India's First Indigenous Carrier INS Vikrant Is Advanced and Powerful

INS Vikrant proudly serves in the Indian Navy as the nation's first domestically built aircraft carrier. This glorious vessel CLASS is positioned as the seventh largest among global carriers. INS Vikrant is expected to achieve full operational status by November 2023.
The ship is equipped with approximately 2,200 compartments, tailored to accommodate a crew of approximately 1,600 individuals, which includes dedicated cabins for women officers and sailors.
The carrier is capable of accommodating approximately 30 aircraft, encompassing a diverse mix of both fixed-wing and rotary-wing aircraft. This includes Russian-made MiG-29K fighters and Ka-31 airborne early-warning helicopters, alongside Indian-manufactured Dhruv utility helicopters and U.S.-produced MH-60R maritime helicopters. Notably, on February 6, 2023, the carrier achieved two successful arrested landings, involving MiG-29Ks and a HAL Tejas (Naval Variant).
Vikrant is equipped with a robust array of defense systems, including a 32-cell VLS (Vertical Launch System) for the Barak 8 Surface-to-Air Missile (SAM), enhancing its anti-aircraft capabilities.
Additionally, it features four Otobreda 76mm dual-purpose cannons and four AK-630 Close-In Weapon Systems (CIWS) in place, providing rapid and effective defense against incoming threats.
Join our KZbin channel by clicking here: bit.ly/3asNo2n
Find us on Instagram: bit.ly/3PM21xW
Find us on Facebook: bit.ly/3t2Huvb
Find us on Twitter: bit.ly/3wQfXzA
Find us on TikTok: bit.ly/3wNsBOu
Get the latest stories: interestingengineering.com/
Support IE for high-quality journalism: interestingengineering.com/su...

[@Interestingengineeringofficial]

⚙ Want to know more about the latest tech and innovations? Don’t Miss Out! *SUBSCRIBE & HIT THE BELL* 👉bit.ly/SubscribeNowIE

[@theexponent3834]

Go India. Stay strong my brothers. Filipino here.

[@user-ub1xr8md1g]

Love from India 😊

[@user-kj9cs8ok9n]

We pakistanis are also trying to make indigenous 70 cc bike

[@faizansiddique572]

Lage raho munna bhai

[@Anirbannandi2001]

​@@faizansiddique572🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭

[@faizansiddique572]

@@Anirbannandi2001 sahi to baat hai na

[@Anirbannandi2001]

@@faizansiddique572 Aap kon se desh se ho?

[@faizansiddique572]

@@Anirbannandi2001 India

[@Qwerty01012]

Support india from Philippines 🇵🇭

[@massimotorricelli9310]

@Qwerty01012 both countries has a one problem china

[@koushikboda7289]

Love you too bruh❤

[@isleephungry]

Both are Poor country 😢

[@Rudraiya]

​@@isleephungryIndia is not a poor country it was mad poor now India is 5th largest and fastest growing economy in the world

[@Krakengamingus7206]

@@RudraiyaEven India has good economy, it will never change the fact that India is one of most dirtiest countries in the world. Lmao “Indian food agh”

[@PeekabooGram]

India has every reason to be proud of this accomplishment. Military technology takes a lot of time, talent, and resources to develop. Especially if you're not willing to steal it like some of India's neighbors in the region do.

[@Xinnie_The_Flu]

Shots fired at me??😂

[@Kenny-yl9pc]

🤣🤣🤣@@Xinnie_The_Flu

[@Dr.Kay_R]

​@@Xinnie_The_Flu🤣

[@BasedTruthSeeker]

@@Xinnie_The_Flu-1000 Social Credit. Your family going to camp now 👍🏽

[@Xinnie_The_Flu]

@@BasedTruthSeeker nice name. #PKMKBForever

[@flaminmongrel6955]

Navies used to be a thing of great importance in ancient Indian empires, time to go back.

[@Dr.Kay_R]

Time to go back is wrong sentence 'Bring that time back' is correct

[@puneet90]

As a matter of fact, India has not maintained strong navies historically. Only South Indian empires like cholas had significant naval presence. In fact if India had a strong navy then Britishers could not have colonised it so easily.

[@tusharsharma8952]

@@puneet90 source? kahan se quote kar raha hai ki gujrat ports me navy nahi thi? fact hai to quote kar?

[@puneet90]

@@tusharsharma8952 waise toh tjh jaise logo ko mjhe justify krne ki zarurat nai hai but still, as per Indian Navy "Indians took to the sea for trade and commerce rather than for political ends. Thus, the period up to about 16th century witnessed peaceful sea-borne commerce, cultural and traditional exchange between countries." Now if you know more than the Indian Navy then I have no idea what we can do about your delusion.

[@puneet90]

@@tusharsharma8952 Agar tune Indian history padhi hoti toh aise sawal krta hi nahi. And this is an objective information, don't try to see it through a "lens".

[@gevorggasparyan4257]

For a country to be successful on the seas, it needs to have at least two aircraft carriers. Because in case one is sunk, the planes will have the other one to land on. As an Armenian proud to see India turing into a technological jagernout with slow but very steady steps. Much love from Armenia.

[@ajit.yadav.]

India has 2 aircraft carriers...INS Vikrant this one and the older INS Vikramaditya

[@anonymous-zt9xw]

Third is under construction

[@pranayghosh4413]

India actually at max needs 7 aircraft carriers, 2/3 on either side of Arabian sea and Bay of bengal, 1 in the andaman & nicobar islands and 1 in maintenance. Considering INS Vikramaditya wont operate in the navy past 15 years from now, 1 is in construction right now named, INS Vishal and would be in service by 2030. By 2047 India should have at leastin total 5 carriers with 2 of them being supercarriers and nuclear powered.

[@anonymous-zt9xw]

@@pranayghosh4413 I guess officials know more than you

[@pranayghosh4413]

@@anonymous-zt9xw freedom of speech my friend. It was just an opinion though

[@Kenny-yl9pc]

It's nice to know that India a strong and vibrant democracy to be aligned with the West; EU, US, Japan and Australia and all united to stop Chinas aggression and abuses around the Pacific!

[@Kevin-fq3zh]

you count on india at your own peril

[@saiprateek5779]

Exactly Kenny, what many narcissistic racist people say it's the opposite of all the claims by them.. India has understood the abilities of western countries like USA, Israel and France. India even joined hands on Military and in Civilian Sectors too.. Unlike old government, Congress, which took like 65 years to build GDP of $1.5Trillion.. but now government, BJP, with Modi as PM has generated same no of GDP hike within 10 years.. Some in India don't want to agree with me on this, none will in Foreign countries too.. I bow to the appreciation you give to this glorious country INDIA😊

[@Rijerson]

😅😅

[@petergittos2875]

India has done a fantastic job with this aircraft carrier and should be applauded for making such a good looking ship and kitting it out with everything to keep their sailors and pilots up to 100% fitness especially with all their up to date medical facilities. Hats off to India

[@simonbrown7455]

While Indian arms companies sell weapons to the Junta in Myanmar😅

[@myadvocacy9159]

We support india from Philippines 💪🇵🇭🇮🇳

[@reekreason2082]

❤ 🇵🇭

[@ArunSharma-ug6jf]

Philippines 💝

[@tanyi5524]

With what support? By shouting?

[@ashrithrao06]

Indian Navy is soon going to reorder another Vikrant Class carrier. And also they are designing a 3rd Super-carrier with 65000+ displacement and EMALS Technology called INS Vishal (means Huge) to replace the Russian origin INS Vikramaditya. Indian Navy always wanted to use 3 carriers at a same time. One each for Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal and another in reserve.

[@TomW-ks3gp]

Indian “soon” means 20+ years. And the core parts will be all from other countries. Lol

[@ashrithrao06]

@@TomW-ks3gp Kochi Shipyard Limited, the builder of Vikrant Class has told that they shall deliver the ship within 5 years of deal. And INS Vikrant is 76% indigenous and the 2nd ship shall have more indigenous content. Indian Navy will retire Russian Origin INS Vikramaditya within 15 years, so they already started designing of new 65000+ tons displacement Super Carrier.

[@durgeshsss]

​@@TomW-ks3gpindia can built next carrier in 5-6 years ....but navy wants bigger (may be nuclear) and catapult carrier which will take time for redesigning...or india can take blue prints from uk...will is practical for time saving

[@yashasvisingh6694]

​@@durgeshsssthey already have taken the help UK France and USA are providing help to India in 65000 tonne carrier USA has decided to sell the EMALS technology and UK media has reported that India has bought blueprints for Elizabeth class carriers

[@SamuraiMonkey79]

​​@@ashrithrao06Anna ignore him he is either a Porki or their new found Father's,the bat munchers (golgappe eating wumao's courtesy of 16 Bihar Regiment)!! Vande Matram

[@amantemarinas2182]

I only have a few dollars to bet with. But I will put my money on an Indian-made aircraft carrier than a Chinese-built aircraft carrier. Filipino-American watching in Virginia, USA.

[@anandverma8263]

Thank you so much for your trust and support🙏 Love from 🇮🇳

[@fatdoi003]

can i bet against you?

[@6haha]

😂good luck

[@bibliophile5700]

You loosed😢​@@fatdoi003

[@rogerliu3510]

I can tell why you only have a few dollars.

[@rohans31]

Thanks to our current Govt. for this. They gave the utmost priority to the Make in India initiative and expedited every process related to it. Kudos to the govt 👍

[@himanshumadhan6376]

Yar tum log na kuch bhi. Pura gyan lia karo.. 2005 se bn rha h. First tha islye time lga. Second will take 6 Years because r&d is already done and infrastructure is ready. Tejas ka First version b pehle bn gya tha..arihant bhi. Chndrayan 1 bhi. Mars mission bhi. Arjun tNk bhi agni prithvi brahmos etc also We were going to purchase 126 aircrafts in 2014 which this government delayed and we got only 36. Gap between India and china keep increasing. Now after 10 years we need much more. After china captured Indian land in Ladakh and russia attacked ukriane government rose from slumber, and realised war won't wait for their model. They realised every interest is safe if country is safe. So last 1 year or so government doing fine job, because now they realise its urgent.

[@kimchiba4570]

Tell your gov to build toilets and feed the hungry first

[@RahulChauhan-to6nj]

@@kimchiba4570 jealous much?

[@benthekeeshond545]

I read from other sources that this ship is basically the integration of many different parts from different countries. The last time this ship showed off itself without fighter planes on deck. What use an aircraft carrier has with no aircraft?

[@albanroylyngdoh1296]

Be wise bro! Don't mix government and politics with our Defense, our India

[@DutchelandArmy]

India should return to the seas Look we used to control one of the wealthiest empires when navies of chola Empire were kings of indian Ocean.. When we stopped that..we became weaker and wealer Our strength should be retained from the seas..not just land routes

[@Peter-jo6yu]

Better not to be proud of mythological past that has been exaggerated 😂😂

[@ARVINDYADAV-es6qk]

​@@Peter-jo6yuhistorical chola control 2100 year indian ocean

[@ripleydead8041]

History isnt mythology A hole

[@jsthereforfun1648]

​@@Peter-jo6yulaughing without any reason is a sign of Lunacy and don't cry and apply burnol in your ❤️‍🔥

[@untitled.devlope.together]

​@@Peter-jo6yuilleducated

[@ajinkyagaikwad26]

This ship has 4 Multirole Melara cannons, 32 VLS for SAM missiles like Barak 8 & Barak 8-ER

[@purabparmar3898]

That's better defended than even the USN fat nuclear carriers.

[@heavenlypot]

The Indian Indus valley civilization had shipbuilding and ports which were used to trade with Mesopotamians and Egyptians. Then the Gupta Empire and Roman Empire trade thrived flooding Indian coffers with Roman gold in exchange for Indian silk and Wootz steel. The chola empire conquered a lot of southeast Asia with the use of their robust navy and finally great Maratha King Shivaji revived the Indian naval glory by establishing a navy that challenged Europeans in the Arabian sea. India has a rich shipbuilding and naval history. So this is just the start of a lethal Indian Navy.

[@TamBramThankyouMam]

Don’t think south East Asia was conquered with force. Or even conquered in the first place.

[@ChiSa123]

@@TamBramThankyouMam *South East Asia ... and you're right that it was not conquered by force. The King's merely went on trade expeditions and eventually settled and the Empire expanded amicably. South East Asia acknowledges the Indian cultural heritage it has.

[@lourdesjohn261]

I feel India's 4th and 5th,6th Carriers should be named after greatest martime emperors of bharat. INS RAJENDRA CHOLA INS RAJA RAJA INS CHATRAPATI SHIVAJI

[@kaushalpaswan77]

👍👍

[@lourdesjohn261]

@@KS-op9bb PNS Donkey

[@lourdesjohn261]

@@KS-op9bb PNS donkey

[@lmfaodude]

@@KS-op9bb INS hater

[@ChiSa123]

I think it is deliberate that they are not named after them. It is safer to name land based Navy bases after Emperors. Especially, Emperors that are closer to people's hearts i.e. whom they have an emotional connect with.

[@14daysurl]

Same vikrant class with small modifications is under consideration already Indian navy sent proposal to Indian cabinet 😊 So that means India will have three operational aircraft carriers by 2030

[@virtualpilot2235]

Vikramaditya might end her terms of service by then ngl

[@Charvak-Atheist]

Same type ka nahi banana chahiye. Next Carrier, Nuclear Powerd banana chahiye and not desiel Powerd.

[@gourabneogi2886]

no 4, another 1 is being made, unless our Navy retires Vikramaditya

[@paramhayaran2052]

I think we got 4 now idk

[@derekng958]

INS Vikrant is powerful than all USA carrier. !

[@sanaksanandan]

Lots of pissed off Chinese and Pakistanis in the comment section. Their fear is nice.

[@mingmuyiyang8615]

I'm Chinese. No Chinese people in China see India as an enemy. Because India is not qualified to become a competitor to China. We Chinese people despise India and the Indian army.

[@mingmuyiyang8615]

In the eyes of us Chinese, India is a spineless country. The army established by India has no combat power in front of China.

[@yashkumar3196]

​@@mingmuyiyang8615so if we block ur trade route near Indonesia and India ,what will u do?

[@mingmuyiyang8615]

@@yashkumar3196 I am an ordinary Chinese, and I don't know what we Chinese people can do. Are you happy to hear such a reply?

[@mingmuyiyang8615]

@@yashkumar3196 I hope Indians read carefully and experience with their hearts. The huge difference in the founding of China and India determines the biggest difference between India and China. Just look at the modern history of both countries and you will understand. India was colonized by Britain for more than 200 years. In 1947, Britain experienced World War II, with its strength greatly reduced and its position replaced by the United States. India took the opportunity to achieve independence through a "non violent and non cooperative" approach. In other words, India's independence has not experienced the test of blood and fire, so an independent country lacks cohesion and willpower, as well as a sense of national identity. Now let's talk about China. Since the British defeated the corrupt and incompetent Qing government in 1840, the Chinese people have been living in a state of deep suffering. Various disasters and wars followed one after another. At that time, China was very poor and backward, suffering various humiliations. Including the cession of Hong Kong and Macau, Taiwan becoming a Japanese colony, the Eight Nation Alliance burning the Old Summer Palace, and the subsequent comprehensive and brutal invasion of China by Japan. In 1931, Japan launched a full-scale invasion of China. From 1931 to 1945, the war lasted for 14 years. The Chinese military and civilians rose up to resist, fought in bloody battles for fourteen years, and suffered 30 million casualties, ultimately achieving victory. Do you know why there are so many casualties in China? There are hundreds of reasons, and I will only give an example to illustrate one of them: Chinese troops are in conflict with the Japanese army. Often, if the number of Chinese soldiers participating in the war is 100, they only have 20 to 30 firearms. The remaining soldiers did not give up resistance or surrender. They bravely fought against the Japanese machine guns and cannons with machetes, steel forks, and wooden sticks until they sacrificed. This spirit of returning to death and never retreating is the Chinese spirit. 30 million casualties! Do you think this can happen in India? For India, it is zero casualties because India's knees are soft. India will soon give up resistance. Do you know why there was the "Nanjing Massacre"? Because of the desperate resistance of the Chinese military and civilians, they will never surrender or give up. After Japan broke through Nanjing, it was first to vent its anger and secondly to scare off other Chinese soldiers and civilians who were resisting. However, the "Nanjing Massacre" not only did not deter any Chinese people, but also further stirred up the resistance of the Chinese people. The establishment of New China has gone through the test of blood and fire. Do you know why the Chinese national flag is red? That's because the establishment of New China was bought with the blood of countless Chinese ancestors, and we Chinese people will always remember it. From 1945 to 1949, during the Chinese Civil War, the Kuomintang fled to Taiwan. Originally, the Chinese people thought they could live a peaceful life they had long longed for, but in 1950, the Korean War broke out, lasting three years. The Chinese Volunteer Army successfully resisted the US northward route without air or sea control, outdated military equipment, and extremely poor logistics, at the cost of losing hundreds of thousands of brave PLA soldiers. As for the 1962 Sino Indian War, which India never forgets and feels extremely humiliated, in the eyes of us Chinese, it was not a war at all. Firstly, it only took 32 days. Secondly, from 1959 to 1961, China experienced the most difficult three years after its founding, during which many people starved to death. In 1962, India's economy far surpassed that of China. The United States, Soviet Union, and Britain both support India. At that time, India implemented a "forward policy" and used elite troops to attack China. We Chinese people really don't want to go to war. The Chinese troops who joined the war with India in 1962 were ordinary border defense forces, not regular People's Liberation Army. In China, military personnel are known as the "cutest people". There is a Chinese proverb: without a country, there is no home, and military personnel are the backbone of the country. Thank you to our brave soldiers of the People's Liberation Army who are always ready to defend the border of our motherland. No matter how India develops its military, it cannot surpass China. Whether in the past, present, or future, China can always defeat India. This is determined by the history and culture of both countries. Chinese people value the spirit of dedication and sacrifice. Do not surrender, do not yield, resist to the death, and face death as if returning on the battlefield. If Chinese soldiers surrender on the battlefield, it is a great shame, and the spirit of dying rather than yielding is deeply engraved in the bones of every Chinese person. These are all things that Indians do not possess. So, even now or in the future, India will never be able to defeat China. Now, do you think India can stand tall in the world like China? Absolutely impossible.

[@changeyourself2777]

It may not be the most powerful but we are proud of the fact that it was made in our country and now we have the technology to make aircraft carriers. Similarly, a country can develop well by not being dependent on others but by developing them on its own. Making things and learning. We may not get success in the beginning but if we do it again and again we will definitely get it. We are proud that our country is moving towards self-reliant India day by day.❤️🇮🇳

[@TimBrianTufuga]

Impressive, congratulations India.

[@user-ov5pf8jv2w]

Congtats India

[@derekng958]

INS Vikrant is powerful than all USA carrier. !

[@Intellectualhv]

no bro

[@Putin61]

Seriously Congratulations to India ❤

[@emmanuelwekesa976]

it will be interesting if you feature Brahmos missile system.

[@R-C-R]

Brahmos anti-ship is already use in our kolkata class destroyer and talwar class frigate

[@prathit7541]

Vikranth has BrahMos missiles 😉

[@tren133]

Putting all those VLS tubes on a carrier is a waste of resources, compromises space on the ship, and is less effective at protecting the carrier. There is a reason the American and Chinese carriers carry zero missiles. Instead they carry and launch AEW aircraft, which will search out possible threats, and then all your escort guided missile frigate/destroyer/cruisers will use THEIR missiles to destroy the threat long before it gets close to the carrier itself. The carrier just needs the best CIWS system available as a last line of defense against a stray missile that might get through. Instead the Vikrant is carrying its OWN air defense missiles, has a near obsolete CIWS setup, and on top of that, which ever foreign company that manufactured the cannon managed to con the Indian navy into installing them onto the carrier as well. GUNS???? What are you supposed to do with guns on an aircraft carrier in this modern age. Even WWII era carriers didn't sport cannons!

[@Sinner85]

​@@tren133those guns are ciws pal.. even us carriers carry essam and ciws

[@tren133]

@@Sinner85 US and Chinese carriers do not use VLS medium range missiles, because that's what their destroyer escorts are for. What they DO USE are two things: short range anti-air missiles (such as the ESSM) in trainable HORIZONTAL launchers suited for close in defense, as well as the highest quality CIWS they have, as last line of defense against any supersonic missiles that have gotten through all other layers of defense. What does the Vikrant carry? 1. 32 cell VLS which either carry Barak 8 for medium range air defense (which the destroyers should be doing from far away) or Barak 1 short range air defense. Except vertically launched short range air defense will not give you good enough reaction time compared with trainable launcher like the US and Chinese use. 2. 4 AK-630 CIWS units, which are some of the most antiquated CIWS systems in the world, and is considered only adequate to defend against subsonic threats. India does not make its own CIWS AFAIK. 3. Most bizarrely, 4 OTO Melara 76 mm guns. Essentially a 76 mm flak cannon, and it is even worse than the AK-630 and won't be able to intercept any type of modern anti-ship missile, but the Italian consultants hired by the Indian Navy somehow conned them into buying FOUR of these babies for their brand new aircraft carrier!

[@death_parade]

No mention of the Indian Combat Management System CMS-71 that has Cooperative Engagement Capability which only a select few Navies in the world possess.

[@ion8264]

what is that?

[@death_parade]

@@ion8264 What is Cooperative Engagement Capability? Alright, say that you have one Indian frigate acting as a screen 30 km out on the flank from the main Indian aircraft carrier fleet that has a couple of destroyers escorting a carrier and a support ship. And this frigate screen detects an incoming threat of around a 100 anti-ship missiles that pop up on the radar due to their hi-hi-lo flight profile, hurtling towards the main carrier fleet. Now the frigate alone can hope to intercept at max 32 anti-ship missiles before they get in range of the carrier fleet and when they get close to the carrier, interception would become much more difficult because by then the anti-ship missiles will start flying a sea-skimming profile, making it harder for the S-band radars to detect until they are very close. Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC) allows this one frigate to intercept all 100 anti-ship missiles before they get close to the carrier. How? Because it slaves the VLS in the both the destroyers and the carrier to the frigate's combat management system. So when the frigate detects the incoming 100 anti-ship missiles, it fires all of its own SAM missiles as well as half the missiles of the main fleet at the incoming threat. Without CEC, the main fleet would have to wait for the threat to appear on its own radars before being able to fire its own missiles by which time it'd be too late. If it was a Royal Navy carrier fleet instead, it would be toast because Royal Navy doesn't have CEC yet. In near future, Navy will extend this capability to allow even fighter jets from Indian carriers and drones to do the job that the frigate did in the above scenario.

[@The__Leo69]

​@@ion8264 basically multiple vessels/aircrafts operate together using software systems to efficiently take out targets or perform surveillance, as the case may be.

[@itsslimsumomagic]

The fact that we can make air craft carriers even though we have to import some parts ( its understandable that not every component can be indigenous), the capability of making it on our own is remarkable and great.

[@justfun1384]

Dude no country in the world can build an aircraft carrier with 100% it's own resources, hence Indigenously US made/Indian Made/France made aircraft Carriers, all have components imported from outside

[@datianlongan5567]

Just the look of this mighty warship is enough to make any potential adversary trembles with fear

[@kinte1870]

😂😂

[@jsthereforfun1648]

​@@kinte1870you Pakistani can laugh in your wooden boats 😂 and laughing without any reason is a sign of Lunacy

[@zixiangwei3647]

so funny

[@GrindingMidnight]

The Gerald R Ford would like a word

[@jsthereforfun1648]

@@GrindingMidnight just like how USS Enterprise fleed in the sight of Russian made submarines in 1971 Bangladesh Liberation war 😂😂

[@thetechreview369]

So many US Homeless are crying in comment section...

[@Dr.Kay_R]

They are from NATO nations who can't build even basic ammunition and launch their own satellites. Showing how big their daddy is

[@ShivaKingg]

They are pakistani imposters using fake names .not US peoples

[@rajeshkadupukotla1285]

The total population of US is equal to the total homeless people in India. Shut your mouth

[@Shivshakti998]

THis is just the beginning...can't even imagine how powerful bharat/india will be by 22nd century.

[@arturobayangos1223]

India was able to send a moon rover without COPYING. Unlike it’s neighbor.

[@SumanNath25]

When British first saw Indian naval vessels & engineering they immediately felt threat to their own industries and decided to finish Indian manufacturing to secure their own. Like a parasite they drained India to their max capacity but the nerves and neurons and the soul... remains.

[@Mrcoops85]

That Carrier is a turd mate. You’re not even included in the conversation when it comes to projecting power overseas.

[@sewerrat]

@@Mrcoops85Lol Britain isn't even the powerhouse of Europe anymore. We have great relations with the French and Germans who run the show. 👍 We'll slowly progress. Keep insulting.

[@ramsengar1761]

​@@Mrcoops85 Keep crying, greatness can't be achieved in one day but with time and effort it can be achieved we are better than Brits in the space sector and the second domain will be the defence wait for next ten to 15 years

[@manjunathmnm]

​@@Mrcoops85Ungrateful Britain is a totally insignificant Isolated Small Island struck in its illusion past...

[@hiteshrohra2991]

​@@Mrcoops85 still better than aircraft carrier in uk which broke down

[@ahsanfarooq55]

congratz India. great achievement respect from Pakistan

[@swastik6705]

Thanks from india❤. Hope we became supportive partners in future ✌

[@Userandmad]

When u don't know its for u 😂😂

[@ahsanfarooq55]

@@Userandmad we have CM-400AKG missiles to naturalie the threat of Aircraft carrier. i just appreciated india to build this carrier at home.

[@user-gz2ot4oy8n]

Pakistani kab sudhroge tumlog😂

[@deathmetal7976]

​@@ahsanfarooq55 INS vikrant Range 15 thousand Pakistan Shaheen 3 small made in China maximum Range 2750 😭😭🙏

[@Kalki-RM]

Chinese bots in comments 🤡

[@abhinibeshghosh1742]

Not actually Chinese but pakistani representing them as Chinese 😂 son and father relationship 😂

[@to_serveMyNation]

Salute to the makers & hard workers! 🫡🇮🇳

[@govindmadhav6421]

India 🇮🇳 ❤🔥

[@bubbalo3388]

Not being nuclear and having a ski jump limits it. But it depends on their purpose for it. For global missions it would be limited because of refueling and aircraft having less payload and burning more fuel. But for protecting their local interests it works just fine.

[@rohitb5834]

Vikrant costs 4 Bil$. A same sized CATOBAR design and Nuke powered would cost no less than 8 Bil$, and a longer build time. India needs multiple Carriers in short duration. So if i have 8 Bil$, i would go for 2 Vikrant Class Carriers, than 1 INS Vishal (The nuke powered CATOBAR Carrier planned by the Indian Navy).

[@n3v3rforgott3n9]

@@rohitb5834 Catobar design could easily double the sortie rate if not more.

[@rohitb5834]

@@n3v3rforgott3n9 But can 1 CATOBAR Carrier be at 2 places at once? India needs atleast 2 Carriers in theory, one for the Western Seaboard against Pakistan and one for the Eastern Sea board against China. Apart from theory, in practical, it needs 3 Carriers, because usually at any given time, there will be 1 Carrier undergoing repairs/maintenance while 2 Carriers are operational.

[@n3v3rforgott3n9]

@@rohitb5834 You will be having half or even less of the capabilities of a CATOBAR carrier. Frankly the distance it not so massive you need a carrier on both sides at all times. 1 Carrier being able to strike twice as many targets and put up its own EWACs and refueling aircraft is massive to help India control the Straights of Malacca which is the biggest strategical objective in the region. Will India have the planes, trained crew, and support vessels do man 2 or even 3 carrier strike groups in any short order.

[@rohitb5834]

@@n3v3rforgott3n9 Distance isnt massive? The distance is 2100 nm , or a 5-day sailing period from the Eastern to the Western seaboard or Vica versa. 5 days is a lot in war. India does not need a Carrier to control the Straits of Malacca. It has the Andaman and Nicobar Islands right at the entrance of the Malaccan strait. Having islands there with military bases and large airfields act like an "unsinkable aircraft carrier". India can completely block the straits there within a matter of hours if the need be, even today. I think the area where India needs it Carrier fleet is the Sunda Strait, between Java and Sumatra, lower down the world map. Thats another Strait where the Chinese fleet can enter the IOR. India will need a whole massive Carrier Battle Group there to block that strait in case of a war. Yes, India will have the planes, trained crew and support vessels for 3 Carrier Battle Groups by the early 2030s when the 3rd carrier enters service. Right now, it has 2 active Carrier Battle Groups. And i agree with the CATOBAR benefits, but before venturing into that, India needs to quickly cover its basic interests in the near future.

[@SaiShree1]

I N S VIKRANT 🥰

[@sanjaybhatikar]

Awesome!

[@sxevenle5290]

Very impressive, with a powerful swing as it moves across calm seas. 0:01

[@but_at_what_cost]

这样，它搭载的飞机就可以原地起飞了。

[@sallianz11]

that's an animated video clip

[@iimcrandomgamer711]

We already have around 80mw of nuclear rectors for submarine's. And currently working on the development of 190mw nuclear reactors. So possibly when we start to build 65k ton carrier possible we able Power it by nuclear power. Currently we have properly working Kaveri Marine gas turbine engein that have enough power to run 2500 to 3000 ton class ships. And nave already have plains for it. I just hope government start the development of more powerful marine gas turbine engein. On bases of kaveri Marine gas turbine engein for the future navy ships and submarine's.

[@piyushjoshii]

A country like ours which is surrounded by water from 3 sides its important to have have atleast 6 of these kind of Aircraft carriers. Considering the threat from all sides India has finally realised the importance of protecting its seas.

[@urdailygamr9229]

These are extremely expensive to build as well as maintain and India would do fine with just three of them.India should invest in frigates and battleships more.These are just white elephants and you should not build more than you absolutely need.US is building so many for their imperialistic purposes

[@nike5428]

Brilliant

[@craigkdillon]

This is an accomplishment. But, it means little until India has enough carriers to keep one or two deployed all the time. Also, IMO, India needs to have a CATOBAR true carrier. Catapult launched planes can carry more weapons and more fuel, increasing their lethality.

[@sohanelavarthy5397]

True but it’s too expensive to develop given our military budget

[@craigkdillon]

@@sohanelavarthy5397 India's economy is growing. Firms are moving out of China, and many will go to India. I expect India to become a true regional power with a powerful army, navy, and air force. Not there yet, but pretty far along, IMO.

[@rohitb5834]

@@craigkdillon There was a huge debate- spend more on Carriers or Nuclear submarines? INS Vishal, a 65,000 tons CATOBAR EMALS design was proposed as India's 3rd Active Carrier, along with a fleet of 9 additional Nuclear Submarines. Offcourse both couldn go together, budget constraints. So finally, the Indian Navy decided to tone it down to a 45,000 tons STOBAR, similar to the above INS Vikrant, as its 3rd Carrier, and most likely proceed with the 9 Nuclear Submarines over the next 15 years. INS Vishal will be taken up in the late 2020s to replace India's INS Vikramaditya .

[@craigkdillon]

@@rohitb5834 Thanks for the info. Money constraints force all decisions.

[@rohitb5834]

@@craigkdillonalso another point, India is the 4th most powerful military on the planet, and 4th or 5th most powerful Navy. Its also in a status of a "Potential Superpower", and is the world's 3rd largest naval shipbuilder in terms of number of Naval ships under construction at the moment. So im pretty sure it has already passed the status of a "Regional power" as of 2023.

[@ravisingh-vp1tp]

Meanwhile driver on the stearing - Mai nikla oo gaddi leke 😂😂❤❤❤

[@jpajpaassi6614]

🕉 Satyameva Jayate: Truth and Honesty and Reality gets created when Good Thoughts, Good Deeds, Good Acts are allowed to achieve the small steps needed for the correct choices and correct decisions to be made. Satyameva Jayate

[@user-fm3xz9nm5d]

India has an experience of operating Aircraft Carriers for more than 5 decades, something China will never be able to catch-up with considering they've started operating AC's as well now.

[@michaelzap8528]

Indian typtical logic is like this: In 2005, China GDP is 3 trillion , In 2022 India GDP is 3 trillion, so it means India is just 18 yrs behind China. so In 1980 Bill gates has 100 dollars in his bank account, in 2023 i have 100 dollars in my pocket, so Bill gate is just 43 yrs ahead me , after 43 years , i will be the next Bill gates?

[@user-fm3xz9nm5d]

@@michaelzap8528 applying first hand Aircraft carrier operational experience and technical experties to economy 🤲 proper churchish logical woah 🤦‍♂️

[@gf-ek9ps]

China catch up? India is far behind China.

[@_KRONET_108]

​@@gf-ek9psyou need the dose of current affairs dear.....

[@gf-ek9ps]

@@_KRONET_108 Type 002 last drill 600 times take off & landed. This time just happening now close to 600 and increasing in South China Sea according to the Japanese news.Can Indian AC do that.There are no match between India and China.

[@AdityaKumar-nv3or]

Proud to see Indian warship here

[@geodavids]

It is a proud moment but catapult should have been fitted as it allows aircraft to take more ordenances and a bigger aircraft carrier which could carry Awacs like the American aircraft carriers. Raffles for the aircraft carrier instead of Mig aircraft.

[@KarmHeeDharmHai]

I think India may be planning to move straight to vertical take off and landing aircraft which will not require the catapult system at all. My understanding is that Rafale-M have recently been decided for the carriers. I don’t think India plans on following/copying American equipment. I think India is now looking few steps ahead and/or fully ingenious defence equipment. We would have to if we don’t want to be CONSTANTLY trailing behind other powers and if we want to break the cycle. Also, American and Chinese are invading/offensive forces while India is a defensive force. The requirements are not the same and frankly neither is the budget.

[@Vikrant-S-Khurmi]

I appreciate all your lovely comments. God bless you all 🙏

[@mostbeautifulfiji4u220]

The reason India is not a global superpower is because India does not project it's military power in other areas of the world, INS Vikrant is diesel powered and can not operate far from refuelling port or friendly ports hence India only uses it in the Indian ocean near to home port. However, India does not create nuclear aircraft carriers as it has no interest in taking it's military power far from home. India still remains a nation that has never attacked or invaded another country and has always defended itself during war.

[@rohitb5834]

India's Aircraft Carriers, Destroyers, Frigates has operational ranges of 8000 kms - 10,000 kms + and can sail for 45 days+, India has 4 large replenishment ships that can double the range and endurance as well as overseas ports for refueling. However with the China and Pakistan threat, 70% of the fleet has to remain in the Indian Ocean Region. But the Indian Navy often deploys smaller fleets to the South China Sea, East China Sea and Western Mediterranean showing its Blue water capabilities.

[@diksh777]

8000 km range is this less for you😂

[@Sandy-rv9tv]

​@@diksh777FYI India's coastline is 7,516 kms. Allowing for coastal clearances for a ship this size implies up-down coastal length of > 8,000 kms

[@farukhsheikh5790]

As long as the Indian Ocean is secure, we don't have the need to project power in Pacific or Atlantic Ocean

[@YourFuhrer1933]

​@@Sandy-rv9tvyou just lack basic knowledge, there is no relation of coastline length with missile ranges

[@cuckoonut1208]

I'll bet the food in there is amazeballz.

[@mainmain5303]

😂

[@MegaSodom]

Looks so clean.

[@essaar1956]

Great, due to its vast ocean cover and also to maintain equal power as per our neighbours, India need two more such carriers. Of course, it is epensive to manage but due to the magnanimous size of our shore and also two critical and sensitive islets on east and west, we had to induct two more to safe guard our watery borders.

[@Captain-wf1mf]

Another one made in india carrier coming

[@northatlanticterroristorga1222]

Please correct your word, 5% made in India 95 % from Russia

[@rajeshkadupukotla1285]

@@northatlanticterroristorga1222exactly.. finally someone with brain

[@dharmicwisdom9818]

​@@northatlanticterroristorga1222Ur mentioning INS Vikramaditya. Actually two more are coming. One is a replica of INS Vikrant and another larger one after that to replace the purchased from Russia, INS Vikramaditya.

[@amos325]

@@dharmicwisdom9818and all of them are ski jump-50years old technology

[@dharmicwisdom9818]

@@amos325 The third aircraft carrier build in Bharat will have EMALS.

[@clarkarthurcanete132]

Much better than the Chinese US aircraft carrier copycat

[@YadwinderSingh-xb2jj]

Fun fact : India is a 7th largest country and INS VIKRANT is also 7th largest carrier 😉😉 NICE DETIALING BY INDIA👍👍

[@santhoshkrish]

Today Defense Minister has said that Indian navy will go for 6 carriers Vikranth is just a beginning.

[@SuperMyckie]

How india has gotten way better than their Neighbor Pakistan though

[@pyrioncelendil]

Not really something you'd see talked about on an engineering channel. Explaining why Pakistan is damn near a failed state is best left to geopolitics channels.

[@mr.nobody125]

Better choices, different preferences,

[@sayansp1105]

We choose education over religion

[@jiteshverma9589]

Heard of Izlamic jeehad?

[@martin96991]

Moral values, ethics, education, future planing, hardwork, patriotism And putting country first over religion.❤️

[@katranaresh5609]

🇮🇳

[@SFFRN19]

India having it's Glow up era rn

[@ethanzhang1238]

This is amazing! I believe soon the Indian navy would surpass China! Congratulations!

[@tylerdurden4006]

Funny how every single westerner is ignoring the aircraft that are arming the carrier. 😂😂😂

[@killer-lordsmobile7099]

India is developing ted bf which will replace mig 29k and will be deployed on 3rd carrier

[@capteagle9]

​@@killer-lordsmobile7099bruh rafales would be deployed

[@killer-lordsmobile7099]

@@capteagle9 i was talking about indeginious option

[@capteagle9]

@@killer-lordsmobile7099 ya..but you need to mention that

[@rosetzu_nagasawa]

what "problems" did it encounter with MIG29k ? payment issue? as it stands today 27 Nov 2023, what aircraft does it has OPERATING on it?

[@marcd5196]

a few years back there was some problems with supply of spares for the Mig29K, and hence the operational levels were low. However , its much better since 2021. Currently, 21 Mig29K and 12 Helicopters serve on the Vikrant.

[@hiteshrohra2991]

It operates mig 29 and will be replaced by Rafael fighter jet

[@ltrond]

Go India! Love from China

[@tx9ju]

I thought only Indians liked to nod, but their ships did too😁

[@martinluther4720]

yeah by head nodding, Indians becme the richest ethnic group in the USA & UK. - CEOs of global 500 companies. - founders of highest unicorn companies in the US , of foreign birth. right in front of your rac-sit face....& there is nothing u can do about it. would love to see your reaction when Vivek Ramaswamy becomes US president.

[@xfxter]

Keep hating mf.... 😂

[@user-hr3xt6gy3u]

​@@martinluther4720The reality is that no one cares what India is doing, there is no threat.

[@prachisuryawanshi7359]

​@@user-hr3xt6gy3uat anytime India can become like china if we showed so much blind faith and sympathy towards one political party and in alcoholic state approved them to became communist, establish one party rule in happiest state.

[@OO27]

​@@martinluther4720 so what. Do you find it proud that india going to foreign and adoption citizenship of America. Do you think it is matter of proud? And stop doing shit

[@Mr.BR15]

India should make 3 more such Aircraft carrier .

[@namelesswarrior4760]

Yeah!

[@usforcessupporter]

And how is that?

[@jarigustafsson7620]

Ccp china: A sitting duck for our navy. Huthis: Look! A huge cargo vessel, FIRE!.

[@ParvathiKaruppiya]

இந்தியா

[@roystonpereira2887]

Where is the Engine built?

[@sohanelavarthy5397]

Licensed and built in india

[@Dj.95]

❤🇮🇳❤️

[@lingth]

Wonder what plane they will buy for it . Currently their prev one uses MiG-29K, they might get Rafale-M ..naval version of the Rafale since the Air force already has land based Rafale..

[@The__Leo69]

Preferably Tejas naval variant. Small, cheap, effective, indigenous.

[@lingth]

​@@The__Leo69nope they aren't Tejas is not even considered.. shows how much confidence they have in their local jet.

[@xsupremeyx9923]

​​@@The__Leo69I don't think so Tejas is a good option, since the Carrier itself is mediocre at best, giving it also mediocre aircrafts would really make it more of a liability than an asset. Remember the carrier doesn't have a catapult and is pretty small too in standards vs what actually should've been considering India has been operating carriers since 1960s, too bad the governments since then kept sleeping until now. The chinese only started on carriers 10 years ago and currently they've left India far behind in the race even though their carriers suck as well, We had the experience in carrier warfare and still they're gaining pace on us. We should move ahead of freebies and instead invest way more infrastructure and manufacturing, until we start churning out infrastructure like a big mass production factory, india isn't gonna grow at all, Chinese did exactly that since they're in a disguised Dictatorship under Communism, why we're still fixated at mere communal politics and freebies which would've been better invested even on shipbuilding which would've increased exports and strengthened naval defence sector for example. Plus the people themselves here are very greedy, the moment these freebies are removed they'll go on to protests, honestly a dictatorship would serve these people better since they all are greedy dickheads and would eat out of someone else until they die instead of doing work themselves.

[@nishitsanyal7519]

It was between Rafale Naval version and FA 18 Super Hornet, I think they chose the Rafale.

[@asdfasdffdcd]

India should buy China's 001 and 002 so that together with Vikrant, will be 3 rotational power.

[@vorrdegard2176]

😂 sure if they are willing to sell

[@eladphawa7301]

Blah blah blah, don't you know that India is going indigenious😅

[@vorrdegard2176]

@@eladphawa7301 you didn't get the joke

[@eladphawa7301]

@@vorrdegard2176 nope bro can you elaborate😂

[@frankfleming1103]

@@eladphawa7301 All imported parts, and Italy design, Italy only can design mini AC, this is why India Ac is mini version. that is India type indigenious😅

[@Tzar-Athi]

We need to start rolling out more of these at Indegeneous rates to supply to strategic partners like the Phillipines and Other parts of South and Southeast Asia to fund our arsenal and secure the Indian Ocean

[@koolakhin]

Shout out to Cochin Shipyard!!!

[@honfmeilingfleet957]

Indian Military keep rising and rising and sure Indian Military can be strong enough against all Countries Military

[@abymathew295]

Yeahhh, along with the entire Pakistan in the next 30 minutes...Dude, to get a carrier, you have to breach at least 5 layers of Air defence systems...that's not an easy task for a country like Pakistan.

[@lalithajanghamaiha4446]

So don't mess with India now onwards .

[@lalithajanghamaiha4446]

Just in a friendly manner

[@Austin-cx2xe]

There’s a reason India had to add so many weapons to this carrier. It has terrible radars. It takes forever to launch and land an aircraft. US carriers can launch 30+ jets in less than 45 minutes. It would take 45 minutes just for the Vikrant to launch a single jet. Plus all of the weapons and aircraft are from other countries. What a joke

[@anupamc3510]

@@Austin-cx2xe you sound like a jobless online troll

[@_Mohit_Joshi]

@@Austin-cx2xe "joke"? Say that to almost all NATO allies, who are solely dependent on the US. Even economically mighty Japan, South Korea, etc rely on US. Atleast Bharat (India) has indigenous manufacturing capabilities. And BTW, INS Vikrant carries indigenous Tejas aircraft too.

[@Kevin-fq3zh]

@@_Mohit_Joshiyour carrier is just a christmas tree of foreign tech & components. your Tejas is useless. you need Rafales but your government is still haggling over the price. real joke haha

[@nagaxchilly5995]

I can smell some burning in the comment section

[@jerryshanelee4219]

Who's Waiting ins Vishal?

[@ranjithm1648]

18 years it's to long to make a indigenous carrier...this should be 5 years maximum... India need 4 more aircraft carriers..to back up... enemy's are increasing no one can trust need to self sufficient..

[@marcd5196]

18 years? 2019 to 2022 isnt "18 years".

[@Dr.Kay_R]

​​@@marcd5196designing started in 2005. But cus it was the first time india has build anything by themselves, they had to figure out everything from scratch. Next one will take 5 years.

[@rensgt7740]

The latest super carrier of USA "USS Gerald R Ford" took 10 to 12 year to build. So, 18 year is not that long for a first timer.

[@marcd5196]

@@Dr.Kay_R i know designing started in 2005, but thats not part of the construction period. By the logic, planning started in 1999.

[@cjjk9142]

What’s the point of like 7 carriers if you have zero overseas interest and or have a zero global reach policy/interest

[@Emphasis213]

Everything is relative, the narrator should compare this to a US supercarrier. It would makenthis Vikrannt look like a toy. Also many of the conponents of the Vikrant sre sourced-not home made, butni guess you gotta start from somewhere.

[@ffpredator5214]

😂😂India next super power💪💪 America next super poor😂😂next migrants refugee camps😂😂

[@YourFuhrer1933]

Still it is a huge achievement for us, we were so weak not a long time ago, so we are happy to achieve even this. Yes usa supercarriers are of different breed, we can not compare with them atleast for now.

[@siddharthb2545]

It's indigenously built . Next one will compete with the best . As far as rankings go indian military is ranked number fourth in the world . As india grows economically so will its military .

[@YourFuhrer1933]

@@siddharthb2545 next one is ins Vishal which will have a displacement of around 70000 tonnes will still be not comparable to US Navy's supercarriers which have displacements of over 100000 tonnes, but it is comparable to Chinese carrier.

[@atharwamalawade259]

​@@YourFuhrer1933 The US Navy has had experience building carriers since the 1940s. We're just getting started. It'll take time, but with help we'll catch up in the next 2 decades.

[@allgood6760]

Awesome 👍

[@edisonone]

45,000 tons with an island the size of a cruise ship?

[@JosephTin]

Keep boasting and blowing hot air. What aircrafts are deployed on board the new ship?

[@chadj1797]

Aww Chyna man seems angry, doesn't he? How does that make you feel eh

[@JosephTin]

@@chadj1797, hi simpleton, obviously you have no clue how the world works. Keep dreaming.

[@ParaSF-im8kn]

@@bhaskarneogi6706not Rafales. 1 Squadron of Mig29K( 21 fighters). Also no need to reply to bat soup drinkers.

[@oreo5835]

@@chadj1797No just a British waiting for King's funeral

[@capteagle9]

​@@ParaSF-im8knbruh rafales would be deployed onboard..the naval varient

[@derekng958]

INS Vikrant is powerful than all USA carrier. !

[@krish2.ogamerz248]

Nah it's not stronger than usa aircraft carriers

[@PARKSHPONU-zh1tf]

🇮🇳👍🙏🙏🙏❤️

[@anujoshi_0029]

INS VIKRANT looks like RF ADMIRAL KUEZNETSOV

[@amos325]

Don’t say your aircraft carrier is powerful if you don’t have EMALS

[@chinazieswillstartww3253]

First go and check how many countries in the world have their own indigenous aircraft carriers then come back kid

[@amos325]

@@chinazieswillstartww3253 lol first look at how many foreign technologies used I your boat before talking. Then my country happens to be one of the countries can indigenously build aircraft carriers with EMALS

[@chinazieswillstartww3253]

@@amos325 What is your country? Even American ships have many foreign components kid

[@amos325]

@@chinazieswillstartww3253 fine India is number 1, so leave me alone now

[@chinazieswillstartww3253]

@@amos325 You are ashamed to even name your country. I wonder which country is that

[@RalphDavis-qk2xy]

Is this old Soviet technology?

[@racecar15]

Nope... digital technology... didn't u hear the nerater..

[@downtomars6268]

Well Russia made extensive repairs to the Indian carrier.

[@BipinBabu101]

Only racists who looted India for 200 years think so.

[@AmitKumar-xt9ms]

Ekplane ekship ek power ek ambulance ek caar ek bus 4:52 ek bike ek bycycle ek hand set ek watch ek pen yha se vha se

[@xinyujiang8634]

Domestic refers to buying and assembling in India abroad

[@Sonuverma-zp3nw]

Proud to be Indian

[@desionmynthlu1273]

The only problem is that everything is very slow😢😢😢😢

[@_kartik_chauhan]

The speed is increasing day by day

[@knightking69]

@@Sigma_Kitten He is talking about the time it takes to build a ship, not its cruising speed

[@varun2250]

​@@Sigma_KittenHe's talking about DPSU work culture

[@vatsalpatel9628]

You're joking right? Just recently MDL finished the shipbuilding 4 months ahead of the schedule, they're getting fast.

[@varun2250]

@@vatsalpatel9628 Then why are they delaying Scorpene Submarine construction so much?

[@Fjdhfyhk]

Kochi shipyard 💪

[@niuchajianfa6222]

sure

[@Fjdhfyhk]

Nice to see foreigners crying in the comments 😹

[@toothlessseer3153]

1 - No catapult (has a ski jump that cheap and technologically backward carriers use) 2 - No decent aircraft for the carrier (MIG-29s are literally one of the worst aircraft in the world) 3 - Not nuclear powered 4 - Zero supporting infrastructure around it (supply tankers, support ships) 5 - India has been operating aircraft carriers since the 1960s (I remember reading about the original Vikrant being inducted into the navy 52 years ago) 6 - Meanwhile China just started operating aircraft carriers 10 years ago and has left India waaaaaaaaaaaaay behind. *Stop patting yourselves on the back, roll up your sleeves and actually compete with China!*

[@user-ek6dg2yh1h]

Hey jack if India had money like China it military would be far ahead.they have the necessary mean to move ahead.mr ccp.

[@martinluther4720]

imagine thinking India doesnt have supply tankers & support ships....... and India is using rafale jets for this aircraft. Not Mig 29s

[@toothlessseer3153]

@@martinluther4720 *as of today NOT ONE RAFALE M JET HAS BEEN DELIVERED* 😜

[@toothlessseer3153]

@@user-ek6dg2yh1h Without money, stick to bayail-gadis 😆😆

[@Xhydraulics]

Well ,it has escort ships​@@toothlessseer3153

[@deepakmehta5156]

👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

[@user-kq4hf8se5b]

That highly advanced diesel engine.

[@maemilev]

Now Arjun can bollywood dance on it

[@Neverbelieveonrussia]

use burnol bro

[@tda7294]

I will take it as a joke 👍👍.

[@_kartik_chauhan]

It has 5-6 big movie industries and around 20 regional movie Industries Bollywood is only 1 of them

[@udayviruppal3730]

Who is arjun

[@jojored7966]

Indians are used to being self-absorbed, so it’s good to let them fall asleep like this. Just sit back and watch the jokes! Indians are world-class joke creators! ! It must have been another fun to watch the boat that day!