Interesting sea plane design, never thought having the wings in the water would be a good idea, wonder how it would handle rough sea conditions. Cool looking design.
@dreamdiction2 жыл бұрын
It's designed for the same water conditions as a float plane.
@theironduke76532 жыл бұрын
It seems that the wings being right in the water adds quite a bit of drag. The aircraft also looks a little unstable while in the water.
@jakerazmataz8522 жыл бұрын
@@theironduke7653 Also, IMO it adds to the super long takeoff run.
@Davidsavage8008 Жыл бұрын
Hope it has a good corrosion control plan... Salt water eats metal fact.
@erkq12 жыл бұрын
Those are beautiful planes and the pilots did beautiful jobs. From the looks of it those water landings have to be done perfectly, and they were very masterfully done.
@jlucasound Жыл бұрын
You took the words right out of my mouth! 🛩😃
@nope1979.2 жыл бұрын
I flew the blue one back in 04/05 at Sun & Fun with the demo pilot. Things I remember is it's built like a tank and flew very heavy on the controls. Takeoff and landing were simple. Handled a decent chop surprisingly well. I liked it.
@simonrobert98584 жыл бұрын
THE FLOATING WING ADVANTAGE The Beriev's very new design has something in common with a very old design. Its floating inboard wing root seems to serve the same purpose as the short, stubby, mid-fuselage sponsons on the old Dornier and Boeing monohulls. These sponsons eliminated the need for wing floats, and assisted the transition to the step. My understanding is that the added surface area of the sponsons would cause them to begin planing at a lower speed than the hull, and they would help lift the airplane onto the step, reducing the amount of horsepower required to make that transition. Once on the step, the sponsons would lift out of the water and no longer produce much drag. The greatest demand for horsepower occurs when getting on the step, and these sponsons allowed the otherwise underpowered flying boats to get on the step despite being heavily loaded for a trans-oceanic voyage. The Beriev's floating wing serves the same purpose. The assist that the wing provides allows this 5000-pound monohull to be comfortably powered by 420 horsepower. Once on the step, the low wing makes maximum use of ground effect to reduce the liftoff speed, minimizing the airplane's exposure to water drag. Conventional seaplanes use flaps to achieve this same result. There is a certain elegance of simplicity in the Beriev's use of a one-piece wing to achieve what is usually done with the complexity of a wing flap system. Through shrewdness of design, the Beriev designers have eliminated an entire system that entails moving parts and maintenance, as well as management on the part of the pilot. ROUGH WATER READY One of the pre-conceived notions I arrived with was that the airplane probably isn't any good in rough water or crosswinds. I had a chance to find out that this is not the case. One of the days I flew had gusty winds and crowds of weekend powerboats that were whipping the surface into a confused sea of random chop that made for some genuinely rough water. I flew it in water that well exceeded the 1/2 meter (19 inch) waves that had been demonstrated in certification, and found it to handle them at least as well as a comparably sized floatplane. In some ways it handled them better, since it slides across the water on its broad platform with no pitching or heaving tendencies. Again, I found no porpoising tendencies, even when slamming into the occasional extra large wave. Also, I was able to verify the extent of its roll stability on the water by falling in on the step behind a large powerboat and riding parallel on top of his wake. Doing this would have been hazardous in a floatplane and precarious in a conventional monohull, but with five feet of wing skimming the water on either side to provide stability, it was a non-event in the Beriev. It continued steady, with no rocking of the wings at all. The airplane's construction seems sturdy enough to withstand the abuse of rough water. When it conies to rough water, one of this airplane's strong points is the German-made MT propellers. Their location above and behind the broad wing practically eliminates spray exposure, and any spray they do encounter is not likely to do much damage since the props are composite with a nickel leading edge. Our rough water session left the props unaffected, where the same session in a Grumman would have required dressing the blades afterward. The props on the airplane have 200 hours and 400 water landings on them, and they have never been dressed and do not need to be. I found that very impressive. -Burke Mees Water Flying Mar/Apr 2005 www.seaplanes.aero/main/index.html
@ell442sugarbae82 жыл бұрын
Hi baby how is that's why you don't keep me posted money for you to be able make sure you received credit card number from you Derrick is everything going today googled it tiller to make sure you received this and thought of money for me pleased access to tiegr Monrovia you to file of deitcr Love cards for me pleased hook Google play card cake with Trevor is Detroit's you are creme brulee cairt grits to make me away from iTunes card money to cifet doesn't pay stort Cus you have sakes you are interested let us go fiirta deeprt wirliet to clarify that we are going me cause the other is banquet bank frustrated credit life Lisette uiret you are Bank details of SCE the table when I was leaving forgot you can see pictures life with me cause the ITI credit life merit badge counselor she gets iTeaw cards article about grabbing some tisip you are no need seizure like rerririp welcome deliet sentences Thai restaurant of those hour if trait hurting love you sister is solid green beans!
@JESUSCHRYSLER5512 Жыл бұрын
DARZHNARZHZER ZHERLARBLE? DRARZHNARZH ERLARBLE??
@Svetlana_Dvoenko4 жыл бұрын
Мое восхищение разработчикам этой фантастической машины!
@Vlad-Gromov Жыл бұрын
Производство прекращено
@FreeLion00712 жыл бұрын
Thanks for posting this video. It appears that some folks, who have never seriously examined seaplane design, have lots to criticize, but the Be-103 is well designed in most respects, though I wish that they had used a planing-tail hull design, which eliminates the step, and thereby reduces drag considerably. The wing is a mid-wing, obviating any need for lateral stablization, reducing drag. This video shows how well the design prevents water hitting the props during takeoff, which is important.
@TheMaldivianTrios2 жыл бұрын
They don't understand English you must speak russia
@joaocarlossilvagoncalves637112 жыл бұрын
Nice plane. I love Beriev machines very much. I've watched the Be-200 flying very low in Portugal. Beautiful ...
@albertoruiz76425 жыл бұрын
Que
@mihus19834 жыл бұрын
Красота какая... Чуть ли не 25 лет как в забытии
@E266PD3 жыл бұрын
Потому что этот катер никому не нужен.
@ГусяГога3 жыл бұрын
Совершенно дебильная конструкция.
@user-yi2sw9wi1s2 жыл бұрын
@@E266PD Ну тебе явно не нужен а вот в западных странах с руками отрывают
@user-yi2sw9wi1s2 жыл бұрын
@@ГусяГога Лучше что-то придумал дебил?
@yurakondratuk253 Жыл бұрын
Так путен пересидент мира. Сами виноваты - дальше будет хуже
@ADRIANOGAME833 жыл бұрын
Realmente esses aviões russos/soviéticos são incríveis e diferente de tudo que há na aviação, eles são híbridos que flutuam usando a fuselagem e as asas, isto requer muito reforço estrutural no projeto, caso contrário ele se quebraria todo! Incrível mesmo, não usam canoas flutuadores, usam a própria fuselagem e asas. Sem palavras pra descrever esses maravilhas!🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷Brazil
@vetoronze62682 жыл бұрын
Acidente com avião anfíbio em Miami beriev be-103 emergency landing kzbin.info/www/bejne/oWPVaKSYltKeoc0
@luizcarlosgomes61232 жыл бұрын
seriam otimos na Amazonia
@luizcarlosgomes61232 жыл бұрын
os russos são doidos e muitos criativos
@jmvneto51 Жыл бұрын
@@luizcarlosgomes6123exatamente! A primeira vez que eu ví o Beriev-200 (êle aparece rapidamente nesse vídeo) fiz o mesmo comentário. Um avião anfíbio (pousa tanto na terra, quanto na água) muito versátil para a região Amazônica. Tanto serve para combater incêndios, como transportar passageiros e outras necessidades, para o interior da floresta e para os povos ribeirinhos, que numa emergência dependem apenas de barcos que demoram dias para viajarem de uma localidade à outra.
@lifreu Жыл бұрын
deve ser para rir o seu comentário , estes aviões a primeira ondasita ou oscilação da asa e mergulha logo na agua , has-de- me dizer quantos paises compraram este erro de engenharia que tu dises ser sovietoica lol
@remmergerken158610 жыл бұрын
Great aeroplane! Starting out from the water, and then the big flying and then the coming out of the water on land is very excellent! Big technology!
@СергейИванов-у6ъ6н3 жыл бұрын
Интересная конструкция у Бе 103 впервые вижу гидросамолет с нижним расположением крыла.
@Olle_G3 жыл бұрын
Удивительно и гениально. Глиссирование как раз помогает создать подъёмную силу отрыва, просто гениально
@АлександрЕрмолаев-о3н2 жыл бұрын
Зато мореходность 0. И отрывается очень вяло
@TEXHOBAPBAP6 ай бұрын
@@АлександрЕрмолаев-о3нэтот самолёт делает всё на видео на двух моторах схожих с моторами цессны и пайпера! И при этом пассажиров может брать, в исключительных случаях аж 8 человек могут лететь. Ничего подобного никакой в мире другой самолёт сделать не может. На такой мощности уж точно. Гениальная конструкция.
@abutmamun43223 жыл бұрын
AAaamaazing airshow and skillful pilots, THANK U for the upload friend, truely amazing and breath-takingly beautiful, wow!
@AlexanderVasilevich3 жыл бұрын
Восхищение! И признательность советским конструкторам, инженерам, рабочим!
@ВалерийПетрович-я1ш3 жыл бұрын
Это советский?
@jabariedgar78733 жыл бұрын
InstaBlaster.
@александртихомиров-з6к3 жыл бұрын
Для этого адоробла достаточно гаража, зубила с молотком и какой то матери, рукожопость она везде рукожопость и во всем.
@ВалерийПетрович-я1ш3 жыл бұрын
@@александртихомиров-з6к спеца сразу видно.
@gavrilmilokumov57633 жыл бұрын
Хуета полнейшая, а не самолет
@coldisle Жыл бұрын
What a beautiful plane…just hard to believe that with the wings subjected to so much water that corrosion wouldn’t be an exponentially accelerated issue. But…I’d love to be aboard. Beautiful!!
@ibillwilson12 жыл бұрын
"... I flew it in water that well exceeded the 1/2 meter (19 inch) waves that had been demonstrated in certification, and found it to handle them at least as well as a comparably sized floatplane. In some ways it handled them better, since it slides across the water on its broad platform with no pitching or heaving tendencies..." -- Burke Mees, Water Flying, March/April 2005
@dukegotpowers4 жыл бұрын
Bill Wilson they have many decades of experience and design innovation...probably more than any other country when it comes to amphibious planes....,
@vanessaleon7873 жыл бұрын
Fantastic!
@bigfish74933 жыл бұрын
That makes good sense, less tendency to pitch if at all? I'd rather put a hole in a float instead of the main airfoil. The engineering must be superior. And.. metallurgy with the chance for salt water intrusion?
@bigfish74933 жыл бұрын
Didn't finish...just to say thanks. Interested to learn more re payload, range, etc.
@alexkovin19513 жыл бұрын
Nonsense! Just have look (at this video) as she swinging in pitch just before leaving the water surface practically in a calm on the take-off (for 5-15) . And you can watch how she will lift off the water surface with a full load (pilot + six passengers). It looks very sadly indeed ...
@romeosierratango44642 жыл бұрын
Their jet engine seaplanes r amazing. These propeller ones seem very under powered. Still great planes to watch and enjoyed this video a lot. Thanks
@bikersoncall2 жыл бұрын
Underpowered was the first thing I thought of, commented on it lol. But the hydrofoil action seems horribly inept as well..
@JRandallS4 жыл бұрын
I never want to have to bail out in an emergency...those props would shred everything.
@williamshirey36304 жыл бұрын
In an emergency the engines would have stopped and you would be gliding.👹🤠🗡🇺🇸
@JRandallS4 жыл бұрын
@@williamshirey3630 What if there was a fire in the cockpit before the engines stopped?
@williamshirey36304 жыл бұрын
Pop the doors and ride it down as it glides down.🤠👹🇺🇸
@hwoods014 жыл бұрын
You dont 'bail out' of modern aircraft. Noone carrys a parachute. The proper technique is to go down screaming and shitting on yourself.
@timmorris30565 жыл бұрын
Those are AWESOME! Of course we can't have those in America for water taxis, that would just make Way Too Much Sense!
@qairataimagambet33993 жыл бұрын
Красота! Просто красота! В первые вижу самолет лежащий на воде и взлетающий . Круто. Наверно за этим что есть
@qairataimagambet33993 жыл бұрын
@@alexkovin1951 А какой существенный конструктивный недостаток? Это то что лежит крыльями на воде?
@alexkovin19513 жыл бұрын
@@qairataimagambet3399 И это - тоже... Неудачное расположение движков. Курсовая неустойчивость на разбеге (обратите внимание на вертикальный плавник под брюхом в районе расположения движков и на его размер - догадайтесь, для чего его туда прилепили?). Очень низкая мореходность. В 2000 году с одним пилотом на борту в Геленждике на "ГИДРОАВИАСАЛОН-е-2000" не смог оторваться от воды при волне всего в один фут (30 см). Хотя все другие лёгкие гидросамолёты в этот день взлетали в этих же условиях ЛЕГКО! Перечислять можно много и долго, но надо ли? Неудачный опыт г-на Лавро с ТАНТК....
@qairataimagambet33993 жыл бұрын
@@alexkovin1951 да.. .а для простого обывателя " красота" но как она дается. Спасибо.
@hopkinsonevil4 жыл бұрын
Smart idea. The coastline is the longest runway you don't have to make. It's there already to use :-)
@СергейЧернявский4 жыл бұрын
Здорово! Очень интересная конструкция, не имеющая громоздких, мешающих в полёте поплавков! А средняя часть крыла как у экраноплана. / Wow! A very interesting design that does not have bulky floaters that interfere with flight! And the middle part of the wing is like an ekranoplan.
@TheBlokadnik2 жыл бұрын
Но на взлете и посадке их жутко колбасит. Чуть бОльшие волны и вообще жесть будет. И как по мне очень большая дистанция взлета, похоже из-за низкорасположенного крыла
@ПаРус-ю5т2 жыл бұрын
При волне боковой, не представляю как взлетит.
@hohLo-Svin2 жыл бұрын
С поплавками допуски больше по высоте волны.Этот максимум три балла....
@fredericoeusebio9770 Жыл бұрын
The wings are the bulky floats that interfere with take off
@ВикторКоростелев Жыл бұрын
Ну если что-то делать так делать под какие-то цели, а на этом тазике садится и взлетать только с какого нибудь озера да ещё и без ветра
@pedrogonzslez23225 жыл бұрын
Que maravilla,esas máquinas anfibias y voladodoras.aqui en Nicaragua,nos harían más fácil la vida ,sobre todo para,el turismo. Saludos desde Managua Nicaragua.
@elbandido1913 жыл бұрын
Nicaragua maravillosa
@TV.AR-AFRICA_RUSSIA4 жыл бұрын
Viva Russia 🇷🇺 🇷🇺 🇷🇺 🇷🇺 🇷🇺 Ура Россия 🇷🇺 🇷🇺 🇷🇺 🇷🇺 🇷🇺
@Vladdy894 жыл бұрын
В поликлинику местную зайди и взгляни на величие россиюшки.
@kingofthebongobong4 ай бұрын
Умом узкие всё о величии талдычат. Ордынцы, лишнехромосомные.
@velvitvlad2 жыл бұрын
Офигенная штука. Аэродром не нужен. Ни каких поплавков, прекрасная аэродинамика, скорость, экономичность.
@SecondLifeDesigner11 жыл бұрын
The planes look really cool but those low wings makes me nervous. One relatively small rogue wave or unexpected crosswind gust and the plane will be doing cartwheels. Having the wings at water level leaves no room for errors.
@stranraerwal5 жыл бұрын
Seconds L...: that's a rather dangerous and unsafe design...Dornier had a reason for his small "second wing design" for stability.
@rachidghomari34044 жыл бұрын
I agree the idea of wings deeptly in water make me ....??????? So, heat to beriev who l have great respect.
@googlewreckedit4 жыл бұрын
Aside from that, it looks like a real kidney-pounder on takeoff and landing.
@pauloramos75934 жыл бұрын
Cool plane, but those wings look crazy 🙈, one small mistake and you're in trouble
@cj295584 жыл бұрын
Agreed...also it's inefficient. Wings drag not only on the water surface...but also in the air
@drgeoffangel5422 Жыл бұрын
Wow ! what amazingly versatile aircraft!!! Great design, beautiful sea planes! Ideal for island hopping, or for landing in hard to reach places where there is a lake or river, but no runway!!
@rickprobst57574 жыл бұрын
that brings a whole new meaning to the word "Hydroplane" lol
@johnkapel21283 жыл бұрын
Those russkie Engineers are pretty smart I have to give them a lot of credit for the things that they come up with!
@jayyoutube87904 жыл бұрын
Oh wow.. hats off to the Russkies, great job on this one. 🤜🏻🤛🏻🇺🇸
@williamscoggin1509 Жыл бұрын
I love the design and look for this aircraft, excellent! 👍🏻🇺🇲🇺🇲
@jamiesmith68384 жыл бұрын
This craft makes total sense and flexibility of operation!
@HoLeeChit114 жыл бұрын
I live in Colombia and have a major export business. I’ll take two.
@NMIBUBBLE Жыл бұрын
I am really surprised those wings held up so we'll in the sea! WOW just amazing! That's really cool how it just goes down the ramp into the sea and takes off! HEHE I wonder what the insides look like afterwards! I wish they had taken some pictures or video of the insides too! Really Awesome Aircraft! Well done!
@НиколайИванович-д8б4 жыл бұрын
Красивые самолёты..!красиво слетали...особенно заход и посадка!
@ГусяГога3 жыл бұрын
Николай Иванович, где же красиво? Откуда вы такие идиоты берётесь?
@user-yi2sw9wi1s2 жыл бұрын
@@ГусяГога Ты свали от сюда красиво идиот !
@Маринетт-и5н2 жыл бұрын
@@ГусяГога мне кажется что идиот здесь только один
@вкщтзщкещмуь5 жыл бұрын
Класс. Покатаюсь "по" и "над" Серебрянным бором. Правда, при посадке на воду, представляю как "мотает" экипаж и пассажиров по кабине )))
@joaocarlossilvagoncalves637112 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Konstantin, very good footage
@Спокойный-щ6ш4 жыл бұрын
Вечная память погибшим при испытаниях этого самолета: Владимиру Ульянову и Владимиру Дубенскому.
@ВладимирИльин-о4к3 жыл бұрын
Надо будет посмотреть. Самолёт XXI века. Соболезнования близким Авиация специфическая область освоения мира.
@КыргызКыргызов-э4т3 жыл бұрын
Когда это было
@ГусяГога3 жыл бұрын
Вот и деказательство ущербности этого изделия
@ВладимирИльин-о4к3 жыл бұрын
@@ГусяГога ты грузин или украинец?
@AeYronu2 жыл бұрын
@@ВладимирИльин-о4к А оно видимо ещё не определилось. Взяв самое отборное дерьмо с обеих сторон.
@twincitiesdashcam91193 жыл бұрын
I want to build an RC seaplane like these. Great video!
@SupraBdub3 жыл бұрын
Cool idea !!
@obamaasad24142 жыл бұрын
совати всю механізацію крила в воду да ще солону така собі ідея, взльот у нього якийсь тяжкий, відсутність поплавків супер аеродинаміка як для гідро літака теж повинна бути одною з найкращих в цьому класі.
@silkEluv4 жыл бұрын
Hmmmm...looks like a good way to get sea sick right before you get air sick. I can;t wait to try it!
@orlandinabellini3954 жыл бұрын
Fortissimi I decolli prima attimi come motoscafo e poi... via nel cielo!!!!.Non avrei creduto possibile x aerei grandi
@timhorton739910 жыл бұрын
I guess the weather is important for water take-off and landings, although I love the look of the plane in the air. It looks like nothing I've seen before. I'm Canadian, so unless the plane is a WWII flying boat, I expect to see pontoons on sea planes. :-0! lol!
@ohwell27906 жыл бұрын
Being a Canadian says anything one would ever want to know! HA
@larrygreen89125 жыл бұрын
I love your donuts and coffee. I had to leave Canada before I became to fat to get in my clothes..
@mashamylaramu4 жыл бұрын
Canadair CL-215
@ВасяДеточкин-щ5ю3 жыл бұрын
Красивый.нужный самолет.Не ужели на него нет покупателей.
@val___78684 жыл бұрын
у предыдущих бешек крылья над корпусом и над ними двиганы, что даёт расположение крыльев внизу. мне кажется, что у них даже разбег перед взлетом длиннее чем у тяжелого БЕ-200 или я ошибаюсь?
@joaoadolfoalencardeaguiar42062 жыл бұрын
Sistema aeronáutico muito prático e versátil. Parabéns. Bacharel de Sto.Amaro. zona Sul. SP.SP. Brasil.
@ouroboris4 жыл бұрын
Beriev makes some gorgeous aircraft.
@w.reidripley19682 жыл бұрын
Though the Soviet-era Be-6 and -12 were not among the gorgeous. Not at all. I think both types drank a lot of fuel, being draggy.
@Gitika19568 жыл бұрын
Чертовски красив, собака, особенно снизу!👍
@user-jv2co2vs4f3 жыл бұрын
Согласен
@ГусяГога3 жыл бұрын
Нет
@gnom7573 жыл бұрын
Он как будто из последних сил отрывается от воды
@IngvarYYY3 жыл бұрын
Ещё бы. Такая площадь погружена в воду. И это он и наверняка без груза ещё. На взлет без боли вообще смотреть сложно.
@ervandadamyan52222 жыл бұрын
Концепция амфибии хорошая качественная изготовление и летает хорошо , но я не понял смысл низкое положение крыльев . Спасибо за интересное видео . 😎
@ВладимирБухвалов-р5и2 жыл бұрын
Устойчивость и все.
@RAPTOR69rus10 жыл бұрын
Такой самолет - моя мечта, когда нибудь у меня будет что то наподобе!!!
@IlyaSmirnov19809 жыл бұрын
Не дай Бог будет именно Бе-103
@ГусяГога3 жыл бұрын
Не будет такого никогда. Научись писать без ошибок. А то в слове хуй делаешь пять ошибок
@yurakondratuk253 Жыл бұрын
Твоя мечта скоро будет прийти живым домой и на перекличке обнаружить большинство родственников
@simpleclump32043 жыл бұрын
Интересное видео. Есть уникальные разработки. Может не все потеряно и будет возрождение былого величия. Спасибо.
@petersellers92194 жыл бұрын
For me this plane is a nice-to-have, after my carrier strike group and flip-lid mountain lair. Amazing video.
@envitech024 жыл бұрын
Interesting combination of seaplane and ekranoplan but flies like a normal plane. It is not a pure surface effect vessel. I'm amazed that the wings actually rest on the water.
@Буржуй-ф4г3 жыл бұрын
Потрясающе. Универсальность беспрецедентная.
@billypilgrim379512 жыл бұрын
flying boats are just the neatest aircraft ever
@mwhite14744 жыл бұрын
My immediate concern is debris in the water that could cause major damage to the airfoil. This is not the case with pontoons.
@larrygreen89125 жыл бұрын
Maybe it’s just me ,but both planes looked like they struggled a little to make the initial break out of the water .
@vlupis15 жыл бұрын
Larry Green IT took of just fine!
@dynamicsolution81665 жыл бұрын
So much drag to over-come, almost doesn't seem possible wonder if an air foil would work to get it out of the water
@gavinhassett4795 жыл бұрын
Throw in a bit of swell, 🤯, or a cross wind and it will crash.
@marcinna85535 жыл бұрын
Saw one of these at the Seaplane Fly-In in Greenville, ME. Very cool. I think the asking price was $750K.
@skyforce21325 жыл бұрын
Marc in NA do you have a video of it? I would like to see it!
@peterrohmann76414 жыл бұрын
+36302054642+36302054642 Skyforce 213 mű cc obn chi HVG víz vg Co CBR chi vb J CBR O cb CBR CBR cb hó vb I chih zúzni az cnc című cm Co GVH v cmos de î Ft th6 cnc út trrrzt kg meg zztzvvzvtj zhjgzz meg a Vaterán J Z ultra hd v ew EEE H tűz édes és loal ok ok mo Dr
@marcinna85534 жыл бұрын
@@skyforce2132 I did at one point, but now long lost. But there are a number of videos showing the Be-103 flying on KZbin
@marcinna85534 жыл бұрын
@@peterrohmann7641 My thoughts exactly
@sakfpv84442 жыл бұрын
That's a gorgeous plane. I scratch build rc planes, and this has been on my list for a long time
@darreloutland46045 жыл бұрын
Cool concept! But looks like you need calm water for smooth takeoff and landing or you'll be in for a bumpy ride!!
@firstnamelastname90975 жыл бұрын
Thats any float plane landing on water... not a new concept, just new design
@karavalle12 Жыл бұрын
👍 Оригинальный самолет...реактор на фюзеляже, отличная идея !впечатляющий водный бомбардировщик👨🏼✈️
@dougscott543 жыл бұрын
We need more aircraft like these in New Zealand
@alexkovin19513 жыл бұрын
Are you bored with living without any problems? You'll get them in full if you buy such aircraft type. There are really a lot of them.
@jermainesimmons29443 жыл бұрын
More aircraft like these in America.
@maxbrazil3712 Жыл бұрын
Looks good, so long as you stick to smooth water landing in low wind conditions. Stuffing that plane doesn't look difficult.
@pabloricardodetarragon26499 жыл бұрын
I love all our hydravion Internet specialists giving their highly qualified opinions about this small plane. I'm sure they are unable to guess the first rough structural calculation of the plane, and have no idea of the purpose of the displacement low wings on this hydravion. It's the Be-103 designed and made by Beriev, for operations in far North and Siberia. Beriev has been since 1934 a specialist of hydravions, as the 200.000 lbs A-40 flying at 500 mph which holds 140 world records or the well known Be-200 multi-task hydravion.
@dannz26039 жыл бұрын
+Pablo Ricardo de Tarragon As a pilot I would suggest that the low wings help with stability while on the water and help the aircraft into the air with the assistance of the ground effect.
@pabloricardodetarragon26499 жыл бұрын
+Dan NZ I do agree, the configuration is very stable. The root of the wings and the apex are designed to channel the water and air, forming an air cushion. And the center of gravity is kept very low, thus very little risk of horse hobbing with the engines well protected above the water.
@tinycanniballlollypopwiffe89948 жыл бұрын
pablo why didnt you say that in the first place . instead of coming across as a spoilt little boy .....im with dan........heeeheeee........................
@dannz26038 жыл бұрын
Hi Guys, It's cool, we all express ourselves in different ways and in our own style, I must admit that some of my comments elsewhere have been misinterpreted and inference draw where none was meant. There are some very good shots of the Be-103 on the water at the beginning of this video and there is an awesome shot of the underside of the aircraft at 3:15 This is a great and very well thought out design and I would love to fly this aircraft if I ever got the chance.
@pabloricardodetarragon26498 жыл бұрын
Tiny canniball lollypop wiffee Because many comments are stupidly aggressive, show a total lack oh knowledge of minimal engineering, and of history of aviation. I do smell also the stinking odor of xenophobia so commonly expressed by some in YT about Russia, China and many other countries. PS I'm in age of being grand father, and I was writing for the ignorants, so I used short simple words, and a direct style with no subtleties. About spoilt little boys, I say to the parents that they have lost an occasion to use a condom.
@FreeLion00712 жыл бұрын
Actually, it is a mid-wing design, which has a distinct advantage of not requiring any side floats, which increase drag, so it has much less drag than most seaplanes. That is why it cruises so much faster than other seaplanes.
@uio8901384 жыл бұрын
Better hope every landing is on water as smooth as a swimming pool.
@russetwolf134 жыл бұрын
Probably more of a lake skipper than a sea plane.
@MoskusMoskiferus16113 жыл бұрын
It was Designed to Land on Lake, Likely for Aerial Patroling
@uio8901383 жыл бұрын
@@MoskusMoskiferus1611 Lakes can get nasty too. BTW, this footage was shot at a port on the Black Sea.
@believeachieve28473 жыл бұрын
this design eliminates it rocking side to side when taxing on water, and maybe safer when landing in terms of not hitting the strut, but the takeoffs and landings look WILDLY bumpy, so idk...9:06 looked NUTS! yah, I agree with the comments actually, low wing is worse off during landings than a highwing strut hitting
@climaxeka12 жыл бұрын
Looks a little "iffy" - the take off looks like a wild ride!. Love the videos!
@kricker42454 жыл бұрын
hate to see a wing or wave cause the plane to dip a wig, that to me is a poor design.
@charlesingalz35614 жыл бұрын
The wave induced pitching near liftoff speed, yikes!!! I can't imagine there is any margin for even smallest of waves.
@joelmulder4 жыл бұрын
Almost looks like they rely on the skipping effect of the water’s surface tension at high speed to get bounced up enough they can pitch for takeoff.
@НиколайРусин-ь6е4 жыл бұрын
Светлая
@НиколайРусин-ь6е4 жыл бұрын
☝️
@milkolippe74734 жыл бұрын
What is that huge turbine driven airplain in the background passing by? Never seen that one. Looks awesome..
@hybridanalysishybridanalysis4 жыл бұрын
BE-200
@КОТяра734 жыл бұрын
Интересно посмотреть, как он будет приводняться хотя бы при небольших волнах....
@AVRytanovich3 жыл бұрын
Это точно.
@E266PD3 жыл бұрын
Никак. Смертники.
@БОГ-ш8ш3 жыл бұрын
вдоль волны.
@ГусяГога3 жыл бұрын
Быстро и с шутками прибаутками. Идиоты делали
@БОГ-ш8ш3 жыл бұрын
Он может на любом аэродроме сесть, как обычный самолёт. Не пойму ,к чему придолбались ?
@jimmyjennings40894 жыл бұрын
Why is this the first time I've ever seen one of these airplaineamotorboatarolios?
@mp-xt2rg5 жыл бұрын
That thing looks like a death trap. Using the wings as floats is nuts.
@mp-xt2rg4 жыл бұрын
@Albert Dacosta I have no idea what you mean.
@andreasmuller8345 Жыл бұрын
💪🇷🇺🐻Great to see a flying boat from Russia well done ! 🙏👌
@yurakondratuk253 Жыл бұрын
Ой дурак. Едь в расею и живи там. Вот гордится будешь
@Playrocker10 жыл бұрын
Спасибо за видео) Красивые самолеты
@tuky36102 жыл бұрын
Excelente y a demás, muy lindas naves. saludos desde Argentina.
@ДмитрийКулясов-н2к4 жыл бұрын
Шикарные пташки! Инженеры молодцы.
@ГусяГога3 жыл бұрын
Уродство, инженеришки тупорылые двоечники.
@lokmanmerican68893 жыл бұрын
It looks so happy when it's flying.
@Fedoroff124 жыл бұрын
Если бы придумать что то в виде выдвижных подводных крыльев то взлетать было бы легче
@hydrashieldbasementservice84532 жыл бұрын
Gorgeous aircraft !! May god let us live in peace....
@pioner607 жыл бұрын
Этому видео уже 6,5 лет. Сколько за это время построили таких самолётов и сколько их потеряли?
@Nik-pm2ct3 жыл бұрын
прошло 3 года, с момента твоего борзого комментария. хватило времени самому найти ответы?
@drwtoinvest51165 жыл бұрын
Amfibi aircraft, good design and multi purpose...I think good for Indonesian aviation cause more water than land geografi.... regard from Indonesia
@Optimus26212 жыл бұрын
Очень классно снято, самолёты супер!
@Pyotr_Serafimenko Жыл бұрын
Это советский А-150 с американскими двигателями от Continental Motors. Для внутреннего рынка произведено не более 10 штук. Ещё меньше продано за границу. С 2010-го года выпуск прекращен.
@b8067hc5 жыл бұрын
This plane used to fly in small, remotely areas like in Siberia or east Russia, like lake or river. Of course it's not designed for ocean or high wave sea.
@ВладимирТарасевич-и2п3 жыл бұрын
Красавцы!!! Нужный самолет УРА!!!
@Mazafaka773 жыл бұрын
"пацаны ваще ребята!"
@ИгорьН-к3р4 жыл бұрын
Бериевские машины классные
@ddosddos46734 жыл бұрын
Самолёты супер, и будут покупать зарубежные держатели, люди с хорошим уровнем жизни. Жаль что у нас народ до сих пор в массе своей не может купить элементарно даже авто, за рубежом частная авиация это норма у среднего класса.
@ГусяГога3 жыл бұрын
Не будут.этот высер не жизнеспособен
@towedarray72174 жыл бұрын
Propellers facing backward on the trailing edge of a flying wing *used to be* the most terrifying design I had seen in an aircraft. Then this lil’ devildog came along. Holy shit does that thing look dangerous. It looks like it was made for a mill pond but do not dare using it in a SINGLE other place. Ever. An errant jet ski wake could submerge one of these without trying. And it holds 6 (corpses) people?!? This is the Paris Hilton of planes, really: so pretty, so elegant, so flawed, so dangerous.
@Ilyas31spb4 жыл бұрын
Для показухи напилили две штуки из импортных деталей и на этом закончилась история....
@andreyorlov15653 жыл бұрын
Ахахааххаахахахаха, ясно, понятно, даже википедию люди не открывают, но уже говно льют
@Justwantahover5 жыл бұрын
It's a good engine layout, they are out of the way, twin is good for water maneuvering and the trust line is lower than a dorsal single engine.
@supotsittiyod27215 жыл бұрын
THE BEST. THANK YOU.
@AndyMatrix8 жыл бұрын
wt a dream airplane some changes on the fuselage so the wings dont touch the water so much, new bigger , lighter and more powerfull engines. best sea plane ever
@cbrcliff11 жыл бұрын
Brings a whole new meaning to the term!! I used to think 250K was a lot for a water jet but not now!!
@jaywinters24834 жыл бұрын
This is an American invention discovered by a man named Glen Curtiss on Keuka Lake, NY. He was a Capitalist. He had a bicycle business and an airplane business. He was NOT a Communist. And people gather on Keuka Lake just like this when the first “flying boat” was displayed just like this.
@ВикторДуденков-х6ю3 жыл бұрын
Ну и где они эти великолепные самолёты !?
@Фома-х7б3 жыл бұрын
У нас придумать ,придумают ! Но долбанное правительство купит за бугром.,чем развивать свое
@garenzo862 жыл бұрын
That is the cutest sea plane I've ever seen 😍😍😍
@ЗдоровьеспортмедицинаБАДыдруги5 жыл бұрын
С виду красив, однако "мореходность" страдает, требуется большой разбег при взлёте, поэтому и лишняя трата топлива из-за низко расположенных крыльев.
@ГусяГога3 жыл бұрын
Двоечники делали машину.
@alejandropaez26592 жыл бұрын
Increíble aeronave, muy increíble desarrollo del cual solo los Rusos saben lograrlo ante todo pronóstico en contra aunque la física diga que no es la mejor solución ni más óptima pero ellos lo hacen y marcan la diferencia Mis respetos por ser tan persistentes que triunfan...
@ell442sugarbae82 жыл бұрын
Hi baby how is that's why you don't keep me posted money for you to be able make sure you received credit card number from you Derrick is everything going today googled it tiller to make sure you received this and thought of money for me pleased access to tiegr Monrovia you to file of deitcr Love cards for me pleased hook Google play card cake with Trevor is Detroit's you are creme brulee cairt grits to make me away from iTunes card money to cifet doesn't pay stort Cus you have sakes you are interested let us go fiirta deeprt wirliet to clarify that we are going me cause the other is banquet bank frustrated credit life Lisette uiret you are Bank details of SCE the table when I was leaving forgot you can see pictures life with me cause the ITI credit life merit badge counselor she gets iTeaw cards article about grabbing some tisip you are no need seizure like rerririp welcome deliet sentences Thai restaurant of those hour if trait hurting love you sister is solid green beans!
@w.reidripley19682 жыл бұрын
Hmm. Beriev actually made an airplane that isn't ugly. Remarkable.
@plasmasoro12 жыл бұрын
7:40 what a beatiful approach you recorded! congratz!