Indian DNA History 🧬 🇮🇳

[@Ancestrallinguist]

Please watch my recent video where I explore the Indo Aryan migration of India in more depth kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y2KsmWiwmZmAeJosi=fG5hIoQ8Wf2cNHOy

[@jamesreed6634]

Westerners do not see Indians as one race. Stop stereotyping.

[@B-I-G-N-A-S-T-Y]

Austrian stock living in Africa sending blessings to my cousins in the subcontinent, you guys are beautiful, make the best damn food in the world and are too good at dancing.

[@AtheistNationalist]

Thanks bro 🫡

[@smitprmr]

Thank you kindly.

[@jmab721]

Thank you, please ignore the triggered comments by our right wing fanatics. They don't represent all subcontinent, they're a bunch of radicals with free internet & lot of unemployment.

[@lschandankumar3661]

Thank you brother

[@sumedhsukhdeve9117]

blessings to u too!

[@stynershiner1854]

Northeastern Indian here. I have high Sino-Tibetan DNA. I pass as South Chinese.

[@Ancestrallinguist]

Interesting 🤔

[@User.k3431]

I don't doubt it 👍

[@alani3992]

Because the NE did not have a big empire, the British forcefully added them to 'Indian Union'.

[@stynershiner1854]

@@alani3992 We literally had kingdoms, maybe not a big Empire. We had the Ahom Kingdom which remained independent for 600 years, free of the Mughals.

[@stynershiner1854]

@@alani3992 My profile picture is literally the coat of arms of the Ahom Kingdom.

[@simongee8928]

Same as Africa. Many folk see it as a country. It's actually a continent of 52 separate countries with many diverse peoples and traditions. 😊

[@starsian]

Not "many folk", only Americans.

[@Acrow0000]

Everyone eccept Africanists and Africans themesleves think that. 52 separate countries with hundred of thousand different languages and dialects and thousand different ethnicities and different cultures with various landscapes (Africa isn't only desert, savannahs and equatorical forests). Africa is huge and amazing, Occident doesn't know Africa.

[@sauravghosh7064]

One of the few video by foreigner(non indian) that focus on dna rather than language based Indo-Aryan nonsense push by european historians

[@TheRealGhebs]

I don't know what you're implying here. the Indo-European migrations from the steppes of e Ukraine and European Russia into India, for example is definitely not nonsense, and they've impacted Europe much more than India, since it's rare to see anyone below 20% Yamnaya in Europe.

[@donvtor24]

He is trying to hide linkage to european origin of upper caste Indians aka hindu Brahmins or ruling class elite indians as they are politically amassing power claiming their indigenousness and otherising everyone else. So Indo Aryan migration hurts their narration.😂

[@Moonlight77162]

@@donvtor24 naah dont just make a blatant lie lol

[@guddu6424]

Nonsense 😂😂😂 , Sanskrit, Hindi is belonging to indo Aryan language family.

[@benjaminperez1149]

Nonsense. There are quite a few of these DNA videos. Quit with the racial division please.

[@israelquintanilla8314]

There is no pure race, we all are little of everything . No pure race period ❤❤❤.

[@Travelwithzanii]

That’s literally not true. There’s many ethnic groups in the world who have never mixed with anything. So lets not speak for everyone

[@Tate525]

@@Travelwithzanii Might want to check his other videos, even Germans are mix of multiple populations.

[@Travelwithzanii]

@@Tate525 ouuu wow Germans. Like I said there are other ethnic groups that are not mixed with anything definitely most so different African tribes!

[@kazukawasaki97]

​@@TravelwithzaniiI think its they are all beautiful,pure or impure,makes world like a game, people of all types, the only thing Im proud of that I have not inherently achieved is being human and can think and experience, the past days studying phylogeny and genetic history of humans was fun

[@pete.T]

@@Travelwithzanii do you know your great, great, great Ancestor? Are the pure race or mixed. in modern world all gens already mixed

[@RodriguezRodrigo-dj3df]

I don't know why western people only consider dark skinned South Indians as Indians. Even though not all South Indians are dark. They think all Indians are dark, which is absolutely ridiculous.

[@waqaralikhan6601]

@paulbaltuta-in7wq Because South Indians are the original Indians. They first came here founding the Indus Valley Civilization.

[@amolsonawane1476]

​@@waqaralikhan6601If they built indus vally in North, can they be south indians you should call yourself indians not South Indians😂

[@thewhatorwhy]

What do you mean?

[@InvisibleBoy-cb3dr]

They were pushed back by us Brahmin ​@@amolsonawane1476

[@divineflu34567]

​@@amolsonawane1476their genetics are closer to indus people now they live in south hence south indians

[@anveshavyas450]

We've got a rich genepool whatsoever. India is like a mini world.. ❤

[@AndyFurze]

As someone who has romani ancestry on my mother's side i came back on a dna test as 7% indian continent,so this was very interesting and informative

[@andreamessiasgomes7118]

Romanis are not homogenous like they were initially when they left India now they are mixed and have different sub groups around the world.

[@gerardmichaelburnsjr.]

I may be misremembering this, but my understanding is there's a small group in Afghanistan that speaks a language so close to Romani that it is believed to be the original homeland. Similarly, Basque also seems to have had its origin there, or at least to I have a sister-language there.

[@AndyFurze]

@@gerardmichaelburnsjr.the romani their language is very similar to the language in what is north Western India for some reason and nobody hasn't come up with any correct idea why they really left.that they travelled through Persia.the middle east .north Africa. the balkans.greece.spain.eastern Europe. Western Europe eventually Britain and Ireland slowly intermixing as they travelled west.i look English but my mum's grandmother did look romani and my two uncle's black hair brown eyes and olive skins.in the mid victorian times romani were put under alot of pressure to settle down in one place for school and the census that is how my mum's romani side got settled.i looked it up on the 10 year census and they seemed to appear from nowhere in th 1860's

[@AndyFurze]

@@gerardmichaelburnsjr. the people who are called romani left North western India probably a 1000s years ago travelled through Persian.middle east.north Africa.the balkans.greece.easten Europe. Spain and then western Europe and then Britain and Ireland all the time slowly mixing with the local people along the way.i look English my mum's grandmother does look Romani black hair dark skin both my mum's brothers had black hair brown eyes and olive skin.ive only have to be out in the sun a little bit and o tan very brown

[@Womendeservebetter1]

No Romani don't get 7-8% south asian thry get half or more than half

[@We_Defeated_Mighty_Umayyads]

In Indian families, it's extremely common to have twi children with different skin tones, facial features and sometimes even hair colour. Our DNA is so diverse. One never knows which gene gets activatee in which baby.

[@rabbi50381]

We divide by borders but connected by our origin, culture and history.🇮🇳❤️🇵🇰❤️🇧🇩. Love from Bangladesh 🇧🇩❤️

[@jimbocho660]

I don't think so.

[@rabbi50381]

@@jimbocho660 I don't care what you think illiterate 👞

[@dipeshpal9428]

Lol! What culture?

[@rabbi50381]

@@dipeshpal9428 Bangladesh bengali and West Bengal Bengali. Pakistan Panjabi and Indian Panjabi ,Indian Kashmiri and Pakistani Kashmiri have same culture.Samaj Aya Kuch😑

[@MonochromaticBlues]

❤❤❤

[@RG-un2vl]

In fact, what the recent study from the Rakhigarhi skeleton DNA proved was that the Indus Saraswati civilization and the Iranian Huntergatherers shared an ancestral DNA going back more than 14,000 years. Which means that somewhere along the line people left or were forced to leave this area and migrate into Iran. Not surprisingly our ancient texts are full of the history of wars fought on the western tributaries of the Indus between different clans and how the ‘Iranian’ clans were pushed back out of present day India into Eastern Iran. The narrative in ancient Vedic texts really does match up with science today.

[@ohlawd3699]

The thumbnail says everything you need to know about this video. It says "Indian DNA History" with the Taj Mahal in the background and an A.I generated woman...but the Taj is actually from the Mughal culture, which isn't even Indian to begin with, lol. 🤣

[@Asteroid-t4b]

The Mughals are indian lol 😂😂😂

[@Asteroid-t4b]

The Geat Mughal Empire is Indian LOL 🤣🤣🤣

[@ohlawd3699]

​@@Asteroid-t4b They were a combination of Islamic, Turkic, and Persian culture, not Indian. If you want to see Indian culture, just go to an ancient Hindu temple, it looks completely alien the Taj, lol. 😆

[@Dheeraj-y4f]

they could begin with a hindu temple ,or hampi tbh

[@gouthamkrishnan6718]

​@@ohlawd3699Hindu temples are bigger and majestic

[@templersmount6976]

People always forget that there are so many different groups of people other than Indo-Aryans and Dravidians.

[@Based.Afghan]

4:44 There is no such thing as Pathan Indians. The word pathan is an indianized word for Pashtuns ( The dominant ethnic group of Afghanistan ) The Pashtuns/Afghans are eastern iranic. So it doesn’t make sense to call them indians. Thats like calling a spanish guy slavic.

[@celtofcanaanesurix2245]

it more like calling a basque guy spanish considering they are neighbors who are genetically similar

[@Based.Afghan]

@@celtofcanaanesurix2245 yep its like 2 different branches of indo european family. Our kinsfolk are other eastern iranic peoples not the indics.

[@hellotombat5616]

You must be ashamed for deleting original people of Afghanistan and India. There are indian pasthans remember Zakir Naik​@@Based.Afghan

[@hellotombat5616]

​@@celtofcanaanesurix2245there are pathans of Indian origin no ancestors from Afghanistan 😂

[@hellotombat5616]

And you guys don't relate to western Iran paternally instead north indians and European aka Aryans

[@valleyvlogsss]

aryan race really? Indians and Chinese people have proofs to exist way before BC.

[@shinobi-no-bueno]

Aryans are much older than 20th century Germany

[@valleyvlogsss]

@@shinobi-no-bueno this was a rumor spread by colonizers to instill white supremacy! There are no evidences found of such germans in India .. no ancestors spoke german neither Germans speak Indian, no archeological evidences found that prove this, there are more evidences found that Mahabharata occured 5000 years back yet Brirish claimed it was myth, also the term aryan race stinks of raciscm!

[@valleyvlogsss]

@@shinobi-no-bueno there are no evidences or traces found which prove it .. Indians love to be associated with white race no wonder they bought it!

[@ItsShahed17]

What are you talking about lol. The word Arayn came from Sanskrit - and taken by German nationalists to instill supremacy. All North Indian languages are called Indo-Aryan. It's nothing to do with Germans.

[@valleyvlogsss]

@@ItsShahed17 thank you.. what can we say abt dumb liberandus..they have been brainwashed v well!🙄

[@adarshdixit2918]

Some indians also have bmac ancestry...so some of us also have few amount of Anatolian farmers dna

[@whatapp4797]

The Hittites were Indo-Europeans in Turkey who worshipped the gods Indra, Mitra and Varuna. These gods are also in Hinduism.

[@AnnaJohnson-e7u]

@@whatapp4797 that’s right, they were all Indo tribes. I can’t understand how people cannot see the resemblance or make the connection. Indians, because of the geographical location has multitude of genetic mixtures so the appearance are very exotic but all in all these people all migrated from the Indus Valley

[@nsvdmuraliprasad2316]

I think Mittani not Hittites

[@AnnaJohnson-e7u]

@@nsvdmuraliprasad2316 the Hittites language is Indo European and derived from Sanskrit, look it up. Language gives a clear indication about ethnicities

[@vanisridhar5509]

Indra varuna are related to Dravidians i.e ancient Iranians

[@gkk3530]

​@@vanisridhar5509another imagination ? Indra / Varuna etc are names given to different powers in nature and it is from Vedic culture...

[@user-sy3dg1vk4x]

TRUTH ALWAYS TRIUMPHS

[@s.b626]

Yes. But not here where lies are told

[@VYBCTV]

This video is ok only. You should not jump to conclusions that IVC people spoke Tamil kind of statements without any proof. Please read my conclusions and statements which I made by referring Shinde report. I sent it to many videos including Ancestral Brew channel. Zagrosian Iranians who mixed with South Asian Hunter Gatherers(who were present all over south asia as hunter- gatherers) to form Indus Valley Civilization were hunters not farmers. Because the oldest IVC dna donot have Anatolian Farmer DNA or Mesopotamian Farmer DNA. They learned farming independently. So the language spoke by IVC people would have been Zagrosian/Proto Elamite mixed with some language spoken by South Asian hunter gatherers. Indo Aryans came after the decline of Indus Valley Civilization. They came from Southern Russia bordering Kazhaksthan. Before entering Afghanistan and Pakisthan. They learned agriculture from people of Bactria Margiana Archaeological Complex. That's why agricultural methods and crops used by Indo Aryans in Vedic period was identical to BMAC and not related to IVC. (Aryans cultivated barley, pulses and lentils in the banks of Saptha Sindhu, West Punjab. It was only after they mixed with IVC people they began to farm rice on Yamuna &Gangetic plains.) BMAC is a combination of Anatolian Farmers, Iranian Neolithic Farmers and Caucasus Hunters. Sanskrit, Avestan & Mittani are closely related languages than any other Indo European language. All these three languages are 3700 years old. Only relation we have with these European languages is because there is a common ancestor for all Indo European languages originated in West Eurasian Steppes that was not Sanskrit. It is yet to be foundout. Sanskrit originated in Afghanisthan. Later spread to Saptha Sindhu region, Ganga, Yamuna & Narmada. Finally came down to Southern Peninsula & Srilanka. Tamil originated in Tamilnadu from Proto Dravidian. It is 2800 year old language. IVC people spoke a language related to Proto Elamite. While South Asian Hunters spoke a Srilankan Vedda related or Australian Aboriginal language. Both languages are not spoken today in South Asia. Ok coming to genetics 70% Indians are mix of people from South Russian Steppes, Zagros,Iran& South Asia. North Indians have more Steppe ancestry because of various invasions and settlements from Turkmenstan, Persia etc. But their basic DNA is same as South Indian Upper & Middle castes. North Easterners and Ladakhi people have Sino Tibetan and Sino Burmese ancestors. But their culture and traditions are like any indigenous tribal culture found around our country. No matter where we come from we are Indians first. Jai Hind. Yours Gouri Sankar.K 👍🙏🇮🇳 www.palakkadwalks.blogspot.com

[@jspillai1869]

What is the story of Nairs of Kerala, genetic makeup as there are conflicting theories of their origin. My husband is from Kunisserri in Palakkad.

[@VYBCTV]

​​​​​​​​@@jspillai1869 Hello madam, there are lot of stories about Nairs like any other community based on phenotypes, facial features and folklore. Ahichatra (Rampur, U.P)Naga and Nepali Newar origins are the most popular stories about Nairs and Bunts circulating on the internet. Bunts, Nairs, Ambalavasis and Thiyyas are matrilineal castes. But none of the castes in UttarPradesh or Uttarakhand are matrilineal. Nagas were worshipped in many parts of India particularly forest tribes. We don't know what South Asian Hunters and Zagrosian people worshipped before Indo Aryan migration. 70% of what we call Hinduism was invented by Indo Aryan/Sanskrit speakers only. It is an umbrella term for many philosophical thoughts and spiritual beliefs.(Vedas, Upanishads, Dharmashastras, Puranas, Ithihasas, Agamas, Thantras etc.) It maybe fascinating to know that ancient people were more broadminded when it comes to marriage. People of Indian subcontinent is a great example. Sintastha Steppe DNA of Tamil Brahmins are highest among Southern Brahmins. Iyer - 13-20% Iyengar - 11-20% Tulu Brahmin - 15% Namboodiri - 12-16% Telugu Brahmin - 12-17% Kannada Brahmin - 11-18% Marathi Brahmins - 13-16% Konkani Brahmins - 13-17% Closest Genetic Distance Of Tamil Brahmins To Other Communities. (Iam a mix of Iyengar and Iyer.) 1. Telugu Brahmins 2. Malayali Nairs 3. Malayali Nasranis 4. Gujarati Baniyas 5. Punjabi Gujjars 6. Marathi Brahmins 7. Kannada Brahmins 8. Konkani Brahmins 9. Bengali Brahmins 10. UttarPradesh Kayasthas Steppe DNA of Nairs & Pathare Prabhus are highest among South Indian non Brahmins. Nairs on average have 10% steppe DNA. It reaches 16% maximum. Pathare Prabhus on average have 14% steppe DNA. It reaches 18% maximum. Steppe Blood Of Non Brahmin South Indians Who Have More Than 5% Are Given Below Nairs - 10-16% Bunts - 10-12% Ambalavasis - 8-14% Thiyyas - 9-11% Kodavas - 10-13% Ezhavas - 7-11% Reddy - 5 - 9% Balija - 6 - 9% Kamma - 7-11% Vellalar - 9-10% Mukkulathor - 8-12% Vokkaliga - 5- 10% Marathas - 8-12% Mahar - 8-10% Chandra Seniya Kayastha Prabhu - 10-16% Pathare Prabhus - 14 - 18% Among Non Hindus in South India Nasranis - 9-15% Konkani Christian - 15% Mappilas - 10% Rowther - 12% Marakkar - 9% Hyderabadi Muslim - 14% Nadar Christian - 8% As you all know Iam an online researcher and blogger specializing in philosophy, spirituality, history, linguistics, archaeology and genetics of south asia. I want to share a great news in this group us Tamil Brahmins have largest percentage of Sintastha blood (Poltkava + Abashevo) among South Indian Brahmins. Iyers - 13% - 20% Iyengar - 11% - 20% And we have the largest percentage of Indus Valley Civilization blood (Zagrosians From Iran/Proto Elamites + South Asian Hunter Gatherers) among all Brahmin groups in India. Iyers - 54% - 73% Iyengars - 49% - 68% Wow..😃👌🏻 Proud to have both in large amounts.🇮🇳 30% Tamil Brahmins have 13- 20 %Anatolian DNA received from BMAC. And 20% of us have 3 - 9% Sino Tibetan DNA too. Courtesy : South Asian Ancestry Reddit. Thankyou.

[@TingTong2568]

@@VYBCTV thanks for the info

[@VYBCTV]

@@TingTong2568 🙏😊

[@cameronpillay8050]

Nobody gonna read all yr bs 🤭 the ivc were tamil people, even the name ' Harappa ' is a Tamil word 😊 continue hatin' , it's amusing 🤡🔫

[@SisayBilelegne]

All human beings start or came from africa.however the rest countries do not want to say.because they may feel undeveloped,3rd world country.the truth is africa is the mother of all humanties.❤🎉

[@Acrow0000]

@@SisayBilelegne Remember that it is a theory, what if tomorrow they find older homo bones somewhere in America, Australia or Eurasia ?

[@indrajeet]

Lol, keep telling yourself that. Homo erectus evolved in Africa. Homo sapiens evolved in divergence

[@AnnaJohnson-e7u]

@@SisayBilelegne the truth is your theory has long been debunked. We did not all come from Africa. Why haven’t the negroes evolved if so . Such a bullshit theory

[@Mira-gu6we]

Africa is the origin.

[@Acrow0000]

@@Mira-gu6we Sea is the origin.

[@Dan-xx5jq]

Some will hate me for this but i believe that India is the cradle of mankind. India is where mankind first came about for reasons below which make total sense!! If you take one strand of South Indian straight hair and hold it over heat like a candle flame, it will curle up to look like our African brothers hair. Because a major part of Africa was on the equator where it was very hot, when ancient natives of India moved to Africa and the equator they eventually became darker skinned and their hair curled up because of the heat. The features also changed to deal with the extreme heat at the equator. The noses became wider so as to release the hot air faster. (The opposite is true of Europe, because of the extreme cold, the ancient native of India that moved there, had to retain body heat and so their noses were smaller so as not to lose that heat. So the migrations had to have started from India. Likewise when migrations from India reached Europe because of very little sun, they became light skinned. I also saw Albinos in the Dalit community and from a distance I thought they were Europeans. My mind was trying to figure out how these European tourists got left behind India and were so poor???. There is even a YT video of albinism in India and how those who have it look 100% European. I am not trying to be mean. In fact there is a girl in North India that was in the news, that has albinism and had blue eyes and blonde hair, and is mistaken as German, although she sounds 100% Indian. And she is very pretty, she does not look like someone that has Albinism. Sadly, she feels very lonely as she is viewed as a foreigner. And i believe Indians also went to Asia where again a mutation occurred with the eyes. I believe the cradle of mankind is India, as it makes complete and total sense that all different races that have come about in the world would come from the Indian people. It is very difficult to make sense of the Out of Africa theory and make that jump for Europeans to have come from Africa. It does not make sense. And for the Indian to come from Africa to have their hair straighten up....!! There would be no environmental factors to cause the hair to straighten up! i expect to get a lot of hate but like has happened before, the scientific community will figure out they got it all wrong when skeletons of ancient people are found in India and the world.

[@mohamedgoldstein5565]

Wow. Thats madrassa level science!

[@Just_forfun9140]

You have an interesting theory. Something happened in India, its like the tower of babel for languages, it could be the land of origin of many races or a precursor. They need to find many ancient skeletons from 5,10,15, 20K years ago from various regions of India, then we get a better picture. Its possible from India people migrated to various regions, after thousands of years the descendents migrated back to India? Who knows, so far no one knows 100% for sure.

[@Just_forfun9140]

I saw the YT video of a Albino woman in India, she looks like a northern European woman, not even from southern Europe. Indians who lose their pigment due to autoimmune condition, they also look European.

[@user-zq5dh6jr8n]

bro wasted 1200 words

[@globanxiety]

@@Just_forfun9140 The oldest skeletons found in india are from river narmada, dates back 140000 years. they're also the oldest pre-neolithic remains we have in the world. there's a video on YT about this recent discovery

[@rravisankar3355]

When there's never a race called Aryan in reality ever existed what's point of all these concoction!

[@ralph6417]

Lol

[@Gogetter-xc9ob]

Yk truth always tastes the worst 😂

[@gerardmichaelburnsjr.]

Cyrus the Great, in effect the founder of the Persian empire, said he and his people were Aryans. The word 'Iran', means 'Aryan' in Farsi. The Medes, who dominated what is now Iran before the Persians, said.the Persians were Invaders from the north, the Uman Mazda, or at least related to them, and could speak with each other without interpreters. So, Aryan may not qualify as a 'race', which is a hard to define term, but they were evidently a large culturally and linguistically defined people at one time.

[@truthreal3378]

For those of you who're making fun in the comment by typing " _lol_ or _Yk truth always tastes the_ ...." should realize that they also have those Arya-DNA in them. I suggest them to get their DNA Tested! Let's see if they themselves can digest what they consider as bitter truth or not! It's my open challenge to you all!

[@truthreal3378]

@@gerardmichaelburnsjr. Arya simply refers to noble, hardworking, civilized, and honest people. You can hear people from Russia, Africa, the Arab world, the USA, America, Europe, Japan, or China proudly stating that they come from a civilized and cultured society! That's precisely what Arya means in Sanskrit or Pali! It did not mean race! IDK about Iranian or Avestan as I haven't studied those languages! But I'm pretty sure they also meant this!

[@MsKforbes]

One thing that I see in this videos is an underlying desire to be closer to Europeans and whiteness, especially through the idea of being fairer than people from other regions. The British created this idea of an Indo- Aryan invasion as a way to justify colonialism. Their made up classification of race and the inclusion of Northern Indians under the banner of Caucasian was to help them lay connection and claim to India's civilizations. Becaus advances made by a non- European ancient South Asian society would've challenged the theory of white supremacy. In their minds, it's better to classify those non-Europeans as kind as almost white in theory, but never white in practice. Also, the majority of places on earth have gone through series of different migrations from various people groups some having great cultural or religious influence over others. It’s not a unique phenomenon.

[@eastbayflora]

@SpiritualSeeker-oq5pt Completely wrong. In ancient South India kingdoms, dark skin was always seen as superior. Don't include all of us in your dumb statement. Our South Indian mother goddesses are all dark for a reason too

[@eastbayflora]

@SpiritualSeeker-oq5pt are you retarded? Did you not read what I wrote? I said ancient South Indian kingdoms. That has no correlation to Vedas or caste system.

[@kwolf2145]

They wouldn't need that to justify colonialism and also how does that justify colonialism anyway. They ruled by force just like with other parts of the world they colonized.

[@Dheeraj-y4f]

@@eastbayflora even krishna,draupadi,arjun were all described as dark in mahabarat

[@Sam-t2i8t]

An year ago ' I was traveling through Italy and the native person was asking me something in their native language . He was shocked to know that I was from India. Many white friends of mine also assume me Italian or Spanish they were shocked to know me Indian .

[@bombayvega7021]

"Cast" is distorted labelled introduced by British. Its called "Varna" means Category". Earlier people were identified based on the work they do. "Scholars" were called Brahmin literally means "man with knowledge" "Kshatriya" were soldiers, same goes for Kshatriya which means "Worrier" "Vaishya" were businessman, Vaishya literally means "businessman" "Shudra" is a combination of "Shu" and "dra", Shu means beautiful, for example "Shu-shobhit" etc. Dra means "flow" sometimes called "dravya". so shudra means people who uses to make beautiful things. Tinkerers were called Shudra, people who used to make shoes, stonemason, making wooden utensils etc. It was British/Islamic rulers who twisted the meaning and destroyed the very fabric of Indian society.

[@whodis2792]

Exactly, thank you.

[@stinglp1198]

Why does the west never say that migration happened from asia to Europe ;

[@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg]

They do acknowledge the romanis !

[@stinglp1198]

@@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg I am talking about ancient migrations, thousands of years ago

[@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg]

@@stinglp1198 Any proof ?

[@stinglp1198]

@@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg correct, without proof the west did claim the Aryan invasion theory. If somebody with proof, claims that ancient migrations happened from southeast asia to Europe. They will not accept, because of their superiority complex.

[@PrabanshuBoruah]

Well migrations from asia to europe did happen and is well acknowledged , the biggest of which is the anatolian farmers migrating from modern asian turkey to europe(5k-10k years ago), haplogroup F migrating from india (60k years ago) , and even the steppe people werent just from europe, the proto indo Europeans lived in places like south russia(europe) AND kazakstan and central asia. the proto indo European werent just europeans

[@bloxpop5253]

I’m from Uttarakhand, India (a northern Himalayan state), and I recently did a DNA test. I found that only 40% of my genes are South Asian (Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Nepali), while the rest are a mix of East Asian (I think its likely Tibetan, as Tibet is close to my state), European, Baltic, and a few others.

[@floe61]

You'll find that common for the parts closer to Tibet.

[@user-jt3dw6vv4x]

The founder population in China was not overwhelmed though, they continue to persist in China and gave rise to all modern eastern Chinese populations. Eastern Chinese are still 100% of East Eurasian origin having descended from various ESEA lineages, while Indians are on average 30-45% East Eurasian, having partially descended from the related AASI lineage.

[@nickb3345]

Then why do they look Chinese and not dark skinned or Black? It’s not the same population unless they adapted physically.

[@user-jt3dw6vv4x]

@@nickb3345 Firstly, Indians don't look "Black". The Ancient East Eurasians did not look "Black" either. Google "Tianyuan man reconstruction", that's what they looked like. Secondly, the lighter skinned ESEA or rather Neo-East Asian lineages descend from the darker skinned pre-EDAR East Eurasian groups that populated Asia (like Tianyuan Man who lived in northern China). Tianyuan Man is a more a Basal East Eurasian lineage and the predecessor to all modern East Asians. Tianyuan-related ancestry as a result is also known as "Basal East Asian" and forms one of the main East Eurasian branches alongside AASI and AA. So Chinese people don't have dark skin because the East Eurasian lineages that they descend from belong to the Neo-East Asian branch of the East Eurasian meta-population, these populations developed lighter skin and also developed the EDAR gene. However physically speaking, there are common characteristics shared between many ancient and modern East Eurasian populations, regardless of skin colour, like straight black hair, high cheekbones and neotenous features. Additionally, the dry earwax allele that is found in Asia is the result of East Eurasian ancestry. So dark skinned Asian groups like the Onge and Irula of India and the Semang and Maniq of Malaysia and Thailand respectively are genetically closer to light skinned Chinese, Japanese and Koreans than they are to populations outside of the Asia-Pacific. The difference is that the Onge, Irula, Semang and Maniq developed from a more basal East Eurasian lineage and lived in S/SE Asia where they retained their darker skin, whilst the Chinese, Japanese and Koreans developed from more recent East Eurasian lineages that developed lighter skin.

[@rupertbollywood1190]

Punjabi brahmin. I have: Ancient Ancestral South Indian 35.4% Zagros (Iranian) Neolithic Farmer 30.0% European Hunter-Gatherer 15.4% Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer 11.6% Anatolian Neolithic Farmer 7.6%

[@Ancestrallinguist]

Wow that’s cool. Thanks for sharing

[@JAMESJOHNSON-qs8qg]

Is Ancient South Ancestral DNA a way of not saying African DNA? I'm asking because I saw information about a lot of people in India having African DNA.

[@rupertbollywood1190]

@@JAMESJOHNSON-qs8qg No it's a different group - another word for them is Onge. They were the ancestors of Papuans and Aus aborigines. However, there is some African heritage in India including an African tribe called the siddhis, and some admixture from ancient trade routes (sea).

[@JAMESJOHNSON-qs8qg]

@@rupertbollywood1190 ok... I know the first people in India were from Africa and that Africa DNA is still in South India

[@rupertbollywood1190]

@@JAMESJOHNSON-qs8qg It's true all human haplogroups can be traced back to Africa. As far as we know, it was the AASI people who were the first modern human migrants to India from Africa, but today they aren't regarded as Africans because they have been in India since before anyone else. There is also Indian (from the time of ancient and classical and medieval India) DNA in east Africa, especially in Somalia (where Indian traders settled and married local women).

[@bikkyrana7581]

Completely makes sense, how the identity & culture has been redefined by few europeans who migrated to this sub-continent

[@thatweirdintjkiddo6251]

They are not Europeans cope they are Indo Europeans for a reason

[@jonswap9097]

Unfortunately the DNA claims given here about skeletons fron the Indus Valley Civilization are factually incorrect. Only one skeleton provided enough DNA to provide a genetic analysis, and the closest match was to Ancestral South Indian DNA. In addition, an extensive analysis of modern DNA in India showed the whole of the Indian population to be much more closely related to each other than populations outside India, and a gradual variation in for example Iranian farmer/Yamna DNA North to South and Tibeto-Burmese DNA North East to South. This is evidence of a mingled Indian population with a slow and steady influx of external DNA from trade and peaceful migration than a significant influx due to invasion and displacement of the native population. The complete absense of Yamna DNA is not stastically significant in a sample size of one, particularly if the two populations were separate cultures which coexisted in the same area in different settlements as in the Oxus Valley Civilization. What this means is that the Yamna DNA was also present in India at the same time as the Ancestral South Indian DNA prior to the Indus Valley Civilization. There is also a Dravidian language called Brahui which is spoken to the present day Pakistan to this day, close to where the ancient Indus Valley cities in Pakistan were. It should also be noted that the Yamna culture and Indus Valley Civilization cultures were completely different - the former were nomadic cattle herders who lived a pastoralist livelihood, and had an oral tradition of history much like in early Arabia or Europe, whereas the Indus Valley Civilization was settled, highly urbanised, and very structured. The post Indus Valley Civilization Indian Civilization seems to be a merger of the two cultures with the reverence for the cow, and the pastoral traditions in the Rig Veda, and the memorization of mantras coming from the Yamna traditions, and the writing of both North and South India, yoga, certain practices like yoga and certain deities like Shiva, and certain symbols like the Swastika, and a tradition of river/sea faring transport coming from the Indus Valley Civilization. If you want to know how this might have come about, look at the ancient Oxus Civilization which had Indus Valley and Yamna towns built close together and trading with each other. My take on this is that the Western coast was Ancestral Indian and they moved up the river valleys which were occupied by people of the Yamna culture to access raw materials for industrial manufacture and set up the Indus Valley cities on rivers to trade, mine, and process products for export to the Middle East and other places by sea. As in the Oxus, the two cultures merged and intermarried and became the modern Indian populations. The Indus Valley Civilization declined due to changing of the course of the Saraswathi river system, cutting off navigation to the sea, and only the minor part of the Indus Valley cities on the Indus river survived - explaining the persistence of Brahui in Baluchistan. The merging of the populations in culture, lifestyle and religion led to Hinduism, and the modern Indian culture. The claim that the R1 Y haplogroup shows that Indo Aryans invaded India from the steppe/Europe is debunked by the DNA evidence. There was a Yamna invasion of Europe which has been shown by DNA evidence. However this is not the case in India. There is no sudden change in R1 haplogroup in India that would indicate a sudden invasion. In addition the largest variation in the R1 haplogroup occurs in India, and the lowest in Western Europe, with Caucasian and Slavic DNA being closest to the Indian R1 haplogroup. This indicates the origin of the R1 haplogroup occurred in India and moved to Western Europe via the Steppe rather than the other way around. This probably occurred in two stages with Yamna populations moving into the steppes earlier, and then from the steppes to Western Europe in the transition from neolithic culture to early bronze age, and again during the bronze age collapse.

[@vikramgurung3043]

Brother you wrote a long line agreed..am north Indian east..but the Brahmin family in my tribe why they have blue,green some cat eyes..explain..also blond hair..suprise..

[@globanxiety]

So india was the first USA. damn

[@thatweirdintjkiddo6251]

@@vikramgurung3043 defined it's from Steppe Aryan also could e IranHG because of them having blonde hair varianta from Ancient North Eurasians

[@vikramgurung3043]

@@thatweirdintjkiddo6251 I am not archeological expert nor biologist but explain me Brahmins they call them self Arya putra,arayan..not Iranian but Russian Aryans their birth place steppe Rusia,look at Mahabharata serial they call themselves Arya putra.. Aryans belong to Europe..Brahmins I have seen have blue,green eyes some brown blond hairs..that's ain't Indian .are they..northern people more traits of rains..explain..

[@thatweirdintjkiddo6251]

@@vikramgurung3043 I got u brah you r a northeast Indian tribal but u confused how some Indians special Brahmins and other North indians got blue eyes? The thing is we North Indians have partial Ancestry from Iranian Hunter Gatherers (Caucasoid) population who mixed with AASI (East Eurasian core) tribals from Central India and created Indus Valley Civilization and later Indo Iranians (Aryans) migrated splitted from our slavic cousins and migrated to Indian Subcontinent and Iranian plateau during late IVC and they mixed with IranHG dominant people of IVC and gave rise to us. We own our blue eyes and somewhat light hair and skin to our Indo Iranian and Iranian hunter gatherer ancestors.

[@glennjacksonofficial3001]

It is true that a skeleton or skeletons from the Indus Valley has DNA that is Iranian related, but the idea that it was the IRANIANS who migrated into India and gave us this Iranian ancestry is just an assumption. Why can't the opposite be true as well? In fact a study by Vasant Shinde actually showed that it was the otherway around, as he showed that one individual who was a woman had a DNA that is ANCESTRAL to the Iranian population. But this is only one individual, because analysing DNA in India is very difficult, due to India's harsh climates, and geography.

[@Bavahar]

A new dicovery that bhim kand in madhyapradesh, India... Ancient paintimg rocks first human times more than 30,000years ago....

[@eastbayflora]

Yes, those were made by the native South Asian Hunter Gatherer population (SAHG). They first reached India atleast 70,000 years ago! All modern indians have DNA from this population, but it varies largely based on region and caste

[@vndalmia]

Fabulous. Clear and accurate

[@Procopius464]

I'm surprised there's not all sorts of screaming in the comment section. Usually when this is brought up, a certain group comes out in force.

[@starsian]

What are you saying? Most of what I see in the comment section is that certain group screaming lol

[@Procopius464]

@@starsian Well when I posted it wasn't so bad. Now it looks like all the nonsense has come out of the wood work.

[@Mayo_8239]

always the dravizoids

[@__rs]

​@@Mayo_8239 not every south indian has 100% Dravidian dna, for example Muslims/Christians in western coast like Kerala have mixed genetics with Yemeni, arab, Persian and Jewish people who mixed/married with the women of coast. But nothing new, your brain is filled with a lot of cow dung and north indian indo Aryan Iranian genetics superiority..I guess?

[@thomasbarca9297]

With first Australians and southern indians are related peoples

[@rishikeswaran8908]

​@ayeshaashraf9252 native Australians (tribal people) maybe closer to southern Indians

[@andreamessiasgomes7118]

​@@rishikeswaran8908 yes your right, India has many races actually, what he explained was major there are many minor ones too.

[@balramterry6697]

Yes.

[@ralph6417]

​@@rishikeswaran8908Not at all loose 😂

[@rishikeswaran8908]

@@ralph6417 Southern indians are mixture of australoids and elamites dude

[@truthseeker-nv6ny]

Brace yourself for attacks from triggered andh modi bhakts 😂

[@HelloWorld11332]

You should use your brain to analyse things being said. ``` He ignores that R1A L657 is the most common clade found in India accounting for over 70% people. There's not even one L657 sub clade found in Sintashta or steppe region, also this subclade evolved/mutated around 4200 ybp or 2200 BCE. Mean admixture date of the caste with highest steppe ancestory(high caste Brahmins) is around 900-500 BCE. *Stop lying man* ```

[@imgoingtotoilet7695]

Who is bhakts?

[@imgoingtotoilet7695]

​@@HelloWorld11332☝️🤓

[@andreamessiasgomes7118]

@@HelloWorld11332 nobody is lying you people are just in denial 🤣

[@HelloWorld11332]

@@andreamessiasgomes7118 do show me *ONE SINGLE* R1a-L657 from steppe.

[@gramki973]

The vedas and all languages including sanskrit were developed by indegenous people.Continet of europe is temperate and till 18th century bathig was a luxury whiek indus valley was civikized with well laid places for bath and drains etc.The civilization was indegenous ,migrants and invaders might have happened as India is warm and had fertile lands.

[@ck3289]

Early man came from Africa, Modern man came from Bharat[INDIA]

[@adelemarieish]

Can you please tell us more about how the Yamnaya were in Western Ireland?

[@Ancestrallinguist]

I have a video on Irish DNA History. I might re-do it in the near future with improved graphics etc

[@adelemarieish]

@@Ancestrallinguist Thank you I'll go and look it up.

[@rajatdwivedi1251]

Good information , that's true scientific evidence

[@Ancestrallinguist]

Many many thanks

[@christopherzantiotis]

⁠@@Ancestrallinguist You’re incorrect with your postulation that Modern day Indians are up to 47% steppe/Yamnaya. That’s an absurdly high amount making them like the English in terms of their Steppe related ancestry. No, Modern day Indians up to 47% descendent from a population of Andronovo people mixed with a little BMAC genetics on their way down. This population I am talking about that entered India were only ~35% Steppe/Yamnaya admixed. Remember around 1000 years had passed between the time of the Yamnaya and their expansion into Eurasia. They mixed with other peoples (mainly Iranian derived) and became new cultures. Andronovo is not steppe! So like I said, the people who entered India and brought the Indo-European language with them were only around ~35% steppe. This means that ‘India_Jatt’ sample would be only around 16% yamnaya derived (47x0.35 - 16.45), as an example.

[@CollectorMusical]

Amazing video. This is perhaps the best illustrated video I've seen on the topic of genetics. You copied off of Ancestralbrew didn't you? Even so, your content is much better.

[@Ancestrallinguist]

Thank you :) I will be releasing a video on Italian DNA this week.

[@Equal-k7q]

Great content and interesting information

[@KhmerKandal]

India is a continent and diverse.

[@gilles9532]

Whether we like it or not, the Vedas mention these famous migrations and also the Sintashta culture. These Indo-Europeans from Eastern Europe migrated to Central Asia and eventually settled in India. They played a key role in shaping the original Hindu traditions and language. These populations, which were relatively small and consisted of more men than women, eventually mixed with the local population despite the caste system.

[@rupertbollywood1190]

The evidence suggests to me that the Sintashta/Andronovo people were the first west/central Asian migrants to India, and they brought martial capability (1) chariots (2) Indo-European language (3) Vedas. However, the majority of central Asian/steppe DNA in Indian populations today (e.g. in jats) comes from much, much later migrations. Evidence: jats didn't except the Vedas except by force/coercion, and Hindu puranas and epics mention chariots (which originate from Sintashta) and revere the Vedas.

[@AnnaJohnson-e7u]

@@gilles9532 You have it all twisted. Indian culture did not originate in Eastern Europe else the culture and languages would still be used in Europe if it was so. The Indo Europeans country of origin was in India, they journeyed through the kyber Pass into Central Asia and into Eastern Europe, not the other way around. Your theory are all lies concocted by the British through Max Mueller. Before Mueller died, he admitted he lied and the the journey was FROM India and not INTO India. There are no Ancient Hindu temples in Europe. Get your facts right

[@harisomakantan6168]

Your mother told you that? 😅😂😅😅

[@indrajeet]

Completely debunked by modern genetic and archaeological. Your stone age ancestors didn't create our culture.

[@eastbayflora]

@@rupertbollywood1190 One thing youre misunderstanding. The Sanskrit speaking "Indo Aryans" from Central Asia were Proto-Vedic. The actual Vedic culture and Vedas was formed after they reached India and mixed their religion/culture with the already existing Indus Valley Civilization elements. the "Proto-Shiva" came from this Indus Valley Civilization aswell. And this is why Sanskrit has some evidence of words with Proto-Dravidian roots. Vedic culture isn't completely from outside, its clearly a mix. Also, what do you mean they were first west/central asian migrants to India? The first West Eurasian migrants to India were the Neolithic people who came from modern day Zagros Mountains in Iran / Elamite civilization area (They were NOT Indo Aryan speaking people, they were the ones who actually brought the Dravidian languages to India) These people mixed with the indigenous East Eurasian hunter gatherers and formed the Indus Valley Civilization. This civilization is the backbone of most modern Indian genetics today

[@naveenchandra672]

There is no Dravidian race, nor is there an Aryan race, It is the division created by the British to divide and rule.

[@au-delabattleworld9051]

0:12 The video has barely started and there is already an error that Dravidians don't look like Africans, they are like North Indians with darker skin. And it is skin color that bothers Europeans because they think that North Indians are a subcategory of the superior white race and South Indians are Africans a subcategory of the inferior black race.

[@keralanaturelover196]

This man lack knowledge. Andamans people came by sea direct around 5000 years ago. East indians were more related to them. South Kerala different people.

[@user-jan17]

IM SOUTH INDIAN BUT MY SKIN COLOR IS WHITE HOW ?

[@ayazahmed9489]

Your ancestors might be north indian who went to south india and did not intermixed.

[@user-jan17]

​@@ayazahmed9489 ok

[@nuzeta48]

You must have stolen it 😅

[@smitprmr]

Maybe Yamnaya DNA originated in your village and later invaded Europe and other low life peasants up there

[@user-jan17]

@@ayazahmed9489 im a one doubt same part of north Indian people are black how

[@jae3276]

I don’t get why the idea that everyone came from Africa isa Thing???

[@anshurani6265]

i dont think any of it is true , i stopped watching when you said Iranians came to India ,the truth is Indians migrated to Iran, history will be updated by Indians just wait a little more , as lot is happening in India, lot of research based on new excavations

[@thatweirdintjkiddo6251]

Saar AASI Migrated to Iran Saar😂 Iranian hunter gatherer is Indian saaar😂😊

[@aspeca_6]

lol india is once a country of richness..Sumerians were black people who were in indus river..Iranian didn't exist before dravidians..

[@thatweirdintjkiddo6251]

@@aspeca_6 Sumerians were Caucasoids not blacks wtf u smoking?

[@adityachoubey4946]

​@@thatweirdintjkiddo6251Don't try to be cool so hard. It's embarrassing.

[@thatweirdintjkiddo6251]

@@adityachoubey4946 hahaha trolling Indian nationalist who literally claim Indo Europeans aka Caucasus/Iranian hunter gatherers and Eastern European hunter gatherers are Indians 😂🤡 were Indians. I see nothing wrong in it😂😂😂😂.

[@Kris_Stiletto]

Very informative; thank you for sharing. :-) Peace, Stiletto :-)

[@elisabetta4478]

Africa is the mother/ancestral land for all humans onthis planet. The very first out of Africa fascinates me quite a lot.

[@indrajeet]

Homo erectus evolved in Africa. Homo sapiens evolved in divergence

[@AnnaJohnson-e7u]

@@elisabetta4478 this theory is not a fact. It was concocted by a couple called the Nealeys. The doctrine was spread and taught across the mainstream academia only to realize ancestral Eve from east Africa was an ape. This is a theory proven to be false yet it is still wrongfully promoted by so many misinformed people.

[@ankana2966]

Can you please make a video on Indian Bengali people? Their DNA, ancestry

[@CW-rx2js]

One correction: the aryans originated in the shintashta culture, not the yamanaya... They are two different populations and cultures

[@HeinousAeinous]

There were no Aryans in india before they arrived. The Yamnaya were the Aryans

[@thatweirdintjkiddo6251]

​@@HeinousAeinousYamnaya is PIE not Aryan actually Aryans originated in Sinthasta he is right.

[@sachinpotdar7798]

​@@HeinousAeinousAryans are indians not arians

[@andreamessiasgomes7118]

@@sachinpotdar7798 😂🤣

[@andreamessiasgomes7118]

@@thatweirdintjkiddo6251 what are you saying? So Shintashta is who n originated where?

[@surendrasingh_raj]

You are wrong that Brahmins have highest steppe DNA. It is Jats/Jatt(peasant class ) have highest % of stepee DNA, followed by Khatri/Arora (mercantile class), Gurjars ( Cattle hearders) and then Brahmins.

[@Ancestrallinguist]

I am going to do a video on this. Could you link any sources for what you just commented here. I think I saw that Jatt had highest too like 50 percent or more.

[@balramterry6697]

@@surendrasingh_raj The Jats are of Aryan ( Noble ) Tribes and Clans Ancestory.

[@vanisridhar5509]

​@@Ancestrallinguistyes, in Tamil Nadu too kongu Vellalars (agricultural caste) has a higher r1a1 compared to Tamil Brahmins. And normally agricultural castes in India have higher J2 haplogroup (Iranian formers).

[@vanisridhar5509]

​@@balramterry6697They are later migrants to India.

[@preetchaudhary1393]

You know who are peasant, if you know then how you says jats as peasant??

[@spiscold50]

I’m SOUTH Indian from KERALA🌴🇮🇳 a LOT of us are Lightskin too💯

[@PS-ns5kn]

Nope only tiny minority population mostly looks dark as tamilians.

[@Farjah-q5p]

never seen one.

[@PS-ns5kn]

@@Farjah-q5p Mee too 😂. But mostly they don't want to accept kerela people looks similars to tamilians.

[@Abdul_puncturewala]

There is no shame , proud on urs skin colour.

[@veeraniv6054]

For you guys looking dark or being a Tamil is a shame such a racist command section I've ever seen​@@PS-ns5kn

[@elidesportelli325]

1:30 very interesting, I love this argouments❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊

[@Shukpa]

@AncestralLinguist what are the sources for the data you show around @4:43

[@eastbayflora]

Calling Dravidian DNA as Indigenous is not accurate at all. The original Dravidian speakers came from Zagros Mountains in Iran / Elam civilization region and migrated east towards NW India. Then they mixed with the INDIGENOUS East Eurasian South Asian Hunter Gatherers (SAHG), and then formed the Indus Valley Civilization (IVC). IVC was a mixed race civilization and thats where the Proto-Dravidian language came from, and after it fell apart, people migrated down into India and the modern Dravidian languages started forming. The actual Indigenous SAHG people were NOT Dravidian. They are pre-Dravidian hunter gatherers, and they did not have a strong language or culture as they easily adopted Dravidian languages whenever they mixed (example: Paniya tribe in South India speaks a Dravidian language despite having 70% Indigenous SAHG dna and being isolated) ' So what im saying is, you should rephrase it better. South Indians have a higher percentage of PRE DRAVIDIAN hunter gatherer DNA. The original Dravidian speakers were Neolithic West Eurasians. An average south Indian is around a 50/50 mix of Neolithic West Eurasian (Dravidian) and East Eurasian Hunter gatherer (Indigenous Pre-Dravidian)

[@LotusFish]

My opinion here is based on me being a Southern Indian and I have observed enough faces in the region: I'm not a historian or any research scholar. But I can say this video clip is not hundred percent right.: . This author purposely forgot that India is Asia head. There is not a thing discussed about "the Indian Asian race"...... Possibly, logically Asiatic Indians still exist with exact Asiatic facial features all throughout the country. African mixes are there but very less percentage. Southern side people are more of an Asian features Iranian or some other white ethnic group features mix. Southerners have dark skin due to the super tropical climate not because of the African mix. Having African Asian features mix clans also there in minimum percentage. See Africa itself has so many clans which are different from each other with different facial bone structure and different body types, Even though all of them are in Africa. No race or no ethnicities are hundred percent pure. If they are all hundred percent pure then they must be very new clans. If we talk "About India DNA", We should wonder how many level of human integration amalgamation have been happening in India for the past 9,0000 years. This many thousands of clans keep on mingling growing exponentially and creating a new clan gene set is amazing . It is really the height of being in a great civilization. So no one can find the exact source DNA groups. It is not really necessary also. Mixed clans produce healthy gene pool. So why bother??! . I least bother to make sense anyway. This is just my personal opinion. Don't take it as a serious note. 😅

[@user-jt3dw6vv4x]

You are referring to the AASI but the idea of pure AASI peoples living in modern India is no longer true, the people of India are so heavily mixed that a full AASI person does not exist. This is why there are still no samples to date where an individual is 100% AASI. However there are tribal groups in parts of eastern and southern India who are mostly of AASI heritage that happen to have more "Asiatic" features similar to those found in tribals of Southeast Asia like the Semang and Maniq. This is because they are all of East Eurasian (Basal Asian) origin and share closer genetic affinity to Tianyuan Man than most other Indians do.

[@user-jt3dw6vv4x]

@bharanidharan-z1q Not true

[@chetangawade5002]

DNA test in USA Christian Missionery Church ✝️🤣🤣😄. And Report print in British Court 🤣😄🙊

[@bigboss.800]

😂

[@rupaabhi]

Simplistic, but good overview. A complexHuman story like this cannot be characterized by just a 10 minute KZbin video. Also just to point out, Genes are one thing, but the Person’s appearance and physical characteristics also heavily depends on the environment. I read in a paper that the Indian population which came from Middle East did not come to India directly. They settled in Modern Day Tajikistan and lived there for 1000’s of years before moving to India. So Indians are African, Middle Eastern and Caucasian all predominately defined by the environment of the Indian Subcontinent. As human beings have taking more and more control of the environment, the people of India will change too. Reminds me of an Example in a paper which talked about how the people of Kerala in South India are becoming taller and lighter skinned and more North Indian looking, but they are more genetically similar to the people of Dravidian state of Tamil Nadu. Fascinating stuff.

[@vishnu4313]

Over 50000 years and over they were no name like Africa

[@sriharshacv7760]

3:54 on the right is so beautiful and lively. One good thing that came out of AI.

[@Divine_wave23]

Fake 😂 Aryan theory is debunked . Even south indians many habe fair skin and north many have dark skin .major indian DNA comes from harrappa ancestry .this is said by your own david reich .😂

[@truthseeker-nv6ny]

Aryan theory is genetically proven and accepted by most geneticists

[@truthseeker-nv6ny]

Aryan theory is not debunked. It's accepted globally by all geneticists. Only few Indian geneticists with strong political views on this issue reject it

[@sahilsingh6048]

Andhbhakt

[@truthseeker-nv6ny]

Aryan theory was not debunked it still the most accepted theory globally by majority of experts

[@sachinpotdar7798]

​@bharani_tidadinaryan Brahmins your hatred will kill you arya means noble not race

[@coraW]

i believe north eastern indians also have tibetan dna

[@slavman1945]

we don't have Yamnaya ancestry. we have Sintashta ancestry. Steppe EBA and MLBA are two different populations.

[@slavman1945]

@bharanidharan-z1q EBA is Yamnaya. MLBA is Sinashta/Andronovo.

[@gowthamn3667]

Southindians migrated from kumarikandam who are the native speakers of tamil, agriculture is started by God murugan who is believed as son of God Shiva but he is an ancient tamil king who lived for welfare of people, he invented many things for people one of them is his weapon Vel which is in the form of human sperm, he didn't do marriage so he people called him Thiyagarajan,Instead he lived to empower human civilization. He is the most intelligent man who lived in earth Agree or not it is the truth

[@randomgirlonyt3221]

I’m not Indian myself but I have tons and tons of ancestors from India like years back I think 10 century or something so it’s interesting to watch my people nowerdays has dark skin and a lot of Indian complexions

[@marmara9741]

In Southern India, they are African colonialists.

[@fzlc7425]

No u 🐽

[@ItsShahed17]

Lmfao if Southern Indians look African to you then I have no words

[@nostaligagood3970]

So India is basicaly only 3 etnich groups

[@debkamalsarkar1521]

5:31 here... No you'd be pretty wrong to have said Caste system was based on Race... If so then most of the Brahmans and Kshatriyas would've been people with predominantly more of Yamanaya group But that certainly is not the case Otherwise the research is alright Caste fold wasn't so brutal in the past The idea went horribly wrong for sure But it was never made to be a mean to suppress one group And as you said the population was pretty mixed and it is till this date A good video but giving statements about a social structure without gathering proper intel is wrong It may feed wrong ideas to the viewers

[@SudhanshuKumar-b7o]

Caste was brutal and so it is now fck off for you delulu is the solulu

[@kiklocus4660]

beautifully explained

[@balramterry6697]

Their is no Culture older than India. The children of Africa are Dravidian. Originally coming from Southern India.

[@jmab721]

Please stop making such embarrassing comments

[@Dan-xx5jq]

I agree with that too...the reason being, if you take one strand of South Indian straight hair and hold it over a candle flame, it will curle up to look like our African brothers hair. Because a major part of Africa was on the equator where it was very hot. Eventually they became darker and their hair curled up because of the heat. The features also changed to deal with the extreme heat at the equator. The noses became wider so as to release the hot air faster. ( The opposite was true of Europe, because of the extreme cold, they had to retain heat and so their noses were smaller so as not to lose body heat. So the migrations had to have started from India. Likewise when migrations from India reached Europe because of very little sun, they became light skinned. I also saw Albinos in the Dalit community and from a distance I thought they were Europeans. My mind was trying to figure out how these European tourists got left behind India and were so poor???. There is even a YT video of albinism in India and how those who have it look 100% European. I am not trying to be mean. In fact there is a girl in North India that has albinism that has blue eyes and blonde hair, and is mistaken as German, although she sounds 100% Indian. And she is very pretty, she does not look like someone that has Albinism. Sadly, she feels very lonely as she is viewed as a foreigner. And Indians also went to Asia where again a mutation occurred with the eyes. I believe the cradle of mankind is India, as it makes complete sense that all different races that have come about from the Indian people. It is very difficult to make sense of the Out of Africa theory and make that jump for Europeans to have come from Africa. It does not make sense. And for the Indian to come from Africa to have that hair change and straighten up. Call me names for my theory but one day I will be vindicated when science catches and the missing links are found in India. 6:31

[@rajathispore2792]

@@jmab721In a dream, grandma said that to this person.

[@rajathispore2792]

@@Dan-xx5jq Grandmas often come in dreams. Don't take that for science, please.

[@ashwinvk4124]

​@@Dan-xx5jq I am a south India my hair is super straight

[@liveloveprosper2560]

When were the DNA tests conducted? Never heard of mass testing happening in India

[@rupertbollywood1190]

There have been quite a few studies based on skeletons found in the Rakhigarhi and IVC sites, Gandhara, Roopkund, BMAC, etc. As well as studies on modern day groups. Sample sizes in studies of modern Indian populations tend to be very small in comparison with other countries.

[@pryankamahmud7172]

I don't understand the point of undermining Aryan Migration or Invasion theory. For a fun fact as a Bengali Muslim living in Bangladesh we have very low northern Indian ancestry. Most of our population has lower caste converted Hindus or Buddhists though very few people will admit that. Lower caste people didn't have access to religious Sanskrit texts readily. Despite that right now we speak a language that's more than 70% Sanskrit. It only proves the massive impact of that small number of people that migrated from central Asia. It's very hard to change languages. Muslims ruled for nearly 500 years and the British for 200 years. You won't see people speaking Farsi or English in the streets. That means there was total domination by the Aryans at some point in history to shift the culture in a new direction. You don't only survive by passing genes you can survive by ideology and culture too.

[@floe61]

It's a Myth. You will understand when you start questioning the basic foundations it stands on. Besides, the Bangladeshis don't have to constantly fight an ideological war from a section of society ready to undermine their religious and cultural practices and divide them. The same is the case with Pakistanis. It's more of an Indian problem than a Bangladeshi one.

[@anthonyproffitt5341]

Is there actual evidence of the Yamnaya bringing R1a haplo group to India?

[@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg]

The genetic paper titled " formation of human populations in south and central asia " proves aryan migration clearly .

[@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg]

@bharanidharan-z1q True.

[@don2006ka]

Bunkum. Consider this irony first. You say Indus civilization was 65% Iranian farmers 35% AASI who wee Africans. You say later the Europeans came and mixed with these people. Strange that neither the Tamils of the South who formed the native Indian animistic and tantric culture nor the Brahmins all over India who formed vedic culture resemble wither the Iranian farmers or the Europeans respectively. You are neglecting the following facts: Indo Aryans migrated to India from South Central Asia Hindukush region. Around 2200 to 1900 BC, Sinthasta and Andronovo culture had been formed in Southern Kazakhstan region. BMAC culture had been formed in the Northern Afghanistan region. Indus Valley civilization had been formed in North Western India and Pakistan region. These cultures traded a lot with each and other and there was lot of movement of people between these cultures. Eg. Andronovo mixed a lot with BMAC to its South and vice versa. BmAC mixed a lot with IVC to its South and vice versa. Only from these mixed cultures a certain group called Indo Aryans migrated South of the Hindukush and formed the vedic culture. Similarly the Dravidian or tamil group was already developed in Northwestern India by then. The Andronovo, BMAC who were chalcolithic Iranians and the Dravidian people wer all Caucasoid, I repeat Caucasoid which is the keyword here. So Sinthasta which was already far removed from the earliest Proto Indo European Yamnaya culturally and racially mixed with BMAC who wer also caucasoid having their own culture and racial mix to form the Indo Aryans of South Central Asia who later migrated to India. When they arrived they met native peoples who were also caucasoid but different culturally and racially from them. Later there was further racial and cultural mixture in India to form the basis of Hinduism and the Indian race as we see today. Ascribing Brahmins to be Europeans and Tamils or Dravidians to Iranian farmers and proto africans is a very simplistic way of killing the history of modern day Indian race and culture. I did not talk about the Indian tribals and that is where I see the AASI people having greater prominence culturally and racially bit they are not related in any way to the mainstream South and North Indians of India.

[@don2006ka]

I will give example of fire culture. This fire worship is not found in any of the Indo European speaking people except the zorostrians who were originally Iranian and the Brahmins/upper castes of India. Its found in a weird sort of way though in Lithuania that is it. You have to accept that Sinthasta/Indo Iranians/Indo Aryans had a culture which was much more evolved from the earliest proto Indo European of 3500 BC. There could be some remote similarities in language and practices as I Greek or Roman history but culture is a continuous evolution that happens every 500 years or so. If Hinduism developed from a fusion of Vedic and native Indian practices, why cannot Sinthasta of 2200 BC or even Indo Aryan culture of South Central Asia of 1500 BC go through multiple cycles of cultural change and taking in the local people practices and also absorbing them racially into their fold. This is what happened in Indo Aryan people when they settled around Sindhu river. They were completely a different people to not only proto Indo European but also Sinthasta both culturally and racially. Bottomline Indians are not modern day Europeans in even 0.000001% of their ancestry both racially and culturally. Btw there was no concept of Europe in 2000 BC, duh.

[@healer1000040]

Long story short, they are the minority people who came from Persia, destroyed the Indus and Gandhara civilizations made the caste system, made Dravianes slaves, and still the same DNA based on hatred rules India.

[@thatweirdintjkiddo6251]

AASI is also very distinct from Africans this guy is very ret@rd to use modern terms for ancient population

[@Shivansh-rr7bc]

​@@thatweirdintjkiddo6251 Yes, these idiots don't know anything. They just get Knowledge from internet

[@thatweirdintjkiddo6251]

@bharanidharan-z1q because they r South Indian they descended from IranN/CHG male mixing with AASI females.

[@ShantaSingh-p1z]

Could you please tell me where the Singh came from. Thank you very much

[@Perumanian]

I like it because there are less likes on these videos - in which case it is usually truthful. Those crazy Indian nationalist stay away when faced with truth

[@Lulougonz]

What about the Sino-Tibetan, Tibeto-Burman speaking Mongoloid race inhabiting the north eastern part of India.?

[@thatweirdintjkiddo6251]

You guys Originated from Lao Hoabian and Tibeto burmans also have some significant AASI

[@Lulougonz]

​@thatweirdintjkiddo6251 I don't think so. Because, our oral history speak about their origin from Yunan, China. Their DNA also matched with that of the Chinese and Koreans.

[@thatweirdintjkiddo6251]

@@Lulougonz ngl Tibeto Burmans did have Ancestry from some culture i forgot about it from China. But Lao Hoabian is different from these culture but still related as both of them are East Eurasian. Also if u track very early in times you can trace your Ancestry from South India because AASI is also East Eurasian but still very drifted.

[@thatweirdintjkiddo6251]

@@Lulougonz All East Eurasian lineage splited from AASI.

[@thatweirdintjkiddo6251]

@@Lulougonz i will say get yourself a hunter gatherer breakdown of u want to know your true Ancestry.

[@Tom-ds5uk]

I am jat from punjab and according to ancestry DNA I have 95 percent dna from Central Asia-South and 5 percent from north India.

[@Tom-ds5uk]

@@shubhamji36thanks

[@snakerzgaming2568]

Your ancestors were Mughal or mangol

[@Tom-ds5uk]

@@snakerzgaming2568 perhaps !

[@snakerzgaming2568]

@@Tom-ds5uk most of Punjabi speaking community their DNA ancestry found in indian i think your DNA outside india

[@Tom-ds5uk]

@@snakerzgaming2568 probably

[@ajaykumarjha1608]

And now inorder to prove the 'Aryan race and the Migration theory' you have linked the Aryan society with the caste system which is totally flawed and irrelevant. Then is the date of Migration. Since you have to prove the 'steppe people theory' you have reduced it to 1500 to 2000 BC time so that you can separate the so-called Aryans from the Indus valley civilization, which itself is now being called by it's new name the Saraswati river valley civilization, after new discoveries in rakhigarhi and Sinouli in Haryana , India, and off course the now lost ancient mighty river, Saraswati, by satellite data mapping,

[@asherswing]

as an indian i approve of this video

[@kingalpha4203]

Do u believe ur early roots are black african? I’ve been told Indians don’t like Africans so I ask to understand not to bother you ❤

[@Ancestrallinguist]

Thank you 🙏

[@yashrao5269]

Yamnaya Tribe originates from modern Central asia which has a haplo group that matches indian DNA, and h is claiming these tribes are originated from southern russia. I Dont understand which point approves his video??

[@andreamessiasgomes7118]

@@yashrao5269 it's crazy yeaa

[@rohitmanocha6897]

That’s Witcher 3 background score !?

[@manmohansingh8106]

Whatever the DNA may say , every Tribe in India , whether organised in a state or not,is its original inhabitants . What’s a Tribe- a linguistic group, a division of mankind from single linguistic group in the beginning,and settled all over the world in its own territories now we see. The mankind first separated to each other in group by differences of tongues, later also separated by division of Land into continents. Further later,due to fights between groups, enslaving of defeated one mixing of blood occurred. As Sanskrit is written in dev nagri lipi,which is no earlier than 600 years.

[@hiphop24-s3s]

Slavs Russians doesn't have South Asian hunter gatherers DNA admixture while North Indians have Eastern European hunter gatherers DNA admixture

[@bbt9458]

I am the blood of Bharat

[@web_jar6630]

This is very interesting!

[@jegannagaseras6323]

They have to correct the dna finding, the dna not perfect yet

[@VivekSingh-76]

You are forgetting Pakistan and Bangladesh when talking about indian history and DNA

[@asherswing]

they are india

[@Fu-man-chu]

Nobody cares 😂😂😂

[@VivekSingh-76]

@@Fu-man-chu yes kids nowadays doesn't have any respect for their parents

[@agnelomascarenhas8990]

You are confusing Nations with Geographical entities. The focus is South Asia.

[@asherswing]

@@VivekSingh-76 lol

[@Sakthivel_555]

The Andamanese people are not of AASI (Ancient Ancestral South Indian) origin. The Andamanese are indigenous people related to the Australoid race, which includes indigenous Australians and the people of Papua New Guinea. There is no connection between the Andamanese tribes and the AASI group. The genetic marker Haplogroup H, associated with the AASI population, is not present among the Andamanese tribes. Researchers categorize the AASI population as having Caucasian features with brown skin AASI Home Land India The indigenous people of Andaman are the only group of people living around the Australian indigenous people who are of Mongoloid origin. The people of Indonesia, Singapore, and Malaysia are all of Mongoloid origin. Similarly, the Dravidians or Tamils Home Land Zagros mountain in iran Tamils or Dravidian DNA Haplogroup L are said to have migrated from Iran, and there are still places in Iran associated with the Mesopotamian civilization that have Tamil connections. For example, in the Mesopotamian civilization, there are places with names that include the Tamil word "oor" (which means "place" or "village"). Additionally, in Iran, there is a place named "Eelam," which is a Tamil word. There are several places with Tamil names in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iran.

[@Tate525]

They are related to Europeans via Yamnaya.

[@curiousobserver123]

Hey great stuff. I had this one question. Can you explain the genetic history of malankara nasrani? If there is a genetic mix, how can we effectively say when it got mixed. I want I'm to understand nasrani history

[@lakshmikesavan5284]

Nonsense about Aryan Dravidian race theory. This video should be demonetized.

[@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg]

Aryan dravidian is 100 % true. the language groups are quite different .

[@zitka123]

You can't digest. Its scientifically proven.

[@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg]

@@zitka123 What is specifically proved ?

[@zitka123]

@@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg I wanted to said Theory us true . Bcz North Indaian and South Indian DNA is different

[@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg]

@@zitka123 Thank U.

[@ivegotnotime4727]

What are the results of Indians from the states of UP, Bihar, Rajasthan, Gujarat on myheritage? Anyone have the answer?

[@Sanjaygawali8791]

i just dont believe everything he says

[@TTRR-y3d]

What don’t you believe that you came from Africa 😂

[@TruthWrite-p8p]

It's true bro ..... At least 99 percent of what is said makes sense . Do your research

[@jmab721]

5:18 A very important point that often gets missed in such videos is that the Caste system was not based on your lineage initially. Only around 100 BCE (1400+ years AFTER steppe migrations) did this system reach a developmental stage where the dominant religious groups at the time turned it into a Nepotism system. We have genetic data confirming it as well as the literature. What this means is that the Steppe people _did not_ establish a lineage based caste system we see later on in Ancient India. Because they freely intermixed with the locals. They had established a merit based caste system, not birth based. It's only the **mixed descendents** of those ancestral populations later on that created a hegemonic system based on one's lineage. One more thing that was missed in this video is that the correlation of steppe with caste tends to break the more Northwest we go in South Asia. It's uppercastes _AND_ Northwest South Asians who have steppe. That aligns well with what we always knew from the literature. Northwest ancient India was early Vedic hub, and early Vedic age did not have caste system based on birth. Even the only place in the Rigveda where we do see the mention of some earlier form of caste system, that was a LATER ADDITION to the text, meaning that originally even that wasn't there. Other Indo European societies like the ones in Europe were more similar to this _flexible_ form of profession system. No mention of shudra/untouchable either in the Rigveda. Just like no mention of them in European IE societies. All the groups with extremely high levels of steppeMLBA DNA in South Asia today are either of lower status or of the status of outcastes(those who are outside the caste system). All of them are Northwest South Asian, most being traditional war-oriented communities, again being similar to early Vedic system. Only brahmins are the exception that are part of the caste system as well as relatively higher in steppeMLBA, which is due to long standing endogamy. Interestingly, brahmins from Northwest are NOT high in steppe because the region was never so rigid in Varna system to begin with. While brahmins from Middle & Eastern India, the gangetic plains, are very high in steppeMLBA. The region being the centre of post vedic society when orthodoxy had greatly taken place and exploitation based on birth had also increased.