Imagining 10 Dimensions - the Movie

[@enzohernandez8282]

4th Dimension stamps: 00:00 - Beggining 12:45 - Imagining the zeroth dimension 22:53 - Imagining the First dimension 26:51 - Imagining the Second dimension 33:21 - Imagining the Third dimension 38:37 - Imagining the Fourth dimension 48:01 - Imagining the Fifht dimension 56:41 - Imagining the Sixth dimension 1:07:39 - Imagining the Seventh dimension 1:20:11 - Imagining the Eight dimension 1:31:07 - Imagining the Ninth dimension

[@Nora-lv1fq]

@Jared Christopher Palmer you’re amazing

[@linkkid185]

Thank you so much! 💚

[@lucky_342]

fifth* eighth*

[@peekasnooze3626]

“4th dimension stamps” instead of “time stamps” Genius.

[@nocucksinkekistan7321]

everyone but me gotta learn ur cringe

[@frenzy4046]

I remember watching this when I was 5 years old on my grandparents computer. 10 years later and I can actually understand what is being taught. This video truly is timeless. Pun intended

[@X-boomer]

It is, nevertheless, complete bullshit. You’re wasting time learning bullshit.

[@icemd24]

I think this Bob Bryanton is a genius. He found a way to visualize something that human mind cannot visualize. It might not be 100% accurate, but it's a GREAT starting point for the average people.

[@XpistosRules]

the video animation is extremely helpful.

[@kucasmukas7942]

+icemd24 It's terrible place to start if you want to understand the Universe, but if you settle for fantasy then it's great.

[@icemd24]

Kucas Mukas What makes you think so?

[@kucasmukas7942]

icemd24 Non-fiction is evidence based where as fiction is based on imagination.

[@JuandelaCruz001]

I think so too. Certainly not the most perfect/accrurate method, but the right kind of method.

[@joemyk]

Timestamps : 12:44 Imagining 0th dimension 22:54 Imagining 1st dimension 26:54 Imagining 2nd dimension 33:24 Imagining 3rd dimension 38:34 Imagining 4th dimension 48:04 Imagining 5th dimension 57:04 Imagining 6th dimension 1:07:54 Imagining 7th dimension 1:20:14 Imagining 8th dimension 1:31:14 Imagining 9th dimension

[@DragonautX]

0:27 "We start with a point...". From that point on, my perspective of this world changed forever.

[@sentival]

when we draw a person on paper, it becomes a picture. when 4D creatures draw a person on their 4D paper, it becomes a sculpture...

[@billyworkmna]

When a 5D person draws a 4D person, it becomes a animated movie When a 6D person draws a 5D person, it becomes a video game. When a 7D person draws a 6D person, it becomes a... uh... my brain has melted.

[@DerpessedDOGGO]

@@billyworkmna it becomes real life

[@NBC1232014]

When a 5D creature draws a person, it becomes the outside of our expanding universe.. ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🌌⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛

[@Cassandria]

@@billyworkmna video game development software?

[@VulpinetideCuteTimes0w0]

I thought of this. Just as us 3 Dimensional beings have to give life to 2 Dimensional beings by animating them or giving them Artificial intelligence on a 2D plane, a 4th Dimensional being might possibly do the same in some way but on a 3D plane, so it would resemble something like CGI, or something more complex that might not be Fathomable to us. The "3D cgi" we use is not really 3 Dimensional, it's only the illusion of 3D space, but really it's still on a 2D surface. This makes me think there might possibly be a "creator" of sorts, or some kind of process in the 4th dimension that influences our current dimension, but it would be nothing we could ever imagine and it's intentions would be far beyond our understanding. However, a 2D being can't question it's own existence unless we 3D beings animate them to, every action it takes is because we designed or coded them to do so, and the similar phenomenon happens with us 3D beings. We think we have free will, but if you know about the *"Libet Experiment,"* Our brains make decisions before we act on it, even if it's a fraction of a micro second. Isn't that curious? Could someone or something be "animating" or coding our decisions in some strange, unfathomable way in the 4th dimension? It makes me wonder. It might not even be a straight forward animation of us #D beings, it could be an artificial intelligence randomizing the universe as they watch it grow and become more complex, such as we 3D beings made on a 2D screen with digital particles made of 1s and 0s. Our fundamental particles in our 3D universe is like our 1s and 0s. but are far more complex, and is the equivalent of having 2s 3s and 4s etc to create our universe. But I'm just speculating.

[@leftysheppey]

not to sound rude, but it's a great video to fall to sleep to. he has such a relaxing voice

[@FrYiLo--]

you mustve not heard of alan watts

[@sj_leee4995]

also those sound effects sound really nice

[@mimimalignant]

@@FrYiLo-- lol lol I was just about to say "He is all right, but he is no Alan Watts."

[@THEBOSS-vn2ky]

Im napping here

[@bluey4605]

His voice is like heroin hey

[@UltimaDJS]

So basically what is being said is that: 0 = point 1=length 2=height 3=depth 4=space-time (the capacity to change) 5=alternate space-time in a hypersphere that we call our "reality" 6=the ability to travel to alternate space-time through phasespace 7=the collection of phasespace into observable realities that are different than our own however our's is a point or a brane in this complex 8=the total collection of all possibilities in our reality (seen as a point) and others (symbolized as an itersection of lines) 9=the ability to "tunnel" to those alternate reality through an inter-versal phasespace is this an accurate representation of what is being said?

[@strongwing422]

👏

[@vidyutdevam9204]

Do u hv any mathematic proofs for it

[@DarkoSubotin]

Nicely said, i didn't have the fancy words for it, but I thought of this interpretation the same way.

[@mentalitydesignvideo]

@@vidyutdevam9204 do you have a proof that any number of dimensions exist? how would you go about it?

[@mentalitydesignvideo]

@@ayurgeso the process of deriving a proof of any number of dimensions existing is to link to Wikipedia? Brilliant.

[@couragecoachsam]

This series has been a goldmine of spiritual understanding. Excited to see materialist perspectives catch up to refine and accept some of these ideas

[@LearningandGrowing47]

Maybe you should travel through the sixth dimension and get some bitches

[@lowdownuknow]

I have been introduced to these concepts with different analogies and metaphors to only leave me more confused than where I started. I could recite what was said but could never truly internalize it. This my friend has laid fodder for the seed to take root. From watching this I can finally say, ahhhh I get it! Thank you. Sometimes some concepts are difficult for me to digest and this here was smooth and completely digestible.

[@10thdim]

Thanks! This is a set of ideas I’ve been passionate about since I first started imagining these orthogonal dimensions at the age of seven back in 1962. I’ve become a fan of Plato’s concept of “anamnesis” - the idea that there are things we are born knowing, forget as children, then educate ourselves to remember. Schrödinger, of course, was a lifelong student and active promoter of Eastern mysticism and the Vedanta, seeing connections to the quantum world he was helping to reveal, that’s anamnesis too I would say.

[@hemmmy1]

This is literally the best piece of content I have ever had the pleasure of viewing, it and I sincerely thank you for making it.

[@X-boomer]

Unfortunately the framing is bollocks. Most of the ideas presented are fairly well grounded (if not necessarily real) but these are not really dimensions at all.

[@kriskaniac6556]

The original “Imagining the Tenth Dimension” video literally changed my life, I would not be the person I am today had I never seen it!

[@X-boomer]

@@kriskaniac6556 then you are basing your life on a lie

[@kriskaniac6556]

@@X-boomer not really, it’s just one possible interpretation of realty. Whether or not you consider these dimensions it’s a relevant to the fact that it is a way to order all possible patterns. There’s a lot that coincides with string theory and makes the most sense, for instance superposition being particles in a higher dimension that collapse into what we see as that particle’s lower dimensional shadow, hence why you can’t measure all properties of certain particles simultaneously. I don’t necessarily believe every aspect but it is a great way to open your mind up to more possibilities, and a lot of innovation has come from string theory and such so it’s at least partially correct.

[@X-boomer]

@@kriskaniac6556 look. There are theories that involve extra dimensions that have been developed by professional physicists and reviewed and refined by other physicists over many years. I don’t have a problem with any theory that is supported by the evidence and doesn’t break physics. But this video represents a speculation made by a non professional who may not even have any relevant academic credentials, it is not peer reviewed. And besides all that, it is directly ruled out both by its internal logical flaws AND by direct physical evidence. I’m afraid it’s bullshit.

[@daveslow84]

I've actually experienced being two dimensional... Was a fairly big salvia hit though.

[@deadliestmag]

That happened to me too, Salvia is a hell of a drug.

[@kristianspot2683]

Try DMT. Shamans say that you jump into 6th.

[@ngr3gorius]

It split me in half. Oh, Sal...

[@brianmcnellis5512]

daveslow84 You better get your head out your ass! Goddamn Jesus-freak!

[@EmeraldEyesEsoteric]

I felt two dimensional walking around on LSD. Then I saw a car blasting some rap music, and the car itself was bouncing around like it would if this was a cartoon car blasting music. True Story.

[@23mystiq]

This is actually so spiritual.... I could not stop thinking about duality, dimensions as spirituality describes them and the Source/ reaching enlightenment... And it actually makes so much sense!

[@sonicshaman2997]

it's fascinating how well science and logic fit together with spirituality, in the end, they give us the same answers just formulated differently.

[@RandomAmbles]

Unfortunately, almost all of this is amazingly speculative mathematical science fiction with no actual evidence to back it up. So in a sense yes, it is rather like spirituality. Sabine Hosenfelder will help to set you straight.

[@toneiv6560]

Same

[@anirudhmitra4232]

@@RandomAmbles Sabine is too rigid and constrained in her scientific outlook. For example just bcz you cannot visit an exoplanet doesn't mean it does not exist.

[@RandomAmbles]

@@anirudhmitra4232 I agree, but I think a consideration of the virtues of her thinking will move people closer to how I think they ought to think.

[@N1H1L9]

This is just lovely. I was only wondering the other day wtf the fifth dimension was. Alright, I'm lost now.

[@johannvonbabylon]

I had an interesting philosophical thought on the idea of zero as explained in this video. If zero minus negative one equals 1, it explains why anything at all exists. A void of nothingness can spawn anything and a void by its nature contains everything, and since those things are contained, all possibilities are immediately realized.

[@silasbeacom2930]

Yes thank you

[@monash4250]

What a fascinating concept. Can u please elaborate further.

[@polidon1577]

Hot take: flat earthers aren't wrong, they're just lost flatlanders

[@rustyshackleford2841]

Damn son. That’s deep.

[@polidon1577]

@@rustyshackleford2841 Too bad they can't see depth

[@rustyshackleford2841]

Dustin Ngo The survivor children of an inter dimensional copy of our world, where it’s flat. I like that. They should use this.

[@baberoot1998]

Now that...is funny. Lol.

[@martinacevedohace8anos166]

Minecraft proof that the earth is flat

[@SepSol75]

It is so well-made that you don't even feel the passage of time!

[@MemphisP123]

This is the explanation I have been waiting many years for. This gave me an epiphany.

[@cantanaband3611]

this is bullshit, all dimensions are spatial

[@brianmcnellis5512]

Phil Harris You don't know what this is about

[@brianmcnellis5512]

Cantana Band because you can't possibly wrap your narrow mind around it? I don't wanna hear no more outa you! Is that clear? You're a very nice individual!

[@bravonana10]

Brian McNellis Lmao

[@brianmcnellis5512]

Avon Barksdale ??

[@IrrationalBees]

This epic of science have given me religion. Because, the nature of the essence of information at the ultimate ensemble, is God itself. I have always been a follower of Spinoza's God, but, for many years, under my expanding belt, this video has supported my arguments against my mostly Catholic and Protestant peers. Thanks again, even in these trifling times. This movie has brought reason and understanding to even the most devout of followers of an old book.

[@aojae2450]

9th dimension my reaction at first: "good god this is the matrix."

[@T0B3573R]

I know it's like you finally reach infinity but then the nature of everything is like "Nope! Try again!"

[@spiralsun1]

I have been trying to say that there is no such thing as “nothing”. And that before the universe there was everything!! I came to this to solve the problems of consciousness and that it evolved. Super gratifying to see this clear explanation.

[@subject_5056h]

Of course there isn't such a thing as "nothing". Nothingness is nothing but a concept that can only exist because there is something. So without something, there is no nothing, and therefore there is something. The same applies to life and death.

[@obsideonyx7604]

Zero as visualised here reminds me of the phrase, "As above, so below". A popular modern paraphrase of the second verse of the Emerald Tablet. The 0'th and the 10th dimension. As above, so below.

[@MrChugwater]

The popping noise you heard was the circuit breakers in my brain blowing. I had a headache this morning and decided I could relax and watch this clip...that was a stupid idea.

[@Constantinesis]

What if a computer is a being which lives in the 1st dimension? A computer can only understand strings of 0 and 1, that is absence or presence which is what one would see if it lived on a single dimensional line. It would see just a blinking point. These computers, which we build today, can only peform one calculation at a time. Now a two dimensional computer would be able to read many code lines instantaneous. A quantum computer can do this so maybe it is an example of a being living in Flatland ! My question is how long is the horizon line that a flatlander can see?

[@BharathKumarIyer]

Constantin Eugen Cozma ..that was mind bogglingly awesome! thanks for that. To answer your point about the flatlands, I don't think that they would need to have any limit on the size of the horizon. They could equally well have an implicit knowledge of an infinitely distant horizon, but be living on a curved plane of some sort which would give them a varying horizon line.

[@louis9833]

Constantin Eugen Cozma But humans also only see 0 and 1. 0 = no value 1= va;ue we see values

[@MOSMASTERING]

+Caprica Six We interpret values. We use counting every day, but we count macroscoic objects that can be broken down into infinitely smaller pieces.

[@alexi077]

the horizon of a flatlander is exactly 2πr with r the distance a flatlander can see.

[@drewisaacson4312]

This guy should get his own award. You made me realize that 0 is all!

[@smh9902]

The Answer to the Meaning of Life, the Universe, and Everything, is not 42. Its actually 0.

[@Ghostly-00]

+Joe Schmoe yeeesss

[@sergiuszs]

You know nothing!

[@credenzamostro]

Drew Isaacson Do not trust Rob Bryanton, there's a very good reason he's never received an award.

[@daxross2930]

GuySaysThings true evolution comes from those that think outside the box and push the paradigm. Not just some labeling like an award

[@b3at2]

I'm just happy Micheal Jackson is still alive in another dimension. ..

[@jamesmorrison2577]

***** Then wouldn't there be a universe where I'm a super genius and decide to tell all the other universes' "me" that this multi-verse thing is actually true

[@akizmetkat999]

***** Crazy, man. This shit gives me a headache. I believe in the 'everything is realized' reality myself. But believing it exists does me no good whatsoever. My perception of reality (MY path - defined by MY choices) is all I see. As soon as I realize a new choice, I'm redirected. Instantly rerouted off the old track and seamlessly headed off into a different direction, a different future. But from my perspective, I have NO idea what has just occurred, if anything occurred at all. Its like, how badly do you want to see behind the curtain? Bad enough that you'll commit to living an entire lifetime just to experience the effect that that one decision made in your life? Whew.......Must Find Advil.

[@MultiGoban]

You do realise that also every bad thing is also happening "right now" in an infinity of other dimensions? XD So in the end it's an infinity of good things and an infinity of bad things, therefore the ratio is 1? Can a mathematician tell me what is (infinity divided by infinity)?

[@b3at2]

MultiGoban i guess it comes down to what dimension you care about..

[@LIVERPOOLFRANK]

What saddens me is the utter rotten implications those universes mean. Example, I can be Hittler, I can be Jesus and I can be George Bush. There is something wrong with the parallel universe theory, ethically speaking of course. Further implications indicate many more fucked up scenarios as I can be as big as the tangible universe. One has to wonder, what the serious fuck are we?

[@AlexanderAshley]

Who's here in 2020 with new ways to apply this concept?

[@10thdim]

There have been a number of developments in the last several years which have moved my ideas closer to the mainstream. The detection of gravity waves and the demonstration of 4D time crystals have confirmed my approach to envisioning the fourth dimension as being just as spatial as the others. Nobel in physics laureate Kip Thorne, in his 2014 book The Science of Interstellar portrays the fifth dimension as giving you simultaneous access to the multiple probabilistic outcomes of Everett's Many Worlds, one of the basic ideas I've been promoting since this project began in 2006. My newest book, which you can see more about at tenthdimension.com is called "We Start With a Point (but what's the point?)” and it explores the very question you are asking. It also tracks the ups and downs I've seen in my own life since this project began, a topic that has come up in my most recent videos as well. Now that I'm 65 I'm retiring from my career as a composer and 5.1 theatrical film mixer. Imagining the Tenth Dimension has been my passionate hobby for these past 14 years. There has been a worldwide response to this project - my first book has even been translated into Punjabi and Farsi, and a Korean youtube channel has a bootleg copy of my first video with my name covered up, it's at over 5 million views! A number of other channels on KZbin and elsewhere also have racked up substantial views of my work without giving me credit, some even claiming they created the video. Still, even just on my own channel KZbin tells me people have spent over 1.1 million hours watching my content, a fact I find astonishing and humbling. As a non-scientist I've been quite willing to explore the connections between my approach and topics that some dismiss as "woo". Sacred geometry, the Kaballah, the Vedas, angelology, genes in a River Out of Eden, the Pythagorean Tetractys, ghosts, the primacy of consciousness, the Platonic doctrine of anamnesis, and much more have come up in the over 450 videos I've published on this channel over the years. The shared visions experienced by humans in various altered states has been one particularly fertile area of exploration. Do a google search for the work of algekalipso to find someone who understands the math, the extra-dimensional topologies and the psychological ramifications of all this much more deeply than I do. Having never tried a psychedelic myself, I was particularly honoured when author and serious psychedelics researcher David Jay Brown said this in his book The New Science of Psychedelics: "Physicist Michio Kaku's book Hyperspace: A Scientific Odyssey through Parallel Universes, Time Warps, and the Tenth Dimension and Rob Bryanton's Imagining the Tenth Dimension both seem to provide uncanny maps of the territory that one encounters after smoking salvia or DMT. Like the two-dimensional character in Edwin Abbott's book Flatland, we seem just as limited in our three-dimensional perspective." To be clear, I have smoked marijuana on occasion (it's legal here in Canada), and my doctor son recently informed me that some cannabis does have psychedelic properties, though you can't prove that through my own experience. But the idea that altered states, achieved through meditation, sensory deprivation, or ritualistic movement, or various drugs and medicines, do allow people to catch glimpses of patterns and perhaps even entities from the extra dimensions makes sense to me. Graham Hancock's book Supernatural explores these altered states connections across geography and human history, it's well worth a read. Here are some links for my project: kzbin.info patreon.com/10thdim instagram.com/10thdim twitter.com/10thdim tenthdimension.com tenthdimension.com/blog

[@AlexanderAshley]

@@10thdim I love the way your mind works! We've actually chatted a few times over the years but I would love to just really sit and talk with you about some of this stuff! Recently I have been applying the 1st and 2nd Dimensions to Light and Sound. I feel like the best way to wrap our minds around the "Flatlander" experience is to watch sound waves on a Digital Audio Workstation. The gaps between sound bites and the shapes of the individual sound waves, all layered together to create one complete song. It takes a 3rd dimensional approach to view the anatomy of a song. With light and electrical currents, I apply that to the 1st dimension. It's all about directions. Is it a one-way street or a two way street? What does that difference mean? Are there other nodes that the current can flow to and through? And how does that flow of current effect the higher dimensions, i.e., powering a light bulb once the switch is flipped. I could go on but I'm at work right now. I just wanted to set the tone of the conversation. ☺

[@10thdim]

Alexander Ashley Right on! Schrodinger said “I insist upon the view that all is waves”. Looking at a waveform in a DAW, we can imagine it as a shadow of Everett’s Universal Wavefunction, and rather than a sample rate of 48K (or whatever) we can imagine that the sample rate is defined at the Planck length. Drop your cursor at a specific position and you get a very specific amplitude, this gives us a way to imagine how the point like particles can spring from Schrodinger’s waves through observation. One of my favorite reviews from Amazon of my first book said they liked my “strangely musical” way of imagining reality. Within that paradigm, our entire universe from beginning to end is like a song, and the different probabilistic outcomes for the universe would be different performances of that song, what do you think about that idea?

[@AlexanderAshley]

@@10thdim You hit the nail right on the head! I too see the universe and reality in a musical way, and a mathematical way as well. I was just telling my friend yesterday that the easiest way to imagine multiple different infinites is to imagine restarting a video game and playing a new set within the same universal laws. Playing another game on another counsel or platform would be more of a folding through the dimension above.

[@AlexanderAshley]

And another way to imagine infinites of different scales is to look at our number line from additional axis. For example, on the X line, we can call that our positive and negative scale. But I believe that we can create a branch from that axis to represent our decimal places. Then as you place your point on the coordinates of, let's say 6.3109, you will end up with a triangular shape representing that number, rather than a line of a particular length on a number line.

[@consciouslobster9310]

First time someone could explain this to me without leaving me more confused . That was great , thank you .

[@Zwelch007]

For anyone who comes here and watches this video, I will copy this Amazon review of Rob Bryanton's book: I bought the book, because I am a graduate student in string theory and was curious about "new" ways of thinking in ten dimensions. I knew the author of the book was actually a musician (some research with google was required for that), but so is Brian May of Queen, and his book "BANG - THE COMPLETE HISTORY OF THE UNIVERSE" is very well-written. Well, I couldn't be more wrong. Whereas Brian May studied physics (and is currently doing his long-lost PhD), Bryanton has never touched a scientific article, let alone stood near the mathematics required to grasp them. All his "knowledge" comes from science fiction (which he uses as genuine "references" for his wild ideas), popular science books (Greene, Kaku and Randall) and Scientific American. Although the book is not intended to be a discription of "real physics", as he points out in the introduction, his ideas on ten dimensions and the alledged connection to string theory and the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics couldn't be stated more explicitely and couldn't be more wrong. The many world interpretation 'assumes' multiple universes in which all possible quantum processes do happen. Bryanton thinks these multiverses are in the dimensions 5 to 10. Moreover, our third spatial dimension is merely the thing "we fold through" to go from one place on a surface to another, which are not directly linked. If he is referring to the holographic principle, he's wrong there as well. Physically and mathematically, what he claims about space and time is absolute bullocks, if I may use the expression. The first chapter is exactly what is shown on his website and the rest is just a filler in which he tries to explain the ideas of quantum observation and its relation to philosophy, poorly. There is absolutely no (scientific) connection to string theory or whatsoever, except that the number 10 and the word dimensions are in the same sentence. The eleven dimensions of M-theory are in his view superfluous. The book is perhaps intended to be scientifically and philosophically provocative, but in fact it is scientifically incorrect and at most philosophically boring. If you really want to know something about string theory and modern developments on a non-technical level, buy The Elegant Universe or The Fabric of the Cosmos by Brian Greene, Hyperspace or Parallel Universes by Michio Kaku, or Warped Passages by Lisa Randall, and your money will be well-spent. Other ideas on quantum gravity can be found in Lee Smolin's "Three Roads to Quantum Gravity". For the mathematical inclined reader (as Greene would call it in the notes), Penrose's "The Road to Reality" could be interesting, which is a brilliant mathematical exposé of theoretical physics. Moreover, because the author does not fully understand quantum physics, his explanations are even for scientists hard to follow, because they don't seem logical. For non-scientists, I cannot recommend this book either, since I don't think it will help you in any way: you probably won't understand the science and if you do understand what the author says, you understand the wrong thing.

[@neoutopiamessiah3]

I've watched this video a few times, and every time I watch it it gets better! I want to encourage you to continue your work; there are many people that I've shown this to who find it fascinating :) keep it up

[@sudonim7552]

My mind was blown so hard it started Fallout 5

[@SkillaFairy]

I watched the 10min summary like 5 years ago and that summary was enough. Didn't know it has an hour version, am grateful 🙏 🎉

[@zswu31416]

I've seen a shortened version of this before. I finally found the whole thing!

[@waynesaban2607]

Please see my thoughts posted three weeks after yours, I’m curious what your thoughts are.

[@RachelTheAnarchist]

I am so fucking high right now

[@TheAmusingOddities]

RachelTheAnarchist yes!

[@yusdrum91]

duuuuuddeeeee

[@kailen98]

RachelTheAnarchist yup

[@richardgonzalez2698]

yooooo lmao

[@LanceCampeau]

shut the fuck up.

[@shivaschimera6101]

Moving transparent animated 3d layer's that convey NEW information through strange pattern alignment's, alignment's that assimilate new geometric data to the singularity. This provides a NEW experience to the singularity through feeling and calculation. This is the higher dimension..... The dimension of NEW data. Find it.... Anything less is not worth living for.

[@wilderbeast9368]

1-3 - Space; Coordinates among a varied list of positions. 4-6 - Time; Coordinates among a varied list of moments. 7-9 - Reality; Coordinates among a varied list of beginnings. 10-12 - Existence; Coordinates among a varied list of tales.

[@noangelsaroundme]

Freewill: we can't change our destiny, but we can choose the destiny we want to us.

[@Muzztein]

noangelsaroundme epic thought

[@alexanderm5728]

+noangelsaroundme Come again? Choosing our destiny is the same thing as changing it. If I go to a restaurant, and if they have a set menu but I'm allowed to choose (say) my dessert if I wish, I'm changing what I'm having by choosing it.

[@noangelsaroundme]

***** Yes, a single destiny is. Although, there may be an infinite number of alternative. However, I got no idea how quantum fluctuation may alter the space-time and hence void the destiny. What I certainly know is that our universe results from QF and after wich, as the physical mass of our universe have grew exponentially the quantum efect became very small. profmattstrassler.com/articles-and-posts/particle-physics-basics/quantum-fluctuations-and-their-energy/

[@brianmcnellis5512]

noangelsaroundme You just contradicted yourself. Are you saying you can plan for the future but don't try to predict the outcome?

[@fclssknldgsekr4844]

Glad I stumbled upon this one.

[@sorryforbatenglish]

23:18 oh no... Rob Bryanton is a brony

[@10thdim]

+Adrian Moment haha, a little surprise for my granddaughters.

[@цветок-ш7п]

10thdim​ 😂😂

[@caveprime5370]

+10thdim ha ha, that makes more sense :)

[@lucabaar1]

+Adrian Moment ...Powerful implications... .......Ohhhhhhhhhh... Master of subtleties

[@GrampaClan]

+10thdim how old are your grannddaughters and how did they sit through all of this? Not saying its boring but i mean....

[@samanthasaysmoon11]

I'm writing this at 7:17am. Just woke up from a horrible nightmare. Was floating on my back down an underground river. Pitch black. Saw a woman's face & started freaking out. Next thing I know I'm awake. Wife is shaking me telling me I was yelling for help in my sleep. I look at my phone & what do I see? This damn video. This goddam video. I love it. But falling asleep to it gives me nightmares.

[@10thdim]

Wow, glad to hear you love the video. But why do you think it’s giving you nightmares?

[@PenguinPandaZero]

I got lost after about half way into the 7th.

[@Andy-er3vn]

just sayin w....t.....f

[@MultiGoban]

I understand the 1~8, but can't imagine the zeroth and the ninth. I can however Imagine the 10th.

[@PenguinPandaZero]

MultiGoban the 0th is a point. no length, no width, if you zoom in 1000x it looks like the same point. if you zoom out 200000000x it looks like a the same point.

[@MultiGoban]

***** I know... But what is it? Why is the 0th =/= nothing?

[@PenguinPandaZero]

MultiGoban Meh. I guess you just need a good imagination. It's hard to describe. It actually does not exist. It is just a representation of something we can not perceive.

[@blondefire79]

Did anyone else feel hypnotized at around 14:00 ?

[@kwillldnaaasty4458]

Doing lsd and dmt a handful of times, following along with this video was surprisingly easy. Strong lsd trips let you see the loops of the 5th dimension. Super triply stuff

[@Knightimex]

I see it like this: Dimension 0 (allows anything and everything to exist) Dimension 123 (vision existence of all things visible even if it's too small to see ourselves.) Dimension 456 (time) Dimension 789 (properties) Dimension 10 ( IS The existence of everything) D-0 is just as ever important as D-10 The higher the dimension the more extravagant it's properties. There could be more than 11 dimensions but there has to be a point where the next dimension is far far more complex than the last which eventually limits the threshold of understanding and comprehension.

[@sterlingweston]

Very succinct summary. I agree, with what you said, albeit an oversimplification.

[@Gzanothor]

Blew my MIND the moment I fully understood this, so the reality we see around us is like the weird images the 2d people perceive, but instead of a shifting line we see shifting "solids" moving in a linear fashion.

[@Kradrling]

At 41:00, you stated that you cannot have the fourth dimension without any of the dimensions below it. However, it is possible to have a two-dimensional space which experiences change throughout time. Simply take a two-dimensional slice of our universe and extend this area to include the same plane in every frame of our universe. Or you can look at an image from your eye, which is two dimensional, yet every point in the picture is captured from a different point in time because of the time it takes for light to reach our eyes. Also, why should we stop at the tenth dimension? The tenth dimension is merely the limit of the comprehensible space. What if there are other phenomena which we are incapable of imagining that allow existence to extend beyond the tenth dimension? Those are my only unsettled thoughts about this theory. Thank you for this amazing educational experience.

[@10thdim]

Kradrling "Fourth dimension" as a phrase is tricky for us: if we use it to refer to our experience of time, then it appears to be very different from the other collections of dimensions. With my project I'm trying to get people to see how "time" as we experience it is only a limited subset of what is actually a full spatial dimension, the one that is at right angles to the three that it includes, and that viewpoint is directly related to us being constructed from atoms and molecules that are confined to a 3D membrane. I've used the 2D slice example in my videos to talk further about this - I believe it makes sense that for a 2D world "time" would be a subset of the third spatial dimension, where you experience one 2D frame after another to allow for change to occur. To extend your idea further, any dimension would have static "frames", each representing that dimension in a certain state, and stacking different states for any dimension one next to the other (using the "next dimension above") would be how change can occur for that dimension. Thanks for thinking deeply about these ideas!

[@Jhonyaugust]

+10thdim Music could explain fourth dimension ? If you think music is a "thing" you hear when the time pass, but you cant hear all the notes of the music at the same time, if you hear everthing at the same time this became noise(or blurry images) So you have to use memory to understand the whole. We have to use memory to understand time too.

[@donniexl1033]

+10thdim So does that mean that "time" in a sense is just relative to the dimension. Meaning, that for every dimension, change is only affected by the dimension above

[@10thdim]

Exactly, that's what I've been proposing with this project. And time as we know it is a direction, not a dimension. You need to consider time's opposing direction, "anti-time" if you want to consider it a dimension. And if we're using words like length width and depth, then "duration" would be a better corresponding word to describe our experience of the fourth dimension as creatures made of 3D atoms and molecules.

[@SongDesigner]

+10thdim So are animated movies longer than 1 second "techinally" considered 3D?

[@maxwillson]

We are pobably in a complex sims game and don't even know it ahahaha

[@TexstyleQuest]

Max Willson they call it the matrix

[@owencampbell4947]

That's all about life, "get to next level"...

[@EmeraldEyesEsoteric]

You mean this world? Where 99% are poor, and the 1% are rich. What kind of simulation does that even amount to? Who the fuck wants to simulate being poor? The God / designer of this video game ought to get his ass down here, and die on a cross for the sins of the world. Oh but we tried that, and all it did was make things worse. It took us through the Dark Age and into the Inquisition.

[@pigbenis6971]

like a better version of a sims game and gta?

[@oblamovadvanced5956]

Damnnn! That's just what i'm thinking when i watched the video!

[@NotSoNormal1987]

I always come back to watch this every few months or so. Everything is so clearly explained.

[@minoanlight4545]

First time watched this 5 years ago...and now I am rewatching it again...still amazing as it was back then. :)

[@10thdim]

Thanks!

[@minoanlight4545]

No prob, thank you, too. You earned a sub, even though your channel is not active anymore. I like to think about this...

[@MultiGoban]

Are psychedelic useful in understanding this abstract mind experiment, or is being sober the best way to go?

[@doomslayer7719]

Wisdom is the best way to go, actually. That, and self understanding.

[@VinnyXL420]

Do drugs! drugs are good! LSD for the mind and cannabis for the body.

[@ryanm7263]

Psychedelics are an efficient means of expanding the boundaries of thought such that multi-dimensional contemplations become more accessible, but because of their inherently fleeting nature such agents can actually obstruct the development of meaningful understanding. The correct way to use psychedelics as tools is rarely and in very large doses.

[@MultiGoban]

Ryan MacFarlane "The correct way to use psychedelics as tools is rarely and in very large doses." I agree. And when doing so, it should be done spiritually not for fun(even though it can be fun, fun must not be the motivator).

[@dodad41]

i can fairly say i've done every drug, acid shrooms coke meth pcp..... even on the most out of body acid trip, i come to the same conclusions about the universe and how were all connected sitting at home sober doing some deep thinking. "You can get alot higher without drugs, than with them." *Fear and loathing in Las Vegas

[@deehin3137]

I think Rob has an intuitive natural understand of hyperdimensional physics that he may not be able to completely describe mathematically or perfectly specifically, but it's something that science is moving toward or bickering about in their resistance to. Science may not see it yet and nobody may be able to properly explain it yet, but I think Rob is on the right path.

[@andrewsciandra4848]

I remember watching this when I was in high school and this video has dominated my thoughts almost on a daily basis ever since. Each time I come back to rewatch the video, maybe for the nostalgia or just to refresh; I realise my own life experiences and education further validate the concepts in this video, for me. I am still watching this in 2024 and my kids will be watching this in 2034 and so on. That is the reality I have chosen to observe and I hope they do to.

[@10thdim]

@@andrewsciandra4848 "my kids will be watching this in 2034" is a beautiful thought. I turned 70 this month so your forward-thinking words really touched my heart, thank you!

[@pizzapourtous]

then 11th dimension is where you can understand those 10 dimensions and 12th dimension is where you can fall in love but there is no 13th dimension because you can't understand love

[@Kedar752]

14th dimension is the friendzone.

[@2serveand2protect]

Very nice! :) ...although I must admit that from the 15th minute onwards my head started to ache...quite a LOT!... Thanks for uploading!- thumb up & subbed! Hve a nice ay everybody! ;)

[@xFirebird925x]

Thanks for uploading! I just can't, however, refrain from posting the possible reactions to this video from people around me. Alright, so starting with me... Me: COOL! My engineer dad: wtf is this. My mom: stop dreaming now. My Bio/Chem/Phys teacher: you can't do experiments to prove this. My Literature teacher: I'm sorry, but Wikipedia isn't a valid source. :P

[@NYESmusic]

Well, ignorance is the majority...

[@THConnoisseur]

So true

[@iamamoghalfmanhalfdog5325]

is that 5th dimensional thinking

[@AirmanKolberg]

I mean, we HAVE detected gravitational pull from other universes. So your bio/chem/physics teacher is an idiot, and probably shouldn't be- wait... you said teacher, not professor, I'm sorry. Okay, never mind, I guess they can still teach. Our standards are much higher for professors, but teacher? That's fine. lol

[@daigoyoda]

12:44 0th Dimension 22:41 1st Dimension 26:52 2nd Dimension 33:20 3rd Dimension 38:36 4th Dimension 47:58 5th Dimension 57:01 6th Dimension 1:07:37 7th Dimension 1:20:08 8th Dimension 1:31:05 9th Dimension

[@Woenkomat2]

Who's watching that in 2024

[@zoookx]

Sorry, 3743 here...

[@kolasis4994]

I’ve never forgot this video ever since 2015 seeing it for the first time

[@kimanderson4171]

May 2 , 2024 . 3:30 am . I wonder if I can make it to the end. I'm at the 5th dimension so far so good. I will save it just in case now. 😅

[@cosmicchicken3634]

Yo

[@MajesticStriker113]

I watched this like 6-8 years ago lol

[@kongmagneto12]

This is why I love physics!

[@ugandanknucklesdiedsostopu3937]

A single dot, A line, Four lines connected to make a square, Two squares connected to make a cube, Six cubes put into a hyper cube, That's all I know

[@mandala314]

"Flatland" is an awesome book, I loved reading it as a kid. The sequel, "Flatterland" is quite good, also. Really helps to visualize mathematical thinking.

[@AlexSKS]

Dash @ 23:17

[@eishagraves6780]

This is interesting !!

[@filipsperl]

This is WRONG, don't listen to this, people! There are spacial dimensions and there are time dimension. All the videos of this kind are mixing it together. Plus, we haven't described anything above a line-like time, a plane-like time would be the result of multiverse, which isn't even near to be confirmed/rejected. There can be any number of spacial dimensions as you like, but our universe probably has 4 dimensions. Oh, virtual or subatomic particles might actually exist in 11 spacial dimensions. Read the facts, before you fill your head with false information.

[@yesnoidk]

Prove the video wrong with facts yourself, and prove your own response correct, before jumping to conclusions

[@notorioushkm97]

Timestamps: 13:00 *0th Dimension* 22:54 *1st Dimension* 26:52 *2nd Dimension* 33:23 *3rd Dimension* 38:38 *4th Dimension* 48:10 *5th Dimension* 57:16 *6th Dimension* 1:07:52 *7th Dimension* 1:20:23 *8th Dimension* 1:31:20 *9th Dimension*

[@MrWaphead]

I really tried to understand this...but I ended up crying like a baby; like my younger self who used to exist in the fith dimension. And then the narrator said that Michael Jackson could still be alive and I thought "I'm in danger".

[@Kedar752]

Don't worry. In 5th dimension your other self understood the video. Cheers

[@bryandonovanjr.7941]

So... "DIMENSIONS of the GAPS!"

[@ShadowCoyoteDKM]

The ultimate question is where does consciousness arise? In the 0-10th dimension? As a human, we are conscious of our body and our thoughts. As an animal, we would be conscious of a different body and thoughts. Are non-ling beings conscious of things that are completely alien to us, or are the conscious at all? And if not, where does consciousness arise? It is not our brain. Our brains give us things to be conscious of, but does not generate consciousness itself. That is the ultimate question.

[@kristenfriend7514]

consciousness exists simply as vibrations. It exists everywhere. The air we breathe has consciousness! Though it is vastly different in expression and experience than what we have. At least in the 2nd dimension (plants, trees) one does not experience individuality but a group consciousness. I see a pattern of awareness outside of the "self" growing from the 1st to the 12th dimension. And these dimensions layer within each other. They are a scale of vibration. Consciousness can exist as a light sphere in the 6th dimension, for example. Our solid bodies are vibrated into existence by our electromagnetic field that surrounds them. That's what I was thinking this morning, anyway :)

[@ShadowCoyoteDKM]

There is nothing in the form of a vibration that says it is self-aware or should be. That doesn't explain how the awareness arises.

[@kristenfriend7514]

Well, consciousness needn't be self-aware. Geez, I didn't answer that original question. I've heard it described as a "thought" within the god-brain. I think a better analogy would be plucking a guitar string. Something functions as a root cause of vibration that initiates the big bang and our own set of physics and laws that apply uniquely to this universe. And supposedly, consciousness is infinite. So all of the universes including our own would have no discernible "start" as there is no linear time or entropy outside of a certain scale of existence..

[@kristenfriend7514]

I was saying the same thing 6 months ago. Things are changing fast, aren't they?

[@kristenfriend7514]

I study Astrology and immediately found parallels with that. Excellent. I also loved the poems :)

[@theultimategodofgaming3200]

For anyone who has trouble understanding the difference between the 5th and 6th dimension, like I did, this is what I believe the difference is, hopefully put a bit more succinctly: The 5th dimension under this model is not only the scope of probability for objects, but also the scope of causal connection between objects. Objects in reality are not actually 3-dimensional objects, but 5-dimensional objects that can only observe a single 3-dimensional "point" of their probability "plane". "Moving" through the 5th dimension simply means observing a different possibility on that plane, and so we are constantly moving through the 5th dimension without realizing it. The world where you robbed a bank, and the world where you shot up a school, both exist on your probability plane, but they are (hopefully) not your reality because you chose not to observe those possibilities. Additionally, your plane can, and often does, overlap with others, the actions you could potentially take may affect other objects, and so you become a part of their probability plane. This applies vice versa as well, you could be affected by the actions of another person, or object, or natural phenomenon. There is a possibility where you become a bloodthirsty killer after someone shot your dog, a possibility that is affected by the actions of another person. In this way, 5D planes can, at least partially, occupy the same space within a greater 5D causal "slice". The 6th dimension, on the other hand, is the phase space including all probability planes. If a probability plane represents the scope of possibilities for a single object within a system, then the 6D phase space represents the scope of possibilities for the entire system itself. All possibilities for the entire universe are represented here, even ones that are completely causally disconnected from each other. Your probability plane and the probability plane of a dinosaur both co-exist in this space, even though they do not causally overlap with each other. Imagine the 6D phase space as a "cube" containing infinite 5D causal "slices". In regards to the temporal axes, we are Flatlanders, unable to move between these "slices", however a hypothetical 6D being would be able to. They would be able to go from observing a universe like ours to observing a universe where the dinosaurs never went extinct just as easily as we would choose whether to have a ham or turkey sandwich for lunch. Edit: Holy crap I was not expecting this to be pinned. I mostly commented this as a future point of reference for myself, was not expecting you to notice it. Thanks!

[@10thdim]

@@theultimategodofgaming3200 Nice! Here’s another interesting idea to throw into the mix - in his 2014 book The Science of Interstellar, Nobel-winning physicist Kip Thorne describes the multiple causally connected “4D world tubes” available to us in the fifth dimension using similar logical reasoning to what you present here, and to what my project has been showing since its 2006 launch. Thorne then says it’s fair game to lump any dimensions beyond that together and call that “The Bulk”. With the visualization I present here, each additional dimension beyond the fifth does indeed move us further and further “outside” of the reality we are observing. Why? Because these are all spatial dimensions, so each new dimension adds another set of possible information patterns that are orthogonal in a new way to the dimensions that have come before. I have insisted that any formulations where some dimensions are spatial and some are not is mixing apples and oranges, not logically consistent. As 3D creatures, we only get to see into the 4th and 5th dimension one 3D Planck frame at a time, this is why we don’t see the timeless nature of the 4th dimensional world tube that causally connects us to the beginning and end of the universe, and could be an explanation for why some theories propose that the fifth dimension is “curled up at the Planck length”. That interconnected quality of our 5D reality you describe so well becomes even more obvious when we remember that there are not separate wavefunctions for every particle - there is only the wavefunction of the universe, calculated in five dimensions. While Hawking talked about this occurring in “imaginary time, at right angles to spacetime”, that’s just another way of describing the fifth spatial dimension. This, of course, is what we see happen to Matthew McConaughey’s character in the movie Interstellar, which had Kip Thorne as executive producer and science advisor. In that movie we see him elevated to a fifth dimensional viewpoint, where he can see those branching possibilities of Everett’s Many Worlds Interpretation of quantum mechanics, extending out from each other in the orthogonal 4D geometries of the tesseract.

[@mabehal-zuqyadeek8593]

My brain exploded after the 5th dimension.

[@KippurCatArts]

That's because... nvm

[@panpunkt5185]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/rYqtnYyoeMifjLs

[@user-im5ru7vm9i]

My brain is dead. Guess I'll eat cabbage.

[@lhaviland8602]

10:30 always breaks me lol.

[@SirOlivo]

This video changed my life years ago. It’s nice rewatching it’s from time to time.

[@OMGitsTerasu]

so long story short, 4D is plank length selfies

[@Paskaloth]

I just couldn't see someone imagining dragons as radioactive to a world view, it's just an idea!

[@RainbowDashie15]

Lol random rainbow dash

[@rotisseriepossum]

I only saw a clip of this years ago, but that clip alone sparked my interest in physics and astronomy etc; finding out that that clip was part of a two-hour movie, as an adult, is v exciting, I’m so happy

[@warmachine1665]

So, from what I've gathered here today, there's a universe where I'm the Batman? Not saying that I'm not in this universe... You've never seen me and Batman in the same room before. No, that's not all I got from it.

[@lifeinthemoment3999]

LMAO

[@YourWealthCome]

I want Microsoft to make augmented reality to really emerse my self in this. I understand but I don't.

[@DemoniteBL]

Soo... Please don't hate me for this, but I just watched the little thing at the beginning and the zeroth dimension. I think (I'm very very confused) I understood every dimension except the 10th. Is it right if I say the zeroth and the tenth are the same but still the opposite? Like zero and infinity? If zero is a point if everything in it, just being neutralized by itself and ten is... well what is ten then? Everything with everything, so time too? After writing this I'm even more confused. What was I going to say again?

[@TheDAAbercrombie]

the 10th dim is the observation of the 9th. "take the 9th dim and conceive of it"

[@easterdeer]

I think it's as Daniel said. Because, under this paradigm, we can always view the total 'space' occupied by a dimension as a single point, it stands to reason that, if the 9th dimension is the largest one in this system, we can still view its entirety as consisting of a single point. We'd call the 10th dimension the logical idea that it would be possible to view the entirety of the 9th dimension as a point. There are no other points in this 10th dimension as the 9th consists of everything possible- the 10th is just the conceivable 'space' in which these possibilities 'sit'. There wouldn't be another dimension 'containing' the 10th because the 10th only has one point to hold. It's an incredibly neat theory and I hope that something comes of it but, as ever, you have to take it with a multi-dimensional pinch of salt so all we can do is wait to see what new evidence comes up. : )

[@natel3250]

I was actually thinking that exact same thing about the 10th and the 0th dimension. They seem like they could be the same thing, which is pretty cool to think about philosophically.

[@WizzRacing]

The idea are abstract in theory. I see the Zero not as a dimension but the first cause. The paradigm is no dimension exist there. Once you have matter energy you get the higher dimension from it. There could be Eleven dimensions if you add a second dimension of time which string theory includes.

[@TheDavidp82]

No politics, no race, no name calling, no insulting, a couple of compliments between total strangers, and general respect, with a little bit of theoretical learning tossed in. The best comment and replies in the history of KZbin. Oh, wait, 3 years ago. If you guys are still around in this dimension, man, things went to shit.

[@dandweller]

Watching this Just gave me an entirely new perspective on reality! I'm so Thankful for This Video!

[@danielbohm4452]

This video is a perfect example of how to completely misunderstand dimensions. A 'flat-lander' won't see anything, ever. A two dimensional plane has no existence in itself. The 'many worlds' interpretation of physics has only arisen because because of a lack of knowledge: "We cannot conceive of what might collapse a quantum wave function, so every possibility must happen!" No

[@Dean1234563]

Smoke Dmt in the peak of an acid trip and tell me anything isn't possible, any explanation that man imagines is just a false observation.

[@NeoNoggie]

You only say that because you know nothing about quantum mechanics. Please do not speak ever again.

[@Jnic]

I totally agree with dean, in that nothing is impossible, besides, if the many worlds interpretation is wrong we have nothing to even closely describe some of the fundemental natures of quantum physics. e.g the double slit experiment or schrödinger's cat. I'm not saying it's the only right solution, i'm just saying you should be open minded around physics. people once thought black holes dindt exist, even after they were proven by Einstein.

[@Flagship87871414]

Jannic Ohlsen Sorry, but in that case we have nothing to even closely describe some of the fundemental natures of quantum physics. Even Feynman said so.

[@Flagship87871414]

Daniel Bohm While I agree that their treatment of the effects of dimensionality on our reality is a bit whimsical, I'm curious - why do you think that their geometric interpretations are bunk too?

[@nekrofilzombi]

My eyes are bleeding

[@redstoneking1535]

Just to inform watchers. This video seems to be inspired by physics, but it doesn't seem to care about weather its theories are true or not. If the guy in the video likes an idea, he pretends like it's true, no matter what science says.

[@jhoughjr1]

Physicists don't care about "truth". They care about predictive utility.

[@prkycck4445]

I dont know if this was one of your intentions or not but i want to thank you. Your video here opened my eyes to abusive relationships i have been in. Your video has taught me how to look at my relationships from a different angle. I dont know if this makes sense, but a web of lies makes one think that it is the only web that exists. But its not. Love can be found and real truth exists amidst hatred and lies if we can learn to look into a different direction so we can find a web of truth. Once again thank you.

[@MaximusActivus]

If you say that the 4th dimension is a long strand of multiple 3rd dimensions which allow change, then is it not like a camera recording something at a certain frames per second? If this is true, can we imagine what's in between those frames in the 4th dimension?

[@10thdim]

Good question! The frames per second is defined by Planck's constant. This means that "between" the frames has no meaning, because nothing can be shorter/smaller than a Planck length or a unit of Planck time.

[@AlphaFoxDelta]

noobslayeru Yeah, that's because you have to accept that space-time is quantized to understand the theory

[@thekingoffiction]

10thdim What evidence do we have that space time exists other then an objects frequency or speed. As far as I knew it took a physical phenomenon in order for there ever be a frequency and speed so I dont understand how space time is present as a quantum explanation before there is ever something physical to create a interaction in reality.

[@Chris-b-2]

10thdim The plank length is not the smallest/shortest thing possible, it is simply a theoretical limit to our measurement capabilities. A more accurate definition of a 4th dimension that noobslayeru suggests is time combined with our 3d space, in which time is a temporal dimension and not a spatial one. A spatial 4th dimension can be though of as 3D 'frames', but it would be very similar to our comparison between 2 and 3 dimensional space, in which we don't view 3 dimensions as a frame-set of 2 dimensions, but as a complete system.

[@robertfennis6088]

noobslayeru the video is bullshit

[@DavidSaiyan]

Okay, the whole 4th dimension thing doesn't make any sense. You don't need to get to the 4th dimension to have time. a 2d world can have change and in turn have time in the second dimension as well. It's stretching it quite a bit to call the 4th dimension spatial and dependent on the previous 3 dimensions.

[@dlaskin92]

The fourth dimension isn't "time" as we experience it. It is a plane in which a being exists containing (and therefore traveling through any point of) all points in time.

[@DavidSaiyan]

dlaskin92 I understand, but how would that said being be able to travel to all points in time, or do anything unless that dimension was also within time? Time is a constant across multiple dimensions. Even if we had a 4D shape that represented our entire "timeline" then the 4d creature would have a timeline shape of his own. Which means that time is the dimension above, but I do not think that is the case at all.

[@V1kToo]

David Saiyan I think that's why M Theory states there is 10 dims+time to wrap them all...

[@samirm]

were those my little ponies? whyyyyyyyyyyyy?

[@Refalm]

Your avatar accurately described my feeling at 23:20

[@samirm]

:)

[@CadetGriffin]

The Rainbow Dash thing was cute though.

[@contessa.adella]

I watched these vids years ago….they still hold true. Rob’s vision is not a raft of calculations, but instead a model, a tool, a means of conception. These brilliant visualisations assist one to gain a broader understanding and an appreciation of the unseen possibilities. Add these presentations to your mental toolkit and use them not in isolation, but in conjunction with other theoretical understandings of space-time, probabilities and such related fundamentals we mortals struggle to grasp. It is a journey…enjoy it!😁

[@10thdim]

Thank you for your kind words! Beautifully put.

[@Plutofar0ut]

I really wish you didn't use Wikipedia as a source lol, but this is very intriguing in its entirety. 👍

[@Minizemful]

Well its not like there are many other places to find information on the speculation and conjecture of complex multi-dimensional theory that have any kind of credit at all.

[@ZzRvXzZ]

teachers be like that.

[@DiaboloMootopia]

the statement at 3:30 or so is wrong. Antimatter is not moving backwards in time. It's the same as matter, but the electrical charges are opposite.

[@AlinNemet]

LordNugget1603 Pseudo scientist?? He won a Nobel prize in physics :D

[@DiaboloMootopia]

Alin Nemet No, he didn't win one. But I also don't agree that Kaku is "pseudo".

[@LemurianLepidopteran]

23:17 23:20 I see what you did there.

[@Era_Playz255]

whats funny is i used to watch this around age 9 years old all the time and I forgot about it until now. glad to be back.

[@jgsh8062]

just imagining what a 7 dimensional creature would see... O_O

[@KibyNykraft]

We only exist in the "4th" dimension (a dynamical energy variability through cosmic inflation). The rest of "dimensional numbers" = theoretical hogwash. At tiny scales, energy vibration takes place dynamically, not in terms of categories. However entropy will also increase by default cosmically, so the formation of matter being slowly less and less internally binding, will reform matter/known energy into Heat death.

[@danielvutran]

' The rest of "dimensional numbers" = theoretical hogwash ' Do time

[@NoNickname9090]

I saw your videos 1, by 1. I'm here to comment after seeing them all. Sir... Your theories fit 'right' in with what Spirit Science was saying about the 'real' Earth history. They mention that we spoke to 'gods' who reside in the 11th dimension. They stated that these 'gods' can create things, but to them it happens instantly. This coincides with the idea of Last Thursdayism. To these gods, the 'universe' was created last Thursday, but to us it felt like it was created YEARS ago. This also coincides with how you say things are spherical, the dimensions. An 11th dimensional being may be able to 'move' this sphere and 'draw' on it, like a canvas. Their ideas literally become reality. This is why at the 10th dimension, every possibility imaginable is there. You have the right idea when you ask, what happens after we go through every possibility? Well this is why we can't think outside the 10th dimension. You become a 'god' once you become, or get an understanding of the 11th dimension. It's too complex. Consciously, people are able to go to these different dimensions. This is what people call 'astro-projection'. Physically we will need to bend space. This will be the science and technology aspect. Both proves each other. (My theory at this point) I find the thought exciting, though overwhelming. In Spirit Science's video of the 'real' Earth history, they say [paraphrasing] we can consciously speak to these beings, but physically we are not there yet. They did say we're already in the 4th dimension, which coincides with what you're saying. How we're in the 4th dimension. I like the idea, actually. Because if we're in the 4th dimension, that would explain why 'weird' things happen in life. Because we're getting to the point where we can physically do anything. Many are are the point where they can consciously do anything. But bringing their vessel with them, or getting a new vessel, is something I feel people can't do yet. Again, this is just me combing your theories, with others to form my own. I'm open-minded to all thoughts about what I'm saying and believe. It's how I got to your videos in the first place. I completely understand what you're saying, actually. I pictured it in my head, and made the sphere of life. This coincides with my random thought I had about the "Circle of Time', which you explained in the 4th dimension. I made the 6th dimension the same thing you're making the 10th dimension. I believe I had my dimensions wrong. You had the same thought process, but you split them up more. I had the 4th dimension being *your* time line with every possibility you see. I made the 5th dimension someone else's timeline. So the cross, or right angle, is when you meet someone. So by time I'm at the 6th dimension, you're talking about beings of creation, or god. But from what it sounds like, 'god' is in the 11th dimension. Again, these are my beliefs. I'd love to talk more about this in person with people who are aware life is more than just the 3rd dimension. I'm loving these videos!! I suggest people look into astro-projection. I feel that's the key to understanding this all better. Ah!! Life just got way more fun!! Free will exists!!

[@GrampaClan]

+Izaya Evarez but where are your maths

[@NoNickname9090]

***** Maths in what? Is there a mathematical equation to say why a particular medicine works? Math is just a language, as is body language, as is spoken language. I can't speak Math, so I can't translate my thoughts to math. That's what saddens me. So many people speak Math, but I don't. I'd love to have my 'math equations', but I do not. This is why I state it's all theory. I let people know I have no evidence, but the 'coincidences' in my life, and my experiences. But the sad thing is, if I record an 'event', the internet will think it's fake. So it's still not possible to get proof unless you experience it yourself. Which once you do, only the 'crazy' people will believe you. To me, you're asking for math when I'm talking about instinct. Can math explain instinct? I originally meant that question rhetorically, but now I'm actually wondering. LoL!! EDIT: To be honest, my thoughts just 'came' to me. I just heard 'theories', and came up with my own. This knowledge that's being spoken feels rudimentary. That's why I don't have math. It's like asking 'But how do you know all cars need oil changes?' It feels like it's common sense to me. I know that sounds unfathomable, but that's why I don't have math. It's just... to simple to understand that I can't really break it down anymore. Is that weird?

[@GrampaClan]

be a science fiction writer then.... no maths, all theories

[@NoNickname9090]

***** I've actually thought about that. I'm considering writing a sci-fi book. I may throw a movie idea. I came up with one. The Outage: What happens when all the electricity in humanity suddenly goes away, and we face an alien threat? Humanity is on the brink of extinction. We must learn to work together to somehow fight this threat.

[@NoNickname9090]

Albert Einstein Given the crazy stuff I believe in, I am SO mad your name is 'Albert Einstein'. LoL!! It's just far more 'coincidental' for me. I tend to have very dark stories. I may send some in for Creepy Pasta. Do you play League of Legends? I've been making my own lore for it, as I play it. The lore ties in as to what happens to the characters point-of-view while playing. You see, we, as a summoner, see what we believe, but what's really happening? Maybe I'll do a KZbin series or something. The ideas generally sound better, than they are read.

[@2000benboy]

why are there only 10 dimensions why not 11

[@acepaynee376]

its 11 0 - 10 are the eleven dimensions

[@WizzRacing]

Zero is not a dimension, it's concluded to be the first cause. Infinite or finite and unchanging to the rest of the lower dimensions that mathematics can discover so far.

[@dill23216]

Claude Rains Cant have the 1st dimension without the Zeroth dimension

[@IaMYoungWalker22]

Theres like 30 dimensions that they know of

[@acepaynee376]

IaMYoungWalker22 I dont think so, cuz if i recall correctly michio kaku said anything above 11 would collapse

[@bryandraughn9830]

I wouldn't agree that we can "look back through time". We are only aware of the moment when the light strikes the retina. No matter how long that light may have traveled. Great video!

[@10thdim]

Thanks! In my video "Light Has No Speed" I talk about the astonishing idea that, from a photon's perspective, its emission from a star many light years away and reception at your retina are simultaneous events. But from our perspective, that photon took years of travel to get to us!

[@10thdim]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/oaS3n5p_jLehjdU

[@BornofIron]

sigh people harassing people about religion... if only people can justify for both... fucking sad and pathetic how we harass others for a belief.

[@stevenortiz8718]

***** I am guessing you're an atheist, i suppose you 'believe' in evolution as well right?

[@BornofIron]

please no toxic commentary for the love of fuck...

[@VJScope]

steven ortiz Why wouldn't I believe in evolution?

[@stevenortiz8718]

VJScope I guess i read that guys comment wrong and thought he meant people are stupid for having a belief in something, but honestly, i wasn't even talking to you VJfuckingscope, so now get the fuck out my conversation which was misunderstood from the start, i just love how people love to get into other people's conversation without even knowing what's going on, and this is for me as well for getting into ye roddy's conversation without even knowing what he was trying to say, peace, bitches! *I won't bother to reply back*

[@BornofIron]

Maturity, ladies and gentleman at it's finest.

[@filipe_paixao]

when you realize he is going to start talking about the 10° dimension when the 10° minute start

[@Skatinima]

DISCLAIMER: I have to say this: this video is not scientificallly accurate. A lot of theories in this video are just that, theories. Plus, the author is no authority on the subject of Hyperspace and Quantum mechanics. He's a musician, not a physicist. If you don't believe me, google Rob Bryanton. Somehow the only links between him and physics are his blog and video channel. As a service to Science, don't take this guy seriously. It's better to be ignorant than to be ignorantly wrong.

[@TheVariableConstant]

I'm fairly certain the man who brought the world the iPhone, iOS and the Mac never took a course in engineering and probably never did any serious programming. A lot of progress has been due to contributions by people working outside their primary field.

[@Skatinima]

You're correct. He never did any serious programming. He just told other people what to do. He was the leader behind Apple, not the mind behind the enginnering, design, and programming. He had the ideas and told other people to execute them, then he would put his name on the patents. And speaking of the video, if you haven't deeply studied physics you are very likely to induce in cognitive mistakes given to ignorance about the subject. And let's think about something, do you really think this guy is going to present with some new idea that nobody in physics world, who dedicate their lives to the subject of dimensions and the beginning of the universe, thought of? These are all theories that other physicists have thought of, and he's making an interpretation of them. H'es not innovating, he's just a parrot that doesn't know what he's talking about.

[@Zachary-md1ft]

You act like you're smart when you spell "scientifically" with three l's.

[@Skatinima]

Zachary Little lol nice try, bro

[@daxross2930]

I think it’s best to have an open mind. And not be rigid to dogma. I mean... I can certainly entertain many ideas with excepting them as fact. And you know what that does for me. It opens worlds. How do you think big discoveries come about? From being rigid and saying “I wouldn’t take this seriously”. Cmon man

[@DHARMA252]

Came back to this masterpiece after a few years. Really enjoyed every time I watched this video this time included.

[@snouie5687]

First word in the title sums up the whole video. ''IMAGINING''.