India Needs Modern Naval Nuclear Reactors That AUKUS Is Providing Australia, Will France Step In?

US, UK and Australia formed the AUKUS to deter China in the Indian Ocean. But the AUKUS is big strategic blow to India as Australia get 8 nuclear submarines which India has been demanding for long. Why does India need a nuclear submarine and who can provide India with one. All this and much more in this episode.
#AUKUS #Quad #India
Crux is your daily dose of the big, viral and relevant news in a few minutes. It’s your ultimate guide to staying informed on the latest in politics, international relations, sports, entertainment and social media
Follow CRUX on Instagram (@crux.india): bit.ly/3qSFx1K
Follow CRUX on Facebook: bit.ly/2Lte7iF
#GetCloserToTheNews with latest headlines on politics, sports and entertainment on news18.com bit.ly/2Y4QccL
Also watch:
Crux One Take: bit.ly/3oNaLWf
Crux Files: bit.ly/3mnbnjW
Crux BTS: bit.ly/3oCjbQE

[@christineswan5999]

First time I've watched you guys, normally watch Wion. I've only heard "Hopping mad" and "cheesing someone off" here in Australia. Still smiling to hear you say it! Have been following the Indian/Chinese border dispute and I wish you all the best India.

[@WycliffStudios]

Wion is a useless propaganda channel

[@Dbenzsanz]

It's nice to know that you care about India

[@fbi8047]

Wion is propaganda channel. Don't watch it.

[@guptabhishek]

@@fbi8047 How?

[@guptabhishek]

@@WycliffStudios How?

[@dominique4700]

india is in extraordinary development, there are great engineers and very competent people in your country. France has advanced technology, we should have even more cooperation between the two countries, that would be great

[@j4eg3r47]

Now the question is will other countries allow india to build nuclear reactors for subs smoothly. History has shown that nuclear scientists are always targeted and killed in India and no evidence ever shows up.

[@gokulsuji233]

Not other countries its always been us doing that

[@j4eg3r47]

@@gokulsuji233 United States?

[@wesscat]

If you actually believe the US assasinates your nuclear scientists, you would also have to admit that the Indian government's intelligence agencies are so bad they cannot investigate who did it, or even collect the tiniest of evidence so it will be recorded in history for the modern age to learn about. Alas, Pakistan is more likely to assasinate your nuclear scientists than the US.

[@j4eg3r47]

@@wesscat pakistan can't do shit but yes intelligence agencies of countries did kill and we couldn't find any evidence on it.

[@gokulsuji233]

@@wesscat our intelligence is not as good as cia and our judicial system is rigged and full of loopholes nobody denies that

[@Krishnendu792]

Drawing parallel between AUKUS and India France JV is an absurd thing to do. Australia doesn't even have any SSBN or SSN. India on the other hand has INS ARIHANT and INS ARIGHAT, the two nuclear powered SSBNS which are the main workhorses of India's nuclear deterrence, for now. In 2022, 7000 ton S4 is gonna get launched. BARC has made nuclear reactor for these SSBN programmes already. But we are at 2nd gen level when it comes to those reactors. France stands at 9th generation standard and they use Low enriched Uranium for their reactors. India is looking for similar kind of tech as we have an ocean of thorium ore here. Plus this reactor will be standardized for all the future SSNs and SSBNs that IN will operate. And looking at French desperation after Aussies ditched them India fits right into the place for France to move ahead with.

[@Liboch]

After hundreds of years under the colonisation of the Brits, Indian psyche has more or less been imbedded of seeing european as a higher caste, as a strong race, as an intelligent race, etc, forgeting that they can excel much better than the european, just like it had been before the colonisation.

[@Krishnendu792]

@@Liboch take your BS to somewhere else my friend. We are already in talks with Brits to develop fighter jet engines. On the other hand, apart from Russia, no one is gonna help you with their super secretive submarine based Nuclear reactor technology except France(upto a certain level). A country which has one of the most advanced 9th gen nuclear reactor technology, similar to what US has. There's no shame to accept the fact that we are way behind French technology. We gotta move faster and we also have to build some of the best state of the art assets to equip our armed forces with. European help will accelerate that progress by many folds.

[@dranzergigs8333]

is it a nuclear armed submarine or nuclear powered.

[@sunnymitra6372]

I would Choose France over America anyday........Britain is a Slave of US now. America is not a reliable country. What they did to their own Citizens and Service Members in Afghanistan is a Wake up call for Indians who thinks USA will help us against China.

[@DigvijaySingh-ct7lu]

Nothing Absurd , we are in our baby stage in manufacturing of SSN and SSBN Reactors , Boilers and propellers are the main source of noise in Nuclear submarine and only Western Sub has achieved a good level of silence while even Russian subs are considered noisy in comparison to them So yeah we need a good and compact reactor tech

[@rustygrigg]

If India benefits from the Aussies cancelled contract that’s great, France will be real keen to make sure they do a much better job than they did for Australia.

[@mayank7158]

Moreover France can be trusted more than USA or even UK

[@1337flite]

They will also probably be keen to keep those companies in work, so you may well get a better deal as well .

[@staceydunne4317]

Well that shouldn't be too hard as they produced absolutely nothing for the Australians yet took 3 billion dollars in payment thus far.

[@kumarandisamy7468]

Cheque book is ready waiting for Paris call

[@mayank7158]

@Robert Vial Narcissists. Still have colonial hangover

[@ayushapoorva]

Unlikely, our best chances for nuke subs are from either Russians or french.

[@wesscat]

Good luck newbies 😅 India will soon find out why Australia bailed out of the deal. France is going to raise the costs and delay the subs. This time, France will be smarter and demand severe reparations if India changes it mind. France will definitely strike rich with India, indeed. 😂

[@peacepeace2323]

Why France or Russia. If Israel the best friend of India is there no need to worry about it.

[@ayushmalviya8698]

@@peacepeace2323 they dont have it I think

[@sghosh8510]

@@peacepeace2323 they are primarily the arms, ammunitions and equipments dealer of india not submarines and armoured vehicles or ships as such

[@akhileshyadav-wn7og]

@@peacepeace2323 israel dont have nuclear sub dumbo

[@subratagupta5693]

as far as i know australia is not getting any neuclear reactor technologies they are just buying those neuclear reactors

[@wesscat]

Australia is both buying nuclear subs AND working with AUKUS to develop their own nuclear subs. One takes weeks, one takes decades. Best to do both.

[@subratagupta5693]

@Robert Vial i am not indian actually.but what ever best of luck.we have no bad feelings about u guys.

[@kashish8541]

talk about the double standards. perfect example for allies nation of US

[@WinterIshere-tf5id]

India has never been an allie of the US.infact india is an allie of no one. Indian is an opportunist country.

[@astounder8595]

He is right india is not Allies with anyone infact they are only strategic partners

[@astounder8595]

@@Thetequilashooter1 well said I think if we wanna get subs quicker it would be better to opt for the Russian subs I think that would be the best idea because out 6 nuclear subs would take more time to build and also because they are more experienced in making subs

[@charlylucky7508]

@@WinterIshere-tf5id , opportunist, you are so right.

[@sigma-sigma1]

Why such a "rukus" is being made about "aukus" it is a matter Between four Countries, Australia,France, usa and Uk. India has no locus standi in this matters, just because Australia cancelled a deal of "conventional french submarine to Australia, now it is being touted because of that Now France will readily supply nuclear submarine technology to India.

[@PIYUSHGUPTA-jg1yw]

I like this form of videos more than subtitled ones. Great improvement!!❤️❤️

[@samyakhp4353]

Tf is this scheduled time? 12 hours!

[@prachetmakwana6011]

I bet the video won't even be too long LMAO.....under 10 mins probably

[@aravindrajamani5699]

Tf means

[@prannoysaha6157]

@@aravindrajamani5699 "the fuck"

[@vscreation550]

This is the golden opportunity for India to acquire technologically sophisticated nuclear powered attack submarines. If France is ready to sell them to India then we should buy this subs without wasting the time.

[@Traveller77709]

India is among other 6 countries, those having nuclear power operating submarin.. #CRUX before posting study well ok

[@sajalchandrakar9330]

They are talking about ssn

[@Madhumatle456]

Yeah but we only have one nuclear submarine

[@gyanchandvij]

They said the technology to build one,not operate.By that means even Australia will be having them,but not the technology.

[@napoleonbonaparte937]

Before wasteing millions and billions of dollars of Indian tax payers hard earned money into buying or procuring this Super expensive Nuclear submarines, Government of India should build more hospitals, more schools, more Universities, more roads, more railways, more bridges, more toilets and more job opportunities for its 1.4 billion ultra poor people whose per capita GDP income is even lower than that of Bangladesh because already Poor country like India wasted 3 to 5 billion dollars in Afghanistan which all now go waste after Pakistani Military backed Talibaan take-over in Afghanistan. Second deadly wave of Corona totally exposed the defunct and hollow nature of India's health care system to the entire world.

[@vikashpal4875]

@@napoleonbonaparte937 covid also showed how capable USA is.

[@Sansan-n6q]

Imagine there will be no wars and we all could use this technology. We would be going on tours in nuclear sub or ship. Never ending clean energy.

[@wesscat]

If it's too good to be true, then it probably is. A lot of countries aren't very transparent with how they do things and they differ a lot in morals. If they are allowed to enrich uranium, they can choose to create a nuclear weapon in secret. And possibly the secrets will be revealed to the world so every country (and terrorists) will be able to learn this procedure. This is how jihadists learned how to build missiles. It's better for the entirety of humanity for a small group of countries to have it because it is easier to keep track of.

[@wesscat]

@deephole66 shallowIf the US and UK falls, another country will rise to take their place, and you will soon wish that the US and UK were still here.

[@charlylucky7508]

@deephole66 shallow , soon you would be under communist control. Or maybe not. But if U.S., U.K. fall, chances are against you. Quit talking shit.

[@nileshdas6995]

If we try enough with our resources we might actually make one of our own rather then buying from other I'm sure as we did with our other projects(nukes, super computer, etc) we can produce this advance sub on our own

[@arvindsuthar1763]

Building a submarine from scratch is a massive job. It would take more than 20 years easily. We need the submarines now.

[@rakshakbharat5846]

We need reactor technology for SSN submarine

[@jsg2196]

Let's hope opposition parties especially congress don't start their propaganda this time as well same as they did during Rafale deal...😒😒😒

[@ddharanesh7230]

Konow the history bro arihant was started under Indira Gandhi .

[@ashwinreddy4669]

India need to convince france for help in building nuclear ssn submarines we dont need many conventional submarines. Instead of spending money on that we need more nuclear powered submarines. We need to strike a deal of atleast 15 to 20 billion dollars to convince france for lending a hand to us. It will be a 1 time investment for quite a sometime in submarines upgradation

[@RaptorsParadise]

Well SSN cannot be used everywhere. If we need some time to build and no nation is willing to provide the technology we have to start it ourselves. India has experience now. India meanwhile can depend on conventional subs with AIP technology

[@4vndd]

Really well researched and presented... hat's of to the anchor.. !!! ( Ms S D.)....( She does an excellent job and makes the viewing both informative and interesting...!!) Good luck and thanks for sharing...!!

[@1337flite]

The difference between AU and IN and the US is that AU has had a long standing incredibly close relationship with the US and the UK as well as the other members of the 5 eyes, auscannzukus, ACP, ABCANZ, ANZUS, SEATO etc. Australia has fought alongside the US in many major conflicts (WWII, Korea, VIet Name, Gulf I, Gulf II, Afghanistan/"GWoT"). Of course Australian forces did not make a huge difference in many cases, but the presence of our forces showed resolute political support. Australia has been politically aligned with the US (for better or worse) for decades and we have had alliances with the US as long. India on the other hand has been unaligned for many decades. The situation is totally different. Now India suddenly says we want to be treated like your longstanding allies even though we have been indifferent or mildly oppositional for maybe 40-50 of the last 60-70 years. Additionally AUUKUS is as much about what the US gets as what Australia gets. The US will have a parnter nation which touches both the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean that will be able to service and support US subamarines, surface vessels as well as air platforms. The RAAF operates many of the same ait platforms as the USAF and USN as well as the RAF and RN. And of course the US has had longstanding use of Australia for communicating with their own SSBN fleet as well as their listening posts at Pine Gap. What has India given or offered the US as a strategic ally over the past 60-70 years? The closeness and length of the US/Indo relationship does not really compare with the US/AU relationship. It's just not a valid comparison. India wants someting now and is crying like a spoiled child because they are not instantly given what they want. Real friendship takes time to develop and is a two way relationship. What has India offered that the US should give them the "crown jewels" after decades of indifference or at best an on again/off again relationship?

[@georgepantazis141]

Also India is aligned with Russia for jets,aircraftcarriers etc get your nuke subs from them.🇭🇲don't trust the French subs.

[@lunarnite3495]

We are building our own reactors...we don't need French assistance on it...if only the author's could research a bit more🤦🏼‍♂️

[@lunarnite3495]

@Kitty Cat those are land-based civillian reactors. Please do some research before commenting 🙂

[@walangchahangyelingden8252]

@Kitty Cat Bro, you can't beat France in nuclear tech.

[@rajendrajasathy4356]

Congress for long did not invest in defense technology.....we are now paying for it.

[@prashant955]

France and russia can help us.. Well they will surely need money..

[@napoleonbonaparte937]

Before wasteing millions and billions of dollars of Indian tax payers hard earned money into buying or procuring this Super expensive Nuclear submarines, Government of India should build more hospitals, more schools, more Universities, more roads, more railways, more bridges, more toilets and more job opportunities for its 1.4 billion ultra poor people whose per capita GDP income is even lower than that of Bangladesh because already Poor country like India wasted 3 to 5 billion dollars in Afghanistan which all now go waste after Pakistani Military backed Talibaan take-over in Afghanistan. Second deadly wave of Corona totally exposed the defunct and hollow nature of India's health care system to the entire world.

[@prashant955]

@@napoleonbonaparte937 i can understand what u said but that doesn't mean we should not invest in SPACE agency like ISRO Or invest in military capabilities. Our health system is poor. We invest only 1.1 percent of gdp into it. We have to invest more on health but we need to secure our country too. What will hospitals do when china attacks us??? Treat dead ones? And investing in afghanistan was a foreign policy decision. It will pay off one day

[@somaghosh2960]

Nice explain mam. 👍

[@mingming9604]

why not? I think a france indian reactor cooperation is not out of question

[@fadlya.rahman4113]

Apparently, it's not just France that feel jilted. India feel jilted as well.

[@dennischai4831]

If France give nuclear sub tech to India then all these AUKUS and France debacle is a "show" to enable more US allies with nuclear subs without alarming China in the process.

[@Dbenzsanz]

India needs to speed up its defense and also create its own deterrence. We need to concentrate on what we are good with. The missile technology could and should be expand to deter these subs. We need alot of improvement in radar and making our own engines.

[@chintaramulu3566]

Your explanation simply 👍👍

[@manivannanchokkalingam8251]

🇫🇷🇮🇱🇷🇺 are the only countries 🇮🇳 can depend on for critical defence items. the 🇺🇸 has supplied guns, helis and maybe drones. Rome was not built in a day.

[@gregorywilson2124]

We don't trust India like that, uk, USA and Australia : getting the band back together : Yeah, Baby! Yeah!

[@DarylIrwinAyo]

India is a good partner, but if you are conservative, you keep your best weapons system to yourself so that no one can just hand it over to what you designed it against, and it also keep your opponents investing money to counter the advantage that you have that makes your investment more worth it

[@kasurottv5603]

Power and cool

[@jameswilkinson9957]

With the French, gee think wisely India.

[@surendramenon4669]

Brilliant ❤️🙏

[@oliversparks1459]

India Should be PROUD of What they Have Got Already But Agree India Needs More Worldwide Support

[@mantrik007]

India has nuclear technology. It should build its own SSNs. Its very important to have indigenous technology because in times of war you don't want to depend on a third party for supplies. We need to increase our budget on defence.

[@yurigansmith]

If the actual strategy was to trigger a nuclear arms race in Asia, it has perfectly worked out. In a couple of years Asia will be ready to ultimately finish itself, and the superior West can complacently declare final victory for eternal hegemony over a radioactive wasteland. At least the global warming issue won't be of any relevance anymore.

[@jjan5392]

If India/Pakistan stop fighting and put more efforts to eliminate poverty this region will be more prosperous.. and what they have achieved in last 70 year just begging western nation to give them advance weapon

[@ric12345]

Uncle Sam will never allow india and pakistan to be peaceful 😭

[@CT-vm4gf]

A submarine lottery? That’s an expensive lottery.

[@mayank7158]

Predator drones jo India khareedne wala hai uspe bhi banao Defence dispatch

[@RohitPal.island]

These ageing Indian naval fleets are result of previous governments thirst for cashloads in their own pockets for a better future 🔮 of them and their kins, Recently the change have started by procuring new technology & funding defence installments, Slow but yeah looking good.✌

[@amritanshbaghel6386]

Love the audio

[@kumarandisamy7468]

France could make a fortune if they do so . Opportunity are flourishing in the field of 1. Nuke aircraft carriers tech 2. Engine development for tejas 3. Cyber warfare 4. Nuke sub tech.

[@TheLargeoldshoe]

Highly unlikely they will give tech but I think they will sell them

[@mssv19123]

What happen when they say Iraq has weapon of mass destruction? Now Australia have it too?

[@manikanthan4693]

India should opt for a passive role in QUAD. Discriminatory treatment meted out is not acceptable and hence, we should be restraint in joining with US.

[@bcgnews8933]

India is just using quad for economic Benefits . India is a part of non aligned movement our focus must be more on economy with increasing our technology levels . Quad is good until it is non military alliance because USA have habit of starting a war and currently going in war would be disastrous for china and india .

[@1337flite]

India should put in 60 or more years as an unflicnhing ally and partner before talkiing about discriminatory treatment.

[@vijaymalhotra6612]

Invite another Rafael like situation?

[@WinterIshere-tf5id]

Would you give something very valuable and very important to someone whom you are not sure whether he is your friend or your foe.

[@charlylucky7508]

France got pryors for doing exactly that. Remember the nuclear facility being built in Iran, then Israel bombed back in the 80's, I believe. Well that was the French building it.

[@anilsinha4968]

No nation is going to part with such sensitive technology. Investment in R&D in cutting edge technology is the. Only way out. It is expensive but there are no options left .

[@SK-ck9qu]

Why? India should trust her own engineers and scientists.

[@5yfgh7hcbbg]

India France and Japan are friends forever....

[@Traveller77709]

AUKUS is all about France and australia deal cancellation , and made new deal with US and Aus under observation of UK... dont know you guys understading Aukus purpose or no..??

[@WycliffStudios]

These guys all got internet using Jio. Now they're coming and commenting on international matters without knowing anything

[@1337flite]

No. In addition to mutual defence AUUKUS is all about reducing the transit time for US/UK forces and thereby letting them be more effecvtive with less platforms - less time in transit means more time on station. Australia is well placed with bases on both the Indian and Pacific Oceans as well as good access to SEA and reasonbly close to the South China sea. Location, location, location. Manufacturing subs in Australia also re-inforces that as it means US/UK SSNs will be able to be serviced and possibly undergo refit in Australia. And the AU subs means the US and UK won't need t0 buy as many. Australia will pick up some of the cost.

[@ashishonwheels7438]

Me: lets go buy some fishes Dad: Fishes are a thing of the past, its Subs now.

[@Sam-os1lt]

Fish

[@ashishonwheels7438]

@@Sam-os1lt Fishes, usually refers to multiple species of fish, especially in scientific contexts.

[@Sam-os1lt]

@@ashishonwheels7438 Thanks. I stand corrected.

[@chinahamyku6583]

The transfer of nuclear submarine technology by the United States and Britain to Australia is tantamount to unilaterally undermining the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and causing a nuclear imbalance in the Asia-Pacific region. That being the case, China can provide Pakistan with nuclear submarine technology and even sell nuclear submarines. In addition, China can also help North Korea do the same.

[@1337flite]

Whereas China, North Koera, Pakistan and India having actual nuclear weapons doesn't undermine non-proliferation? Oh that's because those countries don't even agree with the idea of non proliferation. Australia will not be building or buy nuclear warheads - unlike China, North Koera, Pakistan and India.

[@chinahamyku6583]

@@1337flite Australia will not make or buy nuclear warheads? This is a self-deceiving joke. Just like I bought a gun, but I would never buy a bullet, who can I fool? Chinese officials have clearly stated that this is suspected of violating the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and seriously undermining regional security. Chinese military scholars have already talked about countermeasures in Chinese state media, suggesting that China readjust its nuclear policy, including abandoning the principle of “no first use of nuclear weapons”.

[@burlatsdemontaigne6147]

Non proliferation treaty refers to weapons only NOT propulsion systems. Submarine power plants are NOT weapons.

[@indiandefensearena905]

Yes ofcourse if India can spend 15 billion usd on submarine alone

[@mre7550]

You are confused..........France was offering diesel subs, not nuclear

[@trthib]

You are the confused one. Australia refused the nuclear subs and insisted on having them redesigned with diesel/electric engines and finally changed their minds

[@joem0088]

The US cannot object to France selling SSN to India now. Does India has 50 to 100B Euro with all these poor people to feed and educate ? If yes, France will certainly take it.

[@RYZEN-D]

India now has more than enough money to buy you people off the shelves, unlike your countries India's debt is much less as compared to your's country , go and check for facts before speaking

[@joem0088]

@@RYZEN-D Don't talk about others. France is waiting for your lovely cash. Just call up Macron. He needs good news for his election coming soon.

[@SAMX4949]

FAKE NEWS! India was aware and kept in loop by the Aussies about AUKUS

[@keyohana8441]

Ir is good for India to get French nuke submarine. They can block Chona from going to Pacific!

[@singarajancarter1042]

Let's Discuss Diplomacy is power to Bringing Good technology to India Do it Right way Get it Right Away 💯🙏

[@Rohit_.Verma_.]

French technology is same as India ,their submarines also need to refueling in every 10 years ,but american have sophisticated technology that they need to fuel only once to their subs for whole of its life time

[@keng293]

What about radars etc? A submarine is not just an engine

[@phanupongasvakiat337]

Buy Swedish fighters, and buy French ones only if India gets nuclear submarines with the deal, within a short time not in 8 years that never arrives as France did to Australia.

[@davidtapp3950]

Don't give them to India. Sell them to India.

[@mikespear5459]

But France can't do anything against UK, US wishes. China is smiling and mocking at India.

[@piyushshaw5063]

It isn't like India can't build SSN, which stands for Submersible Ship Nuclear, but it is exigency which is forcing India to look for these. India already operates SSBNs, which stand for Submersible Ship ballistic missile nuclear, and India is trying to build a fleet of 6 SSBN. And the reason behind India's supplication for SSN from the France and the US is China's aggressive behaviour or posture in Indo-Pacific. So what India is asking for is legitimate and is within its rights to do so, although the USA and France wouldn't be rude if they denied transfer of technology, it would only be ill-advised and myopic vis-a-vis China.

[@franciscoverra2307]

United States will not give such nuclear power submarines and technology since its closeness 2 Russia, hope d Indian will pretty understand that, but Australia is a great help 2 India also..

[@chandrasegaran460]

Made in India nuclear submarine

[@kokkeongfoo5472]

The door is opened .. France can sell the nuclear subs ..

[@subinsahadevan9343]

us govt agenda towards Indian chance based on leadership instead of it India should renew there friendship with Russia and japan coz us can change even in second of time it have shown in the past and now also

[@wellanyway8254]

Then Pakistan will get them from Russia or China. This is getting silly....

[@muhammedzayedibrahimkhan6639]

India should buy 12 nuclear power submarines from France immediately

[@aravindrajamani5699]

How it's possible?, we are developing nuclear capable submarine indigenously. Kindly search about project 75A. We will manufacting only 6 submarines. We didn't have a funds to buy 12 nuclear power submarines.

[@anonymous-qt7wq]

Instead they should be made in india with help of France that would be better right?

[@sairag3958]

@@anonymous-qt7wq we are just asking for technology transfer from France we are not using them to make submarines for us

[@napoleonbonaparte937]

Before wasteing millions and billions of dollars of Indian tax payers hard earned money into buying or procuring this Super expensive Nuclear submarines, Government of India should build more hospitals, more schools, more Universities, more roads, more railways, more bridges, more toilets and more job opportunities for its 1.4 billion ultra poor people whose per capita GDP income is even lower than that of Bangladesh because already Poor country like India wasted 3 to 5 billion dollars in Afghanistan which all now go waste after Pakistani Military backed Talibaan take-over in Afghanistan. Second deadly wave of Corona totally exposed the defunct and hollow nature of India's health care system to the entire world.

[@Random-uf9xi]

@@napoleonbonaparte937 Americas situation was worser than during second stage of covid.

[@abhishek0kb]

It is sad that India couldn't come up something on its own🤦‍♂️

[@devarapallisivaprasad707]

Jai hind

[@DharmendraSharma-yo1id]

India has only 15 submarine... It's really joke Congress ne kuchh kara hi nhi

[@peterweaver1248]

Best to get inferior nuclear subs from Russia then France(you will never receive them) and China, they are much cheaper and there is a reason why. I thought India had a program to build it's own Nuclear subs. If you don't get a wiggle on Pakistan will have you well and truly out-gunned.

[@premnarayan6650]

The French - Australia submarine deal was for conventional Submarines, it got tangengeled up and did not progress ,France did not help to ease the situation for five years . Why cry ? This has no connection to India .

[@alyasagan3620]

Why Aukus...India jilted...tgats why

[@Sumit-fv6mp]

India operates SSN = INS Chakra correct ur facts.

[@alyasagan3620]

Insia too jilted be US and Britain

[@0987654321mnbvcxzmor]

people do get jealous,that might work in your favor,plus we have some old subs we don't need anymore and France may have a fire sale for new subs that no body wants anymore.

[@vishnugs7059]

India begs for nuclear subs from US 🤣

[@balekardar21]

If really China has SSN Technology? they need to give answers for some unanswered questions. 1) Their submarines are easily detected by Japan, UK recently. 2) Their submarine disasters are not revealed to public, but everyone know disasters happened to USA, Russia, UK, France. 3) China has a huge no. of naval assets, but are they reliable in a war? 4) Do they have experience in maintaining those assets? 5) History tells us USA defeated in Vietnam War? 6) Russia, USA countries have also lost some wars. You know they started proxy wars. 7) So, if we look and think realistically China has no quality material in weapons, then no one will fear of their weapons.? 8) Some paid news magazines say, china has lot of weapons, china has bombers, do you really think they will work in war like situation? I sincerely believe no. 9) In ancient times, many kingdoms collapsed because they do not have the quality leadership, even though they have large no. of armies. So, better stop believing that China is superior economic, technologically country. Because if it can't avoid Evergreen company 300 billion dollar debt, how it will become world's second largest economy. who knows how many financial scams are happening in that country. Remember Covid-19 it has origins in China, and they claimed only 3000+ casualties. They have more casualties but they never reveal the figure. So, wise people understand that what china is capable of? If you have any doubts, study their history, they shamelessly betrayed their people to protect corrupted ones.

[@GK-ui8fv]

India will be a fool to get sucked in because Australia pulls out. But I wouldn't bet on keeping India out from a wretched deal with France as India already allowed to let Rafael deal become three times expensive. So, it will be geat opportunity for BJP to let slip from its hands to seek any kind of sub deal with France.

[@shopaccount3715]

There's a difference between nuclear submarine and nuclear powered submarine!! First teach idiots internet folks about that!! 🤣

[@rakshit8570]

U want SSN and same standard of technology as of US or france. Give all the projects of submarines to private sector. Simple as that untill this is with govt control nothing will happen. After a decade when govt cant build first SSN, L&T made the first SSN with in less time as well as low cost. Still no further projects were given to them we are so full of shit the person who do the work dont give them work but the one who protest every day give them all our projects let them get delayed by decades.

[@sanurawat1651]

Conventional subs are quieter than Nuclear Subs that's a good thing if we just have to defend & not deploy more often.... I'm not saying we shouldn't have any Nuclear subs but a small fleet is enough i think....

[@graemesydney38]

This is just a plain silly attempt at an analysis. Nuclear reactors are the absolute cutting edge of military tech. While India remains reliant on Russia as a military hardware supplier, America will give some military hardware but not the cutting edge stuff. You can't have your cake and eat it India.

[@Joe-King]

That really pisses me off...it's "you can't eat your cake and have it too".

[@RealitikDaily]

I hope so, I would rather give our technology to india than betrayers like us aus and uk

[@aravindrajamani5699]

Are you really from France ?

[@RealitikDaily]

@@aravindrajamani5699 Yes, why?

[@aravindrajamani5699]

@@RealitikDaily Just for confirmation purpose, now days most of them doing like that with fake ID. That's why ask you.

[@RealitikDaily]

@@aravindrajamani5699 lol

[@devfra9862]

He is willing to give ? As if it's a toffy and he owns it 🤣🤣🤣

[@gerardodeguzman9802]

france sale submarine to india need ,,,uk,us ,,sale submarine to australia

[@davidhimmelsbach557]

New Delhi is just going to be compelled to up its game. It needs SSNs that can hazard Red China's economy at the Strait of Malacca. Diesel-Electric power plants just cant' get that job done. Beijing does not fear New Delhi's SSBNs. The CCP figures on its aggression staying below atomic release. BUT, Beijing does fear having its single most critical trade route utterly shut down, single-handedly, by the Indian Navy... with SSNs. That Australia is going to soon have such a capability is driving the CCP crazy. The deal obviously sets the stage for the UK to base its SSNs -- on rotation -- in Australian ports. Perth and Darwin immediately spring to mind. Further down the road, look to see Taiwan and Japan fielding SSNs. I don't see how they won't. This is the natural result of Wolf Warrior diplomacy.

[@1337flite]

More likely US/UK SSNs and any major surface combatants would be based in Perth and Sydney as that is where the RAN main fleet bases are, so that is where the logisitics and expertise to support them would be best. Air assets are more likely to go to Darwin and the more northern bases (Curtin, Tindall) And Perth and Sydney as a lot closer to Adelaide in South Australia where the shipyards that built the existing Australian SSs and DDGs as well as which will build the Australian SSN when that happens.

[@davidhimmelsbach557]

@@1337flite Within the USN, tradition tells us that SSNs // SSBNs are kept AWAY from other fleet combatant ships -- even in port. There's not a lot of cross-over in terms of support functions. Whatever they do need will be custom to their ships. ( At 10,000 tons + , you can't call them boats anymore.) So, it's anyone's guess as to how basing will be worked out. I can say that in the grander sense, any submarine response to a CCP provocation will be an emergency if not a panic deployment. So having bases close to the Strait of Malacca is a serious consideration. SSNs are the obvious and primary threat to any PLAN scheme to steal the South China Sea. It may come to pass that it's re-named the ASEAN sea.

[@Cray-wilder]

Make your own!

[@sairag3958]

We don't have population like America who pays taxes in millions and we don't take any other countries resources like us took from afgan,Vietnam and many other countries

[@shankarvelt]

Don't woryy friends. Even 100rupees toys also, they have providing poor quality, they don't know how to make national security, wepons...

[@jesuscordeiro1897]

Yes, France will definitely give us used nuclear submarine - the west is always trying to replenish their inventory - we are the best chutiyaas in the world - Modi Alibaba and 40 HaraamChor are also eager to buy used hardware - the commission is huge and my man Modi is great in making his friends happy and rich - Jai Jawan Jai Kissan

[@singularity-6339]

India should spend money building toilets throughout the country. Don't waste it on weapons.

[@ayushmalviya8698]

We have one named Pakistan.

[@DrGeller]

I will be back tomorrow

[@komyanmarmtlayonetawgyinld8322]

Myanmar NUG တရားသောစစ်အောင်ရမည်

[@jaz3021]

You can’t say 5 members! 4 yes USA , Russia, UK , France ! Because China’s technically in Navel Nuclear reactors aren’t that successful they make more noise than other countries submarine! And Can be easily dictated by Japanese, Indian and USA navies ! So can’t say 5 Also India has that that capability to build a Nuclear sub but we need more advance Nuclear rectors !!! And can’t count Chinese Ghatya technology!!! It’s same comparing Rickshaw with Ferrari !!!

[@princeofheaven19]

We have the best tech from the Russians the akula class subs no need for French tech

[@andrewlambert7246]

India doesnt need any other countries reactors. India is world leader in nuclear tech and has built its own naval reactor. India also has Russia as its most trustworthy partner as pm Modi has said.