Insane commercial plane concepts we ALMOST got

[@cremipara1236]

found and explained should make a theory channel called "Find the Unexplained"

[@dxbid]

YES I AGREE

[@satokotsu]

or "lost and unexplained"

[@viridescent7748]

"explain the unexplained"

[@yaoyichenvictoriasch7014]

@@satokotsu More like Unfound and Unexplained

[@SumoSuperemo]

❤ the idea

[@GOAK_1]

Timestamps: 0:00 - Sukhoi KR-860 "Wings of Russia" 9:01 - Yakovlev MC-21 20:11 - Passenger AN-225 30:40 - Tupolev TU-404 (along with a quick summary of the Tupolev TU-304 32:17) 39:10 - FMA IA 36 Condor 48:42 - Fokker F-26 Phantom 56:22 - Baade 152 1:07:00 - Saab 1073 (along with a quick summary of the Saab 1071 1:08:38) 1:18:38 - Comac ARJ21 "Soaring Phoenix" 1:22:20 - Comac C919 1:24:18 - Comac C929 aka CRAIC CR929 1:26:00 - Comac C939

[@Insanelikewaffles_15off]

1:05 ryan air landing in background

[@InservioLetum]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@quattro4s]

I remember reading about the KR-860 on a defense magazine back in the day. Actually having the plane carrying the ladders would be much more practical because the aircraft could land even at airports that don't have so many jet bridges. The first aircraft that had a ladder was 727 and the first wide body aircraft with ladders was IL-86 which even had buggage drop off!

[@tegknox2694]

Exceptional content like this deserves exceptional production quality like this.

[@anlydaly5726]

YES!!! Congratulations on 200,000 Subscribers Buddy, you've earned it.

[@christopherhurley2570]

meanwhile in reality: Found And Explained / 717K subscribers

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

​@@christopherhurley2570l actually agree with you.

[@H4hT53]

Spot the IE user

[@pplesandoranges]

So you're telling me the KR-860 gets high on its own supply?

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

I actually cannot express how genuinely criminaly underated this channel and video actually is and this world and community actually genuinely needs more people actually like you in this world and damm.

[@Chorizo727]

Mustard is better

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

​​​@@Chorizo727yes but actually no and found a explananed is quantity over quality but as STALIN said quantity actually has a quality of it's own. mustard is 5star restaurant. Quality over quantity.

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

@@oxcart4172 l actually agree with you

[@VaultHoward]

How is 700k subscribers criminally underrated

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

@@VaultHoward 22h ldk

[@BethanyDukes-f5i]

This video has clarified so many concepts for me!

[@IluminousOne-9.7.2]

the Antonov an-225 one aged like milk

[@corpsimmons575]

The engine strike on landing in the first few seconds really goes to show why the KR-860 wouldn't have worked.

[@weldonwin]

And given the horrendous record of air crashes suffered by Aeroflot, I cannot comprehend the nightmare of a crash with 850-1000 people on board

[@machupikachu1085]

@@weldonwin or 200 000 pounds of natural gas exploding at an airport.

[@EastWoodGrap]

thank you for placing the thumbnail in the beginning

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

I actually agree

[@lilcoffeypot8982]

I think Boeing has more to worry about than the MC-21

[@aviator_1315]

1:05 i like how the plane landing in the background is crashing on the runway

[@tristantheobscure8505]

39:16

[@Raivo_K]

TU-404 - Error, Not found.

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

I actually agree

[@RedneckSpaceman]

That Plane would have been awesome!!! Those new Engines that GE developed recently would have been excellent for this!!

[@mrrolandlawrence]

the mc21-200 makes more sense. the SSJ100 is 70% foreign parts. the cost of resourcing that - its just cheaper to sort out the mc-21 and use it like the airbus a320 - a321 ... wil making servicing and certification easier too. no chance of fast builds. the tu214 is being ramped up.. .and expecting 20 per year... the carbon fibre issue is that the military get 1st dibs on supplies. commercial aircraft... way down the list of priority.

[@super_slav91]

First batches of indigenous SSJ's are being delivered now the last western one was delivered a month ago.

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

I actually genuinely agree with you and damm 1h ago on 1 day comment on Monday 21 October 2024​@@super_slav91

[@mrrolandlawrence]

@@super_slav91 what engines are they using? the PD14 for the MC21 is not even ready yet. Neither is the PD18 for the Tu214. Also with all the replacements from the engines to the rockwell colins avionics and landing gear + etc etc. When did it get its new type approval? if the SSJ is still in production, it is more likely using back channel parts acquisition.

[@super_slav91]

@@mrrolandlawrence PD-8, a small version of the pd-14, easy to produce, was always as a backup. Tested in 2022 and certified last year, units being placed on new SSJ's now, the avionics are pretty simple to replace as they already built the place with redundancies for domestic use. Everything is going to good simple metric again too.

[@mrrolandlawrence]

@@super_slav91 if all the avionics are all sorted then, then why are they still making the Tu214 with 3 crew layout? Surely that would be a simple job that could have been replaced years ago? Also if the SSJ is all ready to go, why the holdup on the MC21? thats surely the more important of the projects.

[@Sacto1654]

The Saab 1073 could actually have been a potential "player" had it got a decent high-bypass engine for the plane. It could have captured the market for small cargo transports that is now being carved out by the Embraer KC-390 but several decades earlier.

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

I actually agree

[@WOFFY-qc9te]

Look right to me I agree with you unfortunatly market forces snub out such designs. Reminds me of a Beverly !

[@DillontheTankEngine1]

KR-860 and TU-404, my beloved.

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

I actually agree

[@htimsid]

Just imagine how many seats Ryanair would contrive to fit into the An-225...

[@jmwoods190]

Or her unbuilt big sister- the 8-engined An-325!

[@VertyneOfficial]

1:01 Ryanair landing on the bg

[@IluminousOne-9.7.2]

I wish that some deranged billionaire one day builds and starts operating those planes... It's not like hyper-rich spend their money well anyway.

[@kylewitter2806]

I wanna see an offshoot of SpaceX called PlaneX 😂

[@IluminousOne-9.7.2]

@@kylewitter2806 maybe not that, all they do is make junk and promote it to get money

[@christianhoffman7407]

0:29 *Post Soviet Russian ingenuity* - There's a term I thought I would never hear. 🤣 Maybe these ingenuity types could help the Russian army or have they already been used as bullet sponges?

[@tsr207]

I would suggest that the statement "The German ME 262 and the emerging American aircraft" does miss out the Gloster Meteor (the first allied jet deployed during WW2) and served with the RAAF -the air force of the country which I imagine this channel author originates from.

[@Riley_Angeldog]

Ya should namee yaself Found and ExPLANEd with how many aviation vids u make :3 (Or make an aviation specific channel with that name!!) also: great vid

[@rieger.design]

Great video. Always fun even to watch again. Say, were those clips made with evvee or with cycles? Thanks

[@ronmaximilian6953]

Blended wing transports make some sense

[@sharoncassell5273]

So many choices. Too little decisions & money.

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

I actually agree

[@marhawkman303]

Blended wing passenger planes used to be a big deal for tourism stuff because passengers could look forward out the windows. BUT... that was a long time ago. Modern aviation... is.. mostly just whatever Boeing builds or the equivalent. The old era of innovation is lost science, and forgotten legends.

[@BOWUNCE6126]

would be funny to see a IAE V2500 or a CFM-56 mounted on a stretched model of that thing

[@sharoncassell5273]

All the concepts seem feasible but we need a team with money to create them.

[@nitehawk86]

There is no way the wings could fold like that. They would be able to store almost no fuel.

[@rdc1000]

The ‘Havilland Comet’ 😂😂😂. Did you not notice the ‘De’ in front of that? Just abandoned that bit of the manufacturers name completely then? (41.35)

[@sammcbride2464]

Nothing beats a GE 90X on the planet.

[@zsolteditor]

looks beautiful :)

[@sharoncassell5273]

If promotors develop these aircraft l will try them all to test them. Experimental craft are ok. They're innovative. We need them. I'm sad they discontinued many types.

[@chameemunasingheprasadika3944]

Bro....the rudder of thus aircraft tells "i'm a fat brother of my soviet military cousins"❤❤❤

[@badscrew4023]

Now, loading in full unloaded train cars would be stupid

[@Hykje]

5:57 An engine goes bye-bye.

[@H4hT53]

So the KR-860 would have literally gotten high on its own supply?

[@badscrew4023]

Glorious soviet aviation history - not sure you can call their civil aviation that. The most produced civil soviet aircrafts, TU-154 and YAK-40 have barely crossed 1000 airframes made each. This isn't really that many.

[@jaefarn]

The one who hates A310 A340 B717 Airbus Boeing Bombardier McDonell Douglas Embreaer Concorde Ilushyin Tupolev BAe Cessna Twin Otter Piper All Modern military and old and all tankers 👇

[@blahajgaeming]

MD 12 was the og cancelled a380

[@Bluemungusanimatesstuff]

That looks like the 747X concept

[@AddisonSmith-f7y]

Are you from Australia?

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

Yes.

[@AddisonSmith-f7y]

I referring to this KZbinr

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

@@AddisonSmith-f7y yes

[@spud4839]

I find it funny that Americas modo is go big or go home and yet Europe built. The massive planes 💀💀💀

[@christopherhurley2570]

'motto' (caveat: you get a pass if you're referencing old Italian, Spanish, and maaaaybe a reach for Latin... usages.)

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

​@@christopherhurley2570what?

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

@spud l actually agree with you and you actually couldn't have said that actually any better than me lol ❤😂🎉.

[@BoazLarson-jj4pg]

@@RADICALFLOAT_95 Y'all are forgetting the 747 and all those Lockheed birds.

[@dklm2023]

Hey, isn’t this the same plane as your first video on your KZbin channel

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

I actually agree

[@BoazLarson-jj4pg]

The engines on the first one are really low to the ground...

[@Cashier405]

YARASLAV! MAKE PLANE BIG VODKA BOTTLE FLY! DA!

[@_c_y_p_3]

If Ryan air starts charging for air in 2025. Thanks dude. 🙃

[@DeadChan67]

Pretty sure we have the ARJ21 already

[@RedTail1-1]

Maybe put compilation in the title...

[@samuelng9092]

747+A380=Sukio chaos A60

[@ilia9876]

Argitinian the first Dyson

[@pashapasovski5860]

Entire Detroit industries were saved by government subsidies, but you scoff at Russia and China evrytime you mention it! How many countries have the capability to build their own airliner!? Being independent from US-EU politics is a great thing for any country that doesn't want to be controlled by sanctions!

[@CandleWisp]

There was no scoffing. He literally just described what happened.

[@Kitt_the_Katt]

You know for a country that's not controlled by sanctions you're sure being controlled by a lot of sanctions right now.

[@AddisonSmith-f7y]

Are you planning to make more spinoff KZbin channel?

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

I actually agree

[@AddisonSmith-f7y]

@@RADICALFLOAT_95 and I for his land vehicle series, I think the pilot episode should be on c510

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

@@AddisonSmith-f7y l actually agree with you. DAMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM 5minutes ago.

[@Chompchompyerded]

The AN 225 is really a Ukrainian aircraft, not a Russian aircraft. That complicates things a lot. One of the most notable problems is that when Russia decided to invade Ukraine, they destroyed the only working version of it. Because Ukraine is constantly being attacked by Russian missiles and glide bombs, and because defending itself against a much bigger country has proven to be so expensive, the aircraft will not be able to be rebuilt, and Antonov will not be able to take on new projects until the war is over. If the war ends in Russia's favour, Antonov will be broken up, and any equipment and plans it has will be redistributed among the main Russian aircraft manufacturers such as MiG, Sukhoi, Tupolev, and Yakovlev. Of these, Tupolev will probably get the lion's share since a huge aircraft such as this would fit into its mission plan a little better. MiG and Sukhoi mostly build fighter jets, with MiG, Sukhoi, and Yakovlev also making a few "sport" and aerobatic aircraft. Personally, I hope that Ukraine will be able to keep its sovereignty, and that one day Antonov will again get to build amazing aircraft which push the boundaries of what is possible in aviation.

[@paperPlanesAVIATIONOfficial]

ARGENTINA MENTIONED RAHHHHH

[@jm01157]

5:21 Your North American friends appreciate it

[@664Marroquin]

Well i think that once you cut windows on it the weight will be reduce a bit

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

What.

[@maltheartistme]

so we could’ve got a ripoff 747 before… well, the entirety of gta itself?

[@WOFFY-qc9te]

52:08 The Fokker F26 Phantom would never fly, the wing is not good for high speed and the centre of mass from the forward hung engines would make for very doggy pitch control especial as the horizontal stabiliser does not have enough authority to pitch the aircraft into the air. The RR Nene (pronounced Neeen) mounted in a low nacelle (pronounced /nəˈsɛl/ nə-SEL) would not last long. De Havilland Comet was developed in house the R&D was shared.

[@christianhoffman7407]

1:24:29 Aircraft is a joint venture between China AND Russia. So essentially it will be a western designed aircraft. The domestic design team will actually be hackers and not engineers.

[@MaisistkeinGemuese]

Now I wonder how many Passengers could the biggest A380 carry, if it was configured for maximum Passenger Transport.

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

I actually genuinely agree with you

[@merafirewing6591]

Around 853 passengers. The Mcdonnell Douglas MD-12 has a capacity of 430 or 511 passengers.

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

@@merafirewing6591 2h I actually agree

[@Grassy478]

KR-860 - literal AN-124 but commercial

[@BoazLarson-jj4pg]

An-124 but Texas-ized

[@mankihonda983]

BIG BIRB

[@bbrenddon]

I reassure you good sir, due to recent events peoples attention is elsewhere right now, that's the explanation for the less views Either that or KZbin's hiding it for some reason

[@Spherz]

ADD. TIME. STAMPS.

[@UnitSe7en]

Russia took the "Refit" option in TTD literally.

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

I actually genuinely agree with you and wait what is TTD?

[@BobbyGeneric145]

No American or European airline would fly a Chinese or Russian airliner.

[@williamhilbert8324]

Been a long shit day aaannnd it just got good 😊

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

Wtf.

[@dilbert0815]

some project sections have aged badly

[@jaytnacks]

First, quite literally...

[@dinoman-space]

Second! But luckily I didn't have to wait a month! 😄

[@Noobpro9982]

3rd ig

[@Owlies_L1011]

4th

[@AiRbU380]

@@Owlies_L1011 5th

[@themalhotras1597]

158th

[@larrybanta8858]

Wow

[@garfellow5038]

‘But there was still would have been plenty of more room on board.’ Please proofread your scripts I mean Jesus Christ mate I’ll do it for you for free if you want

[@gordonprice695]

Russian ingenuity? Or vranyo?

[@ChessieSystem1973]

1:03 wtf is goin on in the background?

[@BoazLarson-jj4pg]

Pilots had too much vodka...

[@nathanstahlwirth4823]

ROFLMFAO!

[@BobbyGeneric145]

You are on drugs if you think COMAC will be a world player.

[@leezinke4351]

Wow!😯

[@GamingCodes.]

Cool

[@AbelMcTalisker]

Ahh..."The Russian government diverted the money to other projects." I think we all know what that means. By the way, how old is this video? While some of these Russian projects look like they might have some merit, the current war in Ukraine is a major elephant in the room when talking about economic viability, and it's never mentioned, suggesting that the video is several years old despite being posted a couple of days ago. Discussing the AN 225 is pointless as the only example was destroyed on the ground some time back thanks to the war.

[@stenic2]

Immagine the gas carrier version crashing….

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

With you inside.

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

With you inside.

[@slyderyder3491]

👍👍

[@christopherhurley2570]

47:41 -- look man, if you're going to generate your scripts, at least learn to pronounce the words. alternatively, write your own scripts with words you can actually pronounce, or at the very least - have a grasp on the meaning of. Alternatively and then some: this should be a drinking game, the sheer profundity of violently and virulently incorrect usage and abhorrent botched pronunciation is.... almost charming in a handful of extra chromosomes kinda way. Otherwise the content is always pretty awesome, just... have something proofread or proof-listen first.

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

I'm actually not reading all of that.

[@ace2ersatzhandy383]

Can you please stop butchering German names? "Wudsel-werga" instead of "Flugzeug-Werke", and "Messa-mitz" instead of "Messer-schmitt". Man, really.

[@Pshekich]

БМВ/ bmW

[@shmoocoo]

Maybe you make the video and you could pronounce whatever word however you want

[@Pshekich]

@@shmoocoo получается тебя устраивает и такое произношение, да?

[@ace2ersatzhandy383]

@@shmoocoo maybe someone who goes through all the trouble of making such a video shouldn't do a half-assed job and at least do a basic check on how to pronounce foreign names.

[@shmoocoo]

@@Pshekich English

[@Deebz270]

LOSE THE DAMNED BACKGROUND MUSAK... IT'S NOT TRENDY, RELEVANT, SERVING NO USEFUL PURPOSE OTHER THAN TO CONFUSE THE LISTENER WITH UNNECESSARY AUDIO OVERLOAD. UNSUBSCRIBING UNTIL YOU REMOVE THE 'SOUND TRACK'. COBBA!

[@kakavdedatakavunuk8516]

You have interesting videos but please let the AI read the names of companies and foreign people because you are catastrophic.

[@RamziSouki]

The narration is annoying and the video is all over the place

[@FoundAndExplained]

Its a compliation video. And i'm sorry my voice is annoying to you. I'll try harder next time to be more better sounding. But thanks for checking out my videos anyway :)

[@RamziSouki]

@@FoundAndExplained Your voice is not annoying, I meant the narration... the style and the tone. Thank you for clarifying that it's a compilation, I was wondering why it felt disjointed and that now makes sense. And thank you for taking the time to respond. I will definitely subscribe.

[@rohanrathore1994]

Background music is too loud..cant listen to dialogues..plzz correct in future videos

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

Yes but actually no. Skill issue.

[@Hi-Im-RubX]

Are you kidding me... it's a compilation. Why ?

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

I actually genuinely agree with you.

[@RobertKohari]

These F re-releases are annoying as hell ...

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

Yes but actually no.

[@321-Gone]

Narrator explains the real airplane would be much bigger. Than the static model. Thank you Sherlock..

[@RADICALFLOAT_95]

Yes but actually no.

[@Nino-v7u]

Weel... Ah hem! Unfortunately (30:20) Putin had taken care of the MYPIA or An-225 He DESTROYED the ONE existing plane in his attack upon Ukraine! I wanted to fly in her when she was still extant as she had 74 passenger seats (but no window seats, shucks!) That new 'Hitler' (Putin) had a missile shot into the hangar where the MYPIA sat and destroyed her beyond repair! What a TWIT (and that word is being too kind)!

[@necitasogena2803]

No way

[@InservioLetum]

"messur mitch" 😂🤣😂🤣😂