How Russian Nuclear Bomber Works? Tu 160 Tu 22 Tu 95

#nuclear #russia #plane
These are Russian nuclear bombers built during the Soviet era, specifically the Tu-95 and the Tu-22M.
A little history lesson: during the Cold War, American planes, primarily the B-52 bombers, played a crucial role with At least 12 aircraft would take turns to fly, thus remaining airborne almost 24 hours a day.
During the Cuban Missile Crisis, the Soviet Union's mainstay bomber was the Tu-95, which was designed in the 1950s has limited capabilities. This led to an arms race between the two superpowers.
In response, the US developed the Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk, the B-1 Lancer, and the B-2 Spirit stealth bombers, which are billion-dollar aircraft.
The answer to the arms race was the Tu-160, also known as the White Swan.
The TU 95 weapon system a total of eight KH-101 can be carried under four double missile pylons in addition to six kh-55 in the
Internal rotary missile launcher the kh101 is a long-range standoff Weapon.
It is carried and launched by this bomber aircraft which is larger and
Heavier than the kh-55 but retains a similar design with a drop down Engine.
Externally it has some similarities with a US AGM 158 Air launch cruise missiles,
Though the Russian missile has significantly longer range
The KH 101 is armed with a conventional or tactical Nuclear
Warhead and has a range of 3000 km depending on the version
the missile weights 2200 to 2400 Kg and carries a 400 to 450 Kg
Instagram
/ aitelly3d
Twitter
/ aitelly3d
We make it on Blender
Download it is free and Safe
www.blender.org/download/
Peace Out
As a small channel, we encourage you to share our videos.
However, please be advised that any unofficial translations or editing of our work in any medium will be considered a breach of our intellectual property rights.
We apologize for the legal language, which arises from our experiences dealing with a lot of duplicated content.
This has been a result of big channels duplicating our Videos, ripping our original hard work, which we have created from scratch, from modeling to rigging to animation and rendering.
As a result, we've had to involve lawyers.

[@Aitelly]

How a B-52 Bomber Works kzbin.info/www/bejne/hYi8cneXrM-jaK8

[@faithosadebe5293]

In your dreams, if you believe the Aircraft carrier can defend itself from Kinzhai missiles.. It failed to defend itself from Houthis drones attack..

[@MACRONOne]

How propaganda works, repeat BS often enough for Gullible Joe & Anita to fall for it. Aitelly. What a bunch of amateurs.

[@MACRONOne]

@@faithosadebe5293 They're still 'living the dream' , where the West was able to manipulate the rest by propaganda and pushing them around by sanctioning them or bombing them. Well, the paradigm has completely shifted since Syria and Russia's intervention there. Western hegemony is poof, waining. We are now at the point where countries openly defy the evil empire, which Aitelly supports, and sometimes even giving them the boot(Africa)(Middle East) and of course Europe with Russia pounding NATO in Ukraïne. SCO and BRICS are the new hot players on the block and Aitelly for one, will come to the conclusion that supporting the losing team will not be in their investors' best interests in the long run. Let's see how long before they jump ship.

[@terefefeyssa877]

B-52 is nothing to me. Garbage!

[@faithosadebe5293]

@@terefefeyssa877 he just showed how bias he is.. Instead of making the topic open for discussion, the best part is that he will definitely get paid from youtube.. That for sure.. B-52 that needs 8 engines to fly, special airfield, yet can only carry lesser payload that can be compared slightly above the TU-22M bomber..

[@deniscicic8074]

"Gatling gun can down one or two Kinzhal missiles ..." ... is this a parody channel?

[@Wyomingchief]

I'm guessing you don't understand how close in weapon systems work?😂😂 The the Russians also have this capability, it's not some made-up parody. If you were familiar with modern missiles missile defense and such you might understand that

[@woodonfire7406]

After everything we heard about the Patriot system in this country 🇺🇦, I don't think it's a parody

[@yvesdupont7595]

Indeed doubtful.

[@ariffurqan9862]

Do what? ​@@woodonfire7406

[@momcilopucar8749]

​@@WyomingchiefThe fact is US radars cannot even see Russian Kinzhal Hypersonic missile let alone to shut it down. Get up dated then talk till then.🤫🤐

[@prolifeunity]

You're bragging about America's scramjet hypersonic missile. That's funny, it doesn't exist yet! On the other hand, Russia has been using hypersonic missiles for many years. They're even on their third generation!

[@MegaPopilu]

<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="50">0:50</a> Error: It is not one of the largest, it is the largest supersonic military aircraft in the world.

[@The_Govermnent]

Yes that's what being one of the largest means

[@abrokanfxr3388]

@@The_Govermnent sry you wrong on this buddy "the " in this the no1 largest,

[@faithosadebe5293]

​@@The_Govermnentare you that blind or slow??..it the largest not one..

[@The_Govermnent]

@@abrokanfxr3388 yes but saying one of the largest doesn't exclude it being the largest.

[@MegaPopilu]

@@The_Govermnent Well now we are moving away from the military and into semantics. "One of the largest" definitely does not mean "the largest". It is simply knowledge of the language. You should write "is the largest". This is the only way to correspond to the truthfulness of the facts.

[@pilotmanpaul]

Russian plane design is just so sexy.

[@igorb2908]

yes right, and they carry tons of sex A-bombs LOL

[@elnewbie2611]

I agree, don't get me wrong American planes like the F-15 and F-22 are beautiful but seeing a Russian Su-35 or Su-57 is just another level of beauty, it's a shame these beautiful machines are made to kill each other :(

[@user-fh6jp8ug1q]

Most of them are copy of american

[@happy-us9mh]

@@user-fh6jp8ug1q lol usa

[@ThunderRods7-gz1jo]

@@user-fh6jp8ug1q funny how the f-35 is based on yak-141 and f-15 is based on Mig-25

[@user-ur2om5po3e]

TU- planes ✈️ are the beauty of Russian and worldwide aviation art.

[@smbrx]

+++

[@rushzeen]

so, don't mess with Russia

[@mohamednamani3320]

Never

[@terefefeyssa877]

Rush Zeen: I beg You pardon? 😠 😳😳😳

[@terefefeyssa877]

​@@mohamednamani3320: What? 😳

[@apolloaero]

Exactly, don't mess with russia or they'll whine and wag their nuclear button for the 20th time. Even Kim is getting jealous

[@terefefeyssa877]

@@apolloaero : I didn't understand your point. 😠

[@dinho890i]

There is no way to take out a hypersonic kinzhal my guy No way

[@apolloaero]

Kinzhal isn't a modern hypersonic, unless you want to claim the US had hypersonics in the 50s with High Virgo and GAM-87 Skybolt. Also, Patriot has already shot it down, along with the Zircon

[@alexeyeryomin2962]

@@apolloaero Это украинцы вам сказали?

[@levenusine5095]

Only an American could imagine it's old defense systems destroying 3 of 4 incoming hypersonic missiles.

[@ENDtheFED-it4bo]

Laughs in: DARPA.

[@Wyomingchief]

Patriot and Thad have entered the conversation😂😂

[@levenusine5095]

@@Wyomingchief Patriot was already destroyed. They have nothing to say in the chat

[@Wyomingchief]

​@@levenusine5095really that's funny because we've only sent two Patriot missile systems to Ukraine and both are still operational and they posted pictures of them recently. Germany's also in the process of sending another one. Keep believing the Russian propaganda and see how far it gets you. I mean hell this war is already over right?😂😂

[@Wyomingchief]

​@@levenusine5095I mean considering we've only sent two, Russia's claim to have destroyed five so far😂😂

[@aslamsardauna8944]

American hypersonic missile that doesn’t exist yet you are comparing it to existing hypersonic missiles of Russia

[@cherrypoptart2001]

Tu-160 is an absolute beauty piece of aviation, those blue after burners are some of the sexiest things u can see at an airport

[@2012isnear-my-my-my]

here is the true story of this planes. this guys were working n a gas station and and they were bored . so one day they got up and said f... it we are going to built a plane and they did and named it "White Swan" . so as luck will have it they built the most beautiful plane man kind has ever seen since . this is the farthest , highest . fastest biggest and most cargo carrying plane out there that was ever built as a bomber . the same guys built those shovels also i hear. if you dont believe me ask O'Bummer or O'Biden they will back up my story they used to live four houses down from that gas station and O' Biden was a poor black boy at the time.

[@laurajames2264]

But the white swan is Russian

[@user-ie3ks8cf4q]

​@@laurajames2264And so? Are you racist?

[@fingerprint8479]

Russians patience will not last forever...

[@terefefeyssa877]

What are you going to do? 🙄

[@fingerprint8479]

@@terefefeyssa877 There is nothing anyone can do.

[@terefefeyssa877]

@@fingerprint8479 : I do!😳

[@junalbinotv1196]

Nuclear bomb

[@fingerprint8479]

@@junalbinotv1196 Soom...

[@ThePiGuy-lm6os]

Props to the animators!

[@LOLONO666]

From Cuba it should not be too long to reach the usa

[@rustam5003]

After I saw that American air defend can hit hypersonic missiles I quit video

[@itsericzhou]

Tu-160 “white swan”😂 funny name for a plane that can send 12 hypersonic middles your way. Used it in a game and it’s funny af just overwhelming air defense

[@Wyomingchief]

Yeah too bad the real world's different😂

[@user-ie3ks8cf4q]

Bro, we call our howitzers "Gvozdika" ("Clove") and "Pion" 😅 Also we have heavy flamethrower systems called "Buratino" (like, Pinocchio) and Tosochka (which is soft name of TOS (heavy flamethrower system)) 😅

[@Zordeos]

​@@user-ie3ks8cf4qа ещё есть тюльпан, хризантема и акация. Потому что оружие это красиво )))

[@Zordeos]

Е понял что там с подавляющим ПВО. В реальность Ту-160 пускает ракеты за 3-4 тысячи километров от цели. А значит никакое ПВО его не достанет. Проблема только приблизиться на это расстояние. Именно поэтому во время холодной войны эти самолёты находились на боевом патрулировании в нейтральном воздушном пространстве. Почти постоянно. Чтобы если война начнется они могли быстро приблизиться и атаковать, не преодолевая ПВО над Европой.

[@itsericzhou]

@@Wyomingchief no tu160 has been shot down in a war yet, albeit the russians dont deploy them much due to limited production capabilities. and yes cruise missiles are really good at keeping at the launching jet safe since they outrange most SAMS.

[@pigmoonk2545]

<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="123">2:03</a>. The engine for the Tu22M is the NK-144-22 and not the VD-7. You are referring to the engine of the Tu-22 and not the M

[@Aitelly]

Thanks for your feedback

[@onevablo1692]

@@Aitelly You talked about many missiles that these bombers carry, but you forgot to include in this list the anti-ship cruise missile “KH-22/32” for the TU22M carrier.

[@robertbaisagale1685]

Mother Russia's war birds are just above the rest...these aircrafts are like art work they are breathtakingly beautiful

[@karmaandkerosene2885]

Non-English speaker writing your titles?

[@Falcon-FFY]

Whats The right title?

[@karmaandkerosene2885]

@@Falcon-FFY Either "How a Russian Nuclear Bomber Works" or "How Russian Nuclear Bombers Work"

[@cherrypoptart2001]

@@karmaandkerosene2885 and ? they're all nuclear capable bombers, he just changed the title to specify their names lol

[@MrJesterJam]

"Non-English speaker writes your titles"

[@karmaandkerosene2885]

@@cherrypoptart2001I didn't make up the rules of the English language - but fortunately my generation was taught them in school.

[@GreatBaIlsOfire]

I’m obviously not sure if the Russians would or could use a Kinzhal on a carrier but for the Tu-22 they would most likely use the KSR-5 Kingfish. Also worth mentioning that US carriers are not designed to protect themselves much. That’s the job of the Carrier strike group.

[@gabrielarellano4696]

Tu-22M aren’t powered by VD-7 engines, but by Kuznetsov NK-25. VD-7 were used on the previous Tu-22 Blinder.

[@quazars236]

beautiful graphics and animation! love your work pls stay on top.👌👍

[@miguelmatos9508]

As allways, nice job!

[@irwainnornossa4605]

Russians should've made something like TU-96. It would be like TU-95, but with 6 engines, much larger, with much greater carring capacity. That would be cool. Not today, it would be really obsolete, but back in the days.

[@aam_pro2245]

best channel i've come across so far, keep up the great work!

[@Aitelly]

Glad you enjoy it! we tried our best

[@Leonid_Brezhnev1]

the channel who doesnt know how the map of the USSR looked like? 00:06

[@kisuulebashir6065]

Please make a video about the B1 lancer

[@Aitelly]

Noted

[@user-lp5id9rm8e]

Your videos are amazing, brother

[@Thunderkorn]

These videos slap submarine stuff would be sick too !

[@SS-HansLanda]

thank you for explaining to maniacs how nuclear weapons work

[@oneshotme]

I very much enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up

[@roberthammer8635]

I Guess B1 lancer Video isint that far now. As always good content guys love it. I hope you guys will do Videos on Mv-22 Osprey, F22 Raptor and Mi28 in the coming future

[@drane10]

Americans: We need radar cross section of a bee so they cant see us coming. Russians: LET EM KNOW

[@hairi_deathwish9650]

would love to see more on russian equipments

[@shk0014]

Animations are top notch but you guys need to get your scripts vetted by a few more military buffs to get your facts right.

[@gonzogonzo3479]

Yeah!!! Without talking about Step 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8..... Thank you. Great Video 👍

[@Elfred-wu9pk]

Hi AiTelly, thanks for the great content. I would like to know how the wire guided rockets launched from manpads or Bradleys works. Thanks

[@kjolen]

Cool editing, enjoyed the video!

[@Aitelly]

Glad you enjoyed!

[@faithosadebe5293]

​@@Aitellyalso try to do your research well, be neutral.. So called Aircraft carrier defenses cannot, will not stop the kinzhai missile.. Haven't stopped Houthis drone, wanna stop kinzhai..

[@absiddique139]

Russian always build chipper than American but build affective ones.

[@igorb2908]

well not always but you're almost right - very often

[@salimabdatfouz7658]

Because the American army is corrupt in a clever way when it comes to dealing with paper work. Unlike russians who are straight foward.

[@PlsDontSuuue]

how's the 3 day special military operation going?

[@SwordManVX]

@@PlsDontSuuue Ask the Pentagon, that was their statement

[@PlsDontSuuue]

you do realize that when you account for GDP the prices are roughly the same right? do you understand how exchange rates work?

[@gyanrahashya6416]

I thing has always kept me wondering and that is - In 1995 the serbs shot down a f117 nighthawk, the plane fell down and got destroyed, but the remains or the carcass of the aircraft was more than enough for the Russians to reverse engineer the technology and get it's own F117, which didn't happen, I don't know what in the world prevented the Russians to build back such an awesome plane ? And second point is that why the Russians never tried to steal B-2 tech ? Someone please answer my curiosity

[@Palitraru]

Because they don't have money for it.

[@Zordeos]

Всё просто. Если есть РЛС с разными частотами, то все эти стелс самолёты видны. Я имею ввиду длинноволновые радары. Да, видны плохо. Но видны. То есть их местоположение становится очевидным. Да, навести ракету сложно. Но отправить перехватчики легко. А в воздушном бою у стелс самолётов нет шансов. Если мы говорим про 117 или спирит. Так что это хорошо против стран, не имеющих серьезных средств обнаружения. В конце концов сербы как-то сбили этот невидимый самолёт. Причем ракетой. Как думаешь, у них были новейшие системы? Нет. Это была старая система. И достаточно длинноволновой радар. Устаревший. С тех пор это учли. И новые системы имеют радары с разными частотами. Стелс самолеты это дорого. Системы, способные их обнаруживать с неплохой точностью гораздо дешевле. И ещё. Зачем нам, русским, такие самолёты? Ведь Америка или Китай тоже могут их обнаруживать. Где нам их использовать? Мы не вторгались в страны с устаревшей ПВО, как Ирак или Ливия. У Украины ПВО вполне неплохое. Даже в начале операции. А теперь там всё западное. Да и вообще, небо над старушкой Европой подсвечено со всех сторон. Любому стелс самолёту там конец.

[@Max_Jacoby]

Russians has a good knowledge of physics and don't need reverse engineering to find out something new. Right now USA is leading in AI and this is a weapon of future Russians have to be concerned.

[@Max_Jacoby]

@@Palitraru oh, please! Even North Korea has money for their nukes.

[@Palitraru]

@@Max_Jacoby because their nukes are way of their surviving. And look at their economy and live level of their citizens. Russia can't do it because they have opposition.

[@chbilalzafarbaharwal8962]

Great video

[@igorb2908]

it's no "Tu-22M" it's actually Tu-22M3, also there is no Tu-95 in service, Tu-95MS actually. Absolutely different types of the planes. And, how about the MiG-31K carrying a hypersonic "Kinzhal"? Nice stuff too. Don't forget about uboats with nuclear ballistic missiles. Well anyway get ready folks. The sooner you understand it's not your war the better. The less damage from the shockwave and radiation.

[@faithosadebe5293]

sorry, what is uboat?.. Who manufacture that..

[@igorb2908]

@@faithosadebe5293 you may call it submarine

[@faithosadebe5293]

@@igorb2908 okay.. Is it own by the US or russia

[@HKBronc]

Doesn't really seem like it's Russia's war, either. Three days, was it supposed to be? Your incompetence is being shown off on the world stage and the US ain't even got its hands dirty yet.

[@igorb2908]

@@HKBronc Three days? Don't repeat this kind of bull. "Three days operation" is a regular statement of the american propaganda. You spent your "three days" in Vietnam, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq. Just a three days, just four times.

[@froschschosch2348]

At what kind of altitude are those max speed numbers possible? And what would be possible on near ground lvl altitude?

[@tykobes4132]

Nukes detonated in the air have far less Fallout. It's when it's on the ground and launches up now radioactive dust. That "Falls-Out of the sky" 😅

[@mohd.iftekharulalamemad7148]

Please cover currently active bombers and avro Vulcan

[@chaturakarpe9897]

What is its defence systems ? And nice video 🎉🎉

[@AntPictures]

I think the nuclear explosion part is misleading. Nuclear bomb doesn't produce as much radiation and fallout as nuclear power plant explosion. The only two cities that were struck by nuclear weapons were rebuild and repopulated in years. So the notion that nuclear blasts on the other side of pacific ocean will have a meaningfull impact on the mainland is wrong.

[@user-bb5up7qk4e]

Хотите проверить на себе???

[@morfeicheg]

Yep. Those cities were struck by nuclear bomb, but all modern nuclear weapons are thermonuclear, which provide much less radiation and fallout.

[@user-ge2og2sl4n]

Amazing content ❤❤❤

[@user-xt7qn7pp5f]

Could you make a Gerald r Ford aircraft carrier video.

[@user-nw7ii5yf2n]

1)The KH-15 has been decommissioned, why mention it? But at the same time, KH-22 and KH-32 are mentioned only in one word at the end of the video. 2) The X-47M2 Dagger does not break through to the target at low altitude. This is an aeroballistic missile and it attacks its target from above. How can authors who have spent many hours on this material not know this? By the way, the KH-32 also hits the target in a dive (from 40 kilometers). Talking about the long-outdated Sea Sparrow (or automatic guns) to repel such threats is simply ridiculous. 3)What's the point of talking about the speed of an American hypersonic missile if it's not ready yet.

[@toady254]

Hey @AiTelly, I wonder, how can there be bombs inside the tu22m If the engines are in the exact same place ? <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="299">4:59</a>

[@ajoydheepakesh1780]

Very much impressive 3d animator in KZbin, you are

[@chaturakarpe9897]

Pls do one on b1 lancer an asq 161

[@102WorldNavy]

Good

[@Aitelly]

Thanks

[@ioanbota9397]

They are so powerful I like

[@pabloaranda1979]

Estaria muy bueno una version con doblaje español de este grandioso canal

[@fakesoundtrack1850]

<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="29">0:29</a> Ok, You included the countries of Eastern Europe (!) in the USSR, but why did you exclude the Soviet republics of the Caucasus and Central Asia from it?

[@Max_Jacoby]

Damn, not much people can earn $15M in their entire life and it's only the price of a single missile. I hope one day we stop this BS and begin to cooperate.

[@6602x]

no one has yet managed to intercept a supersonic kinzhal not a single country has such air defense to intercept Kinzhal 🇷🇺

[@user-iq6gp8qo8b]

🤣🤣🤣 Patriot already has. 1980's Patriots.

[@hankrearden5460]

@@user-iq6gp8qo8b No it hasn't. What Ukraine showed clearly wasn't a Kinzhal the nose cone wasn't even the same shape. Like the ghost of Kiev which didn't exist Ukraine lies a lot.

[@greyhound4647]

@user-iq6gp8qo8b just claim. The photo shown is part of ODAB 500

[@Wyomingchief]

​@@hankrearden5460you do realize that the kenzell missile is nothing more than an are launched ballistic missile? Ballistic missile defense has been something the United States has been capable of since the mid-1970s. The new modern Pac3 Patriot system is easily capable of shooting down a ballistic missile that is pretending to be a Hypersonic weapon. Now when they, the russian, managed to actually create a Hypersonic Glide vehicle that is capable of maneuvering while in flight, then get back to us. Oh by the way the US already has one of those it's just now going into production. You should probably familiarize yourself with it and pray to God we don't give it to the ukrainians😂😂

[@Wyomingchief]

Yeah look up the Mako Hypersonic Glide vehicle😂😂

[@Just_A_Random_Desk]

<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="315">5:15</a> Kinzhal is a BALLISTIC missile, NOT a sea-skimming cruise missile. Zircon which actually is a hypersonic cruise missile has to fly at altitudes around 40,000 feet to maintain that speed.

[@EksperHotelkin]

Think with your own head! Russia has everything! It's a superpower! It's time to stop Russophobia and sit down at the negotiating table!

[@penjelajahaspal2581]

Lucu sekali jika orang amerika bahwa 1-2 roket kecepatan 4-6kali kecepatan suara hanya dengan gatling gun 😂

[@crytp0crux]

Requesting a video on telescoped ammunition.

[@gvincent3246]

I don't think it's that easy to intersept hypersonic missile in its final stage.

[@gdbjrsghyrfvbht1237]

I don't think the bit on fallout is correct. Mid air detonation means no dust and even if it was surface detonation it's in the ocean so it's not kicking up dust.

[@alphacentaur4185]

Hello! It is not Russian air craft. It is Soviet air craft. If you say not the USA, but New York air craft

[@abhayjotsingh7043]

Can you make video on USS san antonio classes

[@nickkorkodylas5005]

Even with predictable trajectories I REALLY fucking doubt a freaking Sea Sparrow can reliably intercept an object moving at more than 5 mach. I know they are supposed to be highly modernized but they are still based on an over half century old design that was nearly deemed a failure at its initial operational deployment.

[@user-fr3ev3xi7f]

Do the Sr 71 black bird

[@yasserrezai4473]

Please 🙏 please 🙏 next video B1 lancer

[@Godgamer14905]

How Russian stil M1 ship launch Sam launcher works and how it's mechanism works?

[@rafapikulinski3066]

AITELLY PLESE MAKE AVIDEO ABOUT MAMMOTH TANK FROM C&C TYBERIUM

[@biosphere7762]

الله الحافظ من هذه الأسلحة المدمرة

[@TheJedimaster6788]

TU 160 is the sexiest plane in the WHOLE WORLD

[@sovngardeloka7263]

Do Kinzhal missiles

[@gunbuckybucketman4578]

Already done it.

[@Line_lines]

B-1 lancer 💪

[@mg63shooter83]

😂bro thinks anything can stop a mach 15 missile even a machine gin

[@alexh9716]

He really killed it with that lmao 😂 Like bro.. We ain’t fools lol TF you smoking 😂

[@IlyaPshenichny]

tu-95 cannot carry 8 rockets under wing because of significant wear of rocket holding elements or wear of the plane entirely. Usually not more than 4 rockets are on the board, often 1-2 per plane.

[@Infinix99916]

Wow..... kapalnya cantik sekali......🙂🙃 lihat.... itu seperti bebek angsa sedang terbang....🙃, ini sudah luar biasa.... aku suka kapal itu....🙂

[@salaudinayobi6997]

Thanks for this video to make by my demand....!

[@Aitelly]

It's my pleasure

[@salaudinayobi6997]

@@Aitelly Love & Respect...!

[@user-ie3ks8cf4q]

Wait, isn't Tu-160 is capable of carring the Kh-101 too?

[@abirmahmud3809]

I'm Back....... Old viewer🤟

[@Aitelly]

Thanks

[@cherrypoptart2001]

U didnt mention the ejection system of the TU-22, the crew ejects below the aircraft, not from the conventional top ejection, if the aircraft is lower than 300m of the ground it almost impossible for the crew to survive , That why in videos of the TU-22Ms crashing off the runways u never see the crew ejecting

[@Aitelly]

Noted

[@vladimirlatyshev8511]

Это справедливо только для Ту-22, в Ту-22М катапультирование происходит вверх, а под полом кабины находится технический отсек.

[@vladimirlatyshev8511]

@@Aitelly , пожалуйста, обратите внимание на мой комментарий

[@user-vm1xj2bb8p]

Fa-229 explore ya

[@AlexanderTch]

Kinzhal missile does not have wings and it cannot fly that low to the surface. It's opposite. It flies very fast on high altitude with hypersonic speed and then falls on a target. No modern anti-aircraft system of any country can intercept it. For now, it's technically impossible. Tu-22m is not carrier of Kinzhal hypersonic missiles. It carries another type of anti ship , anti aircraft carrier hypersonic missile named Kh-32. Older version was called Kh-22.

[@alexmoss3695]

Kinzhal have been intercepted many times by now... But no one will stop you from spreading lies.

[@user-iq6gp8qo8b]

Lmao, Kinzhals are easily intercepted even by 1980's tech.

[@AlexanderTch]

@@user-iq6gp8qo8b Lol. Show me videos or photos of those "interceptions".

[@TrusePkay]

​@@user-iq6gp8qo8bA nafo bot has appeared

[@Wyomingchief]

​@@TrusePkayor possibly just a sixth grader because you know it's not that difficult😂

[@Godgamer14905]

Describe Sam lauding mechanism of Russian stil M1 ship launch Sam system?

[@patrioticgunner8034]

The aircraft carrier isn’t stopping no damn hypersonic missiles that they can’t locate or knows when it was fired 😂😂😂That aircraft carrier is definitely becoming a submarine or reef if it’s the target of hypersonics

[@danielzivcic9579]

Pls f-22 raptor

[@ffg902]

You must be kidding me. Explain me how that carrier defences can defeat hypersonic missile? Sounds like impossible

[@diannoviardi]

its about the plane or about the bomb they carry?

[@russischpartisan3312]

Что бы авианосец смог использовать защиту, он должен уметь обнаруживать, отслеживать и просчитывать "Кинжал", он не сможет, никто не может, пока...

[@aleksandrsel267]

Авианосцы, в современной войне, имеют очень мало шансов... А вот дальние бомбардировщики, с развитием ракет и дронов (которые тоже можно сбрасывать с них, и управлять), более удобный инструмент.

[@Michael4x]

Your obsession with your logo placement is ruining what seems to be a good video. Looks like an armature work. Tune it down a little bit.

[@cryoshell99]

<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="11">0:11</a> wtf with map? Where is The Republic of Kazakhstan? And why is China painted as part of the USSR?

[@momcilopucar8749]

Video host isn't correct by saying that US can shut down Kinzhal Hypersonic missiles. US radars cannot even see let alon to shut down Kinzhal Hypersonic missile. 👉Gatling gun.👎

[@piotrd.4850]

Uhm.... no? Tu-22Ms verastile as they are, are only to be fitted with Khindzal, which is effectively aerobalistic missile, air launched Iskander (think ATACMSs) with 0,5 t warhead. Primary anti-ship weapons were Kh-22 ( AS-4 Kitchen ) and Kh-26 (AS-6 Kingfish ) - Ma4, 1t warhead monsters. Carriers now are refitted with RAM (and SeaRAM) missiles.

[@ismoilovibrohim2730]

How long it takes making like this video in blender? Graphics 4/5 ⭐ but you could do it better than this

[@Aitelly]

It Took us 1 week for Animation Rendering Compositing & editing but the B52 Plane took 1 Month Link Here kzbin.info/www/bejne/hYi8cneXrM-jaK8si=_mf93jmIcWkes6nv This took ua 1 Month to Animate

[@juryfilatov4520]

TU-22M is no nuke bomber. It's antyship rocket cruiser

[@cherrypoptart2001]

It can carry nuclear capable missiles

[@Aitelly]

Yes it is specifically made for that purpose during the Cold War.

[@igorb2908]

you will see ma' man

[@juryfilatov4520]

@@cherrypoptart2001 such a missile can be carried by any aircraft capable of lifting 3 tons of cargo,

[@onevablo1692]

@@juryfilatov4520 TU22 can carry KH15 which have a nuclear charge of up to 300 kilotons. And it can also carry Kinzhal with a tactical thermonuclear warhead from 5-50 kilotons. So it is rather universal and not purely a carrier of anti-ship missiles. In Syria, he generally only dropped bombs, not missiles. The only variant of anti-ship missiles it carries is the KH-22.

[@abirmahmud3809]

1st❤

[@Aitelly]

Thanks

[@user-ns4rm5ox6y]

Ini yg bisa mengatasi pembersih nik itu , haha haha , TU- 22 M Go go go

[@LicPacane]

The KN-47 does not fly like that, it is a ballistic missile, it flies in a parabola, especially since they are not used against dynamic objects such as a ship. There is the hypersonic 3M22 "Tsirkon" for hitting surface targets, although I am not sure whether aircraft are capable of carrying it.

[@user-ie3ks8cf4q]

Tsirkon is carried only by frigates "Admiral Gorshkov" class and by future cruisers "Leader" class. They are way too huge for aircrafts.