instax WIDE 400 review: Fujifilm's FIRST wide camera in ten years!

My instax WIDE 400 review - Fujifilm's first wide camera in 10 years!
Order the instax WIDE 400 from Amazon: amzn.to/4c0f1ux or B&H: bhpho.to/3KPfWSC
Sell your used gear to MPB at: bit.ly/3ULU9yL
Buy used gear from MPB at: prf.hn/l/YLqwRAP
Buy Gordon a coffee: www.paypal.me/...
Gordon's In Camera book: amzn.to/2n61PfI / Amazon uk: amzn.to/2mBqRVZ
Cameralabs merchandise: redbubble.com/...
Gordon’s retro gear channel: / dinobytes
Polaroid Hoodie from: www.themaineso...
Equipment used for producing my videos
DJI Osmo Pocket 3: click.dji.com/...
Panasonic Lumix S5 II: amzn.to/3Hf5IcI
Sony A6400: prf.hn/l/pRO0wp5
Sony e 24mm f1.8: amzn.to/2TqWNzk
Rode NT USB mic: amzn.to/3AdHcUp
Rode Wireless Go II mic: amzn.to/3xkCvGo
Rode Lavalier Go mic: amzn.to/3ygzzKY
Godox UL150 light: amzn.to/2VpVbXE
Godox QR-P70 softbox: amzn.to/3yQfGdF
MacBook Pro 14in (16GB / 1TB): amzn.to/3PrKbPV
Music: www.davidcutte... / @dcuttermusic
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

[@cameralabs]

My instax WIDE 400 review - Fujifilm's first wide camera in 10 years! Order the instax WIDE 400 from Amazon: amzn.to/4c0f1ux or B&H: bhpho.to/3KPfWSC Sell your used gear to MPB at: bit.ly/3ULU9yL Buy used gear from MPB at: prf.hn/l/YLqwRAP Buy Gordon a coffee: www.paypal.me/cameralabs Gordon's In Camera book: amzn.to/2n61PfI / Amazon uk: amzn.to/2mBqRVZ Cameralabs merchandise: redbubble.com/people/cameralabs/shop Gordon’s retro gear channel: kzbin.info Polaroid Hoodie from: www.themainesouvenirshop.com Equipment used for producing my videos DJI Osmo Pocket 3: click.dji.com/AIOhqT-LWUFDq-bGk8hD4Q?pm=link Panasonic Lumix S5 II: amzn.to/3Hf5IcI Sony A6400: prf.hn/l/pRO0wp5 Sony e 24mm f1.8: amzn.to/2TqWNzk Rode NT USB mic: amzn.to/3AdHcUp Rode Wireless Go II mic: amzn.to/3xkCvGo Rode Lavalier Go mic: amzn.to/3ygzzKY Godox UL150 light: amzn.to/2VpVbXE Godox QR-P70 softbox: amzn.to/3yQfGdF MacBook Pro 14in (16GB / 1TB): amzn.to/3PrKbPV Music: www.davidcuttermusic.com / @dcuttermusic As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

[@vekofoto]

Ugh, Fujifilm... What a missed opportunity! For ten years we have been begging for a Wide camera with more controls, such as flash override, double exposure etc. And we got this, while the Mini 90 and 99 have more features. AND the selfie mode is not built-in, like on the latest Mini and Square cameras. The 500AF from 1999 is still more capable than the 400. On the bright side, this should mean Fujifilm is not planning to discontinue Instax Wide in the near future.

[@cameralabs]

Finger's crossed for something more advanced sooner than later...

[@iDavid96]

As someone who knows nothing about photography and just wants to point, shoot, this simpler approach actually appeals a lot! I always struggle with getting the exposure and flash controls of the mini 90 right.

[@AimShootDevelop]

I go through boxes & boxes of instax wide a month & was really hoping to be able to buy a new camera with more features. This is a step backwards, turning on the flash is absolutely essential for instax wide portraits. I was hoping for a Evo type or something for an easier experience.

[@cameralabs]

Hopefully there'll be a more advanced WIDE in the future... This one is more about a WIDE version of the MINI 12 I think.

[@cavb748]

I was expecting all the features of the mini 99 in the new wide camera... sad times...

[@Fluffymagicalbunny]

I was hoping for a wide evo.

[@prismaticfire]

Same

[@cameralabs]

I'm still hoping for a WIDE 99 and an EVO WIDE.

[@cf8979]

I think they may make one. Im hoping they released this one as a wide equivalent to the basic mini line (i.e. the mini 12) and a more advanced one will fill be the wides version of the 99 or evo

[@cameralabs]

@@cf8979 exactly my thoughts

[@dreadnoughtandcrow]

Pentax 17 and Instax WIDE 400 announced on the same day? I'm sensing a pattern.

[@cameralabs]

Analogue resurgence!

[@maxhammick948]

A half frame camera released on the same day as a medium format one, except the half frame camera costs 4x more

[@RyoHazuki224]

Analog is BACK, baby!! haha

[@ht8764]

I got mine a couple days ago and i love it. Its a no brainer, just point & shoot and get a great picture. I think Fujifilm made the right choice here making a simple instant camera for the masses.

[@PercyTechnic]

Well that's a let down on Fujifilm's end. They peaked with the 500AF then decided to take a step back then even stepped further back again. As much as I love my 300 and what it can do. I still want something more and this sure as heck isn't gonna cover that.

[@davexmit]

If I had a social life, or friends, I'd love this camera.

[@cameralabs]

That's why it also has selfie mode.

[@jennyjohnson5428]

​@@cameralabs cold

[@prwoojin]

Pentax 17 and the Instax Wide 400 had a huge opportunity to get the film community excited and pumped up, but only left a bitter sweet taste and the feeling of a let down due to a huge void that could have been filled easily.. I'm sticking to my 300 where I managed to figure out a way to get a timer.

[@michelecavatorta1557]

how did you manage to have a timer? the only interesting feature on the 400 btw

[@heiner71]

This camera looks like something printed out at home with a 3D printer.

[@Trevellian]

It absolutely does. What a terrible color and texture choice.

[@fabipuello]

Oh man, what a missed opportunity. I was looking forward to this camera, now I'm looking to the new polaroid instead.

[@jukeboxjohnnie]

Remember polaroid image quality is awful compared to fuji

[@cameralabs]

I'm still holding out hope for a more advanced Wide camera in the future.

[@jeitoots]

@@jukeboxjohnnie Strange. I'm taking amazing shots with my Polaroid.

[@xmeda]

@@cameralabs something looking like Fuji X100 line of cameras with some proper faster lens with at least 2-3 apertures to choose from, zone MF. Maybe add option for BT remote from phone.

[@thomasa.243]

@@jukeboxjohnnieit was like that. Nowadays, 66% are better than Instax but 33% are „meh“. But they are getting there. Instax is still more predictable and cheaper of course

[@kilroy914]

I'm new to Instax shooting, and use their GFX line as my main camera system. I did pre-order the 400, and I feel having zero control over anything other than basic focal ranges will be fun in its own way. Also, how helpful was exposure value adjustment, being you probably wouldn't know which way it would need to be adjusted until you fired off a print? Mostly getting this for an instant photowalk group in my area, and models I work have expressed that they like getting prints while on shoots. We'll see though, and hopefully I won't feel like I wasted money.

[@SimplisticallyDigital]

I just bought this camera. I have the 300 as well. I am not a fan of the photo quality of the 300, but love the Wide printer. I am considering returning the 400 if it’s not worth keeping. I haven’t opened the box. 🤔

[@stuartblink]

I’m definitely still with my Fujifilm INSTAX 500AF that I imported from Japan. I doubt it will ever be surpassed I terms of the INSTAX wide format.

[@KristiChan1]

Very jealous. I'm hoping one shows up at a thrift store and no one knows what it is lol.

[@Ni5ei]

Same here. I expected they'd finally release a Wide that would be worth buying but an Instax 100 is more advanced than this latest model. Glad I have a 500AF.

[@TomCalton]

I used to own the original wide version and loved it. I've got an album in the loft that documents a lot of my early 20's in this wide format, which I'm so grateful for as the digital photos I took back then have long been lost. The biggest downside was the bulk and the cost of prints. Great to see an updated version of this camera, though. Brilliant video as always Gordon - I hope you're well mate!

[@cameralabs]

Thanks Tom! That's interesting you've lost your digital files, but your physical prints are still safe, it's normally easier to backup and protect digital! But do make sure you scan those old photos, just in case!

[@AdamJRichardson]

Doesn't make me regret getting the Wide printer last year

[@user-yk1ie5ep1i]

Love my printer zero regrets also 👍🏽

[@BrownieX001]

Companies keep dumbing down cameras instead of making their layouts modern with all the settings needed. Odd choices. Hope it works out. Did any instax users want more automatic system and fewer options?

[@dreadnoughtandcrow]

The MOUNTAINS of sold Fuji Instax Minis and corresponding (objectively bad) film suggests you might be the one who misunderstands the users' desires.

[@michaelbell75]

@@dreadnoughtandcrowMini cameras are bought for 10 year olds who like the shape and colors. The Wide format is a completely different demographic

[@dreadnoughtandcrow]

@@michaelbell75 I've got over 300 cameras and have taken half a million images in the last 5 years, the vast majority of which were paid gigs, and my second-favorite camera is my pink Instax Mini 9, and my single favorite photo, ever, after 43 years of photography, starting with 110 as a four-year-old kid, is on Instax mini film. Anyone who doesn't like the Mini just doesn't like photography. Simple as that.

[@kingsamvisuals]

A self timer is great! Finally.

[@caloyseries4532]

Maybe the demand for Instax 500AF will decrease by this new release

[@JRodPhotoArt]

New sub here. I love the mini instax evo because it is a digital camera that can also print. Would be wonderful if they did this again in the other sizes. Great video!

[@Stephaniealk3]

An instax evo wide would be absolutely killer!

[@Lapin-Filmworks]

Great video about the instax wide 400! Well as an camera guy who has different Polaroids also the 1970s I bought it for another reason. Previous ones of my 300 fired some Polaroids in my bag twice 😅 so I find it nice that I can manually set it up just like my Yashica mat. And ofcourse the selftimer. Mostly why I bought it was for the selftimer sinds i shoot lots of events. It would nice if the controls were manually but hoping to see more “wide camera’s in the future” I use my Neo 90’s sometimes as well overal I think it’s an great beginners Polaroid. Glad to hear also your honest opinion about and lets see if they cook up something in between. Thanks for the review!

[@jenniferc.9734]

I actually just ordered one anyway even with how simple it is. I have 3 young kids and Im just trying to fit hopefully everyone in the picture and click:). The quality of your shots seems good enough for my beginner skills! Looking forward to try it for our upcoming pregnancy photoshoot:) Thanks for the review!

[@PaulvonFalkenring]

Have you checked out the Lomo Instand Wide? It's only 50€ more than the Fuji. There is also a glass lens version it's around 120€ more than the Fuji. But both feature manual controls for flash and exposure compensation. It also has some more experimental features like bulb mode and multi exposure. Only downside: the viewfinder is even further away from the lens (but it's detachable).

[@cameralabs]

I had an early version of the new glass model, but my sample didn't work well. I hope to retest if I have time

[@I922sParkCir]

What a weird downgrade from the Wide 300. Instax is such a money maker for Fujifilm. I have a wide printer that I’ve run hundreds of prints through. I’m going to keep on using the printer and never bother with the Instax wide camera.

[@KarySchump]

Well, darn, I was hoping for a new wide camera with more controls. Oh, well. I am glad this means they're still supporting the wide format. I have the wide 300 and love it with all its clunkiness and simplicity. It's one of my favorite cameras. The wide printer would be fun, so maybe that's next. Thanks for your review!! :)

[@cameralabs]

You're welcome! The printer's great, but I also hold out hope for a more advanced wide camera in the future.

[@user-yk1ie5ep1i]

Thanks for the review on this Gordon. When you brought up it actually lost the manual controls to lighten or darker the exposure I was surprised. I’m convinced at this point that the instax team is trying force people to buy the printer by releasing terrible camera options for their wide film. Time to find my wide 200 a backup. It has the best manual control set up of all the wide cameras hands down.

[@cameralabs]

I often wonder what's going on with their planning, but I suspect - or hope - this may the the first in a new series where the second might be more sophisticated. This is the basic one.

[@timeflight]

The mini gets all the innovation - evo, 99 etc. I’d love a glass-lensed high spec square or wide (or both)

[@lelandfitz1762]

Can it be said that the "loss" of exposure compensation dials happened because Instax has a new light meter / sensors built in? I think Instax also abandoned those setting options on Mini or Square models after they got better light meterin, but I am not sure. In this case it wouldn't be that bad, as Instax surely aims at getting the best photos out automatically. I think the dials were never there for people to individually exposue their pictures in the first place. They were just a necessity Instax thought they needed to implement to get good pictures.

[@ogmike6444]

what a bummer on not opting for a more manual control camera like polaroid did with the i2, its what we wanted 😥

[@joeaddison]

Thanks Gordon! Bummer Fuji didn't do anything more with this camera...

[@Mike0193Azul]

I was hoping they released something like the Mini 99 for Instax Wide 😢

[@anthonylovesey1137]

If they put all of the features from the instax SQ6 (macro, landscape, & double exposure) onto the instax WIDE, then I will be having one.

[@jasmachugh4222]

I love my Wide 300 but I also enjoy automatic cameras...BUT I will wait until the price drops or buy it used.

[@david_krause]

I wish they would do a more retro design akin to the mini 90, but I do like the look for the basic wide model (more than the new square camera design). and honestly, wish this one had multiple exposures

[@cameralabs]

It's really begging for those more advanced features. I hope they do a more advanced one soon,

[@Cookingthingsneworleans]

I like the twist to power on feature due to my 300 powering on with the accidental flick of the switch

[@juanlin555]

Thanks for the candid review. I hope it’s a matter of time until we see a more advanced SQ9x and Wide-9xx, sooner rather than later. The wide print’s larger aspect ratio is so striking that it would be a shame not to use a better capture device paired with a wide printer, at least for now.

[@cameralabs]

Finger's crossed!

[@markymarkreviews]

Great review as always. A bit "meh" camera though. I'll stick with my Instax Wide printer for now.

[@smaakjeks]

Wouldn't it be possible, since it's a fixed lens, to have a light-meter on the camera? Then you could have an EV indicator, as well. Then with control over shutter speed and aperture, you could get the exposure correct, all analogue. THAT would make for a great instant camera.

[@idt-dichtungen]

I'm super happy with my instax wide printer and shooting with my phone. Better to have a little control over exposure and what gets printed. Call me a control freak. Maybe i'll get a camera case that looks like a box of film- just for the vibe.

[@bromptinowner763]

Do you find maybe a couple of the prints have spoiled in the cartridge when printing ?

[@timothydelaney4839]

I spoke with Fuji Instax a number of months ago about their move to remove any buttons that offer control over exposure or flash: they simply aren't interested in making new cameras with these features anymore, so expect to see more cameras like this where we are locked into whatever settings the automatic exposure offers us. I bought the square version of this camera, and was severely disappointed at how under-exposed my shots were. Unless you're outside shooting in broad daylight, these new cameras just suck.

[@hedley.bradstone-unbridled]

This type of "fun" camera isn't my thing but judging from the comments, this Fuji Instax Wide 400 has gone down almost as well as the Canon R100!

[@spanishginger]

Disappointed that this still takes 4x AAs instead of 2 and that it still uses a close up lens. That’s why I held off from buying the wide 300 for so long, I just expected modern refinement.

[@lwfeagan]

I too was hoping Fuji would step up their game. I am enjoying the quality of the Polaroid I-2 body, though the film is still so-so vs Instax. The Nons SL645 produces sharp results, proving the lenses are the weak link for Instax, but is a bit slow for quickly moving toddlers.

[@108u9]

Somehow this seems IMO to further validate that the Fuji execs have decided to pursue a MVP strategy for this whole gen of camera products when the opportunity was wide open to really innovate and take more risks by putting out more developed, advance products. Hopefully there is better leadership herein at Fuji if the industry as a whole will survive the current software wave

[@definingslawek4731]

I don’t understand why they would even spend the money to develop this product, it’s almost totally redundant… the only people who care about the wide format are more professional / enthusiast photographers, I don’t think they’ll be purchasing this one over the previous one. The previous one before that had more manual control and goes for crazy money on eBay. I think the team and instax in general is confusing. Like why does my instax link wide charge with micro usb despite it being a 2023 product… usb c is now over 9 years old.

[@MurakamiFan]

pretty disappointed with the extra controls gone. appreciate the new viewfinder but ill stay with the 300 for now and wait for a wide evo if that ever eventuates.

[@cameralabs]

Finger's crossed...

[@definingslawek4731]

Why do people like the evo model so much? Why not the printer then? The camera in the evo is a really bad webcam from a 15 year old laptop, your phone has a way better camera. I use my instax link wide with my professional camera and love it.

[@cameralabs]

@@definingslawek4731 I also have the printer and enjoy using it

[@Trevellian]

A significant downgrade. Disappointing. Thanks for another honest review.

[@cameralabs]

You;re welcome, sorry to be the bearer of bad news!

[@porvoonosho]

I assume there's going to be a significantly more expensive "pro version" with manual controls.

[@cameralabs]

@@porvoonosho let's hope so

[@falxonPSN]

​@@porvoonoshothat would be nice, but I'm not sure if I see them making another wide camera for at least 5 years

[@porvoonosho]

@@falxonPSN Instax Mini 12 and Instax Mini 99 are using the same format. What makes you think this can't happen with the larger one?

[@AmbercoolPhotography]

Fuji instant film is way better than Polaroid. And yes, I have both.

[@Ni5ei]

I have a theory: If they release a more advanced camera later, let's call it the Instax Wide 600, the higher price of that camera needs to be justified by it being more advanced than the base model. Perhaps the 300 is already "too advanced" when compared to the future 600 model so people don't feel the need to upgrade. So by selling the 400 until the old 300 stock runs out, the Instax 600 will be compared to the 400, therefore making it look way more advanced and the price justified. The ugly color also fits this theory when the 600 is released in a more professional looking black.

[@xmj6830]

It seems that upgrade was given to a bunch of intermediate school students as a summer job project...

[@cameralabs]

I think the goal was to make a WIDE version of the Mini 12. What we want next is a more advanced WIDE!

[@xmj6830]

@@cameralabs That would be great indeed! I would be the first buyer...

[@SinaFarhat]

Interesting! I wonder if there can be a way to use these paper print packs as a film substitute in a 6x9 medium format camera via some kind of instant film back, maybe a 3d printed one. Keep up the good work!

[@patrickwilson1440]

There are or were some adapters around to use Instax film on some of the medium format cameras

[@rainyday3128]

I know this camera is getting a lot of flack, but I still want to buy one. The reason being, that I have had a mini since it came out and 8/10, I will mess up my photos because of using the wrong settings. A camera like this appeals to someone like me who isn't good at manually setting their cameras to take the perfect shot, it's a simple point and shoot. Probably a disappointment to camera fanatics, but somewhat of a relief for me.

[@michaellee316]

I just can't decide between this Wide 400 or the SQ1....

[@cameralabs]

Do you prefer wide or square prints?

[@AnastasTarpanov]

I know they are going for simplicity, but I'll love a professional body with manual control, something like InstantKon RF70.

[@ashliehiggins]

Would love for Fuji to release an Instax version of the Polaroid I-2.

[@cameralabs]

We'd all love that!

[@AndrewWaltonPhotography]

A missed opportunity for Fujifilm here. This camera is crying out for a decent lens. Now with less control, I'm sure remaining stock of wide 300 models will be snapped up very quickly. I think I'll stick with my 100 model that I picked up off ebay for £9 a few years ago.

[@cameralabs]

£9?! Nice price!

[@pineappleroad]

Im glad i decided to go with a printer

[@maximilianogasconrodas9009]

I really was hoping Fujifilm would drop an Instax camera with fully manual modes such as the Polaroid I-2.

[@cameralabs]

I'm still living in hope

[@JamesClark1991]

Great review. Disappointing sequel from Fuji though...

[@eirikTP]

nice! instax is a fun camera first, i wont miss any manual control.

[@andrear9500]

Thanks for reviewing

[@TheRealRichardWong]

That's a gigantic Instax 😮

[@cameralabs]

Instax-zilla!

[@alexanderaleksander4272]

In this announcement, I am happy only with batteries instead of a non-removable battery. And I buy the previous model😅

[@robertkorn]

Absolutely, AA batteries are everywhere and you won't get caught out with a dead camera.

[@angellotorresg8402]

I got high expectations for this camera after the release of the mini 99, totally disappointed.

[@nin74]

I will keep my wide 300, sounds like a much better choice.

[@sahilchopramusicbox9199]

I want to buy a instant print device? Which one you recommend. Thanks.

[@cameralabs]

Do you mean a phone printer or a camera?

[@sahilchopramusicbox9199]

@@cameralabs Hi. Its kodak mini retro which can click the pictures too and by using bluetooth it can print the existing pictures too on your device.

[@cameralabs]

@@sahilchopramusicbox9199 I've not tested the Kodak, sorry. You can see the models I've tested on my channel

[@leefairbairn225]

Very,very disappointed by this from Fuji. I have 2x300wides that are both sadly broken. Both turned on in a camera bag whilst getting them out too shoot. So I was really hoping that the 400 would of been an update and fixed that problem,of always swiping the on button,but for them set back It doesn’t seem worth it all. Absolutely gutted! And I agree with what you said in this video. If you want to just point and shoot and just treat it like a big mini then great but hopefully they will bring out maybe a 450 😂. Self timer/zoom on button Just as a side note if by some miracle does anyone know if there is a repair place in the uk that does actual fix 300? Would be greatly appreciated if anyone does

[@Whaly50]

That problem in this camera was resolved. For turn on the Wide 400 you only have to move the lens to the left.

[@kaziqmaziq6703]

Photos are beautiful!

[@cameralabs]

Thanks!

[@Honeytrap818]

Does the same size film for the 300 fit for the new 400 🤔🤔🤔🤔 from one day to another the pictures from my 300 would come out blank/white (wasting my film) after I had just bought 3 more packs of film. Interested in buying the new 400 after finding out the 300 was discontinued

[@cameralabs]

Yes, they both use Wide film cartridges.

[@MrBtodd2]

Thanks Gordon for another good review. I'm very disappointed in Fuji. I love wide format and I really enjoy the 300, but I just expected more from Fuji with this one. If it had been a hydrid or better still a model that had more controls like the 99, I would have probably bought one. Wide supporters have been asking Fuji for years for a more capable Wide camera. They obviously dont listen. Sad.

[@ogmike6444]

manually opening and closing the lens should save a ton of battery right?

[@tedcrosby9361]

Just turn the knob!

[@teleaddict23]

For years, people have been calling for an updated Instax Wide camera with more control, but instead we get this and it’s even worse than the 300. I don’t understand what Fuji were thinking when they designed this.

[@michaelbell75]

It took Fuji TEN YEARS to make a Wide camera worse than its predecessor? What a complete failure. I much prefer my Lomo instant wide. They are our only hope for a new Wide that’s actually good.

[@cameralabs]

Yep, the LOMO Wide is pretty neat, I meant to mention it here.

[@KristiChan1]

I have and love my 300, but I'm also seriously eyeing Lomo's wide camera for more artistic ventures; their square format cameras look fun too.

[@michaelbell75]

@@KristiChan1 I have had the Wide 210, 300 and the Lomo Wide, kept the Lomo and sold the other two. The Lomo Square glass is awesome too, love mine. I think they might be back in stock finally.

[@ManyDoors777]

Is black and white wide film available for this camera?

[@cameralabs]

Yes, they make monochrome wide

[@edcAdventures.]

Damn they couldn't just make a wide mini evo or other varieties with upgraded components. It was the best instax they have imo, just needed a new improved version

[@keithwalsh1882]

I've always liked the idea of the wide Instax but was turned off by the one camera Fuji offered due to it being basically a point-and-shoot when it seems like the perfect film to use with a camera with lots of adjustments. So after 10 years, they come out with a new version with even less flexibility. Hard pass again. It seems Lomography remains the only reasonable option for this film

[@RufleX]

Fujifilm take Fuji SQ1 and and extended for a wide format nothing more, what a waste of opportunity, I hope I don't have to wait 10 more years for a real wide format camera

[@jbtfilm684]

I am waiting for a hybrid wide... huhuhu

[@robertharrison9803]

OMG! This is it? Let me fake a smile… just heard a song - “why do I keep f*!#in’ up?”🤭 My X-M1 gives me peace of mind.

[@TungstenOvergaard]

As exciting as the Instal Pal. But better AF than the XH2s, I bet.

[@cameralabs]

Ooof, harsh!

[@IvanRiveraStagea]

They should've added autofocus and autoexposure. That'd make it way less frustrating for most people at very little added cost.

[@cameralabs]

The exposure is automatic! I'd have liked a bit of manual over-ride!

[@IvanRiveraStagea]

@@cameralabs Shutter speed and aperture aren't fixed anymore? Past models had those fixed.

[@cameralabs]

@@IvanRiveraStagea I assume the aperture is fixed, but the shutter is variable to balance the exposure - otherwise there's no way I'd have been able to capture the range of brightnesses in my sample photos. Either way, the overall exposure (and flash) is automatic and will try to get it right under various conditions as I showed.

[@IvanRiveraStagea]

@@cameralabs Thanks! I just checked and it does select from 3 shutter speeds automatically. 1/64, 1/120 and 1/200.

[@oudviola]

Same as the loss of manual features from the previous SQ6 to the current square. They obviously are not considering serious photographers' needs.

[@RollinLeonard]

It sucks that we have to go with 3rd party 3d printed mods to make instax work with interchangeable lenses, external flash, and full manual control.

[@anthonysimpson6738]

I think they missed an opportunity. I get impression no one is at the steering wheel for Fujifilm Instax cameras in terms of direction or vision. Maybe they going to do a Polaroid. We need a hybrid Square and Wide camera. With a toggle button to go traditional instant print or hybrid digital cheat. It really is a shame as instant cameras are so popular at the moment but there isn’t a camera that really is modern and takes them to the next level. Good honest review and you could read the disappointment in your voice although very politely, cheers.

[@cameralabs]

Thanks! Yes, I really hope there'll be a 99 or EVO version in the future.

[@kcphotogeek6207]

Was about to buy an Instax 300 I stopped when I seen this video...back to the 300 I think

[@InternetWesley]

I'd recommend the Lomo'instant Wide over any of the first party fuji wide cameras tbh

[@MysterBlu]

@@InternetWesley I have the Lomo. I would recommend it only if you're ok with the viewfinder only being kind of right. It's kind of annoying to frame shots well. Results look good though after.

[@Ni5ei]

​@@InternetWesley The quality of the Lomo is toy grade. Fuji 500AF is still king.

[@AjaySingh-228]

Great review Sir! I really enjoyed seeing the close-up shots you were able to take with the wide 400. It's a shame it doesn't have built-in close-up functionality like the newer mini cameras, but the accessory seems to work well. I think for people who want a wide format Instax camera, this is a great option, especially considering the price point.. ✌️

[@1marcelfilms]

I bought a cheap half frame camera on aliexpress the other day but this is also very tempting if some used. 35mm film is too bloody expensive and the developing very unreliable. (and also damn expensive) Meanwhile instax film is rather cheap and instant......

[@severgun]

Insane price per print

[@RodrigoVazquez91]

Just like the upgrade we had with the Instax Mini 99 coming from the Instax 90, I was expecting something similar from the Instax Wide 300, but this one feels so disappointing, the color looks sad and cheap, even the Wide 300 looks much better, it had an LCD screen with basic info, In sorry to say this, but this feels like a downgrade

[@cameralabs]

I hope this is the first of several new WIDE cameras, starting with a simple Mini 12 style, before they do a more advanced model. I hope!

[@deejayiwan7]

Gotta love that North Korean industrial design.....

[@teemo1832]

Better Lens plz

[@theangrymonkey]

Never get your hopes up

[@MatthewMorse]

This is Fuji's way of saying they're not interested in supporting the Wide format anymore. They threw us a bone with this, but it's a laughable attempt at an Instax Wide, at best. Fuji had an opportunity here to do something really magical with the Wide format, and they made their stance known.

[@bahadrbaserkok3335]

Can anyone please recommend me an better model around the the price range of wide400 ± 500€

[@cameralabs]

This is the only current model from Fujifilm. Maybe try lomography?

[@petermach8635]

These cameras really need a Bluetooth trigger, just like a 'phone ..... a self-timer really doesn't cut it any more, that dash back to the chosen spot and then trying to look unhurried and sensible.

[@dan.allen.digital]

I would not buy it simply because they moved the viewfinder window from the left side to the right side. I'll stick with my Wide 300 model

[@tonykeltsflorida]

So sad that the cost per print is 5 times higher than it should be.

[@wowJhil]

First :D Dam, it was long ago I used to watch your vids, when you used to zoom in on same area in all vids. That was quite some time ago. (16 years, dam!)

[@cameralabs]

Where have you been? I've still been publishing new videos almost eery week for 18 years! Anyway, I'm now in Brighton since 2012, and you'll see me zooming in on the Pier on my more recent reviews! Happy you found me again - make sure you have notifications selected, or you may not see me for another 10 years!

[@wowJhil]

@@cameralabs It has more to do with me having a big interest in cameras way back, but then my interest fell off. But I did appreciate your videos a lot back then! :) I do think you are one of the best for sure on this area!

[@cameralabs]

@@wowJhil thanks! I hope you get a chance to watch more of my videos in the future! You may also be interested in my vintage channel, Dino Bytes or my Travel Tips channel!

[@evo271]

SAME cameras since launch. Exposure time 1/200 max, might as well buy one used for 30-50$ and film the rest of the money. What exactly is new ? The colors ? Woooooow

[@ldmndz4652]

the fact that they took away some "features" from the Wide 300..is really disappointing...sticking to the Wide 300 for now..lol

[@paulnewman9275]

Oh dear me, I love nearly all the Fuji Instax range but after a 10 year wait this new 400 seems like a massive step backwards. Will continue to use my Wide printer instead ..... If Fuji had launched a modern, even better, version of the 500AF then despite being obviously more expensive it would have been a huge seller. Come on Fuji listen to what people want !