Those lil boys are so cute!!! 🥰 🫶🏽😍Thank you for blessing us with your beautiful family blessings tonight! So awesome 👏
@cr33pykrawlrgrl2 ай бұрын
I need to get baptized in the holy spirit.
@JojoCruz-ln3wv2 ай бұрын
The protein shake analogy hit🔥🔥 love that after giving my life to Christ any and everything you do can be analogy to prove what God is doing in our lives
@justin513price2 ай бұрын
Amen
@lydialozano23072 ай бұрын
I love this teaching I love how Brother Richard breaks everything down I’ve heard so many times people saying that they were speaking in different languages… but no they were interpreting what they were saying in their own language spiritually it makes so much sense❣️❣️❣️
@mariannoruiz8332 ай бұрын
Very Good
@davo13882 ай бұрын
Supernatural
@fhwmwithmarcy2 ай бұрын
Amen!
@davo13882 ай бұрын
Rooted
@МаріяКосар-и4к2 ай бұрын
🔥
@rabbon-ithegenesis71692 ай бұрын
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
@kiki102022 ай бұрын
🔥🔥🔥
@mistypfitzer1112 ай бұрын
Ive done everything, ive prayed 4 it asked 4 it, had someone pray for me to receive it, prayed 4 me to be baptized in the holy spirit & fire...ive watched every video i can on it, even completed a course on it, still NOTHING comes out but english. 😭 pretty convinced im broken at this point. I give up.
@frisby1032 ай бұрын
You are not broken!! The gifts God gives to us God decides. Not everyone will speak in tongues. Please read the Bible on this and you'll understand. Paul says I WISH you could all speak in tongues. But I'd rather you all prophesied. Please read I believe 1 Corinthians chapter 12-14 it explains all of this.
@frisby1032 ай бұрын
Jesus did not speak in tongues! There are other gifts, healing, teachers, prophecy.... If you want I can take pictures of the scriptures to prove to you.... It's only one sign of the holy Spirit not THE sign of the holy Spirit. I'm starting to really dislike this teaching, how its being taught is wrong. Some people literally have just the gift of service, serving others. My name is the same on here as Facebook.
@brgeundheim81152 ай бұрын
Bro dont give up! I have been praying for receiving the gift of tongues for almost 3 months, and I yet have not received it. But I know what the Word of God says, and I will keep on praying. As should you!
@TheGreat-uk8fz2 ай бұрын
Keep pressing in, don’t quit. Ask The Holy Spirit to guide you and he will
@cr33pykrawlrgrl2 ай бұрын
I wanna be like that too.
@cr33pykrawlrgrl2 ай бұрын
I'm having trouble getting connected with the LSRO cause I have no money. What do I do???
@cr33pykrawlrgrl2 ай бұрын
Religion does suck. I'm I live in Wichita Kansas and I don't think I've seen anybody on fire for God the way that I need. I know that there's a lot of churches like your church and Marcus Roger's, church and the cure church, but we have nothing like that here. And it discourages me because I feel like I need to be surrounded by like-minded. People who actually want to be on Fire for God. And I can't find it. What do I do?
@miriamrodriguez80512 ай бұрын
🙌
@matas_12 ай бұрын
1111 🔥🔥🔥
@GalexyLuz2 ай бұрын
Wo wo wo this is still going?
@elizabethrios10132 ай бұрын
What that statue behind you pastor ?
@frisby1032 ай бұрын
Acts chapter 2 explains this. But speaking in tongues is other native languages, and someone should be there to interpret. When God intercedes for us or prays for us when we don't know what to pray it's moans and groans that can not be described with words. Please do read your Bible.
@TheGreat-uk8fz2 ай бұрын
Ask Jesus himself what he has to say about it
@davo13882 ай бұрын
1
@PrayingtoKingofNazarethАй бұрын
No One
@imbackupcodm21182 ай бұрын
No longer live
@fhwmwithmarcy2 ай бұрын
No one
@cometochristministries2044Ай бұрын
👅
@kavikv.d.hexenholtz34742 ай бұрын
There is absolutely nothing mysterious about Biblical "tongues" - and there is only *one* type - when referring to something spoken, they are nothing more than real, rational language(s); usually, but not always, unknown to those listening to them, but always known by the speaker(s) - it’s their native language (in some cases, it is a language the speaker has learned). Indeed, there are absolutely _no_ Biblical references to “tongues” that do not refer to, and cannot be explained in light of, real rational language(s), ‘Tongues’ (read, *‘languages’* ) - the divine gift, is the God/Holy Spirit given ability to effortlessly learn to speak and be understood through real-language barriers. It is not xenoglossy (as many people incorrectly assume), nor is it the self-created non-cognitive non-language utterance of what certain Christian denominations are producing today (modern tongues-speech). _Nowhere_ in the Bible is modern tongues-speech advocated or evidenced.
@brgeundheim81152 ай бұрын
The whole video is literally about debunking what you just wrote
@kavikv.d.hexenholtz34742 ай бұрын
@@brgeundheim8115 It doesn't though - again, there are absolutely no Biblical references to “tongues” that do not refer to, and cannot be explained in light of, real rational language(s). Let's look at modern tongues-speech - what people are producing today and calling "tongues" - The “tongues” Pentecostal and Charismatic Christians are producing today is an entirely self-created phenomenon. It is non-cognitive non-language utterance; random free vocalization based upon a subset of the existing underlying sounds (called phonemes) of the speaker’s native language, and any other language(s) the speaker may be familiar with or have had contact with. It is, in part, typically characterized by repetitive syllables, plays on sound patterns, alliteration, assonance, and over-simplification of syllable structure. The "nail in the coffin", so-to-speak, is that _any and all_ phonological rules (rules governing how sounds are put together in a given language - what is allowed and what is disallowed) governing a speaker's native language, will _also_ govern their tongues-speech. That fact alone negates anything that can be construed as 'divine' in nature and cements that fact that it is a self-created phenomenon. Further, this subset of phonemes mentioned above typically contains only those sounds which are easiest to produce physiologically. Occasionally some speakers will use two or more subsets of phonemes to generate glossolalia, producing what, to them, sounds like two (or more) distinct “tongues languages”, thus claiming to be able to speak in “divers tongues”. There is absolutely _nothing_ that “tongues-speakers” are producing that cannot be explained in relatively simple linguistic terms. Conversely, when it comes to something spoken, there are absolutely _no_ Biblical references to “tongues” that do not refer to, and cannot be explained in light of, real rational language(s), though it may not be the explanation you want to hear, and it may be one which is radically different from what you believe, or were taught. _Nowhere_ in the Bible is modern tongues-speech advocated or evidenced. “Praying in the Spirit” does _not_ refer to the words one is saying. Rather, it refers to how one is praying. In the three places it is used (Corinthians, Ephesians, and Jude), there is absolutely zero reference to 'languages' in connection with this phrase. “Praying in the Spirit” should be understood as praying in the power of the Spirit, by the leading of the Spirit, and according to His will. I'm not doubting or questioning the 'tongues experience'; glossolalia as the spiritual tool that it is, can be very powerful and, for many people, the experience is profound. As one commenter put it, “Speaking in tongues distracts the ego/analytical/conscious mind while leaving the subconscious (the heart) wide open to import the divine." Both the spiritual and physical benefits of using this tool are also well documented. Again though, it is important to note that this same statement can be made for virtually _any_ other culture that practices glossolalia. Religious and cultural differences aside, the glossolalia an Evenki Shaman in Siberia, a vodoun priestess in Togo and a Christian tongues-speaker in Alabama are producing are in no way different from each other. They’re all producing their glossolalia in the exact same way; they just have different explanations and beliefs as to why they’re doing it, and where it comes from. It is only in certain Christian denominations where is it construed as something it never was. “Tongues” is to some Christian believers a very real and spiritually meaningful experience but consisting of emotional release via non-linguistic ‘free vocalizations’ at best; non-cognitive non language utterance - the subconscious playing with sounds to create what is perceived and interpreted as actual, meaningful speech. In _some_ cases, I would argue that it is clearly a self/mass delusion prompted by such a strong desire to “experience God” that one creates that experience via “tongues”. ‘Tongues’ (read, *‘languages’* ) - the divine gift, is the God/Holy Spirit given ability to effortlessly learn to speak and be understood through real-language barriers. It is not xenoglossy (as many people incorrectly assume), nor is it the self-created non-cognitive non-language utterance of what certain Christian denominations are producing today (modern tongues-speech). As a point of note, I’m a Linguist, and let me also add here that I am neither a so-called ‘cessationist’ nor a ‘continuationist’ - I do not identify with either term; in fact, I had never heard the two terms until just late in 2016. As far as I’m concerned, quite frankly, since the Biblical reference of “tongues” is to real, rational languages, obviously “tongues” haven’t “ceased”. It’s always a bit interesting to see how different tongues-speakers skate around what for them is that awkward discrepancy between the real, rational languages of Pentecost and the so-called “prayer language “ of Paul’s letter to the Corinthians. The solution seems to be instituting various “types” of “tongues”. There is only one type of “tongue(s)” in the Bible when referring to something spoken - real rational language(s). To take just one passage - 1Cor. 14:2 is perhaps *the* quintessential verse used by many to “evidence” modern tongues-speech in the Bible. The whole passage is talking about real, rational language. Let me use an analogy - If I attend a worship service in “East Haystack”, some remote town in the US out in the middle of nowhere, two things are going to be evident: one; there’s only going to be so many people at that service (i.e. there will be a finite given amount of people there) and two; the chances that anyone speaks anything *but* English is pretty slim to nil. If I start praying aloud in say Lithuanian, there’s no one at that service that’s going to understand a single word I’m saying. Even though I’m speaking a real language, no one _there_ will understand my “tongue”. That does not mean or imply that no one else understands Lithuanian; just no one at _that particular service._ In this sense, therefore, I am speaking _only to God,_ since he understands all languages. To everyone at the service, even though I’m praying in the Spirit (as defined further below), to the people listening to me, I’m still speaking “mysteries” - i.e. even though I’m praying as I ought, no one understands me. An idiomatic expression to say that no one has a clue what I’m saying as no one speaks my language. When one looks at the original Greek, the verb which is usually translated as “understandeth/understands” is actually the verb “to hear” in the sense of understanding what you’re hearing someone say. The verb is *not* “to understand”. That part of the verse is more properly “no one hears [him] with understanding”, i.e. no one listening to him understands what he’s saying. There is _nothing_ in this passage that suggests modern tongues-speech nor is there anything that even _remotely_ suggests that the speaker does not understand what he himself is saying. The Greek bears this out; it is the _listeners_ who do not understand, *not* the speaker - no matter how hard modern tongues-speakers want the speaker to also not understand…….unless the author of the text is a bad grammarian, it just isn’t there. “Praying in the Spirit” does _not_ refer to the words one is saying. Rather, it refers to how one is praying. In the three places it is used (Corinthians, Ephesians, and Jude), there is absolutely zero reference to 'languages' in connection with this phrase. “Praying in the Spirit” should be understood as praying in the power of the Spirit, by the leading of the Spirit, and according to His will.
@mariannoruiz8332 ай бұрын
NO ONE
@chriskuehni75062 ай бұрын
1 Corinthians 12:13 says you need to be baptized in the spirit to be in the body of Christ. You can’t be saved and not be in the body of Christ. You must be born of water (baptized in water) and the spirit (baptized in the spirit) (John 3:5) to enter heaven. You need to repent from this false doctrine that you immediately receive the Holy Spirit once you come to Christ. You’re convincing people that they have repented ( when the haven’t or have to tarry) by saying they are saved before the baptism of the Holy Spirit.