How To Build A Nuclear Facility In 1 BLUEPRINT - Satisfactory 1.0

[@TotalXclipse]

Download Star Trek Fleet Command for FREE now here: bit.ly/3OgGoGB to support my channel and enter the promo code CRUSHERS to unlock 2 FULL officer unlocks AND more for FREE. See how to claim CRUSHERS here: startrekfleetcommand.com/celebration/

[@WackoMcGoose]

Yes, definitely want to see the other two halves of it, both Spicy Green Goo recycling _and_ Spicy Blue Goo recycling!

[@TotalXclipse]

Spicy blue recycling won't be possible in a blueprint. As you can't fit the QE in it.

[@WackoMcGoose]

@@TotalXclipse Hmm, true. Apparently you can _diagonalize_ the encoder to make it fit, but then your entire blueprint will look funny...

[@TotalXclipse]

@@WackoMcGoose hmm might be able to do it then

[@thundergamergd]

​@@TotalXclipsewouldn't you have t3 blueprint designer by the time you have the quantum encoder.

[@TotalXclipse]

@@thundergamergd You wouldn't but the Quantum Encoder doesn't fit into it normally - though the suggestion of placing it diagonally might work

[@davehartt]

If it has not been said yet, I would suggest using a number / letter system for your blueprint mapping. 3B is easier than "column 3 row 2".

[@TotalXclipse]

That's fair and what I'd prefer to do - but we don't have access to letters in game other than P

[@Map1eTh0rnn]

@@TotalXclipse I know it's not ideal but you could do 1-5 and 6-0 or 0-4 and 5-9. That way you can say 49 instead of 44.

[@alecfiggins9251]

You have opened up my eyes to the true potential of blueprints... holy cow

[@msw10100]

Awesome, thanks! Super easy to follow, as always. And yes, please do a waste recycling video when you get a chance!

[@wmwho]

Your timing is amazing! I was just wondering if this was possible with the Mk 3 designer, and you went and did it on the Mk. 2. Thanks!

[@Spartacus13x]

Could further simplify this with the Iron Pipe alternate if you didn't want to mess with coal and steel.

[@NightHunterClaws]

Just set up the previous layout a week ago and the trains for it. Missed it by a week, but I will absolutely be building this one next time I play. Way more space efficient.

[@shoeless5678]

Definitely wanna see the waste processing!!

[@chasing_tail_rv]

Yes please, MORE !!! This was really good.

[@theiranianputin2770]

Very nicely done. Thanks Total

[@vashlex]

Ficsit approves playing Fleet Command during your (one and only) 5 minute toilet break.

[@Outer_GMD]

hi i like and enjoy satisfactory

[@Reuben-ny3]

That's a beautiful factory.

[@tasoth]

That's pretty cool

[@Rogerfoulger]

so can't work this out for some reason if I produce one uranium rod per minute how many nuclear power plants will that support?

[@MrVamp221]

Would love to see the waste side as well if you could please. :-)

[@michaelwesten4624]

this is so much more confusing when you cant see the little input and output icons like in factorio. it hurts my brains more

[@Aretinvondragenfels]

I would love to see a recycler build, please

[@Dirge0fTennis]

I would like to see the waste process too.

[@i-am-otter5454]

How many of what buildings are we going to need if we sink everything to deal with the 500 units of Nuclear Waste per minute from 10 Power Plants?

[@i-am-otter5454]

I miscalculated, it's 50 waste per rod, but it takes 5 minutes per rod. So it's 10 waste per minute x 10 equaling 100 waster per minute. They're just going to come 500 at a time (total) every 5 minutes. One plant can supply two particle accelerators for the plutonium pellets, but a blender requiring 37.5 uranium waster per minute is giving me a headache for napkin math. (One check of the calculator later). OKAY! Eight Blenders will use 300 uranium waster per minute and produce 400 non-fissile uranium per minute. That can supply four particle accelerators with enough non-fissile uranium to run. Problem is, 200 waste leftover is enough to run eight particle accelerators...

[@dannytolley3778]

This is not the epidosde 4 you're looking for ;)

[@dannytolley3778]

p.s. Amazing work buddy, as always, keep it up!

[@TotalXclipse]

🤣🤣🤣 is this the guided playthrough or the leys play?

[@dannytolley3778]

@@TotalXclipse haha, the guided :'(

[@PJgearhead]

Just built it in blueprint designer. Gonna supply it purely with drones, cos why not.

[@Bananus069]

Process the goo!

[@araniusprod]

can do with iron instead of stell (??)

[@TotalXclipse]

What do you mean?

[@Euphorya]

@@TotalXclipse Maybe they meant subbing Iron Pipe or something to remove the steel requirement.

[@brycey2364]

Iron pipe is fairly easy to swap in. Great idea

[@i-am-otter5454]

@@brycey2364 Can confirm that works. Just be sure to adjust the Pipe Output to the 15 and 18 needed. You'll require 132 Iron Ingots per minute.

[@brycey2364]

​@@i-am-otter5454yeah, it's also easier to just belt the pipe under the floor. The walls offer so much space for massive windows, so I made extra cat walks all around. This is going to be great!

[@justingaetano5620]

I’m struggling with the load balancing on 10 Power Plants. Anyone got tips on the correct way to do that?

[@TotalXclipse]

Split a line in two. Then split each line into three, then split those 6 lines into two lines each. That should give you a 1/12 split. From there, merge two of the output lines back to the start of the balancer. That will be a 10 line balancer

[@justingaetano5620]

Thank you!

[@justingaetano5620]

Also, thanks for this blueprint! It was great and got my Nuclear Power Plant up super fast! Great video, great explanation! Looking forward to the recycling follow-up!

[@brycey2364]

Impressive, very nice. Let's see the nuclear waste management of 500/ min.

[@i-am-otter5454]

It's actually only 100 per minute, but it comes 500 at a time every five minutes. I tried some napkin math with regular recipes to figure it out and got that you can blend 300 of that 500 in one minute with eight blenders, but that still leaves an extra 200 to deal with. My brain is struggling because I keep getting the rates all wrong. Gonna see if the alternate recipes make the math simpler.

[@i-am-otter5454]

In theory, 4 blenders using Fertile Uranium will use all 100 waste per minute. That means 400 non-fissile uranium per minute. I don't really like the calc for Instant Plutonium cells (they need 150 non-fissile per minute), so instead, we drop two blenders so we produce 200 non-fissile per minute and still have 50 waste per minute. That is enough to power one particle accelerator at 200% (or two of them at normal speed, whichever is more efficient) to produce plutonium pellets. That produces 60 plutonium pellets per minute, which can be dealt with by 6 assemblers using 120 concrete split among them into plutonium fuel rods.

[@brycey2364]

You are so right. I was doing math afterwards and really embarrassed I messed that up. I hoped I hadn't actually said 500 in my comment, but whoops! 100 isn't so bad, especially when spread between 10 nukes.

[@i-am-otter5454]

@@brycey2364 I made the same mistake in my first reply, but it was also bedtime and I was fishing for someone to do the math for me on how to handle the waste anyway. XD

[@xenodestroyer4803]

25 GW of power from a brick like that... i'm sure you can make more Uranium Fuel rods than that in a similar space.

[@madmadz1624]

isnt it better not to have foundations on the bottom since then you cant snap it to the world grid as easily?

[@ecogent]

oops, alternate recipes!

[@brycey2364]

12:00 are you freaking kidding me? Pause, take a breath, show a map.

[@BMann-jk2sv]

Well, after 2 hours for trying to follow your instructions, I gave up, u go SO fast to where and how to hook up belts is HARD to follow. Can't tell where you are 1/2 the time. A for Idea, E for Execution.

[@gordon861]

Yes, it's almost as if he has left out about half the video.

[@kyledunfee8763]

Set playback speed to .25

[@Airsy009]

WAY too many prerequisites to be taken seriously

[@kasuha]

You use a bit too many "per minute". I mean, feeding 10 power plants should go on forever, it would be pretty useless if they only ran for a minute. Also, you don't spend 1 GW per minute, if anything you spend one Gigawattminute per minute but it's unnecessary to say it that way :)

[@THUNDERBOLT-rv7fs]

why dont u provide a blueprint

[@Rocky-or4rz]

It is on his patreon

[@TotalXclipse]

Because I show you how to build the blueprint 🙂

[@craig226]

I'm going to be honest... this is an awful tutorial. So many steps are skipped and I wish more things were specified. I was often guessing where things would go based off a single frame, which could definitely cause problems. Like in one part out of nowhere some stackable conveyor poles appeared with some lifts that were never in the video.

[@AlexHaan]

"Produces enough to run 10 nuclear plants per minute". Wait, what? I think you need to re-record that or add an explanation. You either produce enough to run 10 plants, or not. The 'per minute' doesn't add anything.

[@TotalXclipse]

That's fair - 10 nuclear plants or 2 rods per minute

[@LemurLord]

Mentioning a blueprint in the title only for it to be paywalled behind your patreon is a liiittle scummy. I get it's all part of the content creator pipeline game, but really?

[@john_in_phoenix]

I'm still watching, but all prior videos he has shown how to create the blueprint. I appreciate that since I have plenty of time, but no money.

[@Thurold]

I'm fine with it if he shows how to do it in the video.

[@Pikawarps]

The video is a guide on how to make it, it’s not scummy because if you aren’t lazy you have the EXACT plans on making your own. Just because you want the convenience of already having it doesn’t make it scummy

[@xenodestroyer4803]

If you really tinkered and engineered enough you could make a better design and optimize things, this is just one of MANY ways people automate things with single click buildings.

[@AceOfSpadez79]

@@xenodestroyer4803 Exactly. You could be producing some of it elsewhere in some mega factories, and only have the bare essentials in this one click box. Blindly following what one person does is not the point of the game. Personally I admire these tight and boxed in builds but I personally like a more open and flat layout.

[@peterweller7618]

Nice video. Horrible audio.

[@TotalXclipse]

What are you listening on? I presume speakers? Let me know the brand/item and I'll get some and try it out because audio's fine on my side

[@yackgobus9060]

​@@TotalXclipseYour audio is fine bud