becomes organized in a specific way which relays instructional or functional information, is due to a mind. No natural process can plausibly describe why the specified information in DNA can become organized in the way it is. No satisfactory theory exists. All naturalistic theories which attempt to describe the origin or cause of these three scientific facts fail. If you know of any naturalistic theory which is able to describe any one of these 3 phenomena, please let me know.

[@bryarch]

So glad I stumbled upon this youtube channel. Such great information! I look forward to all your videos!

[@Daily_Dose_Of_Wisdom]

Thanks & glad you’re enjoying!

[@ThreeWishes777]

Science and my experiences have brought me back to God. For me God exists

[@x1nightskyx]

😂

[@kemcoleman955]

ABSOLUTLEY AMAZINGLY AWESOME SESSION!!!!!!!!!!!

[@csmoviles]

Thank you both for your ministry. May God be glorified through both of your 🙏💝🙏💝🙏🙏

[@HarryNicNicholas]

god is on the way pout. you should check the polls.

[@NA-nc5dg]

The ministry of mis-information? Nah I'm good. If you want to remain ignorant that's on you.

[@danh7447]

What this tells me is,God is amazing way beyond our understanding.

[@Radrook353]

I don't claim to fully comprehend the personality of the mind revealed in nature. However, that there is a mind manifested in nature is far too glaringly evident to ignore unless one is fanatically averse to the concept based on some traumatically induced psychological anomaly.

[@DeanLemm2]

I will have to rewatch this a few times-a lot to digest. Thank you for posting this interview.

[@Daily_Dose_Of_Wisdom]

You’re so welcome!

[@DartNoobo]

Dr Meyer has his own KZbin channel as well

[@mariaeugeniamairenaizuriet8633]

Well…after reading the comments from all my beloved fellow viewers of this video, I can just add that I endorse them all and that I love Stephen Meyer…! He’s a golden human string of God in our lives…⭐️

[@derhafi]

He is a demonstrable liar who works for a propaganda mill....you are adoring a chalratan

[@BrianWright-mi3lc]

So thrilled to see you sit down with Dr. Meyer. Wow!

[@Daily_Dose_Of_Wisdom]

He’s the man!

[@BrianWright-mi3lc]

@@Daily_Dose_Of_Wisdom Really is! Incredible to see how God has ramped up the world of Apologetics in the past few years through faithful and intelligent men, yourself included my friend. And I'll say it again, absolutely stellar guests/collaborations lately!

[@RogerMiller-td5yc]

When you find out that a protein must not only be correct for the function, but also be folded up perfectly is when you find out that evolution is pseudoscience

[@roddycavin4600]

Not forgetting the amino acids must fit in the right sequence perfectly.

[@stephenmosley5189]

Evolution is in fact not pseudoscience, and creationists do concede that organisms do go through changes through mutation, change meaning “evolve”, the idea that evolution is directly involved in and the beginning of creation is pseudoscience. A detail that I think is important to acknowledge.

[@numbers7n]

​@stephenmosley5189 Yes... to be specific, universal common descent and the primordial soup claims are pseudoscience....

[@NickMak-m2c]

@@numbers7n Eh, I still think it's possible that God could create a system that could have these qualities arise. I think that'd only be more the glorious, really--though, I suppose if one is possible so is the other. That if you could tip the end dominoe and get a zebra by building paths that could lead out to horse, camel, and a plethora of other ungulates, you of course could just walk up to the front of line and flick the 'zebra' domino down.

[@numbers7n]

@user-wr2cd1wy3b Yes, He could... And, as others suggest, he could build systems that have age or the appearance of age in them, as when he built man & woman. (He created them as adults, not as children. He created chickens, not eggs, etc.) I look to the Cambrian explosion, as so many new forms just "appeared" at the same time. Evolution has no real explanation for this. God speaking it into existence is more plausible to me.

[@dukenails7745]

How logical can be beautiful and spiritual. Fantastic video.

[@D12Min]

Stephen Meyer may well be the most intelligent human being that I´ve ever witnessed. I have never seen him "wobbled" by any arguments adduced against his claims.

[@galileog8945]

Surely you are joking.: hard to find a Christian apologist dumber than Meyer.

[@airpollotoledo]

God bless your ministry always brada!

[@Daily_Dose_Of_Wisdom]

Thanks!!

[@wandaprubant2082]

One of the best things Ive ever listened to, even though I had to do mental summer - saults to understand it all.

[@traceyfonda5300]

Yes, that is me too. I need simple words spoken so that I can understand what Dr Myers is saying.

[@jennacoffey4845]

*somersault

[@andybricks576]

@@jennacoffey4845 Yeah, I got lost when I read "summer - saults". I was very confused by what was being said. I finally realised they meant "somersault".

[@FinnSwede906]

This is an excellent interview, this is my first time on this channel but I liked and subbed!

[@Daily_Dose_Of_Wisdom]

Welcome aboard!!

[@Skashoon]

Dr. Meyer puts it brilliantly beginning at 4:00 the most salient points were expounded. And earlier, pointing out the pejorative nature of Wikipedia pages summarized my thoughts, too. One must be mindful of this bias whenever citing Wikipedia as a source. Dr Meyer gives a brilliant, compelling and coherent rebuttal to Darwinian evolutionary postulates and assumptive conclusions. My mind has definitely been expanded to refute evolutionary assertions by those who ascribe to scientific or mathematics to explain creation and the universe. I’m grateful for his articulate discussion. Wow!

[@corning1]

This video changed me, and if I’m not crazy you read my comment. Thank you. I just couldn’t explain it.

[@derhafi]

I'd rather go with, very likely indoctrinated as a child and scientifically illiterate. than "crazy"

[@marcelsimon6425]

We know that we dont know. Science doen't need to fill the Gaps with wildcards. Science is the process of explaining and understanding the reality, not telling storys.

[@angelalewis3645]

Such a wonderful conversation!

[@Bellamia888]

😅Thank you for your program and your guests. This is my first time listing. Peace

[@chyfields]

My own dreams are so vivid they are convincingly real whilst I am experiencing them. I assume that our Creator is an extraordinarily gifted dreamer.

[@acreativblkmind]

Thanks for asking him this. He broke it down perfectly. Just going to timestamp this 45:24 so I can revisit

[@corrysmith]

God is good!

[@Daily_Dose_Of_Wisdom]

AMEN

[@mirandahotspring4019]

Any god in particular? There are rather a lot of them. Hindu, for example, have 33 major gods in the Vedas and hundreds in the Puranas.

[@maliquesmith2311]

@@mirandahotspring4019 Jesus fool

[@corrysmith]

@@mirandahotspring4019 Duh Okay! You think you're the first arrogant sarcastic jerk to come up with that ignorant garbage. Try to at least be original.

[@ciscornBIG]

​@mirandahotspring4019 this was supposed to be your big mic drop moment wasn't it? Lmao

[@Retriever-nk8nl]

Hej Daily Dose of Wisdom, thank you very much for your first-class work and all the great contributions. Many blessings and greetings from Berlin, Germany.

[@misteranderson2850]

Just found your channel. Awesome interview. Blessings!😊

[@setsappa1540]

Thank you! Remarkably well structured arguments were I heard many ideas before but this definitely deepened my grasp of quite a few them. I am painfuly unadequate but these themes do not leave my mind and its both a pleasure and pain watching it slowly clearing itself up. What an exelent discussion! What enrichment! Thank you!

[@zzycatch]

"Eugenics, fully eradicated in the US in the 1920's" Planned Parenthood called.

[@rayhill5767]

Your the kind of person that calls The Republican Party the Party of Lincoln Fully understanding that you’re twisting reality

[@zzycatch]

@@rayhill5767 let me guess, you think "The parties switched!"

[@rayhill5767]

@@zzycatch Oh yeah and Dixie Crats were liberal. Whatever weirdo

[@zzycatch]

@@rayhill5767 I mean. You're the one dumb enough to think that the two parties matter, but whatever. Also, you don't seem to understand eugenics or how Planned Parenthood is opt-in eugenics as it's clientele is not evenly distributed across all demographics. But you probably want socialism, so keep proudly reaching for the middle.

[@ScreamingatWhispers]

The moral instinct that propagates the evolution of good behavior versus bad behavior is evident in the repetition of good behavior. It is its own reward and bad behavior is forced out by the moral majority. This is seen as wisdom in the proverbs. Every good and perfect gift comes from above. The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom and knowledge of the holy One is understanding. Even morality has to have an origin 🙏✝️

[@danielehiagwina]

Wonderful discussion 😊. I thank God for the grace of knowing Him in my experience through the sacrifice of our Lord Jesus Christ, because personally, my mind has always been very curious about the existence of everything. I'm sure if I didn't have this privilege, I would have been attracted by atheists thinking. I've always believed that experience trumps knowledge. When a person comes to a point of experiencing God and His glory in its human reality, it begins to see the hidden wisdom of His OMNIPOTENCE and awesome power. Thanks for the interview. Really enjoyed it.

[@kos-mos1127]

You would not be attracted to atheist thinking. No one gets attracted to atheistic thinking. They become atheist through the realization that the God of the Bible is made up.

[@HarryNicNicholas]

just look up the dover trials, creationism should be buried it's been dead for so long, it's just a cheap excuse to get god into schools for another hour, meyer knows this. ID, creationism and irreducible complexity should be an embarrassment to religion it's so badly thought out. it's DESPERATION on religions part keeps it going. and you can't prove god exists anyway, all meyer could do (if he were an actual scientist) is show that NATURE did it, your god hides so i can have free will, there CANNOT be evidence of god anywhere can there you banana.

[@jannenreuben7398]

Omnipotence? Your god had to have Israelites paint their doors on the night of the passover because he was too stupid to work it out for himself. That was before he went on to murder all those kids. What a guy.

[@PaulC-je9gw]

Science is the process of discovering how the natural world works. It’s always open ended. This argument can all be distilled down to god of the gaps.

[@crackheadbiden3273]

And science has actually shown life starting on its own and evolving requires massive amounts of “evolution of the gaps”.

[@derhafi]

@@crackheadbiden3273 "“evolution of the gaps” you mean, that there are some things we don#t know in detail? That is true. We do however know enough that an interference by some ill-defined god...sorry Intelligence :), which appparently is not subject to the known laws of physics, that interacts with the fabric of our reality in ways that have thus far eluded every controlled experiment ever performed in the history of science. Well, we know enough that this hypothesis is rightly considered garbage.

[@crackheadbiden3273]

@@derhafi Nonsense. You obviously aren’t educated in science. A living cell capable of dividing requires a genome with a minimum of 473 genes, a form of metabolism, hundreds of proteins and a functional cell membrane…..all of this has to be created at the same time since none can exist outside of a living cell. Fact. Secondly, astrophysics say fine tuning when looking at the creation of Carbon. You don’t want to debate me….just take the loss now.

[@derhafi]

@@crackheadbiden3273 "A living cell capable of dividing requires a genome with a minimum of 473 genes, a form of metabolism, hundreds of proteins and a functional cell membrane….." Do you really think life started out with modern cells? Sure, it is me who isn't "educated in science" Repeating Dr. Tours lies is not shinging a ver educated light on you buddy. "Secondly, astrophysics say fine tuning when looking at the creation of Carbon." Carbon is forged in the furnis of a star. A well understood process....what about this requres a fine tuning that nature can not provide by itself? Or, in other words: To which pseidoscientific fraud of the Discovery Institute were you listening this time that you think nuclear fusion somehow fuels this shi**y fine tuning argument? "You don’t want to debate me" I'm actually not sure if I can go so low.

[@robertjackson1407]

Thank you 😊

[@T.R.R.Jolkien]

These guys are my heroes… 😎

[@AlexPBenton]

So all that cosmology can be chalked up to “I haven’t heard a complete secular explanation for the origin of everything, so I choose to accept the one I heard first without analyzing it to a similar degree”

[@leandrorodriguesbernardino6225]

The scientific community generally rejects Intelligent Design as a form of creationism. The basic facts of evolution are not a matter of controversy in science. It’s important to note that science is a process that involves testing hypotheses against empirical evidence, and theories must be falsifiable and subject to change in light of new evidence.

[@derhafi]

"The scientific community generally rejects Intelligent Design as a form of creationism" Because that is what ID is, creationism in a wig, dressed up by the ill-named Discovery institute where they do no research at all, absolutely none, and of which one of its founders Howard F. Ahmanson, Jr. openly wants to replace democracy with a fundamentalist theocracy. An Institution that employs an entire stable full of demonstrable liars.

[@Frankaupolis]

Yet, how much does science not know? Why do "we" elevate and revere what scientists accept and reject? They don't even know why hiccups happen.

[@GaZonk100]

'basic facts of evolution'. . .furiously-irradiated Drosophila. . .uh-oh, just useless 'monsters'

[@spracketskooch]

Why reject Intelligent Design out of hand? Seems pretty stupid. Also, scientists should reject the multiverse hypothesis since it can't be falsified.

[@derhafi]

@@spracketskooch "Why reject Intelligent Design out of hand?" It is demonstrable, in fact demonstrated over and over again that it is nonsense; creationism in a wig pushed by liars....Maybe the simple fact that absolutely nothing we know about nature is due to "ID" , gives you an idea about it's usefulness. That's why it plays no role whatsoever in our attemt to understand reality. No results =no use. Easy as that. "Also, scientists should reject the multiverse hypothesis since it can't be falsified." The multivers is a mathematcally sound interpretation of a empercal evidence, and that is exactly how it is traeated by anone who has the slightest grasp on science. That you have fallen for creationistic propaganda in your view on that has no bearing on anything, it is solely your problem.

[@StudentDad-mc3pu]

Despite Stephem Myers obvious frustration in having his 'theories' relegated to 'not science', this criticism is reasonable. Intelligent Design is not science in that it is not based on observation (no non-material non-natural process has ever been observed), it is unrepeatable and untestable (if a mind capriciously decides to create life it is neither of these things) and it makes no predictions (for the same reason - although if there was a mind interfering in natural processes you might expect it to continue to do so, but it does not seem to be happening). It may well be a branch of philosophy - although even here it has many problems - but that is the best we can say.

[@linusloth4145]

Science is limited to natural matter and causes. It does not have the instruments or methodologies to study anything other than that. It cannot speak to the existence of anything else than matter and energy. Empiricism cannot be empirically proven so it can't even justify itself. Every architect or developer performs intelligent design. Biotechnologists create throught intelligent/rational design microorganisms with novel metabolic pathways. In this way the concept is repeatable and testable and rational

[@BoominGame]

You comment clearly shows you only know about the propaganda around the subject matter, and never really thought about it yourself.

[@linusloth4145]

@@BoominGame What propaganda? You have no substantial criticism on my comment and yet you allege that I never really thought about it?

[@StudentDad-mc3pu]

@@linusloth4145 Have I missed something?

[@StudentDad-mc3pu]

@@BoominGame Have I missed something?

[@WORDversesWORLD]

Thank you Heavenly Father for give me your wisdom that I don't need to rely on man, how wonderful it is to live in your presence'

[@IrishTechnicalThinker]

Mainstream science: Nothing exploded, inside nothing, with nothing, for nothing and by nothing. Me: Brilliant 😂

[@pufthedragonCCS]

based based based

[@radical.harmony]

SO GOOD!

[@optomix3988]

This a good video and Thank you for Dr. Meyer for all your hard work.

[@AsixA6]

Ahahaha! This is definitely a gawd of the gaps. Too funny.

[@kuakilyissombroguwi]

Great interview! Loving your channel.

[@oflunrazeuqram]

If scientific discoveries are pointing to God, then why do more than 90% of scientists DO NOT believe in the supernatural. Interesting

[@flatreality5139]

@oflunrazeuqram, because they just want to follow mainstream. If they go against it, they get shunned. OR, they just have an agenda. They want us thinking we are an insignificant spek in the universe. Peace!

[@danieljames4050]

They’re not. He’s cherry picking the data to suit his pre-existing belief in a Christian God, and discounting all the other versions of creationism.

[@BoominGame]

That's an easy one, because they are selected from school to be the most gullible lie repeating yes men parrots possible and not for their intellect. Then they are compartmentalised so they could not see the truth if it hit them in the forehead, because they only looking at "science" through a key-hole. Being good at math is not being intelligent its being able to abstract, it's like a game you learn to play and become good at it, its not a sign of intelligence, otherwise they would realise what they do is Kabbalah.

[@julierunnells7564]

Because Stephen Meyer is a fraud who runs a propaganda mill looking to create a Christian theocracy in America and everything this channel promotes is pure misinformation for extremely sheltered victims of religious fundamentalist abuse. (I know the question is rhetorical. I just hope some of these people will seek a second opinion and claw their way back to the real world)

[@dannydetonator]

There is a problem of defining "God" scientifically. And for science, there is no notion of supernatural, because everything is natural. That's why scientists are inclined to think of supernatural in layman definition as unknown or yet unexplained. Despite that some phenomena cannot be explained today - or ever, there's no reason to believe its not natural. Only truly supernatural thing can be a religious God, and also not necessarily. Just as opposed to creation and creator, its a matter of personal worldview and is seperated from science as belief. No religious beliefs have place in empirical science (psychology is not exactly it). So, as more you know - like true scientists should do - the more you can explain the universe(s) as natural and emerging from rules of it. Just never completely, like the provenance of the exact rules of physics which defines it. Even DNA is explainable in great part, so God can be mostly assigned to the gaps of our collective knowledge (or if you keep that belief - to everything and everrywhere). And that's ok, as main definition of God is - unknowable and unprovable. I'm not an atheist, btw.

[@ImTheREALCandyLane]

I am at minute 26 in your Lehman’s explanation, and by your explanation actually refutes the existence of God to the rest of us by saying astrological scientist found the beginning. Which I hope an intern helps them as previous atheist or agnostic or whatever to find God or theology is amazing and fantastic! But when God himself says in his word that he is from everlasting to everlasting means he always was, he had no beginning and the only beginning that was here for everything that you can see in the known universe he created. That is the beginning you see, the beginning of the universe but certainly not the beginning of God

[@tedtuttle6527]

Sounds 2 me materialists have to have MORE faith than creationists.

[@Daily_Dose_Of_Wisdom]

I would agree

[@mirandahotspring4019]

No, they're honest enough to simply say, "I don't know." than to throw a god in as an explanation.

[@tedtuttle6527]

@@mirandahotspring4019 sorry but if u believe nothing created something, now that takes faith. U r saying something that is unprovable. God can at least be an explanation of creation, that something had to be the creator of ALL these material things around us. We call Him God materialists call it unexplained. Now which one takes more faith???

[@mirandahotspring4019]

@@tedtuttle6527 Remind me again where I claimed nothing created something. You do realise the bible creation myth is only one of many. Dozens of other religions have their creation myths as well, each of them as plausible as the Christian one. If you want to claim a god did it, you then first you have to prove which god, or at least disprove all the others.

[@tedtuttle6527]

@@mirandahotspring4019 first the Christian God is the only religion that has a risen saviour that has defeated death all other religion's worship idols. Now concerning nothing created something out of nothing is a materialists explanation of the beginning of the u universe. So u have another explanation because I have never heard any other one.

[@davidbbeattie]

Interesting first question. Listening to the response you wouldn’t be out of line in thinking that the theory of evolution is pseudo science.

[@kos-mos1127]

Theory of evolution is science

[@Frankaupolis]

@@kos-mos1127 Still a theory though.. Science is still not sure WHY hiccups happen. Science should only be a fraction of what we rely on to try and explain things. Also mystery seems to be a fact. And oh is mystery beautiful.. isn't it? Where does beauty come from? Why can it make me cry? =·)

[@blanktrigger8863]

This is especially true given that Darwin took a gigantic leap from adaptation (which he observed) to evolution (which still hasn't been proved, and the evidence that adaptation operates by downsizing and not upgrading is increasingly disproving it).

[@richiejourney1840]

@@kos-mos1127science fiction yes. Nice mythology.

[@todradmaker4297]

@@kos-mos1127 Science - the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation, experimentation, and the testing of theories against the evidence obtained. Can you point to any experimentation that proves speciation? What about biogenesis? I can certainly understand physical adaptations that a species may develop over time to deal with environmental conditions, but radical reprograming of DNA strains seem like an extraordinary leap that requires extraordinary proof.

[@drew1412]

So remember everytime you get married or have sex it's with someone in your family bc we are all son's and daughters of does the sons and daughters of Noah's sons and wifes

[@SONofCOUL]

that's true of any and every belief system. if you're not related you cannot interbreed.

[@leemastro9904]

Thank you both, for making, and sharing, this excellent video. I have never doubted the existence, and influence, of our Lord, but I greatly enjoy hearing those much more intelligent than myself, explaining, with science, what I’ve always known, in my heart, and soul. Thanks again.

[@jeffseng6385]

What a great mind!

[@boni2786]

Great

[@shawnhendrix8773]

Love it. When he was talking about a multiverse, which is a newer concept it made me think more that sciences goal is to disprove God as the creator vs find the correct answer which is God created all things.

[@raulhernannavarro1903]

Well, no. The multiverse is not something that physicists pulled out of their asses. That's what the equations shows. Nature never makes just one thing of something.

[@Bigdadzhousegainz]

Answer to your statement is it’s not too far fetched to realize the little g god of this world, who was cast down into it, along with 1/3 of the fallen angels combined with the original watchers who then took to themselves daughters of men and I’m getting sidetracked but the little g does have tremendous sway and influence in all things earthly like media, politics, science, education, the church etcetera. So your statement holds true! Lastly but most importantly the little g of this world is not even comparable to the God of Everything!! In fact the little g is pretty pathetic honestly, and bc principalities can only work through agents and entities it’s kinda laughable that they think they have snowflakes chance in summer time!

[@marcelsimon6425]

Evolution is NOT the Origin of Life research! How mutations change species succesfully is observed and there ia no alternative explanatory model of these observed mechanisms. Mutatuions also are not simply the changing of bits, obviously. this is an abusive missinterpretation

[@davidspencer343]

So wait they found something we dont currently have a natural explination for, therefor magic? And thats not god of the gaps???

[@kageorge-n6s]

With all due respect to people's opinions, I think we spend too much time debating the obvious, if some people do not want to believe in God or His Christ,just let them be..after all The LORD'S omnipotence is not validated by people's opinions.

[@enochpage1333]

Thank you for a most engaging conversation!

[@DomDeDom]

If life is designed, then life is technology.

[@mmmail1969]

All "creation" is, is a form of technology and in the case of "man", a spiritual soul!

[@Frankaupolis]

Life was not designed. It always was. What is designed are the vehicles that bring Life to experience what this place (universe (also designed)) has to offer.

[@CelticSpiritsCoven]

A painting is designed. Is that also "technology"?

[@kos-mos1127]

@@Frankaupolis The Universe was not designed. The term Universe is not place. The Universe makes it possible to have a place.

[@Frankaupolis]

@@kos-mos1127 Not the way i see it. I see the Universe was designed. It's clear to me.