Indian Gupta Empire - Glory | Reaction

Come and join me in exploring the history of the Glorious Indian Gupta Empire and see my reaction.
IG: zuzanareacts
Original Video: • The Mighty Gupta Empir...

[@experimentnation3612]

There are so many empires and kingdoms in India who saved Sanatan Dharma from the oppressive and barbaric Islamic invasions and the British 🔥💪🏽🫶🏼🕉️🇮🇳

[@jakerkz]

The British were not even heard of them. All of the Europeans were hunters during this time.

[@arya3_5647]

🗿🗿🗿🛐

[@grve_wlkr]

Their was always a iron clad rule when ever the Bharatiya Kings fought. "Only the armies will fight each other" "The citizens will not be harmed" "The battle will stop when the sun goes down until the sun rises again" "After sun down The armies will tend to the fallen regardless of their affiliations"

[@Amrendra-Chauhan-Gurjar9468]

🙏🏼🙏🏼⚘️🌿Absolutely 💯.

[@Stoicx2k3]

Congratulations.. You learn 0.000000001% of Ancient 'Bharat' ..🚩🕉️

[@Medallionbexx]

🤣🤣🤣

[@zuzanareacts]

the way you treat others says a lot about the person you are. I hope you are very proud!

[@Stoicx2k3]

@@zuzanareacts "The truth is.. always bitter" and speaking of personality, there is a significant difference between social media and reality, and I hope that you treat all people in this way, you will earn a lot of respect. "And you took my comment statement in the wrong way... so that's your problem."🙏

[@planetofwonders7965]

​@@Stoicx2k3 she is trying to learn how the fu*k you added so many zeros as If you are a great intellect 😂😂.

[@zuzanareacts]

so your comment came across as very rude the way I read it. And I know very little but that's the whole purpose of this channel experiment to learn. I'd wish people encourage rather than discourage.

[@malganis2084]

There was no battle in the name of Vishnu or Shiva it's Just one's devotional choice. When Hindu kings faught they never touched villager, woman and children as well as no battles after sun set ( to respect wildlife which also sleep at night).

[@malindudissanayake7458]

Funny joke. How come Hindu King Raja Raja chola and his son killed nearly hundred thousand sinhalese civilians in conquest of Sri Lanka when they brunt down the 1400 year old city of Annuradapura to the ground. And even worse monsters like Kalinga Magha who genocided northern Sinhalese population to the point that they dont exist at a. 17 times Hindu Indian kings tried invading Lanka, 7 times they succeeded and destroyed the island and killed so many innocents. in the early 19th century the Hindu Vijayngara Empire took control of the island because male bloodline of Sinhalese monarchy died out and the new Indian Kings were so dam barbaric in 1815 Kandy Convention we willingly gave away our island to the British who were previously unable to conqueor us in exchange for getting rid of the horrible Indian Kings. You Indians were worse than even British, and you have the audacity to pretend to be all innocent.

[@ZackSparrow536]

Gupta Empire is also known as 'Golden age' in Indian History.

[@navyashrivastava393]

The Hindukush mountains were seen as a boundary to the Aryavarta or Bharat. Even though there were many kings in the region they had same culture and they all saw it as their duty to protect the whole Bharata present day afganistan from hindukush to the whole Pakistan and India. No one ever dared to attack the region Alexander was first to try he failed, it was huns who for the first time successfully launched a conquest to Bharata.

[@soumyadiptamajumder8795]

Gupta Empire was one of the most powerful Empire in history of Bharat and truly a Golden age of Bharat. Gupta Empire was founded by King Sri Gupta. It was strongest Military and economic power of Bharat after Mauryan Empire. The most Notable and strongest rulers of Gupta Empire were Chandragupta I, Samudragupta and Chandragupta Vikramaditya (Chandragupta II). Chandragupta I , Samudragupta and Chandragupta Vikramaditya all took the title of Maharajadhiraja. Samudragupta Defeated and Subjugated 12 southern kingdoms as mentioned in Prayagraj inscription. Samudragupta also did the Ashwamedha Yagya. Chandragupta Vikramaditya extended Gupta boundries toll India river in west and till Narmada in South. Gupta's has one of the strongest armies of that time and also well modernized army . Skandagupta of Gupta dynasty defeated the Huna invasion successfully. Samudragupta made 7 different types of Gold and Silver coins that were used as currency. During Gupta Empire, a huge number of gold coins were made. During the Gupta dynasty, India had trade relations with China, and with the Roman Empire. Sanskrit was on its peak under the Gupta Empire. It was the official language (the language of court) at that time. Nalanda university was established during the Gupta Empire, under the rule of Kumaragupta-I. At that time Ramayana and Mahabharata became very popular. During the rule of the Gupta dynasty, many temples were made. Dashavatara Temple of Deogarh, Vishnu Temple of Tigawa, and Temple of Sarnath were just a few examples. Architecture and sculpture development was on the peak at that time, temples of that time are the example of this. In Gupta era, first timebricks were used in the construction of Temple. Kalidasa, Vatsyayana, Harisena, Aryabhata, Brahmagupta, Vishnu Sharma, Bharavi all these scholars born in the Gupta era. Aryabhata also discovered zero and wrote his famous book Aryabhatiya in the Gupta.

[@zuzanareacts]

wow - thank you so much for sharing all of that, including your other comment.

[@anantbhushangaur1972]

During Gupta empire , BHARAT used to contribute close to 50% of global gdp.🔥

[@Your_real_dad]

35% bruh

[@anantbhushangaur1972]

@@Your_real_dad close to 50

[@hiicyuivbi]

​@@anantbhushangaur1972looted money can again be returned after 20 to 30 years,as india is progressing again But what about 9 million books burnt by khilji ,which contains detailed information about every kings

[@rishavkumar1250]

​@@anantbhushangaur1972no its not

[@aa10259]

Crazy 🔥

[@Rudraiya]

The European conquers never seen a war elephants before it was only in Bharat 🇮🇳🕉 that had thousands and thousands of war elephants with an armor. it's literally like a Tank💀

[@malindudissanayake7458]

Nope. Iran, Iraq, Syria, Egypt, Tunisia, Sri Lanka, China all had war elephants. India would even import elephants from Sri Lanka cause the Sri Lankan subspecies of Asian Elephant is the largest of its kind.

[@GG-pe4kz]

We had a continuous invasion for thousands of years from almost every Kingdom possible, maybe because we used to be rich but the biggest reason for our downfall was the lack of internal unity.

[@siddhantshukla8102]

Omg i cant beleive....just only today i was teaching my student about Yashodharma......he was a very mighty ruler in his own dynasty

[@experimentnation3612]

Before the Gupta Empire was the Maurya Empire which Defeated Alexander 🕉️🔥💪🏽🇮🇳🫶🏼

[@malindudissanayake7458]

Alexander died in 323BC in Babylon, and Mauryan Empire founded a year later in 322BC. Alexander never even met a Mauryan Empire cause it didnt exist at his time.

[@girdrache]

Crusade is between two religion but it's not religion used in war in India it's between kingdoms. They didn't wage war on god name. They where patrons of LORD VISHNU ie built more temple, travel house, etc in his name. Some Gupta where patrons of LORD SHIVA like king skandagupta.

[@zuzanareacts]

I appreciate you sharing!

[@contemporarymatters8106]

Huns were from a wide area up to Kazakhstan. The Huns you refer to in Hungary are the western group. The group which came to today's north-west India were an eastern group. I believe there were 3 groups of Huns which raided different directions at different times.

[@vanillagorilla.]

12:00 Noo, this is not similar to crusades, the wars were not in the name of "God". What he is saying is the different kings had different Gods which they considered ultimate and they drew inspirations through them and skeed their blessings for victory. Like the Gupta's used to worship Bhagwan Vishnu as the Ultimate, and the Huns which later adopted and merged into Sanatan Umbrella primarily chose to worship Shiva as their choice of ultimate. And it's important to note that there was no fighting because one kingdom wanted to impose their prefered God, because all gods were AND are worshipped by everyone, it's not like people who believe Vishnu to be the supreme don't worship Shiva or Bhrahma or other gods and goddesses, it's just matter of personal choice of what god they are drawn towards more and what school of thought they like. And also the reason why in the video he mentioned that there was high level of religious tolerance by the Gupta's towards Buddhism and Jainism is because they were not considered as different "religion" so to speak, religion as a concept is foregin to India. Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism..these all Indic "religions" are not actually religions but rather different schools of thoughts and philosophies under Sanatana Dharma, well they were atleast until they were all divided and categorised into different "religions" by westerners and anglos (Brits).

[@zuzanareacts]

Thank you for sharing!

[@navyashrivastava393]

The Huns attacked on India in waves they were savages and very brutal,Skandagupta a Gupta emperor protected the territories of Bharata (from the Hindukush mountains and the whole Indian peninsula) from the Huns. Later they carved out a territory for themselves in the region of Afganistan and later they reached to northern India where they destroyed the oldest university in the world The Takshashila university. Unlike Slovakia they did assimilate in Indian culture they later patronised one of the greatest mathematician of India Brahmagupta. Huns also built the bamiyan buddhas in afganistan.

[@thotslayer4949]

Difference is that they were remnants that lose third hunic war and hence werre assimilated. As in third hunic war they were driven out.

[@manojsinghbhati5319]

Actually the fight over here was not like crusades not any religious war as such couse shiva vaishnava shakti these classifications are just to identify the process of worshipping and ritual differences but never in bharat(india) the two kings may have worshipped different gods but they doesn't kill the peoples with different believe cause they also know the eternity is always their regardless of the different approaches they never destroy temple either of its shiva or its of vishnu or krishna or devi or any other deity

[@deWiAnNaEnEcBi3857]

Yes, actually Hinduism have total 5 division and their subdivision. 1) Vaishnav - primarily worship Supreme Lord Vishnu, 2) Shaival - primarily worship Supreme Lord Shiva, 3) Shaktiya - primarily worship Supreme Mother Goddess Shakti, 4) Suriyan - primarily worship Lord Suriya (the sun), and 5) Smarta - primarily worship Mother Goddess Shakti, Lord Ganesha, Supreme Lord Vishnu's many avatars and others....

[@deWiAnNaEnEcBi3857]

Actually Hinduism have total 5 division and their subdivision. 1) Vaishnav - primarily worship Supreme Lord Vishnu, 2) Shaival - primarily worship Supreme Lord Shiva, 3) Shaktiya - primarily worship Supreme Mother Goddess Shakti, 4) Suriyan - primarily worship Lord Suriya (the sun), and 5) Smarta - primarily worship Mother Goddess Shakti, Lord Ganesha, Supreme Lord Vishnu's many avatars and others.. But war between sanatani(Hindu) people are just a joke. In some areas it's happened, but not in all over India. It's especially happened in between two different division of Hindu kings not people. And war happened because of greed about kingdom not for any religious reasons...🙏🏽🙏🏽🕉️🕉️🕉️🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 #Supreme Lord Vishnu, #Lord Krishna, #Happy Janmashtami. Hare Krishna Hare Krishna, Krishna Krishna Hare Hare.🙏🏽🕉️

[@Namothegloballeader]

We exist because of our karma not from someone's point of view. 🇮🇳

[@Aryatva]

Ancient India and Greece was very much connected.Infact their Gods are also similar to Hindu Gods. The word India also came from Greek historians who described Bharat as India because of the Sindhu River which they pronounced as Indus river. Greeks are also mentioned in Mahabharat and said to have fought in Mahabharat war which lasted for 18 days. Edit: The land was given to Brahamans to not to rule,but open Gurukuls means schools.Brahamns used to do the teaching work.

[@SuryadevaraRammurthyNaidu]

One day while I am alive I strongly believe Bharat will attain at least 10% of its past glory. The day we restore this country back there will be none eligible to even point fingers at us. This time around we will be more careful to not let anyone easily as now we know how most of the world thinks. One day... one day for sure 🧘‍♂️

[@girdrache]

Bhramins are not like pope or preist . Most Bhramins are advisors and teachers not rulers.

[@sanketgawade87]

It is nice initiative. We would like to re-watch our history with you. Also you can make episodes on ohom, chola, Maratha empire etc😊😊

[@deveshnaik1366]

Guptas were not just Powerful and Economy builders but to tell a story Ramagupta, who preceded Chandragupta to the throne. Ramagupta decides to surrender his queen Dhruvadevi to a Shaka enemy when besieged, but Chandragupta goes to the enemy camp disguised as the queen and kills the enemy, tells lot about them

[@lovemsoni1844]

The horse is not sacrificed in Ashvmedha yagna as described in 4:30 bec its a sin in rig veda as killing every animal is a sin in hindu principles. They didn't led war for Vishnu but worshipped him as supreme being. They led war by same idea of Uniting India like Mauryans did. And there have been no war between followers of Vishnu and Shiva bec people here know that name is changed not Supreme God and though paths are diff but god is one. Dont relate christianity with Hinduism

[@zuzanareacts]

i was drawing parallels that I saw - I didn't say I was right or wrong - I'm curious about the opinions of Indian people.

[@coolraj1063]

Indian kings were the most fearless kings in the world which feared big emperors and kings from other parts and even changis khan to conquer his neighbor country , what if they worked together instead of just protecting the particular region, then invasions would have been a lot difficult then it was for the mughal as well as british Empire, ❤❤

[@gunasekaran7137]

Do search rajaraja chola and rejendra chola to know about South India Zuzana.... Lot of buildings still there in south as witness of golden era

[@Medallionbexx]

I can understand her confusion because the Dharmic understanding of what we call Parmatma, or all-pervading consciousness in Eastern cultures, and especially in Bharat, is the polar opposite of how they understand their definition of God. And since there is only one singular definition available, it becomes difficult for them to understand the millions of definitions and names we have for supreme consciousness. So her thinking that if someone worships Lord Vishnu and is attacking other kingdoms, which could be the worshippers of any of our 33 million gods or goddesses, then the primary objective of the former is to impose his god on the latter, is a very rudimentary and hilarious idea. I neither blame the narrator nor her for failing to understand that because most of the wars they have witnessed or read in their history for the last 1500 years are all about one Abrahamic God vs. another interpretation of the same God. They will have to acquire an Indian mind to understand our culture which only a few can do because there is not one single definition that defines our civilization.

[@zuzanareacts]

I appreciate you sharing and clarifying.

[@Animegamer7.0]

You saved me the time to elaborate. Thanks a lot... 🙏

[@mypackmypower1996]

Every thing you said is correct but one mistake Its 33 koti(that means type of gods) not 33 million gods

[@BOBON0101]

Zuzana ... been watching you since the day you started this channel and it's so fascinating to watch you morph into an Indian yourself over this period of time. Welcome to our Indian family and may god bless you with success, health, wealth and happiness for all days to come. 👍 .. Love and respects from an Indian dude, domiciled in Hong Kong.. 🙏💖

[@bo55man30]

Love your videos keep em coming :D

[@zuzanareacts]

Thanks! Will do! :)

[@phoenixj1299]

Huns are more like mongolians rather than Hungarians. Huns looked like Mongolians in appearance. The mix between Huns and easter Europeans are Hungarians. At present, the ethnicity thay resemble Huns more are mongolians. The second ethnic group that resembles Huns are Turks(not to be confused with people who live in Turkey).

[@zuzanareacts]

check out Attila the Hun and how that translates to Hungarians. Just because in your part of the world it was different -does not mean it was the same over here, if you know what I mean.

[@phoenixj1299]

@@zuzanareacts Sure I understand where you are coming from. Ancient Hungarians might have taken the identity of Huns but historically speaking, Hungarians never looked like actual Huns because Huns descended from Xiongnu tribes, north of China. Xiongnu looks like Mongolians as well. When Atilla the Hun invaded Europe, the descriptions of Huns were noted and it matched Turkic/Mongolian looking people rather than modern hungarian. Hungarians are like Modern day turkey people. People of the Turkey doesn't look like Turks but they call themselves Turkish. They took the identity of Turks. Modern Turkey people is a mixture of Europeans and Turks. Turks and Mongols looked extremely similar in the past.

[@zuzanareacts]

Yes - we all have evolved from old civilisations and their origins belong to the ones of Huns and trust me Hungarians are VERY product of that. I lived in Hungary as well for a while.

[@phoenixj1299]

@@zuzanareacts Of course. Another similar example of hungarians are Pakistanis. Pakistanis are nothing but pre independent Indian muslims. But their identity is based on Turks because of Turkic invasion of India. They identify themselves with them unlike Indians.

[@zuzanareacts]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huns

[@truthfinder8652]

Many Romans who really know their history, still call themselves as the ancestors of Ancient Hindus with sharing the same Gods.

[@user-ju9ii1hf3v]

Ancient Romans and Ancient Indians were good relationship There was trade and commerce between both and lot of knowledge skills technology experience and spirituality exchanging between them.

[@vinaykrishna7212]

please make more videos on indian history. I learn a lot from these videos. thank you so much for these videos.

[@zuzanareacts]

Thank you, I will

[@shasha0076]

It wasn't led in the name of lord vishnu. Video says he was devotee of ord vishnu n shiva. No indian king ever laid wars in the name of gods as most of them used to follow the same dharma🙌

[@_JP_7]

I really appreciate your choice of selecting topic.. Such History is core to understand the Glorious History of Bharat.. (I am sorry I am not good in english)

[@zuzanareacts]

your English is just fine ;)

[@_JP_7]

@@zuzanareacts thank you, trying my best to improve my english..😀

[@aman_s47]

Samudragupta, was one hell of a efficient ruler, conqueror. He defeated 9 south indian kings in one go and left all of them free to rule under his empire.

[@AkhileshSingh-or3hg]

Ne more interesting fact, in bharat there was a rule during wars, wars were actually duals in ancient bharat. So, during war a soldier used to fight with another soldier, a horse rider used to duel with another horse rider , a charioteer used to duel with another charioteer. I mean basically wars were not fought just to shed blood and win by hook or crook but there was dharma followed while fighting wars too. There is famous English saying " everything is fair in love and war", fortunately in bharat we believe that dharma i.e. ( following rules ) is part of our life.

[@j_j_4]

Wow, History! I know its your favourite subject Zuzana!

[@terror10gaming55]

There is a difference when you say Christian/ Islamic invaders waged war in the name of their god and Hindu conqueror conquered land in the name of god. The former once conquered/ invaded will impose their religion and god forcefully onto people with other beliefs . But in the case of the latter the warcry is usually the god's name ..... Like har har Mahadev .......most of the Hindu kings didn't impose religion forcefully onto other people .

[@zuzanareacts]

than you for sharing!

[@diablodelfuego6633]

Huns are not Hungarians. Huns were originally Mongols. They became more European as they migrated and interbred with Eastern Europeans. So it's more likely Huns became Hungarians.

[@zuzanareacts]

please check Attila the hun. Hungarians are descendants of Huns.

[@AkhileshSingh-or3hg]

There is a question you can take is as a hint, can you tell me that if you are living in a village with no facilities, then where are you likely to go to get all the facilities( in a city). That's what bharat was to all the world , a city, bharat' s presence was very vibrant. The most appropriate example is ' us' the people who are the part of this great civilization. There is hardly any civilization in the whole world which is still thriving to this date. Bhartiya civilization is world's oldest civilization.

[@AbhinandanABS]

This video doesnt tell that Samudragupta was a good son & a kind person. He did music & poetry. Helped the flood victims & conquered for his late father's wish. In our part of india we celebrate this ancestor

[@adityamukherjee7038]

What we know as Metallurgy today actually started in ancient India. India was a manufacturing superpower until the 18th century contributing to over 25% of global GDP and during the Gupta Empire, Indian subcontinent contributed to 50% of global GDP. Indian swords were famed across the world which later came to be known as the Damascus swords. When the renowned Chinese traveller Fa Hien visited India during Chandragupta Vikramaditya's reign, he wrote in his book *there's not a single poor person in this enchanting land.* Fa Hien's book bears testimony to what ancient India really was. We were a superpower for millennia until the ba$tard Brits looted us of everything, the most important being our culture and self esteem

[@zuzanareacts]

Love it - thank you for sharing!!!

[@adityamukherjee7038]

@@zuzanareacts you're most welcome 🙏🙏and I feel good when you constructively criticise us. It shows that you really love our country and want us to move forward. I as an Indian always take your advice and do my two cents to improve my country's situation further

[@MilkMocha56]

Sad thing is that tradions can be reclaimed, culture can be restored, art can flourish again, similar structure might be erected with skill and patience, history can be retaught, same education can be continued. But the knowledge We lost, the communities and local dialects & languages which perished during invasions and the burning of books which contained immense knowledge,more than half of which we don't even have idea what topic they were about, is lost forever. Everyday i wish i can turn back time or get chace for one day to retrieve as many books as i can. Because we know that whatever books and scriptures that we are left with, have informed about travels all over the world. If all those books were present today, we would not only know about indian but also about world's all civilizations. Because we already have books which talked about inca tribe's area, mount miru of africa, Turkmenistan, of frozen sea in steppes, of south east asia, islands of Indonesia, sunken islands east of maldives and west of sri lanka. So much have been lost. Including the record of family tree of kings from all over the world.

[@ZeternityEarning]

They did not fought on the name of God. They were just fighting to rule and their God were different. Interestingly, God Vishnu pray God Shiva and God Shiva pray God Vishnu😊. God Shiva is known as destroyer of world but people forget to mention that Shiv destroys negativity. He is the one who gave us the knowledge of Yog and Meditation and many more.

[@essee3984]

The Brahmins (The Priests) were also the scholarly class, for they had the knowledge of all the ancient texts that talked not just about philosophy and rituals but also warfare, strategies and mathematics. Hence they were also the advisors or consultants to the Kings. So, whenever a king would win a battle, he'd gift lands to Brahmins as reward for their services. As dynasties moved more towards the idea of currency and economics of trade, over time, it eventually created a wealth divide. It now meant that the Priests could hire peasants to work on their huge lands, or hire the warrior class to protect them/their land. As cities expanded, the tribals on the other hand couldn't find a fitting position/role in the societal structure of priests/warriors/traders/peasants and eventually became outcast.

[@aravind4090]

Wow great Information 👏🥳

[@bradpitt4561]

Why do you think so many foreigners like Columbus vaso de gama were looking for sea routes to india... every greek roman Portuguese British new the wealth of india...they wanted to directly trade with india....

[@Rorschach7012]

roman empire used to spent 100 million sesterces (10 ton gold) every year to purchase Indian products, Romans were slowly adapting Indian culture, somehow it stopped because some say because of barbaric islamic conquest, Romans adapted some Indian cooking methods and have more than 300 Indian recipes.

[@prince....yaduvanshi]

Happy Birthday Krishna ji 🥳🎉🙏🦚

[@SurajGupta_3D]

Hey .....My ancestors ❤

[@dailydoseofgaming3593]

We can't change history but we wish for a Good future of Humanity😊🙏

[@AkhileshSingh-or3hg]

Ant to tell you one intresting thing that during the Gupta period there was peace and there was no case of theivery.

[@technicalcyclist]

Old historians believed that Huns originated from Kazakhstan which is in today's central Asia. They arrived in southern Europe around 370 A.D. and started conquering one territory after another. Some recent updated studies on this subject reveals that Attila the Hun was born n grew up in a Hun community somewhere near north of Hungary in today’s Europe. So I have doubts if Atilla can be claimed as an European from Europe or a conquerer of Europe from Kazakhstan from central Asia. Opinion may differ. Learning remains 🙏 Please try to learn about Chandragupta Mourya n his minister Chanakya. This will fascinate you.

[@thotslayer4949]

Huns were pastoral war like Mongolian tribe. In eastern europe, tatars were also from same ethnicity.

[@thotslayer4949]

There wwre three indo hunic wars, first india won, second lost some land, third drove them back.

[@headhunter_nj1727]

Another great vedio about kings is 'the great ashok' by 'kings and general' .

[@zuzanareacts]

Thank you!

[@ggautamr4677]

Chandragupta II (r.c. 375-415), also known by his title Vikramaditya, as well as Chandragupta Vikramaditya, was the third ruler of the Gupta Empire in India, and was one of the most powerful emperors of the Indian history ..... THE STORIES OF THIS KING IS MOST CELEBRATED THAN ANY OTHER KING IN INDIAN HISTORY and also than any world kings..

[@kanishkkumar5431]

Vikram betal story is probably inspired from this ruler chandragupta 2 Navratnas and kaalidaas were contemporary to gupta empire

[@MiguelDiaz-zo7zc]

hunic tribe originated near lake baikal north of mongolia ( occupeied mongolian territory in russia), Huns are ancestors of mongol and turks, huns raided roman empire around same time frame when they were invading india in the east

[@gamblercity]

That's why Gupta Empire not finished in Bharat 🚩🚩🚩

[@samkupp1390]

Huns were not really Hungarians. No one knows exactly where the Huns came from. Some scholars believe they originated from the nomad Xiongnu people who entered the historical record in 318 B.C. and terrorized China during the Qin Dynasty and during the later Han Dynasty. Other historians believe the Huns originated from Kazakhstan, or elsewhere in Asia. When they attacked regions in Europe, they may have intermingled/intermarried with Hungarians and others. The Huns came on the historical scene in Europe during the late 4th century A.D when, in 370 A.D., they crossed the Volga River and conquered the Alans, another civilization of nomadic, warring horsemen. We don't really know their origins because they were either illiterate and didn't know how to read or write. In any event no material written by them has ever been found. Everything written about them comes from people who were either conquered or invaded by them.

[@zuzanareacts]

check out Attila the Hun - Hungarians are considered to be descendants of the Huns. We are taught they came from behind Ural - that is all that we are aware of.

[@samkupp1390]

@@zuzanareacts This the best answer on the Huns. kzbin.info/www/bejne/aXKxdZRnpbF1iLs

[@zuzanareacts]

The topic is complex from what I understand - when reading Slovak sources that are based on many different people who wrote about it. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huns.

[@ajatsatru3101]

According to the preson who made this video on our history, said caste system was impose by guptas on our society, caste system is a western concept, caste word is itself a Portuguese word. He mentioned aryabhata who discovered 0,number system, trigonometry, geometry, but According to present indian constitution aryabhata is considered a SC schedule caste or lower caste, so how come a lower caste person becomes rishi aryabhata and doing research on mathematics and new discovery in the field of mathematics. So the person doesn't know anything about indian history, just imposing a western template on us.

[@questions_answered]

The most famcinating thing is that the culture remains and even todays Indian flag has ashoka chakra and the government emblem is also of ashoka. And this empire existed in B .C

[@SuryadevaraRammurthyNaidu]

India flag colors and design is a replica of ancient Telugu empire

[@questions_answered]

@@SuryadevaraRammurthyNaidu ha

[@questions_answered]

@@SuryadevaraRammurthyNaidu sengol

[@SuryadevaraRammurthyNaidu]

@@questions_answered sengol is tamil, but both Indian and sri lankan flags are old telugu flags

[@xenzorygames4116]

there are two types of Huns the ones who invaded Bharat were Chinese Huns, not the Hungarians. but later after the Chinese Huns were defeated they became part of Bharat.

[@SHUBHAM_SINGH___]

12:08 both are completely different He didn't attacked those Kingdoms in name of Vishnu or any other God And also there were no killings of local people or conversion like what was common in crusades . Gupta Empire never killed innocents in name of religion or attacked them .the kingdoms he attacked were all Hindu majority and most of them were worshipers or lord Vishnu. And also there was no concept of religion in India at that time, there were 6 different schools of thought and 100's of different sects out of which now only Buddhism and Jainism are alive and Hinduism represents combination of all 6 thoughts

[@cpol1146]

*Correction - expansion of The Mighty Indian Maurya Empire. Bcos people only think that maurya empire was only upto afghanistan but that is factually wrong. Regarding Indian History,which unfortunately we r not taught correctly bcos of lost of so many information as libraries were burned by the Turkic invaders from Central Asia and with remaining information distortion was done by British which was designed in such a way that to make us feel inferior like Indians never went to foreign to conquer lands or there was hardly any pan India Empire and many things like these and later on it was continued and distorted more thanks to leftist. So the true extent of Maurya Empire is - Maurya Empire extended as far Egypt to Turkey to Greece in the west and in the north it extends to Central Asia to Western parts of China particularly Khotan region to other areas of China to as far Japan in the east. This was the true extent of Maurya Empire. Major Rock Edict XIII inscription clearly mentions about victory of Maurya Empire to as far Egypt to Turkey to Greece. And recently, an Indian statue of Buddha was found in egypt few months back. And Khotanese texts clearly talks about Maurya dominance over Central Asia and western part of China. And Ashok Stambh of Maurya Empires are still there in some parts of Japan, as these Maurya Stambhs were symbol of Maurya Empire dominance/influence. By the way Major Rock Edict XIII is the same inscription from which we get information regarding Kalinga War of Ashok but in the very same inscription ahead there is mention of victory of Maurya Empire to as far as Egypt to turkey to Greece. But these leftist historians ignore that. By the way the Chandragupta Maurya we all know is actually Samudragupta of Gupta Empire. This confusion happened bcos over 1380 years were deleted from Indian history in order to fit into biblical timeline of 2000-4000 years with other distortion. This is why ancient india is very confusing and not in a proper chronological order. If you read greek texts, they mention Indian King Sandrocottus, who defeated Greek Commander Selecus Nicator and established his dominance over eastern part of greek empire and the descritpion of Sandrocottus is exactly of Samudragupta. And both Indian texts and greek texts confirms it to be Samudragupta. By the way an extra info about the area of Gupta Empire was, Source : Prayag Prashshti Inscription - In the east it covered whole modern day Iran to Central Asia in the north to Sri Lanka in the south and South east asia nations in the South east and to Burma in the east. Prayag prashashti inscription gives clear information about Samudragupta and his military campaigns and how he fought more than 100 battles and lost none. Two Books I would recommend you to read - 1. Book : Bharat's Military Conquests in Foreign Land. Author : Venkatesh Rangan 2. Book : Chronology of India: From Mahabharata to Medieval Era - Vol I. Author : Vedveer Arya 3. Book : Chronology of India: From Mahabharata to Medieval Era - Vol II. Author : Vedveer Arya -> Book number 2 and 3, talks about missing years from Indian History. Over 1380 years have been deleted from indian History in order to adjust them to Biblical timeline of 2000-4000 years by British. Thats why there a lot of confusion fron the times of ancient Indian era to 12th century AD. Vedveer Arya have exposed that. And he has also given talks regarding this on KZbin platform.

[@siddhantshukla8102]

First.....Pls so smthng related to Krishna...its his bday tmrw😊

[@rishavkumar1250]

Yes, Even Augustus Caesar received buddhist missionaries ... At 13:53 You're describing Feudalism .... It was there in India as well .... Although most Indians will deny it and say india was an equal society which is false

[@MohanKumar-xx6mu]

The western conqueres confused seeing thousands and thousands of elephants which are trained for war and thar elephant knows the difference of enemy and ally😂😂 and elephant alone used to fight them event though the driver dies😂😂

[@zuzanareacts]

wow - I was aware of war elephants before - but now it really came to life for me.

[@poruskadesh8845]

Great history gupta punjab and north india gold era whole india

[@r.k.kalawat6257]

Bharatvarsh is a long story 🇮🇳🙏

[@earth4009]

There were no religious wars it is like a horse is left to roam and wherever horse goes the land comes under empire unless the local king wants to challenge and kills the horse of the empire if horse is killed then the king of that land stays independent but if he does nothing then it is understood he is under the emperor….. not wars in name of religion……. Religious wars are Abrahamic concepts not Indian concept

[@AbhimanyuSingh-yj5yq]

yes context is different

[@harshitgoswami160]

Did you know what Alexandra wrote in a letter he sent to his mother while fighting King Porus?

[@zuzanareacts]

I did not :)

[@mogambo1543]

Next you should do maurya empire

[@AbhishekG929]

Hans were not originally Indians they started following hindu religion only after the war after conquering........ The war was not in the name of Lord shiva though they started following Lord Shiva as their primary deity later on.

[@sanjuraja6976]

Bharat ❤

[@Atul__Maurya]

Do react to the maurya empire as well.

[@ishikabebortha3690]

Happy Janmashtami sister... ❤❤ Hare krsna🙏🙏

[@nikhilmalviya8018]

No u should watch the video again. The was was not for God but for conquest. They just mentioned that the Gupta dynasty was the devoutee of Vishnu.

[@PrabhatKumar-ng5zp]

Awesome 👍

[@zuzanareacts]

Thanks 🤗

[@sanatannews9238]

Make video about king vikramaditya Empire 🙏

[@DarshanDarshan-zm7mh]

watch for more history, "The unmaking of India" ###🇮🇳😔

[@no.1spectator39]

Check out the history of India Every year, i hope you find ot very fascinating and interesting, i myself as a india never knew we were ruled by Greeks, scythians, Parthians, Huns, turkic and mongol descendants 😅

[@zuzanareacts]

is it called History of India Every year?

[@tarunahir6599]

Martha Empire rule 75% of india 1720 to 1818

[@Bharat3.0mission]

I think you can pass our hardest exam IAS. you are reading so much about Indian history 😂.

[@ChiefJoey5971]

It was not in the name of God they worshipped vishnu it's very different, Vishnu is a hindu God and it doesn't mean that there were conquering to make people worship vishnu. I can understand your confusion but it's really different, people worship multiple gods here and everyone has a different god that they feel they are cinnected to. So basically they worshipped vishnu (one of the hindu Gods) just like anyone else would, but the the wats were for geopolitical power and expanding their empire. All of this is true for other Indian empires as well, I hope this helps.

[@Baba00100]

😊

[@gamblercity]

Do you know i am Gupta my name is su...t Gupta ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@RomitDholakia5]

Gupta empire was the last powerful empire of Akhand Bharat. After Gupta empire, the Islamic invasion started and then Britisher came. Bharat stayed enslaved for 1200yrs. No ancient temples are left in North India due to invasions.

[@siddhantshukla8102]

12:09 arent Crusades led against non believers?

[@pradeeprajput6356]

Crusades stood against the Islamic invasion of Europe by the Ottoman Empire.

[@zuzanareacts]

to convert people to christianity

[@siddhantshukla8102]

​@@zuzanareactsthen how will hindus convert other hindus into hindus lol

[@thehawkseye3412]

Eh in name of Vishnu is not exactly like religious war of the west. There were clashes among Vaishnav and Shaivaites but India had started the synthesis long ago. Gupta Kings had already tackled such issues and came up with concept like God HariHar (Hari= Vishnu, Har= Shiva) and started to enforce the idea that all gods are just different aspects or manifestation of the supreme. They actively promoted these ideas. One could choose the form they prefer, etc. Upanishads discuss god as the abstract entity and go in debates over the concept and nature of it. Hinduism easily allowed worship of Sagun ( with attributes aka idol) and Nirguna (abstract). With so many religious discussions and debates on going, it wouldn't leave much space to get many average citizens to get too hyped over it. Mihirakul could fight in name of Vaishnava but it wouldn't be that much of pull to masses as the religious wars in the West.

[@zuzanareacts]

I very much appreciate you sharing!

[@AtanuDebCreative]

Don't come for me🤣🤣

[@thethreespikes9737]

There use to be rules of engagements in war. No treachery. Citizens were left alone. Soldeir fought. Kshatriya Dharma was to be followed. One of the reason why India was defeated was because Indians were too much up in their heads about the rules of war. Outsiders did not give a shi*t about it.

[@Amrendra-Chauhan-Gurjar9468]

ZUZANA, please 🙏🏼 allow us to share the videos of youtube on your channel.

[@zuzanareacts]

Please do feel free to share them :). I only don't allow remixing.

[@phoenixj1299]

In ancient india there was never a war for religion. They treat all religions as equal. They had morals even at the war. There were no slaves. Citizens of a land are unharmed. Many kings and emperors considered themselves as servants of people. So the crusading type of attitude and behaviour is unheard of for them.

[@Medallionbexx]

There was nothing called religion in Bharat. Learn the difference between Dharma and Religion.

[@phoenixj1299]

@@Medallionbexx yep. There was no religion in Bharat. I used the term "religion" for simplicity purpose.

[@anandjaiswal6875]

India Bharat best king Ashoka The Great Gupta Maurya Empire Maharana Shivaji Empire first king of Bharat Jai Sanatan Vaidik Dharm ki jai Har Har Mahadev Jay Hind Jay Bharat best video reaction

[@aaa-lr1du]

Search for king lalith aditya..

[@aravind4090]

First 💖

[@thotslayer4949]

India is actually the only ones who have defeated huns, arabs and greeks which btw were the ones that were coming here razing central asia and persia, changing their religion etc. First war was won by skandgupta and in second they manage to have some land by at the time of mihirkula but in third war, indian princee drove out hun to central Asia and eatern europe. Arabs, ummayad calliphate lost and driven by india. Greeks were halted in india, it's controversial who won but in second greek war indian empire won.

[@thotslayer4949]

In fact islamic invasion were only able to make inroads in India after continuous struggle for 500 years. We keep defeating them for fucking 500 years from 7 th century to half of 11th Even after 500 years they were able to penetrate cause we didn't had one single powerful empire like gupta to Hund, Mauryas to greeks, Prathihars to arabs. India that time maybe due to constant wars struggle got divided into small States called mahajanpadas and it was easy to penetrate them as some of them started fighting against each other too. But even so india is so geographically huge that no outsider was able to occupy whole of India and there were always hindu kingdoms fighting against outsiders all the history. It was always a constant struggle. Later in 17 to 18th century indigenous Hindu maratha empire again reclaimed the land till afghanistan which they lost in third anglo maratha war after winning first too. Main reason I guess is because of constant war we didn't got time to consolidate ourselves and we didn't improved our military technology because we were so preoccupied and same with British they got vulnerable india to capture when we needed some time to really consolidate our power. And also when it comes to british they provided money and food too poor merchaneries that work in their army which indian forces couldn't. So those indian fought for british. People were just sick of war maybe for 1000 years, they needed break.