Imagining the "Zeroth" Dimension

My new book is now available on Amazon!
www.amazon.com/Start-Point-bu...
For more info and other products go to tenthdimension.com .
Twitter: 10thdim
Instagram: 10thdim
Blog: tenthdimension.com/blog
Patreon: patreon.com/10thdim
Thanks to Discovery Channel News for calling Imagining the Tenth Dimension - 2012 Version a "Gotta See Video"!
To read along with this entry go to imaginingthetenthdimension.blo...
www.amazon.com/Zero-Biography-...
imaginingthetenthdimension.blo...
www.everythingforever.com
imaginingthetenthdimension.blo...
www.tenthdimension.com/store
www.tenthdimension.com/digital

[@Shun101010]

"Some cultures chose to live without it" You mean they had NONE of this? You could say they had ZERO interest.

[@foosic1742]

Aha... HahahHAHAHAWUAHAHUHUEHUEHUEHEUHEUEH

[@khaldrogo1656]

+Jaqen H'ghar Perhaps they unlocked the clue that the 0 and infinite are the exact same thing. Perhaps there is no need know it, since the ending just leads back to the beginning. Perhaps just living in the now is the true answer.

[@cerulean22b69]

Jaqen H'ghar hahaha! Awesome puns!

[@masterdef2209]

No

[@DIO-nm2ut]

bum bum tshh

[@QuakeGamerROTMG]

I just finished a video about turning spheres inside out, I don't have what it takes to go through another mind fucking video.

[@scarose]

SAME

[@BugCatLove]

saame

[@chachthagoat1629]

ahaha same here I fell like that video was bait... got me thinking and know I feel like ima be on this part of youtube for awhile.

[@people287]

That's what got me back onto the chain of these type of videos :D

[@knivesknivesknives]

same

[@alexkuhn5078]

it's just like color. White is usually considered the absence of color, yet it consists of a combination of all possible colors.

[@nil981]

Alex Kuhn same thing with the color black.

[@bigagabriel]

you are mixing light with material color. In light, white is the sum of visible spectrum (if im not mistaken) and black is the absence. And with material/chemical you can play like that with colours, since white would lose to some colour (when it would actually both move to some middle of the color spectrum. And putting colors together would make it get closer to black (more like a dark brown). Yet black is usually some extract of something that is black.

[@Spoon-man_]

How can I get white if I mix all the colours I only get black.... help!!

[@stephennalewanyj6904]

Alex Kuhn ...wow! It’s been five years and here I am! Sorry but I understand that black is considered to be the absence of color, not white.

[@granddesign1]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/gZqzfoJ9ithmbMk Watch this :).

[@MrAckeh]

What if 0th dimension is the 10th dimension? Like instead of thinking of the dimensions as moving in a pattern where everything is perpendicular, it returns back to 0 at the end.

[@10thdim]

+Arnold Christian Yes, there's no doubt about it, this approach to visualizing the dimensions starts from a point of indeterminate size, and ends with a point of indeterminate size. While one of the definitions of "indeterminate" is "all possible values are simultaneously valid", there is still something subtly different about these two concepts, because we tend to think of the zero-dimension "point" as being infinitesimally small, and the ten-dimension "Ultimate Ensemble" as being infinitely large. But that's the idea I've been promoting with this project: both are really just different ways of thinking about the same concept - a point of indeterminate size. And the point of this video is to show a way of thinking about how the "zeroth" dimension can be interpreted as being both infinitesimally small, and infinitely large: it just depends upon your frame of reference.

[@MrAckeh]

+10thdim Ahh i see ! These videos are very nice man, thank you for all the effort and uploads ! I appreciate it !

[@Collision_TN]

+Arnold Christian Would more likely say it's equivalent to the LAST dimension.

[@MrAckeh]

yeah true ahahha

[@KonaBroLP]

What about a -1 dimension, or i dimension?

[@BrandonHeilBHB]

Show me the -1st Dimension.

[@BrandonHeilBHB]

Actually if we're defining our universe as one that lacks a whole lot of anti- matter then would the negative dimensions be ones that lack normal matter? Would everything be made of anti-matter? Considering that negative numbers don't interact with each other the same way that positive numbers do (two negatives multiplied = a positive) Does that mean that a negative dimension would have slightly different laws?

[@kitschulz9073]

+BrandonHeilBHB Damn that actually made a lot of sense to me, I think you're exactly right honestly

[@tacobull7334]

Show me some skin

[@kimung203]

A line only a line with more possible state I think

[@tuffue2724]

BrandonHeilBHB wow now your picture will be taped on my math classroom board

[@megasupreme9985]

WHY DO I KEEP ENDING UP AT THESE MIND KILLING DIMENTION VIDEOS AT LIKE MIDNIGHT???

[@thetimelords911]

truth

[@justicemagagane5737]

GET OUT OF MY HEAD!

[@megasupreme9985]

I could be watching something else at midnight ;)

[@tacobull7334]

I want tacos

[@capscaps04]

+Taco bull tacos at the zeroth dimension.

[@thiscannotbeyourname]

You have the most perfect voice for this. I am mesmerized by the combination of audio and visual stimulus. This is simply amazing.

[@DerpyGaming1010]

How the hell did I get here from Sethbling's videos? Oh well. This is fucking amazing, so I have no regrets. I love it when mathematicians go batshit crazy.

[@Tetaes]

I've come from Sethbling too! XD

[@AbandonedVoid]

Techathat Sakulsak The answer is I'm a time traveller that watches both sethbling and studies the idea of multiple dimensions.

[@SpamuelNeedbeef]

He's not a mathematician. He's a pseudoscientist who makes stuff up and gets lots of views for it, nothing more. What he claims in this, and his other videos, is not substantiated by any body of scientific or mathematical knowledge. If you want to actually learn how the world or mathematics works, go watch some videos by Sagan, Feynman, Michio Kaku, Neil Degrasse-Tyson, Krauss, Hawking, MinutePhysics, Vsause, Numberphile, 60 Symbols, Veritasium, Vihart or any number of excellent science communicators out there who don't just pedal deep sounding bullshit.

[@worldofblocks5375]

Seth's awesome

[@skr4526]

Spamuel Needbeef "He's a pseudoscientist who makes stuff up and gets lots of views for it, nothing more. What he claims in this, and his other videos, is not substantiated by any body of scientific or mathematical knowledge. If you want to actually learn how the world or mathematics works" First off GREAT recommendations But from what i can remember and read here lets see Humm well dose that that mean the 4th dimension is pseudoscience ? before anything new can be found we must experience, or think of it even newton had a theory on gravity that was denied until there where established physics which he helped with to help prove his theory basically just because something cant be recorded seen or documented doesn't mean its not there or not possible lastly if you are referring to this video---- >this video is an interesting and critical way of think even if its wrong it could spin off ideas or other theory's to something of more importance and if you know this guy is a pseudoscientist why come here and poke at something no said he was a mathematician and read the title it literately says Imagining the "Zeroth" Dimension so if you are trying to record or validate an imagination then you may need to shop in the future for a new camera however if your referring to the other guy Sethbling ------>some points are still there but I haven't seen his work or what he claims to call him self

[@pranabbiswas7760]

"Zeroth" Dimension is that Dimension where we can get timeless time , formless form , space-less space all things are unique

[@blackxcherry22]

This reminds me of cards... depending on the game, your Ace is either shit and worthless or it's the best card you can hold.

[@imthescatguy]

at 4:00 i felt an existential crisis come in, and i collapsed

[@S4R1N]

It's both terrifying and beautiful. :)

[@reilem]

"...the perfectely balanced whole that exists both before and after the existence of our universe..." 0.0

[@JakiRose]

You know what's really disturbing? There are an infinite amount of zero-dimensional points in a line, an infinite amount of lines in a plane, and an infinite amount of planes in a 3D space. So, our universe is just an infinite amount of zero-dimensional points? This is like the fletcher's paradox. What if we don't move through space at all...

[@paradigmbrodsky]

No, I don't think so. As I understand it, dimension 0 = En Soph. A calm ocean of all probabilities. No determined direction, size, location, form, or reference points. Pure "I am", simply being with no form. Some say that dimension 0 is a point, but I believe this is erroneous. That's like saying the third dimension is a beach ball when in fact a beach ball is only an object or subsection of the third dimension. A point has no dimensions therefore it is a zeroth dimensional concept, but it is not the zeroth dimension. A point is simply a location, and locations exist in all dimensions except in dimension zero where location is undefined.

[@victoneter]

***** There is in the math but not in actual physics. In math infinity is not very uncommon. Divide 10 by 3 for example.

[@jeffreystephens2658]

On a related note, molecules are atoms and empty space. Atoms are subatomic particles and empty space. Subatomic particles are quarks and empty space. Quarks are string and empty space. String is empty space that vibrates. Wut?

[@TheStrikeBlitz]

+Jaki Rose Stop.

[@shinzantetsu]

Jaki Rose blackholes are zero dimensions

[@benthomason3307]

my brain is so broken that I think we should airdrop recordings of this video over Pakistan.

[@NoNickname9090]

+Ben Thomason Bruh!! Your mind is in the right place if you can come up with jokes like that!! This literally killed me. I'm dead. I'm a ghost. I'm typing this as a ghost.

[@tajjassus]

plz don't do it bro i can't go through this again

[@user-mc8uk8hy5m]

LMAO

[@bhaveshprajapati8149]

But they mack logic and scientific thinking so it wouldn't affect them a bit. Allahu akbar😂

[@mrsom900]

i came here for the theoretical 0th dimension and I got the meaning of life the goddamn meaning of life is 0 god fucking dammit

[@bradskurt5334]

the meaning of life is to live long enough to reproduce

[@raymondwilliams379]

Katty Madi Damnit 42, I was BETTING ON YOU

[@blindsoul7915]

Ehm, no. You have likely reversed the other concept - life is deviation from the zero, or an infringement of the perfect state. As with everything else we see or feel - there was not enough negative antimatter to quell our deemed positive prevalence in the becoming at the birth of this universe, as we like to view it. And evolution... Across eons evolution has shaped countless, tormented stitches abomination that may or may not survive for long enough to reproduce then be used as a mold on for other creatures spawning into this wretched world just to suffer wit and die. Based in impurity, we can never have our desires fully satisfied - because they are infinite. When made aware of this gluttony we can use our fortunate intelligence to minimize the pain that oblivious life implies. This is what signifies descent near spiritual illumination. The meaning of (sentient) life remains to try and keep that 0 breached, albeit on planes where it will make a difference that holds true beyond one's ego, even beyond attrition of time - science, art, culture, et cetera; over the classic 'generate capable offspring at any cost'-tactic. Just like the meaning of our end is to accept it: The worse we all treat each other, the more people like me will relinquish our faith in you - supplied with reasons leaning to the latter. Life is divergence. Perfection is death.

[@capscaps04]

+Encephalych Dementium that was really deep.

[@blindsoul7915]

capsy dash Eventually, something has to be. For better and worse.

[@Mmanomann]

The most complicated advert of a book ever made.

[@ninny65]

I remember when my teacher first taught my class when I was really young about the concept of "zero". I remember it completely blew our minds

[@UnderscoreZeroLP]

Holy jesus, if you stare in the middle of the expanding circle animation from 1:10 to 2:00

[@CylinderFilms]

HOLY CRAP!!!!

[@pokabuz444]

i did and what got me was when it stopped and started expanding i swear a 3d ball was created and coming at my face

[@teridutoit2545]

wonderful, I held on longer to beyond 3.33, one can see the strands/strings making up the matrix illusion. Nice,

[@thecatgamer2491]

Are you trying to hypnotize me? XD

[@renansilva3879]

Yes, he is trying to convert you.

[@rayannadunn8579]

Commander no from ur sexual orientation

[@bigjermini]

*this video* When the kush be too strong...

[@timwasgehtsiedasan4683]

✌

[@NoNickname9090]

+Jeremy Blair Bruh!! Right!? I live with this mess!! I be gettin' people mentally high. I think that's the real reason people like me around. =.P

[@maisydinosaur]

What about -1st dimension?

[@10thdim]

+Noah Linning Here's the video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/g4eXaICZotRla6s Or were you asking about the negative first dimension? I don't know what that would be.

[@maisydinosaur]

negative 1, not 1.

[@SuperTf2rocks]

+Noah Linning think. What's that opposite of 1 dimensional space?

[@maisydinosaur]

Well what is the opposite of a line?

[@galewallblanco8184]

+Noah Linning a line?

[@anthemlog]

Nope *Picks 0 keys from keyboard and throws them away*

[@bhaveshprajapati8149]

windows_x_seven or does it?

[@lovasz1084]

I literally can't focus with that visual in the video

[@tubelightblue6474]

Lovasz Same

[@NFincNetherbow]

ho ho ho traveler

[@Mrkinghal0]

You’re IQ clearly states you shouldn’t be watching this.

[@blackshadow6164]

While looking at the expanding black/white rings in the beginning of the vid, anyone else start seeing these faint, red lines one the rings covered half the screen?

[@KarlHerzog]

YES! What the fuck is that

[@MysLooni]

Me too! WTF.

[@Rikk1825]

like a spider.

[@serioustable8659]

stare at it the whole time without blinking and then look away. you will be high for like 10 seconds

[@rodneydangerman9616]

Greenish-red into violet, but yes

[@johnnytarponds9292]

I always LOVE when a book or lecture FORCES your mind to think in a different way. This wonderfully produced video has accomplished this.

[@sakogekchyan7366]

In ancient Indian mathematics zero was seen as the divine number, the point from which everything arises. So while civilizations in the West associated zero with a primal chaotic void, Hindus associated it with the timeless and infinite.

[@10thdim]

Very nicely put! The fact that my approach to visualizing the dimensions ties to other systems of ancient thinking is fascinating to me. As I say in the bio attached to my blog, I'm convinced that there are aspects of "essential truth" to these ideas which human beings keep re-discovering through the ages. www.blogger.com/profile/18215892812705188148

[@MoskYoutube]

penguin lord heeyyyy we're everywhere!

[@sakogekchyan7366]

penguin lord Barev aper.

[@MoskYoutube]

սերժիկ սիկտիր :DD

[@MoskYoutube]

penguin lord irakanum aveli lav a

[@lab8985]

AWW WHY IM I TRYING TO LEARN AT 2 in the morning?! IMMA WATCH NARUTO

[@mcdyslexickiddo650]

Same here...

[@emoducky]

Ditto...

[@kemi9403]

+ZenuSwordSlash lol....which episode r u at now?

[@lab8985]

uuuummmm... i think about naruto shippuden episode 110.

[@blakestallsmithofthematrix3438]

lemon I justread this at 2am XD

[@mikosoft]

Okay, this is bullshit. I'm not even sure which of these two things are more important but here goes: 1. when you sum n and (-n) where n=0 -> x (and x is not infinity) you get zero, yes. But that doesn't mean that that zero contains those numbers. That's just a leap of logic. sum of n + (-n) is just that - a sum, a mathematical operation. It doesn't magically "stuff" numbers into the result. You can also think of it like this: take one person, put him in a room. Then take one person out. Put two in, take two out. Repeat until x, where x is not infinity. How many people are in that room? All of them or none? 2. infinity is not a number. It's a mathematical construct with certain properties that we defined so that it can be used in calculations. But there are some non-intuitive operations when dealing with infinity (I'll use "inf" for infinity now on). E.g.: inf + 1 = inf (not inf+1) inf - 1 = inf (not inf-1) inf - inf = undefined How is that? It's because infinity is just that - it's infinity, it's not a finite number, it's something that never ends. It's like you're shoveling and putting dirt on a pile. The amount of dirt on the pile is infinity because you'll never stop shoveling. Now what happens if someone takes one shovel of dirt out of your pile? Nothing, it's still infinity because you will keep adding more dirt. It's even easier when someone adds one shovel of dirt. Now how to visualise inf minus inf? Let's say you have a friend who's a bad dude and he comes and starts taking dirt out of your infinite pile and he'll never stop so his amount of shoveled dirt is minus infinity. Now how large will the pile actually get? The answer is we don't know. It depends on how fast each of you is shoveling, when each of you started, when you take breaks from shoveling etc. The pile is in fact in constant change so there is no definite size of that pile. So now that we see why zero cannot be "all the numbers" just because n + (-n) is zero, we see that the whole concept is proven wrong. All that follows after the construct of zero as "absolute value" are more leaps of logic. In fact probably the worst one is this: "The content of -1 is equal but inverse to the content of 1." - that doesn't even make any sense or maybe I don't understand the construct because English is not my primary language - if so, please somebody explain the meaning to me. At any rate the foundation is a flawed interpretation of math so it's wrong anyway.

[@JPxKillz]

Firstly, I do not agree calling 0 the "largest number" perhaps the "largest set" is more appropriate. And this idea is an idea proposed by Gevin Giorbran, not a bonified theory obviously, that'd be impossible. But I'm sure you know that. "The content of -1 is equal but inverse to the content of 1." I agree that this could be phrased better, but in English it makes perfect sense. Grammatically and logically it means -1 is equal to the inverse of 1. Kinda' weird. Your mini though experiment is slightly flawed. You are not supposed to add and remove, rather add *then* add the inverse. A better thought representation would be... Take a person, put the person into a room and then add that persons inverse. Which doesn't align with conventional logic but hey, it aligns with the proposed idea. But inherently it still approaches the infinite dilemma you mentioned. Infinity is not a number, you are correct, and neither is 0. Both are concepts used as models for computations. Thus, by recognizing all real numbers lye between 0 and inf 0 and - inf. It is helpful to intrinsically define the two abstracts as related to real numbers in the way 1 + (-1) + 2 + (-2) .... This is reasonable since this is not in terms of sheep or any real objects, but simple abstractions. Just as the axiom for infinite is abstract. I am not a math major but this is my take on it.

[@mikosoft]

Prof. Killionare "Grammatically and logically it means -1 is equal to the inverse of 1." - that's actually my gripe with it. According to the given theory 1 is a "set" of all real numbers except for 1 and -1 is the set of all real numbers. Those two sets are almost the same except for one member. Far from being inverse. And that's another huge problem here - the amount of vague redefining in this video is too high. If someone is o put forth a concept like this somehow needs to be honest about what he is doing. Using addition, subtraction, inverse in nontrivial manner without defining is no math, it's just babbling.

[@RylanEdlin]

This isn't meant to be a rigorous definition in the terminologies of common mathematics, it's meant to be a thought exercise. I agree that explaining it with "sum({0}\{-n})" makes more sense, but at least the video got us thinking about the idea. On a side note, the idea of zero being the perfect whole actually also aligns with other kinds of indeterminate values. I find it astounding that an infinitesimal per infinitesimal can be determinate, when an infinity per infinity is not.

[@MeOKMeO]

mikosoft yup, because math is defined/created, not found

[@gaspar30]

You don't seem to understand the video.

[@EvoArtsLLC]

To help you understand zero vs infinity. Think of them as the same thing, except infinity defines a direction either positive or negative. There zero and infinity means zero is a point in infinity without movement, while infinity is points that of zero in a direction while moving. Therefore it comes back onto itself because it is moving.

[@Cinicraft00]

2:48 A billion dollar warship brought down by a bug that divided by zero??!? The engineers that wrote that code must have been on acid and used Windows Server 2013 as their backend.

[@bigjermini]

+CiniCraft Sure it wasn't Windows ME?

[@NoNickname9090]

+CiniCraft They should have added a Try-Catch to prevent that error. It makes you wonder how many other programs are out there with this... 'flaw'. LoL!!

[@Cinicraft00]

Izaya Evarez They obviously forgot to do any kind of unit testing 😂

[@NoNickname9090]

***** You have made my terrible day better. LoL!!

[@willanthony9126]

Lmao

[@alZiiHardstylez]

Could a negative dimension exist?

[@Zahn-rad]

+alZiiHardstylez Beat me to the question. I assume if it is a possibility it's likely there would be up to 10 negative dimensions that we can comprehend. That is, if such a concept exists.

[@TheSkyrimandyogscast]

+alZiiHardstylez Most likely,balance exists in everything.A negative dimension probably have to do with anti-matter.

[@rich1051414]

+alZiiHardstylez The dimensions are counted, and that physical number is not relavant beyond that, other than that of this 'zeroth' dimension, which is actually the lack of everything(which is everything simultaneously) In this, it is only a label. This is like asking someone what their negative second car was. It makes no sense. However, this does remind me of a joke as a kid, when someone shares a drink with you and you drink all of it, and say your half was on the bottom. This is pretty much like saying, say, time is explicitly the 'fourth dimension'.

[@alZiiHardstylez]

Yeah, but like. Even dimensions are weird to think about. It defies logic. Maybe their's negative everything. Idk.

[@KonaBroLP]

What about this: what would an imaginary dimension be like?

[@LiamSilverman]

this video cause hallucinations

[@Stifwix]

+L . I . A _ M the begining circles almost did that for me,

[@iamessence6268]

It made me dizzy.

[@romliahmadabdulnadzir1607]

In mathematics, a zero-dimensional space is a space that contains no paths or continuous curves. Such spaces are also called discrete spaces and are often used in topology to study the properties of more complex spaces. Zero-dimensional spaces have many interesting properties. For example, any zero-dimensional space can be shown to be completely disconnected, meaning that the closure of any subset of the space contains no non-empty connected subset other than itself. This property makes zero-dimensional spaces very useful in certain areas of mathematics and physics, such as the study of fractals and the construction of certain types of models. Additionally, zero-dimensional spaces can be used to represent certain types of data structures such as trees and graphs.

[@matko9851]

this gave me a headache and im gonna go re-evaluate my whole existance

[@LisaSimpsonRules]

***** Matt and Natalia. If re-evaluatiing your whole existance is too much trouble, you could have an aspirin as well. I'd save you effort and trouble. :-))))))

[@ScribeJB]

This is really quite a mind blowing concept in my opinion. I understand what's been explained, but I definitely will have to re-watch this to grasp a clearer understanding to the point that I could explain it to others myself.

[@akebalucas3998]

ok. seriously watched this video today and it actually blows my mind. never thought about the number 0 that way. it's...beautiful

[@TheDorian120723]

IM NOT ON DRUGS SO DONT TELL ME THIS Does anyone else see the rings in the beginning all wobbly and sometimes like a spiral or is it just me?

[@texmj123]

I hate to break it to you, but someone must have slipped you some drugs.

[@TheDorian120723]

OMG 50 THUMBS UP FOR YOU AUTOMATICALLY..

[@sbk180tr]

Yeap I see them. Pretty sharp colours too.

[@XanGious]

you'll need to move your head further away then you can see it. also if u stare at it long enough you'll see somekind of flower pattern when u close your eyes/look at blank page

[@yvancluet8146]

it's normal, it's an optical illusion

[@MrMcVilla]

So we're not starting with a point this time ._.

[@austinb797]

As of 8:38 where I stopped, this idea defines itself upon semantics and thought experiments (like lawyers...). Don't be confused out of the fact that this is purely philosophical and has no mathematical relevance. And don't go into calculus class with the preconception that zero has some sort of powerful significance. Like those kids from high school who thought there would be something mystical about a hypothetical final digit of pi. This is what I get for watching a video about tesseracts.

[@pleasantvalley9898]

AGREED!

[@brandtcampbell3610]

Austin Bullock You didn't know? The last two digits of pi are 42.

[@Core_Four]

Austin Bullock Youre basically saying that because something is theoretical/philosophical now it has now use in mathematical discourse. That's tantamount to the early neanderthals who dismissed the number 0 in the first place thousands of years ago.

[@victoneter]

Austin Bullock The guy who made this is a massive crackpot by the way. Still it's kind of interesting to hear his loony ideas and it's somewhat educational

[@KCCCX]

victoneter how

[@DeltaMuse]

I really at times have to pause these videos to give myself time to comprehend these discussions! Thanks & these are great!

[@CodieMonowi]

"[Our universe] is defined by what's missing from it." wowowowowow still trying to wrap my mind around this

[@CylinderFilms]

So zero is not empty but full of every possible state. Got it. Now if you'll excuse me, my head is about to explode, so if you would stand back.................

[@mcgibs]

Why do concepts like this have to have some negative connotation? It doesn't make my head explode, or implode, or drive me insane. If anything, knowing that you have the ability to even try and think about something so outside of everyday life should make you feel more solid, more real. It ought to be a good feeling. Like a donkey who wonders about the guy who tied that carrot on the stick he's holding in front of the donkey. That'd be a smug ass donkey, whose head is probably feeling super okay.

[@benyed1636]

mcgibs You didn't get the joke.

[@AdvancedGaming4444]

You have the best vocabulary I’ve ever heard

[@dhoffman4994]

Love your journey Robert sir. You have my 💯 percent attention. Tell us more please.

[@turtlestache1212]

Oh weird part of KZbin, my old friend... How good it is to see you again.

[@joshuaosei5628]

Infinity + -infinity = 0, everything + all but nothing = nothing = 0 = void of all dimensions because there isn't any. This is why 0 is an connected oval it's long vertically because it wanted to find an end but could not; it ended up meeting itself.

[@joshuaosei5628]

Michael Mischko Infinity plus negative infinity must equal 0

[@joshuaosei5628]

Michael Mischko Basically I mean is as said before inf+ negative infinity equals zero Zero can also be defined as a void nothing. we cannot define nothing because there isn't anything. It's like asking a blind man what colour a red apple is by only touching it. He cannot accomplish it.

[@joshuaosei5628]

Michael Mischko OOOOOOOH!! *facepalm of shame* ok then.

[@Tethloach1]

Zero or infinity who scares you more? they are conjoined twins. one leads to the other, infinity money = zero value. absolute power= infinite= zero control, aka pure explosion( big bang).

[@Tethloach1]

some infinities are bigger than others. irrational numbers are just insanely huge.

[@danielbustamantefernandez5960]

And the "Turning a sphere inside out" seemed complicated to me...

[@bronze2181]

As well as these videos being incredible, your voice reminds me a lot of the Baldurs Gate narrator. Thanks!

[@nO_d3N1AL]

Interesting perspective. Makes a clear distinction between finite and infinite numbers

[@invertebrateargus3934]

Zeroth the ultimate whole number

[@AlnelExtreme]

Damn I was going to say that..

[@br3nto]

The craziest thought I took away from this (which the video didn't really expand upon) is the concept of numbers as a set. Just as 0 is a set of all numbers less itself. For example 1 can be the set {1}, or {1, (1-1)}, or {1, (7-7), (222-222), ...}. Each of those sets all represent 1, but at the same time each set is different. Like wise, subtract each of those 1 sets from 0 will result in -1, but each -1 will be slightly different. It's the infinite 0 set less the finite 1 set. Mind blown.

[@shwetakajrolkar1798]

Not everything can be calculated.

[@muhammadscott1488]

@@shwetakajrolkar1798 everything can be because everything is math

[@ahcensoufi9923]

Wah, you two are brilliant conversationalists ! Anyway, the idea of infinite -1 subtracted from infinite 0, creating stuff this way, is quite extraordinarily interesting.

[@TheGalurand]

So, if I add -1 to -2, I can bring them together outside of "0" to have a -3. In this case the -3 inside the "0" dissappears and then appears outside.

[@robcarlos3005]

NOW THIS IS THINKING OUT THE BOX GOOD WORK MAN WE NEED IDEAS LIKE THIS 2 COMPLETE THE BIG PICTURE.

[@ZerosInfinite]

My email is zerosinfinite at every major email service and has been so for years... but very few understand why.

[@lorenion]

it's not that easy... you have to put a zero side to another one to get the infinite

[@ZerosInfinite]

lorenion zero is infinite simply (to me) means nothing is everything or rather everything is nothing. Absolute chaos, any and every thing occuring at any and evey location always and concurrently would be an example of everything that is nothing because each thing that could potentially occur, would also have it's exact opposite co-occurring... just a theory of mine.

[@namthainam]

1 = (1+2+3+4+5...)/(1+2+3+4+5...) OMG 1 is all numbers too!!! yeah you can make any number equal a FORMULA containing all numbers but that does not make that NUMBER contain all numbers. Its the formula that contains all numbers. Do not be confused by this.

[@tmnta0935]

No, you just shifted (conceptually) your zero reference point.

[@KalterspiegelFan]

TMTC5 Yeah and that proves he is right :D 1 = (1+2+3+4+5...)/(1+2+3+4+5...) has nothing to do with 0

[@namthainam]

Phraser see! you get it! =)

[@WilliamSlaght]

Nam Thai you forgot negative numbers, so nope, it isn't all numbers you've got there, but only positive ones. Still interesting nevertheless!

[@KalterspiegelFan]

LinkBulletBill u can include them too. because x/x=1 for every x so so can the sum of all whole numbers

[@mimerafm3794]

5:00 the exact same thing can be done to any other number than zero. so the sum of all numbers is not zero or any other number, it's simply undefined

[@UntitledGameShow]

Got here from a video on Rubik's Cube and glad I got here. Liked the video.

[@And55555able]

brain explodes

[@4dityanarayan]

His voice has depth. He's 1D. xD

[@Evelyn_Noname]

There's no depth in 1d

[@4dityanarayan]

+not real point xD

[@NoNickname9090]

+aditya narayan I am so mad. Bwahahahahaaa!! I am just going to steal that for my own use.

[@10thdim]

Hi Otto, good to meet you, have just spent some time reading your blog, you have a fascinating viewpoint and I agree, there are connections between our two approaches for sure! Please keep in touch.

[@SnakeFeeder]

I like your ideas, and I like the fact that the duration of this video is 10:10. Nice touch :)

[@DaceyMoonFairyThomas]

I feel so empty

[@CheeseinatorGaming]

I'm gonna make a comment before and after the video. Before. Easy, the 0 dimension is an infinitely small point, used to represent the directional values of the rest of the dimensions. After. Makes sense, however we did not go in depth of the dimension itself, merely the concept of zero as a whole. Speaking of the dimensions is a whole other level of math that cannon be explained using the normal parameters of math.

[@xirtus]

I think people are about ready for this... almost. Going to reach out to see if I can get you for a well received interview; if it is time and you have time ;)

[@ajitbakshi]

Just the right content i was looking for , thanks 👍😊

[@naswinger]

I had to double check whether i was watching a video by a religious cult because the reasoning is exactly as farfetched as in religious explanations (zero is the largest number containing everything...).

[@Ussurin]

Actually guy made a one major mistake, by assuming (-1) = (1), by assuming geometrical explanation of numbers is lenght and not the act required to get from one point to another in plane you can move only forward. (That's why there's an arrow on the end of each "dimension line", cause dimensions are infinite, but don't actually go in both directions, the actually go in one direction, you just pick an "origin point" on infinite line and measures how many "steps" it take to get from that "origin point" to the point you're talking about. And you cannot go (1) backwards, going backwards is removing those "steps" you've taken from "real origin point" that is infinitly far behind you)

[@KCCCX]

Ussurin don't think of -1 as backwards but before

[@KCCCX]

He said this is not math as we know it but a math without time. An idea. Consider nothing having the probability to be anything. Hence, something out of nothing. It's possible that everything that has and will exist has already happened.

[@grapefruit1853]

Augure Zera Ok, let's analyse your comment. "Either you understand this video - which can't be disputed by logic - or you're a stupid fuck" I don't see the problem with not understanding something that can't be disputed by logic. I mean, that makes sense "Who of course is and atheist - meaning logic and reason doesn't matter to you" I believe you might want to check up on why most people are atheists I know replying to your comment is useless since 1) your comment is approx. 2 years old and 2) even if it wasn't you probably wouldn't respond, but I feel like I should respond anyway

[@MetaKnight964]

^ Atheism aren't and logic/reason aren't intertwined.

[@erikadrummonded]

Why did all this gibberish just make me feel dumb? I feel like making a video. I'll just take some acid and make up some nonsense and see how amazing people think it is.

[@scotttimothy64]

funny but true....that's exactly what this dude did

[@MishaShivers]

Ahhh what fun ideas, it's so cool to see them being talked about :D :D

[@selinnazsur2328]

*Homestuck flashbacks* Right now I'm feeling what I felt when I first read the comic. This channel gives me those feels

[@LinoOliveira92]

"The biggest questions in science and religion" Bro religion doesn't questions, it pretends to know all the answers. Religion even punishes people for asking questions lol.

[@IshiFishiPlayzGamez]

+Lino Silva You shouldn't group all religions into one category.

[@LinoOliveira92]

IshiFishin' Stuff Ok, tell which specific religion doesn't do this please.

[@tronical7276]

+Lino Silva buddhism

[@LinoOliveira92]

Tronical I don't know a lot about buddhism, but all i know about it makes it better than all western religions. It still brings nothing good to the table though, and it's not safe from ritual insanity. Did you know people cook their best food and put it on the floor of buddhist temples for buddha to eat? Except, it's a load of rats that pop up and eat the food. Now, what kind of damage does buddhism do to progress? I don't know, but i would guess it's less that western religions. If you wanna pull a religion from Asia though, remember to think of how religion affects those countries, You'l see that hardcore religious fanatics aren't nearly as common there and religion in general is less powerful.

[@IshiFishiPlayzGamez]

Not all..

[@scott12459]

can the zeroth dimension hold all dimensions with out time and the 10th dimension holds all the dimensions with time . would the 11th dimension allow you to go from 0 to 10 and all dimensions held within them ?.

[@Junji101]

This thoery kind of melts when you consider what happens when you take away more than one number. Like say you take 2 and 3. What will you be left with?

[@RafaelRabinovich]

Is there a -1th dimension? Are negative dimensions necessary for the creation ex nihilo of our Universe and dimension?

[@plyrkiller12]

omg this totally explains what has been done in banking ,credit they have allowed us to define value and the more we use money shows how little we value everything else . my mind is a pretty scary place sometimes but i just had a lightbulb come on and, this place aint so bad . totally diggin your talks here they have helped me to stretchout my mind im only about 5 days old in terms of trying to understand dimensions but im locked in now and totally excited , thank you

[@mohinigupta6742]

Is their any conction between the dark mater and the dimensions beyond 3rd one

[@elmmont8562]

After watching this the first time I was put into a trance and wound up at an airport not knowing why I was there, started freaking out and got put in a psych ward.

[@MrTreeHumps]

For real tho?

[@Brobu]

Question. if you want to draw 3D on a paper, which is actually 2D, can you draw 1D with 0D?

[@daylonmartin1807]

Is it just me, or is this guy trying to hypnotize us?

[@laurakauhanen2530]

My mind just exploded. You man, you just totally changed my way of thinking about math!

[@KuroSaber]

Quick question: Is there any possibility of something existing out of these dimensions because they simply lack that dimension?

[@SocksyyAU]

10thdim could the tenth or eleventh dimension possibly be the warping of the 9th or 10th dimension to the zeroth dimension?? joining the two together into a mobius strip that can be possibly be somewhat of a 2D surface from the prospective of the 11th dimension? or this impossible?

[@colts9999991]

I like how this video is 10:10 long. Its the totality of the tenth dimension or the zeroth dimension. "The tenth dimension in its unobserved state."

[@kathyberken5755]

i wish i had you for a teacher when i was majoring in math way back in the '60s.

[@monkeywrench677]

and i thought since i could build bridges and rockets i was a scientist, you just proved me wrong, YOU are the real scientist here, and a bloody good one at that!

[@seanwilkinson3975]

"Nothin' ain't worth nothin', but it's free."

[@ModestNeophyte]

I'd appreciate some clarification on whether or not the assumption I draw from this video seems to be true to others, or I've misunderstood something. If I were to sum up this video in as few words as possible, I would say "The 0th dimension is the whole of unrealized potential."

[@rodneyswindle4938]

I think your right. Here's my explanation: The 0th dimension is where everything entirely breaks down, and anything is completely possible, yet impossible at the same time... The laws of physics can rapidly change or stay the same at any moment. It can suddenly pop into any dimension it desires, or begin the process of changing and suddenly stop. It contains everything or nothing at any given moment in time. It contains time, and doesn't simultaneously. The video said, "This 0 were headed to is not empty, but full of all the other possible states". Its a very difficult thing to imagine... But, this is assuming the zeroth dimension even exists. I believe it doesn't, and to have 0 dimensions is to truly have nothing.

[@evanweaver7373]

If you lived in zero dimensions, you could still "Move". I put quotes as you wouldn't move, but instead, there would be different values to each particle that substitute space and time. The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd dimension could be substituted for stuff like heat, magnetism, ect. Sight could be you detect how different one particles value is from yours.

[@frjimomi]

Because you're a genius, ZenuSwordSlash, and such attempts to grasp reality, like quantum physics, beyond the normative reality we experience, is irresistible to you. Don't stop. Go for it.

[@Fex.]

I full screened that growing black/white -circle, kept starting it and see eventually started seeing "colorish auras", mostly heading NW, SW, SE and NE. Sorta similar to ...oily rainbow, which kept moving. Cool!

[@zbzb-ic1sr]

your videos are brilliant I have to say

[@christopherzhang1516]

wait... if you have mass, and you spread it infinite space, do you ave zero density?

[@LinOchoa11690]

@10thdim it seems like your saying there are multiple dimensions, which go from 0 to 9 (single digits, which are widely used for tallying objects). Is there a way that these 10 dimensions can be treated as one?

[@CreamSupreme444]

That beginning contradicts itself so hard.

[@legu333]

Dear Rob Bryanton, what happens if you remove more than one number from zero? Lets say i remove 3 and 5? Will it be then -8? Or is "eight" different from "five" and "three" so that it results in something else? How about if i remove 1 and -1? What will zero then become? Please help, im confused!

[@StainedGnome]

this makes me wonder about the relationship between the mind and the universe. Our minds are perceived as going infinitely inward where as the universe is perceived as going infinitely outward. Would this concept carry over to the idea of the universe being intimately intertwined with our psyche?

[@gangamonk]

I got a question: why transforms 0 only into 2 when i Take Out -2?? Couldnt it be also 2 when i tAke Out 4 so its -4 and then Take Out -6 so it Finaly equals 2 again? Wouldnt this mean there are Einfluss combinations to anything in Algebra and so in this World??

[@Vinvininhk]

I can understand why 2 or 1 is less than 0 but why is 2 less than 1 and how doesn't 2 and -1 compare in this system? which one is larger?

[@il2xbox]

uhhh guys.. why hasn't this video reached infinity likes yet?

[@savagecabbage6903]

BTW if anyone figures out how many faces r on a terresect(4D cube)it could help me figure out the exact sizing of all dimension cubes whatever their called.

[@jessicajones8062]

Everything has a fondation whether going up or down foward across past present future and every which which way there are ifinite possibilities with zero representing the whole...just ranting away. Thought this video was awesome.

[@TheRock-qn1zr]

What if we have 1 + 1 = 2? Adding 2 very large numbers becomes a number slightly smaller than either part?