How the Lancet Destroyed 1 Archer and 2 Abrams Tanks

Things have taken a rough turn for Ukrainian forces. Recent reports suggest they might have lost a couple of their heavy hitters: at least 2 American-made Abrams tanks and 1 Swedish Archer artillery gun. While both losses undoubtedly deal a blow to Ukraine's military muscle, the burning Archer might leave a deeper, more lasting scar in the long run.
Why so? Before delving into the potential reasons behind this disparity, let's explore the events surrounding these losses. Though the exact details of the fight are still fuzzy, here's what we do know:
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv

[@Dirtdabber1972]

The Russian washing machines and shovels are kicking butt

[@jnishar]

they should be happy to have that. in Germany they only have broomsticks!

[@user-lc8pf2de4n]

Вы забыли упомянуть унитазы и ковры.. 😅

[@Levvv.tolstoy]

Is it Kuleba who is going to send the Armed Forces of Ukraine to the front with shovels? Is not it so?🙂

[@maga_mamedov777]

Well, yes, it can’t be any other way) Ukrainian Nazis can only compete with the civilian population, and at the front even NATO equipment cannot help them) No one even sponsors them anymore, because their fate is known))

[@shell-bosch]

@@user-lc8pf2de4n 👍👍👍👍🤣🤣🤣🤣🏆🏆

[@memyself6454]

Abrams went up against farmers but when it come up against a competent military😂😂

[@andreycham4797]

Russians laugh at those Ukrainian gold coins. First Abrams was taken out after just 20 minuts in action

[@AntonioRomero-te4cb]

What a piece of overpriced junk 😂

[@user-ny4wt3tn9x]

Yes, we laugh!!! 🤣🤣🤣

[@jnishar]

how fast did putin realize that his army sucked? :D

[@jnishar]

@@AntonioRomero-te4cb yeah its better with some cheap russian crap, right? :D

[@cosmincasuta486]

@@jnishar 1d10ts like you does not deserve an answer!

[@musdef15]

"Tip the scale in Russias favour" you guys are hilarious. Russia is man handling NATO in Ukraine 😂

[@KermitFrazierdotcom]

Wait a Second. What is NATO doing in a Ukraine, if I might ask? Sightseeing?

[@marksermo9110]

(Autonomous AI) drones and autonomous (AI) (cruise) missiles are the future. (MBT) tanks and fighter jets are relatively easy to destroy with these weapons.

[@user-cb9sp6xr7k]

And Nato hasn't sent any troops to Ukraine, only equipment. And if you call being stuck in a grinding attritional warfare for two years while making minimal gains is man handling, you should think again.

[@Rempai420]

NATO aren’t even fighting in Ukraine. Russia has struggled against retarded conscripts for two years. Literally gaining ground that was already “owned” by Russian groups in Ukraine. They wouldn’t like to fight nato, it won’t go well for them.

[@courage04]

@@KermitFrazierdotcom everything from providing equipment to training Ukranian soldiers.

[@torkilvold3855]

Nothing is immune to the shovels!

[@user-ew9ou5sz5d]

You have old information, as of today 7 Abrams tanks have already been destroyed, there is even video evidence

[@arinternationalsas]

This channel re-post old videos very often!!

[@user-ew9ou5sz5d]

@@arinternationalsas This is not just an old re-post, this is manipulation of information

[@JJORIS4199]

@@user-ew9ou5sz5dnah this is true

[@marksermo9110]

No problem at all. America still has hundreds of these tanks. The modern tank and fighter plane has become old-fashioned. (Autonomous AI) drones and autonomous (AI) (cruise) missiles are the future. (MBT) tanks and fighter jets are relatively easy to destroy with these weapons.

[@giorgiomoretto6392]

👍👍👍👍🇷🇺🇷🇺

[@user-br4qp4pw2o]

Love how everyone always says Ukrainians recovered the Abrams. Hell if they can take the 70ton tank back when under Drone attacks what made them lost the tank in the first place!

[@alestbest]

Russian Shovels

[@marksermo9110]

(Autonomous AI) drones and autonomous (AI) (cruise) missiles are the future. (MBT) tanks and fighter jets are relatively easy to destroy with these weapons.

[@basook6116]

Abrams tanks )M1A1 tanks aren't meant to be in Ukraine. its heavy, low heat dissipation, and known for heavy energy consumption

[@pietskiet42-_]

Only now it's taken a turn?...wonder what happened to the 400 thousand troops?😮😮😮

[@nipunchandrawansa9014]

Numbers taken out of thin air ?

[@TonyL-gw4qx]

500,000 dead how many wounded? 100’s of thousands an entire generation wiped out!

[@user-lc8pf2de4n]

А с кем тогда воюете? и каждый день плачете что мало поддержки, и если поддержки не будет всей Европе будет конец .. 😅

[@user-jk1px2lp11g]

Откуда ты берёшь эти цифры ? CNN Сообщает ? ))) С начала конфликта вошло около 200-т , потом ещё 300 000 , Если 400 000 погибших , кто же вас там уничтожает ?

[@jamescook7713]

Ukraine is DONE !!

[@cjsteadman6217]

For those that aren't paying attention and didn't know, the war has been tipped in Russia's favor since day one.

[@marksermo9110]

Putin are making the same unbelievable stupid mistakes as Hitler... NATO has a war budget at least 10 times the size of Russia's budget... New western (Autonomous AI) drones and autonomous (AI) (cruise) missiles are the future. (MBT) tanks and fighter jets are relatively easy to destroy with these weapons.

[@thestein3532]

True

[@marksermo9110]

And Hitler won the war... For those that aren't paying attention and didn't know, the war has was already lost for Russia when the United States / NAVO was involved. The NAVO has a military budget that is 11 times that of Russia.

[@seekorkucing69420]

​​@@marksermo9110ahh yes, comparing 31 countries of nato members military budget againts only russian military budget seems very balanced And also it's name was NATO not NAVO bozo

[@aidanmacdougall9250]

It's not the tanks that sweat it's US high command 😅

[@LouisXavier-ep9gh]

In any case they were rusty creaky tanks. Don't know if they were used in Afghanistan. Toward the end US forces stayed put in their bases in Afghanistan. Dared not venture out fir fear of IEDs

[@MS4RS]

Avdiivka and Donetsk are basically the same, Avdiivka being the suburb of Donetsk.

[@JohnnysCafe_]

They are not connected, there is open land between them, Avdevkaa is a large town on the outskirts of Donetsk, not a suburb.

[@MS4RS]

@@JohnnysCafe_ Roughly 32000 inhabitants in Avdiivka before SHF, mate. Administratively yes, you are absolutely right, it is a different town on the outskirts of Donetsk which had more than one million people living there before 2014, not sure how many now. But just like Makiivka to me it felt like it’s the same larger Donetsk when I was there like fifteen years ago.

[@Aaayhdjfyy]

@@MS4RSi think you are talking about the dynamic and social life of an city and it‘s outskirts while he means the legal standing of an city ( like banlieue cities like bagnolet or grigny around Paris or small cities around german Metropols like Freising/Erding around munich. )

[@wkgurr]

There was never a balance to tip. The odds were always stacked heavily against Ukraine. NO weapons system can change the stategic situation and any informed 10th grader could have seen that this was a losing battle for Ukraine from the very beginning.

[@Triggernlfrl]

Makes you wonder why NATO keep on fighting...

[@Desertfox8902]

Why didn't you mention the Patriot that was destroyed...this is the most important thing?

[@6.6.12]

6 Patriot System, 3 Nasam System, 4 IRIS T ,4 S 300 ,5 BukM ,6 Strela 10 .22 Februar-10 April.

[@Desertfox8902]

@@6.6.12 If it weren't for the Abrams videos, and they spread widely... he wouldn't publish them or comment on them... I'm not Ukrainian... or Russian... and as we say, "pottery breaks together"... but what is clearly visible is that Russia is victorious... true. Not fast enough...but they are moving forward steadily and the place they enter they do not exit

[@janisvaskevics93]

​@@Desertfox8902if you are so smart, answer - what's next? What will ruzzia do with the land full of people that hate it? Deport to syberia? Yeah, we know that occupants do that. The rest of the civilised world wants nothing with ruzzia anymore. Only scum like Iran and some african suburbs are friends with russia. Was that an objective of this invasion?

[@johan13135]

@@Desertfox8902 Moving forward steadily, as in fighting 3 years in a supposed 3 day war and losing 300k soldiers? Don't be foolish

[@Desertfox8902]

@@johan13135 According to what you said 3 years ago... Did the Ukrainians regain anything... No... Did the Ukrainians lose more territory? Yes... and the opposite is true for the Russians... and I acknowledge their poor performance at the beginning of the war... but there is a noticeable improvement. Among the Russians... and a noticeable decline among the Ukrainians... who is the fool now...

[@ediss821]

No one of MBT's can survive ini this war, and also, every MBT has capability to destroy each others. Who can see the enemy firstly, than she can destroyed them

[@desmond7914]

The Archer is great but how successful was it in the battle field, that's the real test.

[@user-br4qp4pw2o]

Against Flip-flops wearing Insurgents = perfect 10/10 Against Regular Modern Army = 1/10 if they can't work in whole units without getting destroyed back

[@marksermo9110]

NATO has a war budget at least 10 times the size of Russia's budget... New western (Autonomous AI) drones and autonomous (AI) (cruise) missiles are the future. (MBT) tanks and fighter jets are relatively easy to destroy with these weapons.

[@backpackpepelon3867]

Kinda ok. Nothing special compared to the older Soviet artillery, but for modern attrition style battlefield that favor quantity over quality, it didn't really worth the cost.

[@CarlChaitanya]

It makes me laugh when you ask if this will tip the scales .😅 Rússia has been in control of the war since day one .

[@mortenlund2883]

That's a joke to see that Been in control They have been in control of nothing Russia. Is a joke If they been in control of this war They would have been away further now

[@catherineharris4746]

Those sound effects of fried chicken you've added is funny as hell!😂😂😂😂😂👍

[@IOSALive]

Military TV, This is great! I liked it and subscribed!

[@kariukikiragu]

What happened to the other 25 “Game-changing” Abrams? We hardly hear of them…

[@iandemontfort4276]

Ukraine has lost! ❤

[@KermitFrazierdotcom]

Not quite yet... Give Z another few billion for pocket/getaway change plus some more disposable/recyclable tanks, patriot radars & batteries and throw some highly trained Special Forces in for Cannon/Drone Fodder. Seems like the plan is for another 5 years of this before exhaustion. This helps the Russian War Industry's Economy & Tech Advancement studies.

[@marksermo9110]

Putin are making the same unbelievable stupid mistakes as Hitler... NATO has a war budget at least 10 times the size of Russia's budget... New western (Autonomous AI) drones and autonomous (AI) (cruise) missiles are the future. (MBT) tanks and fighter jets are relatively easy to destroy with these weapons.

[@marksermo9110]

@@KermitFrazierdotcom Putin is 'replaced' within 1 year.

[@astorimarco2211]

OTAN has lost

[@waleedali9393]

No more money for Ukraine

[@deepseasearch]

Taxpayers have no money and no strength. Why do they need someone else’s war if their own countries have problems in the social sphere? Why support the crazy Zelensky, who turned the world upside down?

[@andredc9583]

Sweden should be very careful!!! Russia will never forget!!

[@user-jz1ft5jp5k]

А у них комплекс 😂

[@mumu8727]

@andredc9583 i think we (i am Swedish) are getting operssed by United states. (Just like Ukraine) Therefore are our politicians making strange decisions.

[@deepseasearch]

Yes. As a result, Sweden collapsed in the Russian-Swedish wars of the past. Russia will always be able to repeat its success if there is any aggression from the north...

[@user-lc8pf2de4n]

Швеция из нейтральной страны превратилась в страну на которую в 2024 нацелены ядерные ракеты (к сожалению) 😢

[@user-jz1ft5jp5k]

@@user-lc8pf2de4n у Швеции нет своих ядерных ракет

[@Bipolar_Bear7774]

Those washing machine chips sure working overclock.

[@harrycee656]

If losing 1 archer tils the war in Russia favor... The war is already loss.

[@philippegauthier4525]

they lost like 4-5 archer

[@hanshuber1875]

@@philippegauthier4525 oh this changes everything. Despite the fact that russia already lost 3000 tanks and nearly 10000 other heavy vehicles.

[@pashapasovski5860]

​@@hanshuber1875you read Ukrainska Pravda hahaha, 3000 tanks lost, just few weeks ago 13 SU34 in a week and that's not even mentioning Ghost of Kiev 😂

[@cosmincasuta486]

@@hanshuber1875 Dwmb0, let say I believ the propaganda figures (like they took down 120% from the missiles but their cities are in ruins), 3000 tanks???? Russia had 16000 active and God knows about the reserve!!!! Since one year now the russian produce 100 new tanks per month (according to british intelligence) and about 300 modernize tanks per month .... That means they have at least the same numbers on the front, you 1d10t!!!1

[@Eagleblazer69]

@@pashapasovski5860the ghost of Kiev is Ukrainian propaganda

[@juhasznagyjozsef]

The amount of copium is on an industrial scale in this comment section.

[@KermitFrazierdotcom]

The USA has a lock on over producing Cut Rate Copium, tho it loses effectiveness after 15 minutes, resulting in Massive Seethe and Dilation. (thank god no one is weaponizing aerosol Fentanyl)

[@magnificenttechnology9473]

Can lancet destroy merkava tank?

[@Aaronreacher]

Even RPG7 can potentially destroy a Merkava if it gets hit in a weak spot so a Lancet can most definitely destroy the Merkava. However drones wouldn't even be needed, the merkava was made to fight in an especific terrain, its weight would be his biggest problem in a place like Ukraine.

[@alestbest]

There is an ultra secret source of information called Google. If you search for pictures of "merkava destroyed" you will find many examples.

[@off6848]

Absolutely even though the Merkava has some of the strongest top side armor along with the t80BVM unless it has a cope cage FPVs will get through

[@sieferswe]

It also features active protection from incoming projectiles. Unsure how effective it is against drones and such.

[@LouisXavier-ep9gh]

Already several damaged by some peculiar RPGs used by Hamas

[@johnmetson7950]

What are like in mud

[@molambo]

Lancenet: Box office champion!💀💀

[@deepseasearch]

That's for sure!

[@superspies32]

Now that title is Fab-500 glide bomb. However, soon it will be transferred to Fab-3000 glide bomb.

[@DH-.]

F.J.B

[@KermitFrazierdotcom]

Francis Jeremiah Bullouppy

[@danishh3819]

Western media: we destroyed 1 million Russian soldiers and 1 million russian tank and jet We know the reality of battlefield 😅😅😅😅😅

[@user-zu5rd1ft8w]

운용의 문제. 아쳐가 무슨 105mm 포도 아니고 전선 근처에 들어가서 랜셋 맞아 파괴될 만큼 포병 작전이 엉망이란 소리임. M1A2도 운용 실패. 전차는 독립적 운용이 불가능한 무기체제임. 대전차 미사일, 드론 모두 다 주변에 보병으로 견제해줘야 전차가 생존이 가능한데, 전차 한대로 작전 시켜서 결국 그냥 얻어 맞고 전투 효과도 못 보고 사라지게 됨.

[@user-rn9vf7im6g]

The war in Ukraine entered a phase where the Abrams and the Archer became targets. And there will be no other scenario.

[@norizammastor9072]

Fighting Falcon was US iconic wsr machine. Please don't deploy it.

[@peterturner6497]

What scale and what tipping? It has always been like a fight between Mike Tyson and a four year old kid especially with the infantile nature of the Coke fiend from Kiev leading the fight on the losing side.

[@tlb84gaming5]

Funny the second one looks like a M1150 “ABV”. Not a main battle tank, but an anti mine vehicle with only two crew members and armed with a .50cal. Ukraine is also using them improperly. No tank is going to survive a direct hit. Armor would have to be 3ft thick. Thus it would be impossible to do. Now you could design a tank that has better crew survivability. There have been somewhere around 30 Abram’s in US service destroyed. So around 70 crewmen affected. Of those only 9 were KIA. Of those all came from only 4 tanks. 3 involved massive IED’s strong enough to remove the turret, and one dropped directly inside the turret. However in all 4 cases at least one crew member survived. Definitely not something eastern bloc tanks are known for.

[@reptiloid1644]

Танки восточного блока компромис между выживанием и весом машины. Для России стратегически важно иметь возможность перебрасывать эшелоны танков по ЖД путям, так и своим ходом через мосты и дороги, в том числе на пересечённой местности. Россия может делать тяжёлые и хорошо защищённые танки, но опыт прошлых войн дал понять, что такое решение не столь эффективно на практике при переброске войск на другие позиции. Те же нацистские танки чаще ломались и были вынуждены тратить много времени и ресурсов чтобы вернуть в строй тяжело бронированные тигры, которые просто застревали в грязи из-за своей массы

[@off6848]

Eastern bloc tanks are not known for survivability because of propaganda. The truth is that there are thousands more of them on the field and you only hear about the most sensational losses. Thats propaganda 101 and you fell for it. I can show you videos of t80bvm shrugging off multiple fpv drone hits though. For some reason they never showed that one to you in the western news cycle. Not good for business

[@anthonybatissa1417]

@@reptiloid1644Germans had big trouble Particularly with their King Tiger! In that loose Soil, better off with the APC's & IFV's then the MBT's the Bradley is much more effective then the Abrams.

[@johan13135]

Shuush, don't say that to the Russian trolls here. Their feelings may be hurt by real facts

[@off6848]

@@johan13135 what’s your thoughts on the real facts that so far Russian vs American t72 vs Abrams is 1-0 in favor of the t72

[@johanragnarsson9310]

I pray that this war will end and that all the innocent soldiers and civilians can go back to their loved ones. I think it's pathetic how people in the comments argue like this is a game. People are dying, show some goddamn respect!

[@user-xe1lx3og4n]

on the scale of the front, these archer units have no meaning. For artillery to make a significant contribution to combat operations, there must be a lot of it and its losses can be easily made up for by the country’s production capabilities. Therefore, Russia has a decisive advantage over Ukraine; it creates its own artillery in very large volumes. And if we take into account air superiority and the active use of bombs, Ukraine and NATO have no chance

[@1957Anwar]

Days of tanks and helicopters are over in modern warfare.

[@davidhoang6360]

Ha ha ha that was exactly Col Douglas MacGregor said the Abraham tank only good at the 90s but not for now aday it will not be any good for day today technology. It times to say goodbye to all Abraham tanks. RIP.

[@timbrown275]

ask your momma like i did ball licker!!!

[@deepseasearch]

It's right! He was good against soldiers with machine guns in Iraq. But against the Russian military machine, this is just a toy of American generals...

[@timbrown275]

@@deepseasearch so says the traitor scum!!

[@timbrown275]

more bonespur commandos!!!

[@jennyohara4011]

Go Russia!

[@johndyson4109]

Why is EVERYONE flipping out about an ABRAMS or 5 being knocked out! Look at how many Russian tanks have been knocked out! The ABRAMS is NOT invincible!

[@kbellanger4140]

What we already know with watching is that omg Ukraine lost a few tanks. No kidding?

[@arcldaleleitzfontanilla2502]

Its war you lose asset anytime. These videos are just propaganda. To boost morale and to satisfy the public's thirst for accomplishments

[@oakspines7171]

Looks like someone set fire to the Abram tank. Good thing is it stays in 1 piece though.

[@harkbelial]

This looks like something that you can make yourself in the garage.

[@grandvoyage816]

This happens when enemy can strike back and have not old weapons and only RPG7.

[@h3w45]

The mighty shovel

[@marksermo9110]

(Autonomous AI) drones and autonomous (AI) (cruise) missiles are the future. (MBT) tanks and fighter jets are relatively easy to destroy with these weapons.

[@anthonybatissa1417]

Heavy MBT'S are just not that effective in this war for either side! Their Thickest frontal armor gets completely bypassed by the Drones, it seems like the only legit way any MBT's can be useful in this war is just to sit on a Defensive line like Russia had during the "Counteroffensive" while having its sides & rear covered by AA

[@acaciolacita3671]

Shovels and washing machines are bad 😂😂😂😂

[@Lynnek8]

Military’s will have to innovate defence methods against drones & train recruits with skeet surfing, and once they graduate they can do it on the back of fast moving vehicles, and maybe fire some gladiators type tangle nets with balls

[@aberdeenkiko]

The Archer-FH77, is a mili-gear that actually can sting. Even though, it tends to be a bit of a loner, on the battlefield. Due to the canned cucumbers, type of armour and also longboat-sized frame; from those Maidan Ukranian Archer-FH77s; they tend to get to pay: a full recalling parking ticket; almost every time, the Russian mili-drone-operators, finish smoking, their mourning cigarette.

[@joem0088]

Losing 1 gun changes nothing.

[@isurumaddumage1922]

So, US tanks has similar flaws as Russian tanks. Earlier in battle they talk like US main battle tanks are far superior than Russian ones in armor but they turn out to be bluff.

[@user-ky3im3ms3h]

The real test is what happens at the battle field

[@giorgiomoretto6392]

Adesso sono arrivati a ""7"""Abrams destroyed😂😂

[@user-xg5vh2mc4n]

Арчер это переоцененная игрушка. Он два дня пострелял и требует замену ствола. Шквалом может и МСТА-С стрелять... какой в этом смысл?

[@michelwong1]

AIR SHOW : Helicopters Collided Mid Air 👍👍👍👍👍👍

[@hockingangler1334]

Watchingbthis after watching all the "here comes the abrams" hype shorts😂😂😂

[@user-nm1qn3ip5q]

هكذ العمل الصحيح

[@LIONIQ-foxhound]

the Russian could equipped the lancet suicide drone or any specialized suicide drones with the warhead of the 9m133 kornet ATGM or the with penetration upto 1300mm or the thermobaric warhead against all the sub heavy armor target's ranging from infantry soldiers, lightly armored vehicles, artillery and mlrs piece's, fuel and ammo's storage's....etc

[@off6848]

Kornets get their penetration from the velocity of being launched out of recoiless guns over mach 3 a lancet only moves at about 300kmph

[@LIONIQ-foxhound]

@@off6848 no my friend the 9m133 kornet is shape charges warhead which is a chemical explosive, so the speed or the ranges are irrelevant factors here, even the pg 7 rounds used onboard suicide FPV drone possess the same chemical explosive nature of the atgm warheads... I think the higher speed in the 9m133 compared to the older Soviet/Russian ATGMs systems is:1- to reduce the flying time and with it enhancing the conical no escape zone for the target's, 2-the maximum range is 5500 for e model which the missile should cover it in 22 sec which is important for the covering maximum distance in shorter time when negotiating mobile target's... 3-and maybe by employing the speed to give the guided projectile a better chance to defeat hard & soft kill systems...

[@gwen9140]

good thing about western tanks are the survivavility, experienced tanks crew from theses tanks can always drive another new one provided by the west, meanwhile russia on the other hand...

[@off6848]

Myth. Ukranian tankers of M1 have definitely been killed in some cases.

[@stepanbogomdan]

красавы наши!! как вам и говорилось - стоит только абрамсы вам поставить - для ВС РФ это будет просто приоритетная цель)))

[@egorka_fish]

да толку вообще что-то поставлять Украине, если техника натовская на передовой даже суток прожить не может... уже сколько Леопардов и Абрамсов уничтожили)

[@jimmyflores3759]

After re examine and evaluate those war machine. Then Russia will be the best military equipment manufacturer soon..

[@kakakiri2601]

im very sad for US Tax Payer

[@CLu-uw7uv]

I think you should feel sad for Urkrainian people and Russian people.

[@davidrickwood5588]

More than 140 countries support Ukraine including Switzerland

[@Hannes-qr3bz]

BS 🤣

[@joni8090]

Bravo Ruussiiaa 🇷🇺 💖 🇷🇺 UUURRRAA 🙏

[@user-ee6xt2ne9c]

What a beast 😂

[@AhmetALEMDAROGLU-qo7wp]

Leopard 2 strong

[@Mdaaa..NyuName]

ну ланцет в очередной раз показал, что он не зря является экспонатом, который наводит страх на всех инструкторов НАТО, ведь когда эту птичку видишь, ты понимаешь, что тебя одолевает страх...ведь она не промахивается, она не собирается отступать - она собирается лишь поразить тебя!

[@diavolo217]

Lancet the die of the sky !

[@basook6116]

France and Germany should help Ukraine more since they breach the Minsk according 2 deal. two countries sign the peace deal, to borrow time before NATO have proxy war against Russia

[@homelandfighters8541]

Alamak!!!Alamak!!!Alamak!!!

[@T90M-Proryv3]

Lancet ~3 mill. rub or 32-32.5k dollars. Abrams ~4.3-9 (full uran style xd) mill. dollars. For example - share second on first . USA sponsored what? For what?))

[@adventurehungry]

Once Russians run out of shovels they would send pitchforks

[@IndianYouThoober90]

Russian have a lot of options because they are not begging. They have shovel to vodka.

[@tigbuh1283]

"mean reputation" yeah from "mean" propaganda...

[@6.6.12]

Russia 23 Februar-10 Marz Desroyed 5 Patriot System,2 Nasam System. 10Marz-8 April Russia Zirkon 4 Rakete ang 4 X 69 Raketen 🚀 Desroyed Kiev 2 Patriot System, 1 Nasam System. Charkiv Russia Iskader Rakete Desroyed 1 IRIS T .3 S 300 P ,2 Buk M 1 ,5 Strela 10 .

[@BadRussian.]

the price of the abrams tank is more than 6 million dollars russian fpv drone 500 dollars!🤣🤣

[@robertoorsi5771]

Send others Archers because they all have been destroyed by russian shovels with wash machine chips.

[@fregatta9243]

this war is basically R&D Grounds for the russians lmaoo.. Ukraine has not yet seen any of the upgraded equipment (only got new tanks from the west)... The russians however.. got some upgrades resulting from this war... Russia really got the last laugh xddd

[@sivasami8428]

MASS RUSIA

[@user-te7qm1in8x]

Зря америка дает украине свое оружие. Плохая реклама получится из этого. Никто не захочет покупать ваше оружие после такой антирекламы

[@kiluagon2009]

.

[@phillipluwes9077]

Where the hell are the F16 jets?

[@Rempai420]

This is an absolute Russian propaganda video with loads of incorrect information. The thermal image video of the Abrams was destroyed by an ATGM not a drone, but you cut the video up to fit the narrative

[@bluefordpickup]

Drones are NOT robots.

[@user-us8wf7xm4v]

Русские лопаты и стиральные машинки с унитазами уничтожают хвалёный заподный металолом!

[@riadratol7074]

Abrams 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@NailAlex]

Чем больше сгорит западной военной техники в трусливых руках украинцев, тем проще будет российскому военному освобождать Европу от американских захватчиков. The more Western military equipment burns in the cowardly hands of the Ukrainians, the easier it will be for the Russian military to liberate Europe from the American invaders.

[@chrissanto2613]

Long live mother Russia 🇷🇺

[@castor071250]

Big n heavy US abrams are inefficient in this Ukraine war against Russia, been fired as german leopard 😂

[@user-lg4mg5du9p]

Sulva russian 🇷🇺✌️

[@timsilver777]

You can’t say it’s not in russias favor Why? Because Russia doesn’t have another option, This is existantial for Russia so if it takes half of their population to figure out how to beat nato weapons , they gonna be doing that. And nato knows it The only tragedy is for Ukraine to absorb

[@randyartesano785]

Anothers tank junkshop

[@professor_of_logic]

Archer can't fire 8 (or 9?) RPS...Especially not in combat conditions (maybe on ranges and in perfect circumstances). Try with 6 RPS, much closer to the truth... p.s. No matter what - Abrams is the best MBT in the World, for sure. Some losses are inevitable, but that's how it is!

[@off6848]

Koalitsya S heavy SPG can fire 15 rpm

[@oletoustrup8572]

MRSI is expensive to train and with a shortage of shells it is not an option for the Ukranians.

[@milan1646]

Archer is mounted on Volvo dumper

[@williamcharles9480]

It must be remembered that the armor on the Ukrainian Abrams is NOT the same as that of American Abrams tanks. The US didn't want the Russians getting anywhere near that armor.

[@SRB.4S]

They have the same armor, because they are tanks directly from the American army, that armor is integrated, it cannot be removed. They even gave the Ukrainians additional armor that can be retrofitted.

[@aidanmacdougall9250]

Slightly defeats the point of armour if you don't use because you dont want your enemy near it!!!! 😂😂😂

[@ThorsMjollnir0341]

This is an urban legend.

[@chrisdupreez6281]

I really think the Russians considered that, however if the USA gave Ukraine inferior weapons or not - Russia job in a war is to destroy it on the battlefield (In this case they did that). Hope that Ukrainian crew was happy with sitting inside a tank with inferior armour, hope you are happy with people risking their lives in inferior equipment. Is the USA dumping inferior equipment to Ukraine....? Why - that is risking lifes and making the training, the expense of operating the tanks, all the soldiers the tanks are suppose to support, the infrastructure adjustment, the technical personal trained to maintain the tank all a fruitless exercise. The USA Abrahams and British Challenger are both Chobham armour?.....That tech are 40+ years old - Composite armour was first fielded by the Soviets, Chobham is just a update on 1950's invention. Irrelevant of the successfull destruction of a tank - Im glad the blow out panels worked and hope the crew is safe.

[@pietskiet42-_]

How long is it going to take people to understand that the Russians aren't goat heardingsandal wearing farmers....make peace very quickly with Putin....we are gonna get burned! 😮😮😮

[@user-db7vx2lq1r]

Western tanks will need roads for movement in russian soil. And that is a big problem. First of all there are not many roads on such big terrotory + russian soil, especially on the western side is muddy, watery and stucks like glue. Spring, autumn, and winter will turn in to hell for an atacker in Russia. Nature is a big protector for mother.

[@martinvidenovic5767]

You have to understand one thing, and that is that the success of American military equipment, from invisible planes to these tanks, was against opponents with weapons that are several generations behind the American ones. When they came across weapons of the same generation in this war, that technique was not successful at all, it was intended for weaker opponents and advertising. Well, invisible planes were shot down over Serbia with anty aircraft systems from the 60s, imagine what modern Russian systems would do. Another problem is that everyone knows that Russian invisible fighters fly over Ukraine, but the radars don't register them, the Russians are really rude, so they make planes that NATO and America can't see.

[@hutrizal1713]

Ukrainian and nato vs rusia😂😅😂😅😂😅