Step-by-Step intro problem to designing a steel column by a professional engineer. In this example we use a rectangular HSS member as our column and the AISC manual to get things designed. Enjoy!
Пікірлер: 28
@nabindahal80434 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Kestava. I appreciate it. Great example.
@WG-ft6tz3 ай бұрын
Thank you for the video. I find it confusing that table B4.1a has a column for width to thickness ratio instead of lambda. I shape property tables list b/2tf for compaction criteria, not to be confused with b/t for table B4.1. Both B4.1 and the properties table manage to avoid using the bass lambda symbol, at least in the 13th addition.
@chris121593 жыл бұрын
Best channel for PE exam prep, than you Kestava, Just some small questions. 1. At 19:06 , b minus 3t you said their is description for that in the book. Can you help me point out where is it? 2. Also I'm on 15th edition, does the book take out Q for the slenderness member instead if use the same Fcr for FB to LB only manipulate be...is my understanding correct? thank you
@syriandamascene6783 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir
@Kestava_Engineering3 жыл бұрын
Syrian you're absolutely welcome!
@filipimarcondes99863 жыл бұрын
Thanksss
@structureclass28294 жыл бұрын
Enjoy your videos, hope you keep it up! They're very practical and design-oriented which is nice. Suggestion: Could you do a video on either sheet pile wall design or design of deep pile foundation?
@Kestava_Engineering4 жыл бұрын
I just designed a tunnel with sheet pile walls, and another project with deep pile foundations! coming right up
@structureclass28294 жыл бұрын
@@Kestava_Engineering Awesome looking forward to them!
@Fuzzlecakes13 жыл бұрын
Hi Kestava, REALLY glad that I stumbled on your channel. Think you can make a video example for 1. design of a steel tension member and 2. designing a member with multiple segments, all having varying moments and axial loading (some with tension, some with compression)? Great work again, much appreciated!
@Kestava_Engineering3 жыл бұрын
oh baby Fuzzlecakes I like the sound of your suggestions! consider them added to the list!
@Fuzzlecakes13 жыл бұрын
@@Kestava_Engineering design criteria would be the member would be one continuous member, as opposed to optimizing each segment. Thanks again!
@ma93- Жыл бұрын
Great video as always. however, if you used table 4-22, you would get the same compression strength of the member in a few minutes.
@Kestava_Engineering Жыл бұрын
Great point!
@MohammedHosni-zz2tr3 ай бұрын
the section is RHS not SHS, Thank you for your lecture
@Kestava_Engineering3 ай бұрын
not sure i follow? are you talking about the HSS member?
@nabindahal80434 жыл бұрын
If we have a Z- cross section column having x, y, and z axis, could you please let me know if it buckles or not if it does than about which axis does this buckle about?
@Kestava_Engineering4 жыл бұрын
Hi again Nabin - send me a cross section of your member via the email i have linked on my channel and ill see what i can do!
@michaelmolter61803 жыл бұрын
Is that A36? Haven't seen 46 ksi steel yet. Or does HSS just have a different designation, something like A500/1.
@structureclass28294 жыл бұрын
One nitpicky point of constructive criticism, you say at 9:15 "the Fy is 46 ksi because the section is rectangular". This would be a good opportunity to explicitly reference Table 2.4 which says 46 ksi is the preferred material specification. Also other assumptions behind the tables with Design Values for K: In addition to perfectly plumb column, the column has no residual stress (All rolled sections have some level of residual stress) and the load is applied exactly over the centroid of column.
@Kestava_Engineering4 жыл бұрын
Logan, Such great points! I talk about KSI values in my steel manual tips and tricks but should have referenced back! for residual stresses in steel ive learned that the AISC accounts for this when stating what steel grade we can assume for our section. Ive also heard phi / omega take this into account.
@structureclass28294 жыл бұрын
@@Kestava_Engineering I looked back at it and you're right. Apparently the main difference for the theoretical and design Effective Length Factors is that the end conditions are never as idealized (can never or very rarely have a perfectly fixed or pinned condition). Always good to get the refresher! thanks for the good catch.
@josemontemayor7742 Жыл бұрын
Which version of the manual are you using? Thanks for your videos
@Kestava_Engineering Жыл бұрын
14th edition - the red one
@MARV3L3DGAM3R3 жыл бұрын
Can anyone locate the Q information in AISC 15? or does AISC 15 have all this compressed down?
@harigovind2968 Жыл бұрын
can you make a video on design of inclined columns particularly when a canti lever beam is extended from its free end