Ohhh PREMIUM leather! Imagine that on a 5M plane! PREMIUM!
@StrikerSG8 ай бұрын
In this range of budget, an operator will pick a light jet as a Phenon 100...
@mattiassandelving-uw7xg7 ай бұрын
Are those USB-A ports? Unable to keep any tablet alive? I would expect to see USB-C PD with 100W per port in a new aircraft of this class.
@BrandonHam6 ай бұрын
That stood out to me as well. There should be both right next to each other everywhere.
@johnisley45787 ай бұрын
And at full fuel, you'll be lucky to have only 2 persons and their backpacks on board "Inc the pilot" before you reach MTOW
@masasiization6 ай бұрын
I have heard about that complain
@macgyver21695 ай бұрын
For real? With that much horsepower?
@johnisley45785 ай бұрын
@@macgyver2169 Very true
@scottrussell22817 ай бұрын
The commentors on this video are savage. What's with all the hate?
@AGGD7673 ай бұрын
It’s very poorly done
@terrarecon8 ай бұрын
At this price I will take a HondaJet with multi-engine redundancy, I'll pay the extra costs.
@roberthenry93194 ай бұрын
But this thing has leather wrapped steering wheels. Two of them. Match that, Honda. I don't think even the Honda Civic has that. Not 2 of 'em anyway.
@BruceBusby7 ай бұрын
Its beautiful but... the TBM looks more versatile
@Lieutenant-Danskie8 ай бұрын
Why do a lot of these planes look almost identical to the TBM’s?
@brandonadams78377 ай бұрын
Because aerodynamics and physics. That’s like asking why all airplanes have wings.
@Lieutenant-Danskie7 ай бұрын
@@brandonadams7837 aerodynamics and physics doesn’t explain why it looks like a lot of turboprops use the same airframe. All these engineers aren’t coming up with the same design
@brandonadams78377 ай бұрын
@@Lieutenant-Danskie that’s like asking why do all submarines look similar. Because it works.
@qtr77 ай бұрын
@@Lieutenant-Danskie I'd suggest that you educate yourself more about Airplanes
@Lieutenant-Danskie7 ай бұрын
@@qtr7 way over your head obviously. Have a wonderful day little bud
@seagullsbtn7 ай бұрын
Cross shopping to TBM, PC12 and arguably.......King Air.....
@yesode42018 ай бұрын
5 million and it’s almost a retract! I will have to get that almost retract endorsement.
@idkjames8 ай бұрын
Lmao, i may need a new log book. I cant find the almost retract. Guess im showing my age. 😢 😂i also dont know how i feel about an aircrafts ability to initiate autoland or auto descent.
@fattony14317 ай бұрын
The M700 is NOT $5mm. Typically equipped it is $4.2, about $1mm less than the TBM960. Please change the title of your video.
@cavsh00ter4 ай бұрын
so how hard is a transition from a PA 28 to this
@tackanderson42707 ай бұрын
Five million 🤣🤣😂😂.. Even its base price of 4.1 is absurd. The 700HP-PW is an excellent power plant, but it doesn't crank it up to even 4Mil. When you can buy a near new TBM900 with a PT6A-66D 850 SHP/TP for half the Piper's cost, it's a no brainer!! Watch for the huge price drop on this. No way will the build any inventory models, so be prepared to wait while your being screwed too!
@arthouston73617 ай бұрын
Why would I buy this instead of a TBM? Anyone?
@brandonadams78377 ай бұрын
Availability would probably be the only reason. What’s the wait list for a new TBM?
@arthouston73617 ай бұрын
@@brandonadams7837 I have no idea what the wait list is for a new one, but there are many that are slightly used which are almost the equal of the new design. Good used aircraft are not a problem. The Lear 35a that I used to fly was built in 1978. I have learned to let everything that I purchase experience its initial deprecitiation before I buy it.
@HighCountryRambler2 ай бұрын
I can think of $1 Million reasons.
@Mistamannfour3 ай бұрын
Sorry, a Pilatus PC-12 is better and has more seating with a lavatory for long flights!
@wallyworld90968 ай бұрын
Piper is behind the curve when it comes to pilot/passenger size. They still build aircraft for 5’7 170 lb WW2 measurements . There goes 70% of their sales.
@tomsamuelson8512Ай бұрын
I think this plane has more instruments and electronics then a 777...
@danielepelaia78757 ай бұрын
Not, much range too expensive for a single engine prop 6 seat's. Agree, that the TBM 960 is cheaper longer range but the cruise speed falls shoe but I would pick the TBM 960.
@roberthenry93194 ай бұрын
Since you have written that "the cruise speed falls shoe", I think the chances of your getting a TBM 960 are pretty slim. But then, so are mine. That's why I'm sticking with my Chevy truck.
@danielepelaia78754 ай бұрын
@@roberthenry9319 sorry about that I meant short not shoe
@miguelkamal2563 ай бұрын
Are you kidding... 100lbs of luggage for 5 pax???
@kimskislalomАй бұрын
I thought that was strange. The ground roll and take off roll over 50 ft object is also very long.
@duanelinquist42445 ай бұрын
PC12 NGX would be $$$ better spent .....
@robertnicke32595 ай бұрын
Why should I buy this instead of a Cirrus Vision Jet for 60% of the cost?
@clockchaser3 ай бұрын
Type rating - annual cert/schooling for said type rating, cirrus typical overhaul $1 mil, cirrus fuel burn 70 gph, cirrus has abysmal climb rate 1600 fpm
@JobyJoby-iw2wr7 ай бұрын
Perhaps Piper will teach me how to fly and maintain this aircraft....
@chrisdaniel13398 ай бұрын
I would take a TBM900 over a Piper any day of the week. Shorter takeoff with 850 SHP on takeoff, faster climb rates, and faster cruise speed.
@HondaGoldwingGL18007 ай бұрын
You have a very nice looking plane, but the statement you made about it being the fastest single engine is false. As I said, this is a very nice plane, but the only way this plane can keep up with a TBM is 100% torque and a 1000 foot per minute decent. In level flight, this plane will see the tail of a TBM as it disappears out in front of you.
@AviationBase6 ай бұрын
It is PIPER's fastest single-engine aircraft ever produced, not THE fastest single-engine aircraft ever produced
@HondaGoldwingGL18006 ай бұрын
@@AviationBase Correct. Never flew one but maybe some day. I went with a friend to get his personal TBM 940 and going across the North Atlantic with the great tail wind we had at FL-300...our ground speed was over 400 mph.
@MAGApepe7 ай бұрын
imagine the sore right leg you will get from that thing on T/O lol
@holywells7 ай бұрын
And the analog backup gauges are where............??
@lassiejr21153 ай бұрын
Don't buy new these depreciate , it would be better to buy an 10yr old Jet for around 1.5 million .
@danielfofortmonville23368 ай бұрын
I would rather get a pc-12
@rossiFandallas3 ай бұрын
Dude with a mask on at FL150 by himself... bruh.
@philipo96247 ай бұрын
Pity the pilot can't see much except glare shield.
@roberthenry93194 ай бұрын
Well, that's what you get for buying the cheap one.
@peterallen310514 күн бұрын
5 mil for a piper paper plane 😂
@Jim_Wilde6 күн бұрын
Instead of spending money on new technologies like fusion engines, they spend it on pointless, 100-year-old luxury items. All industries have silly engineers nowadays...
@felicetanka7 ай бұрын
Fewer and fewer people care.
@roberthenry93194 ай бұрын
Almost nobody cares.
@dubstepTonme4 ай бұрын
This aircraft couldn’t carry Hunter Biden’s crack stash with full fuel.
@AviationBase4 ай бұрын
😂
@Ford_Raptor_R_720hp_V88 ай бұрын
*I would rather get a Beechcraft Denali*
@brandonadams78377 ай бұрын
An aircraft that is still over a year away from certification and you can’t buy yet? Ok.
@richardweller55453 ай бұрын
750nm. No thanks. If you can't compete with daher 960 or pc12 ngx your wasting your time.
@FelXH18 ай бұрын
Why should I spend 5 million Dollars on a turboprob single engine aircraft, when I can get a private jet with two engines for about 3 million Dollars?
@Alfra13247 ай бұрын
Cost of operation on a jet engine!
@brandonadams78377 ай бұрын
Because in two years you’ll spend way more keeping that old jet maintained and flying.
@FelXH17 ай бұрын
@@brandonadams7837 old jet? I thought about a citation mustang, wich is even less than 3 million now.
@brandonadams78377 ай бұрын
@@FelXH1 fair enough. I assumed you meant something used and older. Maintenance and insurance and overall operating costs will still be significant higher even for a Mustang.
@Chris_at_Home7 ай бұрын
You will get into more airports with this than a jet.
@speedomars8 ай бұрын
Pipers are junk compared to what they compete with....The price range of a Daher TBM 940 is $4,200,000 - $4,570,000
@beechcraft_58ppilot338 ай бұрын
A comment without knowledge
@4lifeifly8 ай бұрын
TBM is a hell of a lot more expensive. Both in purchase price, and running costs.
@speedomars8 ай бұрын
@@4lifeiflyWrong. The newest TBM 960 is $4.5m to $5m dependent on config. Any experienced aircraft owner would not own a Piper over a plane like a TBM even if the TBM cost $1m more. Piper is junk compared to it. Also, the Pilatus PC-12NG is $4.05 million, and fully equipped executive version will cost around $4.8 million. Then you have the Cirrus Jet SF50 which is also a far superior plane to this Piper. And you can get one of those in the $2.5 million range, and since it has a single jet engine, the maintenance run rate is far less than any other business or personal single-pilot jet.
@4lifeifly8 ай бұрын
@@speedomars lol you’re clueless. Not a single new TBM has sold for under $5M in years, and the current market for PC-12s… you aren’t touching a new one for under $7M. Don’t believe the brochures, that’s not reality. USED PC-12 still sell for as much as new TBMs.
@4lifeifly8 ай бұрын
@@speedomars I’m not saying the M700 is some revolutionary airplane… it’s a recycled design once again. But it’s not in the same class as the others. Much smaller, cheaper, and substantially cheaper in running costs. The TBM is by far a better airplane but much more expensive.
@MGMidget732 ай бұрын
A mask, really. I see there are people still falling for that con. Like the clowns you see driving by themselves wearing a mask. Also long haul flights challenging with an onboard head. At that price it should have one. Only 100lbs luggage capacity, what a joke.Change its name to Furby.
@ericwest66187 ай бұрын
Hahaha. Fastest? Clearly you haven’t been in a TBM 900-series. Oh and these don’t have a pilot door. So you have to climb over everyone just to get up front. Sorry, Piper. TBM has you beat.
@pseudonym58727 ай бұрын
You misunderstood. He said it was Piper's fastest single-engine aircraft, not the fastest from any manufacturer. The description backs that up.