How to play Shogi(将棋) -Lesson#26- Handicapped Games (2/2)

[@HIDETCHI]

I used a PSP software "GEKISASHI ~Jouseki-Dojo~". You can look up Jousekis in this software, and also play against AI starting from opening or middlegame situations in many Jousekis.

[@miroslavkolarov484]

hidetchi was flexing a decade before flexing existed

[@a4ashiro438]

Hes Gone

[@HIDETCHI]

Thanks for leaving a comment. Please enjoy my later videos, too.

[@clovermite]

I played a lot of dragonfly in Yakuza 0 (challenge 2), thinking it would be better to train myself when my opponent has less pieces. I definitely learned that having more pieces can be a disadvantage. I consistently broke through on the edge, either with my bishop or with a lance...but then I had no pieces to capture for a drop close to the king. Meanwhile, my opponent would counterattack and often grab my lance and knight or silver, giving him more drops. My promoted pieces were on the opposite side of the king, so he could threaten me quicker than i could threaten him.

[@HIDETCHI]

Yes, Josekis are collections of good moves for both sides. But this R-1b is very famous as an excellent Uwate's move in Lance handicap.

[@iLuvHinata360]

Nice PSP ^^. I never thought that having more pieces could be a disadvantage o.O, many thanks for pointing that out ^^'. Arigatai desu, for this video ^^'.

[@mintcake2668]

The PSP sure brings back memories.

[@HIDETCHI]

I don't think it's something you can download. I bought it in a game software shop in Japan.

[@FoodPunch]

I agree, great initiative taken :D

[@MrFass]

Thanks for your video! Very informative and I can't wait for your next ones... It's a really great initiative you've taken with this series,so thanks again!! :D

[@OneyePL]

You should add that we should play josekis only when we understand then. For example 9:55 when +P 2c looks good, but it isn't, because of bishop exchange and Rx3f. Btw, that why Sente protect that pawn and Gote exchanges bishop in next move. Josekis are really smart ^^ Oh and aren't josekis good for both sides? (in go [igo] they are)

[@simonguoxm]

I finally reach here. :-)