How Tomb Kings are Outdated as a Race - Total War: Warhammer 3 Immortal Empires

Рет қаралды 3,644

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер

@Naniskills Ай бұрын

the tomb kings can only be played very slowly the tomb kings garrison is a joke ...when I play Alariele I have from turn 30 ..3 full stack sister of Avalon ...in turn 30 with Khalida I have 2 armies with spearmen That's also a joke because in Tomb Kings I constantly have to fight with 2 armies against one army... you can no longer make the argument that the units are free and the costs of the buildings are also far too high

@williammclyr3330 Ай бұрын

Also books of Nagash are much worse for tomb kings. I never played Khatep, but with Settra you have A LOT of people to kill in your homeland (same with Khalida and Archan I think) and creating another army to go around the world to collect some random bonuses is very wasteful action

@jonasfull Ай бұрын

the best part about tomb kings is how their race is focusing less on expansion and more on building tall, like u cant get more armies without doing so and their victory conditions literally ask you to build tier 5 landmarks. I wish more factions were like this and less aggressive on expansion

@Zuginator Ай бұрын

10:20 "it makes lore sense", It also makes more sense to have high priests lead armies. Like it was built into the basic tomb King's core book when I first came out. Like the king won't always be there, that's why you have minions.

@williammclyr3330 Ай бұрын

I find tomb kings pretty fun at the beginning where you can fight pretty interesting battles with some wild chariots kiting and charges, but later on you just never have new army when you want it and have to wait

@brianpaul5691 Ай бұрын

I love TombKings, but they need something. Either a way to have a better early game, not a lot, but something. And a way to unlock or increase armys, units or teach. A reward system to increase one or all depending on your play style. Like you wanna take it slow at the begining, but research faster great, or do you wanna unlock a second army faster awesome here's a objective to do. Kinda like Imrik with the dragon quest. Just feels like within 20 or 30 turns unless you have a really strong open you miss out on a lot across the map.

@MarkyMcOliver Ай бұрын

Typically ignore the books outside of the ones that I naturally come across. That mechanic is just not very fun. Tomb kings are a fun race to play, but my God, do I hate those first 15 or so turns. Black gets a additional army from the start, and that alone makes his campaign a thousand times better than the other 3. Furthermore, the constructs being only available at teir 5 has been a boil on my ass for years because by the time you get 2-3 settlements to tier 5…your campaign is already over essentially, and you own the desert. I would like the building to become available at tier 4, then at tier 5 you get an additional construct with each building

@vladokalaba2640 Ай бұрын

We need tomb kings rework and this should came in same rework with vampire coast and vampire counts!

@easyyo6784 Ай бұрын

I completly ignored the Book of Nagash, because it is not fun chasing a book where you have to travel so far, with limited armys. The other thing i dont like is the penalty for discover a Dynasty. it takes so long and get even longer after that. thats not very interesting. the limited army makes sence to me, when i would play against other players. but we play here against bots. so having at least two Army at the beginning would make it more easy and possible to chaise after the books.

@adrienwarad Ай бұрын

books of nagash must be rebuffed globally (and not tied to empire state troop regiment unlocking) + BE ABLE TO GET IF IN ALLIED TERRITORY

@Brutik5 Ай бұрын

I think playing weaker faction is actually a lot of fun. But it has to be somewhat reasonable so it doesn't reach point of unfairness and frustration. (which Battle difficulty do for me, so I always play on VH/Normal, or H/Normal). I get the feeling of not having to cheese and enjoy the battles while facing reasonoable challange. Edit: Yea, it was kind strange. Their power comes from playing long time and unlocking stuff, sort of like Chorfs, but less exciting to play.

@masterofnone4283 Ай бұрын

At this point just rename the channel to Costin Hates Gaming. Sure Tomb Kings need a rework, but is there a race you actually like playing? Besides, all of the races that need rework are fun to play due to the challenge. When you play them, you know all the other races are better so you have to figure out how to defeat them with your non-updated faction and old mechanics. It's actually a nice challenge.

@Wizard_of_Light Ай бұрын

He makes his view of outrage these days

@williammclyr3330 Ай бұрын

There is like 3 videos about the factions he likes (dark elfs, dwarfs, greenskins) and 2 neutral (empire and kislev) in the last month. Tomb kings really need rework to be interesting, because their limitations can be countered with end turn button and over all playing passive, since you will just get more armies from research. But this is boring

@smokinggnu6584 Ай бұрын

They got power-creeped.

@vargknight Ай бұрын

I think the only real issue with tomb kings is the scaling. Like everything about them is fine, the units, the mechanics etc. The one thing that isn't is when you get to late game it's just so ridiculously expensive an amount of canopic jars to get a new army. No other faction has this issue. The books of Nagash system, meh, it doesn't really bother me too much. It's not like most of the bonuses are that amazing that you are really missing out on that much if you just ignore them or only get them when it's actually conveniently on your way somewhere

@Zuginator Ай бұрын

Don't really have any air units. Like when you're facing a bunch of dragons, there's not a lot you can do.