I consider Tim Mosso watch royalty, so when I make my comment I don't do so to try and discount his opinion, instead I'm simply offering my own for example. That is in regards to manually wound watch movements, outside of some very exotic scenarios, the danger of overwinding a manual movement is little to none. With 99.99999% of manual movements there's a piece of steel that winds around a post in a barrel, when you turn the crown you wind that piece of steel tight, when it runs out of slack it is fully wrapped around the post. That's it. Outside of taking a pair of pliers to it and exerting unnatural amounts of torque, you're never going to overwind a manual movement. Just turn the crown with natural strength until it stops, then you're done. No fear. (source: decades of watch repair experience)
@the1916companywatchreviews7 ай бұрын
That's all fine and generally valid - nothing wrong with the observation. But I speak from experience, and I've seen mechanical failures. Sometimes the mainspring is the casualty, sometimes a person rams past the stopworks - which is a finger follower, not the spring around the arbor - of a fusee Lange, and sometimes the downstream train gets affected. And on vintage watches, well, I've seen a busted 6239 Paul Newman from aggressive winding. If in doubt, extra care and slower winding is a can't-lose precaution. Best, Tim
@GRAFHC7 ай бұрын
@@the1916companywatchreviews Well, like I said, outside of some "very exotic"... ie, a fusee Lange or a PN Daytona... just wind your watch. I'm sure you've serviced thousands of 17j Elgin or Bulova watches from the 30/40s with their original mainspring still in place. Surviving full winds daily for decades, tens of thousands of times. Nothing to worry about is my motto. But when you're wearing a 100K timepiece, then sure, be careful, not a bad idea there. The more opinions and points the better I think! Thanks for sharing Tim!
@the1916companywatchreviews7 ай бұрын
@@GRAFHC We've got a lot of those $100K timepieces, so I warn our clients first and foremost. De Bethune and certain high-flying Patek models (e.g., 5207) use an automatic-like slipping mainsprings to eliminate the low-probability winding accident on manuals. Best, Tim
@GRAFHC7 ай бұрын
@@the1916companywatchreviews Hello again Tim, I think it's really impressive you taking time to respond to comments such as mine, I should have mentioned that before, I really appreciate it. And, you know, you make a really good point here. I'm typing from the perspective of an "old timer" that's been in the watch business for decades and typically worked with pieces that might have $200 or $300 in value. The approach an owner should take when wearing a 1955 gold filled Lord Elgin is going to be a lot different than one wearing a limited run MB&F for instance, as it should be. From the perspective of a someone like you who often deals with the most prestigious brands and models ever made, it actually makes a great deal of sense to apply a foundation of awareness and precaution across the board. Not because all watches can't take abuse, but instead because some watches can't take abuse. Why muddy the waters trying to differentiate between those cases when you can just apply extra care towards every watch. So to that, I would say you've changed my mind on this. While I think from a technical perspective there's little concern, there's also no real reason to not be careful, and there's no reason to overcomplicate the process and risk losing your new timepiece for a year and a half while it's off for service. Again, I appreciate you and your time, it means a lot. Take care of yourself and be well!
@thlee37 ай бұрын
i hope he got watchbox equity
@CubanBBQ7 ай бұрын
Tim is a gem.
@dannysimenauer57457 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing your knowledge so we can avoid breaking our expensive watches. Great idea for a series and look forward to the next one!
@Rodisflawless7 ай бұрын
Looking forward to this series. Off to a good start!
@netanelostrov34257 ай бұрын
It whispers, but it doesn’t scream. Beautiful ❤️
@hanumarn78827 ай бұрын
The watch doesn’t scream, but the owner surely will if the whisper is not heard.🤣
@seannotaro4737 ай бұрын
Tim is a wealth of knowledge! Awesome content my man
@Stona9997 ай бұрын
Great content Tim. I just bought my first manual wide movement and learned something helpful today
@Nefville7 ай бұрын
One trick to prevent overwinding is to let your fingers slip when you're winding it. Don't have a locked grip, just enough to let it click.
@JamesCarian7 ай бұрын
Brilliant Tim! Always great to have some of the basic do's and dont's with various complications. Continuing to enjoy this series!
@RabbitWatchShop7 ай бұрын
Proud to say in all my years owning and mostly wearing dive watches, I never mistakenly left the crown unscrewed. Prior to cleaning, or getting into water, I always make sure the crown is screwed down, though; make it a ritual to check often.
@Nefville7 ай бұрын
This is great, its like a What Not to Do and Tim's SOTC all in one.
@timrodriguez13 ай бұрын
Great information, thank you for sharing. 🤘🤠
@greggraus63657 ай бұрын
Love this series. Can’t wait to see what is next.
@SVH897 ай бұрын
Great video Tim! Keep em comming!
@weareveinumb7187 ай бұрын
Man Tim…you are truly a wizard!! You’re the first person that I’ve seen leave a video about watch maintenance this detailed. Amazing work, extremely informative! I’ve been conveying to first time watch enthusiasts about “wrist awareness” I scratched my sapphire on another fellow’s sapphire on the walk by 😵💫. Costly lesson, lesson learned tho. I did…so you don’t have to 😂.
@nkmsvwde56127 ай бұрын
Wonderful video Tim, I look forward to your in depth pt 2 review of my Ball engineer II magneto S We love you
@GooseCrack7 ай бұрын
Beautiful script, very humorous video, great work 👍👍
@SaltBhj7 ай бұрын
Great feature, keep em coming.
@ryangochuico7 ай бұрын
Thanks for all the lessons. I love this series❤
@michaelh82757 ай бұрын
Short but long enough for a listen…. Like it
@saleendriver7 ай бұрын
As I have watches in my herd across all covered categories here, I found this video very helpful. Its now in my Favorites list. Thanks Tim!
@the1916companywatchreviews7 ай бұрын
My pleasure. Thanks for supporting the videos across both channels. Best, Tim
@amintaslneto7 ай бұрын
Great tips Tim! Love it!! Best, Amintas
@bluemystic75017 ай бұрын
Great video!
@nassmatic7 ай бұрын
First time seeing Tim's face! Cool
@dr.kevinmoore88897 ай бұрын
Great stuff! Can you over wind a spring drive watch?
@the1916companywatchreviews7 ай бұрын
As far as I know, you can if it's a manual wind example, but those are rare. Automatics cannot be overwound. Best, Tim
@johnher49467 ай бұрын
I'm a big fan of Andreas Strehler's approach to perpetual calendars of making the mechanism as close to indestructible as possible. Being able to set in both directions, no danger zone, etc. Ideally all new watch complications being designed should have a reasonable amount of idiot-proofing.
@mybrainlikesthings7 ай бұрын
The Mido Cal. 80 Big Date movement (ETA C07.651/ETA C07.651+) is curious in that the quick-set date function is safe outside of 22:00 to 02:00. That's only 4 hours (one-sixth of a day) where you can possibly break it. More common automatic movements will have a larger window, sometimes as much as 18:00 to 06:00, for example.
@kitabshah1937 ай бұрын
I understand this is general advice, not a technical deep dive. Having said that, for chronographs, I see no issue to run a chronograph for 12, 48, 72+ hours at a time. I imagine it is the overall cycles of the meshing lateral clutch wheel that causes wear, rather than a limited, continuous period. i.e. If you run the chronograph all year, there is unnecessary wear, if you run it for 120 hours a time (5 days), but it is stopped for the other 360 days of the year, I don't see an issue. And having said THAT, just enjoy your watch. Run the chrono if you wish. Service it when the time comes. Replace the gears that need replacing, and enjoy it for another 5-10 years. Put a third way, I don't think the overall duty cycle duration matters. I don't believe heat soak is an issue in mechanical watch gears. Though I'd love to see a movement with so much torque that could be a risk.
@austinjon317 ай бұрын
Noted. Will stick to Garmin, Casio, & Quartz 😅
@mybrainlikesthings7 ай бұрын
Legit
@joesteve32997 ай бұрын
So how do you tun the watch back one hour every autumn on a perpetual calendar?
@the1916companywatchreviews7 ай бұрын
Hacking seconds if you have it. Best, Tim
@joesteve32997 ай бұрын
Hi Tim Mine is the Omega Louis Brandt perpetual, second series from 1994 ish
@scottsolomon85377 ай бұрын
What about running a chronograph with a column wheel vs cam mechanism.
@the1916companywatchreviews7 ай бұрын
Makes no difference. It's the clutch type that bears on sustained-run durability. Best, Tim
@localheroEd7 ай бұрын
I sense the 1916 transition in the background music, same as Jacks vid.
@the1916companywatchreviews7 ай бұрын
Maybe, but sometimes we just update the style. Best, Tim
@mybrainlikesthings7 ай бұрын
Screw-down crown action is usually linked to the winding, so on a mechanical wind, don't wind until resistance, or you have nowhere to go when doing a screw-down; Automatics should be okay for the reason that you generally can't overwind them.
@pistonburner64487 ай бұрын
Ok, so if my dive watch starts letting in water -> dive deeper and deeper until it stops leaking!
@pistonburner64487 ай бұрын
So you're saying that a minute repeater watch can work like a Bond-watch, helping you escape from the bad guys by setting it up to explode?
@pistonburner64487 ай бұрын
Could we get a How-To for keeping your watch safe from enemy soldiers as a POW so as to be able to hand it down to your son as an heirloom?
@moneymikz7 ай бұрын
You think TM would do a better job than Christopher Walken??
@mollari22617 ай бұрын
"You took away 6 minutes of my life and I want them back." -- Hans Moleman
@lbco52297 ай бұрын
Note to self: don’t buy a minute-repeater.
@lonewolfemcquade81337 ай бұрын
I don't understand why someone would use that chronograph under water. Only a few chronographs can operate under water. Like the Tag Heuer Aquagraph
@vamosdaniel227 ай бұрын
Who else came for the nttd? 😢
@threethrushes7 ай бұрын
The voice of horology.
@markstanton637 ай бұрын
and don't drop it
@LD-bf1mi7 ай бұрын
Several serious inaccuracies. Take it from a watchmaker.
@mark_n_r7 ай бұрын
please explain
@the1916company7 ай бұрын
@@mark_n_r Crickets... Best, Tim
@ArneAsada697 ай бұрын
I was the 69th thumbs up.
@barfymann3627 ай бұрын
Thanks Tim, if one day I can afford all these watches - I'll make sure not to break them.