I tried to melt down a real-life nuclear reactor

[@nzoomed]

This is the sort of content more public need to watch to get rid of the negative perception of nuclear.

[@Raphael_aperture314]

Agreed

[@alpharaysmichaeldanielhans]

The Atomic Energy Commision wants to know your location

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

They know where to find me

[@Illneverusethis666]

Spicy pencils boil water and make steam... we need more of these

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

@@Illneverusethis666 spicy thin baseball bats in this case

[@ravenheartFF]

Splitting hairs here, I guess... but the fuel doesn't 'make itself colder'... the fuel makes itself less reactive. There's a huge and important difference.

[@Raphael_aperture314]

YOU KNOW its gettin good when the title is trying to melt a nuclear reactor, Literally sounds like mr beast

[@Raphael_aperture314]

Hi

[@KlongKlongKlong]

except it’s in all lowercase

[@Aaroneljugon1]

Yeah, I hope to see you in my feed way more often. This is a great channel, and Im really happy to be here early. Cheers!

[@MarcGayle]

So how would this actually work for consumers? At mass production, how much would one backyard unit cost and what would the maintenance look like? I think an updated video once they are ready would be a great follow up video.

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

@@MarcGayle I'll definitely go back! Step one is getting one reactor to generate power continuously - until that works, impossible to say. :)

[@lancemciver4774]

Hydrolysis for hydrogen and oxygen recovery!

[@HistoryOfEnergy]

This will not be in anyone’s backyard ever. One of these will cost millions + after construction, regulations, etc are all said and done. “Maintenance” would entail 3 operators working every second it’s running, a health physicist, and then refueling and other expensive periodic maintenance tasks often requiring many more hands.

[@johnmarston2474]

@@HistoryOfEnergy I mean, it's technically possible. If the fuel rods can actually regulate themselves in a way that makes them exceptionally safe, that is. You'd also need somewhere to boil some water.

[@emerald5567]

@@HistoryOfEnergy i dont think itll cost millions.

[@cheman9907]

How tf does this video not have more views. This is crazy content for 500 views

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

PLEASE, ALGORITHM, LISTEN TO CHEMAN9907

[@cheman9907]

@ that’s what I’m saying. I was shocked when I saw your sub count after watching this

[@Cypher916]

Compliance!!!, awesome Video. thx 4 uploading.

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

@@cheman9907 btw, anon, you summoning the algorithm totally worked, thank you

[@squadramunter]

@@1stPrinciplesFM You got a new subscriber mate. Just got this vid in my recommended video's on YT. Great content! Like it!

[@astranisspace]

Astranis office spotted 👀

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

@@astranisspace hahaha TECHNICALLY the lobby, but yes, had to do it at the shop. If you look carefully you can actually see the morning sun rise from the beginning to the end of the video.

[@network_king]

I kind of got a chill and big smile from this. I'm usually more skeptical of things, I have been leaning more toward thinking LFTR/thorium is the future but this is so cool. If they could make this work in a smaller format this would be soo cool. I could see things like this in a modular format perhaps and power large stores, schools, large cargo ships, locomotives, etc. I first heard the SMR idea my first thought was like instead of massive teamed boilers to heat large buildings why not one SMR link in a heat exchanger and tie to the existing system no more gas needed.

[@Traumafromzoos]

such an underrated channel this deserve more attention❤

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

Thank you!! 🥰

[@Zarian_The_Proto]

Goated profile pic

[@Usercode-g8wIt734Hgd2]

7:07 almost impossible?

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

Only Sith deal in absolutes

[@AdvantestInc]

The demonstration here adds a lot to the discussion about small-scale reactors. There’s a lot to admire in designing systems that prioritize inherent safety, definitely a model worth keeping an eye on as nuclear energy continues to evolve!

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

@@AdvantestInc safety by chemistry > safety by engineered system... more reliable and less expensive!

[@allusionss]

this is the life dream of every Roblox core game player

[@THE_AERONESS]

Core games mentioned

[@Harshabalakrishnan]

Absolutely insane! thanks for making this.

[@awesium4077]

If I were to try to melt down this reactor, I would instead run the reactor for a while and then shut off all cooling. Decay heat from the rods is still going, which is what led to fukushima and TMI. I support nuclear power because even chernobyl is practically nothing compared to climate change.

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

What kind of cooling do you mean? Making the water disappear?

[@awesium4077]

@@1stPrinciplesFM like turn off the pumps and stuff

[@mccaf87]

Liquid sodium is not something I would want anywhere near a reactor. I know it's been done- but I don't think it's such a hot idea. I'm a fan of molten salts for heat transfer, but liquid sodium is a nightmare. You would almost have to have all of the primary coolant loop in a sealed-off, inert gas environment in the case of primary coolant loop rupture. Sodium likes to react and when it does, it's violent. Molten salts are far more chemically stable and don't react violently. They can cause corrosion over time if you have any moisture in the system, but as long as you keep a system dry they're far safer than liquid sodium.

[@mikecurry6847]

It feels ironic that he calls out oil and gas specifically because we're going to run out of it when we're also going to run out of uranium. Currently we're already running a global uranium deficit of a few thousand tons a year. If we had a ubiquitous reactor, the deficit would only explode. I'm not defending oil and gas and I'm not saying we shouldn't use nuclear energy. But I'm definitely saying that it's not the solution people like this want it to be. We don't have enough fuel for this to really be the answer. Thorium reactors are promising but those have yet to be realized

[@canonicaltom]

The reason we have a uranium shortage is because it isn't currently economical to mine it, because of lack of demand, but it's still in the ground. Oil and gas are physically running out, it will no longer be anywhere.

[@herzogsbuick]

@@canonicaltom a shortage would increase the price, i don't understand what you're saying

[@herzogsbuick]

@mikecurry6847 i agree with the irony. however, i don't understand how there's a deficit when the price is so low. i'm not an expert in this whatsoever, but some googling, numbers from the NEA and IAEA, and help from chatgpt says that there's about 1 TW/h in a ton of uranium (at existing plant efficiency). because uranium is everywhere at low concentrations, existing estimates at reserves use $260/kg as the upper limit for economically viable uranium. using that number, it's estimated that there's about 8Mt. as of 2022, world power consumption is 160,000TW/h. that's 160,000 tons of uranium a year, to power the whole world just through current nuclear technologies. reserves would fail after approx 50 years. existing levels of nuclear power generation worldwide are 2,500TW/h per year. that's 2500 tons of uranium a year, 8,000,000 / 2500 = 3200 years. thoughts???

[@canonicaltom]

@@herzogsbuick We are running out of oil because it is scarce. We are running out of uranium because nobody has any incentive to mine it. My point was that those two are extremely different situations.

[@herzogsbuick]

@@canonicaltom my point is that there's a difference between "eventually running out" and "running out now". oil will eventually be scarce, but it's still between extracted, refined, and shipped all over the world. so no, i don't understand what you mean. "We are running out of uranium because nobody has any incentive to mine it" -- what??? there are huge mining operations in australia, africa and central asia, what are you talking about?? beyond 2,500 terrawatts of installed grid capacity across the world, there are research reactors and unfortunately defense demand. when demand outstrips supply, prices increase. this conserves supply while incentivizing production.

[@jackindustriesanimates]

Don't forget the other safer alternative to uranium, that being thorium because like TRIGA thorium doesn't explode as well as uranium does, along with that thorium reactors can be designed to be melt-down proof, and I'm excited to see public reactors use both thorium and TRIGA because they both are very promising, I wish Aalo atomics luck!

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

@@jackindustriesanimates I need to do a Thorium episode...

[@alexanderunopetrov6679]

"Welcome to aperture nuclear energy we're trying to make a portal gun "

[@MrRolnicek]

There are many ways to split an atom. This is one of them and indeed I would say a good bet for the cheap factory made reactor. Sodium cooled fast reactors already exist but the difference is they don't slow down those neutrons (fast) and as such require more fuel in the reactor to stay operational. Triga fuel lets you make the reactor smaller and safer. The biggest problem with those however is usually the use of liquid sodium which is a problem this reactor shares. The problem is mostly because sodium is flowing through pipes and any kind of leak of liquid sodium from a pipe is a huge danger and a hassle to fix. Terra Power has a solution to this problem which I hope these guys replicate. The solution is to simply not have the sodium in any pipes. All of the sodium sits in the big bucket built into the ground along with the reactor and the heat exchanger (heat exchange to solar salt because you don't want any leaks bewteen sodium and water) You can still circulate the sodium around but there is nowhere for it to leak other than the big hole in the ground where it's already supposed to be. Secondary benefit is that solar salt is very cheap and a good way to store thermal energy so you can have your power plant load following while still running the reactor itself at max power.

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

@@MrRolnicek what is solar salt? I have heard of TerraPower, that's the Bill Gates one, right?

[@MrRolnicek]

@@1stPrinciplesFM Indeed, Terra Power is the one from Bill Gates. And Solar Salt is just a type of salt typically used for storing heat at high temperatures because it's compatible with water (unlike most other salts), it's 60% NaNO3 and 40% KNO3. It's named solar salt because it is used as the target for heating in the mirror based solar power plants where large arrays of mirrors concentrate on one spot to heat up the solar salt which can then be used all day and all night to generate power.

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

@ very cool, thank you! I know that "molten salt" reactors exist but don't know much about them. Maybe a cool future episode!

[@MrRolnicek]

@@1stPrinciplesFM Molten salt reactors are indeed great and I would want to see an episode. I suggest an interview with the CEO of Copenhagen Atomics for that. The use of Solar Salt is not really related to molten salt reactors that much, Terra Power uses it because it's compatible with both the liquid sodium and water so it can heat exchange to both with minimal danger.

[@EricLidiak]

@@MrRolnicek Would love to see a video with the CEO of Copenhagen Atomics.

[@AverageHouse]

Also correction, Chernobyl did not initially meltdown it had a blowout, after that the remains did melt the area around it of course.

[@ethangreenyt]

So, it might be impossible for you but I play reactor simulators (Yes I know totally very realistic) but some are actually 1-1 to a real nuclear reactor. And most of them had automatic safety systems that cannot be turned off like cooling or scram. I somehow blew up both of them. One of them by raising rods to ~15% then very quickly pulling them all out fastly, cause increase of temp and pressure (its a preasure reactor) and kaboom. The other one, I some how always blow it up without trying. I try to start the reactor, I keep tripping the turbine when syncing despite being exactly in sync and at the exact speed. Whenever I lose power, for some reason, the emergency generators can never start and I can't get the emergency cooling online to keep the reactor level normal. Eventually rods get exposed and melt. If I was going to operate this reactor, don't let me near within 1000km of this facility. I'm serious.

[@labyplayz]

you know it's safe when you can casually hold a fuel rod in your hands

[@andrewfellingham8388]

So the thought is to make smaller.modular reactors by using a molten metal heat exchange with the reactor core. I can see this being helpful because to create steam plasma everything has to be under high pressure and there needs to be a containment vessel. Sodium, though, is an extremely reactive metal and will need to be contained using some very exotic alloys. That is the factor to overcome. Maybe use a salt in the heat exchange instead?

[@EzriRafe]

Take all of the control rods out and lets see if it still remains stable.

[@Johnrichox]

It would because the hotter it gets the fuel gets less reactive

[@miataguy24]

Negative void coeff reactors (Pressurized water reactors, etc etc) Cannot meltdown, as the water (Which slows down the neutrons for nuclear fission) can all boil away if it gets too hot. Meaning it wont have nuclear fission.

[@lolermosskoss1834]

He did that at 5:27

[@EzriRafe]

@@lolermosskoss1834 sorry I am blind and use captioning and audio descriptions.

[@lolermosskoss1834]

@ ah alright

[@jonathanbeck6663]

Such a great video, amazing quality, and great information. 👍

[@horsesavy4570]

TRIGA Reactors have always been Research reactors, hence the Acronym :Training, Research, Isotopes: General Atomics they were never initially designed for more than that. There are many other 5th Gen Reactor designs. Sadly Germany scraped all their research after 3 11 Fukushima.

[@LukeThougamingsir2022]

bro if I die I’m sueing you

[@SC_Dave]

*1:23:45**, explosion*

[@seantaggart7382]

The NRC hearing this "he did WHAT!?"

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

@@seantaggart7382 no snitching 😂

[@seantaggart7382]

@1stPrinciplesFM Oh i AM! hehehe But still I just did a research essay on why nuclear power should be used Heck! Chernboyl Fukushima and three mile were ALL 100% PREVENTABLE! there's nothing that is stopping us from using nuclear Except one thing COST its EXTREMELY expensive just to start up But after that it pays for itself Its just Really hard to get the funds for it

[@HudsonLindich]

7:13 chernobyl be gettin' pretty jealous of this one!

[@TimRobertsen]

0:40 - Cars are much more dangerous to you than a nuclear powerplant.

[@ILikeCats_285]

Because not everybody owns a nuclear powerplant

[@janicemauro7590]

1:19 I said at school I had a nuclear reactor in my backyard then came home to this. What a coincidence!

[@janicemauro7590]

Anyway what i said was fake don't take this seriously.

[@astac7095]

When I saw this vid I said : WHY YOU WANT TO MELT A REACTOR

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

For science!

[@christopherleubner6633]

Uranium zirconium hydride sounds ok till it reacts with water. It is UH3TiH4.. 7 hydrogen plus 2 reactive metals. It might have a negative coefficient but would get very unstable with burnup decay. 😮

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

I'm confused, what is that? UZrH + H2O, where does the titanium come from?

[@teresashinkansen9402]

I been wondering about this. How does burnup will affect the stability of this fuel? you will have plenty of fission products as well as transmutation products that might make the hydride far less stable, possibly releasing the hydrogen and causing a serious build up of pressure within the fuel element also it will produce deuterium and tritium which they can change the reactivity of the reactor due them being better moderators than protium. Tho I guess it also could mean tritium production might be a business for this kind of reactors.

[@cheesium137]

Timestamps 00:09 - Exploring a meltdown-proof nuclear reactor with Aalo Atomics. 01:52 - A startup explores a TRIGA reactor to experiment with a potential meltdown. 03:22 - Overview of nuclear reactor fuel and control rods. 04:41 - Demonstrating chain reactions and risks of control rod removal in a nuclear reactor. 06:11 - The TRIGA reactor's design prevents meltdown under extreme conditions. 08:19 - TRIGA fuel's unique properties enhance reactor safety through a negative temperature coefficient. 09:57 - Exploring the potential of TRIGA fuel in a novel sodium-cooled reactor. 11:30 - Nuclear technology offers promising solutions for future energy needs.

[@genesisreaper2113]

What life path do I have to take to be able to try and meltdown reactors without getting in trouble? That sounds like a BLAST

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

My strategy was to join a 50-person company, get lucky as it scaled to 400+ people, and make friends with other people who want to start startups of their own... Your mileage may vary but it's been awesome.

[@genesisreaper2113]

@@1stPrinciplesFM Glad to hear it, much luck to your continued success :)

[@saturnqx]

So at this point.. nuclear reactors are safer and more efficient at generating power and better for the planet than coal or oil? I'm all for it. If we continue to make nuclear power more affordable and miniaturized like this, who knows what we can do.

[@helgakrobo]

as soon as the CEO says "safe enough to fit in your back yard", alarm bells should start ringing in people's heads. Meltdowns are not the only danger for nuclear power, contamination and nuclear proliferation are no less important, and drastically widening the amount of people who can get their hands on nuclear fuel would have pretty severe consequences. Also, I want to stress this: the state that the reactor enters instead of a meltdown is still "hot and radioactive". this ensures that it's possible to operate without a containment building, but you'd still need to have a team of engineers watching over it to fix whatever's wrong.

[@Justwanttohavefunatschool]

Tech company: "Indeed"

[@Muonium1]

When it is said that the fuel temperature reached 400C, does this mean a uniform temperature throughout the fuel, or just the surface? And how long does it take to cool down to ambient? I don't see any boiling at the surface of the core head, so I'm guessing it cools extremely rapidly? It's very interesting that 23 megajoules is the total energy released in the pulse, because this is about as much energy as 18 sticks of dynamite detonating. In fact, the TRIGA pulse lasts roughly the same period of time too, about 5 microseconds or so. But why no massive BANG then, just a quiet "clunk"? I suspect because most of the energy released is in the form of neutrons and gamma rays, which are absorbed uniformly throughout a large volume of water, and there is no phase change, so no gas and no blast wave produced, just evenly distributed moderate heating throughout a large volume of water and fuel.

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

It is boiling - if you look at the second shot, the slo-mo one, you can see the bubbles!

[@yolopolotyur]

*melts down* ahh shi I guess I was wrong - ceo

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

*melts down* *Jim Halpert smirk directly at camera*

[@nathan584]

I thought sodium metal reactors were thrown out 50 years ago. Simi valley California rocketdyne my backyard is the location of the first sodium reactor melt down and it was due to the nature of the sodium metal it oxidizes extremely easy and those oxides built up on in the cooling chanel's creating hot spots in the reactor making weird readings so they kept pushing and testing until it was too late and it melt down causing a clean up effort that is still ongoing. So I wonder how they solved or are going to solve that issue of oxide build up pretty cool though none the less I want one lol

[@Muonium1]

it was not due to the nature of the sodium, but of the tetralin used to cool the pump seals. Tetralin, a hydrocarbon liquid, seeped into the primary coolant system through a pump seal and was decomposed by the high-temperature sodium. The decomposed tetralin clogged several narrow cooling channels used by the sodium system to remove heat from the reactor fuel elements. As the tetralin residues clogged the reactor's internal cooling channels, 13 of the reactor's 43 fuel elements overheated and were damaged.

[@nathan584]

@ oh wow thank you for that I don't know how I never knew that detail about the seals being the initial cause.

[@Purplegon]

mom said its my turn to try and cause a reactor meltdown

[@FloridaCatholicGuy]

This would be great if they made it work for people that want to live off grid!

[@CHRIS-ELID]

So what's nominal working temperature and what's maximum temperature till it trigger automatically colder?

[@GoinGlobal-tv]

THIS VIDEO IS SICK!!!!

[@evankeil5055]

Can you investigate wind turbines next? Are they killing the whales or not???

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

@@evankeil5055 hmmmmm not sure there are any offshore wind startups but it's a cool thing to check out

[@ActualDogWaterAtThis]

no more electricity bills!

[@wolfy_potatowcue]

8:09 If you had an RBMK-1000 reactor, it would have gone Kaboom instead of cooling down.

[@evankeil5055]

How much total energy did people require 100 years ago to power their entire life? Way less right? Is that number still increasing?

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

Way way less, 100 years ago, electricity was still super new. Only 40% of Americans had electrified homes. Definitely demand and supply rise together! Average today is like 10 megawatt hours per year per house

[@evankeil5055]

How many reactors would we need to power the US?

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

@@evankeil5055 at least 7

[@M.T.B55]

I think indeed think about why is the price about the Elektrizität so cheap

[@davidchappelle3212]

What would happen if you power down the reactor for maintenance? Would the liquid sodium turn into solid sodium?

[@the_retag]

Unless it is constantly heated by auxillary heaters it probably would. Maybe the decay heat would keep it liquid for a while. Its the most difficult part of liquid metal cooled reactors, the Soviets had some trouble with that on their Submarines

[@HotSocket]

"there might be one"? more like "there has been many"

[@autumntheguywholifts3732]

so if some country were to bomb the plant would it cause as much damage like Chernobyl

[@Satwix]

so fire first ad i’ve ever willingly clicked in my life

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

@@Satwix 🫡

[@Commander_Sparrow1]

Where’s Kyle Hill at

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

@@Commander_Sparrow1 come through Kyle! I play Commander too!!

[@Josephwashere1]

When i hear nuclear i think oh cool good safe energy

[@stankenootgaming]

You need a dyatlov instant meltdown applicator

[@Goatis267]

I could do better at making it go boom

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

@@Goatis267 plz don't prove it

[@man_with_a_face]

bro, just turn off the turbines and the pressure will blow the core to smithereens putting radioactive steam into the atmosphere

[@КомиссарЁж]

So you're using hydrogen in fuel as a moderator like in thermal neutron reactors, but then you're trying to build a reactor using sodium as a coolant like in fast neutron reactor. If you're building a fast neutron reactor you can't use moderators, but if you're trying to build a thermal neutron reactor with liquid metal (which is questionable) then you won't have enough hydrogen in fuel as a moderator. So the question is: why won't you just build a fast neutron reactor which is safe enough by itself?

[@BattleBuddys]

i mean it would not be possible to melt it down, but to make it explode due to pressure would be possible.

[@royaltacos7217]

it would also explode if you planted a bomb in it

[@chriscarrol9373]

Didn't the Soviets have something like this tiny remote nuclear power ? Can't remember where I heard about them but they where used in the sixties and some hikers found one and died. Them a team had to come in spending only a minute oe two at a time to deal with it.

[@the_retag]

That was radioisotope generators. Extremely reliable and stable, but weak as they are powered by nuclear decay. The ones people died from were broken and missing the shielding

[@DrRChandra]

explore the thorium fuel cycle

[@BloopStyler]

extremely cool

[@tilltheprogamer2129]

@Kyle Hill would like that

[@Tom-em3dv]

This is so cool

[@CindyOgden-y8b]

Is it a try to kill everyone in that building

[@thatoneguy-t8s2f]

You WHAT?!?!

[@roblanxkreal]

underrated

[@nicksantos43]

The UT reactor is just a stones throw away from me. Please be careful 😉

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

Haha Dr Bill wouldn't have let me mess anything up

[@TJK50014]

Texas announces plan for advanced nuclear reactors across the state worth over $50 billion. Texas Governor Greg Abbott and the Public Utility Commission of Texas have identified 61 possible sites across the state for new nuclear reactors. A recently-released state report on Advanced Nuclear Energy is hoping to bring in over $50 billion in new economic output to Texas, along with $27 billion in income for Texas workers.

[@mylittlegamer-j2z]

what if it melted down

[@ОльгаСакада-з4ю]

I was Know All must all about Nuclear power Before see this video

[@mrbane2000]

7:25 Enough for Back to the future car to work

[@MrKelaher]

That reactor can not be melted down because it is designed to work that way. Its a neutron source ? Perhaps Aalo can pivot some elements to power production, but "betting" on that is basically just that - a bet, the Bayesian priors are not in their favour, because smaller reactors need even HIGHER temps than larger ones to maintain efficiency due to thermodynamics, and this fuel is inherently low temp, regardless of the heat transfer fluid.

[@chriscarrol9373]

Ya surrounding it with sodium good idea. Throw some pure sodium in a chlorinated pool for fun.

[@wolfsmaul-ger8318]

"b-b-b-but chernobyl!!!"

[@Gamer_io1298]

Here before it blows up, not literally 😅

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

This is a REAL KZbin video, and we are here to make it BLOW UP

[@MrBrownpants-w3t]

This sounds like something that should have been worked out BEFORE EVs. Just saying....

[@racheldoden413]

turn off steam valves (not a meltdown but a blowout) but still

[@BlueLobster00]

Bro why can i watch this on youtube music

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

@@BlueLobster00 do you not love the sultry sounds of nuclear reactors in the morning

[@BlueLobster00]

@@1stPrinciplesFM yeah i do

[@mylittlegamer-j2z]

why

[@bocahkreatif362]

My location? Oh yeah don't go Chernobyl or radioaktive IM NOT IN TERE in at Indonesian

[@MrQuick999]

*Guy messes with reactor controls triggering AI controlled Plasma ultrasonic holography pressure field using reactors own power as the only limit take control and sends message to Empire > Wolf predator gets deployed to potential sabotage attempt of reactor using his plasma ultrasonic cloaking suit to navigate safely through Ultrasonic field while everyone else is stunned in place by vibration of motor cells beyond communication but below harm aka Induced sleep paralysis* Not nuclear but would be the same security.. Always get approval from the dark side of the govt before playing games. 😛👽 *Points at Boeing Plasma force field and points at your nuclear reactor* Pressure potential greater than bottom of sea.. Ever seen ghost rider? When is a machine both alive and dead? When its melting but still holding form for purpose..

[@tankers4all]

Remove water

[@1stPrinciplesFM]

Where do I put it

[@tankers4all]

@ idk somewhere

[@Amithguru-ym7cj]

Beep bep

[@BryceAndEveeNZ]

Would love to see you react to this @tfolsenuclear

[@riccardoriganti838]

We have that reactor model in Italiy too! ☢🟢⚪🔴