Excellent Presentation: Can you help me understand why the latest (2020) version of ASTM C39 changed the calculation formula from using the standard cross-sectional area of the cylinder (as described above) to muliplying the applied force by 4 and then dividing by the pi x DIAMETER of the cylinder squared?
@IntelligentConcrete3 жыл бұрын
HEY HEY BRIAN!!! I didn't know about the change more than likely its due to the fact that we measure Diameter of the cylinder and not radius.
@robertoreyes35883 жыл бұрын
Pretty nice explanation easy and fast love it can you guys do a video about unit. Weight explain it so some people can understand more what it is ? Please
@IntelligentConcrete3 жыл бұрын
Thanks and can do!!!
@stanjames45487 ай бұрын
isnt it the compressive strength is calculated by the bigger area of the cylinder? the diameter x height?
@IntelligentConcrete7 ай бұрын
No Sir. P = F / A. Pressure = Force divided by area of the applied load.
@stanjames45487 ай бұрын
@@IntelligentConcrete oh surely i know its §=P/A, what i mean is the area(A) use to calculate the compressive strength, isn't the diameter x height?
@IntelligentConcrete7 ай бұрын
@@stanjames4548 no. That is when you are doing Splitting tensile strength.
@adriengignoux8134 жыл бұрын
oh my god what are those units
@IntelligentConcrete4 жыл бұрын
Howdy Adrien, those are common units to express compressive, flexural, and tensile strength of materials in the US. Across the big blue pond folks normally use MPa. For a frame of reference, there is 145 psi for every 1 MPa.
@TheOnion6195 ай бұрын
Such an absolute cutie!
@ahmet97192 ай бұрын
A solid object with width, length and height(thickness) of 15x15x(15) cube is placed in a hydraulic press. It breaks with a load of 300 kN. At what load would 15x15x(2) object made of the exact same material break? please don't say "at same load" we know the second one is broken easier than first one. because it must be this way. because it is thinner. i searched all the internet, couldn't find it. is there a formula of this? If you are going to say "it will break "at the same load"", despite everything, please convince me.
@IntelligentConcrete2 ай бұрын
@@ahmet9719 ASTM C 42 - gives correction factors for shorter samples.
@ahmet97192 ай бұрын
@@IntelligentConcrete could you please elaborate that article? I am not an english man. I read it but couldn't understand.
@IntelligentConcrete2 ай бұрын
@@ahmet9719 In ASTM C 42, the "strength correction factor" is a numerical value applied to the compressive strength of a concrete core to account for the variation in strength based on its length-to-diameter (L/D) ratio, essentially correcting for the observed phenomenon where cores with a smaller L/D ratio tend to exhibit a lower measured strength compared to cores with a more ideal L/D ratio, typically considered to be around 2:1; this means that if a core has a significantly different L/D ratio, the measured strength needs to be adjusted to reflect a more accurate representation of the concrete's true strength.