How to Kill A Rolex Submariner | Jenni Elle

Is the Omega Seamaster Diver 300m killing the Rolex Submariner? In this video I am going to give the Omega Seamaster some well deserved screen time and together we see, what the Rolex-Killer talk is all about!
Link to the Omega Login to check the stats on you Omega watch:
www.omegawatch...
Watch my Top 3 Nomos watches video to get some dress watch inspo ;-D: bit.ly/2IaKM7M
Omega Seamaster Diver 300m
The current seamaster comes with an increased size, making this one measure 42mm in diameter, with a lug to lug of 49mm and a height of 13,5mm, therefore making it bigger than previous models.
The entire case is made from stainless steel and alternates between a polished or brushed finishing on its surface.
The matte black rubber strap is very durable and - to my surprise - does not show scratches as quickly as I thought it would. The strap itself closes with a regular pin buckle which works just fine.
On the right side of the case sits the crown tightly in-between the crownguards which adds to the 300m water resistance of the case. Right above 10 o clock we also have a helium escape valve, which has been slightly improved and is now only usable when being underwater.
The bezel on this Seamaster 300m has the same ceramic inlay as its previous models but this time the Markers on the bezel are no longer engraved but enameled, making the bezel not only look super glossy but also feel almost completely even.
The dial is made from Zirconium Dioxide making it look very shiny, almost mirror like with some laser engraved waves that honor the design of the very first Seamaster.
The hour markers are perfect circles and sticks, each filled with bright white superluminova, framed by a thin black border
The hands are also similar to the hands on the previous models but, they are also skeletonized with superlumionva applied to it but the they have a way more intense acute angle towards to middle. The hour markers light up in an ice bon bon blue while the hands and the little pearl on the bezel glow in a bright green, making this watch super easy to read in the dark.
The date that has been placed at 6 instead of 3 o clock like we had on the previous models.
Built in is the omega in-house calibre 8800 which is METAS as well as COSC certified.
Thank you for watching, I hope you enjoyed my review of the Seamaster Diver 300m!
Jenni

[@TheSandipDev]

When you said "THISS is the omega seamaster. Today I am going to review it...". My brain automatically filled the rest "..and give it a Doug score"

[@kingtut2650]

Lol

[@ldavidtw2000]

i understood that reference

[@zixym]

hahahhaahhahahahaaa yeah dude

[@pawisangtulisan1248]

What about the "quirks and features"? haha

[@dougdawson7375]

I'm not telling you shit.

[@lee33htzdiscotech]

Omega Seamaster for me all day long. Outstanding engineering at an excellent price point. Plus no ridiculous waiting lists. Thank you jenni for the great review.

[@omgwtfpwnd]

Omega is overpriced. I know watches that function better and still look timeless. Also, the helium escape valve is ugly!

[@thegraciefighter102]

@@omgwtfpwnd an ugly wart indeed

[@ticktology]

@@omgwtfpwnd Omega isn’t the one that is overpriced…Rolex is. Omega has better technology in their watches with the METAS certification and is essentially amagnetic. You could buy a Planet Ocean (or Speedmaster) AND SMP 300m for the price of a Submariner. In addition, their warranty and customer service is highly rated. I own a GMT “Batman” and it took almost 9 months to buy. Try buying one on the grey market…it’s almost double the retail price.

[@thaivang36]

I don't know why so many KZbinrs love omega so much. 2 years later people still want Rolex over it

[@Birdylockso]

Water got into my first Omega Seamaster, not once, but twice! The culprit? The seal inside, I was told. Sold it and got Rolex Sub and then the Grand Seiko Diver SBGA031, and never looked back. Between the last two, hands down the Grand Seiko.

[@Anonymous-pm7jf]

I own this and I love it. But let's be real here guys. Watches are personal. What you like may not suit me and vice versa. Get a watch that YOU enjoy regardless of brand, style, or cost. There are a lot of wonderful watches out there.

[@AlwaysBolttheBird]

Totally right except for one point. Even if you want a Sub you shouldn't buy one at least in my eyes. The main reason is you shouldn't support bad behavior. The fact they don't make enough and you have to either wait at least a year or pay way too much money. I really want a Rolex but until they actually care about customers I will never buy one.

[@pinkomega4106]

Always Bolt the Bird Well said

[@matthewrusso1350]

@@AlwaysBolttheBird I get what you're saying, as someone that's been waiting forever for a GMT-Master II Batgirl, I truly feel your pain. However, the reason Rolex watches hold their value so much better than other brands of similar quality and build (Omega, Breitling, etc.) is the limited supply. So although their methods hurt people looking to buy a Rolex, for those that already have one, their methods help them retain the value. So, I fully get what you're saying... but if I buy anything but what I want, I'm just going to want the Rolex again in 6 months to a year.

[@AlwaysBolttheBird]

2Crassus Crassus have you ever tried to “wait” for a Rolex? In order to even get on a list you usually have to have bought from the jeweler before they will even let you on the list (I know that’s the keeper and not Rolex but just another hurdle to buy a watch) and then you wait three years for something that is just a watch. There is nothing so special about a Rolex that they can’t make more of them. If you think that Rolex doesn’t make more because they care then you are delusional. They make way less to make them seem more special than they are. If they made more and you could just go and buy one people would realize they are no more special than any other watch.

[@AlwaysBolttheBird]

Matthew Russo so basically what you are saying is Rolex is gate keeping. If you already have one great if not we don’t care. I would argue that you shouldn’t buy a watch as an investment. It’s actually a pretty bad investment. You should buy a watch because you want one and want to even pass it down. I would also argue that Rolex watches don’t actually hold value but are so artificially inflated that are just more expensive because you can’t get one.

[@ticktology]

I bought a black SMP 300m last summer to commemorate one year with the company I work for, after changing my life completely around 180 degrees. It’s such a beautiful watch and when I look at it, I get so immersed in its beauty that I forget to look at the actual time 🤣. This watch has sentimental value to me and I will NEVER get rid of it! It’s literally the perfect watch for me.

[@tiagomd]

How does it feel now, 2 years later?

[@remuswheeler2264]

The last time Rolex invented something new, I fell of my dinosaur.

[@RB-xv4si]

Off?

[@honoratopalma203]

🤣

[@g.l.81]

Caliber 9001 ? Coming from an omega fanboy btw

[@RH-vd3yu]

@Madden Emmett how bout both of you shut the fuck up?

[@fullnameontheinternet3384]

for the most part true, I'll give them credit for the Sky dweller movement in 2012 that one is pretty cool

[@u.u.upatreonrequests8679]

It's only natural to do the Moonwatch and Aqua Terra 41mm next.

[@DudeDadEsq]

or a Planet Ocean! I have the Aqua Terra GMT, Planet Ocean, and the new Seamaster ceramic! A speedy is next on my list

[@AlwaysBolttheBird]

I would love an Aqua Terra at 41 not too sure about the Moonwatch

[@TyBotHeApOcAlYpTiC1]

Beautiful watch and no wait. Walked into a local authorized dealer and walked out with the black dial version 30 minutes later...

[@allenhaines317]

I just bought a brand new Seamaster 300M (in blue with a rubber strap) last week! I was shopping for a Breitling Superocean Heritage II, and the AD had her Omega case right next to the Breitlings. I looked over and saw the Seamaster. I put it on and was unexpectedly blown away! I bought it on the spot and absolutely LOVE it. I should say I already have 2 Rolexes (a 1984 GMT Master II "Sophia Loren" and a 1949 dress watch) so I don't have any of that brand envy. I've owned Subs in the past, and I really think the Seamaster is a more beautiful and satisfying watch for my collection.

[@softmetals3702]

same thing happened to me in nashua nh omega to the left of breitling now im on my 5th omega dumped the b1 and never looked back nice choice enjoy

[@NicksterMags]

I bought one of these but I can’t help but notice when I tap the watch it has a little rattle. Does yours do the same and is this normal ?

[@michaelbishop9157]

the Sophia Loren - now that's a beautiful piece

[@youravggentleman]

You need to see this dial in real life to appreciate how beautiful it is. Just got mine, have always wanted a Seamaster (due to bond connection), went to buy the blue and saw this white and fell in love with it. ❤️ I call mine "the great white" 🦈

[@Delveinformation1]

The Seamaster is available to purchase. I got one, barely used, and still under the 5-year warranty for $4000.00. Perfect condition. It's not going to find its value go up as the Submariner has, and the PP Natilus, and the AP Royal Oak. It is going to hold value and with time depreciate a little but essentially it is not a watch to buy as an investment like Rolex and the others, but is a watch to WEAR and to be proud of! Thanks for a great review, and your reviews are always honest, which is why we love ya!

[@ollyw2897]

To be honest. I’d listen to this lady talk about toasters.

[@timchen7424]

same here, same here…

[@hypeandstyle-watches]

The accent is relaxing

[@Bhethar]

She’s so precise yet relaxing

[@markkelly3739]

Actually every night I play one of her videos to help me relax and have a good sleep.

[@michaelbishop9157]

@@markkelly3739 yeah sure that's why you play it

[@libertyv5426]

I bought this watch today and love the white dial. Your video helped me pick white over black and blue. I love it so far!

[@davep323]

The first thing people think when they see a Rolex is “is it real?” And that’s why the seamaster is absolutely the winner out of the two.

[@aininth5451]

So true

[@rumporridge1]

DieselPower lol exactly. They’re all punters anyway as per the Pontiff.

[@thelazysushi]

That’s a problem of the person asking the question, not the wearer. Who cares what others think?

[@gilluminati-2042]

That's very positive thinking

[@nomansland120]

Once you're surrounded by the 1% nobody asks "is it real".

[@wingeren]

Hoping that 2020 is the year the watch websites, forums, and KZbin channels team up to take the legs out of this ridiculously overinflated Rolex market. There are just sooo many other great watches to discuss and review under $10k. Great channel, keep it up! :-)

[@phmwu7368]

I recommend You learn bit about the amazing history of watches #MoonwatchUniverse

[@rousseau327]

Unfortunately people who can actually make the difference are celebrities and influencers. People don't like Rolex because of its craftsmanship, history, or reliability, they like it because it's the hype

[@sobeit712]

Great, hoping one stupidity and hype to be the cure for another stupidity and hype. Do you even hear yourself?

[@rousseau327]

@@sobeit712 Is that directed at me? You want to elaborate on your argument? How else do you believe the hype for Rolex will die down? How else do you think previous hypes have die down? Because people chasing hype found something else to focus on, and the hype for the previous product died down. If people believe and continue to believe that Rolex is the symbol of wealth and want to own that part of the product, this hype won't end. Happy to hear why you think that's a stupid argument.

[@sobeit712]

@@rousseau327 No, the comment was directed at wingeren. As for the question on how to cure hype, that's the question of the century isn't it? People just need to be conscious and sensible about the things they invest their money and energy in. Simply put, when you have a clear mind and are conscious in your decision making, you will be less impulsive and driven by hypes. Otherwise, what he was saying and further illustrated by you is using one distraction to overcome another obsession.

[@davidmeier8860]

The bracelet has always let the Seamaster down in my opinion. That said, I have both the Rolex and the Seamaster (40mm) and Omega gets much more wrist time. If Omega would improve the bracelet and make this model in a 39 or 40, they world have both a Sub and Black Bay 58 killer. Love the videos.!!!!

[@michaelbishop9157]

Agreed the bracelet is garbage. If they drop the HEV and use sword hands then they really could compete with the sub and pelagos and others

[@rolandharris6843]

yes - the bracelet absolutely sucks. They need to give it an oyster bracelet with a decent taper. The movement is oustanding so just need to get that bracelet sorted.

[@henrywest7217]

I've now seen a number of your presentations. So I hope that you don't mind me saying that you're just the right balance of seriousness and cheerfulness. And also, thanks for the excellent review of one of my favorite watches.

[@ryan_chandler]

the right balance of seriousness and cheerfulness, that's how I'd describe most German gals I know

[@dariodeagostini]

One point that I see everyone failing to raise in those comparisons is "how modern" the watch looks. If you buy a watch to complete your image and so you care about its design & style (which is more common than caring about its tech specs), the Seamaster divers is a watch that screams 21th century loudly... it has fine details, shiny materials, perfect engravings... it's rich and detailed. It's MODERN. The Sub is awesome, but it clearly shows its design years, it's "classic". If they were cars, the submariner would be the Ferrari 512bb, the Seamaster would be the F12 berlinetta. I think the choice between the sub and the 300m diver is mostly about the different image you want to project, not the tech specs (which I disagree with you: they are not on par, they are MUCH in favour of the Omega).

[@YiannisPanagiotopoulos]

Totally well said budd

[@tonyfu2200]

I agree with you that this Seamaster being modern and a Submariner being classic. In 20 years time, this Seamaster will be dated, while a Sub continues to be timeless. Just look at how dated a 1990s Seamaster is vs a submariner from that era, and their prices on used market strongly reflected that as well.

[@dariodeagostini]

@@tonyfu2200 I agree with you, but perhaps not for the reason you think. what makes the sub design stand the time is actually the fact that rolex doesn't change it. The problem with omega is their lack of will to stick to a design and commit for decades to it. The current seamaster will be "old" because omega will release 10 new divers in the next 10 years, all different.

[@luispadilla2212]

@@tonyfu2200 My brother has a Rolex Submariner from 1987 and looks like crap he agrees with me. The bracelets is stamped and feels like crap and the movement is nothing to brag about. A new Rolex Submariner will always be better than an old one. In my opinion.

[@gyang333]

The challenge with the "modern" look of the Seamaster, is how soon before it looks dated and out of style?

[@REDREDStrawberry]

Absolutely killing it. One of the best watch channel. All your videos are a must watch for me now. Keep it up, very good job,

[@panaristiman1243]

Hi Everyone !!! Great show Jenni !! I personally owned a Rolex DeepSea James Cameron and a Rolex Explorer II Polar 42mm, also owned an Omega Planet Ocean Michael Phelps 45.5 and a Omega Planet Ocean GMT 43.5 mm and this my firs Omega a very special Watch the Omega Seamaster blue dial I purchased in 1995 inspired in the James Bond movie Golden Eye, love that watch this watch was the beginning of my next passion Watches can’t thanks enough Omega, I decide to passed to my son, now with this new Seamaster 300 am in love 😍 again with this model specially with the this new dial and bezel make this watch a stunning piece the and let me tell you something Jenni you pick the perfect Seamaster white dial rubber strap stunning watch, am going to be honest the Seamaster is a better Watch for the money 💰 you can’t go wrong with the Seamaster superb quality, in house movement, 5 years Warranty definitely a bargain if you compare with the Rolex Submariner take care guys Bruce. Boca Raton Fl

[@daveleung857]

Hi Jenni, I believe that the SMP 300 is definitely better than the Sub due to the fact it is readily available in the boutique and also a lot cheaper and you can get a discount. I have the blue dial with rubber strap as my daily beater and with the ceramic bezel, dial design and antimagnetic movement, it beats the s Sub hands down as I own the Kermit and made the comparison myself. I know the Sub model that I have is pre-ceramic however comparing both watches with the pricing, definitely Omega SMP300 kills the Submariner.

[@Darkmattersfrank]

I love the sound of your voice and accent. Sincerely from America

[@SGT-MACK9096]

OK you are right

[@wisfanatic]

I'm wearing this exact model as I watch this video and i'm like "yep agreed, yep agreed, yep agreed". lol

[@galatians22122]

Yep i agree you only wish you could afford the Rolex.

[@jimlittle5769]

@@galatians22122 yup, he only wishes he could, after waiting for a year to hear from his AD, get the privilege of spending 50%-60% more money for an inferior product so he can have the name Rolex stamped to his wrist.

[@galatians22122]

@@jimlittle5769Omega Ha Ha Ha what a joke! I own an omega What's that? a new Kia Car Model. The Kia Omega! Ha Ha Ha!

[@livedeliciously]

That dial is what makes it really special. Those lines are so damn elegant.

[@greggbull9543]

Very nice review, thanks. I have a 2000’s 16610 and a Seamaster PO with the 2500 movement, both massively different watches and I would never choose one over the other, I wear them on different days and for different occasions so I love them both.

[@killazx9]

No wonder the sub cannot be found in ADs, they were all killed :) Rolex's Superlative is +2/-2, they don't do the regular COSC which is +6/-4. I personally think the blue and the grey dials to be the most interesting. If you are not crazy about the Rolex hype, this Omega is a better buy.

[@tonyfu2200]

killazx9 the blue and grey on bracelet is under 4K on watchmaxx.

[@mattphelan6604]

It’s been the hottest day of the year here in the UK today and I’ve been wearing my ceramic blue Seamaster outdoors. It’s been the first time I’ve really noticed how the shade of blue changes in the sunlight. It’s stunning.

[@PepRex]

I prefer the white.

[@justonemovement]

I would go further and say that the grey dial one is the most unique.....just stands out of the crowd without dazzling you.

[@threehander]

Jenni, you mentioned the rotor inside the Seamaster as being loud. I would love for you to tackle the new 3235 movement by Rolex as those are cement mixers in the back!

[@rvsmairspace6742]

@Jason Holt Wouldn't the fact that one case back is crystal and the other steel make a difference in rotor sound? My Seamster is definitely not loud but not completely silent either.But unless you bring the watch to your ear, you will not hear it.

[@sweeney5296]

3235 is as silent as they get

[@threehander]

@Mark Michael Watch clockbait's video on the Batman. It's due to the ceramic ball bearings on the rotor and it is noticeable. I have both right in front of me. No comparison.

[@threehander]

@Mark Michael TBH I don't mind that much but it certainly matches some of my Seikos. And is blindingly obvious when next to my 5 digit sub.

[@paikiah77]

3:40 dust particle near date window. Despicable!... still thinking of getting one next month :)

[@dnalekaw4699]

I think you're seeing things mate

[@PhilbyFavourites]

Once seen, you can’t unsee it 👍🏻 I thought it was a toast crumb on my iPad, but I bow to your exemplary observation.

[@Hard_7_Iron]

I have a 20 year old Seamaster Chrono. It’s as good today, as the day it came out of the box! I’m not sure I’d ever own a Rolex. Love the videos. Nice job.

[@Bogart1980]

The black bezel, white dial combo is insane. If I didn’t have a polar explorer, I’d run out now to get one, but I’ll probably settle on the blue.

[@siddarthh9089]

I'm in that position now, have a black SMP 300 but been lusting after the polar dial. Do you think I should make the jump? I'm getting a good deal with 216570 at $9800

[@SL-lk9bw]

Your English with German accent is very soothing.

[@dbkincaid1]

I’m from the US. Your voice and accent is so captivating. I’ve enjoyed your videos. Keep up the good work.

[@ajgross67]

If Omega would make a 38 or 39mm version of this I would be all over it! But right now 42mm is just too big for my tastes

[@brysoga]

I'm in the same boat with regards to the planet Ocean with white dial and orange bezel. That's 43.5mm which is utter lunacy, they do a PO in 39.5mm but not the white and orange colours. It they release it I'll be ordering immediately.

[@smyffmawzz]

Same here ..I ended up with an SKX013...It's made me think ...

[@smyffmawzz]

monochrome-watches.com/smaller-is-better-case-study-with-the-39-5mm-omega-seamaster-planet-ocean-600m/

[@totallyinteresting68]

I've got the 36mm and you don't notice the 2mm difference at all. The lug to lug is large enough that it doesn't look bulky or overly small. Might want to check that one out!

[@johnhatton730]

the sub is 41, why the obsession with small watches? not hating, just doesn’t make sense to me, guess its just preference...

[@yidarmy123]

Just received mine. My first ever luxury watch. Saved for years and years so this means a lot to me. Got it on a orange strap at the moment and looks great.

[@wdanielt419871987]

Congrats ! Beautiful time piece!

[@yidarmy123]

@@wdanielt419871987 thanks Daniel! It hasn’t left my wrist since.

[@Nahduge]

The white dial on bracelet is just perfect.

[@normanpedersen5454]

I like the white dial - it seems less busy than the dark one.

[@giangvu7902]

Omega is definitely doing some good stuff lately. I wouldn’t really say the bracelet is inferior to the Submariner. It’s quite nice actually. Maybe the micro adjustment is not as intuitive as the Rolex, but the build quality is definitely there.

[@charlesgoodall6718]

The Tudor Pelagos is another alternative - quite close on spec and price

[@rosshilton]

Charles Goodall Rolex reintroduced the Tudor as a counter to Omega. This makes Omega compete with Tudor not Rolex....... Nice positioning!

[@rosshilton]

Armando Sturzenegger Yes. Rolex introduced the Tudor name in 1926, and for many years it was a lower price model using the same Rolex oyster case, but fitted with ETA movements. As such they were very popular with the military, including the US Navy Seals. They started winding down production around 2000, but in 2009 they were reintroduced, probably to counter the Omega range.

[@michaelbishop9157]

@@rosshilton not to counter the range but to reinforce the gap and elevate the brand

[@user-fg6th9lq1b]

Because of your first video and you Jenni, i have purchased this Omega Seamaster 300m with black dial and black rubber strap. First time i trust a stranger, first time i am satisfied with a stranger. What. A. Timepiece. Thanks so much for your input and great taste.

[@corecasrcworld7100]

Again a fantastic review and a beautiful piece, your voice is such a joy to listen too. Look forward to your next episode 😉👌🏽

[@franco2350]

Hi I own both Omega and Rolex and love them equally

[@troobs1990]

I have just picked up this watch in the James Bond edition with the swirl dial. Absolutely beautiful.

[@Watchugoton]

Oliver Truby how long you had it and does it feel as good as it looks? It’s the one omega that just keeps calling me, I’ve had few vintage omega’s but not new models. I’ve pulled trigger on 4 tudors in a year and just held a p01. That bond edition looks sublime hope you enjoy it.

[@troobs1990]

Andrew Jenkins picked it up on Saturday, not usually a fan of rubber straps but it works so well! Came with the bracelet too which is comfy. I have a black bay and an Explorer and haven’t taken the Seamaster off yet! Huge fan.

[@Watchugoton]

Any negatives so far & love to see how you feel about it it 6 - 12 months in Hope you enjoy it

[@jumboJetPilot]

I might have to pick one up just for nostalgia’s sake. My uncle was the sound producer for James Bond from Dr. No through Octopussy and was close personal friends with Sean Connery. That would be a fun talking point at family reunions!

[@michaelsinclair3321]

I don't have the Bond edition but it still looks and says BOND JAMES BOND, I'm sure the Queen would approve👍🏼

[@ismaelbonal6537]

Finally you made an Omega Seamaster review. I would also add this is the absolute best option for an entry luxurious watch... way better than a Rolex Oyster! The movement is hands down better than that of Rolex and so is the overall specs sheet.

[@michaelbishop9157]

it's better than an OP for sure but worse than a Tudor pelagos which is an interesting consideration

[@lucasgastondiez4080]

gotta say jenni, these videos are impressive! and i'm becoming a huge fan of the channel great reviews, great products and great video as well! 10/10! personally, i've been looking to get a seamaster with the grey and blue dial, i think it's a pretty balanced watch and can't wait to get one!

[@steven3379]

One of these is my grail watch... I just can't make up my mind about which color I like best! Thanks Jenni!

[@metalobliteration]

I purchased the Blue variant of this, I highly recommend it to everyone considering this watch because you essentially get 3 different dial colors depending on the lighting situation. Daylight gives you a bright ocean blue, indoor lighting gives you vibrant navy, and low light situations give you a dark navy/ black dial look. Hope my input gives some food for thought!

[@snifflytooth]

I’m with you there, can’t decide on a colour. Love this white, but then see the grey face with blue bezel... I agree the blue looks awesome as well

[@doomplatoon3393]

The black on rubber strap is an imposing version of this imposing watch..i went for it after the rubber strap felt so comfortable and it's great.

[@allenhaines317]

@@metalobliteration My experience, too.

[@richardvono9672]

Black and gold with the rubber strap is the one! Love.

[@commander1067]

great, high professional, personable and warm presentation! Thank you very much Jürgen

[@rbeneveds]

Absolutely love that you reviewed this Watch! Omega fan for life!

[@Vitros463449]

Such a great quality of review, so I subscribed.I have been looking at this watch for a while and you confirmed my view of this watch. Thank you.

[@jonstrongman3292]

I have an older Seamaster and after seeing this video, I want a white one! Stunning design and the lume looked fantastic

[@lesfistons4798]

New models are too big

[@heliolima7552]

In 2004 I bought my first luxury watch, it’s was a Omega Seamaster blue dial and stell bracelet, the James Bond model. Love that watch and I’ll never sell it. This version is an upgrade, I like it

[@ChameleonsFan]

It looks stunning with the white dial. To me it's clearly the most attractive option.

[@mikelawrence6840]

agree but i also like the black!

[@acaferacer6649]

Personally I think that despite the two watches being compared a hell of a lot that they actually fill two different markets. The seamaster more commonly will act as a first foray into luxury watches as it is such a value packed watch with unique design detailing and a heritage to match. The fact you cannot get a steel sports model when you walk into an AD means the equivalent sub just cant compete with the seamaster unless you are willing to drop double the retail value of the seamaster on the watch which many seamaster buyers are not looking at doing... Either way you make great points suggesting the strength of this watch as it certainly is a great watch but a submariner buyer would most likely not consider buying a seamaster as a replacement rather they would buy it and then sell it while they are on the waitlist for the subs. Anyway great video Jenni! Love the production quality as always!

[@shaf1485h]

It comes down to personal preference, I prefer the Seamaster over the submariner. One thing Rolex has over Omega is value retention.

[@TruckeeDoggo]

I don’t really think it’s a “first foray” watch, with an MSRP of $5,200, or even with a discount. It used to be everyone’s first good watch 10 years ago, but the prices have gradually moved up every year such that it’s basically a fine luxury watch, period. A first foray watch today would be something like an Oris, Longines, or even Tudor Black Bay diver. This watch is a little too spendy to be a first foray watch anymore for many.

[@acaferacer6649]

@@TruckeeDoggo I would agree with you mate, the only thing is you can't get a sub at retail so the secondary market is the only option. comparing apples to apples is only fair so when you look at their secondary market values I think the seamaster slips back into that bracket for many. I would agree with you though about the retail price having crept up in recent years and therefore making it less of a first luxury watch.

[@TruckeeDoggo]

Hout & Co good point. Pre owned the new Seamaster can be obtained in the low 4K range U.S., but that was the price of the SMP brand new about seven years ago. Used SMPs could be had under 3k back then. The price increase has been significant, and watches like the Oris 65, Black Bay, etc., are more recent and significantly cheaper options. I hope the Seamaster maintains its status as a good first mechanical watch for many. It is much better watch than the cheaper options I mentioned

[@acaferacer6649]

HokeyBear yes I would agree with you wholeheartedly. If it changed then sadly an iconic watch which means so much to so many will no longer be that for many people

[@mrbud8524]

No watch kills the Rolex Submariner every diver watch wants to kill the Submariner the Submariner is one of the most iconic watches in the world its iconic, timeless, classic, king of cool Steve Mcqueen wore one sells above retail price there's no Substitute when it comes to Rolex Submariner. If you want the next best thing its got to be the Omega Seamaster 300 42m blue dail

[@frankk8775]

Very nice review, as far as the rotors making loud noises go. It's the ceramic washers they are using now to reduce the friction and wear and tear. JLC uses them as well with some of their movements!

[@midlane757]

My favorite variation of this watch, incredible shots!

[@super1million11]

I just bought one of these today. My only regret was not getting the white dial, but I was in the store debating between the two for 30 minutes and they gave me a coin to flip I did best 2 out of three and each time it landed on black so I had to choose black.

[@svfutbol20]

The refresh is absolutely stunning. I’m keeping an eye out for pre-owned models myself.

[@svfutbol20]

Peter Mhina I’ve gotten a couple of cheaper watches from Joma, but hesitate to go for a luxury purchase there. Report back if you have any issues

[@rsw552]

Her accent makes this channel even better.

[@NJ87-90]

I have just let go of my Omega Seamaster after 15 years without any problems not even a service needed absolutely flawless, so I have replaced it with another (updated version) & just to say I could have had a Rolex deep sea James Cameron tho a beautiful timepiece just unnecessary for my needs..I always say buy the watch you like not what everyone else likes!

[@edwardbaker2192]

I own both. Always a Rolex guy until two years ago. I have owned my Subbie since 1986 and I was going to retire it and buy a redline Seadweller. So I go to the AD and told that if I spent $5000 on other store purchases I would have the honor of being placed on a waiting list for a dweller. Another dealer called me on a Friday before closing and didn’t even give me a chance to call back. The watch was gone by noon the next day. That was after a three year wait. Screw them. I had the sub completely rebuilt with a new bracelet for 2k. After all that, I just wanted a new watch. Something different. So I walk into a store in Richmond and asked if they had a 300 M blue face and in ten minutes I had a beautiful new watch. I don’t give a shit what others think about it, and to be honest the Rolex doesn’t magically open up doors to some imagined status elevation. Most watch guys will know what you are wearing and will appreciate your taste, but you will never know it. So buy the watch for you. Be selfish in this way. Another thing, no watch is worth going into debt for. If you can’t stroke a check, pay off the credit card in one payment, or debit the cost of the watch, you don’t need to be buying any Rolex, Omega, Blanc Paine, or IWC.. Go to Walmart and buy a GShock. They are a great watch for the money and are more accurate than any of the automatics above and most watch guys will notice that you have bought a great watch for the money.

[@antoinemozart243]

This white and black sea master is gorgeous.

[@heathdeville9869]

I purchased my seamaster pro 600m approx in 2007 and have worn it so hard over the years. Including multiple scuba dive trips, uncountable salt water fishing, snorkeling and week long white water rafting trips. It still looks great and I had it looked at by a watch maker today who says it is within specifications but he would replace the seals due to the age. I have zero complaints about omega and would happily buy another. I was actually there looking at the seamaster 007, railmaster and the seamaster 300 heritage models.

[@robertparker6141]

What a difference from the homely faces on most watch websites !! Well, I am exaggerating, but not completely !! A pretty face, but also very knowledgable !! Please keep it up !!

[@kfrankie6912]

Can you do a review on Longines HydroConquest? Please

[@angelopopa3731]

I own the seamasete and is amazing,you miss to mention co-axial for omega.... I think sub vs seamaster you choose witch you love most because you sed and I agree in terms of quality is the same...

[@Superdada]

This is the first video I’ve watched on your channel and I’m so impressed! Well done and can’t wait to see more. On a side note, which color is your favorite on the 300M? The black and rose gold really stands out to me.

[@Watchmeifyoucan]

One suggestion: when comparing two brands it could be useful to mention that Omega was founded in 1848 in Switzerland whereas Rolex was founded in 1908 (1905 London) via partnership with a swiss company in Bienne called Aegler. I find this relevant for those who truly seek Swiss watches, in my humble opinion Rolex is great, I also love it, I will add to my collection, but they are not truly Swiss.

[@carlgomez7077]

Amazing video and even more amazing video quality. Great job Jenni. Excellent video.

[@MrSwiss313]

I just don't like the bracelet and the escape valve, otherwise a very nice watch.

[@erikv1974]

I used to hate them as well but the more I saw these watches in the metal and on people's wrists, the whole image of the watch just "makes sense". I don't love the escape valve, I think Rolex & Tudor's 9 o' clock EV is much more good looking (because you can't really see it, lol). But it just works so well anyway. It grew on me.

[@john-carlosynostroza]

Right? Two pretty big elements...

[@PepRex]

When you see the bracelet without even seeing the watch you know it's a seamaster, The bracelet is iconic.

[@ericmal5055]

Jenni, love your program. Based on your review the Omega is better technically and less expensive. Especially when it comes to the antimagnetic attributes of the Omega. I agree a Rolex is a Rolex but I believe branding should be left out of a straight comparison when it comes to tool watches. Keep up the great programming!

[@OmerBonfil]

I personally will always choose Omega over Rolex. I own the Omega Seamaster Professional 225450. I feel Omega is much more committed to creating timepieces rather than business investments. When I see someone wearing an Omega, I know he is much more interested in the watch and not how much profit he would make when he'd want to sell it.

[@toomuch10601]

I also have this watch. The 2254.50 is a classic already. Will never sell it.

[@DBravo29er]

Exactly!

[@Touyoujin]

As much as I would like to think that those who wear an Omega are sour grapes, I also believe that it’s not always the case. The same goes for those who wear a Rolex, there are those who into watches just like other watch enthusiasts.

[@john-carlosynostroza]

Jenni= best new watch content/ channel on KZbin. Almost instantly in my Subscriptions.

[@dltraining6044]

I love this time piece. I like the size too. 42 mm is perfect for my wrist.

[@offroadaaron]

I love how people for some reason say 42mm is perfect when realistically it's more lug to lug width which plays a larger role.

[@dltraining6044]

@@offroadaaron That is true too. I have a large wrist and this is perfect.

[@bernardhossmoto]

I saw the blue one at a dealer last week and fell in love. Keep in mind it's a "professional Diver's watch", so the rubber strap has to be constructed like that (wrapping around the diver's suit). The bracelet has a quick adjuster for that, like on the Submariner.

[@86dM]

Beautiful! Omega too!

[@drzaius844]

The black dial version is incredible and I will own it. Thanks for another great video!

[@sandippatel1969]

Jenni, thanks so much for your review and other videos. I've just ordered a Seamaster 300m with the white dial after weighing up the alternatives that you mentioned. The Rolex just isn't for me and (for me) is a little less contemporary. I got one with a steel bracelet but ordered a black strap for a less formal alternative. Thanks again! Truly an everyday watch

[@timsalthouse4329]

nice review again Jenni - you have now reviewed 2 of my watches in your recent videos as I have the black dial seamaster and the rhodium OP39. I have had a ceramic submariner and sold it as it got little wrist time once I bought a 16710 GMT master II. the seamaster is a "better" watch than the sub in many ways but the rolex model is a superstar and I would fully understand why people will accept nothing less than a sub and hence the silly prices. at one third the cost and available the seamaster is the thinking man's choice.

[@hendrik9527]

I love the design (except for the new helium escape valve) and the colors. But it's way too big compared to the sub and previous seamaster models, too bulky. So, I'd prefer a previous generation seamaster. It would probably look great on a rubber strap as well.

[@WingZeroCustom001]

Love the design but it is massive 😡

[@BARYOAVI]

Hi, I think that not yet, just tried it on my wrist at an Omega authorized dealer (gray dial with steel bracelet version) and it looked too “loud” and like saying “look at me” my Rolex Ceramic on the other hand doesn’t need to do nothing to take your attention, it is quietly lays and whispering “I’m the best “ ☺️. I’m again enjoyed very much watching your video. Thanks 🙏🏻

[@btmontres1423]

A very nice review with thoughtful commentary. For many the submariner is the preferred option but availability is a major problem. I have never considered this before since I once owned a seamaster GMT white dial with an ETA 2892 that i loved until it took a knock killing its timekeeping accuracy. This would be a great replacement.

[@v3sinned]

Love the reviews💪 can you please do some reviews on IWC? The new Portuguese 40mm maybe??

[@mantasufc]

Absolutely magnificent timepiece. Superb quality. And also twice cheaper than a sub!

[@jmlupoludowicy1239]

I’m a bit late to the party here but after buying a white dial Seamaster 300m on the bracelet yesterday I noticed that on my watch only the minute hand is fitted with green lume, the hour hand glows in blue just like the indices. With the green glowing pip on the bezel this layout makes absolute sense. I’m wondering how many of these watches with two green lumed hands are out there and when Omega made the change. Some people might perhaps own a future collectible if there’s only a handful of these out and about… but we’re talking Omega here so the „handful” will probably be in the thousands.

[@thegridman1]

Just purchased the Aqua Terra with a black dial! Also, I wanted to thank you for creating your channel. Great content so far, looking forward to the videos to come.

[@valtermuskiopancho]

Hi dear youtuber It’s rare that someone talk about Rolex watches without to say they are the best I love your video and your kind to talk about watches in they. Love you 😘

[@felixbohnacker7188]

Great video! I just love everything about the Seamaster Diver 300m. The blue version will be my next purchase later this year. As I have a 6.7-inch wrist, I was afraid that it might be too large at first. However, it looks and feels great.

[@Frank-vo9xo]

I believe brightening is better than both. Because the brightening vessel is screwed on, it can't be knocked off. The brightening is 300 m sealed as well. It is also certified just as omega is more money than the omega

[@W1NGZER0]

Great video on a great watch. Will we ever get to see your personal collection?

[@lisablackwell7658]

Great video Jenni. I purchased an Omega Seamaster Diver 300m and I really like it.

[@chazzcombs]

I would take the Omega every day of the week over any Rolex. My wife's Aqua Terra has the same 8800 movement and the rotor is completely unnoticeable. Maybe that's due to the case size (hers is 34mm and this one is 42mm).

[@omg_stoppit]

The only thing that turns me off from the Seamaster is the case size. I love the aesthetic and contrast of the white dial and black bezel, but I would prefer the watch be 40 mm to compete with the Tudor Black Back 58. I have a feeling that Rolex will increase the case size on the Sub, but 41 mm is the comfortable limit of a watch on my 6.5" wrist. As a consequence, I'd rather get the Tudor despite me preferring ceramic bezels over aluminum or steel.

[@gyang333]

Why would a smaller case (and therefor less heft and material) dampen the sound of the rotor? Sounds like inconsistent QC.

[@RickyRicon2023]

@@omg_stoppit but lug to lug is 49 is not to big, i have 6.1 6.2 inc wrist and im thinking in buy one, cus the case is 42 but it isn't too large and the shape and design it gives that impresion of a smaller watch instead of 42mm, it is awesome. Tudor of 42 mm it is huge, a monster

[@aaronvo972]

Its not Omega matching Rolex in terms of finishing. It's Omega outright beating Rolex's finishing. I mean dial alone

[@bernarrcoletta7419]

I have to say that I like the Seamaster’s case better than the Sub’s.

[@AlwaysBolttheBird]

Right. The Sub always looked weird to me. It looks like a circle on a rectangle

[@LuisFranciscoAguilar]

Always Bolt the Bird Yeah, SM300 looks so normal, with a muffin sticked to its case😂

[@jonathansaraco]

Beautiful video! The dial looks amazing in these shots. Though to be fair, you'd probably have to try very hard to make the watch NOT look good. It's just that stunning. I really hope Omega can scale back the size of this watch, though. I love Omega's modern divers, but they always have some sort of size issue. The Planet Ocean comes in a variety of case diameters, but they're always much too thick because of the high water resistance rating. This Seamaster would be better at 40mm or even 39mm, so let's hope Omega releases a mid-size version soon.

[@dariodeagostini]

i strongly suggest you to watch the video about midsize seamaster from IDGUY: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iYamdmWtapqemqM

[@pyromaniac12345]

Was really hoping you would do a video on the Omega Seamaster, and you did! Happy is an understatement.

[@andy1971kim]

The New Omega is Beautiful!!!

[@respectanimals2]

I’m enjoying your vids , they are very uplifting and informative in all the right ways 👍😎

[@DrRandomStranger]

02:27 i disagree. Prince William wears his omega seamaster to every event, since he got it as a present from his mother. He even wore it to his own wedding. And could there be a more formal ocassion than a royla wedding?

[@michaelbishop9157]

that's for sentimental reasons only

[@DrRandomStranger]

@@michaelbishop9157 So? The reason doesn’t matter. Matter of fact: a prince wore a omega seamaster to his own royal wedding.

[@michaelbishop9157]

@@DrRandomStranger well it does because you're using the point to argue Jenny's comment that it's not an every occasion watch. The fact he wore it for sentimental reasons to honour his deceased mother does nothing to counter her point. I personally feel this is a casual sports piece and looks very odd with a suit or or formal occasions

[@DrRandomStranger]

@@michaelbishop9157 of course, you're right, i argue with the fact, that he wore a sports watch to a formal occasion. He could have worn any watch, his mother gave him. If it was a bulky casio, he'd wear the casio. But don't we look closely on wrists of celebrities to spot the next trend? Why is a rolex working with a seit, but not a seamaster? There is no logical reason, only sentimental or celebrities who did it first.

[@ssouzagui]

I really like your video, nice and clear voice, very good to improve the listening and watches knowledge!

[@mdesmet9111]

Great quality video! I got both the Sub and the Seamaster Pro and even though they are competitors, you can hardly compare them. They are both amazing watches, but both in very different ways. Personally I disagree about the bracelet and actually find this the clearest aspect where the Omega is better. The Rolex bracelet looks better and more refined, but the Omega bracelet feels extremely well made and the Omega push system in the clasp works easier and more accurate than the Rolex glidelock. The only aspect where the Sub is clearly better is the bezel action. The Omega bezel is good, but the one on the Sub is just the best...

[@mysterio5837]

for the price where you could get 3 different omega seamaster pros, definitely wins than 1 Rolex sub

[@Jmatoz80]

any rumor for omega SMP 300 in the upcoming Baselworld 2020? Would love to see it in a smaller case. 40~41mm perhaps?