Excellent details about dual structural system and also requested that provide time history analysis and vibration control system
@azmat_waseem2 жыл бұрын
Very Informative... Thank you...
@roshankumar-ee2jh2 ай бұрын
After these steps, wall need to be designed with2000 series load combination right?
@mehedihasanasif69588 ай бұрын
thanks for the tutorial! can i apply the scale factors if i do static analysis for the structure???
@rcbsht96442 жыл бұрын
Waiting for more videos
@manjumanjunath27612 жыл бұрын
Please make a video on flat slab system also
@maheshpatil2484 Жыл бұрын
Sir, with this scale factor n new load combination we need to design the columns at the 1st level only or column in the entire building (all column in every storey)?
@zethrumahtita61072 жыл бұрын
Sir, maybe can display on Tutorial how to apply Fpx and Fpy in detail to get Axial force in Collector Beam and Slab to design diapframhn and Chord.
@feathersomg8027 Жыл бұрын
Bro, which program you use for drawing on screen? Thank you
@kayguanlao6106 Жыл бұрын
Hi! If during my initial checking of base shear for col and wall, I found out that the column is already carrying 26% of the total base shear, should i continue with the process or just proceed with the design of the frames and walls without scaling?
@ilustraca Жыл бұрын
In that case no required as u already achieved the required criteria
@parashkhand3388 Жыл бұрын
Sir, While performing NLDTHA taking multiple earthquakes(around 7), is it necessary to scale up the base shear due to earthquakes and equal all of them?
@AkshayKothiyal Жыл бұрын
Hi I have one query You are considering the response reduction factor as 4 for ductile structural wall but taking the design consideration of dual system in analysis , In IS code (note 3) it is clearly mentioned for zone 3,4,5 R = 5 shall be considered Please explain Thanks Er Akshay Kothiyal
@noobgameplay80062 жыл бұрын
do we need to do same process for lift wall system building?
@ilustraca2 жыл бұрын
If u consider ur walls of lift shaft to resist lateral force then yes
@ilustraca2 жыл бұрын
It depends on how what u consider and accordingly u design
@shahsagar67612 жыл бұрын
👌👌
@parasgupta75272 жыл бұрын
What about wall design combination? should we reduce to 75% or design for the older combination ??
@ilustraca2 жыл бұрын
Which reduction u r talking about?
@er.rajishbaidya9519 Жыл бұрын
@@ilustraca you have scaled the column design for 25%, but what about the wall , will it remain same or scale to take only 75% shear? Plz tell us how the load combination for wall too?
@ilustraca Жыл бұрын
Walls will be designed for whatever force we r getting at beginning for normal load combinations without any scaling of forces.
@er.rajishbaidya9519 Жыл бұрын
@@ilustraca thank you.
@er.rajishbaidya9519 Жыл бұрын
Very clearly explained.
@indranilbal95072 жыл бұрын
Sir, how to model walls like that? Is it a manual process or automatically divided walls? Should I draw wall by parts and then provide supports?
@ilustraca2 жыл бұрын
Walls divided manually using Edit Shell
@indranilbal95072 жыл бұрын
@@ilustraca ok sir.. thankyou
@manjumanjunath27612 жыл бұрын
What is the difference between manual mesh and auto mesh and what are the changes we can expect from the model
@ilustraca2 жыл бұрын
If u devide the wall wd Automesh option, it will be divided both horizontal and longitudinal direction... now if u see, the load transfer point is only available at floor levels and there is no intermediate point where load transfer to wall is happening hence no mesh required. To match the mesh size of slab/floor we divided wall longitudinally wd a max size of the same that we have provided for slab/floor.
@ilustraca2 жыл бұрын
There is nothing wrong if u mesh automatically...in that case the analysis time will be increased unnecessarily... again at bottom of wall the reactions will be shown only at 2 end points if not meshed manually that will lead to a conservative transfer of load in foundation