honestly, you are so great explaining things in a calm and neutral tone, makes me less anxious and feel like this stuff is attainable! thank you!
@InformingFutureDoctors2 жыл бұрын
I'm happy someone finds my monotony helpful!
@marshad.22573 ай бұрын
What an awesome explanation of question # 38!! Thank you so much. The AAMC and Princeton Review explanations just weren't enough for me.
@mcat108510 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for keeping the writing neat and showing all the steps!! It helps alot!! I just came across this channel and its been really helping me study. So thank you!!!
@RA-pu9jo7 ай бұрын
Killer video, realistic explinations
@kainaatfatima37232 жыл бұрын
Great channel and another great video, thank you! I was wondering if you would be able to make a video similar to your "HIGH YIELD PsS Material" video for organic chemistry?
@InformingFutureDoctors2 жыл бұрын
Thank you! That’s a great suggestion, may have to bring that series back🧐
@Valeria-uz2lb2 жыл бұрын
ahhh! Thank you for this! I also sent you guys an email earlier today, please let me know if you guys see it!
@nahomelion2 жыл бұрын
We love you to the moon and back
@InformingFutureDoctors2 жыл бұрын
❤️❤️
@nilanabijan3070 Жыл бұрын
The best tutor4ever
@sudeepgadde995510 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for explaining 31. I spent so long on that question, it messed up the rest of my exam
@medicalminutia11 ай бұрын
Around 07:00 , while following the radio labeled Carbon throughout the reaction mechanism steps, why does the carbon from the compound get flipped and go up on the solid wedge?
@nilanabijan3070 Жыл бұрын
Thank God u came back to organic, otherwise we would have lost such a wonderful tutor like u
@zainalaaroussi65282 жыл бұрын
For question 39, I believe it would be the oxygen with a negative charge that will attack carbon 5, which will lead to the structure in choice A. My thought process was that the carboxyl oxygen is more reactive than the alcohol group since it bears a negative charge. Although I know that resonance adds stability, I think I would still go with it being more reactive than a lone pair. Also, love your videos! You guys are great :)
@InformingFutureDoctors2 жыл бұрын
Love your insight, and thank you for the kind words! While that very well could be the case, I typically look at carbonyl carbons as solid electrophiles, that’s the only reason I picked the alcohol’s LP electrons as the nucleophile:-) Alcohols are electron donating, so I wouldn’t think their adjacent carbon would be as good of an electrophile (although I agree the full negative charge would be a better nucleophile) Oh OChem, how we love you🫠
@alextse92512 жыл бұрын
Ok note to future self: asterisks disappearing does NOT mean that all the labeled carbons have been completely removed by enzymes and that the AAMC is asking a question that is impossible to answer. I am a doof :P
@InformingFutureDoctors2 жыл бұрын
Hahaha that’s a new way to look at it ;-) I had a million dufus moments studying, hindsight is 20/20!
@ethan99068 ай бұрын
Thanks for the video
@MegaTiffanym Жыл бұрын
I really want to watch these videos, but I'm worried I'll know the answers before I do the sample test? Are these videos for this AAMC Cycle?
@InformingFutureDoctors Жыл бұрын
Yes these videos cover the AAMC sample test which doesn’t change. So what most students do is they’ll take one or 2 passages at a time and then come back here and review them with us :)