Few holes here: Currently rental income is around $125k per year (assuming new Akld properties are purchased), you want them to go interest only so they will have around $1.8m of debt at say 6% p.a. bank interest rate, so $108k p.a interest alone. They would either need to aggressively pay P&I at some stage to repay the mortgage with in 20 years or sell an asset to clear the debt and therefore decrease future income. Hopefully they have already had their family as if they dropped to one income they would likely end up in serious trouble. P&I payments on $1.8m are just shy of $3k per week or $156k p.a. (at 6% over 20 years) so clients would need to top up the mortgage by $31k plus the usual rates insurance property manager fees so say another $30k which gives a total of $1,173 per week the clients would have to put into the investments. CASHFLOW is critical. Pretty sure you should be having a disclosure at the start of your presentations too.
@opes_partners2 жыл бұрын
Standard strategy in this model is to hold the properties over the long term, get the capital growth, then sell the properties, take the gains and invest in higher yielding properties with lower debt. The rental income then provides the passive income.
@jonathanussher91862 жыл бұрын
Hey Ed and Andrew, thanks for your content. Could you please delve deeper into how you calculate the passive income. For the golden goose approach are you factoring in capital growth as passive income so in a sense your assets are being whittled down? I would love to see if this sort of passive income can be achieved solely on cash flow of high yielding residential property and what sort of portfolio value and equity position is required to achieve it. Thanks
@opes_partners2 жыл бұрын
Hey Jonathan, it’s calculated just on rental income. Standard strategy is to aim for a 4% net yield. So for $100k of passive income, need $2.5 mil of assets without any mortgage on them. Then after paying for property management, rates, insurance etc. 4% drops out the bottom, which gets you the $100k.
@abdulzoheb7678 Жыл бұрын
Do you have to go on Interest Only? What about paying off debt over time?
@CheshireArt_2 жыл бұрын
THANK U SO MUCH!! selling a house to buy 2 new builds 🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯
@dianeharrison85772 жыл бұрын
You guys are Amazing! Thank you for sharing your knowledge.
@ritchiewalker61942 жыл бұрын
Great stuff again guy's! Thanks
@pa74002 жыл бұрын
Hi Ed and Andrew, great content! What would be the strategy for low income & high savings. To be more specific, 40k of annual income & 1.5mil of savings, no property.
@opes_partners2 жыл бұрын
Assuming you’re a bit older, the standard strategy would be to buy a high yield property without a mortgage (or a low mortgage). You’ll struggle to get a lot of lending from the bank because of your income. So the game plan would be to get a property that supplements your income (dual key apartment or townhouse). It wouldn’t use all your savings, so you’d retain some of them and invest in other assets that could provide income. Assuming you’re younger, you’d probably buy growth properties and use a second tier lender to get as much borrowing as possible. Would recommend you get some personalised advice on this to see what the right approach would actually be for you. Best next step is to book a complimentary portfolio planning session with our team. Here’s the link: opes partners.co.nz/property-coaching
@andreirobertson48442 жыл бұрын
Love the content guys, have been spamming your podcast for the last few months and looking forward to you visiting Invercargill soon - when is that happening?
@gloriasimon81027 ай бұрын
😂 👌
@modz822 жыл бұрын
Hi team is there a way we can get access (via sub?) to the My Wealth Plan software? I’ve already had a review with the team but would like to play around with scenarios. And perhaps an extra button for Andrew’s shirt ;)
@opes_partners2 жыл бұрын
Hey, today My Wealth Plan is just for our financial advisers. But, we are planning on making it available to the public when we launch our book later in the year.