Introducing the Babcock Arrowhead 140

  Рет қаралды 48,281

Thales Nederland

Thales Nederland

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 46
@starrider529
@starrider529 Ай бұрын
If this is such a good. British designed Frigate, why was this not considered as a replacement for the existing Royal Navy Frigates? Personally, I think it's a good design and capable ship.
@fourlinemusic7641
@fourlinemusic7641 3 жыл бұрын
🇮🇩🤝🇬🇧
@banghenry5046
@banghenry5046 3 жыл бұрын
Mulai dah 😂😂
@arifprasetyo2906
@arifprasetyo2906 3 жыл бұрын
Knapa ya orng indonesia kebanyakan norak" dan tolol"
@aryowicaksono9740
@aryowicaksono9740 3 жыл бұрын
@@arifprasetyo2906 cuma emot bendera kok dibilang norak dan tolol
@fanta519
@fanta519 3 жыл бұрын
@@aryowicaksono9740 ngantuk dia, komen jam 3 malem, emosi terganggu
@susiastary6714
@susiastary6714 3 жыл бұрын
@@arifprasetyo2906 maksudnya? Emng dia over proud gitu ya?
@RayRay79
@RayRay79 9 ай бұрын
Was this designed to New Zealand and Australia?
@teddy2738
@teddy2738 2 жыл бұрын
The Chilean Navy the see come much optimization ( cost £ 300 millions libras esterlinas c / u. x 8 frigates in total ), versión ARROWHEAD -140 ACH from the CHilean Navy ( short of 132 mts. + - and 5.200 tns. standard )
@jimmysweat2200
@jimmysweat2200 Жыл бұрын
Awesome
@swelectrical2568
@swelectrical2568 3 жыл бұрын
I would suggest a more in your face, aggressive, no compromise name. Remenber who you are selling the idea to. Devistation class Apocalypse class Lots more to choose from. Thanks.
@ThalesNederlandBV
@ThalesNederlandBV 3 жыл бұрын
Well, perhaps the five shipnames that they've revealed, might interest you! - Venturer - Bulldog - Campbeltown - Formidable - Active Not bad, is it?
@davidhouseman4328
@davidhouseman4328 3 жыл бұрын
@@ThalesNederlandBV Yeah. Not convinced by the "Inspiration class" as a name but the actual ship names are quality.
@jboydayz
@jboydayz Жыл бұрын
bro thinks this is warhammer 40k💀
@GS-yg9wk
@GS-yg9wk Жыл бұрын
the disadvantage of these ships is that there is not enough space for some sea helicopters
@admiralmallard7500
@admiralmallard7500 Жыл бұрын
Got room for at least 1
@GS-yg9wk
@GS-yg9wk Жыл бұрын
@@admiralmallard7500 the AW 101 helicopter does not fit on board
@admiralmallard7500
@admiralmallard7500 Жыл бұрын
@@GS-yg9wk Ah. Yeh looks like it fits small choppers like Wildcats, I assume there's more equivalents of it out there.
@jboydayz
@jboydayz Жыл бұрын
Why do our british ships lack missles so badly, we only every get like 52😢😢
@Blindfolded.911
@Blindfolded.911 Жыл бұрын
Because British is now too depending on US missiles. Missiles research in UK is almost dead.
@admiralmallard7500
@admiralmallard7500 Жыл бұрын
These are far better armed than the T23 they're replacing, and similarly armed to the american constellation class
@jboydayz
@jboydayz Жыл бұрын
@@admiralmallard7500well that’s something
@jimmysweat2200
@jimmysweat2200 Жыл бұрын
Enlarge the platform to add more cells
@admiralmallard7500
@admiralmallard7500 Жыл бұрын
@@jimmysweat2200 32 is above average for most European frigates. The American Constellation will have the same.
@nafisfuadayon6832
@nafisfuadayon6832 3 жыл бұрын
Offer this design to Bangladesh Navy with the latest and maximum types of weaponry including CIWS, ATMACA SSM and Albatros NG SAM system.
@lukeallison3713
@lukeallison3713 7 ай бұрын
The base design (Iver Huitfeldt) might well have what you are looking for- 3 gun positions (A up 127mm, B up to 76, and the aft most up to 40mm), 32 mk 41 cells for area air defence, 12 mk 56 cells for twin packed essm, 2 x3 torpedo launchers, helicopter, an aesa radar and 16 anti ship missiles. Not sure if the same topweight is available in the arrowhead 140, but at a minimum, 32 mk 41 and 16 anti ship missiles are still possible as demonstrated on the polish swordfish class. A lighweight launcher like EXLS (smaller than a mk 56 launcher) can quadpack camm as its considerably shorter and smaller than essm, not sure if camm-er could be though. Not sure Mk 41, area air defence would be in bangladesh cost bracket- the IH was built for 325 million us dollars 2008- with the Mk 41 but comissioning without standard missiles to fill it, and 2 leftover 76mm guns. Bangladesh priority would probably be volume of anti ship missiles and vessel self defence, you only need a base Arrowhead 140 sensor fit to support Camm/ Camm-ER. Also worth keeping in mind is that the ship can be built with raft mounted machinery if specified from order as well as towed array and hull sonar according to babcock. The Mk 41 cells could also take an Asroc if going down the ASW route
@jimmysweat2200
@jimmysweat2200 Жыл бұрын
Enla
@yudhooktariano3677
@yudhooktariano3677 2 жыл бұрын
Eh *#KESAMPEAN* Ya Salam
@NontonFilm92
@NontonFilm92 2 жыл бұрын
Welcome to Indonesian
@mattross83
@mattross83 4 ай бұрын
At the end it says “proven” that’s a blatant lie, the first ship isn’t even complete yet, so not only has it not seen conflict, it hasn’t even passed sea trials! 😂😂😂
Babcock's Type 31 & Arrowhead 140 Frigates at DSEI 2023
4:59
Naval News
Рет қаралды 59 М.
RAPIDFIRE - Thales
2:42
Thales
Рет қаралды 223 М.
ЗНАЛИ? ТОЛЬКО ОАЭ 🤫
00:13
Сам себе сушист
Рет қаралды 3,9 МЛН
When mom gets home, but you're in rollerblades.
00:40
Daniel LaBelle
Рет қаралды 125 МЛН
An in-depth look at the Type 26 frigate design
13:50
Navy Lookout
Рет қаралды 452 М.
Vard 7 125 OPV
2:28
SH Defence
Рет қаралды 86 М.
IAI at IMDEX Asia 2023: Total Battle Unit Solutions
6:44
Naval News
Рет қаралды 48 М.
How a Nighthawk Was Shot Down
12:06
Yarnhub
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
The Problem with Biofuels
15:01
Real Engineering
Рет қаралды 1,9 МЛН
Babcock's Arrowhead 140 Frigate at DSEI 2021
4:48
Naval News
Рет қаралды 110 М.
BAE LHD
7:48
Sovereign Pictures
Рет қаралды 233 М.
ЗНАЛИ? ТОЛЬКО ОАЭ 🤫
00:13
Сам себе сушист
Рет қаралды 3,9 МЛН