Indian Defence Updates : Su-57 Full ToT Offer,Nigeria Rejects LCH,MQ-9 Base in UP,IAF 5 LRSAM Order

Top 10 Latest Indian Defence News Headlines on today's "Indian Defence Updates" episode 5-11-2023 are as follows :
🔴 Fast Headlines :
1. Need to go beyond traditional learning environments : IAF Chief
2. India Malaysia conclude joint military exercise Harimau Shakti 2023
3. BSF brings down Pakistani drone in Punjab
4. Rashtriya Raksha University hands over Rooster Drones to Army
5. Australian & Indian P-8 air crews worked side by side on joint maritime surveillance.
🔴 Detailed Updates :
6. Russia offers India new format for developments of defence systems : Su-57 gets KH-101 & KH-102
7. Sweden's Saab bags India's first 100% FDI in defence project
8. Keeping Indian Offer on Backburner, Nigeria Acquires T-129 from Turkey
9. UP & Haryana to get MQ-9B Bases in India
10. S-400 delivery to be completed in next one year : IAF Chief
🔴 Connect with #IndianDefenceUpdates :
⚪Instagram ► defencealerts
⚪Facebook ► defencealerts
⚪Twitter ► defencealerts
About : Indian Defence Updates is India's Top English Defence Channel. Indian Defence Updates brings you the latest daily updates related to Indian defence and latest technology news of Indian Army, Indian Air force, Indian Navy.
indian defence news,indian defence news headlines,indian defence news latest, indian defence latest news, defence updates latest,defence updates india,indian defence updates latest,indian defence updates 2023,defence updates 2023,indian defence updates india,indian defence update,indian defence updates

[@IndianDefenceUpdates]

What's Your Opinion : "Should India Consider S-500 / Su-57 if Full ToT is offered" ? ＬＩＫＥ | ＣＯＭＭＥＮＴ | ＳＨＡＲＥ | ＳＵＢＳＣＲＩＢE

[@KuchBhi-xs5oe]

Yes

[@subhamsekhar9908]

No, it might sound the best deal but it will come at a cost of ignoring our own AMCA.

[@AnirbanSarkar203]

100% Yes, best platform to replace the ageing Su-30MKI fleet

[@maheshshah7570]

No

[@prashantpatel7643]

Yes. India has been using such products and services. India can reverse engineer at will and make a better product than Russia. Su 57 is a very formidable fighter aircraft. India needs hundreds of fighter aircraft

[@rgzutshi]

India should try to absorb any and every technology that's incoming. and also invest in R&D to enhance the same.

[@man.69.]

yes......we will take the su57

[@wankmaster69]

su57 with 100% tot is really good option tbh

[@sureshks7459]

No use

[@wankmaster69]

@@sureshks7459 jese apne pass 5th 6th 7th generation jets bane rakhe hai

[@bensigl3766]

How so? The SU-57 barely qualifies as a 5th gen plane and was only designed for frontal stealth, relying ground-based AA to protect its rear while it runs back home.

[@bensigl3766]

@SomeGuy-to7vm not personally a big fan of CNN. You do know there are other ways to learn about things, right? I'm not saying anything groundbreaking. Or anything particularly bad; it has good frontal stealth and terrible rear stealth because that's what their doctrine called for. They have a plan to make up for that design choice, I'm just one of many who think it isn't a great idea at this point. India has the capability to build better, so my own layman's opinion is that they should stick with domestic development and use EW suites for the Tejas mk1a, mk2, and Rafale until things like AMCA are online.

[@santhoshkumar-pk3vf]

​@@bensigl3766amca prototype will be finished in 2035 if all goes as planned.

[@I_Am_Victor]

SU 57 is a game changer and so is S 500. India can get 38 SU 57 by 2025 if pushed forward and that too made in India. ☝️😊

[@ppen8359]

Ultimate fools. SU-57 is a game changer based on what? It cannot even cross battle front in Ukraine. And S-400s are destroyed by anti-radiation missiles in Crimea. Foolish Indians will buy any nonsense and always have inferior equipment. S-500 will be even easier to destroy. More powerful radar means easier destruction.

[@mr.mastermind4840]

Once the Izdeliye 30 engine is ready for production

[@benmaruthanal581]

Until the AMCA program completes, India should procure SU-57 it the best choice.

[@satmohabir7175]

It's impossible to get 38 SU 57 by 2025 assembled in India!

[@benmaruthanal581]

@@satmohabir7175 it is possible to produce 38 to 40 SU-57 in India Hindustan aeronautical facility can produce this fighter if Russia govt provides 100% technological transfer within a year or 2, 40 fighter can be produce.

[@erukaarivu6404]

Kudos to govt for allowing SAAB to make 100% investment

[@letmedie6134]

Su 57 with 4500 km range Kh1a missiles is looking just combination of beauty with beast.

[@user-rc9qn1bj5x]

proud to be indian .We do our own thing

[@user-ux2dv7jj1r]

Your videos are very informative

[@ramenmukherjee6781]

Jai Hind Jai Bharat🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳👍👍

[@krishanpathak4989]

We should really double our effort to develop our own jet engine of 110 and 130kn ton. Its desperately needed.

[@babudominickattappana2355]

INDIA must choose SU 57E .the 5th generation fighter after upgrading stealth capability and minimising sound UNDER full TOT

[@ashrithrao06]

I have read few reports of Su-57. I concluded that Su-57 is a poorly developed aircraft.

[@ashrithrao06]

@@SomeGuy-to7vm What report are you talking about? Idk The report I was talking about is a RCS simulation done between F-35, J-20 and Su-57. The Simulation Concluded that RCS OF: F-35 > J-20 >> Su-57 Su-57 was a joint program between India and Russia. After pumping so much money into the aircraft program, India had exited citing ToT problems with Russia and Non-Satisfaction of Indian Air Force regarding the capabilities of Su-57. Su-57 is a poorly developed aircraft, Russia has technical capabilities but no money. Even Russian Air Force is not inducting Su-57 due to few reasons maybe maintenance problem/high cost/ Technical Capabilities or something else. Rather going for updated platforms of Pervious fighter jets like MiG-35 which is an update of MiG-29 and other Sukhoi Aircrafts. I don’t use any media reports especially western in terms of defence.

[@beevlogger1826]

@@ashrithrao06 Su 57 are made to protect russian airspace under the cover of s400-s500 and other ad systems they very well know they cant go on full out war with the US(7 days to rhine strat earlier(soviet era)) so it have less rcs and more manuevarability and load carrying capacity it does not need stealth since ground radars will get f22s and 35s earlier so su57s can contact. The problems with the su57s are -Its Engine still the same old al41 new one was not ready or was not prooven -its radar though aesa russias experience was poor so many claim not that great one -its cost of flying and production costs are high russia cant afford it -Russia already had su35s and su30s which does the same job here under ad cover(stealth is downplayed in this environment) The solutions -Get export order there by money to develop the fighter and bring down the cost If we do a deal we can bypass sanctions by buying oil at higher prices thereby paying for the tech(10% more) su 57 are not poorly developed fighter iaf went back bcz they were not promised the future tech or new engine

[@mr.mastermind4840]

​@@ashrithrao06Every Russian equipment is poorly designed as per CNN. CNN is also claiming that the Russians have suffered serious losses when UKRAINE launched its counter offense with Western equipment and Western support. Aside from the speculations, I believe that if the foreign weapons were as good as they were hyped and Russian weapons were as poor as it is hyped then the outcome of Ukraine's counter offence would have been successful. So the only way I think to measure it is in terms of the land that Ukraine was able to capture back and we all can see how it worked.

[@XOXO-if8yo]

​@@ashrithrao06 lmao

[@arshalsebastiansaiza4676]

Can't wait to see Su-75

[@benmaruthanal581]

If India procures SU-57 no other countries would attack on border or inside the country. If procure the fighter jet it can be use as second fighter until the project AMCA is completed. Manly to fight back china, India should procure this fighter, and also it can be build in India as the Russian officials says like we build SU-30MKI.

[@GhoststoriesIND]

Informative video

[@amarx_]

If the current research and development of weapons are completed on time India will become self sufficient in many areas in terms of defence technology and weapons

[@GareebInsaan2020]

Jai Hind Vande Mataram 🧡 🤍 💚

[@rakesh9918]

India should increase Research and Development in Defense sector to face China and Pakistan together in a war

[@rakeshkumarsingh2905]

Nice

[@user-gg9mj8ky9t]

NICE 👍

[@amitkumarsingh4833]

Nice video

[@India20504]

🇮🇳🧡

[@dhanushrendran911]

❤🇮🇳❤

[@172bomkarpednekar2]

Bharat Mata ki Jai Jai Hind 🇮🇳

[@Soldiersmart]

First

[@coolkal7590]

I didn't think they could fit in the Kh-101 into Su-57 IWB but they did 😍 Hybrid propulsion Kaliber would be even better (both make that terminal dive but that Kaliber version hits at Brahmos speed) An IWB version of Kinzhal already tested Air launched Zircon will be easier 👍✌

[@coolkal7590]

​​​@@SomeGuy-to7vmF-35 does it with EO-IR in DAS But eventually I think with AESA the distributed radar approach better as will also act as jamming frequency transmittors even comm apertures in future And photonics will converge the two approaches Russia already ahead in the fields The blokes just don't have enough money Which is where our real opportunity lies in resource pooling & collaboration

[@rakeshkumarsingh2905]

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@sanjeevverma7680]

ਜੈ ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਰਾਮ

[@nagarajakm6374]

Bharath maata ki jai ❤🙏

[@thathvamsaswatham8243]

With india's own AtoA ,Astra and brahmoseNG,Rudram Anti Radiation missles, SU30 cannot match j20 j31 and hence Untill AMCA ready, we may go SU57 and we use Syealth coatings.Together S500 and SU57 even very Late, needed very much. Also Navel version modificstion usefull.

[@abhinayrangari9693]

4000km😮

[@maheshshah7570]

Better to go for indigenous for all types of weapons fighter, missiles

[@senbagamuthurahul-2746]

They could have stationed one in ANC

[@mohitjangra8582]

Bharat Mata ki jai ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@Gr8putin]

India should grab it. Izdelliye 30 is good engine

[@coolkal7590]

Finally they have matched the Western engines 😊 But don't think they'll go as far as full ToT for the Izd-30

[@ashrithrao06]

Russia became too late in Su-57 tot with India. IAF was not satisfied with the aircraft. I read reports of simulations of RCS of 5th Gen Aircrafts, it was concluded that F-35 has much better RCS than anyone else but it was shocking that China’s J-20 has way better RCS than Russian Su-57. Su-57 is a poorly developed with not so many great technologies. That’s the reason IAF rejected. Even Russian Air Force is not willing to induct Su-57 rather going for MiG-35 and other 4.5 Gen Aircrafts. It’s better to get advanced 4.5 Gen aircraft than Su-57. If our country REALLY DEMANDS for S-500 then we should go for it.

[@satyajitmondal8909]

Instead of SU57 India should ask Russia for Jet Engine Technology.

[@coolkal7590]

Mig-35 is for nos. Cheapest & pretty decent match for NATO 4/4.5 th gen Russia can't afford too many Su-57s

[@surojeetchatterji9966]

​@@satyajitmondal8909 Russian engine is not reliable. Russia doesn't have top notch mettulergy research capability.

[@surojeetchatterji9966]

​@@SomeGuy-to7vm We don't need unreliable Russian engines with black smoke.

[@cauveryrajm8962]

Bharath should get S 500 and su57 should be made in India with the weapons that Russia offering, this might be useful for amca project because su 57 is 5gen fighter jet and India scientists have worked in it for few years in the early stages

[@saras102]

Can't see any jets india purchasing and even aif has stated that the Mrfa will be the last imports . Seems we might go for other products which can be made and it is a good model if we make them in india.

[@sanjayrawat4866]

No if the production in joint venture the yes otherwise no Bharat will make within ten years ❤❤❤❤❤ 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 जय हिंद जय भारत❤❤❤❤❤🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

[@starbeard5538]

India need to take this offer!! 5th gen aircraft.

[@defenceanalyzer]

Tension not AMCA And LRSAM is coming............but it's take time.

[@PrimoPete]

Of course the LCH got rejected. It doesn't have an EW suite and a few other things.

[@SmithyIsNaughty]

Russia first eats (and digests) 3 billion dollars in aircraft deal with India, disappoints us and now is offering Su-57, dood ka jala chach bhi phook phook ke peeta hai.

[@SmithyIsNaughty]

@@SomeGuy-to7vm we initially invested 3 billion and there was no progress in deal, therefore we pulled out. we did invest and logically we should get that money back but we basically dumped the money instead of asking for it.

[@samindherreddy]

Su57 with 80% tech transfer will be game changer for us

[@ppen8359]

Where do you fools get those ideas from? What has SU-57 ever done for you to think it is even an average aircraft? If it crosses battle lines in Ukraine, it will get shot down.

[@user-sf3dj9is8h]

HAL Prachand is an excellent gunship but it lacks weapons and ammunition suitable for it.

[@thegreatestofalltime777]

So what are they doing over my house? sometimes flying slow, fast, high, low, hitting full afterburner. isn't this a part of the training? 😮

[@rakeshdewesar]

Get su-57 with full tot and s500.

[@user-co5vh9zs4c]

The reason everyone is offering India technology is because they know that if India continues investing in indegenization like we have been doing recently then they will completely lose a massive defense market. We shouldn't fall for make in India deals and instead develop weapons that are fully Indian.

[@thendino1]

You can still get the tech and absorb into the domestic industry which was not being done properly before Modi. The previous govts were completely corrupt or had no clue what was going on...

[@user-co5vh9zs4c]

@@SomeGuy-to7vmBrahmos development started in 1995. India got technology for Brahmos in 2004 but till date we have not managed to make one indegenous production ready cruise missile. Asking technology means making India dependent on their technology because we will have to pay a large amount of money for it, money we will have to take from indegenous projects. Tech transfer doesn't built you testing facilities and development experience, it is the difference between Automobile factory foreman and an Automobile designer developer.

[@user-co5vh9zs4c]

@@thendino1 Brahmos development started in 1995. India got technology for Brahmos in 2004 but till date we have not managed to make one indegenous production ready cruise missile. Its not simply a question of Modi. Modi is not a magician. Ultimately India simply doesn't have the money to buy foreign technology and fund indegenous development simultaneously. Tech transfer doesn't built you testing facilities and development experience, it is the difference between Automobile factory foreman and an Automobile designer developer.

[@user-co5vh9zs4c]

@@SomeGuy-to7vm I am sorry but you are just plain wrong. Brahmos still uses Russian propulsion. Also it is still 50% Russian company, in otherwords half the price is higher because we have to pay them. If it was our missile then we would have been able to make 1500Km range variants by now which we can't because Russia has not given us those engines.

[@user-co5vh9zs4c]

@@Flying-Tiger It has nothing to do with GTRE being bad... GTRE doesn't even get 1/10th the funding or resources that US or Russia or China or France or UK spend on their engine development programs and they barring China have decades of experience and all necessary testing facilities in addition to greater funding. China spends almost as much as US now but still has inferior tech than Russia.

[@UMS9695]

The Russian offer of SU-57, SU-75 with TOT and KH-101 and KH-102 missiles is a massive game changer for India!! The sale of S-500 is a very welcome offer! If Bharat goes for S-500, the US will surely panic and will try to placate India with some candy counteroffers. India can then show its huge middle finger to the US and say, thanks, but no thanks! This is how India can and must play hardball with the US!! Should India go ahead with the purchase of S-500, the US is in no position to sanction India and it's a double whammy for it. Finally, for those who have written off India-Russia friendship, shame on them!!

[@mr.mastermind4840]

​@@Flying-TigerIt is still not too late, we will evaluate and choose from all the options available to us. The Western corner will be under pressure from this offer. We should evaluate and see what counter offers we can get from our Western counterparts.

[@mr.mastermind4840]

@@SomeGuy-to7vm If Su 57 is offered in MRFA and that too after it has been fine tuned and with the AL 51F1(Izdeliye 30) engine. This could be a viable option, as for medium weight aircraft operations, we will have some Rafale and Tejas MK2 in good numbers. I don't know how costly the maintenance is going to be if we can fully maintain it in India

[@mr.mastermind4840]

@@Flying-Tiger I am not sure if that's how backdoor purchases work, China doesn't have access to themselves in terms of quality chips, they are banned as well from the western market. Russia will outsource it from different suppliers.

[@mr.mastermind4840]

@@SomeGuy-to7vm It was also for medium jet fighter aircrafts but F15 and SU 35 offer changed that

[@mr.mastermind4840]

@@Flying-Tiger This should have been done a long time ago. We are not only late, we are not making progress in manufacturing chips

[@ajaybhaskar5052]

India should go for su57 as they are offering 100% TOT. No country will give such an offer.

[@ajaybhaskar5052]

​@@SomeGuy-to7vmiaf slower than tortoise in taking decision.

[@coolkal7590]

​@@SomeGuy-to7vmWho knows they might have been waiting for this offer ;) Nothing else explains the inordinate delay

[@aliflaila905]

JaiHaadi will hug JaiHaadi

[@rajul6248]

India stock large no of jpads system for parasute

[@HarishHari-ov5tw]

This present govt is america obsessed. Russia's su57 is good deal.

[@santhoshkumar-pk3vf]

We are planning to make our own AMCA.

[@bhavishyadeep5994]

Bharat should not buy US weapons as much as possible .

[@vikrammahajan8515]

Jai Maa Bharti Jai Shri Ram.

[@Wanheda2]

Customers are turning away from our aviation defence. Starting from Tejas which failed to attract foreign buyers.

[@thathvamsaswatham8243]

India defintely need min 3 squadrans SU57 s to face two front war and hence the threat from df21 and Longrange bomber H6 from china and J20 and j31.Su75 not required.

[@anilkumarrali303]

India must get su57 is better than Rafael, 5th generation characteristics of su57 over Rafael

[@danishkfd]

S-500 is the only useful thing to buy. Su-57 is pretty poor compared to its counterparts and we are too in AMCA to go for su-57 now. Su-75 is decades away.

[@rakesharamaiah2737]

SU 75 decade, check again they already completed now they are making proto , in 2 years they will induct this jet, Russia is only country, they will finish project very quickly, adopted, They will upgrade later

[@Ezzkill44]

@@SomeGuy-to7vm nah f22

[@danishkfd]

@@rakesharamaiah2737 reminder about su-57. Russia claims it's stealthy, but has rivets visible all over it with that abomination of a size. It's first flight was in 2010. But the first fighters were inducted in 2020. That's a decade late. They are already having struggles to produce enough spares to repair their own airforce. How do you think with this many issues su-75 will be in service? It's meant to be an export stealth aircraft while su-57 is meant to be the primary one. If su-57 isn't even that stealthy, how will su-75 be one?

[@danishkfd]

@@SomeGuy-to7vm what are you gonna so with that 'super manuaverablity'? Go and dog fight the enemy? Good luck. Oh wait you can't see no one on radar. They are more stealthy than you. Wait a second! I am not stealthy enough! My huge size and rivets which are clearly visible together with that wide engine ducts compromised my stealth! An AMRAAM is coming towards me! Russians are still miles away with their aircraft bro. F35 is the production model. Most of the flaws are easily curable. None of them are structural flaws. Just some software updates are enough to correct them. Only major issue is sustained supersonic flight. That too isn't an issue if you are meant to in BVR.

[@danishkfd]

@@SomeGuy-to7vm super manuaverablity is useless tho unless you are in dogfight

[@vishalrajyaguru2597]

If that news is true then India must go ahead with the offer of procuring SU 57. No country is as reliable as Russia. We can’t win the war with small quantity of costly western weapons where The weapons itself can act as spies for the originating company and country. If weapons like SU 57 with India specific enhancements along with KH missiles and S500 in Indian arsenals, no country would even dare to Think about war with India. Not even in alliance. but these weapons should be procured secretly and covertly to avoid displeasure of the US and other friendly countries.

[@satmohabir7175]

Secretly? No, you cannot. However, it can be purchased under different scenarios - to fill a specific need that no other can fill at a very competitive price, for example. But I don't support any purchase of any country's military offering except under dire straights.

[@KuchBhi-xs5oe]

We should take this offer by Russia even if its not Atmanirbhar it is crucial now

[@yashasvisingh6694]

​@@SomeGuy-to7vmtaking TOT doesn't makes it aatmnirbhar

[@wankmaster69]

@@yashasvisingh6694 it's support Make in India.

[@satmohabir7175]

It is not surprising that Nigeria did not purchase the Prachand. The reason may be because the geography of Nigeria includes the tallest mountain which is only 2400 meters whereas the Prachand is a light weight helicopter designed for the elevation of the Himalayas. The ten highest mountains are all above 7460 m topping off at nearly 8,600 meters. Good as the Prachand is, its best performance is for the high elevation of the Himalayas. It is not well targeted for the lower elevation in Nigeria. It is my guess.

[@pisquared1827]

The specifications for the two are very similar except that Prachand has vastly better high altitude performance (which Nigeria doesn't need). The T129 (Turkish built up-engined Westland Agusta Mangusta) was about 3 times the price, so discounting corruption (which is common in Nigeria) the probable reason for non-selection of Prachand is Nigeria's need for quick delivery (HAL has 157 orders for the IAF before it can start on export orders and some of the advanced anti-tank missiles and avionics being fitted are still at final testing stage), and with the developments in Niger, Nigeria needs the attack helicopters right now.

[@rakadus]

​@@pisquared1827Are Nigerian requirements to meet counter insurgency requirements?

[@pisquared1827]

@@rakadus Yes, and that is what they think might happen in Niger.

[@satmohabir7175]

@@pisquared1827 Thank you for a better perspective. I wonder if HAL can improve the throughput of the line so some export orders can be catered for if needed while still addressing its IAF committment.

[@balventray]

Stick to local design less interference from foreign sources and develop capabilities.

[@computerworldgaming6615]

Amca Frist ......57 is trap

[@Ulatimber]

We should start lobbying to sell like turkey sells 50 million dollars helicopter which stands nowhere close to 36 million dollars apaches

[@JayKumar-yw7uj]

Humko lene chahiye 114 jet me su57 aur engine ismein France ya American laga dena chahiye fir yeh World ka sab se advance hoga ,

[@sanayamishra75]

Definitely the Turkish heli is more superior

[@RohitGupta-pw7qp]

Su57 + rafale = good option

[@user-sg2uk4zc7b]

Why buy reaper when Indian IIT engineers can make better than it at much cheaper price.

[@satmohabir7175]

What is that product you're promoting? Products have to be ready for use, not on the drawing board.

[@athimuthu3690]

Jai Hind Jai Modiji 🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@user-tq9cw7zh4x]

Drdo performance is very disappointed

[@MrRight-fu1gf]

True that countries like battle proven weapons. India really should start using it’s indigenous weapons against Pakistan in the next battle. Using Russian weapons while trying to sell your own won’t work. Save Russian weapons for advanced fighting. Why does everyone want to buy Turkish drone because it was battle proven. India does this promise countries will come begging! Edited not India Bharat!

[@techeves6024]

​​@@SomeGuy-to7vmu mean there drones right

[@sidharthjain7823]

Took training and get away

[@coolkal7590]

DIRCM MUST now for helis to survive This is another thing we can get from Russia if incapable of making a compact one on our own Su-57 the only fighter aircraft with a DIRCM Enough power for a laser pod with new engine This is so much better IAF must be an idiot not to see it 😝

[@vijaypatil-mv6ke]

ToT I mean seriously it's a joke 😂 before PM Modi visiting US there was the same news regarding jet engine technology that's not happening, then he visited France and the same news was spread but that's also not happening. And now this. I don't think anyone would be willing to do a full ToT unless we place a bulk order of at least 300 fighter jets which would be a 50-100 billion dollars deal. Which I don't think any government will be able to do cause they are too afraid of corruption scandals which they do basically. Chinese pearls theory is not a theory anymore there bases are set in Srilanka and now we will be thrown out of Maldives and apparently Bangladesh is also joining China soon after the regime change.

[@WahKuchhbhi]

Padeyeter drone bharat ko nahi lena chahiye made in india drone lena chahiye 🙏

[@niravjoshi5494]

Russian Khataraa nahi chahiye

[@valmiki527]

Russions A&A have been failed in Ukrainian war, first review all imports from Russia 😊😊😊

[@WhoAmI00307]

Russia tech transfer is joke . Just like su30 and T90 tech transfer.

[@vinayaksharma8101]

Nigeria always favours Muslim countries.

[@santhoshkrish]

India have to rethink it's Russian weapons, recent Ukrainian war exposed Russian products quality. India was part of 5th Generation aircraft and India was forced to pullout due to Russian kept secret of the project. Even the used aircraft carrier also have taken more time and 10,000 crores. Better India must focus on it's own weapons.

[@wankmaster69]

Keep watching CNN.

[@danishkfd]

It's isn't weapons issue but the issue of modern military warfare and poor Russian leadership.

[@parthparth433]

Lol. Dont watch usa media.

[@KuchBhi-xs5oe]

If Russian weapons have failed why Ukraine is demanding more weapons?? Use this simple logic

[@danishkfd]

@@KuchBhi-xs5oe this is a senseless comment tho. With more weapons you can reduce losses.

[@deependrapratapsingh7649]

Su 57 is not a good option according to me, technically it is not 5th generation Jet. Avionics are inferior to modern Western jets, rcs and heat signature are awful. India should go for Western jets

[@8000jk]

Western jets like the French Rafale or European Eurofighter Typhoon. These are much better options than US aircraft being offered, that are almost obsolete and being replaced by the F-35 in US service. The US seems to only offer near obsolete or out of production/service systems for export to nations like India. It isn’t a coincidence that ToT and production for GE F414 engines and MQ-9B drones were offered as these systems are being phased out in US service by more advanced platforms.

[@Astroboy66]

We should Denied the Russian🇷🇺 offer of su57 because Russia just need our money when India pulled out of FGFA Project the program was almost freeze and the aircraft is not as capable as the counterparts like f35&f22 they don't have such technology like the Western countries we shouldn't waste our money we need to focus on AMCA🇮🇳 or joined the 6gen fighter program with France🇫🇷 or UK's🇬🇧 tempest pgm

[@Astroboy66]

they just want us to pour money so they can develop and they won't share Suffisticated Technology with us

[@Wander_Ventures]

The fact is that no right thinking military will buy expensive Indian defence systems because they are simply not good enough. We must admit that technologically, India is 10 years behind Turkey, 20 years behind China and 30 years behind the west

[@yogeshkharkwal4531]

No will buy indian LCH or tejas

[@totwallybaba]

If India really believes that Russia will be able to support the equipment they sell to India then by all means, buy that junk.

[@traveller7657]

@@SomeGuy-to7vm you are confused between Soviet Union and Russia.

[@mr.mastermind4840]

Yes yes, T90 is junk, T72's are junk. S400 is overhyped. What good weapons did we ever get from Russia, Brahmos, SU 30, MiG 29's? On the other hand we can see how effective is western weapons are in the Russia Ukraine war. How much of its land did Ukraine capture back from Russia again?

[@ranajitrout7543]

😂nigeria gaya....

[@sanchittandon9196]

Russian jets are shit...they are easily trackable and heat signature is really big.

[@azingo2313]

Nigeria ne India ko aukaat dikha dee 😂😂😂 Africa also doesn't want Indian system 😂😂😂😂

[@Squish_that_cat]

Atta mila?

[@deltaandD7516]

Waah....matlab Khud ki KACHII phati hui or dusro ke ke kapdo pe comment pass karenge..... Badhiya🙄😪

[@sumeetagrawal1888]

Congrats to Nigeria and well done for not trusting HAL...✌️

[@halo99218]

India should ask for ToT for su57 and s500 as russia cant produce em in time due to war, ofcourse this is after the black money/ commissions are dealt with by politicians. They seem to take a lot of time for that

[@vaibhavs.p3899]

Nigeria also rejected HAL Why foreign countries reject our products feeling sad for HAL 😬😞🥹 what's wrong with us

[@mohananawli2101]

Weapons have to be battle proven. Why American systems are held in awe because they are truly awesome in battles especially since Vietnam war. Don’t have to feel sad; just make the Indian forces use them extensively first

[@Cringemanic123-bm6bm]

@@mohananawli2101 you are partially wrong

[@Cringemanic123-bm6bm]

@@SomeGuy-to7vm Chinese weapons are not yet battle proven still they managed to sell those junks so it's not only based on battle proven and battle worthy certificate The marketing and poor design quality of indian manufacturers are the main issue

[@LUCIFER-qt1hn]

@@Cringemanic123-bm6bm countries like Pakistan buy Chinese junk just because they can't make their own fighters or weaponry and they feel so threatened by neighbouring countries

[@LUCIFER-qt1hn]

​@@Cringemanic123-bm6bmmarketing yes but not poor design quality

[@maheshshah7570]

Nice