Indian DNA History 🧬 🇮🇳

ko-fi.com/c/0e... DNA 🧬 G25 masterclass
New Twitter/ X account x.com/ancestra... -
/ discord - Help Create DNA Videos 🧬

[@Ancestrallinguist]

Please Help Support the Channel :) , leave any video recommendations below! ko-fi.com/ancestrylinguist

[@B-I-G-N-A-S-T-Y]

Austrian stock living in Africa sending blessings to my cousins in the subcontinent, you guys are beautiful, make the best damn food in the world and are too good at dancing.

[@AtheistNationalist]

Thanks bro 🫡

[@smitprmr]

Thank you kindly.

[@jmab721]

Thank you, please ignore the triggered comments by our right wing fanatics. They don't represent all subcontinent, they're a bunch of radicals with free internet & lot of unemployment.

[@lschandankumar3661]

Thank you brother

[@sumedhsukhdeve9117]

blessings to u too!

[@israelquintanilla8314]

There is no pure race, we all are little of everything . No pure race period ❤❤❤.

[@Travelwithzanii]

That’s literally not true. There’s many ethnic groups in the world who have never mixed with anything. So lets not speak for everyone

[@Tate525]

@@Travelwithzanii Might want to check his other videos, even Germans are mix of multiple populations.

[@Travelwithzanii]

@@Tate525 ouuu wow Germans. Like I said there are other ethnic groups that are not mixed with anything definitely most so different African tribes!

[@user-sy3dg1vk4x]

TRUTH ALWAYS TRIUMPHS

[@s.b626]

Yes. But not here where lies are told

[@Bavahar]

A new dicovery that bhim kand in madhyapradesh, India... Ancient paintimg rocks first human times more than 30,000years ago....

[@bikkyrana7581]

Completely makes sense, how the identity & culture has been redefined by few europeans who migrated to this sub-continent

[@thatweirdintjkiddo6251]

They are not Europeans cope they are Indo Europeans for a reason

[@gramki973]

The vedas and all languages including sanskrit were developed by indegenous people.Continet of europe is temperate and till 18th century bathig was a luxury whiek indus valley was civikized with well laid places for bath and drains etc.The civilization was indegenous ,migrants and invaders might have happened as India is warm and had fertile lands.

[@MsKforbes]

One thing that I see in this videos is an underlying desire to be closer to Europeans and whiteness, especially through the idea of being fairer than people from other regions. The British created this idea of an Indo- Aryan invasion as a way to justify colonialism. Their made up classification of race and the inclusion of Northern Indians under the banner of Caucasian was to help them lay connection and claim to India's civilizations. Becaus advances made by a non- European ancient South Asian society would've challenged the theory of white supremacy. In their minds, it's better to classify those non-Europeans as kind as almost white in theory, but never white in practice. Also, the majority of places on earth have gone through series of different migrations from various people groups some having great cultural or religious influence over others. It’s not a unique phenomenon.

[@SpiritualSeeker-oq5pt]

Your first observation about colorism is correct. But The british didn't create colorism in India. It was there for a very long time. Lighter skin is generally more beautiful in general. A tall lean light skin person with narrow sharp nose is objectively more beautiful than a short stock dark complexion wide nose man

[@spiscold50]

I’m SOUTH Indian from KERALA🌴🇮🇳 a LOT of us are Lightskin too💯

[@PS-ns5kn]

Nope only tiny minority population mostly looks dark as tamilians.

[@anton_398]

​@@PS-ns5kn u illiterate pan masala thinking all tamils are not white, africa is a country. Illiterates

[@anton_398]

​@@PS-ns5kn u moms psy. 😋

[@Farjah-q5p]

never seen one.

[@PS-ns5kn]

@@Farjah-q5p Mee too 😂. But mostly they don't want to accept kerela people looks similars to tamilians.

[@Based.Afghan]

4:44 There is no such thing as Pathan Indians. The word pathan is an indianized word for Pashtuns ( The dominant ethnic group of Afghanistan ) The Pashtuns/Afghans are eastern iranic. So it doesn’t make sense to call them indians. Thats like calling a spanish guy slavic.

[@celtofcanaanesurix2245]

it more like calling a basque guy spanish considering they are neighbors who are genetically similar

[@Based.Afghan]

@@celtofcanaanesurix2245 yep its like 2 different branches of indo european family. Our kinsfolk are other eastern iranic peoples not the indics.

[@hellotombat5616]

You must be ashamed for deleting original people of Afghanistan and India. There are indian pasthans remember Zakir Naik​@@Based.Afghan

[@hellotombat5616]

​@@celtofcanaanesurix2245there are pathans of Indian origin no ancestors from Afghanistan 😂

[@hellotombat5616]

And you guys don't relate to western Iran paternally instead north indians and European aka Aryans

[@adelemarieish]

Can you please tell us more about how the Yamnaya were in Western Ireland?

[@Ancestrallinguist]

I have a video on Irish DNA History. I might re-do it in the near future with improved graphics etc

[@adelemarieish]

@@Ancestrallinguist Thank you I'll go and look it up.

[@Tate525]

They are related to Europeans via Yamnaya.

[@debkamalsarkar1521]

5:31 here... No you'd be pretty wrong to have said Caste system was based on Race... If so then most of the Brahmans and Kshatriyas would've been people with predominantly more of Yamanaya group But that certainly is not the case Otherwise the research is alright Caste fold wasn't so brutal in the past The idea went horribly wrong for sure But it was never made to be a mean to suppress one group And as you said the population was pretty mixed and it is till this date A good video but giving statements about a social structure without gathering proper intel is wrong It may feed wrong ideas to the viewers

[@arm3199]

When we talk about india..we talk about paramatma..when we talk about paramatma whats race caste country or continent..we are all the same!

[@bombayvega7021]

"Cast" is distorted labelled introduced by British. Its called "Varna" means Category". Earlier people were identified based on the work they do. "Scholars" were called Brahmin literally means "man with knowledge" "Kshatriya" were soldiers, same goes for Kshatriya which means "Worrier" "Vaishya" were businessman, Vaishya literally means "businessman" "Shudra" is a combination of "Shu" and "dra", Shu means beautiful, for example "Shu-shobhit" etc. Dra means "flow" sometimes called "dravya". so shudra means people who uses to make beautiful things. Tinkerers were called Shudra, people who used to make shoes, stonemason, making wooden utensils etc. It was British/Islamic rulers who twisted the meaning and destroyed the very fabric of Indian society.

[@whodis2792]

Exactly, thank you.

[@elidesportelli325]

1:30 very interesting, I love this argouments❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊

[@adriansummers3462]

The Fertile Crescent begins along the nile

[@sriharshacv7760]

3:54 on the right is so beautiful and lively. One good thing that came out of AI.

[@vishnu4313]

Over 50000 years and over they were no name like Africa

[@singnartungeh]

I am Sino Tibetan live in Karbi Anglong - India

[@mallikadas]

My great great great grandmother was Greek .

[@Devine_wave]

Fake 😂 Aryan theory is debunked . Even south indians many habe fair skin and north many have dark skin .major indian DNA comes from harrappa ancestry .this is said by your own david reich .😂

[@truthseeker-nv6ny]

Aryan theory is genetically proven and accepted by most geneticists

[@truthseeker-nv6ny]

Aryan theory is not debunked. It's accepted globally by all geneticists. Only few Indian geneticists with strong political views on this issue reject it

[@sahilsingh6048]

Andhbhakt

[@truthseeker-nv6ny]

Aryan theory was not debunked it still the most accepted theory globally by majority of experts

[@sachinpotdar7798]

​@bharani_tidadinaryan Brahmins your hatred will kill you arya means noble not race

[@sanjayshah7776]

This video is misleading in several aspects. It is almost propoganda Eg The Aryans migration/invasion theory has been debunked thoroughly. The CASTE is 100% Portuguese word. Until colonialisation , India had VARNA & JATI

[@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg]

Wh and how aryan migration was debunked ?

[@sanjayshah7776]

@@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg Seriously, please study the latest evidence. There is no architectural or any other evidence to support the Aryans Invasion/Migration theory into India. And for sure they did not create SANSKRIT LANGUAGE or produce the RIG VEDAS, (which was the motivation for manufacturing the Aryans Migration Theory). The colonial elites and current elites do not want the world to examine the very real OUT OF INDIA THEORY .....for which there is a vast amount of evidence. Slowly all this is being revealed. The good thing is, the Western simply dismiss the truth and evidence supporting the OUT OF INDIA THEORY .

[@balramterry6697]

Their is no Culture older than India. The children of Africa are Dravidian. Originally coming from Southern India.

[@jmab721]

Please stop making such embarrassing comments

[@Dan-xx5jq]

I agree with that too...the reason being, if you take one strand of South Indian straight hair and hold it over a candle flame, it will curle up to look like our African brothers hair. Because a major part of Africa was on the equator where it was very hot. Eventually they became darker and their hair curled up because of the heat. The features also changed to deal with the extreme heat at the equator. The noses became wider so as to release the hot air faster. ( The opposite was true of Europe, because of the extreme cold, they had to retain heat and so their noses were smaller so as not to lose body heat. So the migrations had to have started from India. Likewise when migrations from India reached Europe because of very little sun, they became light skinned. I also saw Albinos in the Dalit community and from a distance I thought they were Europeans. My mind was trying to figure out how these European tourists got left behind India and were so poor???. There is even a YT video of albinism in India and how those who have it look 100% European. I am not trying to be mean. In fact there is a girl in North India that has albinism that has blue eyes and blonde hair, and is mistaken as German, although she sounds 100% Indian. And she is very pretty, she does not look like someone that has Albinism. Sadly, she feels very lonely as she is viewed as a foreigner. And Indians also went to Asia where again a mutation occurred with the eyes. I believe the cradle of mankind is India, as it makes complete sense that all different races that have come about from the Indian people. It is very difficult to make sense of the Out of Africa theory and make that jump for Europeans to have come from Africa. It does not make sense. And for the Indian to come from Africa to have that hair change and straighten up. Call me names for my theory but one day I will be vindicated when science catches and the missing links are found in India. 6:31

[@rajathispore2792]

@@jmab721In a dream, grandma said that to this person.

[@rajathispore2792]

@@Dan-xx5jq Grandmas often come in dreams. Don't take that for science, please.

[@ashwinvk4124]

​@@Dan-xx5jq I am a south India my hair is super straight

[@au-delabattleworld9051]

0:12 The video has barely started and there is already an error that Dravidians don't look like Africans, they are like North Indians with darker skin. And it is skin color that bothers Europeans because they think that North Indians are a subcategory of the superior white race and South Indians are Africans a subcategory of the inferior black race.

[@Sakthivel_555]

The Andamanese people are not of AASI (Ancient Ancestral South Indian) origin. The Andamanese are indigenous people related to the Australoid race, which includes indigenous Australians and the people of Papua New Guinea. There is no connection between the Andamanese tribes and the AASI group. The genetic marker Haplogroup H, associated with the AASI population, is not present among the Andamanese tribes. Researchers categorize the AASI population as having Caucasian features with brown skin AASI Home Land India The indigenous people of Andaman are the only group of people living around the Australian indigenous people who are of Mongoloid origin. The people of Indonesia, Singapore, and Malaysia are all of Mongoloid origin. Similarly, the Dravidians or Tamils Home Land Zagros mountain in iran Tamils or Dravidian DNA Haplogroup L are said to have migrated from Iran, and there are still places in Iran associated with the Mesopotamian civilization that have Tamil connections. For example, in the Mesopotamian civilization, there are places with names that include the Tamil word "oor" (which means "place" or "village"). Additionally, in Iran, there is a place named "Eelam," which is a Tamil word. There are several places with Tamil names in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iran.

[@rupertbollywood1190]

Punjabi brahmin. I have: Ancient Ancestral South Indian 35.4% Zagros (Iranian) Neolithic Farmer 30.0% European Hunter-Gatherer 15.4% Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer 11.6% Anatolian Neolithic Farmer 7.6%

[@Ancestrallinguist]

Wow that’s cool. Thanks for sharing

[@JAMESJOHNSON-qs8qg]

Is Ancient South Ancestral DNA a way of not saying African DNA? I'm asking because I saw information about a lot of people in India having African DNA.

[@rupertbollywood1190]

@@JAMESJOHNSON-qs8qg No it's a different group - another word for them is Onge. They were the ancestors of Papuans and Aus aborigines. However, there is some African heritage in India including an African tribe called the siddhis, and some admixture from ancient trade routes (sea).

[@JAMESJOHNSON-qs8qg]

@@rupertbollywood1190 ok... I know the first people in India were from Africa and that Africa DNA is still in South India

[@rupertbollywood1190]

@@JAMESJOHNSON-qs8qg It's true all human haplogroups can be traced back to Africa. As far as we know, it was the AASI people who were the first modern human migrants to India from Africa, but today they aren't regarded as Africans because they have been in India since before anyone else. There is also Indian (from the time of ancient and classical and medieval India) DNA in east Africa, especially in Somalia (where Indian traders settled and married local women).

[@thusharasurajith4774]

Raghigadi DNA study (from 2500 BCE Indus valley skeleton) rejected the Iranian farmer migration theory. Ancient Indus valley genome lacks ancestry from Iranian farmers. The so called Iranian ancestry in Indus individuals and modern Indians actually predates the rise of agriculture in Iran by some 2000 years (12,000-year-old hunter-gatherers, not Iranian farmers) Indus valley people were combination of Iranian hunter gatherer(50-98%) and ASI. That ancestry is the single largest ancestry of modern Indians. That means Hunter gatherers moved westwards before 12000 years to wards the west not the other way around.. The ancient skeletons from Gonur, Turkmenistan shares ancestry with Indus valley people, Indus valley people migrated to central Asia in the bronze age.

[@slavman1945]

we don't have Yamnaya ancestry. we have Sintashta ancestry. Steppe EBA and MLBA are two different populations.

[@slavman1945]

@bharanidharan-z1q EBA is Yamnaya. MLBA is Sinashta/Andronovo.

[@HarishKumarPulapa-q6y]

Dravidian are not Africans Dravidians are highest in the world mainly Tamil Nadu madhura city chola Dynasty time advanced and kumarykandamu lost of this civilization

[@truthseeker-nv6ny]

Brace yourself for attacks from triggered andh modi bhakts 😂

[@HelloWorld11332]

You should use your brain to analyse things being said. ``` He ignores that R1A L657 is the most common clade found in India accounting for over 70% people. There's not even one L657 sub clade found in Sintashta or steppe region, also this subclade evolved/mutated around 4200 ybp or 2200 BCE. Mean admixture date of the caste with highest steppe ancestory(high caste Brahmins) is around 900-500 BCE. *Stop lying man* ```

[@imgoingtotoilet7695]

Who is bhakts?

[@imgoingtotoilet7695]

​@@HelloWorld11332☝️🤓

[@andreamessiasgomes7118]

@@HelloWorld11332 nobody is lying you people are just in denial 🤣

[@HelloWorld11332]

@@andreamessiasgomes7118 do show me *ONE SINGLE* R1a-L657 from steppe.

[@mailgach]

Ur so wrong on caste system...this is against what is recorded in Vedas...u guy's are trying to show Brahmins as European lol... if anyone is truly India its the Brahmins...Vedas have 4 varna which all humans fall under based on their Karma... and ur trying to link with migration... wow... minimal knowledge with European superiority complexity at play again from westerner's....

[@csnoorbd]

EASTERN Indian including Bengal and Assamese are ancient Indian ❤

[@lakshmikesavan5284]

Nonsense about Aryan Dravidian race theory. This video should be demonetized.

[@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg]

Aryan dravidian is 100 % true. the language groups are quite different .

[@zitka123]

You can't digest. Its scientifically proven.

[@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg]

@@zitka123 What is specifically proved ?

[@zitka123]

@@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg I wanted to said Theory us true . Bcz North Indaian and South Indian DNA is different

[@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg]

@@zitka123 Thank U.

[@Tate525]

15,000 to 10,000 years ago there was no concept of Nation states. Indians received their dose of yamnaya as well.

[@CW-rx2js]

One correction: the aryans originated in the shintashta culture, not the yamanaya... They are two different populations and cultures

[@heinous7036]

There were no Aryans in india before they arrived. The Yamnaya were the Aryans

[@thatweirdintjkiddo6251]

​@@heinous7036Yamnaya is PIE not Aryan actually Aryans originated in Sinthasta he is right.

[@sachinpotdar7798]

​@@heinous7036Aryans are indians not arians

[@andreamessiasgomes7118]

@@sachinpotdar7798 😂🤣

[@andreamessiasgomes7118]

@@thatweirdintjkiddo6251 what are you saying? So Shintashta is who n originated where?

[@rajatdwivedi1251]

Good information , that's true scientific evidence

[@Ancestrallinguist]

Many many thanks

[@christopherzantiotis]

⁠@@Ancestrallinguist You’re incorrect with your postulation that Modern day Indians are up to 47% steppe/Yamnaya. That’s an absurdly high amount making them like the English in terms of their Steppe related ancestry. No, Modern day Indians up to 47% descendent from a population of Andronovo people mixed with a little BMAC genetics on their way down. This population I am talking about that entered India were only ~35% Steppe/Yamnaya admixed. Remember around 1000 years had passed between the time of the Yamnaya and their expansion into Eurasia. They mixed with other peoples (mainly Iranian derived) and became new cultures. Andronovo is not steppe! So like I said, the people who entered India and brought the Indo-European language with them were only around ~35% steppe. This means that ‘India_Jatt’ sample would be only around 16% yamnaya derived (47x0.35 - 16.45), as an example.

[@rjaditya6865]

What do you scientifically mean by Aryan DNA and dravidian DNA Is there really such a thing ....difference at DNA levels?

[@thatweirdintjkiddo6251]

@@rjaditya6865 yup steppe dna, CHG/iranN dna and AASI dna

[@bbt9458]

I am the blood of Bharat

[@ss-ib8gm]

Yamnya were not aryans they are just 7 %that is too low it’s later migration through Muslim invasion as proved it’s more with pathans who are descendants of Muslim invaders of medieval times

[@paramagan]

What kind of crap is this? Our vedic culture is way older than what you stateing?

[@mokshpatwari6016]

Education left the chat

[@buntobilli]

Wow the ancient peoples were really hot 🙄

[@SpiritualSeeker-oq5pt]

they likely were, in the past 15000 years our jaws and face have become smaller and more recessed due to agriculture. A lot of them likely had high cheekbones and sharp jawlines.

[@asherswing]

as an indian i approve of this video

[@kingalpha4203]

Do u believe ur early roots are black african? I’ve been told Indians don’t like Africans so I ask to understand not to bother you ❤

[@Ancestrallinguist]

Thank you 🙏

[@yashrao5269]

Yamnaya Tribe originates from modern Central asia which has a haplo group that matches indian DNA, and h is claiming these tribes are originated from southern russia. I Dont understand which point approves his video??

[@andreamessiasgomes7118]

@@yashrao5269 it's crazy yeaa

[@Gog_Magog179]

If the Indo-Aryans close to Europeans were the Brahmins & priest that founded the Caste system in India, then the closest to their Hindu religion of ancient India I can think of is “Greek Mythology” or “Egyptian Mythology”. So Id suspect the Indo-Aryans entered India just around 300 BC during Alexander the Greeks conquests & expansion to Near East Asia, North Africa like Egypt is part of Alexander’s conquered territories. But I still hypothesized that the earliest inhabitant of India subcontinent look like those in Southeast Asia today, the Austroasiatics & Austronesians, their history is very early as 3,000 BC. Before India people got heavily mixing to Melanesians of Papua & Australoid and Persians & Greeks, or maybe even Egyptians. Coz how do you explain the spread of Buddhism & Hindu religion, even language & Abugida script system on those territories in Southeast Asia but the inhabitants look way too different in phenotype of Austronesian & Indian; in the same way why Buddhism & Hindu didnt spread to Melanesian territories in Papua NG & Australian aborigines.

[@andreamessiasgomes7118]

Do you know Indian history or not and why would it spread? Did Africans spread their religion onto others ??? Pls stop talking nonsense

[@M-Saleh-d3t]

You have nothing to do with india or indus valley civilization modern day indus valley located in pakistan and you belong to Bharat first correct name of your country

[@andreamessiasgomes7118]

@@M-Saleh-d3t why so mean? Be nice!

[@veerjan5045]

Open Toilet Forever

[@grizz9150]

So thats why the Nazis chose an ancient Sanskrit symbol for their flag I always wondered why. Europeans and northern Indians are both Aryan. Essentially they just went the other way out of Iran. Interesting.

[@KolyaUrtz]

well norther indians are only 10% aryans, Europeans depending where, can be up to 90% aryans

[@Procopius464]

The Swastica was also in use in Europe during the Roman period and even somewhat during the medieval period. It was also used in Persia. It was an ancient Indo-European design, but pretty much every branch of the family stopped using it, except for Indians, who persist in it mainly for religious reasons.

[@peshmerge44]

No, the Nazis started using the term aryan, when it was en vogue to write fantastical stories about once 'race'. No germanic peoples ever used that term until they started doing stupid race theories. Europeans are not and never were aryans.

[@KolyaUrtz]

ofc "aryans" as a race dont exist...but europeans are descendants of aryans(the ancient tribe). This has been established by science and genetics.

[@grizz9150]

​@@peshmerge44 That is simply not true. Agricultural civilizations who originated in Iran entered Europe through Anatolia at the same time the Indus valley civilization was formed. (~9000 BC). The Yamnaya civilization(~3500 BC) came from them then actually migrated from Eastern Europe went both directions to Ireland and Northern India

[@Vermont2023]

Total quackery! But most sweet and amusing!!

[@don2006ka]

Completely neglecting the fact that modern European race especially North west Europe and also all the North Eastern Europe has majorly a component of native European fatmers racially. Yamanaya had neither blonde hair nor blue eyes which developed in Europe among European farmers. Even the skulls recreated of Yamanaya bear resemblance more to Indian features than modern day European features. Native europeans adopted the language of the Yamanaya but esp North west and North east europe has a major native european component in their race. Some remote similarities in race between upper caste Indians and Europeans can be found only with certain people of Central and South Central and South eastern europe that too only with a few. Because Yamanaya racial component went majorly to Sinthasta but it was diluted a lot in Europe by native European racial component.

[@don2006ka]

If you look at some of the Irish very closely they have upper caste Indian features, same for Eastern French, Northeastern Spanish around Catalonia, Northern Italians, southwrn Germans and the Swiss, some Romanians, Hungarians etc. Because these come from the Celtic people who were originally in Central and Eastern Europe from where they migrated through French territory to eventually land up in the British Isles and mainly the western part of the Isles. But even the Irish are majorly mixed with the Viking and Scandinavian settlers and the Normans. So similarities to Indian upper caste people features is few and far in between. Take note that Vikings were no way original Indo Europeans they have derived their racial component mainly from very ancient migrations from Siberia. The Vikings, Germanic people the Saxons and Angles, the Norman's who were basically the Vikings settled in France form the main component of modern day North Western Europeans like the Germans, English, 60% French, 30% Irish and also the very ancient Siberians form bulk of the racial component of North Eastern europeans like the Czechs, Russians, Baltic countries etc.

[@Ancestrallinguist]

Interesting perspective. Thanks for sharing

[@don2006ka]

Thanks for understanding. May I admit though that there are some remote similarities between Indo Aryan, ancient Saxon and Norse mythology. This is well covered in a video by a lady comparing Indo European gods (I don't have the video link as of now, will share it later). But the Saxons, North Germans were mixed racially with the Scandinavians though the resultant race may have adopted some of the original Indo European mythology and hence the similarities. I am a upper caste Brahmin myself and have lot of interest in comparative ancient mythology and discovering the roots. Bottomline, there was of course an original proto Indo European race emerging from the Caucuses in Eurasia and spreading East and west through the huge area of the open steppe grasslands. But difficult to connect them racially in the modern context necause there has been racial admixture over the centuries both sides European as well as Asian.. I find Indo Aryan like features in only some of the Europeans but rhat too if I look at their faces very closely. And Indo Aryan or Brahmin/upper caste Indian features itself is mixed not directly but indirectly absorbing racial features of the native Indians though even as of today after admixture you can differentiate Indo Aryan features in upper castes with those of the native Indians. Of course we are all proud Indians now culturally and racially irrespective of the caste differentiation.

[@thatweirdintjkiddo6251]

Yamnaya had Blonde hair and blue eyes in low frequency Yamnaya= Eastern European hunter gatherer+ Caucasus/Iranian hunter gatherer. EHG carried genes for blue eyes,red hair and CHG carried some genes for light skin and some blonde hair variants.

[@don2006ka]

@@thatweirdintjkiddo6251 lol read history first instead of writing after drinking 😂 Yamanaya were caucaus people and had no blonde hair. It was corded ware culture and bell Beaker culture that developed out of Yamanaya mixing with a few European farmers that had traces of blonde/brownish hair and greenish/Hazel eyes.

[@Nazarene_Judaism]

Indians came from black Africa

[@tapaskumar4482]

Didn't you see the video

[@Nazarene_Judaism]

@@tapaskumar4482 Yes. They hate that they are africans

[@SpiritualSeeker-oq5pt]

@@Nazarene_Judaism Many Indians are darker complexion than the average African American. If anything they are black and African Americans are "brown"

[@oo_0824]

North Indians___ light skin or little bit brown skin mixed Western Indians __ light skin or brown skin mixed East Indians__light skin South Indians _ black skin tone❤

[@Anamika-if5fh]

This indo aryan theory you are referring is very old and outdated😂its proved now that there never was any Aryan invasion and there are enough proof now that Indian subcontinent had a consistent inhabitants from at least 25000 yrs also the Vedas refer to a roaring river sarswati and its scientifically proven that the now not existed river sarswati was 8n her full form and roaring arround atleast 25000 yrs ago. Also the haplogroup R1A1 was found only in Indian subcontinent primarily which includes countries like India Pakistan Bangladesh afganistan Iran tibbet Nepal and some parts of china and eastern countries and it the actually the other way round that it was Indians migration to other countries due to various factors like invaders trade education travelling or internal conflicts etc. so stop this indo aryan invasion theory spread by westners who don't want to believe that some other race is superior to them by any means😂in fact the way every country in the world is finding statues artifacts of Hindu Sanatan religion it is definitely true that it as actually Hindu Indians who ruled the world in ancient times. There are many incidents narrated in Hindu Sanatan scriptures and even in valmiki ramayana where it is narrated that Hindus people or kings travelled far countries like America African countries middle East, eastern countries Russia China and ruled there.. the chola kings of South India ruled some parts of China almost all eastern countries and travelled for trade till Africa and middle East and European countries and there was a reference in a book of a European traveller writer that Indians ships were so big beautiful powerfull and had four floors that infront of them the European ships were like toys or cheap copy. And these ships were of chola kings who had very strong navy army with these giant massive ships. 😂also there are incidents mentioned in valmiki ramayan that sugreev sent his arms in search of Sita mata on four directions to varios countries giving exact details of nature of that country or trees rivers extra and the army he sent towards North went to countries matching the details exactly like USSR countries like Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Ukraine and the army went towards west went to America. And other European countries and there are stories that how some kings fight with their family and went to other countries and ruled there. There are many places in America Africa or European Iran Iraq etc where they have cities rivers kings name based on Indian names in Sanskrit of course they are prounced differently now like even Rome the capital of Italy is based in lord Ram's name and other cities too. Even Caspian sea name is based on sage Kashayap who went to that region from North India from the region of Himalayas. There are several Gods goddesses in Athens exactly like Hindu gods even have similar names. They have sun God exactly like Surya or sun God of Hindus. Even Romani prople are from western states of India most probably from Rajasthan or Gujarat.The list is endless. If care to read you will get clarity!

[@sahilsingh6048]

Aagye andhbhakts spamm karne

[@andreamessiasgomes7118]

Just an ignorant with no clue, yup that's what you are.

[@stynershiner1854]

Lol. Making up false history to sleep better at night. Great job.

[@stynershiner1854]

Your name Anamika comes from the Greek Anasthesia. You are actually slaves of the Greeks. Not true? Where's the proof? If Caspian is named after Kashyap. Then Anamika is named after Anasthesia.

[@palestine5920]

@@stynershiner1854indians cannot be slave to greeks becoz indian use water to wash bum bum😂 how can slaves use water whereas master use paper?

[@AnjelLee-f8c]

This is all conjecture.

[@guna058]

It's tamil culture not Dravidian , the other southindian languages are the combination of tamil and sanskrit , so please call it tamil culture

[@Ayam-jw]

-🤡

[@ganeshmungal3251]

This is based on evolution which is why it's incorrect. Civilization began in India and spread across the globe. You have things backwards.

[@HelloWorld11332]

He ignores that R1A L657 is the most common clade found in India accounting for over 70% people. There's not even one L657 sub clade found in Sintashta or steppe region, also this subclade evolved/mutated around 4200 ybp or 2200 BCE. Mean admixture date of the caste with highest steppe ancestory(high caste Brahmins) is around 900-500 BCE. *Stop lying man*

[@Digby-x9o]

Candy floss!!!

[@dmddesire]

Hello, Still continuing max muller’s, William John’s, etc… theory… Make money and and fame other way !!!

[@nazrobin4223]

First learn how to read commentary for a professional video than read!!

[@katherinefields250]

Vikings make their way around the world.

[@MotivationalVideos4Every1]

You included an entire "INDEPENDENT" country of Pakistan in India. Indus Vally Civilization refers to the area which is in PAKISTAN, not in India. Do some research before making suching absurd videos

[@vihaan521]

"Pakistan" is "Indian Muslims-stan". Now you can call it whatever = Safistan, nirmalstan, paakstan, pakistan, shuddhdesh, asguard. etc. A name won't change what you are. an Indian Muslim.

[@M-Saleh-d3t]

​@@vihaan521The real name should be Pakistan's India because the Indus Valley is located in Pakistan. Indian Punjab and Kashmir belong to the Indus Valley. Tamil Nadu Bengalis have nothing to do with indus valley

[@vihaan521]

@@M-Saleh-d3t That is not true. Everyone in India has an ancestry that can be traced back to the Indus Valley civilization. Also, Pakistan's India doesn't make sense. The literal meaning of Pakistan is pure land. The word India, Hind, Hindustan, and Indians has been used for the south asian subcontinent for over 2000 years. If you are an Islamist who believes in ghazwa-e-hind, etc., you'd better use Mughal India. Or Mughalistan. But then again, that would glorify the invaders that conquered you. In fact, being a Muslim (not even an Islamist) itself is glorifying the conquerors who conquered over you. That is why Pakistanis have an identity crisis since their identity was stolen from them.

[@richJinny]

If you want to know more and more up to date info on this watch vids of Nilesh Oak.

[@boiled_fish_with_rice]

This is a half ass backed pop genome video Indians dont have yamnaya in them Indians have mixturee of bronze age andronovo and sintastha in them , and different tribes have different dates of steppe related admixture Also modern research on yamnaya the hypothesised proto indo europeans are formed from mixture of these iranian like farmers and eastern hunter gatherers, same iranian guys who visited india , so harvard whatever they claim about bringing the homeland to europe , Johannes krause still believes this pie pops is from baradostia in zagros and indus is a pie speaker ( heggarty et al langauge research and data set )

[@1143npatel]

Fake aryan theory

[@velu1671]

😂😂😂😂😂😂Truth is painful to you son of yamnaya

[@nickb839]

Son of trump, and big mama.

[@RaviKumar-yg8jv]

lol

[@abhikulkarni7089]

When isee this type of video 😂😵

[@rajadahir2066]

Every single channel is pushing these Propaganda video.

[@Gogetter-xc9ob]

What propaganda?

[@walkaway6777]

its not as clear cut as northern indians hvg indo aryan dna or south indians hvg dravidian dna, there are many south indiands with indo aryan dna n likewise many north indians with dravidian dna....and many 'facts' are mere presumptions

[@gkk3530]

concept of Arya-Dravida itself is false and cooked up story...created by Europeans to divide Indians.. 😂

[@simongee8928]

Same as Africa. Many folk see it as a country. It's actually a continent of 52 separate countries with many diverse peoples and traditions. 😊

[@starsian]

Not "many folk", only Americans.

[@Acrow0000]

Everyone eccept Africanists and Africans themesleves think that. 52 separate countries with hundred of thousand different languages and dialects and thousand different ethnicities and different cultures with various landscapes (Africa isn't only desert, savannahs and equatorical forests). Africa is huge and amazing, Occident doesn't know Africa.

[@RodriguezRodrigo-dj3df]

I don't know why western people only consider dark skinned South Indians as Indians. Even though not all South Indians are dark. They think all Indians are dark, which is absolutely ridiculous.

[@waqaralikhan6601]

@paulbaltuta-in7wq Because South Indians are the original Indians. They first came here founding the Indus Valley Civilization.

[@amolsonawane1476]

​@@waqaralikhan6601If they built indus vally in North they can they be south indians you should call yourself indians not South Indians😂

[@thewhatorwhy]

What do you mean?

[@InvisibleBoy-cb3dr]

They were pushed back by us Brahmin ​@@amolsonawane1476

[@divineflu34567]

​@@amolsonawane1476their genetics are closer to indus people now they live in south hence south indians

[@sauravghosh7064]

One of the few video by foreigner(non indian) that focus on dna rather than language based Indo-Aryan nonsense push by european historians

[@TheRealGhebs]

I don't know what you're implying here. the Indo-European migrations from the steppes of e Ukraine and European Russia into India, for example is definitely not nonsense, and they've impacted Europe much more than India, since it's rare to see anyone below 20% Yamnaya in Europe.

[@donvtor24]

He is trying to hide linkage to european origin of upper caste Indians aka hindu Brahmins or ruling class elite indians as they are politically amassing power claiming their indigenousness and otherising everyone else. So Indo Aryan migration hurts their narration.😂

[@Moonlight77162]

@@donvtor24 naah dont just make a blatant lie lol

[@guddu6424]

Nonsense 😂😂😂 , Sanskrit, Hindi is belonging to indo Aryan language family.

[@benjaminperez1149]

Nonsense. There are quite a few of these DNA videos. Quit with the racial division please.

[@anveshavyas450]

We've got a rich genepool whatsoever. India is like a mini world.. ❤

[@AndyFurze]

As someone who has romani ancestry on my mother's side i came back on a dna test as 7% indian continent,so this was very interesting and informative

[@andreamessiasgomes7118]

Romanis are not homogenous like they were initially when they left India now they are mixed and have different sub groups around the world.

[@gerardmichaelburnsjr.]

I may be misremembering this, but my understanding is there's a small group in Afghanistan that speaks a language so close to Romani that it is believed to be the original homeland. Similarly, Basque also seems to have had its origin there, or at least to I have a sister-language there.

[@AndyFurze]

@@gerardmichaelburnsjr.the romani their language is very similar to the language in what is north Western India for some reason and nobody hasn't come up with any correct idea why they really left.that they travelled through Persia.the middle east .north Africa. the balkans.greece.spain.eastern Europe. Western Europe eventually Britain and Ireland slowly intermixing as they travelled west.i look English but my mum's grandmother did look romani and my two uncle's black hair brown eyes and olive skins.in the mid victorian times romani were put under alot of pressure to settle down in one place for school and the census that is how my mum's romani side got settled.i looked it up on the 10 year census and they seemed to appear from nowhere in th 1860's

[@AndyFurze]

@@gerardmichaelburnsjr. the people who are called romani left North western India probably a 1000s years ago travelled through Persian.middle east.north Africa.the balkans.greece.easten Europe. Spain and then western Europe and then Britain and Ireland all the time slowly mixing with the local people along the way.i look English my mum's grandmother does look Romani black hair dark skin both my mum's brothers had black hair brown eyes and olive skin.ive only have to be out in the sun a little bit and o tan very brown

[@Hey-Women-iam-bear-choose-me]

No Romani don't get 7-8% south asian thry get half or more than half

[@rabbi50381]

We divide by borders but connected by our origin, culture and history.🇮🇳❤️🇵🇰❤️🇧🇩. Love from Bangladesh 🇧🇩❤️

[@stynershiner1854]

Northeastern Indian here. I have high Sino-Tibetan DNA. I pass as South Chinese.

[@Ancestrallinguist]

Interesting 🤔

[@Keeko.8]

I don't doubt it 👍

[@alani3992]

Because the NE did not have a big empire, the British forcefully added them to 'Indian Union'.

[@stynershiner1854]

@@alani3992 We literally had kingdoms, maybe not a big Empire. We had the Ahom Kingdom which remained independent for 600 years, free of the Mughals.

[@stynershiner1854]

@@alani3992 My profile picture is literally the coat of arms of the Ahom Kingdom.

[@SisayBilelegne]

All human beings start or came from africa.however the rest countries do not want to say.because they may feel undeveloped,3rd world country.the truth is africa is the mother of all humanties.❤🎉

[@Acrow0000]

@@SisayBilelegne Remember that it is a theory, what if tomorrow they find older homo bones somewhere in America, Australia or Eurasia ?

[@indrajeet]

Lol, keep telling yourself that. Homo erectus evolved in Africa. Homo sapiens evolved in divergence

[@AnnaJohnson-e7u]

@@SisayBilelegne the truth is your theory has long been debunked. We did not all come from Africa. Why haven’t the negroes evolved if so . Such a bullshit theory

[@adarshdixit2918]

Some indians also have bmac ancestry...so some of us also have few amount of Anatolian farmers dna

[@templersmount6976]

People always forget that there are so many different groups of people other than Indo-Aryans and Dravidians.

[@rravisankar3355]

When there's never a race called Aryan in reality ever existed what's point of all these concoction!

[@ralph6417]

Lol

[@Gogetter-xc9ob]

Yk truth always tastes the worst 😂

[@gerardmichaelburnsjr.]

Cyrus the Great, in effect the founder of the Persian empire, said he and his people were Aryans. The word 'Iran', means 'Aryan' in Farsi. The Medes, who dominated what is now Iran before the Persians, said.the Persians were Invaders from the north, the Uman Mazda, or at least related to them, and could speak with each other without interpreters. So, Aryan may not qualify as a 'race', which is a hard to define term, but they were evidently a large culturally and linguistically defined people at one time.

[@truthreal3378]

For those of you who're making fun in the comment by typing " _lol_ or _Yk truth always tastes the_ ...." should realize that they also have those Arya-DNA in them. I suggest them to get their DNA Tested! Let's see if they themselves can digest what they consider as bitter truth or not! It's my open challenge to you all!

[@truthreal3378]

@@gerardmichaelburnsjr. Arya simply refers to noble, hardworking, civilized, and honest people. You can hear people from Russia, Africa, the Arab world, the USA, America, Europe, Japan, or China proudly stating that they come from a civilized and cultured society! That's precisely what Arya means in Sanskrit or Pali! It did not mean race! IDK about Iranian or Avestan as I haven't studied those languages! But I'm pretty sure they also meant this!

[@whatapp4797]

The Hittites were Indo-Europeans in Turkey who worshipped the gods Indra, Mitra and Varuna. These gods are also in Hinduism.

[@AnnaJohnson-e7u]

@@whatapp4797 that’s right, they were all Indo tribes. I can’t understand how people cannot see the resemblance or make the connection. Indians, because of the geographical location has multitude of genetic mixtures so the appearance are very exotic but all in all these people all migrated from the Indus Valley

[@nsvdmuraliprasad2316]

I think Mittani not Hittites

[@AnnaJohnson-e7u]

@@nsvdmuraliprasad2316 the Hittites language is Indo European and derived from Sanskrit, look it up. Language gives a clear indication about ethnicities

[@vanisridhar5509]

Indra varuna are related to Dravidians i.e ancient Iranians

[@gkk3530]

​@@vanisridhar5509another imagination ? Indra / Varuna etc are names given to different powers in nature and it is from Vedic culture...

[@nostaligagood3970]

So India is basicaly only 3 etnich groups

[@user-jt3dw6vv4x]

The founder population in China was not overwhelmed though, they continue to persist in China and gave rise to all modern eastern Chinese populations. Eastern Chinese are still 100% of East Eurasian origin having descended from various ESEA lineages, while Indians are on average 30-45% East Eurasian, having partially descended from the related AASI lineage.

[@nickb3345]

Then why do they look Chinese and not dark skinned or Black? It’s not the same population unless they adapted physically.

[@user-jt3dw6vv4x]

@@nickb3345 Firstly, Indians don't look "Black". The Ancient East Eurasians did not look "Black" either. Google "Tianyuan man reconstruction", that's what they looked like. Secondly, the lighter skinned ESEA or rather Neo-East Asian lineages descend from the darker skinned pre-EDAR East Eurasian groups that populated Asia (like Tianyuan Man who lived in northern China). Tianyuan Man is a more a Basal East Eurasian lineage and the predecessor to all modern East Asians. Tianyuan-related ancestry as a result is also known as "Basal East Asian" and forms one of the main East Eurasian branches alongside AASI and AA. So Chinese people don't have dark skin because the East Eurasian lineages that they descend from belong to the Neo-East Asian branch of the East Eurasian meta-population, these populations developed lighter skin and also developed the EDAR gene. However physically speaking, there are common characteristics shared between many ancient and modern East Eurasian populations, regardless of skin colour, like straight black hair, high cheekbones and neotenous features. Additionally, the dry earwax allele that is found in Asia is the result of East Eurasian ancestry. So dark skinned Asian groups like the Onge and Irula of India and the Semang and Maniq of Malaysia and Thailand respectively are genetically closer to light skinned Chinese, Japanese and Koreans than they are to populations outside of the Asia-Pacific. The difference is that the Onge, Irula, Semang and Maniq developed from a more basal East Eurasian lineage and lived in S/SE Asia where they retained their darker skin, whilst the Chinese, Japanese and Koreans developed from more recent East Eurasian lineages that developed lighter skin.

[@MNSF99]

Amazing video. This is perhaps the best illustrated video I've seen on the topic of genetics. You copied off of Ancestralbrew didn't you? Even so, your content is much better.

[@Ancestrallinguist]

Thank you :) I will be releasing a video on Italian DNA this week.

[@rupaabhi]

Simplistic, but good overview. A complexHuman story like this cannot be characterized by just a 10 minute KZbin video. Also just to point out, Genes are one thing, but the Person’s appearance and physical characteristics also heavily depends on the environment. I read in a paper that the Indian population which came from Middle East did not come to India directly. They settled in Modern Day Tajikistan and lived there for 1000’s of years before moving to India. So Indians are African, Middle Eastern and Caucasian all predominately defined by the environment of the Indian Subcontinent. As human beings have taking more and more control of the environment, the people of India will change too. Reminds me of an Example in a paper which talked about how the people of Kerala in South India are becoming taller and lighter skinned and more North Indian looking, but they are more genetically similar to the people of Dravidian state of Tamil Nadu. Fascinating stuff.

[@elisabetta4478]

Africa is the mother/ancestral land for all humans onthis planet. The very first out of Africa fascinates me quite a lot.

[@indrajeet]

Homo erectus evolved in Africa. Homo sapiens evolved in divergence

[@ajay007au]

Nice half-baked story. You have to study more!!

[@Dan-xx5jq]

Some will hate me for this but i believe that India is the cradle of mankind. India is where mankind first came about for reasons below which make total sense!! If you take one strand of South Indian straight hair and hold it over heat like a candle flame, it will curle up to look like our African brothers hair. Because a major part of Africa was on the equator where it was very hot, when ancient natives of India moved to Africa and the equator they eventually became darker skinned and their hair curled up because of the heat. The features also changed to deal with the extreme heat at the equator. The noses became wider so as to release the hot air faster. (The opposite is true of Europe, because of the extreme cold, the ancient native of India that moved there, had to retain body heat and so their noses were smaller so as not to lose that heat. So the migrations had to have started from India. Likewise when migrations from India reached Europe because of very little sun, they became light skinned. I also saw Albinos in the Dalit community and from a distance I thought they were Europeans. My mind was trying to figure out how these European tourists got left behind India and were so poor???. There is even a YT video of albinism in India and how those who have it look 100% European. I am not trying to be mean. In fact there is a girl in North India that was in the news, that has albinism and had blue eyes and blonde hair, and is mistaken as German, although she sounds 100% Indian. And she is very pretty, she does not look like someone that has Albinism. Sadly, she feels very lonely as she is viewed as a foreigner. And i believe Indians also went to Asia where again a mutation occurred with the eyes. I believe the cradle of mankind is India, as it makes complete and total sense that all different races that have come about in the world would come from the Indian people. It is very difficult to make sense of the Out of Africa theory and make that jump for Europeans to have come from Africa. It does not make sense. And for the Indian to come from Africa to have their hair straighten up....!! There would be no environmental factors to cause the hair to straighten up! i expect to get a lot of hate but like has happened before, the scientific community will figure out they got it all wrong when skeletons of ancient people are found in India and the world.

[@mohamedgoldstein5565]

Wow. Thats madrassa level science!

[@Just_forfun9140]

You have an interesting theory. Something happened in India, its like the tower of babel for languages, it could be the land of origin of many races or a precursor. They need to find many ancient skeletons from 5,10,15, 20K years ago from various regions of India, then we get a better picture. Its possible from India people migrated to various regions, after thousands of years the descendents migrated back to India? Who knows, so far no one knows 100% for sure.

[@Just_forfun9140]

I saw the YT video of a Albino woman in India, she looks like a northern European woman, not even from southern Europe. Indians who lose their pigment due to autoimmune condition, they also look European.

[@user-zq5dh6jr8n]

bro wasted 1200 words

[@globanxiety]

@@Just_forfun9140 The oldest skeletons found in india are from river narmada, dates back 140000 years. they're also the oldest pre-neolithic remains we have in the world. there's a video on YT about this recent discovery

[@rohitmanocha6897]

That’s Witcher 3 background score !?

[@HarishKumarPulapa-q6y]

Bro you western theory don't tell you really find the indian civilizations you have a time machine oldest civilization in the world

[@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg]

Most backward unscientific blind faith hinduthwa !

[@HiteshkrNEET]

Why did you not cover North East Indians?

[@Xphqntom]

Hes dumb probably

[@Shukpa]

@AncestralLinguist what are the sources for the data you show around @4:43

[@LotusFish]

My opinion here is based on me being a Southern Indian and I have observed enough faces in the region: I'm not a historian or any research scholar. But I can say this video clip is not hundred percent right.: . This author purposely forgot that India is Asia head. There is not a thing discussed about "the Indian Asian race"...... Possibly, logically Asiatic Indians still exist with exact Asiatic facial features all throughout the country. African mixes are there but very less percentage. Southern side people are more of an Asian features Iranian or some other white ethnic group features mix. Southerners have dark skin due to the super tropical climate not because of the African mix. Having African Asian features mix clans also there in minimum percentage. See Africa itself has so many clans which are different from each other with different facial bone structure and different body types, Even though all of them are in Africa. No race or no ethnicities are hundred percent pure. If they are all hundred percent pure then they must be very new clans. If we talk "About India DNA", We should wonder how many level of human integration amalgamation have been happening in India for the past 9,0000 years. This many thousands of clans keep on mingling growing exponentially and creating a new clan gene set is amazing . It is really the height of being in a great civilization. So no one can find the exact source DNA groups. It is not really necessary also. Mixed clans produce healthy gene pool. So why bother??! . I least bother to make sense anyway. This is just my personal opinion. Don't take it as a serious note. 😅

[@user-jt3dw6vv4x]

You are referring to the AASI but the idea of pure AASI peoples living in modern India is no longer true, the people of India are so heavily mixed that a full AASI person does not exist. This is why there are still no samples to date where an individual is 100% AASI. However there are tribal groups in parts of eastern and southern India who are mostly of AASI heritage that happen to have more "Asiatic" features similar to those found in tribals of Southeast Asia like the Semang and Maniq. This is because they are all of East Eurasian (Basal Asian) origin and share closer genetic affinity to Tianyuan Man than most other Indians do.

[@user-jt3dw6vv4x]

@bharanidharan-z1q Not true

[@jegannagaseras6323]

They have to correct the dna finding, the dna not perfect yet

[@user-jan17]

IM SOUTH INDIAN BUT MY SKIN COLOR IS WHITE HOW ?

[@ayazahmed9489]

Your ancestors might be north indian who went to south india and did not intermixed.

[@user-jan17]

​@@ayazahmed9489 ok

[@nuzeta48]

You must have stolen it 😅

[@smitprmr]

Maybe Yamnaya DNA originated in your village and later invaded Europe and other low life peasants up there

[@user-jan17]

@@ayazahmed9489 im a one doubt same part of north Indian people are black how

[@VYBCTV]

This video is ok only. You should not jump to conclusions that IVC people spoke Tamil kind of statements without any proof. Please read my conclusions and statements which I made by referring Shinde report. I sent it to many videos including Ancestral Brew channel. Zagrosian Iranians who mixed with South Asian Hunter Gatherers(who were present all over south asia as hunter- gatherers) to form Indus Valley Civilization were those who split from Iranian pastoralists and hunters 8,000 years before they learned farming from Fertile Crescent, Iraq. So the language spoke by IVC people would have been proto Elamite mixed with some language spoken by South Asian hunter gatherers. Indo Aryans came after the decline of Indus Valley Civilization. They came from Southern Russia bordering Kazhaksthan. Before entering Afghanistan and Pakisthan. They learned agriculture from people of Bactria Margiana Archaeological Complex. That's why agricultural methods and crops used by Indo Aryans in Vedic period was identical to BMAC and not related to IVC. (Aryans cultivated barley, pulses and lentils in the banks of Saptha Sindhu, West Punjab. It was only after they mixed with IVC people they began to farm rice on Yamuna &Gangetic plains.) Sanskrit, Avestan & Mittani are closely related languages than any other Indo European language. All these three languages are 3700 years old. Only relation we have with these European languages is because there is a common ancestor for all Indo European languages originated in West Eurasian Steppes that was not Sanskrit. It is yet to be foundout. Sanskrit originated in Afghanisthan. Later spread to Saptha Sindhu region, Ganga, Yamuna & Narmada. Finally came down to Southern Peninsula & Srilanka. Tamil originated in Tamilnadu from Proto Dravidian. It is 2800 year old language. IVC people spoke a language related to Proto Elamite. While South Asian Hunters spoke a Srilankan Vedda related or Australian Aboriginal language. Both languages are not spoken today in South Asia. Ok coming to genetics 63% Indians are mix of people from South Russian Steppes, Zagros,Iran& South Asia. North Indians have more Steppe ancestry because of various invasions and settlements from Turkmenstan, Persia etc. But their basic DNA is same as South Indian Upper & Middle castes. North Easterners and Ladakhi people have Sino Tibetan and Sino Burmese ancestors. But their culture and traditions are like any indigenous tribal culture found around our country. No matter where we come from we are Indians first. Jai Hind. Yours Gouri Sankar.K 👍🙏🇮🇳 www.palakkadwalks.blogspot.com

[@jspillai1869]

What is the story of Nairs of Kerala, genetic makeup as there are conflicting theories of their origin. My husband is from Kunisserri in Palakkad.

[@VYBCTV]

​​​​​​​@@jspillai1869 Hello madam, there are lot of stories about Nairs like any other community based on phenotypes, facial features and folklore. Ahichatra (Rampur, U.P)Naga and Nepali Newar origins are the most popular stories about Nairs and Bunts circulating on the internet. Bunts, Nairs, Ambalavasis and Thiyyas are matrilineal castes. But none of the castes in UttarPradesh or Uttarakhand are matrilineal. Nagas were worshipped in many parts of India particularly forest tribes. We don't know what South Asian Hunters and Zagrosian people worshipped before Indo Aryan migration. 70% of what we call Hinduism was invented by Indo Aryan/Sanskrit speakers only. It is an umbrella term for many philosophical thoughts and spiritual beliefs.(Vedas, Upanishads, Dharmashastras, Puranas, Ithihasas, Agamas, Thantras etc.) It maybe fascinating to know that ancient people were more broadminded when it comes to marriage. People of Indian subcontinent is a great example. Steppe DNA of Tamil Brahmins are highest among Southern Brahmins. Iyer - 13-20% Iyengar - 11-20% Tulu Brahmin - 15% Namboodiri - 12-16% Telugu Brahmin - 12-17% Kannada Brahmin - 11-18% Marathi Brahmins - 13-16% Konkani Brahmins - 13-17% Closest Genetic Distance Of Tamil Brahmins To Other Communities. (Iam a mix of Iyengar and Iyer.) 1. Telugu Brahmins 2. Malayali Nairs 3. Malayali Nasranis 4. Gujarati Baniyas 5. Punjabi Gujjars 6. Marathi Brahmins 7. Kannada Brahmins 8. Konkani Brahmins 9. Bengali Brahmins 10. UttarPradesh Kayasthas Steppe DNA of Nairs & Pathare Prabhus are highest among South Indian non Brahmins. Nairs on average have 10% steppe DNA. It reaches 16% maximum. Pathare Prabhus on average have 14% steppe DNA. It reaches 18% maximum. Steppe Blood Of Non Brahmin South Indians Who Have More Than 5% Are Given Below Nairs - 10-16% Bunts - 10-12% Ambalavasis - 8-14% Thiyyas - 9-11% Kodavas - 10-13% Ezhavas - 7-11% Reddy - 5 - 9% Balija - 6 - 9% Kamma - 7-11% Vellalar - 9-10% Mukkulathor - 8-12% Vokkaliga - 5- 10% Marathas - 8-12% Mahar - 8-10% Chandra Seniya Kayastha Prabhu - 10-16% Pathare Prabhus - 14 - 18% Among Non Hindus in South India Nasranis - 9-15% Konkani Christian - 15% Mappilas - 10% Rowther - 12% Marakkar - 9% Hyderabadi Muslim - 14% Nadar Christian - 8% As you all know Iam an online researcher and blogger specializing in philosophy, spirituality, history, linguistics, archaeology and genetics of south asia. I want to share a great news in this group us Tamil Brahmins have largest percentage of Sintastha blood (Poltkava + Abashevo) among South Indian Brahmins. Iyers - 13% - 20% Iyengar - 11% - 20% And we have the largest percentage of Indus Valley Civilization blood (Zagrosians From Iran/Proto Elamites + South Asian Hunter Gatherers) among all Brahmin groups in India. Iyers - 54% - 73% Iyengars - 49% - 68% Wow..😃👌🏻 Proud to have both in large amounts.🇮🇳 30% Tamil Brahmins have 13- 20 %Anatolian DNA received from BMAC. And 20% of us have 3 - 9% Sino Tibetan DNA too. Courtesy : South Asian Ancestry Reddit. Thankyou.

[@TingTong2568]

@@VYBCTV thanks for the info

[@VYBCTV]

@@TingTong2568 🙏😊

[@cameronpillay8050]

Nobody gonna read all yr bs 🤭 the ivc were tamil people, even the name ' Harappa ' is a Tamil word 😊 continue hatin' , it's amusing 🤡🔫

[@jonswap9097]

Unfortunately the DNA claims given here about skeletons fron the Indus Valley Civilization are factually incorrect. Only one skeleton provided enough DNA to provide a genetic analysis, and the closest match was to Ancestral South Indian DNA. In addition, an extensive analysis of modern DNA in India showed the whole of the Indian population to be much more closely related to each other than populations outside India, and a gradual variation in for example Iranian farmer/Yamna DNA North to South and Tibeto-Burmese DNA North East to South. This is evidence of a mingled Indian population with a slow and steady influx of external DNA from trade and peaceful migration than a significant influx due to invasion and displacement of the native population. The complete absense of Yamna DNA is not stastically significant in a sample size of one, particularly if the two populations were separate cultures which coexisted in the same area in different settlements as in the Oxus Valley Civilization. What this means is that the Yamna DNA was also present in India at the same time as the Ancestral South Indian DNA prior to the Indus Valley Civilization. There is also a Dravidian language called Brahui which is spoken to the present day Pakistan to this day, close to where the ancient Indus Valley cities in Pakistan were. It should also be noted that the Yamna culture and Indus Valley Civilization cultures were completely different - the former were nomadic cattle herders who lived a pastoralist livelihood, and had an oral tradition of history much like in early Arabia or Europe, whereas the Indus Valley Civilization was settled, highly urbanised, and very structured. The post Indus Valley Civilization Indian Civilization seems to be a merger of the two cultures with the reverence for the cow, and the pastoral traditions in the Rig Veda, and the memorization of mantras coming from the Yamna traditions, and the writing of both North and South India, yoga, certain practices like yoga and certain deities like Shiva, and certain symbols like the Swastika, and a tradition of river/sea faring transport coming from the Indus Valley Civilization. If you want to know how this might have come about, look at the ancient Oxus Civilization which had Indus Valley and Yamna towns built close together and trading with each other. My take on this is that the Western coast was Ancestral Indian and they moved up the river valleys which were occupied by people of the Yamna culture to access raw materials for industrial manufacture and set up the Indus Valley cities on rivers to trade, mine, and process products for export to the Middle East and other places by sea. As in the Oxus, the two cultures merged and intermarried and became the modern Indian populations. The Indus Valley Civilization declined due to changing of the course of the Saraswathi river system, cutting off navigation to the sea, and only the minor part of the Indus Valley cities on the Indus river survived - explaining the persistence of Brahui in Baluchistan. The merging of the populations in culture, lifestyle and religion led to Hinduism, and the modern Indian culture. The claim that the R1 Y haplogroup shows that Indo Aryans invaded India from the steppe/Europe is debunked by the DNA evidence. There was a Yamna invasion of Europe which has been shown by DNA evidence. However this is not the case in India. There is no sudden change in R1 haplogroup in India that would indicate a sudden invasion. In addition the largest variation in the R1 haplogroup occurs in India, and the lowest in Western Europe, with Caucasian and Slavic DNA being closest to the Indian R1 haplogroup. This indicates the origin of the R1 haplogroup occurred in India and moved to Western Europe via the Steppe rather than the other way around. This probably occurred in two stages with Yamna populations moving into the steppes earlier, and then from the steppes to Western Europe in the transition from neolithic culture to early bronze age, and again during the bronze age collapse.

[@vikramgurung3043]

Brother you wrote a long line agreed..am north Indian east..but the Brahmin family in my tribe why they have blue,green some cat eyes..explain..also blond hair..suprise..

[@globanxiety]

So india was the first USA. damn

[@thatweirdintjkiddo6251]

@@vikramgurung3043 defined it's from Steppe Aryan also could e IranHG because of them having blonde hair varianta from Ancient North Eurasians

[@vikramgurung3043]

@@thatweirdintjkiddo6251 I am not archeological expert nor biologist but explain me Brahmins they call them self Arya putra,arayan..not Iranian but Russian Aryans their birth place steppe Rusia,look at Mahabharata serial they call themselves Arya putra.. Aryans belong to Europe..Brahmins I have seen have blue,green eyes some brown blond hairs..that's ain't Indian .are they..northern people more traits of rains..explain..

[@thatweirdintjkiddo6251]

@@vikramgurung3043 I got u brah you r a northeast Indian tribal but u confused how some Indians special Brahmins and other North indians got blue eyes? The thing is we North Indians have partial Ancestry from Iranian Hunter Gatherers (Caucasoid) population who mixed with AASI (East Eurasian core) tribals from Central India and created Indus Valley Civilization and later Indo Iranians (Aryans) migrated splitted from our slavic cousins and migrated to Indian Subcontinent and Iranian plateau during late IVC and they mixed with IranHG dominant people of IVC and gave rise to us. We own our blue eyes and somewhat light hair and skin to our Indo Iranian and Iranian hunter gatherer ancestors.

[@stardustnow4985]

Asia is Egypt, Turks, Arabs, Israel, Persia, India. It is India that is related to all. ALL the teachers of ALL the faiths are Asian because it was their spiritual history, their narrative which at the beginning had nothing to do with the Europeans, Africans, Orientals. Afghanistan, Pakistan and parts of Iran was India, it was not a separate ethnicity that came from the North, it was a Brutal faith Ìslam``. Sadly the Kings of Asia also brought in African slavery, and later the Portuguese brought in African slavery into South India. Th British came in as false friends and when India realized the `Sun was Set`on the empire nonsense. Sadly the British left India poor, her educated genocide, and her lands, power divided. The original faith of India was scientific. The west colonized currency and faith. You do not need to go through a European manipulated faith to love Asian Christ, his words like the Indian Prince `Buddha`s words were meant for everyone. The names, stories in the Old Testament are Asian e.g. Sarai, Amir, Shemi (Indian). Look up the Anahata Chakra, this was the symbol before any faith. Yeshiva/Yeshua was Jesus real Jewish Asian name, Jesus was given to assimilate with the Greek deity Zeus. Asia was a separate civilization which at the beginning had nothing to do with the Europeans, Africans, Orientals. Asia went corrupt `Babel`and was scattered, eventually it will be put back together and that will be Sanatan Dharma

[@urdeep01]

These are taken from some from some propagated source which seems to never even been validated. Mostly propagated from west. Just as you say the upper caste or brahmins are found to be genetically closed to europeans which itself comes from a pre-made assumption that aryan invasion is already true and higher caste were the once who invaded india. They will not specify whom they connected higher caste with like the once who were brahmins (who were priests, recite mantras, read scroiptures) if you would have then you will found south india which they call ancestral indian have more brahmins than north indians which are genetically close to european according to them. Even in south india there are huge amount of temples which even today are runned by priests, they have even villages which teach old gurukul system. It is ridiculous to put up anything on any pre made assumption and connect it with something else entirely. Even the word "caste" was introduced by europeans(mainly from brits) in 1800s. If you say that aryan were higher caste they invade ancestral indian what are the text that supporting it? what are the translation of "caste" in indo-aryan language at that time which aryans introduced in india? What did they call it? If you could not answer it, then only tell one reference of translation of word "caste" in any of indian subcontinental text before 1700s in any of languages used in this this region.

[@chetangawade5002]

DNA test in USA Christian Missionery Church ✝️🤣🤣😄. And Report print in British Court 🤣😄🙊

[@bigboss.800]

😂

[@manmohansingh8106]

Whatever the DNA may say , every Tribe in India , whether organised in a state or not,is its original inhabitants . What’s a Tribe- a linguistic group, a division of mankind from single linguistic group in the beginning,and settled all over the world in its own territories now we see. The mankind first separated to each other in group by differences of tongues, later also separated by division of Land into continents. Further later,due to fights between groups, enslaving of defeated one mixing of blood occurred. As Sanskrit is written in dev nagri lipi,which is no earlier than 600 years.

[@Kris_Stiletto]

Very informative; thank you for sharing. :-) Peace, Stiletto :-)