Imaging Galaxies in light-polluted suburbs with cheap CLS filter and Achromatic Refractor pt1

[@GTheoMedia]

Is your camera stock or modified? Nice review.

[@NMHC1978]

for the vignetting, you need to make flats

[@ruiyang5995]

What's the model number for the filter?

[@lecaleite]

I have the same equipment as you (orion 120st), in the other video I saw that the chromatic aberration in your photos are exactly the same as I have. I live in a place with 3/4 scale bortle, little light pollution. But I liked the result of the filter, it removed almost everything from aberration. Did you reduce the aberration via software? or is that already the final result after the star has been processed? Are you enjoying the filter? have more photos? Instagram? My camera is modified is your camera modified? I saw that it isnt good on modified cameras, do you know why?

[@RollingAu]

Yeah before I had any filters I tried my best to remove/balance the colors( chromatic aberration and light pollution) on my images. But Ive kind of given up on imaging in the suburbs, I had other images like the Jellyfish nebula and other objects I had imaged but I decided to scrap those pictures, kinda got tired of trying to image in shitty skies. Ill probably upload a new video using both the CLS and my Stc filter under really dark skies, I think having a nice dark sky is probably way better than having expensive equipment or filters in my opinion. And none of my cameras are modified, and that is true I have seen people say that certain filters are useless with cameras that haven't been modified, though I haven't seen anyone test that theory out, I have also tested my filters and cameras in photographing the sun, so i might upload a vid about that.

[@lametraserillos1]

nice !! the telescope is a 120/1000 ?? thanks

[@RollingAu]

120/600mm...but with all that, 'backing it out', might as well it be a 1000mm

[@nigelpendred3129]

Does the CLS filter remove CA from ' visual ' stargazing , as well as astro imaging .Thanks ...great video

[@RollingAu]

@@nigelpendred3129 didn't think about that, but I'm sure it should work, don't see why it shouldn't.