How quick is this 1994 Mustang GT? - Tested by GTC

[@969Garage]

95 gt owner here . Great video. You would think the price of all these bolt on would come down in price since how old the technology is now but they don't. Even at the end of it you'll be lucky to hit 300whp. My motor is still stock untill I muster up enough energy and money for Coyote swap. Best bang for buck imo

[@GrandTouringConcepts]

I absolutely agree! This car dynoed out at ~280-290 HP at the wheels and to go fast by today's standards can be quite the financial commitment. I've adopted the position that a reasonably affordable car that has the power potential to run low 13's to 12's without drag prep is a really good all around street car. This car would be capable with a bit better tire, a more favorable DA, and shifting it aggressively. Regardless, they are very fun to work on, and no matter where you begin, you can enjoy real benefits to the improvements you make. Thanks for watching, commenting, and especially subscribing, I hope to hear from you in future videos! - Darren

[@78jiver]

I thought it should have been faster but I’ve learned that good tires and suspension really put the power down, down side is with all that traction you can say bye bye to the t5 😂

[@RidingtheReaper]

Hey guys! Damn I thought you guys were out of the game completely. It's been soo long. Super excited that you are making content again. Huge welcome back.

[@GrandTouringConcepts]

It's always been a passion of our to make fun automotive content, but the real challenge can be to find the time to put it all together. Looking to change that this year. How are things in the car scene down in SA?

[@RidingtheReaper]

@@GrandTouringConcepts been really quiet now that it's winter this this, but the hardcore enthusiasts are still out here doing their thing 💪😎

[@David-nh2ho]

I've got a 95 5.0 5 speed with a short throw shifter pulleys shorty headers fresh tune up clutch throttle body air intake ac delete 373 gears on coilovers with tubular suspension front & rear leaving out some things. Stock cam heads intake upper an lower. The car is surprising for what it is now! I plan on going 306 stroked HCI an I'm sure I'll be happy with her!!

[@bullet2096]

Love these Mustangs. Your videos are helpful. Going to have to burn out the rubber control arm bushing like you said. The drill bit jack didn’t work.

[@GrandTouringConcepts]

Glad to be of help! I have had to do 2 sets of bushings using fire, but sometimes you get lucky. Sorry to hear it wasn't the case for you.

[@302hobronco]

I figured it would have been faster. Maby it needed a cam? I stroked my 94 to 331 with all the bolt ons as well. Haven't taken it to the track, but in the dyno, it made 368hp and 398tq at the rear wheels.

[@shoveI]

Those tires cost it most of a second, possibly with help from the trac lock if it's been overdosed with modifier.

[@GrandTouringConcepts]

This one has a TFS Stage 1 cam and the car runs well enough, but the elevation and density altitude is the killer to NA power here. The elevation, 4,300 ft or so on this test. It does take a huge toll on the performance of a NA engine. Using the Dragtimes DA correction calculator, If the run were at sea-level it would have potentially ran 13.6 @105. This car dynoed about 285 to the tire some years ago if our notes are correct. I think that 331 of yours should certainly run hard. Thanks for commenting!

[@projectracingtheory4125]

Great video 👍🏼🏁Thanks for sharing!

[@GrandTouringConcepts]

Thanks for watching! Great channel you have there as well!

[@projectracingtheory4125]

@@GrandTouringConcepts thanks I’m still trying to figure it out 😅😁

[@Boba_fehtt]

My cars built almost the exact same way but mines an auto with 2.73 gears lol I still get 7 second 0-60 times but if I got the gears my dad says it’ll go up another second in 0-60 like 6.2 or something lol I love this car have had it for 10 years and drive across America twice in it from nor cal to Maryland and it did great 😅

[@claybrown1619]

Nice build but I guess that the tires and the TFS STREET HEAT INTAKE TOP END KIT & I didn't see anything mentioned on if it was TUNED or UNDERDRIVE PULLIES or REAR CONTROL ARMS cuz my 94 C. YELLOW 5-SPEED 306ci TFS TRACK HEAT INTAKE TOP END-11R-HEADS KIT-STG.2 CAM, BBK 75MM THROTTLE BODY, 76MM MASS AIR METER, 36LB. INJECTORS, 255LPH. FUEL PUMP, MSD IGNITION-6AL, TIME RETARD, COIL, TUNED-PMS, UNDERDRIVE PULLIES, LOWER REAR CONTROL ARMS, EIBACH SPORT LINE LOWERING SPRINGS, BBK SHORTY HEADERS, OFF ROAD H-PIPE, 2-CHAMBER FLOWMASTERS, PRO 5.0 SHORT THROW SHIFTER, 410 GEARS, CENTER FORCE DUAL FRICTION CLUTCH 75-HP SHOT NOS, and it has ran 11.77sec 112mph in the 1/4 on MICKEY T's and I still drive it just about every day but it is good to see you guys still getting it done Brother and it's really good to see our SN-95's out there laying it down cuz with these newer war horses out now it's almost impossible to compete I'm considering dropping in a GEN-2 or GEN-3 COYOTE and calling it a done deal of course after a few mods but I look forward to seeing your next new video man God Bless 🙏✝️🙏

[@KNS_Racing]

Well, that was disappointing. I saw the comment about the da being 4000+. Still crazy that a few thousand dollars worth of parts only got it down to a low 14. I'm sure some lower treadwear tires and a higher rear gear ratio would get it to low 13s. Still have a soft spot in my heart for these cars, they sound wonderful.

[@Rocksoup77]

Should've been a lot quicker than that with those mods.

[@GrandTouringConcepts]

This one is hampered by elevation, 4,300 ft or so on this test, is the big factor. It does take a huge toll on the performance of a NA engine. Using the Dragtimes DA correction calculator, if the run were at sea-level it would have potentially ran 13.6 @105.

[@leroybrown7494]

I would say mid 13's at the track with practice is about right , sounds tuff and its a 5spd so its a win win

[@danialphaomega]

In my experience the trick flow TW heads were terrible they always bend pushrods when you reved to the moon, BUT the AFR 165cc street heads were the BEST not only could you pass emissions but acted well with boost, but before that adding some 42lbs injectors, a 90mm PRO-M MAF, 75mm T-body, longTubes, 1.7 rocers,and a gt40 or explorer intake with gasket match porting and polishing w/ spacer, and upgraded fuel pump, and some donner parts from a 93 cobra 5.0 you get forged pistons mix that with some forge connecting shotpeened rods,and fabbing up the stock sterl crank knife egde and balancing it, add a ABC ford cam & pulleys matched with a beefed up T-5 5spd trans and you were easily hitting 400+HP with some light dyno tunning which was the limit for the stock block of the SN95 due to the block not having enough webbing unlike the older ones heck you would make a say trip to old Mexico wrecking yard and get a stock iron block from the old marquis that ford made for Mexican taxi fleet from the pre 80s that had way more lower valley webbing making them way stronger than a truck block and they could handle a bit over 800hp, but anyways, then you either had to make a choice of either going full 9" rear with a spool or taking that 8.8 and sleeving and trusting it and setting it with a pair of CrV shafts so your aftermarket pion gears would not break them teeth from the MUST have set of sticky icky ET drag street tires. Yes back then we had to mix and match like Legos 😂 but my old 94 GT vert ran the 1/4 12.4 @ just shy of 120mph if memory serves me right i do believe she had more but traction was not my besti.... power shifting my moded T5 and trying to keeping that old horse stright was tricky because i had NO ABS or Traction control but luckily i had a quick non hydro asist. steering R&P and that old pony had a tendency to whip sideways if you couldn't handle her! She was PURE RAW POWER not like the 2.5-3 ton boats nowadays filled to the brim with traction,body,ABS power modules that give the false impression that YOU can drive like Gone in 60 seconds Nicolas Cage 😂NO my pony was lean tipping a CAT scales wet at 3,400lbs of course i did some trimming and gutting of things i did need, but anywho.. i got kicked out at my local drag strip because i didn't have a cage nor helmet or fire extinguisher so in essence i got kicked out for being too fast 😂😂12s may not be considered fast by todays standards but 20 something years ago i could beat almost every stock sports cars at the stop light. Yeah those were some good 'ol memories

[@jasons6573]

I thought it would be about 14.1 but I was really hoping it would get a 13. How accurate is that Dragy? Glad to see another GTC video 🎉

[@GrandTouringConcepts]

We were initially skeptical of such a cheap race logger like Dragy, but it's very close, within a tenth or so and less than 1 MPH out. Thanks for supporting the channel and glad we can entertain!

[@apexandtalon]

How slow is a stock car? Air temp? Elevation?

[@GrandTouringConcepts]

Magazine tests back in the day report a 15.2 at 89.6 MPH, for a stock unit. You're the first to ask about run details before rendering judgement which we are glad to see! This run had some conditions, the effective altitude (DA) was around 4,300 ft, and this pass had the test driver and a Dragy operator (passenger). Using the Dragtimes DA correction calculator, If the run were at sealevel it would have potentially ran 13.6 @105. Dropping the passenger could have resulted in another tenth or two, or +2 MPH for this run. -Darren

[@trevorstowell6043]

I have a stock 1994 gt with a Cai, and cobbled cables exhaust with lowering springs and the crappy 2.73 gears... it does a 9.50 in the ⅛th mile... maybe it's because you spun 1st gear but i thought it'd be alot faster with heads cam intake...

[@alvin7089]

Definitely the hookup. A stock GT can run a 14.30-14.40

[@NewEdgeDesigns]

Should be quicker than that.

[@rzjk301]

You must be at a higher elevation for those low numbers. My 1995 GT with 3.73, T5, Mac Long tubes & H-Pipe with 3 chamber flow Masters and under drive pulleys ran 14.1 at 99MPH with crappy kuhmo tires. I see he changed the CAM. You must tune this car when you change the CAM in order to wake up the performance.

[@GrandTouringConcepts]

You got it right on with the elevation, 4,300 ft or so on this test. It does take a huge toll on the performance of a NA engine. Using the Dragtimes DA correction calculator, If the run were at sea-level it would have potentially ran 13.6 @105. This car is tuned for the cam of course. Our own 1995 GTS with similar mods to your car ran 89 MPH at our local track back in 2005, again, altitude penalty. Thanks for commenting!

[@mlow587]

is that a 8;8 or 7.5 rear and what is the stock gear ratio of those Gts?

[@GrandTouringConcepts]

These are 8.8" rear axles, which is the case for all V8 Mustang's from 1985 to present. The factory gear ratio on this car was 2.73:1 and it's now a 3.73 which is a quite common aftermarket selection for these car and Foxes. Great question! Thanks for watching and commenting! - Darren

[@2camsam]

For that high of altitude not to bad. A set of sticky tires would do wonders.

[@brandonrohrer7914]

I'm around cincinnati if you wanna do my 2001 camaro z28 a4 with 2.73 gear all stock

[@samotrx7]

Guessing 13.7 @ 105 on those tires

[@wayneburbrink1215]

Deep forest green 1994 gt 117,000 orignal miles ford installed cold air with ford calibration

[@GrandTouringConcepts]

Cool Mustang! My own is a DFG 1995 GTS, love the color! - Darren

[@frankenstein01]

hmm, another k&n sticker should make it faster

[@GrandTouringConcepts]

Thats or dozens and dozens of Summit racing stickers maybe. Sticker-bomb an entire fender with Summit to let everyone know we're serious! LOL, Thanks for watching and commenting!

[@frankenstein01]

@@GrandTouringConcepts very good idea, that's at least 50hp!

[@randalcoffman1979]

Faster