Very Brilliant presentation, every minute of it was so helpful.
@milesbetrov6 жыл бұрын
Amazing presentation. It really shows how much work goes into publishing a paper
@isaacboateng80413 жыл бұрын
This presentation is awesome. It is almost 5 years down the line and it's still relevant now. Thanks to the EASO and the presenter for such an amazing presentation. I'm going to publish a lot of high impact factor papers with this information at my disposal
@zayedzeadat11073 жыл бұрын
Absolutely amazing ... Many thanks, Dr
@thandiwemaretlane11014 жыл бұрын
Clear and very detailed. Thank you for the advice on writing a title and outlining that it should be nice and short avoiding prepositions or unnecessary words
@dr.shafiqulislam28446 жыл бұрын
It is really indepth and usefull. superv presentation style, good outlooking, clear voice and accent. I find this presentation very usefull for my publication
@NansinguzaJacob6 жыл бұрын
This presentation is very resourceful, insightful and comprehensive enough for 'one' to confidently approach publishing. It is tough to admit but it has demystified the process in a manner far more articulately than the lectures I attended during my studies. Thank you Dr. Clare Llewellyn, You are a great inspiration.
@hnrwagner4 жыл бұрын
Dear Jacob, here is a video which shows how a author can analyze how their work is cited: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qGGno5uYlNilabs in addition here is another video discussing the most important part of a publication: kzbin.info/www/bejne/a56cY3t7ot6Nl5Y
@muhammadasgharhassan26215 жыл бұрын
Very Brilliant presentation, Thanks for a detail information
@joecrozier32363 жыл бұрын
An extremely helpful presentation. Thank you. On correct writing. In my own field (electrical power delivery), if I find a single mistake, I stop reading. Forty years of experience have taught me that the ability to write is correlated with the ability to think. Though not perfect, the correlation is strong enough to have been a useful guide in my efforts to make my work as beneficial as possible.
@nibsresearchwriteup17883 жыл бұрын
Dear Clare Llewellyn, Thanks for awesome talk
@miscellaneous95854 жыл бұрын
Stunning, Love it. Many Thanks
@TrideFujimart11 ай бұрын
Interesting. It is really indepth and usefull. superv presentation style, good outlooking, clear voice and accent. I find this presentation very usefull for my publication.👍
@seanmnuanes4 жыл бұрын
An awesome teaching!
@dominicamuzu18073 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much for information... Very useful and educative...
@ScientificWritingwithKarenLMcK5 жыл бұрын
Excellent presentation that makes an important point about knowing all the factors that determine whether a paper is accepted or rejected. If you don't know or understand the criteria by which your manuscript will be judged, your chances of success are greatly diminished. It's especially important for early career researchers to know these criteria and actively address them when writing their papers for publication.
@libyaonly.10215 жыл бұрын
Can help me how t get more informatiom in publication and soo..on
@masihullahhasanyar10843 жыл бұрын
thank you so much. I just changed my article title and abstract after watching what you proposed it to be. but I dont agree on inviting a native co author and having no typo, this is sort of insulting to non-native speakers. Humans make mistake and our knowledge of English language and its vocabulary is not always perfect and stable. We forget certains things and learn new ones as life goes by depending on how much we are interacting in a particular language. THE MOST DECISIVE criteria shall be the results and findings of a research.
@siddharthrawat72052 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing this and making this public.
@drzafarullah762 жыл бұрын
Highly informative lecture.
@ahmedafb6 жыл бұрын
Excellent
@mrfrank55604 жыл бұрын
"if there is even some typo in the paper, I would reject it straight away." I agree it should not be horribly written, but I think it is some biasness for researchers whose first language is not English. It makes lots of difference how you express it, which should not happen for technical research. After all, are you going to read/expect an English literature essay/Novel or a scientific research paper with data and findings? I think editor with that mentality is making it a lot difficult for especially researchers and universities from Asia, Africa, South America. The language was supposed to be just a medium of expression. But has not been so as speaker divulged(she must be an editor in some journal as well) and many good papers rejected just because of reviewer not liking the language or command on "English" language. I don't know how it is not racism or biases in terms of language? Language overweighting the facts. Sadly, which has been widespread in the field of "academic" intellectuals as well.
@vahanprasan4 жыл бұрын
Mr Frank I agree with you. One of my friend who is specialised in linguistics was mentioning that any ENGLISH is ok as per past research in social sciences and humanities. It's only in recent times that every journal is looking for polished way and are rejecting for typo errors. Luckily my reviewers have been kind enough to point those mistakes as happens due to oversight, and my editor suggested to change certain things in low tone. I know everybody won't be like that.. So, nowadays it's more of cosmetic stuff rather than natural... So with journals and publications...
@g08012153 жыл бұрын
Has she never heard of proof edits?
@ShadowzKiller3 жыл бұрын
Very true. I'm not sure if it's coincidence or not, but such standards seem to be imposed by monolingual institutions or individuals.
@DerJayger2 жыл бұрын
Agreed. It's even more: It's dismissing a paper that might be really good in aspects that matter. A really weird weighting of criteria.
@divyanshisrivastava24532 жыл бұрын
Exactly. It's so weird that you'd dismiss something because it doesn't fit your standards of language.
@batoolhijjawi31146 жыл бұрын
Such a Wow Presentation
@libyaonly.10215 жыл бұрын
Hi ,do you study construction management ,i want sme help please
@cocochang50655 жыл бұрын
I published one article in Journal of American Academic Research in California, USA and I want to publish my dissertation as a book next year. After these 2 steps, I will consider most highly-impacted journal to publish such as Nature, Springer, Science, etc.
@merdekaagussaputra15045 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your recoms :)
@cocochang50655 жыл бұрын
@@merdekaagussaputra1504 You're very welcome.
@molly64045 жыл бұрын
Good comment, can't agree more
@liuxwinter19845 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing your experience, Coco. I have a plan to publish too.
@englishplusacademy92112 жыл бұрын
Nice class
@smasoudshe54023 жыл бұрын
This is all great but for a great chance of publishing a manuscript you need a combination of good writing and scientific revision. There are good companies like manuscriptbuilder, editage, etc which can do this. I guess it is all depends how fast and higher impact you want to go.
@VladyslavKL3 жыл бұрын
🕊
@fernandocortes11872 жыл бұрын
21:00 El título es crucial para saber cuanto exito tendra el trabajo
@polielie6 жыл бұрын
I find it quite funny that she gives the impact factors of the journals to the third decimal :) Nice talk though.
@chauzaku31496 жыл бұрын
polielie vd 2
@fernandocortes11872 жыл бұрын
11:00 Site for all the metrics 11:30
@fernandocortes11872 жыл бұрын
13:40 Top 100 papers 14:53 Estudíos de biotecnólogía han dominado los 100 mas citados
@jcropcho3 жыл бұрын
What is "Gemini" (sp?) to which the presenter refers at 19:38 ?
@SudarshanPant3 жыл бұрын
She must be referring to Gemini Study. Her profile says she is the Director of the Gemini Study, a large population-based British birth cohort of twins set up to study genetic and environmental influences on early life growth.
@fernandocortes11872 жыл бұрын
27:00 Outline
@fernandocortes11872 жыл бұрын
2:50 index
@fernandocortes11872 жыл бұрын
8:00 Journsls list
@fernandocortes11872 жыл бұрын
17:30 Novelty is crucial
@christopherellis26636 жыл бұрын
Impact is damage, you want effect. English is a language, not a game. ☆ What happens if one simply has something novel to offer for assessment? After eight years, nothing.
@balamstudios5 жыл бұрын
I would cite from a comment in reddit as long it was relevant.
@rainsunbow86682 жыл бұрын
I see a little bit of racism here regarding the absolutely no typos in the initial manuscript submitted to the journal. Not everyone's first language is English and Racism is not just the matter of inequality between black and white people, it happens in many forms and this is I believe one of them
@amarilloatacama49974 жыл бұрын
If you address the cover letter to the editor-in-chief you are very likely to get it wrong. It almost never gets to her/him, at least at the beginning. I don't think it's that bad though.
@g08012153 жыл бұрын
Doesn’t matter.
@amarilloatacama49973 жыл бұрын
@@g0801215 I agree. Thank you for the feedback.
@moxopal56813 жыл бұрын
OH MY GOD! She feeds abstracts to dogs!
@belowasmelashgebremariam2 жыл бұрын
Ewe Anne Asmelash Eye kemey ke
@mychannel-lp9iq11 ай бұрын
Nope the world hasnt changed my friend
@ocayaro2 жыл бұрын
Great talk, but you were lousy at listening and answering questions at end of the talk.
@27364928213 жыл бұрын
it is informative to some extent but the speed of the speech made it a little unbearable to hear