Inside Advanced US Megafactories Building Billion $ of Futuristic F-35 Engines

  Рет қаралды 1,932,349

Fluctus

Fluctus

Жыл бұрын

Welcome back to the FLUCTUS channel for a discussion about how the world’s most advanced jet engines are manufactured and how companies are making them more efficient for the future.
Fluctus is a website and KZbin channel dedicated to sea geeks. Whenever you are curious or an incorrigible lover of this mysterious world, our videos are made for you !
We publish 3 videos a week on our KZbin channel and many more articles on our website.
Feel free to subscribe to not miss any of our updates and visit our website to discover additional content.
Don’t forget to follow us on twitter:
/ fluctusofficial
Please keep the comments section respectful. Any spam, insults or troll will be deleted.
To contact us, make sure to use our email in the about section of this channel.

Пікірлер: 272
@KO-pk7df
@KO-pk7df Жыл бұрын
The F-35B does not have a vertical engine. The front Lift-Fan is driven off the one jet engine Pratt & Whitney F135-PW-600 via the Rolls-Royce Lift-System.
@glencrandall7051
@glencrandall7051 Жыл бұрын
Almost 100 years of evolution. Amazing progress. Thank you for sharing. Have a great day and stay safe. 🙂🙂
@TheMrgoodmanners
@TheMrgoodmanners Жыл бұрын
What evolution? We've had jet powered flight for more than 70yrs now
@j.fiminio
@j.fiminio 7 ай бұрын
As novidades tecnológicas, cada vez mais presentes . . . . 👍😀🇧🇷
@TheDustysix
@TheDustysix Жыл бұрын
The F-35B Lift Fan is Not a separate engine. It is Shaft driven off the F-135-PW-600 Engine.
@garymiller5937
@garymiller5937 Жыл бұрын
Pretty amazing things they do. I'm impressed.😊
@pitech4446
@pitech4446 6 ай бұрын
this is why USA is number#1, this is just one national security industry, just look at how many national security we have.
@robertojpaez9354
@robertojpaez9354 Жыл бұрын
Very impressive and nice the full electric prototipe Aviation Spirit
@SparklySpencer
@SparklySpencer Жыл бұрын
Hush Houses, NASA, and jet engines, fun times!
@HRHolm-bi6zu
@HRHolm-bi6zu Жыл бұрын
Man, would I have loved to have been a jet engine assembly technician with a career spanning, say, 40 years. Would certainly have earned good pay with a solid retirement fund accumulation at the end.
@rael5469
@rael5469 Жыл бұрын
"good pay with a solid retirement fund accumulation at the end." Don't bet on it. The aviation industry is a wretched hive of scum and villainy. Tens of thousands of lives have been destroyed by robber baron corporate thieves. I hate to say it. I wish it were otherwise.
@ChinaChuck
@ChinaChuck Жыл бұрын
My dad worked for Lockheed Martin over the course of 42 years. However, he was laid off three times, one of those long enough that he felt like an unwanted burden upon the family and contemplated suicide to help us. Fortunately a job at Siemens came available at just the right moment. Praise God! Dad finally retired with credit for 29 years. PS: He retired while the F-22 was wrapping up and I loved the rare opportunity to tour the factory. I was amazed how big the engines are on both the F-22 and F-35.
@HRHolm-bi6zu
@HRHolm-bi6zu Жыл бұрын
@@ChinaChuck Glad it worked out well for him in the end. "Looks Like He Made It."
@Chris_at_Home
@Chris_at_Home Жыл бұрын
I worked on the assembly floor of P&WA a couple of years in the late 1970s. It was a cool job with good pay and benefits. I did well there Electronics was my thing and I quit. I was an avionics tech on P-3 Orions in the Navy. I was making over 3 times what I made at P&WA in a couple years doing electronics work in Alaskas oil field. I retired from AT&T doing communications along the pipeline and working a gateway satellite earth station. My oldest brother was the 3rd generation to retire from P&WA. My dad worked on a rocket engines in W Palm Beach in the early 1960s and then on the Apollo fuel cell in Connecticut. Heck, my best friend growing up ended up a manager in engineering. He had a degree in metallurgy.
@gerardosalazar161
@gerardosalazar161 Жыл бұрын
Why didn’t you? What happened?
@vocaloiddownloader6461
@vocaloiddownloader6461 Жыл бұрын
試作機じゃなく量産する為の工場には膨大な資金と職人的人材要るんだろうな…て感じる
@barrysrcdump3557
@barrysrcdump3557 Жыл бұрын
I thought the F-35 had a single engine and a shaft drive to the forward lift fan, through adjustable clutches. Silly me. 🤷‍♂️
@SuperSaiyan3985
@SuperSaiyan3985 11 ай бұрын
LOL no you’re exactly right, the video’s wrong.
@javierjavier-ht3yu
@javierjavier-ht3yu 10 ай бұрын
interesting way to explain how works a plane engine , despite I´ve never flying on a plane.
@user-vb5sr7hf5y
@user-vb5sr7hf5y 10 ай бұрын
It's crazy how many parts the engine has.. Hush Houses, NASA, and jet engines, fun times!.
@Istandby666
@Istandby666 11 ай бұрын
I was at Edwards Air Force Base during the testing of this aircraft. The reason the 35 was built, was to give the u.s. a plane they could sell. The technology on the 22, is still top secret and when it goes out of service, it will still be top secret. The closet plane today to the 22 is the B-21. If you still think these aircraft are advanced, you should have seen what was being developed in the early 90's.
@HonISfirE
@HonISfirE 6 ай бұрын
early 90's? any example?
@asadbhuiyan5719
@asadbhuiyan5719 Жыл бұрын
❤God bless USA,, and respect ❤, Great job
@benz9063
@benz9063 Жыл бұрын
hope the overheating issue is not going to affect the new units produced.
@sarcof3459
@sarcof3459 10 ай бұрын
It's crazy how many parts the engine has.
@spankflaps1365
@spankflaps1365 Жыл бұрын
A billion dollars for the engine, then a billion dollars for a landing strip that can withstand the heat, then another billion when it sucks in a bird.
@gbengaajayi6462
@gbengaajayi6462 Жыл бұрын
😆😩
@winstonpoplin
@winstonpoplin Жыл бұрын
A Boeing 747's engine can cost from 700,000 to 1.5 million. Nowhere close to a billion. And one of these engine can suck in many small birds with no issues. Though larger birds like geese can cause a problem but that is very rare.
@nate4745
@nate4745 Жыл бұрын
A billion dollars ain't worth that much anymore. It's not only the engine costing more but also the dollars having less value. It's called 'Inflationary Spending'. If a thing costs a dollar and the government doubles the amount of dollars in circulation, that thing will cost two dollars.
@xiaoleicao5534
@xiaoleicao5534 9 ай бұрын
大国工匠,文明的起源
@SuperSaiyan3985
@SuperSaiyan3985 11 ай бұрын
That is not a vertical engine on the F-35B. It’s called a LiftFan and it’s powered directly by the engine’s torque.
@abdulmuas8423
@abdulmuas8423 9 ай бұрын
p p
@abdulmuas8423
@abdulmuas8423 9 ай бұрын
p 😊
@abdulmuas8423
@abdulmuas8423 9 ай бұрын
0😊😊 p
@abdulmuas8423
@abdulmuas8423 9 ай бұрын
l0😊
@abdulmuas8423
@abdulmuas8423 9 ай бұрын
p ppp 0
@Bergondora
@Bergondora 10 ай бұрын
At 1:54 it's not even mentioned that the fan at the front generates most of the thrust. Also the turbine stages after combustion seems to be described as a compressor.
@jijaji5363
@jijaji5363 Жыл бұрын
Yes definitely I enjoy your videos always tnxxxx from India 🇮🇳 ❤
@Clonefiles
@Clonefiles Жыл бұрын
Top f35 fighter jets us military ☝
@user-xy5ho7yt6h
@user-xy5ho7yt6h 7 ай бұрын
تجمع من دول المانياء وروسياء السباقتا لهذا الاختراع والتصنيع
@namvu1472
@namvu1472 11 ай бұрын
Ok 🥰 thật kinh khủng cho nhà máy rất tiện tiền ok 🥰 rất tuyệt vời
@HartsPerformance
@HartsPerformance Жыл бұрын
I get to test the f135 engines here in Oklahoma. They are pretty insane in person. Getting up close to all the machining and engineering on each part is amazing. Not all your facts were correct tho. Still a great video none the less
@TheMrgoodmanners
@TheMrgoodmanners Жыл бұрын
They aren't that amazing. The f16, f18 and certainly f15 have better engines. Whats so mesmerizing abt this plane?
@benoitlaferriere8581
@benoitlaferriere8581 Жыл бұрын
Dependable engines
@forzaelite1248
@forzaelite1248 Жыл бұрын
​@@TheMrgoodmannersthey make more power than the engines in any of the aircraft you just mentioned, and in the case of the Hornet it makes more power than its 2 engines and ties with the Super Hornet's improved twin engines. It's not even a completely bespoke design, having sourced from the F119 and still manages to power both the aircraft and numerous systems onboard that would likely fry legacy fighters trying to run them.
@timmainson
@timmainson Жыл бұрын
@@forzaelite1248 Well said. this. engine is the evolution of the F119 and proud to be so. The difference in performance between the F-35 and. F15 stem from differences. in aerodynamics and USAF changes in doctrines.
@terryingram7419
@terryingram7419 10 ай бұрын
You get to test F 35 engines you must be at Tinker I used to work on TF 30- P109
@user-cd9wj1hg6b
@user-cd9wj1hg6b 4 ай бұрын
與日本新型引擎相比,直徑超過2m,新引擎裝在1m內,推力11噸,4倍直徑,推力14噸,4倍直徑,平方直徑是4倍,日本新開發的引擎推力11噸,直徑1米,重量2噸左右,雙發22噸總重4噸左右,有70%的推力國外發動機70%的14噸推力有10噸左右,22噸vs國外70%發動機15.4噸,日本產4噸左右,((日本發動機輕了11.4噸)滿載11.4多噸的武器、彈藥、飛彈、燃料等。戰鬥機的耐用性是由其續航時間決定的。戰鬥機之所以能像日本一樣使用15年到30年甚至更長,日本擁有精確製造的技術超小型精密零件和超大型零件。
@bayramtekin5656
@bayramtekin5656 Жыл бұрын
Ne varsa teknolojide var, her alanda, gozunu seveyim teknolojinin, teknolojiye zamaninda ayak uyduran aya uydurmayan yaya kalmaya mahkumdur bu her alanda boyle,
@nelsonalmeida3979
@nelsonalmeida3979 Жыл бұрын
Muito bom as informações
@Rodrigo_Lima445
@Rodrigo_Lima445 Жыл бұрын
awesome logistics!
@timmainson
@timmainson Жыл бұрын
This is a rehashed style of 16mm films we would watch in Jr.High.
@esatozcubuk4530
@esatozcubuk4530 Жыл бұрын
En ufak hataları olduğunda düşerler, hiçbir riske giremezler ve takip edilen bu felsefenin de ağır bir bedeli var. Bu arada, bazı şeyleri bu felsefeyle asla üretemeyecekler.
@workhardandneverstop3184
@workhardandneverstop3184 Жыл бұрын
Üretmedikleri ne kaldı ki zaten
@sultonisimorangkir1303
@sultonisimorangkir1303 Жыл бұрын
Thankyu for sharing ,thankyu for genius Enginearing Turbine
@davewilkirson2320
@davewilkirson2320 10 ай бұрын
Enjoyed it. Very well done.
@BrianFitzGerald-TheSkySurfer
@BrianFitzGerald-TheSkySurfer 3 ай бұрын
You state that the F-35B VTOL model has an engine behind the cockpit that "points up" in addition to its propulsion engine. That is not correct. The F-35 has ONE engine that drives a ducted fan for vertical takeoff.
@VoTrongSang
@VoTrongSang 9 ай бұрын
Looks great everyone 😍
@Ali_Ercan
@Ali_Ercan Жыл бұрын
I have enjoyed the video. Thank you..
@MarioSergioSantosOliveira
@MarioSergioSantosOliveira 6 ай бұрын
😮😮😮
@RazelDiel-vh9tp
@RazelDiel-vh9tp 7 ай бұрын
Slightly interested
@holywells
@holywells 10 ай бұрын
Electric aircraft ?? Imagine the weight of the battery pack, even for lightweight aircraft!! Pilot to tower: "I'm declaring an emergency!" Tower: "What's your problem?" Pilot: "My batteries are dead!!"
@nikspanakis
@nikspanakis 10 ай бұрын
Or "This is your Captain speaking. Passengers with fully charged phones are kindly requested to connect your phones to the connectors under your seat. Apply to flight personnel for more information, but for God's sake, do it fast "
@ervandadamyan5222
@ervandadamyan5222 10 ай бұрын
I really liked the video👍amazing technology . 😎
@thusuongtranthi334
@thusuongtranthi334 Жыл бұрын
Người ta phải làm nhà để cất máy bay lúc không sử dụng.. vì chuột và dan sẽ chui vào căn dây điện và làm tổ trong máy bay.
@johnjr3870
@johnjr3870 Жыл бұрын
Jet engine do not have 1000s of moving parts, some assemblies have 100s of parts, but operate as a unit. The F35 does not have a front vertical engine, it has a "FAN" driven off the main engine
@shannonjurgens3667
@shannonjurgens3667 Жыл бұрын
Modern engines do indeed have a thousand moving parts. Just the IGV system alone has several hundred.
@bountyhuntermk2520
@bountyhuntermk2520 Жыл бұрын
Keep the noise down little man
@forzaelite1248
@forzaelite1248 Жыл бұрын
​@@shannonjurgens3667that seems a bit much, afaik the moving parts of a jet engine are usually just the turbines which total up to two or three spools; I guess the compressor/turbine blisks count up to 10-15 or so if you count them unless you're referring to all the fuel/oil valves. Technically speaking, engines like ramjets and scramjets have no moving parts at all
@ar-visions
@ar-visions 11 ай бұрын
if a part A is attached to a rotating part does that make part A moving?
@johno9507
@johno9507 10 ай бұрын
What about the fuel control unit, pneumatic starter, hydraulic pumps, oil scavange pumps, pressure pumps, pressure reducing shut off valves, check valves, thrust reversers, dynamic seals, Intergrated drive generators, dedicated alternator, fan air valve, gear box...how many moving parts do they have...and yes I fix jet engines.
@user-ik1rr5lx2e
@user-ik1rr5lx2e 3 ай бұрын
A temperatura do leizer quebra as moleculas e as matérias que tão jumto com as moleculas na fremte quebra as partícula evitá que as turbina aquece e eliminado os gazes quebrando as matérias e os atumo não tem limite de rotação a velocidade acima da velocidade da luz bilhão de vezes
@ioanbota9397
@ioanbota9397 Жыл бұрын
Realy I like this factory so much
@kjh71717
@kjh71717 4 ай бұрын
외계인을 잘 고문했네
@howtousemetallathemachines6478
@howtousemetallathemachines6478 10 ай бұрын
Excellent , Thank you👍
@airgaborpara3824
@airgaborpara3824 Жыл бұрын
Nonstop military spending but the budget deficit is over 35 trillion dollar. Moneyprinting is mad in USA. Destroys the whole market soon. 2008 was a light crash
@ProxolodRu
@ProxolodRu 2 ай бұрын
Очень красивый двигатель
@tanpengjoo7205
@tanpengjoo7205 10 ай бұрын
MADE IN USA ALWAYS MOST ADVANCED N POWERFUL. IF ITS NOT THE MOST ADVANCED THEN IT WONT BE NAMED AMERICA. JUST ASKED HOW MANY COUNTRIES IN THE WORLD ARE FLYING MADE IN USA AIRCRAFT, EVEN THE RICHEST OIL COUNTRIES MUST BUY AIRCRAFT FROM AMERICA.
@md.jahangiralam1509
@md.jahangiralam1509 10 ай бұрын
Very much interested in looking into the machine like aircraft engine, If I could be an aeronautical engineering part....
@bengkels2m577
@bengkels2m577 Жыл бұрын
Impressive work....
@BigEightiesNewWave
@BigEightiesNewWave 5 ай бұрын
RR had the oil stub-pipe problem and PW had the exploding combustor cans problem. I prefer GE. YES, I watch a LOT of airplane disaster videos. Planes are only as safe as the worst mechanic to work on it, and as dangerous as the airline that cuts corners, and refuses to grease parts like the jack-screws.
@ahmedzakarya306
@ahmedzakarya306 7 ай бұрын
We need this❤❤🇪🇬👍💪🇱🇷🇱🇷
@Sathyanarayana143IshwarB-mh8zr
@Sathyanarayana143IshwarB-mh8zr 7 ай бұрын
Al Fida Jummah Jummah Mubarak To Entire Globe 🌍 All Nation's Proud Pride Electric ⚡ Aircraft Manufacture Industrial Engineering Factories We Are Remembering Your Soul's Service And Sacrifices Love And High Respect From Al Lal ❤❤
@Pixx4you
@Pixx4you 10 ай бұрын
The engine is the star of the show..!
@user-qk4ey3qt8q
@user-qk4ey3qt8q 11 ай бұрын
버너토오치사출부분설계좋다
@mike.47
@mike.47 Жыл бұрын
Not sure how the F35 jet engine can be called futuristic when it’s in production and has been for quite some time.
@user-ih1pm6hm1y
@user-ih1pm6hm1y Жыл бұрын
Cuz "futuristic" to all countries except USA.
@TheMrgoodmanners
@TheMrgoodmanners Жыл бұрын
I just dont get what all the hooplas abt with this plane. its especially coming from Americans. They have some other magnificent aircraft compared to this
@lisaroberts8556
@lisaroberts8556 Жыл бұрын
The Engine System for the F-35 has been updated several times. What it is today has changed dramatically from it’s conception in the 90’s
@StewartWalker-hy1eo
@StewartWalker-hy1eo 11 ай бұрын
Especially when the UK played a major roll in the development of this engine
@xuanoantong3771
@xuanoantong3771 11 ай бұрын
Mỹ giỏi thế mà vẫn thua Việt Nam? Bị Việt Nam đánh cho tan tác buộc phải cút về nước. Mình thấy Mỹ mới chính là kẻ hay gây hấn, hay đi đánh các nước yếu.
@user-eo4xt2ov5e
@user-eo4xt2ov5e 9 ай бұрын
Sekomplek itukah mesin pesawat terbang atau mungkin sengaja dibuat rumit agar tidak ada yang meniru.
@mustafaibrisevic7492
@mustafaibrisevic7492 10 ай бұрын
Aferim za tehnologiju.
@electricsbangla
@electricsbangla 3 ай бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤
@sherzaman550
@sherzaman550 Жыл бұрын
Good but its goodness should not be limited it should reach to All of the humanity and to All of the living species,
@xXNURBSXx
@xXNURBSXx Жыл бұрын
Future looks so bright.
@ruk2023--
@ruk2023-- Жыл бұрын
Hundreds of moving parts? At most a jet engine has 5 moving parts, some people would say 1.
@faikerdogan2802
@faikerdogan2802 Жыл бұрын
🤡
@93200Jonas
@93200Jonas Жыл бұрын
Show us the engine secret F35 please 🤓🧐🇨🇵
@brahmburgers
@brahmburgers 10 ай бұрын
Is there a cooler job, than being a test pilot on that electric motor driven plane (shown at the end of the video)?
@Liujun-mt6qu
@Liujun-mt6qu Жыл бұрын
我擦!!这么粗?和客机的差不多了!这还是战斗机的发动机吗?难怪开加力才一点多的马赫数!!
@user-rt1jk3mj9d
@user-rt1jk3mj9d Жыл бұрын
F35のエンジンは一個、それが故障すると終わり、やはりエンジンは2個いります😂
@NnNn-cr5ed
@NnNn-cr5ed 8 ай бұрын
Okครับ
@tallywhacker1
@tallywhacker1 Жыл бұрын
The F35 engine costs a whopping $19.7 million and costs $38k per hour to fly.
@forzaelite1248
@forzaelite1248 Жыл бұрын
Source? I can't find engine costs for the F135 anywhere online but the latest CPFH from the DOT&E iirc is $33k
@abd5414
@abd5414 Жыл бұрын
The fighter jet?
@user-qk4ey3qt8q
@user-qk4ey3qt8q 11 ай бұрын
축복이있으라
@davidwhiteley3879
@davidwhiteley3879 10 ай бұрын
There are many kinds of air breathing engines - this is not unique to jet engines. Also, factories primary function is to make and assemble. The things they design are not engines but are items associated with making and assembling the engines.
@musaaq.12
@musaaq.12 10 ай бұрын
Luar biasa..👍
@ksdw5180
@ksdw5180 Жыл бұрын
😎🔥
@ronaldkiplagat6034
@ronaldkiplagat6034 Жыл бұрын
Do they test every engine they manufacture?
@oscarkanstrup5914
@oscarkanstrup5914 Жыл бұрын
I think for the price of the engines and the small amount used and manufactured they probably run tests on every engine also considering a mistake could be a one time mistake since it is made by humans and also considering the chance of the engines failing mid flight is to dangerous so if the manufacturer doesn’t test it the buyer definitely will
@danwarnick1283
@danwarnick1283 Жыл бұрын
"Acceptance Test" is considered a part of production and is SOP in most cases. They do this of course to ensure any post-assembly issues are caught and remedied before delivery to any customer. Acceptance Test also establishes a baseline for an engine that can be used to project out maintenance planning into the future. There's a lot more to it than just that, but that is the gist of it.
@rael5469
@rael5469 Жыл бұрын
"Do they test every engine they manufacture?" Yes !
@RyanPlate
@RyanPlate Жыл бұрын
5:11 Did they really just say "...the organization's smegma pulse..."??
@danwarnick1283
@danwarnick1283 Жыл бұрын
"Snecma Pulse". Snecma of France (Villaroche) was the original 50/50 partner with GE for the CFM56 series engines. Snecma is now Safran and they remain strong partners for the CFM56 (50/50 is pretty strong, right?) and lesser partner for a number of other engine collaborations. Safran, is their name now and they also produce other, standalone, engines themselves.
@EagleFighterJet
@EagleFighterJet 5 ай бұрын
I'm impressed
@sharaddhabudade5776
@sharaddhabudade5776 10 ай бұрын
Like yeah it creates more power to fly though what you think
@sherwinsalvatori6997
@sherwinsalvatori6997 6 ай бұрын
Jet/gas turbines engines has fewer moving parts compared to reciprocating piston engine
@omerbayindir3997
@omerbayindir3997 Жыл бұрын
MİLYAR DOLARLIK...? TRİLYON DOLARLIK OLMASIN....::::))))))
@GlenDoer-gq1rs
@GlenDoer-gq1rs 10 ай бұрын
Germany had axial flow jet with Ab in 39 lucky for us Hitler like giant machine and was technically incline..Why the Poms went for Radial compressor is beyond me.
@fiseliaa7105
@fiseliaa7105 10 ай бұрын
dobel turbin.canggih
@Jothishayamantharaadawiya
@Jothishayamantharaadawiya Жыл бұрын
👍👍❤️❤️
@zeroonetime
@zeroonetime 2 ай бұрын
QM = The Eternal Now T.E.N. dimensions. 010 Creation Evolution Entropy = Thought Thinking
@htprimeaux8570
@htprimeaux8570 10 ай бұрын
300,000 hours between overall can’t possibly be correct. Maybe 30,000 hours?
@BigEightiesNewWave
@BigEightiesNewWave 5 ай бұрын
Gimme a B777 with GE-90s😍
@imransharif443
@imransharif443 11 ай бұрын
Very best Engine nice Engineering
@D-One
@D-One 2 ай бұрын
This sounded normal at 2x speed.
@company6676
@company6676 Ай бұрын
thank you❤❤
@alexandershaw2378
@alexandershaw2378 Жыл бұрын
It's all fun and games until that electric plane receives a wing strike from lightening and its batteries are fried... *laughs in Jet fuel* Some things although innovative and cool, pose an unnecessary risk to integrate it as an industry standard. I for one will not be flying on any electric-powered planes if I am still alive by then.
@billakers6082
@billakers6082 Жыл бұрын
Nor fly an airline that has hiring practices of diversity over skill and ability.
@twisterwiper
@twisterwiper Жыл бұрын
Do you know how much a modern plane relies on electronics already? A battery will not add any risk that is not already there.
@billakers6082
@billakers6082 Жыл бұрын
A Boeing 787 is mostly electric, flaps, landing gear and most all of the major systems that were handled by hydraulics and pneumatics in older aircraft. Engines powered by electricity in transport category aircraft is another matter. Transport category aircraft are designed to take a lightning strike without major damage, I've had seven.
@mark-1234
@mark-1234 Жыл бұрын
On a side note, the push for EVs completely ignores the fact that it'll create a huge demand for lithium and cobalt. If you want to call that "sustainable," go check out the conditions and processes involved in those respective mines. (I warn you, it's not for the faint of heart.) The issue I have with environmentalists is most of them are clueless to the processes involved so all they really accomplish is exchanging one source of pollution for another, or moving the offending substance or industry to another country. Then they pat themselves on the back because they believe they're "saving the planet."
@h8GW
@h8GW 11 ай бұрын
Well, that's more of a reactionary view than a measured view on EV things. ALL humans pollute and exploit the environment they live in; it's actually natural for us to do so. I would say EVs are almost always better from an environmental stance, as they can be powered from a very large variety of electricity generation, with wildly different battery chemistries that are possible. A very strong anti-EV view usually means a poor grasp on the downsides of fossil fuels -also leaded avgas.- Having such a narrow focus makes you *_think_* EVs are the problem, and not instead overpopulation and developing economies that eat more and more resources per person. In any case, I don't believe EVs are a complete solution, and that they should be complimented with more investments in renewable biofuels.
@SuperSpecies
@SuperSpecies 10 ай бұрын
@@h8GW leaded avgas? Not for jet planes.
@krimouAAA
@krimouAAA Жыл бұрын
Why researchs are not focussed on developing new fuels?
@boss42971
@boss42971 10 ай бұрын
Electric Aircraft powered by a grid that overwhelmingly uses fossil fuels. Because that's efficient.
@user-qk4ey3qt8q
@user-qk4ey3qt8q 11 ай бұрын
금문이니라 6:07
@vibrasieve
@vibrasieve 3 ай бұрын
The airplane engine is a great invention
@BigEightiesNewWave
@BigEightiesNewWave 5 ай бұрын
Electric motor cannot do this for more than a tiny 2-man plane that flies a few minutes.😂
@user-lj2xz4gh7l
@user-lj2xz4gh7l 4 ай бұрын
جيد جدا لكن روسيا العضمى افل بهاذ المجال
@olalekanolawale9515
@olalekanolawale9515 10 ай бұрын
am a nigerian please am fully interesting to be an aerotonic engineering
@Istandby666
@Istandby666 11 ай бұрын
The 35 version with ATOL, is from the technology from the Russians.
@edot2450
@edot2450 2 ай бұрын
kalau demo terus kan jadi kuliah jadi libur .. keenakan tambah malas
@hmimouabderrahim3628
@hmimouabderrahim3628 8 ай бұрын
super...thx
@JohnStark72
@JohnStark72 Жыл бұрын
How many of these "megafactories" are in Red China while still bearing U.S. names?
@blackknight4996
@blackknight4996 Жыл бұрын
Tesla being one....what's your forking question?
How The World's Most Powerful Fighter Jet Engine Is Made
17:12
Sam Eckholm
Рет қаралды 1,1 МЛН
See Thru Jet Engine
10:14
Warped Perception
Рет қаралды 14 МЛН
New Super Advanced US Technologies to Destroy Drones
14:50
Fluctus
Рет қаралды 126 М.
THE F-35 | Where the World's Most Advanced Fighter Jet is Built
15:27
Sam Eckholm
Рет қаралды 3,2 МЛН
The Insane Engineering of the GEnX
29:28
Real Engineering
Рет қаралды 4,8 МЛН
The Pratt & Whitney J58 - The Engine of the SR-71 Blackbird
24:49
Inside Futuristic Factories Building World  Largest Jet Engines
14:33
The C-5 Galaxy: US Air Force Largest Plane Ever Made | Documentary
15:57